Performance issue related to Wrapper and variable value retrievel

If I have a array of int(primitive array) and on the
other hand if I have an array of it's corresponding
Wrapper class , while dealing is there is any
performance difference betwen these 2 cases . If in
my code I am doing to conversion from primitive to
wrapper object , is that affecting my performnace as
there is already a concept of auto-boxing.I'm sure there is. It's probably not worth worrying about until you profile your application and determine it's actually an issue.
Another issue is that if I acces the value of a
variable name (defined in in superclass) in subclass
by ' this.getName() ' rather than ' this.name ' .
is there ne performance diffreance between the 2
cases.Probably, but that also depends on what precisely getName() is doing doesn't it? This is a rather silly thing to be worrying about.

Similar Messages

Performance issues -- related to printing

Hi All,
I am haviing production system performance issues related to printing. endusers are telling the printing is slow for almost printers. We are having more that 40 to 50 printers in landscape.
As per my primary investigation I didnt find any issues in TSP01 & TSP02 tables. But I can see the table TST01 and TST03 table having many number of entries (more that lakh). I dont have idead about this table. Is ther eany thing related to this table where the print causes slowness or any other factors also makes this printing issue .. Please advice ..
thanks in advance

Hai,
Check the below link...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/c1/1cca3bdcd73743e10000000a114084/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/fc/04ca3bb6f8c21de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/86/1ccb3b560f194ce10000000a114084/content.htm
TemSe cannot administer objects that require more than two gigabytes of storage space, regardless of whether the objects are stored in the database or in the file system. Spool requests of a size greater than two gigabytes must therefore be split into several smaller requests.
It is enough if you perform the regular background jobs and Temse consistency checks for the tables.
This will help in controlling the capacity problems.
If you change the profile parameter rspo/store_location parameter value to 'G' this will make the performance better. The disadvantages are TemSe data must be backed up and restored separately from the database using operating system tools, In the event of problems, it can be difficult to restore consistency between the data held in files and the TemSeu2019s object management in the database. Also you have take care of the Hard disk requirements because in some cases, spool data may occupy several hundred megabytes of disk storage. If you use the G option, you must ensure that enough free disk space is available for spool data.
Regards,
Yoganand.V

RE: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte3M

Hi James,
Could you give me a call, I am at my desk.
I had meetings all day and couldn't respond to your calls earlier.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Min [mailto:jminbrio.forte.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 2:50 PM
To: Sharma, Sandeep; Pyatetskiy, Alexander
Cc: sophiaforte.com; kenlforte.com; Tenerelli, Mike
Subject: Re: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte 3M
Hello,
I just want to reiterate that we are very committed to working on
this issue, and that our goal is to find out the root of the problem. But
first I'd like to narrow down the avenues by process of elimination.
Open Cursor is something that is commonly used in today's RDBMS. I
know that you must test your query in ISQL using some kind of execute
immediate, but Sybase should be able to handle an open cursor. I was
wondering if your Sybase expert commented on the fact that the server is
not responding to commonly used command like 'open cursor'. According to
our developer, we are merely following the API from Sybase, and open cursor
is not something that particularly slows down a query for several minutes
(except maybe the very first time). The logs show that Forte is waiting for
a status from the DB server. Actually, using prepared statements and open
cursor ends up being more efficient in the long run.
Some questions:
1) Have you tried to do a prepared statement with open cursor in your ISQL
session? If so, did it have the same slowness?
2) How big is the table you are querying? How many rows are there? How many
are returned?
3) When there is a hang in Forte, is there disk-spinning or CPU usage in
the database server side? On the Forte side? Absolutely no activity at all?
We actually have a Sybase set-up here, and if you wish, we could test out
your database and Forte PEX here. Since your queries seems to be running
off of only one table, this might be the best option, as we could look at
everything here, in house. To do this:
a) BCP out the data into a flat file. (character format to make it portable)
b) we need a script to create the table and indexes.
c) the Forte PEX file of the app to test this out.
d) the SQL staement that you issue in ISQL for comparison.
If the situation warrants, we can give a concrete example of
possible errors/bugs to a developer. Dial-in is still an option, but to be
able to look at the TOOL code, database setup, etc. without the limitations
of dial-up may be faster and more efficient. Please let me know if you can
provide this, as well as the answers to the above questions, or if you have
any questions.
Regards,
At 08:05 AM 3/30/00 -0500, Sharma, Sandeep wrote:
James, Ken:
FYI, see attached response from our Sybase expert, Dani Sasmita. She has
already tried what you suggested and results are enclosed.
++
Sandeep
-----Original Message-----
From: SASMITA, DANIAR
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 6:43 PM
To: Pyatetskiy, Alexander
Cc: Sharma, Sandeep; Tenerelli, Mike
Subject: Re: FW: Case 59063: Select using LIKE has performance
issues
w/ CTLIB and Forte 3M
We did that trick already.
When it is hanging, I can see what is doing.
It is doing OPEN CURSOR. But not clear the exact statement of the cursor
it is trying to open.
When we run the query directly to Sybase, not using Forte, it is clearly
not opening any cursor.
And running it directly to Sybase many times, the response is always
consistently fast.
It is just when the query runs from Forte to Sybase, it opens a cursor.
But again, in the Forte code, Alex is not using any cursor.
In trying to capture the query,we even tried to audit any statementcoming
to Sybase. Same thing, just open cursor. No cursor declaration anywhere.==============================================
James Min
Technical Support Engineer - Forte Tools
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
1800 Harrison St., 17th Fl.
Oakland, CA 94612
james.minsun.com
510.869.2056
==============================================
Support Hotline: 510-451-5400
CUSTOMERS open a NEW CASE with Technical Support:
http://www.forte.com/support/case_entry.html
CUSTOMERS view your cases and enter follow-up transactions:
http://www.forte.com/support/view_calls.html

Earthlink wrote:
Contrary to my understanding, the <font face="courier">with_pipeline</font> procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy <font face="courier">no_pipeline</font> procedure. Am I missing something? Well, we're missing a lot here.
Like:
- a database version
- how did you test
- what data do you have, how is it distributed, indexed
and so on.
If you want to find out what's going on then use a TRACE with wait events.
All nessecary steps are explained in these threads:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
Another nice one is RUNSTATS:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701

I am having issues related to storage and I believe this is causing my computer to slow down. "Other" files part is the major occupier(180 GB). I have done Omni disk and multiple other cleaning(iTunes-device, restart, etc), yet have not been able to empty

I am having issues related to storage and I believe this is causing my computer to slow down. "Other" files part is the major occupier(180 GB). I have done Omni disk and multiple other cleaning(iTunes-device, restart, etc), yet have not been able to empty any more space, nor to speed up my computer? Any suggestions? All your contributions are welcomed. Thanks. Mehmet Mazhar Celikoyar

Below is the result:
Hardware Information:
          MacBook Pro (15-inch, Mid 2009)
          MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro5,3
          1 3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo CPU: 2 cores
          4 GB RAM
Video Information:
          NVIDIA GeForce 9400M - VRAM: 256 MB
          NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT - VRAM: 512 MB
Audio Plug-ins:
          BluetoothAudioPlugIn: Version: 1.0
          AirPlay: Version: 1.9
          AppleAVBAudio: Version: 2.0.0
          iSightAudio: Version: 7.7.3
Startup Items:
          HP IO - Path: /Library/StartupItems/HP IO
System Software:
          OS X 10.9 (13A603) - Uptime: 3 days 22:8:6
Disk Information:
          ST9500420ASG disk0 : (500.11 GB)
                    EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
                    Macintosh HD (disk0s2) /: 499.25 GB (220.49 GB free)
                    Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>: 650 MB
          HL-DT-ST DVDRW GS23N
USB Information:
          Apple Inc. Built-in iSight
          Apple Internal Memory Card Reader
          Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
          Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
          Apple Inc. BRCM2046 Hub
                    Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
FireWire Information:
Thunderbolt Information:
Kernel Extensions:
          com.rim.driver.BlackBerryUSBDriverInt          (0.0.64)
          com.livedrive.filesystems.livedrivefs          (2.1.14)
Problem System Launch Daemons:
Problem System Launch Agents:
Launch Daemons:
          [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist
          [loaded] com.adobe.versioncueCS4.plist
          [loaded] com.creativebe.MainMenuHelper.plist
          [loaded] com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2.Agent.plist
          [loaded] com.magican.castle.plist
          [loaded] com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist
          [loaded] com.rim.BBDaemon.plist
          [failed] com.zeobit.MacKeeper.plugin.AntiTheft.daemon.plist
Launch Agents:
          [loaded] com.adobe.CS4ServiceManager.plist
          [loaded] com.hp.messagecenter.launcher.plist
          [loaded] com.hp.productresearch.plist
          [loaded] com.rim.BBLaunchAgent.plist
User Launch Agents:
          [loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist
          [failed] com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2Helper.diskSpaceWatcher.plist
          [failed] com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2Helper.scheduledScan.plist
          [failed] com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2Helper.trashWatcher.plist
          [failed] com.UninstallerTool.plist
          [failed] com.VolumeWatcherTool.plist
          [failed] com.zeobit.MacKeeper.Helper.plist
User Login Items:
          BlackBerry Device Manager
          HP Scheduler
3rd Party Preference Panes:
          Adobe Version Cue CS4
          DC30 Xact Driver Panel
          Flash Player
          Flip4Mac WMV
          Perian
Internet Plug-ins:
          AdobePDFViewer.plugin
          AdobePDFViewerNPAPI.plugin
          Default Browser.plugin
          Flash Player.plugin
          FlashPlayer-10.6.plugin
          Flip4Mac WMV Plugin.plugin
          iPhotoPhotocast.plugin
          JavaAppletPlugin.plugin
          OfficeLiveBrowserPlugin.plugin
          QuickTime Plugin.plugin
          SharePointBrowserPlugin.plugin
          Silverlight.plugin
User Internet Plug-ins:
          OctoshapeWeb.plugin
Bad Fonts:
          None
Time Machine:
          Mobile backups: OFF
          Auto backup: NO
          Volumes being backed up:
                    Macintosh HD: Disk size: 499.25 GB Disk used: 278.75 GB
          Destinations:
                    TOSHIBA EXT [Local] (Last used)
                    Total size: 2 TB
                    Total number of backups: 5
                    Oldest backup: 2013-10-24 23:21:31 +0000
                    Last backup: 2013-10-25 02:59:08 +0000
                    Size of backup disk: Excellent
                              Backup size 2 TB > (Disk size 499.25 GB X 3)
Top Processes by CPU:
               3%          WindowServer
               1%          EtreCheck
               1%          Microsoft PowerPoint
               0%          BBLaunchAgent
               0%          fontd
               0%          aosnotifyd
Top Processes by Memory:
          168 MB             Microsoft PowerPoint
          123 MB             Safari
          86 MB              Mail
          74 MB              WindowServer
          45 MB              com.apple.WebKit.Networking
          45 MB              com.apple.WebKit.WebContent
          41 MB              Finder
          41 MB              PluginProcess
          41 MB              mds_stores
          33 MB              Notes
Virtual Memory Statistics:
          72 MB              Free RAM
          1.27 GB            Active RAM
          1.24 GB            Inactive RAM
          667 MB             Wired RAM
          2.58 GB            Page-ins
          111 MB             Page-outs

How to put the column name and variable value in the alert message.

Dear,
how can i put the column name and variable value in the alert message text. i want to display an alert which tell the user about the empty textboxes. that these textboxes must be filled.
Regards:
Muhammad Nadeem
CHIMERA PVT. LTD.
LAHORE
[email protected]

Hello,
The name of the item that fires the current trigger is stored in the :SYSTEM.TRIGGER_ITEM system variable.
The value contained in this item can be retrived with the Name_In() built-in
value := Name_In( 'SYSTEM.TRIGGER_ITEM') ;
LC$Msg := 'The item ' || :SYSTEM.TRIGGER_ITEM || ' must be entered' ;
Set_Alert_Property('my_alert_box', ALERT_MESSAGE_TEXT, LC$Msg ) ;
Ok := Show_Alert( 'my_alert_box' ) ;
...Francois

Performance issues related to logging (ForceSingleTraceFile option)

Dear SDN members,
I have a question about logging.
I like to place my logs/traces for every application in different log files. By doing this you have to set the ForceSingleTraceFile option to NO (in the config tool).
But in a presentation of SAP, named SAP Web Application Server 6.40; SAP Logging and Tracing API, is stated:
- All traces by default go to the default trace file.
- Good for performance
- On production systems, this is a must!!!
- Hard to find your trace messages
- Solution: Configure development systems to pipe traces and logs for applications to their own specific trace file
But I want the logs/traces also by our customers (production systems) in separate files. So my question is:
What are the performance issues we face, if we turn the ForceSingleTraceFile option to NO by our customers?
and
If we turn the ForceSingleTraceFile to NO will the logs/traces of the SAP applications also go to different files? If so, then I can imagine that it will be difficult to find the logs of the different SAP applications.
I hope that someone can clarify the working of the ForceSingleTraceFile setting.
Kind regards,
Marinus Geuze

Dear Marinus,
The performance issues with extensive logging are related to high memory usage (for concatenation/generation of the messages which are written to the log files) and as result increased garbare collection frequency, as well as high disk I/O and CPU overhead for the actual logging.
Writing to same trace file, if logging is extensive can become a bottleneck.
Anyway it is not related to if you should write the logs to the default trace of a standard location. I believe that the recommendation in the documentation is just about using the standard logging APIs of the SAP Java Server, because they are well optimized.
Best regards,
Sylvia

Performance issues involving tables S031 and S032

Hello gurus,
I am having some performance issues. The program involves accessing data from S031 and S032. I have pasted the SELECT statements below. I have read through the forums for past postings regarding performance, but I wanted to know if there is anything that stands out as being the culprit of very poor performance, and how it can be corrected. I am fairly new to SAP, so I apologize if I've missed an obvious error. From debugging the program, it seems the 2nd select statement is taking a very long time to process.
GT_S032: approx. 40,000 entries
S031:    approx. 90,000 entries
MSEG:    approx. 115,000 entries
MKPF:    approx. 100,000 entries
MARA:    approx. 90,000 entries
SELECT
vrsio          "Version
werks          "Plan
lgort          "Storage Location
matnr          "Material
ssour          "Statistic(s) origin
FROM s032
INTO TABLE gt_s032
WHERE ssour = space                                           AND   vrsio = c_000                                           AND   werks = gw_werks.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
SELECT
    vrsio        "Version
    werks        "Plant
    spmon        "Period to analyze - month
    matnr        "Material
    lgort        "Storage Location
    wzubb        "Valuated stock receipts value
    wagbb        "Value of valuated stock being issued
FROM s031
INTO TABLE gt_s031
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_s032
WHERE ssour = gt_s032-ssour
AND   vrsio = gt_s032-vrsio
AND   spmon IN r_spmon
AND   sptag = '00000000'
AND   spwoc = '000000'
AND   spbup = '000000'
AND   werks = gt_s032-werks
AND   matnr = gt_s032-matnr
AND   lgort = gt_s032-lgort
AND   ( wzubb <> 0 OR wagbb <> 0 ).
ELSE.
WRITE: 'No data selected'(m01).
EXIT.
ENDIF.
SORT gt_s032 BY vrsio werks lgort matnr.
SORT gt_s031 BY vrsio werks spmon matnr lgort.
SELECT
p~werks          "Plant
p~matnr          "Material
p~mblnr          "Document Number
p~mjahr          "Document Year
p~bwart          "Movement type
p~dmbtr          "Amount in local currency
t~shkzg          "Debit/Credit indicator
INTO TABLE gt_scrap
FROM mkpf AS h
INNER JOIN mseg AS p
   ON hmblnr = pmblnr
AND hmjahr = pmjahr
INNER JOIN mara AS m
   ON pmatnr = mmatnr
INNER JOIN t156 AS t
   ON pbwart = tbwart
WHERE h~budat => gw_duepr-begda
AND h~budat <= gw_duepr-endda
AND p~werks = gw_werks.
Thanks so much for your help,
Jayesh

Issue with table s031 and with for all entries.
Hi,
I have following code in which select statement on s031 is
taking long time and after that it shows a dump. What should I do instead of
exceeding the time limit of execution of an abap program.
TYPES:
BEGIN OF TY_MTL, " Material Master
    MATNR TYPE MATNR,   " Material Code
    MTART TYPE MTART,   " Material Type
    MATKL TYPE MATKL,   " Material Group
    MEINS TYPE MEINS,   " Base unit of Measure
    WERKS TYPE WERKS_D, " Plant
    MAKTX TYPE MAKTX,   " Material description (Short Text)
    LIFNR TYPE LIFNR,   " vendor code
    NAME1 TYPE NAME1_GP, " vendor name
    CITY TYPE ORT01_GP, " City of Vendor
    Y_RPT TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Yearly receipt
    Y_ISS TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Yearly Consumption
    M_OPG TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Month opg
    M_OPG1 TYPE P DECIMALS 3,
    M_RPT TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Month receipt
    M_ISS TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Month issue
    M_CLG TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Month Closing
    D_BLK TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Block Stock,
    D_RPT TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Today receipt
    D_ISS TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Day issues
    TL_FL(2) TYPE C,
    STATUS(4) TYPE C,
END OF TY_MTL,
BEGIN OF TY_OPG     , " Opening File
       SPMON TYPE SPMON,   " Period to analyze - month
       WERKS TYPE WERKS_D, " Plant
       MATNR TYPE MATNR,   " Material No
       BASME TYPE MEINS,
       MZUBB TYPE MZUBB,   " Receipt Quantity
       WZUBB TYPE WZUBB,
       MAGBB TYPE MAGBB,   " Issues Quantity
       WAGBB TYPE WAGBB,
END OF TY_OPG,
DATA :
       T_M TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_MTL INITIAL SIZE 0,
       WA_M TYPE TY_MTL,
       T_O TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_OPG INITIAL SIZE 0,
       WA_O TYPE TY_OPG.
DATA: smonth1      TYPE spmon.
SELECT
a~matnr
a~mtart
a~matkl
a~meins
b~werks
INTO TABLE t_m FROM mara AS a
INNER JOIN marc AS b
ON a~matnr = b~matnr
* WHERE a~mtart EQ s_mtart
WHERE a~matkl IN s_matkl
AND b~werks IN s_werks
AND b~matnr IN s_matnr   .
endif.
SELECT spmon
       werks
       matnr
       basme
       mzubb
       WZUBB
       magbb
       wagbb
        FROM s031 INTO TABLE t_o
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_m
        WHERE matnr = t_m-matnr
        AND werks IN s_werks
          AND spmon le smonth1
          AND basme = t_m-meins.

Performance Issue in Query using = and =

Hi,
I have a performance issue in using condition like:
SELECT * FROM A WHERE ITEM_NO>='M-1130' AND ITEM_NO<='M-9999'.
Item_No is a varchar2 field and the field contains Numberical as well as string values.
Can anyone help to solve the issue.
Thanks and Regards

How can you say it is a performance issue with the condition? Do you have execution plan? If yes, post it between [pre] and [/pre] tags. Like this.
[pre]SQL> explain plan for
2 select sysdate
3 from dual
4 /
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display)
2 /
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 1546270724
| Id | Operation        | Name | Rows | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      |     1 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | FAST DUAL       |      |     1 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
8 rows selected.
SQL>
[/pre]

MacBook Pro performance issues w/2nd monitor and FCP7

I have this MacBook Pro bought brand-new in January 2010:
Model Name: MacBook Pro
Model Identifier: MacBookPro5,2
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 3.06 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 6 MB
Memory: 8 GB
Bus Speed: 1.07 GHz
and until today had never attached a second monitor to it. Today I hooked up my Samsung 24" to do some dual screen editing in Final Cut 7.0.3. I was unable to play back my video at full speed in the second monitor, and after a few seconds of skippy playback I'd get that error message about unable to play back video at full speed and to check my RT settings. I was using a Mini DisplayPort to DVI adapter. My computer has no issues playing the video in the laptop's monitor at any resolution and any quality settings (I've never changed the RT settings or anything else in the menu ever but I tried every combination this time). I then tried using my TV as a 2nd monitor with an HDMI adapter. Same performance issues. I then tried my friend's newer 13" MBP 8,1 and it performed flawlessly with the same project & footage. I feel like my $3,000 computer should outperform a $1,200 one even if mine is a year and a half older. Any advice?
Chris

Wow, you posted this perfectly to coincide with an identical problem, albeit using Logic Pro 9.1.5 rather than FCP.
Last week, I purchased a 23" external monitor to use alongside my "flagship" 2011 15" hi-res, 2.3 i7 Macbook Pro with 8Gb of RAM.
It is connected via a mini-DVI to D-sub analog (not that that should matter?) and all appeared fine.
The first issue I had was with my MBP's fan now running CONSTANTLY, when I have the second monitor attached. Even when the machine is completely idle.
When using the machine to record audio, this is a fairly hefty problem and not something I had anticipated - indeed why would I anticipate such a thing?
What is far, far worse though is that over the last few days I have had repeated problems with performance drop-outs and errors in Logic and I have trying to fathom out why. Realising that the only major system change made, was the above monitor connection, I ran some tests.
I restarted my MBP, no other apps were running and with my new 23" monitor attached acting as main display with MBP built in display on as secondary
I loaded up a fairly demanding Logic project which was hitting 40% to 60% CPU usage when using the built in MBP display last week
I ran activity monitor and had CPU usage history open
The above project now repeatedly overloads and playback halts in a given 8 bar section - with CPU at 80% most of the time
I disconnected the external display, no shut down, I just let the machine switch to the built in 15".
Started the same project, the same 8 bar section and hey presto - CPU usage back down to 40% to 60%
The above was reflected in the CPU usage history with the graph showing CPU use down by about a half, when running this Logic project WITHOUT the external display.
There is a very useful benchmark Logic project that has been used as a test by many users to gauge Logic performance on given Apple hardware.
The project has about 100 tracks pre-configured with CPU intensive plugins, designed to tax the CPU.
The idea is that you load up the project with tracks muted, press play and then unmute the tracks steadily until Logic us unable to play contiunously because of a system performance error.
On my MBP, with the external monitor NOT attached, I can play back around 50 of the audio tracks in this benchmark project.
With the monitor attached, I can get about 22 tracks playing.... which is actually a far worse a performance drop (-50% I think!?) than with the first example!
I did also try with just the external monitor attached and not the MBP display and performance was about 10% better than with dual monitors - so still extremely poor, to say the least.
This machine is the flagship MBP and has a dedicated AMD Radeon HD6750 GPU which should take care of most if not ALL graphics processing - I mean it's capable of running some pretty demanding games!
Putting aside the issue of constant fan noise, there is no reason AT ALL, why using an external monitor should tax the i7 CPU this way - it's not as though Logic is graphically demanding... far from it.
I am on 10.6.8, Logic 9.1.5, all apps up to date via "Software Update".
I will of course, be contacting Apple...

ADF Table filter issue with OR or AND input value

Hi all,
adf:table filterable fields for OR or AND input value not works. Actually One of column is for State and it has "OR" value for -> OREGON State.
and I tried using filterModel and queryListener for table attribute. But I am not getting exact clue where I need to fix for this issue. Any suggestion and help is appreciated greatly.
jdev version 11.1.1.3
Thank you.
- Robin

Something like this might work for the one case:
public void handleQuery(QueryEvent queryEvent){
    // Replace the OR with an equivalent condition
    Map m =
      ((FilterableQueryDescriptor) (queryEvent.getDescriptor())).getFilterCriteria();
    for (Map.Entry entry: (Collection<Map.Entry>) m.entrySet())
      if (entry.getValue() != null &&
          StringUtils.equalsIgnoreCase(entry.getValue().toString(), "OR"))
        entry.setValue("O AND _R");
    // Process The Query
    ELUtils.invokeMethod("#{bindings.VOQuery.processQuery}",
                         QueryEvent.class, queryEvent);
    // Put the OR back
    for (Map.Entry entry: (Collection<Map.Entry>) m.entrySet())
      if (entry.getValue() != null &&
          StringUtils.equalsIgnoreCase(entry.getValue().toString(),
                                       "O AND _R"))
        entry.setValue("OR");
}

Performance issue related to OWM? Oracle version is 10.2.0.4

The optimizer picks hash join instead of nested loop for the queries with OWM tables, which causes full table scan everywhere. I wonder if it happens in your databases as well, or just us. If you did and knew what to do to solve this, it would be great appriciated! I did log in a SR to Oracle but it usually takes months to reach the solution.
Thanks for any possible answers!

Ha, sounded like you knew what I was talking about :)
I thought the issue must've had something to do with OWM because some complicate queries have no performance issue while they're regular tables. There's a batch job which took an hour to run now it takes 4.5 hours. I just rewrote the job to move the queries from OWM to regular tables, it takes 20 minutes. However today when I tried to get explain plans for some queries involve regular tables with large amount of data, I got the same full table scan problem with hash join. So I'm convinced that it probably is not OWM. But the patch for removing bug fix didn't help with the situation here.
I was hoping that other companies might have this problem and had a way to work around. If it's not OWM, I'm surprised that this only happens in our system.
Thanks for the reply anyway!

Tables for Fiels Fixed Value and Variable Value

Hi,
Can any one tell me where the actual fixed and variable costs are stored in which table and also the planned costs. I have checked it, but it is showing RKPLN as data structure. We are doing development report where in standard Cost Center Report we need to have break up of fixed and variable cost. Please guide me where exactly these fields are stored in which table. its very urgent.

Hi,
In regard to the tables for planned data please do a search of the forum as this question has already been asked a few times. E.g. here:
CO PLANNING TABLES
In regard to fixed / variable actual costs: these are not stored in separate tables. If a posting contains fixed and variable portions, for example postings resulting from splitting (KSS2), then the fixed portion is stored in the COEP- WKFBTR (line items) and COSS-WKF* fields (summary items). Please observe SAP note 192107 on this issue.
Regards
Karl

Table relation for material and characteristics value

Hi,
I am looking for the tables which contain the material and characteristics values. e.g. For a particular material what are the characteristics available and what are their uniq values. It will be great if you could provide me the tables name along with the link key (foreign key) between the material no and it's characteristics. Even though I have tried ausp & other tables but I could not find the uniq for a particular material. All answers are appreciable.
Thanks in advance..
Pradeep

Hi Pradeep,
You can check these tables
INOB, KSSK, KLAH, CABN, CAWN and AUSP.
Cheers
VJ
If it helps dont forget to mark points

VC - Compile and Deploy performance issues related to UserID

Dear Guru's,
I'm currently working at a customer where a small team of 4 is working with VC 7.0.
One user has very long Compile and Deploy times. We first thought that it was related to his workstation.
Then one of the other guys logged in on his PC and run the compile + deploy ant then it suddenly takes seconds again.
So we created a new userID for this user who has the issues "<oldUI>+test" and suddenly all is back to normal for him.
But, now here it comes that we deleted his old userID and created it again, but the issue is still there.
So my assumption is that there is some kind of faulty record or index or something other strange linked to his userID.
What can this be and how can we solve it?
Thanks in advance!
Benjamin

Hi Anja,
We use VC on 7.0 and we do not have any integration with the DTR.
So in other words we use the default way of working with VC.
The user had his models in his Personal folder then moved it to the Public folder so that other colleagues could see/try them as well. It doesn't matter where the model is stored (public or personal) as long if this specific UID is used compiling/deploying goes very slow... the log files do not give much info, why this happens...
Cheers,
Benjamin

Performance ISSUE related to AGGREGATE

hi Gem's can anybody give the list of issue which we can face related to AGGREGATE maintananece in support project.
Its very urgent .plz.........respond to my issue.its a urgent request.
any link any thing plz send me
my mail id is
[email protected]

Hi,
Try this.
"---" sign is the valuation of the aggregate. You can say -3 is the valuation of the aggregate design and usage. ++ means that its compression is good and access is also more (in effect, performance is good). If you check its compression ratio, it must be good. -- means the compression ratio is not so good and access is also not so good (performance is not so good).The more is the positives...more is useful the aggregate and more it satisfies the number of queries. The greater the number of minus signs, the worse the evaluation of the aggregate. The larger the number of plus signs, the better the evaluation of the aggregate.
if "-----" then it means it just an overhead. Aggregate can potentially be deleted and "+++++" means Aggregate is potentially very useful.
Refer.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/b8/23813b310c4a0ee10000000a114084/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/60/f0fb411e255f24e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Run your query in RSRT and run the query in the debug mode. Select "Display Aggregates Found" and "Do not use cache" in the debug mode. This will tell you if it hit any aggregates while running. If it does not show any aggregates, you might want to redesign your aggregates for the query.
use tool RSDDK_CHECK_AGGREGATE in se38 to check for the corrupt aggregates
If aggregates contain incorrect data, you must regenerate them.
Note 646402 - Programs for checking aggregates (as of BW 3.0B SP15)
Check SE11 > table RSDDAGGRDIR . You can find the last callup in the table.
Generate Report in RSRT
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/74/e8caaea70d7a41b03dc82637ae0fa5/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cccad390-0201-0010-5093-fd9ec8157802
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4c0ab590-0201-0010-bd9a-8332d8b4f09c
/people/juergen.noe/blog/2007/12/13/overview-important-bi-performance-transactions
/people/prakash.darji/blog/2006/01/26/query-optimization
Cube Performance
/thread/785462 [original link is broken]
Thanks,
JituK

Performance issue related to Wrapper and variable value retrievel

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for