Plz help in tuning this query......

SELECT "LAN","VEF_REF_NO","VF_TYPE_CODE","APPLICANT_TYPE","MANDATORY","OPTIONAL","COMPLETE","DT_COMPLETED","REFIRENO","ROLE","USER_ID","DT_LASTUPDATED","TEMPLATEFIRED"
FROM T_VER_STRATEGY_DETAILS M
WHERE VF_TYPE_CODE =1 AND
APPLICANT_TYPE ='A' AND
DT_LASTUPDATED=
(SELECT MAX(DT_LASTUPDATED)
FROM T_VER_STRATEGY_DETAILS
WHERE LAN = M.LAN AND
VF_TYPE_CODE =1 AND APPLICANT_TYPE ='A')
This seems to be a correlated query.
i tried using combined index on
(VF_TYPE_CODE ,APPLICANT_TYPE ,DT_LASTUPDATED)
and another index on
(LAN,VF_TYPE_CODE ,APPLICANT_TYPE ) but the plan or cost remains unchained.
plz help

[url http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=501834&tstart=0]When your query takes too long...

Similar Messages

Plz help me design this query

Hi,
Can you’ll please help me with this query.
Here is a little bit of background:
One title can have multiple items associated with it.
Table: TITLE has the master list of titles. TITLE_ID is the primary key.
Table: ITEM has the master list of all items. ITEM_ID is the primary. This table also has the TITLE_ID which stores title for this item.
Table: ITEM_STATUS has fields ITEM_ID and STATUS_ID. This field contains statuses for items. But not all items contained in the table ITEM are in this table.
I want to find TITLE_ID’s whose all items (all ITEM_ID in table ITEM having same value for TITLE_ID) have a particular status (for example STATUS_ID = 2) in table ITEM_STATUS.
Let’s say TITLE_ID = 1 has 5 items in table ITEM_ID and only 4 items out of it in table ITEM_STATUS with STATUS_ID = 2, then this TITLE_ID should not come. OR
Let’s say TITLE_ID = 1 has 5 items in table ITEM_ID and all these 5 items are in table ITEM_STATUS but only 1 has STATUS_ID = 2, then this TITLE_ID should also not come
In the above case only if all 5 items are contained in table ITEM_STATUS have STATUS_ID = 2 then this TITLE_ID should be reported by the query.
What should be the query like for this one, I am fairly new to SQL so plz guide me.
Thank you,
Raja

I haven't tested the query below. Try it and let me know for any issues:
SELECT DISTINCT t.title_id
 FROM title t,
 item i,
 item_status its
WHERE t.title_id = i.title_id
 AND i.item_id = its.item_id
 AND NOT EXISTS (
 SELECT 1
 FROM item_status its1
 WHERE its1.item_id = i.item_id
 AND status_id <> 'YOUR_ITEM_STATUS'
 )

Plz help to make this query......very urgent

I ve two tables 
 
First one is grn_dtl containing following fields 

item_code ent_dt qty doc_no 
11001318 09/09/2003 5 56300501 
11001318 11/09/2004 9 56300502 
11001318 12/05/2005 2 56300503 
11001319 22/06/2004 0 56300504 
11001320 09/06/2005 0 56300505 
11001320 11/08/2004 8 56300506 
11001320 30/05/2005 4 56300507 
11001320 21/06/2003 1 56300508 
11001321 25/09/2004 1 56300509 
11001321 15/07/2004 1 56300510 
11001321 01/08/2004 2 56300511 
11001322 02/06/2004 1 56300512 
11001322 22/06/2004 2 56300513 
11001323 12/09/2004 1 56300514 
11001323 08/05/2004 4 56300515 
11001323 17/08/2004 5 56300516 
11001323 28/06/2004 2 56300517 
 
second one is item_mst containing following fields 
 

item_code description leadtim kanbandate 
11001318 aaaaaaaaaaa 15 22/04/2004 
11001319 aaaaaaaaaaa 15 02/12/2004 
11001320 aaaaaaaaaaa 15 14/07/2005 
11001321 aaaaaaaaaaa 15 23/02/2004 
11001322 aaaaaaaaaaa 15 05/10/2004 
11001323 aaaaaaaaaaa 15 17/05/2004 
11001324 aaaaaaaaaaa 15 27/12/2004 
11001325 aaaaaaaaaaa 15 07/08/2004 
 
From the above two tables I want the combine SQL query which will display item_code its description ,kanbandate from item_mst table and will also display the minimum ent_dt of each corresponding item_code alongwith the qty and doc_no.the item_code should not be repeated . 
I want to run the query from sql query analyzer 
the result should be like this 
item_code desc ent_dt qty doc_no
 
11001318 aaaaaaaaaaa 09/09/2003 5 56300501 
11001319 aaaaaaaaaaa 22/06/2004 0 56300504 
11001320 aaaaaaaaaaa 21/06/2003 1 56300508 
11001321 aaaaaaaaaaa 15/07/2004 1 56300510 
11001322 aaaaaaaaaaa 02/06/2004 1 56300513 
11001323 aaaaaaaaaaa 08/05/2004 4 56300515 
 
 
plz help me out ASAP
null
Message was edited by:
aanchal_2008

can you try this,
SELECT DISTINCT im.item_code,
im.descR,
gd.ent_dt,
gd.qty,
gd.doc_no
FROM item_mst im,
grn_dtl gd
WHERE im.item_code = gd.item_code (+)
AND NOT EXISTS (
SELECT 'later detail'
FROM grn_dtl gd2
WHERE gd2.item_code = gd.item_code
AND gd2.ent_dt > gd.ent_dt)
ITEM_CODE DESCR ENT_DT QTY DOC_NO
11001318 aaaaaaaaaaa 2/12/2005 6 563005
11001319 aaaaaaaaaaa 6/22/2004 0 563005
11001320 aaaaaaaaaaa 6/9/2005 0 563005
11001321 aaaaaaaaaaa 12/5/2005 5 563005
11001322 aaaaaaaaaaa 6/22/2004 2 563005
11001323 aaaaaaaaaaa 9/12/2004 1 563005
11001324 aaaaaa
11001325 aaaaaa
8 rows selected

Help in Tuning this Query

Hi,
I have a query in my proj where the same table is looked up twice in the same query.
Can anybody suggest in improving the performance of this query?
select * from table1 a1 where (a1.column1, a1.column2, a1.column3, a1.column4, a1.column5, a1.column6, a1.column7, a1.column8, a1.column9,
a1.column10) in ( select a2.column1, a2.column2, a2.column3, a2.column4, a2.column5, a2.column6, a2.column7, a2.column8, a2.column9,
a2.column10 from table1 a2 where column20 = '<condn>')
The table1 used here is same in outer query as well as the sub query. this is a example of what we use here, and the table1 contains 30 million rows. Though, creating index with 10 columns can be a option, we already have a unique index with 11 columns(which includes 10 from this query) and will that be helpful in anyway? or the same existing index can be forced?
Thanks a lot for ur time

Depending on the selectivity of column20 I am not sure Index is the best way to go. It might perform better with two full scans and a hash-join.
Anyway, I do prefer the syntax:
select /*+ leading(a2) */ a1.*
from table1 a1, table1 a2
where a2.column20 = '<condn>'
and a1.column1 = a2.column1
and a1.column2 = a2.column2
and a1.column3 = a2.column3
and a1.column4 = a2.column4
and a1.column5 = a2.column5
and a1.column6 = a2.column6
and a1.column7 = a2.column7
and a1.column8 = a2.column8
and a1.column9 = a2.column9
and a1.column10 = a2.column10;I've added a leading hint to tell oracle that the start table is a2. Might be useless.
Ensure your stats are up to date. You might need histograms here if your column20 is skewed.
Hope this helps,
François
Edited by: Francois Berger on Oct 24, 2008 1:47 AM

Help on tuning this query

Hi all i have this query:
SELECT VTA.CO_VENDEDOR
,VTA.NB_VENDEDOR
,VTA.CO_CLASE_CLIENTE
,VTA.DE_CLASE_CLIENTE
,VTA.CO_CLIENTE
,VTA.NB_CLIENTE
,VTA.MN_VENDIDO
,NVL(DEV.MN_DEVUELTO,0) MN_DEVUELTO
,VTA.MN_VENDIDO - NVL(DEV.MN_DEVUELTO,0) MN_NETO_VENDIDO
,NVL(COB.MN_COBRADO,0) MN_COBRADO
,NVL(COB.MN_DESCUENTO,0) MN_DESCUENTO
,NVL(COB.MN_COBRADO,0) + NVL(COB.MN_DESCUENTO,0) MN_COBRADO_MAS_DESCUENTO
FROM (SELECT FCL.CTV_CO_CLASE_ORGANIZACION CO_CLASE_CLIENTE
,FCL.CTV_DE_CLASE_ORGANIZACION DE_CLASE_CLIENTE
,FCL.CO_ORGANIZACION CO_CLIENTE
,FCL.ORG_NB_CLIENTE NB_CLIENTE
,FCL.PER_CO_IDENTIFICACION_VENDEDOR CO_VENDEDOR
,FCL.PER_NB_PRIMER_NOMBRE_VENDEDOR||' '||
FCL.PER_NB_PRIMER_APELLIDO_VEND NB_VENDEDOR
,SUM((CA_PRODUCTO * (PR_PRODUCTO - NVL(PR_DESCUENTO_PRODUCTO,0))) * (1 - NVL(PC_DESCUENTO,0))) MN_VENDIDO
FROM S04_FACTURA_CLIENTE_TOTAL_R FCL
,S04_FACTURA_CLIENTE_PRD_TOT FPR
 ,(SELECT FCP.FAC_ID_FACTURA
,SUM(DDC.MN_DEBITO_CREDITO) /
SUM(FCP.CA_PRODUCTO * (FCP.PR_PRODUCTO - NVL(FCP.PR_DESCUENTO_PRODUCTO,0))) PC_DESCUENTO
 FROM S04_DOCUMENTO_DEBITO_CREDITO_R DDC
,S04_FACTURA_CLIENTE_PRD_TOT FCP
 WHERE DDC.ID_DOCUMENTO_REFERENCIA = FCP.FAC_ID_FACTURA
AND DDC.TDC_IN_DEBITO_CREDITO = 'C'
GROUP BY FCP.FAC_ID_FACTURA) DCT
WHERE FCL.ID_REGISTRO = FPR.FAC_ID_FACTURA
AND DCT.FAC_ID_FACTURA (+) = FPR.FAC_ID_FACTURA
AND FCL.FE_EMISION BETWEEN to_date('01112009','ddmmyyyy') AND to_date('29112009','ddmmyyyy')
AND FCL.ORG_ID_CLIENTE = NVL(NULL,FCL.ORG_ID_CLIENTE)
AND FCL.PER_ID_VENDEDOR = NVL(7647771,FCL.PER_ID_VENDEDOR)
 AND FCL.CTV_CO_ESTADO_DOCUMENTO = 'EM'
AND FCL.UBG_ID_UBICACION_CLIENTE in (SELECT ID_REGISTRO
FROM S00_UBICACION_GEOGRAFICA
START WITH ID_REGISTRO = nvl(NULL, FCL.UBG_ID_UBICACION_CLIENTE)
CONNECT BY PRIOR ID_REGISTRO = UBG_ID_UBICACION_PADRE)
GROUP BY FCL.CTV_CO_CLASE_ORGANIZACION
,FCL.CTV_DE_CLASE_ORGANIZACION
,FCL.CO_ORGANIZACION
,FCL.ORG_NB_CLIENTE
,PER_CO_IDENTIFICACION_VENDEDOR
,PER_NB_PRIMER_NOMBRE_VENDEDOR||' '||
PER_NB_PRIMER_APELLIDO_VEND) VTA
,(SELECT NDC .CTV_CO_CLASE_ORGANIZACION CO_CLASE_CLIENTE
,NDC.CTV_DE_CLASE_ORGANIZACION DE_CLASE_CLIENTE
,NDC.CO_CLIENTE
,NDC.ORG_NB_CLIENTE NB_CLIENTE
,FCL.PER_CO_IDENTIFICACION_VENDEDOR CO_VENDEDOR
,FCL.PER_NB_PRIMER_NOMBRE_VENDEDOR||' '||
FCL.PER_NB_PRIMER_APELLIDO_VEND NB_VENDEDOR
,SUM(CA_PRODUCTO * (PR_PRODUCTO - NVL(PR_DESCUENTO_PRODUCTO,0))) MN_DEVUELTO
FROM S06_NOTA_DEBITO_CREDITO_TOT_R NDC
 ,S06_DETALLE_NOTA_DEB_CRED_TOT DND
,S04_FACTURA_CLIENTE_TOTAL_R FCL
 WHERE NDC.ID_REGISTRO = DND.NDC_ID_NOTA_DEBITO_CREDITO
AND NDC.CTV_CO_TIPO_DOCUMENTO = SK00_BUSCAR.F_VCT('CO_TIPO_DOCUMENTO_NOTA_CREDITO_FISCAL')
AND NDC.CTV_CO_ESTADO_DOCUMENTO = SK00_BUSCAR.F_VCT('CO_ESTADO_DOCUMENTO_EMITIDO')
 AND NDC.FE_EMISION BETWEEN to_date('01112009','ddmmyyyy') AND to_date('29112009','ddmmyyyy')
 AND (NDC.CTV_CO_MOTIVO_NOTA = SK00_BUSCAR.F_VCT('CO_MOTIVO_NOE_DEVOLUCION')
 OR NDC.CTV_CO_MOTIVO_NOTA = SK00_BUSCAR.F_VCT('CO_MOTIVO_AJUSTE_PRECIO_NCD'))
AND NDC.ORG_ID_CLIENTE = NVL(NULL,NDC.ORG_ID_CLIENTE)
AND FCL.ID_REGISTRO = NDC.FAC_ID_FACTURA
 AND FCL.CTV_CO_ESTADO_DOCUMENTO = 'EM'
AND FCL.UBG_ID_UBICACION_CLIENTE in (SELECT ID_REGISTRO
FROM S00_UBICACION_GEOGRAFICA
START WITH ID_REGISTRO = nvl(NULL, FCL.UBG_ID_UBICACION_CLIENTE)
CONNECT BY PRIOR ID_REGISTRO = UBG_ID_UBICACION_PADRE)
GROUP BY NDC.CTV_CO_CLASE_ORGANIZACION
,NDC.CTV_DE_CLASE_ORGANIZACION
,NDC.CO_CLIENTE
,NDC.ORG_NB_CLIENTE
,FCL.PER_CO_IDENTIFICACION_VENDEDOR
,FCL.PER_NB_PRIMER_NOMBRE_VENDEDOR||' '||
FCL.PER_NB_PRIMER_APELLIDO_VEND) DEV
,(SELECT RCD .CTV_CO_CLASE_ORGANIZACION CO_CLASE_CLIENTE
,RCD.CTV_DE_CLASE_ORGANIZACION DE_CLASE_CLIENTE
,RCD.CO_ORGANIZACION CO_CLIENTE
,RCD.ORG_NB_DISTRIBUIDOR NB_CLIENTE
,FCL.PER_CO_IDENTIFICACION_VENDEDOR CO_VENDEDOR
,FCL.PER_NB_PRIMER_NOMBRE_VENDEDOR||' '||
FCL.PER_NB_PRIMER_APELLIDO_VEND NB_VENDEDOR
,SUM(RCD.MN_DESCUENTO) MN_DESCUENTO
,SUM(DECODE(SIGN(RCO.MN_COBRADO_ANTES - IVA.MN_IVA)
,-1
,RCD.MN_ABONO - ABS(RCO.MN_COBRADO_ANTES - IVA.MN_IVA)
,RCD.MN_ABONO)) MN_COBRADO
FROM S06_RECIBO_COBRO_DOC_TOTAL_R RCD
,S04_FACTURA_CLIENTE_TOTAL_R FCL
,(SELECT ID_DOCUMENTO_REFERENCIA FAC_ID_FACTURA
,NVL(SUM(MN_DEBITO_CREDITO),0) MN_IVA
FROM S04_DOCUMENTO_DEBITO_CREDITO_R
WHERE TDC_CO_TIPO_DEBITO_CREDITO = SK00_BUSCAR.F_VCT('CO_TIPO_DEBITO_IVA')
GROUP BY ID_DOCUMENTO_REFERENCIA) IVA
,(SELECT ID_REFERENCIA FAC_ID_FACTURA
,NVL(SUM(MN_ABONO),0) MN_COBRADO_ANTES
FROM S06_RECIBO_COBRO_DOC_TOTAL_R
WHERE FE_EMISION < to_date('01112009','ddmmyyyy')
GROUP BY ID_REFERENCIA) RCO
 WHERE RCD.CTV_CO_ESTADO_DOCUMENTO = SK00_BUSCAR.F_VCT('CO_ESTADO_DOCUMENTO_EMITIDO')
 AND RCD.FE_EMISION BETWEEN to_date('01112009','ddmmyyyy') AND to_date('29112009','ddmmyyyy')
AND RCD.ORG_ID_ORGANIZACION = NVL(NULL,RCD.ORG_ID_ORGANIZACION)
AND FCL.CTV_CO_ESTADO_DOCUMENTO = 'EM'
 AND FCL.ID_REGISTRO = RCD.ID_REFERENCIA
AND FCL.UBG_ID_UBICACION_CLIENTE in (SELECT ID_REGISTRO
FROM S00_UBICACION_GEOGRAFICA
START WITH ID_REGISTRO = nvl(NULL, FCL.UBG_ID_UBICACION_CLIENTE)
CONNECT BY PRIOR ID_REGISTRO = UBG_ID_UBICACION_PADRE)
AND IVA.FAC_ID_FACTURA (+) = FCL.ID_REGISTRO
AND RCO.FAC_ID_FACTURA (+) = FCL.ID_REGISTRO
GROUP BY RCD.CTV_CO_CLASE_ORGANIZACION
,RCD.CTV_DE_CLASE_ORGANIZACION
,RCD.CO_ORGANIZACION
,RCD.ORG_NB_DISTRIBUIDOR
,FCL.PER_CO_IDENTIFICACION_VENDEDOR
,FCL.PER_NB_PRIMER_NOMBRE_VENDEDOR||' '||
FCL.PER_NB_PRIMER_APELLIDO_VEND) COB
WHERE VTA.CO_CLIENTE = DEV.CO_CLIENTE (+)
AND VTA.CO_VENDEDOR = DEV.CO_VENDEDOR (+)
AND VTA.CO_CLIENTE = COB.CO_CLIENTE (+)
AND VTA.CO_VENDEDOR = COB.CO_VENDEDOR (+)
ORDER BY VTA.NB_VENDEDOR
,VTA.CO_CLIENTE
Is there a way i can influence the join method on this query ...?
It's an XE DB.
Regards, Luis ...!

THIS IS THE PLAN:
SQL> /
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=ALL_ROWS (Cost=79006 Card=1 Bytes
=253)
1 0 SORT (ORDER BY) (Cost=79006 Card=1 Bytes=253)
2 1 HASH JOIN (OUTER) (Cost=79005 Card=1 Bytes=253)
3 2 HASH JOIN (OUTER) (Cost=78538 Card=1 Bytes=211)
4 3 VIEW (Cost=78478 Card=1 Bytes=182)
5 4 HASH (GROUP BY) (Cost=78478 Card=1 Bytes=232)
6 5 FILTER
7 6 HASH JOIN (OUTER) (Cost=78469 Card=1 Bytes=232
8 7 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'T04_FACTUR
A_PRODUCTO' (TABLE) (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=46)
9 8 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=25 Card=1 Bytes=213)
10 9 VIEW OF 'V04_FACTURA_CLIENTE_TOTAL_R' (V
IEW) (Cost=23 Card=1 Bytes=167)
11 10 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=23 Card=1 Bytes=284
12 11 NESTED LOOPS (OUTER) (Cost=23 Card=1
Bytes=278)
13 12 HASH JOIN (SEMI) (Cost=23 Card=1 B
ytes=272)
14 13 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=17 Card=1 Byt
es=259)
15 14 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=16 Card=1 B
ytes=218)
16 15 NESTED LOOPS (OUTER) (Cost=1
6 Card=1 Bytes=212)
17 16 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=15 Card
=1 Bytes=179)
18 17 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=15 Ca
rd=1 Bytes=173)
19 18 NESTED LOOPS (OUTER) (
Cost=14 Card=1 Bytes=162)
20 19 NESTED LOOPS (OUTER)
(Cost=14 Card=1 Bytes=156)
21 20 NESTED LOOPS (OUTE
R) (Cost=14 Card=1 Bytes=150)
22 21 NESTED LOOPS (OU
TER) (Cost=14 Card=1 Bytes=144)
23 22 NESTED LOOPS (
Cost=14 Card=1 Bytes=105)
24 23 SORT (UNIQUE
) (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=13)
25 24 TABLE ACCE
SS (FULL) OF 'T00_GRUPO_DATO_USUARIO_ACTIVO' (TABLE (TEMP))
(Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=13)
26 23 TABLE ACCESS
(BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'T04_FACTURA' (TABLE) (Cost=11 Card=1 B
ytes=92)
27 26 INDEX (RAN
GE SCAN) OF 'I04_FAC_FE_EMISION' (INDEX) (Cost=10 Card=2)
28 22 TABLE ACCESS (
BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'T03_EMPRESA_SUCURSAL' (TABLE) (Cost=0 Ca
rd=1 Bytes=39)
29 28 INDEX (RANGE
SCAN) OF 'I03_EMS_EMP' (INDEX) (Cost=0 Card=1)
30 21 INDEX (UNIQUE SC
AN) OF 'PK_PRY' (INDEX (UNIQUE)) (Cost=0 Card=1 Bytes=6)
31 20 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN
) OF 'PK_CAJ' (INDEX (UNIQUE)) (Cost=0 Card=1 Bytes=6)
32 19 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN)
OF 'PK_PEC' (INDEX (UNIQUE)) (Cost=0 Card=1 Bytes=6)
33 18 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX
ROWID) OF 'T00_CONTENIDO_TABLA_VIRTUAL' (TABLE) (Cost=1 Car
d=1 Bytes=11)
34 33 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN)
OF 'PK_CTV' (INDEX (UNIQUE)) (Cost=0 Card=1)
SORRY EXPLAIN OUTPUT TRUNCATED DUE TO SPACE RESTRICION .....
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I believe there must be a way to influence on the tha costly HASH JOIN operation
SQL> SPOOL OFF

Plz help me with this query

i need to get each manager name, his department name and for each year that is for 81,82,83,84 count of employee's under that manager from emp and dept tables .
thanks in advance
select distinct deptno, TO_CHAR (HIREDATE, 'YY'), count(*) from emp group by TO_CHAR(HIREDATE, 'YY'), DEPTNO ORDER BY TO_CHAR(HIREDATE, 'YY'), DEPTNO;
the above query returns me count of employees ,year and deptno
SELECT DISTINCT E2.ENAME , E1.ENAME, E1.DEPTNO, E1.MGR, E1.EMPNO, E1.SAL, D.DNAME, D.LOC FROM EMP E1, EMP E2, DEPT D WHERE E1.MGR = E2.EMPNO AND E1.DEPTNO = D.DEPTNO ORDER BY E1.DEPTNO;
this query returned me manager names and employees under them
Message was edited by:
user450660

At that point you're not too far off, you have most of what you need. In general, any time you see the use of DISTINCT it's a sign that either your query or your data model isn't designed quite right.
SELECT m.ename,
       d.dname,
       TO_CHAR (e.hiredate, 'YY') AS hire_year,
       COUNT(*) AS emp_count
FROM emp e, emp m, dept d
WHERE e.mgr = m.empno
   AND m.deptno = d.deptno
GROUP BY
       m.ename,
       d.dname,
       TO_CHAR (e.hiredate, 'YY');

Plz help me in this query for the tree

hi All
I want to bulid tree that start with for example
schema name "scott"
then table "dept,emp
then ename in table emp
root scott
parent dept
child emp_name
please help me in the query ?

user222 wrote:
any help my dearsIf you can draw one simple tree example. Then it will be easy to create query. Because i am confuse about the output. Just draw one example of your desired output tree. Then it will help to find solution.
And while writing query or any example so use the 6 digit before and after your query or example to keep the formatting in orignal format. Otherwise it becomes hard to read.
For more information see FAQ on right corner for page.
-Ammad

solved need help in tuning this Query

hi frs,
i have created a query like this
pls help
Regards
Rajesh
Message was edited by:
Rajesh.mani
Message was edited by:
Rajesh.mani

Code and explain plan should be between [pre] and [/pre] or [code] and [/code] tags like this.
[pre]Code[/pre]An now explain plan
[code]Execution plan
[/code]
Cheers
Sarma.

Please help me tuning this query...

Hi all,
Can any body suggest some changes (synthatic) so that it can improve its performance... taking too much time...
This is a query used in oracle report...
SELECT distinct cc.seg1,cc.seg2,cc.seg3,cc.seg4,cc.seg5,cc.seg6,cc.seg7,cc.seg8,cc.code_combination_id code_comb_id,
 r.flex_validation_rule_name cv_rule,gl.currency_code currency1,
 (NVL (gjl.accounted_dr, 0) - NVL (gjl.accounted_cr, 0)) trans_amount,
 gjh.doc_sequence_value doc_num,
 gjs.user_je_source_name je_source, gjc.user_je_category_name je_category,
 fu.user_name last_updated_by,(NVL (gb.begin_balance_dr, 0)
 - NVL (gb.begin_balance_cr, 0))
 + (NVL (gb.period_net_dr_beq, 0)
 - NVL (gb.period_net_cr_beq, 0)) balance,
 gjh.last_update_date last_updated_date,gjl.effective_date
 FROM gl_code_combinations cc,
 fnd_flex_vdation_rules_vl r,
 fnd_flex_validation_rule_lines l,
 gl_je_headers gjh,
 gl_je_lines gjl,
 gl_balances gb,
 fnd_user fu,
 gl_je_categories gjc,
 gl_je_sources gjs,
 gl_ledgers gl
 WHERE cc.enabled_flag = 'Y'
 AND NVL (cc.end_date_active, SYSDATE + 1) > SYSDATE
 AND cc.chart_of_accounts_id = :p_chart_of_accounts_id
 AND r.id_flex_num = cc.chart_of_accounts_id
 AND r.id_flex_code = 'GL#'
 AND r.application_id = 101
 AND gjs.je_source_name=gjh.je_source
 AND gjc.je_category_name=gjh.je_category
 AND l.application_id = r.application_id
 AND gb.code_combination_id=cc.code_combination_id
 AND gjh.period_name=gb.period_name
 AND r.enabled_flag = 'Y'
 AND NVL (r.end_date_active, SYSDATE + 1) > SYSDATE
 AND l.id_flex_code = r.id_flex_code
 AND l.id_flex_num = r.id_flex_num
 AND l.flex_validation_rule_name = r.flex_validation_rule_name
 AND l.include_exclude_indicator = 'E'
 AND gjl.code_combination_id = gb.code_combination_id
 AND gjh.je_header_id = gjl.je_header_id
 AND gjh.status = 'P'
 AND gl.ledger_id=gjh.ledger_id
 and gl.ledger_id=:p_ledger_id
 AND gjh.last_updated_by = fu.user_id
 and (gjh.last_update_date,gjl.last_update_date)=(
 SELECT MAX (a.last_update_date) ,MAX(b.last_update_date)
 FROM gl_je_headers a, gl_je_lines b
 WHERE b.code_combination_id = cc.code_combination_id
 AND a.je_header_id = b.je_header_id
 AND a.status = 'P'
 AND ROWNUM = 1)
 and (NVL (gjl.accounted_dr, 0) - NVL (gjl.accounted_cr, 0))=(select (NVL (accounted_dr, 0) - NVL (accounted_cr, 0)) from gl_je_lines
 where je_header_id=gjh.je_header_id and code_combination_id=cc.code_combination_id and period_name=gjh.period_name and
 last_update_date=gjh.last_update_date and rownum=1)
 and (NVL (gb.begin_balance_dr, 0)
 - NVL (gb.begin_balance_cr, 0))
 + (NVL (gb.period_net_dr_beq, 0)
 - NVL (gb.period_net_cr_beq, 0))=(select max((NVL (begin_balance_dr, 0)
 - NVL (begin_balance_cr, 0))
 + (NVL (period_net_dr_beq, 0)
 - NVL (period_net_cr_beq, 0))) from gl_balances where code_combination_id=cc.code_combination_id
 and period_name=gb.period_name)
 and gjl.description=(select description from gl_je_lines where code_combination_id=cc.code_combination_id and
 je_header_id=gjh.je_header_id and period_name=gb.period_name and rownum=1)
 AND cc.seg1 BETWEEN NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_low, 1, 3),
 cc.seg1
 AND NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_high, 1, 3),
 cc.seg1
 AND cc.seg2 BETWEEN NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_low, 5, 4),
 cc.seg2
 AND NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_high, 5, 4),
 cc.seg2
 AND cc.seg3 BETWEEN NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_low, 10, 4),
 cc.segt3
 AND NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_high, 10, 4),
 cc.seg3
 AND cc.seg4 BETWEEN NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_low, 15, 3),
 cc.seg4
 AND NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_high, 15, 3),
 cc.seg4
 AND cc.seg5 BETWEEN NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_low, 19, 6),
 cc.seg5
 AND NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_high, 19, 6),
 cc.seg5
 AND cc.seg6 BETWEEN NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_low, 26, 4),
 cc.segment6
 AND NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_high, 26, 4),
 cc.seg6
 AND cc.seg7 BETWEEN NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_low, 31, 6),
 cc.seg7
 AND NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_high, 31, 6),
 cc.seg7
 AND cc.seg8 BETWEEN NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_low, 38, 6),
 cc.seg8
 AND NVL (SUBSTR (l.concatenated_segments_high, 38, 6),
 cc.seg8)Thanks for help
asp

Dear all,
the folliwing is explain plan for above query...
<ExplainPlan>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="0" operation="SELECT STATEMENT" optimizer="ALL_ROWS" cost="1,417" cardinality="1" bytes="477" cpu_cost="263,995,086" io_cost="1,385" time="18">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="1" operation="HASH" option="UNIQUE" cost="1,417" cardinality="1" bytes="477" cpu_cost="263,995,086" io_cost="1,385" time="18">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="2" operation="FILTER" filter_predicates="("GJH"."LAST_UPDATE_DATE","GJL"."LAST_UPDATE_DATE")= (SELECT MAX("A"."LAST_UPDATE_DATE"),MAX("B"."LAST_UPDATE_DATE") FROM "GL"."GL_JE_LINES" "B","GL"."GL_JE_HEADERS" "A" WHERE ROWNUM=1 AND "A"."JE_HEADER_ID"="B"."JE_HEADER_ID" AND "A"."STATUS"='P' AND "B"."CODE_COMBINATION_ID"=:B1) AND NVL("GJL"."ACCOUNTED_DR",0)-NVL("GJL"."ACCOUNTED_CR",0)= (SELECT NVL("ACCOUNTED_DR",0)-NVL("ACCOUNTED_CR",0) FROM "GL"."GL_JE_LINES" "GL_JE_LINES" WHERE ROWNUM=1 AND "PERIOD_NAME"=:B2 AND "CODE_COMBINATION_ID"=:B3 AND "JE_HEADER_ID"=:B4 AND "LAST_UPDATE_DATE"=:B5) AND NVL("GB"."BEGIN_BALANCE_DR",0)-NVL("GB"."BEGIN_BALANCE_CR",0)+(NVL("GB"."PERIOD_NET_DR_BEQ",0)-NVL("GB"."PERIOD_NET_CR_BEQ",0))= (SELECT MAX(NVL("BEGIN_BALANCE_DR",0)-NVL("BEGIN_BALANCE_CR",0)+(NVL("PERIOD_NET_DR_BEQ",0)-NVL("PERIOD_NET_CR_BEQ",0))) FROM "GL"."GL_BALANCES" "GL_BALANCES" WHERE "PERIOD_NAME"=:B6 AND "CODE_COMBINATION_ID"=:B7)">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="3" operation="NESTED LOOPS" cost="1,262" cardinality="1" bytes="477" cpu_cost="254,376,045" io_cost="1,231" time="16">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="4" operation="NESTED LOOPS" cost="1,261" cardinality="1" bytes="464" cpu_cost="254,366,853" io_cost="1,230" time="16">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="5" operation="NESTED LOOPS" cost="1,260" cardinality="1" bytes="433" cpu_cost="254,357,622" io_cost="1,229" time="16">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="6" operation="NESTED LOOPS" cost="1,259" cardinality="1" bytes="402" cpu_cost="254,348,331" io_cost="1,228" time="16">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="7" operation="NESTED LOOPS" cost="1,258" cardinality="1" bytes="350" cpu_cost="254,337,522" io_cost="1,227" time="16">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="8" operation="NESTED LOOPS" cost="1,239" cardinality="1" bytes="273" cpu_cost="254,166,811" io_cost="1,208" time="15">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="9" operation="HASH JOIN" cost="1,184" cardinality="1" bytes="248" cpu_cost="253,727,112" io_cost="1,153" access_predicates=""B"."ID_FLEX_NUM"="CC"."CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID"" filter_predicates=""CC"."SEGMENT1">=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_LOW",1,3),"CC"."SEGMENT1") AND "CC"."SEGMENT1"<=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_HIGH",1,3),"CC"."SEGMENT1") AND "CC"."SEGMENT2">=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_LOW",5,4),"CC"."SEGMENT2") AND "CC"."SEGMENT2"<=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_HIGH",5,4),"CC"."SEGMENT2") AND "CC"."SEGMENT3">=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_LOW",10,4),"CC"."SEGMENT3") AND "CC"."SEGMENT3"<=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_HIGH",10,4),"CC"."SEGMENT3") AND "CC"."SEGMENT4">=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_LOW",15,3),"CC"."SEGMENT4") AND "CC"."SEGMENT4"<=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_HIGH",15,3),"CC"."SEGMENT4") AND "CC"."SEGMENT5">=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_LOW",19,6),"CC"."SEGMENT5") AND "CC"."SEGMENT5"<=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_HIGH",19,6),"CC"."SEGMENT5") AND "CC"."SEGMENT6">=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_LOW",26,4),"CC"."SEGMENT6") AND "CC"."SEGMENT6"<=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_HIGH",26,4),"CC"."SEGMENT6") AND "CC"."SEGMENT7">=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_LOW",31,6),"CC"."SEGMENT7") AND "CC"."SEGMENT7"<=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_HIGH",31,6),"CC"."SEGMENT7") AND "CC"."SEGMENT8">=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_LOW",38,6),"CC"."SEGMENT8") AND "CC"."SEGMENT8"<=NVL(SUBSTR("L"."CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS_HIGH",38,6),"CC"."SEGMENT8")" time="15">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="1" id="10" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="APPLSYS" object_name="FND_FLEX_VALIDATION_RULE_LINES" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="3" cost="3" cardinality="1" bytes="119" cpu_cost="49,909" io_cost="3" filter_predicates=""L"."INCLUDE_EXCLUDE_INDICATOR"='E'" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="11" operation="NESTED LOOPS" cost="6" cardinality="1" bytes="189" cpu_cost="75,588" io_cost="6" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="12" operation="NESTED LOOPS" cost="3" cardinality="1" bytes="70" cpu_cost="25,679" io_cost="3" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="13" operation="NESTED LOOPS" cost="3" cardinality="1" bytes="39" cpu_cost="23,779" io_cost="3" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="2" id="14" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_LEDGERS" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="10" cost="1" cardinality="1" bytes="8" cpu_cost="8,541" io_cost="1" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
<PlanElement object_ID="3" id="15" operation="INDEX" option="UNIQUE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_LEDGERS_U2" object_type="INDEX (UNIQUE)" search_columns="1" cost="0" cardinality="1" cpu_cost="1,050" io_cost="0" access_predicates=""GL"."LEDGER_ID"=TO_NUMBER(:P_LEDGER_ID)" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
- <PlanElement object_ID="4" id="16" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="APPLSYS" object_name="FND_FLEX_VALIDATION_RULES" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="19" cost="2" cardinality="1" bytes="31" cpu_cost="15,238" io_cost="2" filter_predicates=""B"."ENABLED_FLAG"='Y' AND NVL("B"."END_DATE_ACTIVE",SYSDATE@!+1)>SYSDATE@!" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
<PlanElement object_ID="5" id="17" operation="INDEX" option="RANGE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="APPLSYS" object_name="FND_FLEX_VALIDATION_RULES_U1" object_type="INDEX (UNIQUE)" search_columns="3" cost="1" cardinality="1" cpu_cost="7,321" io_cost="1" access_predicates=""B"."APPLICATION_ID"=101 AND "B"."ID_FLEX_CODE"='GL#' AND "B"."ID_FLEX_NUM"=TO_NUMBER(:P_CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID)" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
<PlanElement object_ID="6" id="18" operation="INDEX" option="UNIQUE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="APPLSYS" object_name="FND_FLEX_VDATION_RULES_TL_U1" object_type="INDEX (UNIQUE)" search_columns="5" cost="0" cardinality="1" bytes="31" cpu_cost="1,900" io_cost="0" access_predicates=""T"."APPLICATION_ID"=101 AND "T"."ID_FLEX_CODE"='GL#' AND "T"."ID_FLEX_NUM"=TO_NUMBER(:P_CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID) AND "B"."FLEX_VALIDATION_RULE_NAME"="T"."FLEX_VALIDATION_RULE_NAME" AND "T"."LANGUAGE"=USERENV('LANG')" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
<PlanElement object_ID="7" id="19" operation="INDEX" option="RANGE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="APPLSYS" object_name="FND_FLEX_VAL_RULE_LINES_N1" object_type="INDEX" search_columns="4" cost="1" cardinality="41" cpu_cost="16,371" io_cost="1" access_predicates=""L"."APPLICATION_ID"=101 AND "L"."ID_FLEX_CODE"='GL#' AND "L"."ID_FLEX_NUM"=TO_NUMBER(:P_CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID) AND "L"."FLEX_VALIDATION_RULE_NAME"="B"."FLEX_VALIDATION_RULE_NAME"" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
<PlanElement object_ID="8" id="20" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="FULL" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="1" cost="1,177" cardinality="1,088" bytes="64,192" cpu_cost="249,419,570" io_cost="1,147" filter_predicates=""CC"."ENABLED_FLAG"='Y' AND "CC"."CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID"=TO_NUMBER(:P_CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID) AND NVL("CC"."END_DATE_ACTIVE",SYSDATE@!+1)>SYSDATE@!" time="15" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
- <PlanElement object_ID="9" id="21" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_BALANCES" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="6" cost="55" cardinality="52" bytes="1,300" cpu_cost="439,699" io_cost="55" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
<PlanElement object_ID="10" id="22" operation="INDEX" option="RANGE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_BALANCES_N1" object_type="INDEX" search_columns="1" cost="2" cardinality="52" cpu_cost="25,693" io_cost="2" access_predicates=""GB"."CODE_COMBINATION_ID"="CC"."CODE_COMBINATION_ID"" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
- <PlanElement object_ID="11" id="23" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_LINES" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="5" cost="19" cardinality="40" bytes="3,080" cpu_cost="170,710" io_cost="19" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
<PlanElement object_ID="12" id="24" operation="INDEX" option="RANGE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_LINES_N1" object_type="INDEX" search_columns="1" cost="2" cardinality="49" cpu_cost="24,693" io_cost="2" access_predicates=""GJL"."CODE_COMBINATION_ID"="GB"."CODE_COMBINATION_ID"" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
- <PlanElement object_ID="13" id="25" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_HEADERS" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="4" cost="1" cardinality="1" bytes="52" cpu_cost="10,809" io_cost="1" filter_predicates=""GJH"."STATUS"='P' AND "GJH"."LEDGER_ID"=TO_NUMBER(:P_LEDGER_ID) AND "GJH"."PERIOD_NAME"="GB"."PERIOD_NAME"" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="14" id="26" operation="INDEX" option="UNIQUE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_HEADERS_U1" object_type="INDEX (UNIQUE)" search_columns="1" cost="0" cardinality="1" cpu_cost="1,950" io_cost="0" access_predicates=""GJH"."JE_HEADER_ID"="GJL"."JE_HEADER_ID"" filter_predicates=""GJL"."DESCRIPTION"= (SELECT "DESCRIPTION" FROM "GL"."GL_JE_LINES" "GL_JE_LINES" WHERE ROWNUM=1 AND "PERIOD_NAME"=:B1 AND "CODE_COMBINATION_ID"=:B2 AND "JE_HEADER_ID"=:B3)" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="27" operation="COUNT" option="STOPKEY" filter_predicates="ROWNUM=1">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="11" id="28" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_LINES" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="15" cost="5" cardinality="1" bytes="62" cpu_cost="39,168" io_cost="5" filter_predicates=""JE_HEADER_ID"=:B1" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
<PlanElement object_ID="12" id="29" operation="INDEX" option="RANGE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_LINES_N1" object_type="INDEX" search_columns="2" cost="3" cardinality="4" cpu_cost="22,364" io_cost="3" access_predicates=""CODE_COMBINATION_ID"=:B1 AND "PERIOD_NAME"=:B2" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
- <PlanElement object_ID="15" id="30" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_SOURCES_TL" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="16" cost="1" cardinality="2" bytes="62" cpu_cost="9,291" io_cost="1" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
<PlanElement object_ID="16" id="31" operation="INDEX" option="UNIQUE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1" object_type="INDEX (UNIQUE)" search_columns="2" cost="0" cardinality="1" cpu_cost="1,900" io_cost="0" access_predicates=""JE_SOURCE_NAME"="GJH"."JE_SOURCE" AND "LANGUAGE"=USERENV('LANG')" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
- <PlanElement object_ID="17" id="32" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="17" cost="1" cardinality="2" bytes="62" cpu_cost="9,231" io_cost="1" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
<PlanElement object_ID="18" id="33" operation="INDEX" option="UNIQUE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1" object_type="INDEX (UNIQUE)" search_columns="2" cost="0" cardinality="1" cpu_cost="1,900" io_cost="0" access_predicates=""JE_CATEGORY_NAME"="GJH"."JE_CATEGORY" AND "LANGUAGE"=USERENV('LANG')" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
- <PlanElement object_ID="19" id="34" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="APPLSYS" object_name="FND_USER" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="7" cost="1" cardinality="1" bytes="13" cpu_cost="9,191" io_cost="1" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
<PlanElement object_ID="20" id="35" operation="INDEX" option="UNIQUE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="APPLSYS" object_name="FND_USER_U1" object_type="INDEX (UNIQUE)" search_columns="1" cost="0" cardinality="1" cpu_cost="1,900" io_cost="0" access_predicates=""GJH"."LAST_UPDATED_BY"="FU"."USER_ID"" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="36" operation="SORT" option="AGGREGATE" cardinality="1" bytes="33">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="37" operation="COUNT" option="STOPKEY" filter_predicates="ROWNUM=1">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="38" operation="NESTED LOOPS" cost="69" cardinality="49" bytes="1,617" cpu_cost="624,699" io_cost="69" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="11" id="39" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_LINES" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="12" cost="20" cardinality="49" bytes="882" cpu_cost="164,029" io_cost="20" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
<PlanElement object_ID="12" id="40" operation="INDEX" option="RANGE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_LINES_N1" object_type="INDEX" search_columns="1" cost="3" cardinality="49" cpu_cost="30,964" io_cost="3" access_predicates=""B"."CODE_COMBINATION_ID"=:B1" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
- <PlanElement object_ID="13" id="41" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_HEADERS" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="11" cost="1" cardinality="1" bytes="15" cpu_cost="9,401" io_cost="1" filter_predicates=""A"."STATUS"='P'" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
<PlanElement object_ID="14" id="42" operation="INDEX" option="UNIQUE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_HEADERS_U1" object_type="INDEX (UNIQUE)" search_columns="1" cost="0" cardinality="1" cpu_cost="1,900" io_cost="0" access_predicates=""A"."JE_HEADER_ID"="B"."JE_HEADER_ID"" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="43" operation="COUNT" option="STOPKEY" filter_predicates="ROWNUM=1">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="11" id="44" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_LINES" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="13" cost="5" cardinality="1" bytes="33" cpu_cost="39,068" io_cost="5" filter_predicates=""JE_HEADER_ID"=:B1 AND "LAST_UPDATE_DATE"=:B2" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
<PlanElement object_ID="12" id="45" operation="INDEX" option="RANGE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_JE_LINES_N1" object_type="INDEX" search_columns="2" cost="3" cardinality="4" cpu_cost="22,364" io_cost="3" access_predicates=""CODE_COMBINATION_ID"=:B1 AND "PERIOD_NAME"=:B2" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
- <PlanElement object_ID="0" id="46" operation="SORT" option="AGGREGATE" cardinality="1" bytes="25">
- <PlanElements>
- <PlanElement object_ID="9" id="47" operation="TABLE ACCESS" option="BY INDEX ROWID" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_BALANCES" object_type="TABLE" object_instance="14" cost="6" cardinality="1" bytes="25" cpu_cost="45,399" io_cost="6" time="1">
- <PlanElements>
<PlanElement object_ID="10" id="48" operation="INDEX" option="RANGE SCAN" optimizer="ANALYZED" object_owner="GL" object_name="GL_BALANCES_N1" object_type="INDEX" search_columns="2" cost="3" cardinality="2" cpu_cost="21,964" io_cost="3" access_predicates=""CODE_COMBINATION_ID"=:B1 AND "PERIOD_NAME"=:B2" time="1" />
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</PlanElements>
</PlanElement>
</ExplainPlan>Sorry this xml generated...
Regards
asp

Plz help in building this query .

dear gurus i have problem i have two tables namely purchases
product_id,invoice_no,invoice_date,purchase_rate,quantity
and
sales
product_id,invoice_no,invoice_date,sales_rate,quantity
i have to select sales.product_id,sales.quantity*sales.sales_rate and average of (purchase_rate*purchae.quantity) i.e average purchase price of particular product i.e. group by product_id and purchase price in between particular dates but i m unable to find any good soloution. any help plz
null

I'm not sure I understand your grouping goal, but...
select sales.product_id,
sales.quantity*sales.sales_rate sttl
pur.avgp
from sales
(select avg ( purchase_rate *
quantity) avgp,
product_id
from purchases
group by product_id) pur
where sales.product_id = pur.product_id
and sales.invoice_date between
'04-jun-1999' and '05-may-2001';
If you need more complex grouping, you can add it.

Plz help me rectify this query

Hi,
I am trying to use a OR condition in NOT IN clause, is the SQL statement correct way:
select name from master_list where ((id not in (select id from deleted_list)) OR (id not in (select id from inactive_list)))
I there are two tables which contain ids which should be in not in clause.
Thanks,
Raja

Hi,
Whenever you post fomatted text on this site (and code should always be formatted), type these 6 characters:
{code}
(small letters only, inside curly brackets) before and after sections of formatted text, to preserve spacing.
What is the problem?
Are you getting an error message?
Why not post the error message?
Are you getting the wrong results?
Post some sample data, and the results you want to get from that data.
NOT IN will never be TRUE if the sub-query includes any NULL rows. I can't tell if that's possible with your tables or not..

Plz help me debug this query

query
create table third_party
(customer_id varchar2,
third_party varchar2,
foreign key (third_party) references account(type),
foreign key (customer_id) references customer(customer_id),
primary key(customer_id,third_party));
Error
ORA-00906: missing left parenthesis

Please see this ..these are done
create table account
(account_no number primary key,
type varchar2(10),
balance number(20) );
create table registered_account
( account_no number primary key,
customer_id varchar2(10),
foreign key (account_no) references account(account_no),
foreign key (customer_id) references registered_users(customer_id) );
create table registered_users
(customer_id varchar2(20) primary key,
user_id varchar2(10),
login_password varchar2(10),
foreign key (customer_id) references customer(customer_id));
create table transaction
(transaction_id number primary key,
to_account number,
from_account number,
tr_date date,
amount number,
customer_id varchar2(10),
foreign key (to_account) references account(account_no),
foreign key (from_account) references account(account_no),
foreign key (customer_id) references customer(customer_id));
create table has
(customer_id,
account_no,
foreign key (customer_id) references customer(customer_id),
foreign key (account_no) references account(account_no),
primary key(customer_id,account_no));
create table customer
(customer_id varchar2(20)primary key,
name varchar2(15),
address varchar2(50),
city varchar2(20),pin number(6),
dob varchar2(10),ph_no number(10));
The following is nt working
create table third_party
(customer_id varchar2(20),
third_party varchar2(10),
foreign key (third_party) references account(type),
foreign key (customer_id) references customer(customer_id),
primary key(customer_id,third_party));

Need Help in tuning this query

select CO_PROFILE.CO_NO AS "UEN No.",
CO_PROFILE.CO_NAME AS "Entity Name",
DECODE(CO_PROFILE.CO_TYPE,'A1','PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED BY SHARES',
'A3','COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE',
'A4','UNLIMITED PUBLIC COMPANY',
'B1','LIMITED PRIVATE COMPANY',
'B2','LIMITED EXEMPT PRIVATE COMPANY',
'B3','UNLIMITED PRIVATE COMPANY',
'B4','UNLIMITED EXEMPT PRIVATE COMPANY',
'F1','FOREIGN COMPANY REGISTERED IN SINGAPORE') AS "Entity Type",
M_STATUS.STATUS_DESC AS "Entity Status",
PAYMENT_DETAIL.SERVICE_CODE AS "Service Code",
PAYMENT_DETAIL.PAYMENT_CODE AS "Payment Code",
CO_TRANS_MAST.CO_TRANS_ID AS "Transaction Type",
M_PAYMENT_CODE.PAYMENT_DESC AS "Payment Description",
M_PAYMENT_CODE.REVENUE_CODE AS "Revenue Account",
CO_TRANS_MAST.NUM AS "Number Of Transactions",
PAY_NEW.UNIT_AMT AS "Revenue Amount1",
PAY_NEW.FILING_AMT AS "Revenue Amount2",
PAYMENT_DETAIL.UNIT_FEE AS "Unit Cost"
from CO_PROFILE,
M_STATUS,
PAYMENT_DETAIL,
CO_TRANS_MASTER,
(Select COUNT(CO_NO) AS "NUM",CO_TRANS_ID,CO_NO
from CO_TRANS_MASTER
group by CO_NO,CO_TRANS_ID
)CO_TRANS_MAST,
(Select Sum(UNIT_FEE) AS UNIT_AMT,
SUM(FILING_FEE) AS FILING_AMT,
TRANS_NO AS TRANS_NO
from
PAYMENT_DETAIL
group by
TRANS_NO)
PAY_NEW,
M_PAYMENT_CODE
where rownum=1
and CO_PROFILE.CO_STATUS=M_STATUS.STATUS_CODE
and M_STATUS.TRANS_ID='COMP'
and CO_TRANS_MASTER.CO_TRANS_ID=CO_TRANS_MAST.CO_TRANS_ID
and CO_TRANS_MASTER.CO_NO=CO_TRANS_MAST.CO_NO
and PAYMENT_DETAIL.TRANS_NO=CO_TRANS_MASTER.CO_TRANS_NO
and PAY_NEW.TRANS_NO=PAYMENT_DETAIL.TRANS_NO
and CO_TRANS_MAST.CO_NO= CO_PROFILE.CO_NO
and M_PAYMENT_CODE.PAYMENT_CODE=PAYMENT_DETAIL.PAYMENT_CODE

Something seems wrong to me with the logical structure of the select.
1) You only get 1 row of output
but you
2) build sums for each trans_no
3) You join the table co_trans_master but at the same time you count over that one. Might be ok to do so, but it seems to be double the work.
Suggestion.
a) Build a select that joins the payment detail table. Then group this select and build the sums.
b) Add the count for the number of transactions to the select clause instead of and extra inline view in the from clause. Maybe as an analytical function if possible.

Accent insensitive Search - plz help me correcting this query

Hello,
I just realized that with that query, if I search for "Montreal" (without the accent), I have all the following results, which is what I want
SELECT
"ID","TIT"
from   "REGDOSSIERS" "RDO"
       where
         TRANSLATE(UPPER("TIT"),'ÀÂÉÈÊÎÔÛÙÜ','AAEEEIOUUU')
         like upper(nvl(replace('%' || "P1_REPORT_SEARCH || '%',' ','%'),"TIT"))
RESULTS
TIT
Annuaires Lovell (Montréal et banlieue)
Juridiction royale de Montréal. Dossiers, 1677-1769
Montreal Witness, 1845-1938
{code}
But how to change it so when I look for: "Montréal" (with the accent) , I have also the same results? Right now, with Montréal, I have nothing
thanks,
Roseline
Edited by: Roseline on 2009-10-01 18:58
Edited by: Roseline on Oct 1, 2009 7:34 PM

If you are on Oracle 10g you can use regexp expressions to do the search.
Example
with testdata as (select 'Montreal' txt from dual
                  union all select 'Montréal' txt from dual
                  union all select 'Montreâl' txt from dual
                  union all select 'Montreaux' txt from dual)
/* end of test data creation */
select txt from testdata
where regexp_like (txt, 'Montr[[=e=]]al');
txt
Montreal
Montréal[[=e=]] would be an equivalence class for the letter "e" and includes also searches for é, è, ê etc.
The best solution mainly depends how your search string is build.
If you just want to sort, then the nlssort function would be useful.
Mentioning Nlssort I remembered there is a much better way to implement Accent insensitive search. You just need to set your NLS_SORT parameter correctly. Either to BINARY_AI (the AI means accent and case insensitiv) or add _AI to your nls langage.
example
ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP=LINGUISTIC;
alter session set nls_sort = 'FRENCH';
with testdata as (select 'Montreal' txt from dual
                  union all select 'Montréal' txt from dual
                  union all select 'Montreâl' txt from dual
                  union all select 'Montreaux' txt from dual)
/* end of test data creation */
select txt from testdata
where txt = 'MONTREAL';
no rows selects
/* now change the nls sorting */
alter session set nls_sort = 'FRENCH_AI';
with testdata as (select 'Montreal' txt from dual
                  union all select 'Montréal' txt from dual
                  union all select 'Montreâl' txt from dual
                  union all select 'Montreaux' txt from dual)
/* end of test data creation */
select txt from testdata
where txt = 'MONTREAL';
txt
Montreal
Montréal
MontreâlEdited by: Sven W. on Oct 2, 2009 8:34 AM
Edited by: Sven W. on Oct 2, 2009 10:22 AM - corrected misleading regexp example.

Plz help to make this query......

I ve two table 
 
First one is grn_dtl containing following fields 

item_code ent_dt qty doc_no 
11001318 09/09/2003 5 56300501 
11001318 11/09/2004 9 56300502 
11001318 12/05/2005 2 56300503 
11001319 22/06/2004 0 56300504 
11001320 09/06/2005 0 56300505 
11001320 11/08/2004 8 56300506 
11001320 30/05/2005 4 56300507 
11001320 21/06/2003 1 56300508 
11001321 25/09/2004 1 56300509 
11001321 15/07/2004 1 56300510 
11001321 01/08/2004 2 56300511 
11001322 02/06/2004 1 56300512 
11001322 22/06/2004 2 56300513 
11001323 12/09/2004 1 56300514 
11001323 08/05/2004 4 56300515 
11001323 17/08/2004 5 56300516 
11001323 28/06/2004 2 56300517 
 
second one is item_mst containing following fields 
 

item_code description leadtime kanbandate 
11001318 AIR FILTERS 15 22/04/2004 
11001319 AIR FILTER KIT DSK 15 02/12/2004
11001320 AIR FILTER FOR 3.0 15 14/07/2005
11001321 AIR FILTER NA 21323130 15 23/02/2004
11001322 AMPERE METER DC-0-50 15 05/10/2004
11001323 ACTUATER KIT 15 17/05/2004
11001324 ACTUATOR HOSE 15 27/12/2004
11001325 AIR GUN MEDIUM 15 07/08/2004
from the above two tables I want the query which will display item_code its description ,kanbandate from item_mst table and will also display the minimum ent_dt of each corresponding

select m.item_code,m.description,m.kanbandate,min(d.end_dt)
from item_mst m,grn_dtl d
where m.item_code = d.item_code
group by m.item_code,m.description,m.kanbandate

Plz help in tuning this query......

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for