PNGs + Video Thumbnails = HUGE render times

Dear Users,
I've always used Tiffs before as my export option from Photoshop, but just learned recently that I should be using PNGs. However, now when I use those PNGs in a timeline with custom sized video thumbnails, the render times are LONG. I'm used to rendering cause I'm on a 1st generation 17" MBP, but I'm talking an hour to render a 24-second sequence. The timeline consists of 5 PNG layers and 5 240x180 (Multimedia Small 4:3) 29.97 videos using DV/DVCPRO - NTSC as the Compressor and quality set to 50%. When I drop one of the video files into a new timeline, FCP6 asks me if I want to conform the timeline to meet the clip settings, and I choose yes, but as soon as I put any of the PNGs over the video, I get the orange Unlimited render bar. Any ideas as far as what's causing the Long times beside me being on a laptop? I figure it's gotta be something I'm doing wrong, just like I wasn't using PNGs before. This is for a DVD's Scene selection menu, hence the small videos acting as previews of each scene.
Thank you all,
-Brian

Found the problem. The key was where I said "from Motion." The movie came in with Animation as the compressor type, so when I dropped it onto a new timeline, FCP asked me if I wanted to conform the sequence to match the clip, and when I chose OK, it changed the video rendering from YUV to RGB and the compressor from DV/DVCPRO to Animation. Now for the science of what I found and who I tested it all: PSD = 18 layers, 2.4MB TIF = "layered" Tif, 2.5MB PNG = 540KB
In a brand new timeline, the video and .psd were Unlimited and need rendering to play back smoothly. The tif and png were both fine to play back.
With the conformed timeline settings, the video then played fine, but the psd, tif, and png were all red "Needs Render."
Now as for the rendering itself, the video was a 7 second, 14 frame Animation clip. Still images were placed 3 seconds from the end of the video then rendered. PSD = 18 seconds, TIF = 5 seconds, PNG = 5 seconds to render.
• Both the TIF and PNG could be freely moved around, including over the whole video without requiring another render. The .psd would loose it's render when layered over the video.
In a second brand new NTSC timeline, video captured from DVCAM tape was fine, along with the tif and png again. The psd yet again had the orange render bar even when layered over nothing.
So there's my unscientific tests. I've hated working with the PSDs natively, and those numbers show why. I'll continue to use PNGs because they're both small file sized, nice quality, and fast rendering.
As for my original problem, it was the Animation compression that was causing the problems.
What do you all do for your Photoshop workflows?
-Brian

Similar Messages

  • Video Thumbnails reloads every time I move playhead...

    Impossible to work with video thumbnails in sequence, cause I have to wait for all thumbnails to reload every time I move the playhead or swap windows. Anybody had a simular problem, and a solution?

    Hi Rolf,
    Rolf-Ørjan Høgset wrote:
    Impossible to work with video thumbnails in sequence, cause I have to wait for all thumbnails to reload every time I move the playhead or swap windows. Anybody had a simular problem, and a solution?
    Yes, I have heard of that with certain Mac OS X 10.9 and OS X 10.10 installations. Is that what you have? No current solution but please file a bug report and I'll look into it more deeply when I get back to the office on Monday.
    I've advised others to turn off thumbnails if it is really slowing down your workflow.
    Thanks,
    Kevin

  • Question about video cards and render times

    I would like to know if having a REAL video card (not a GeForce with a measly 64 megs of RAM), would help with the rendering times in iDVD? I prefer to use the High Quality settings, so rendering is taking a very long time. Would a card with more video RAM help this along any faster? Thanks in advance.

    I would be surprised, if the grafic card (=display) is involved in the process of encoding a videoDVD... (???) this a computational task =>CPU, main system...
    factors for encoding speed are:
    * CPU (G3/4/5/dual/quad/Intel)
    * RAM (… as much as your wallet allows...)
    * speed of harddrive..
    * other tasks... best practise: let encoding the only main task...
    * lots of free space on internal drive (iDVD needs at last 10 - 15GB free); trying to create a videoDVD with letssay 3GB free adds hours of encoding time
    helpful?

  • Premiere pro huge rending times

    Hi,
    Just wanted to double check i'm not going crazy here.
    I have a Imac 27" late 2013. Processor 3.2GHZ Intel Core i5.
    24GB of RAM
    Nvidie Geforce GT 755M 1024M
    I have enabled  CUDA.
    I'm working on some go pro footage at 2.4K.
    i have added a warp stabiliser and lens correction to each of the 15 clips that make a whole sequence of 1m15s. I've also added transitions to each.
    Average rendering time is 2 hours. For a one minute clip it seems excessive?
    All the clip have red bars, and i can't even begin to use the direct link to speedgrade, its so slow its unsuable.
    Pretty strange considering it should be a decent machine?

    Ingest via prelude (or use AME in batch), choosing the trans-code option, and trans-coding to MXF (since I usually combine that with  MXF media shot from Canon xf305), or to a native format that won't require conforming in PPro.  I also record to to DNxHD on a Samurai Blade, via HDSDI or HDMI from rentals and other sources which uses an MXF wrapper.

  • Premiere-After Effects Dynamic Link render times vary wildly after minimal composition changes

    Here is something strange that happens a lot to me.
    I'll have a sequence in Premiere Pro CC 2014 that is entirely or largely an AE comp that I have dynamically linked.  I'll use a specific case as an example, but it's happened with various projects.
    In this most recent one the visual (but not audio) of my Premiere sequence is one AE dynamically linked comp of about 90 seconds.  It's more or less a fancy slide show- some photos with moves, some text, motion blur, masking, maybe a few filters.  Fairly basic stuff as far as After Effects goes.
    Anyhow, I like to render the sequence in Premiere and then watch it down with music to see if the timing works and make adjustments from there.  That's my usual workflow.  The strange thing is that when I render, the render times can vary tremendously.  With this particular project, one time rendered in about 2 minutes in Premiere.  I watched it down and I noticed a spelling error, which I fixed.  Just changing one word of text in AE.  This, of course, causes the entire linked comp to need to be rendered again in Premiere.  This time when I go to render, it took about 20 minutes and it only got about  70% of the way through.  A huge difference and all I changed was a couple letters, which shouldn't impact how intensive of a render is needed.  What I usually do is cancel the render when it takes that long, then quit Premiere, reopen, and render right away after I open.  When I do this, after the application restart, the sequence will then render in the faster approximately 2 minute duration.  Almost invariably this is true.
    So I end up quitting and restarting Premiere a lot to get the faster render times.  But of course that's annoying.
    What is going on here?
    I know that some might have critiques of the workflow and watching in Premiere and the fact that one letter change forces the entire sequence re-render.  I know I could break it up and there are ways around that.  But I am not interested in such critiques.  My work flow actually is quite efficient when the 2 minute render time happens.  Just not when it takes 10x more than that for the same thing.  Why are there these huge render time swings?
    My guess is that some cache gets filled up, so when the application is just started, and the cache is empty, the render works much better.  But I really do not know.
    Help please.

    There is currently a bug that causes Dynamic Link performance to be poor when the main After Effects application is running. (The underlying issue is that the main After Effects application is sending many more messages during Dynamic Link than it needs to.)
    The easy workaround is to quit the main After Effects application when using Premiere Pro to process a dynamically linked After Effects composition.
    This bug is fixed in an update due to be released in less than two weeks.

  • In iMovie, why do I get the msg "high resolution video thumbnails and then it immediately starts with "now" and it's hung up for a long time

    In iMovie, why do I get the msg "high resolution video thumbnails" and it automatically goes to Now and the laptop is hung up for a very long time and I have to shut down to get out of it?

    Hi,
    Welcome to the    Discussions
    So we have DSL Modem <-> Base Station <-> Computer connected by Ethernet.
    Is the Modem Routing ?
    Is the Base Station set to "Share An IP" ?
    (i.e are there two DHCP servers on your LAN ?)
    Is Internet Sharing On in th G5s System Preferences > Sharing pane ?
    In the Base Station is Port Mapping Protocol Enabled if it is doing routing ?
    It is in the NAT tab of the Internet Pane.
    Is the G5 also doing WiFi to the Base Station ?
    Also check the Modem is not Blocking PINGS as this log shows no PING (But I am not sure it even got that far)
    7:45 PM Thursday; February 18, 2010
    Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"

  • Is 12hrs a normal estimated render time for a 10min video?

    I'm trying to make visuals for my music, which consists of 4 pictures, 4 adjustment layers (each with 1 evolution keyframe from start to finish on each), & 2 audio spectrums. Being brand new to AE, iss 12 hrs a normal render time upon exporting?
    I'm running on an i7-4820k, Windows 7/64bit, 32GB of RAM, & a Geforce GTX 760.
    Any answers/questions for me would be great!!

    Ah, your lack of experience won't help, I'm afraid. You cannot intuitively decide how to optimize rendering without lots of experience. AE just doesn't work like Photoshop or FCP or Illustrator. You could, hover, transcode your mp3 to aan uncompressed codec and save some processing. You could copy your Audio and Audio Spectrum layers and put them in their own comp and render that out as prores422. Bring the rendered movie back in and replace all those layers with the movie. Adjustment layers are sexy but misleading. You probably are using them incorrectly, most beginners do. Fractal noise can be a rendering slug. Render that as a movie if you can.
    Prerendering is basically just looking at your comp and deciding what effects/layers are not dependent on others. Precomposing is a process of grouping layers together to form a desired output that can be fed back into the main comp for a specific effect or filter. The classic example is drop shadow on a rotating object. If you just apply the drop shadow to the rotation object, the shadow is applied before the object is moved and the shadow moves with the object as it rotates, destroying the illusion. If you precompose the rotating object and apply the shadow to the precomp, the movement is rendered before the shadow is applied. It's complicated but you get the hang of it after a few epic rants.
    Try to have fun. AE is unbelievably cool.

  • Render time taking 1 hour for 4 seconds

    I am trying to render a 4 second clip of 3d text doing a 360° turn, I export in H.264 and have okay computer specs.
    3.04 GHz Quad core
    12 gigs of ram
    I'm new to this and want to start exporting more video for a project, but I can't do it with this render time.
    Brandon

    LilTunchiB8 wrote:
    What would be a conventional, frame-based codec? Thank you so much for the help!
    Uncompressed AVI is one, but the file sizes are going to surprise you. Quicktime with the PNG codec is usually smaller, but still huge. Quicktime with the PhotoJPEG codec is even smaller. Some popular choices that are even smaller are DNxHD and Cineform (either MOV or AVI). They're still going to be much larger than the H.264, but that's okay!
    For many (most) professionals, the usual workflow is to render a lossless file (or nearly lossless) out of AE and then use the Adobe Media Encoder or Premiere to create the final deliverable. There are several reasons, but one is that AE is not very good at rendering h.264 files (and there are some very technical reasons for this). Anyway, the AE team deprecated the h.264 rendering in the latest version of After Effects because of it.
    In your case, I would suggest rendering into a TIFF sequence (or something similar). This way, if there is a crash or something, you can pick your render up at the last frame it rendered rather than having to start at the beginning. I always do this when I'm doing 3d work and the render is going to be over an hour. Then you can bring that TIFF sequence into Premiere as if it's a video file, put your audio and everything to it, and send your final H.264 render from Premiere.

  • Exporting HD in FCX - massive render times issues

    Hello,
    Reading the FCP X Help topics etc I think I have a good understanding of import/export criteria. However, I have it from some peers that I could do much better with regard to reducing the massive render times I am experiencing.
    Currently the render time for an 8minute clip is 26 hours using Compressor 4 using preset 'HD 1080 Video Sharing (H2.64) - AAC
    BACKGROUND:
    OS X 10.8.3 (12D78)
    17-inch, Late 2008 MacBookPro
    2.5 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    4 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM
    FCX 10.0.8
    Raw footage is 1920 - 1080 from Canon D7 card -  copied to an external HD.
    Import settings: both proxy and optimised - both with huge export times as above.
    Destination to Movei folder or desktop
    The 8 minute sequence includes filters which I know will increase processing time, but by this much is pretty horrendous. (a 'preset' colour correction + sharpen + manual colour correction)
    My understanding is that if I import - or later convert all footage - into optimised files - these become ProRes222 files which will give me much faster render and export times. But this does not seem to be happening.
    It simply is not efficient or practical to myself or any clients to have 25 - 30 hour export times for 8 minute sequences
    My impression is that this computer is simply not up to  faster rendering/export processing - but my peers tell me my currrent render/export times are rediculously long.
    Can any one advise please.
    Thank you.

    This is the Final Cut Studio forum.
    You need to ask your questions here: Final Cut Pro X

  • Render times: what is expected?

    Hello,
    I recently went to render a project, and it estimated that it would take 44 hours to complete. That is, shall we say, less than ideal.
    Some specs about my machine:
    MacBook Pro
    2.6 GHz Intel Core i7
    16 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 RAM
    The Disk Cache:
    LaCie USB3 External SSD (200 GB allocated for cache)
    Details about my AE project:
    AE version: CS6
    3:15 (3 minutes 15 seconds) duration
    1920 x 1080 (1080p) resolution
    Ray-traced 3D environment
    17 light layers
    3 cameras
    All other layers are either shapes, solids, pictures, or pre-comps
    I'm trying to render out to h.264 format. It seems to me that 40+ hours is extremely excessive for a 3:15 long video, but I'm not positive that's the case. I'd love to hear thoughts back on expectations and how I can reduce this time (either through settings or better hardware).
    Thank you!

    rhannebaum wrote:I chose H.264 because it seemed the most common HD video output, and I didn't want to use QuickTime (.mov) because the resultant .mov files were huge. Very hard to transfer around after the fact.
    Oh, I was pretty sure that was your reasoning.
    Yes, the resulting file will be huge (unless you're rendering to an image sequence in which case the mass of resulting files will be huge ) . You then take that file (or image sequence) into Premiere or the Adobe Media Encoder to create your easy-to-transfer file - in your case, h.264 is probably your best bet. But, for the reasons I enumerated, you do not want to do the h.264 right out of AE.
    There are other options to a lossless Quicktime or an image sequence (although the crashing rescue alone is worth the image sequence option). Where I work we use the Cineform codec from GoPro. It's free and it's close enough to lossless for our workflow, but the file size is significatly smaller. Another great choice is the DNxHD codec which is free from Avid. It has the same benefits as the Cineform codec.
    rhannebaum wrote:
    Are image sequences simple to import into Premiere? Also, is Media Encoder faster at rendering than AE? I know the obvious benefit is that I can keep working in AE while a comp renders in Media Encoder, but not sure beyond that what ME's value is.
    Image sequences are as easy to import into Premiere as any other video format. It's great!
    Media Encoder is not faster than AE - and, in some cases (as others have mentioned), it can be much slower. However, it does a much better job of encoding H.264. The quality is higher for the same data rate. That (among other reasons) is why, in the new version of AE CC, the H.264 render option has been deprecated.
    For your workflow, I would not suggest sending your AE comp to the AME; render a lossless (or nearly lossless) file out of AE and then use the Adobe Media Encoder to create your final deliverable.
    One cool thing about the Adobe Media Encoder is that you can set up watch folders so that any time an uncompressed file lands in that folder, it gets encoded per your specified settings.
    rhannebaum wrote:
    Is Cinema4D a plugin native to AE CC? I'm afraid my upgrade options are limited to what my company approves, but if there is a legit improvement in render times in CC over CS6, that may seriously persuade them...
    Cinema4D is the industry standard 3d animation software for creating motion graphics. It's also got some good scuplting, modeling, and character animation tools and is fast becoming one of the big players in all aspects of 3d animation. One of the reasons for its rapid growth (besides the fact that its easier to learn than its competition) is that it integrates very well with After Effects.
    Bundled with (and integrated with) AE CC, you get a lite version of C4D. It doesn't have nearly the power of the full program, but it's worlds better than messing with the 3d ray-traced stuff and gives you a lot more tools to work with.
    Bottom line: if your company is going to want you to do more 3d stuff, you really need to get into a plugin like Element, 3d Invigorator, or ShapeShifter. They render much faster.
    And, if they really want you to do some great 3d, they'll need to get a full-fledged 3d program for you (and the requisite training). Upgrading to the CC version of AE is a great halfway step though.

  • Render times large comps (4000x1000)

    Hi Everyone,
    So I'm working on a project that is a scene for live performance. The work space is 4000x1000 split between 5 screens of different dimensions. Basically I'm designing a panorama for a live set. I need to split the pano into 5 outputs for the various playback machines.
    My concept was to create a 4000x1000 comp and then nest that in smaller precomps for the final outputs.
    The problem I'm hitting is that even though the precomps are small it seems like the entire pano is being rendered anyway. Ive tried a region of interest in the render setting with similar render times.
    I cant design the pano as separate comps because they all interact with each other and it would just become a continuity nightmare.
    Any ideas how I can get the render times down?
    Thanks for your time.
    Cheers
    Glenn

    Refine your workflow. First of all, each panel must be a standard output size if you are sending the images to a series of projectors. You must figure out how the show is going to be put on, then follow the requirements for multi stream projection from the supplier of the gear. If you don't check first your entire project may have to be redone.
    Secondly, I'd learn about proxies, buy all the ram that will fit in your system, and think about your workflow very hard. You could set up 5 cameras on your huge comp, you could set up guide lines and then duplicate your master comp and use the guides to break up the copies into smaller comps using the crop composition to region of interest feature.
    Another option is to set up a single comp at a more reasonable size to produce a version of your comp that contains all of the elements but at an HD frame size. Then you could use the scale comp script file to create a full size comp that could be divided up into final output frame sizes using the crop to region of interest option on duplicates.
    If it were me I'd set up an HD comp, cut it up into 5 equal pieces, then set up the animations. If the footage (images) used in the final are huge, use proxies, if there's artwork, make it vector art, if there's video, use it at full resolution.
    None of this advice will mean anything if you don't have the output specs from the folks providing the projectors in the first place. I'm a little concerned by the line "5 screens of different dimensions." Every multi screen system I've worked with has the same output options, NTSC Normal, NTSC Widescreen, or HD.

  • Slow render times with large jpegs - complete system lag

    In a project i'm working on I have two large jpegs with a small zoom scaling effect. Going from 100 to 103 percent.
    I've noticed that both Adobe Media Encoder and Premiere Pro experience a heavy slow down in render time as soon as the jpegs have to be rendered.
    Not only does the render speed almost come to a halt, the complete system lags very heavy, even the mouse cursor won't respond well.
    This happens when i have GPU acceleration enabled and when i do a 2 pass H264 encoding.
    When I have the GPU acceleration disabled the render goes very smooth, and doesn't seem to slow down...
    The jpeg is 4023  x 2677, and 6,97 MB large.
    Scaling the jpeg down to about 1920x1080 in Photoshop and put that one in the timeline made the render go a lot faster.
    I understand that a large picture takes a bit more time to be rendered, but we're talking about a 10minute render whit the large jpeg file and  a 2 minute render with the jpeg resized.
    The total time of the two jpegs in the video is 5 seconds in a 3 minutes video.
    So, that made me think that the render times are exponentially long.
    In the timeline everything runs really smooth.
    Is this considered normal, I can't remember having such big differences in CS5. It's not a major thing, but I wanted to share anyway.
    My system:
    Premiere Pro CC (latest)
    i7 4930K
    32 GB RAM
    2xGTX480
    Footage and project on a Raid0 disk
    Previews/Cache on a Raid0 disk
    System and Premiere on SSD
    Render to a single 7200 rpm drive.

    >wanted to share
    Yes... known issue... I think some of the below is about P-Elements, but the same ideas
    Photo Scaling for Video http://forums.adobe.com/thread/450798
    -HiRes Pictures to DVD http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1187937?tstart=0
    -PPro Crash http://forums.adobe.com/thread/879967

  • How can I delete the iPhoto Video Thumbnails in iMovie?

    It's been a while since I've used iMovie, and when I opened the application tonight, I got the following message:
    "iMovie needs to generate thumbnails for the videos in your iPhoto library. This process may take several minutes.
    You can postpone this operation by clicking Later, but your iPhoto videos will be unavailable until the next time you restart iMovie."
    I accidentally hit NOW, and the process began. When I realized it had used about 5 GBs of space, I force quit iMovie, but the disk space was not reclaimed. I need this space back now... I can import the iPhoto videos later. How can I undo the generated iPhoto video thumbnails? There was no project generated, and so no folder with the thumbnails in them. Where are they located? I would like to delete the iPhoto video thumbnails within iMovie, but preserve the thumbnails for other projects. And of course I would like to be sure that I keep the videos themselves in iPhoto - I definitely do not want to lose the videos there. Thanks for your help.
    Greg

    The latest incarnation of iMovie doesn't offer the 'Export with Quicktime'-options, the previous versions did.

  • Cannot select multiple video clips at a time

    With the previous version, I could simply select all and import all my videos and pictures at once, in the order I copied them to my hard drive. Now, I have to "select entire clip" then, press letter E on every video clip, then, go back and add pictures. This is a huge downgrade from the previous version of IMovie.

    hello ,thanks for jour mail ,but my English is very very bad sorry but
    many thank for your feedback. Hav a nice Day
    Am 09.12.2014 16:57, schrieb carpmusic:
    >
          Replace audio in multiple video clips at one time
    created by carpmusic <https://forums.adobe.com/people/carpmusic> in
    /Premiere Pro/ - View the full discussion
    <https://forums.adobe.com/message/6998981#6998981>

  • Looong render times with motion templates

    I've been a big advocate for FCPX as there are a lot of great features but there are some things that are just killing me, no.1 render time.
    I'm working on some simple presentation edits using motion templates I have built in motion 5 and published to fcpx. The templates all consist of a single dropbox for video with a type field for test messages next to it. These are against a flat white rectangle used to reflect (similar to the coverflow but against a white background) and a subtle camera sweep has been added so it slowly turns from one side to the other by 30 degrees. Each of these is 10 seconds long.
    I chop up my imported movie on the timeline (untouched by grade/fx/retiming) and add the template to each of the chopped clips. I then select each applied template in the timeline and use the video well to select the clip below it for the dropzone. I add my text. That's all good. I now have a timeline approx 3 minutes long consisting of these motion graphics templates.
    Now, if I chose to either render or export a QT with timeline settings, estimated time is 8 - 9 hrs (I have tried both) I left a 3:30 project exporting last night at 11:45. It finished at 9:00AM.
    That is just unacceptable. It is irritating because the functionality of building the sequences in FCPX far outweighs what FCP 7 is capable of but the so-called "renderless" abilities of FCPX
    are making life ****.
    I use Event Manager X to turn off everything I am not using except the individual project. I have reset preferences in Preference Manager to see if that helps. I have purged using terminal. I have my clips on an external firewire 800 HD. I have no other software running. I accept I need a more powerful Mac - I'm using a 2009 3 Ghz Intel Core Duo iMac with 6gig ram using Lion 10.7.2 and FCPX 10.0.2 but 9 hours for a 3:30 clip?
    Any suggestions for where I can cut down on render time are appreciated. The source clip for the video for the dropzones and the final exported presentation movie are HD ProRes.
    Cheers

    The situation you describe does not seem normal. It should not take nearly that long to render and export your 3:30 movie. Considering that your mac is not one of the most recent vintage, and your are editing in full HD, one could expect it to take a bit of time, but nothing like this.
    In the way of troubleshooting, you could try and export just one of these 10 second segments.
    I have no way of knowing for sure, but I guess that it might export in a much more reasonable amount of time.
    I suspect that memory may be running scarce, which, as has been repeatedly mentioned in these fora, is a problem affecting many of us using FCP X under Lion. You mentioned you used "purge" in the Terminal, but in such a long render you might have had to do it repeatedly...

Maybe you are looking for

  • Opening RAW files in Bridge - not recognized as "Camera RAW files"

    I would appreciate any help with this as I am frustrated after spending hours trying to figure this out: I use a Mac OS X laptop I have a Panasonic (DMC FZ8) camera that I've been taking RAW pictures with. I plug my camera into my computer and try an

  • How to access the purchased music on my iPad through iCloud

    Just got an iPad, which works find but I haven t found the way to access the music I purchased through iTunes The iTunes application shows me only the music store And when I go to the setting - iCloud I don t seem to have a music tab to activate Is t

  • Oracle BIEE

    Hi, What's the difference between Oracle Business Intelligence Suite Enterprise Edition Plus and Oracle Business Intelligence Server Enterprise Edition. Thanks.

  • License of content server

    I would like to know if I use content server for DMS purpose, the license has been inculed or need to separate buy. thanks!

  • Itunes won't display any Japanese song titles

    Any ideas.  I recently downloaded the latest itunes (10.4).  Prior to this all my song titles displayed correctly in both Japanese and English.  Now, only some Japanese Artists (in Japanese Characters) will display correctly in the library, but the s