PO Splitting Rules/ Requisition Grouping for AutoCreate

Hello,
I need to know what are the rules that cause requisition to split into multiple PO's when auto generated?
I know two profile values 'PO: Use Need-by Date for Default Autocreate grouping' or 'PO: Use Ship-to Organization and Location for Default Autocreate grouping' that we can setup. Are there any such profile options available? Or can we change the way this functionality works? If yes, how to achieve that?
Our business isenquiring is it possible to suppress grouping based on Buyer? We have case where single requisition had multiple lines. This requisition generated 3 unique PO's based on buyer.
Any impits will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Anish

Hello Sandeep,
Thank you for your response.
Our buyer do not go to autocreate screen. When purchasing requisition is approved, it automatically generates PO.
Our business wants to remove requistion grouping based on BUyer. Eg: Currently if requisition has 3 lines with 3 different category items and each category has different Buyer assigned to it, then autocreate process will generate 3 unique PO's for this one requisition.
Thanks,
Anish

Similar Messages

  • Masters in a custom Theme split into two groups for no reason

    Hi,
    I created a custom theme.
    The problem is that when I select it and click on Masters, I see my Master slides split into two groups.
    This is annoying.
    Any solutions?

    same thing happening to me. in fact.. it seems like every slide i create...causes another instance of masters to be created. even though it's all the same theme.
    Why?

  • PO Splitting Rules/ Requisition line grouping Rules for Autocreate

    Hello,
    I need to know what are the rules that cause requisition to split into multiple PO's when auto generated?
    I know two profile values 'PO: Use Need-by Date for Default Autocreate grouping' or 'PO: Use Ship-to Organization and Location for Default Autocreate grouping' that we can setup. Are there any such profile options available? Or can we change to add or remove the requisition line grouping rules? If yes, how to achieve that?
    Our business is inquiring if it is possible to suppress grouping based on Buyer? We have case where single requisition had multiple lines. This requisition generated 3 unique PO's based on buyer.
    Any impits will be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Anish

    Hello Sandeep,
    Thank you for your response.
    Our buyer do not go to autocreate screen. When purchasing requisition is approved, it automatically generates PO.
    Our business wants to remove requistion grouping based on BUyer. Eg: Currently if requisition has 3 lines with 3 different category items and each category has different Buyer assigned to it, then autocreate process will generate 3 unique PO's for this one requisition.
    Thanks,
    Anish

  • Creation of new document types for document splitting rules

    Hi experts,
    We have copied from existing SA  document type to new document type.
    In standard SAP  SA  document type - define document splitting rule, we have select  "NO INHERITANCE OF ACCOUNT ASSINGNMENT", when posting the  GL document SA  document type without mapping partner profit center,system is control the derive the partner profit center.
      Our requirement is  copied from existing  SA  document type to create a new document type - we have created the new dusiness transaction variant and we have map the "classify document type to document splitting rule " and we have selet the "No inheritance of account assignment" while posting in FB01 GL document with out mapping partner profit center system is not control the " derive partner profit center".
    Could you please assist us as soon as possible
    Thanks ,
    Sreenivas
    Edited by: sapfico.srini12 on Jan 16, 2012 4:37 PM

    Hi,
    In order to create a document type for a purchase requisition  use the path
    spro-materials management - purchasing--purchase requisitions --define  document type
    in that screen you select the document type you want to copy to create your document type and perform the action.
    if you want to change the screen/field selection for your document type select the field selection key (if you select the document type as NBB the field selection key will be NBB.,and go to the screen and change the field status.
    Hope this will be suffient for your requirement.
    Regards,
    Raghu.

  • ASDM multiple network objects vs group for rules

    I was just curious if there are any performance benefits of using multiple network objects on multiple rules vs consolidating them into fewer rules by grouping them? 
    For example, I have about 10 lines of NAT exempt rules from the same source to multiple destinations.  Is there anything to be gained if I consolidated those into a single rule using an object group for the multiple destinations aside from cleaning up the clutter in ASDM?
    Thanks

    Hello Tony,
    Of course, it will be better because the processing that the ASA is going to use to determine witch rule to match would be decremented, also it would take less space on the configuration file (memory). those are some of the pros regarding creating groups for particular rules.
    Sometimes a huge configuration file can increment the CPU usage,etc,etc. so it is better to keep it as small and organized as possible.
    Please rate helpful posts.
    Regards,
    Julio

  • ISE: create rules with AD groups for Users and Computers

    Hello,
    We've just begun to work with ISE.
    Is it the good place to post on ISE, or there is a dedicated forum in another place?
    We'd like to create some rule depending of Computer member groups AND Users member groups from AD, but we meet some difficulties.
    We've created AD groups for Computers and Users depending of their Department:
    Users_1
    Users_2
    Computers_1
    Computers_2
    When we create some basics rules regarding one group only:
    - with a group Computers_x to attribute a specific VLAN to a computer (when no Windows session is opened), it runs correctly.
    - with a group Users_x to attribute a specific VLAN to an user (when Windows session is opened), it runs correctly.
    But when we create a rule regarding a group from Computers and one from Users, to attribute a specific VLAN to an user on a specific computer, this rule is not applied.
    Is it possible to use ISE on this way?
    Thanks for help.
    Regards,
    Chris

    Enable EAP Chaining— if  you want Cisco ISE to allow authentication of both machine and user in the same  EAP-FAST authentication.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns414/ns742/ns744/docs/howto_80_eapchaining_deployment.pdf

  • How to create distribution rules group for wbs settlement rules

    Hi,
    How can I create distribution rules group for WBS element settlement rules ?
    For some WBS elements I can see(in view mode(cj03)) distribution groups in settlement rules screen but when I try to edit settlement rules I only see default group.
    How can i create/edit those groups ?
    Regards,
    Rafał

    Self answered:
    CJIC t-code

  • Split Rule doesn't work for certain items

    Hi experts,
    In TPVS, I set up split rule with split qty 1 and no item split.  The rest of setting is like default value.  However, in VS01, some item qty is more than 1.  I check the detail. There is exception, but don't know what it is.  Is there any way to know the exception detail?
    I know the freight unit can not be automatically executed when fixed line exists or the freight unit is created manually.  I check the freight unit type (icon), it's @39@.  It should not be manually created unit.  There is way to figure out whether it's fixed line.  Is there any one can give me some idea about that?
    When we enter VS01, the system will build freight unit based on split rule.  However, if we do not exit vs01 and re-run VSR optimization many times, the freight unit will be come bigger and bigger but still within vehicle capacity if we choose merge planned item option in split rule.  The result might not be right.  For example, system merge 2 items together for vehicle A and next item might merge these 2 items with another 1 item for vehicle B.  If capacity of vehicle A is 2, system won't never choose vehicle A if the FU is 3 after the previous optimization run.  Is that true?  Does that mean we need to exit vs01 everytime for each optimization run?
    Thanks for your advice,
    Jessie.

    HI Jessie,
    Regarding the first issue, I hope you have properly maintained the unit of measure in splirt profile. I would recommend that you try performing manual split using the same split rule. This might tell you the exact reason.
    I can not comment about 2nd issue.
    Regarding the 3rd issue, the problem you say seems to be right. I have also experienced the same. My only query is that when you run the optimizer, the system will plan the shipments & will assign the freight units to the truck. Now if you have selected 'Fix Temporary Shipments' in optimizer profile, it will not modify the existing planned shipments in new optimizer run & hence will not merge new item with existing merged item.
    I hope my understanding of the issues is correct. You can reply back in case you have more queries.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sandeep Patil

  • MRP split purchase requisition with same date

    Hi guru
    When I run MRP, if there are more requirements for the same material with same date, the system creates one purchase requisition grouping requirements.
    So, if I have two requirements of 3 and 2 pieces for material A, with date 18042015, the system creates one purchase requisition of 5 pieces
    I tried to use a BADI in order to split purchase requistion and have in this case a purchase requisition of 3 pieces and another one of 2 pieces but maybe I wrong something because MRP works wrong.
    Is there anyone that could give some tips about this request? Is there anyone that had same problem?
    Thanks
    Regards
    Raffaele

    Hi,
    Hope your BAdI is working now.
    MD51 is used for project. It creates replenishment orders against a WBS element. After this, you can run MD01 which will create replenishment order by material/plant level.
    If you have a question related to PS, maybe you can post your thread in this space:
    SAP Project Systems (SAP PS)
    Kind Regards,
    Mariano

  • Udev rules and group / permission errors [solved] [outdated]

    Latest udev is a miracle to me. It ignores every group ore permission settings. Anyone else having same experiences?
    Last edited by Moo-Crumpus (2008-09-29 05:17:40)

    Let's assume that you have two files with udev rules. The basic udev.rules and 00.udev.rules (with custom rules).
    Udev first reads all rules from 00 file and then rules from the basic file.
    This means that if you have a custom rule for a given device you should copy all rules that apply to it from the basic file to the 00 file (not only lines with GROUP). This is because with OPTIONS="last_rule" udev will stop processing rules for this device.
    All rules are read and then applied in the order from the top to bottom except SUBSYTEM which is applied as the last rule (kind of held in a buffer). This is the reason why my cd burner /dev/hdc had permissions for disk group and not optical.
    This is my 00.udev.rules (it still needs some cosmetic changes but it works and of course I don't have all the devices):
    SUBSYSTEM="video4linux", GROUP="users"
    SUBSYSTEM="sound", GROUP="users"
    SUBSYSTEM="printer", GROUP="users"
    SUBSYSTEM="block", GROUP="disk"
    BUS="ide", KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/etc/udev/cdsymlinks.sh %k", SYMLINK="%c{1} %c{2} %c{3} %c{4} %c{5} %c{6}"
    BUS="ide", KERNEL="hd*", PROGRAM="/etc/udev/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", SYMLINK="%c{1} %c{2}"
    BUS="ide", KERNEL="hdc", SYSFS{removable}="1", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="cdrom*", NAME="%k", GROUP="users", SYMLINK="nagrywarka dvd cdrw", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    BUS="ide", KERNEL="hd[a-z]", SYSFS{removable}="1", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="cdrom*", NAME="%k", GROUP="users", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    BUS="ide", KERNEL="hd*", PROGRAM="/etc/udev/ide-floppy.sh %k", RESULT="floppy", NAME{all_partitions}="%k", GROUP="users", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    BUS="scsi", KERNEL="sr[0-9]*", PROGRAM="/etc/udev/cdsymlinks.sh %k", SYMLINK="%c{1} %c{2} %c{3} %c{4} %c{5} %c{6}"
    BUS="scsi", KERNEL="scd[0-9]*", PROGRAM="/etc/udev/cdsymlinks.sh %k", SYMLINK="%c{1} %c{2} %c{3} %c{4} %c{5} %c{6}"
    BUS="scsi", KERNEL="sr[0-9]*", SYSFS{type}="5", NAME="scd%n", GROUP="users", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    BUS="scsi", KERNEL="sg[0-9]*", SYSFS{type}="5", NAME="%k", GROUP="users", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="fd[0-9]*", NAME="fd%n", GROUP="users", SYMLINK="floppy/%n fd%nu1440 fd%nu720 fd%nh1200 fd%nu360", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    BUS="usb", SYSFS{serial}="CN16J1Q3HWSX", KERNEL="lp[0-9]*", NAME="usb/%k", GROUP="users", SYMLINK="drukarka_hp_845c drukarka", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    BUS="usb", KERNEL="sd*", PROGRAM="/etc/udev/usb-storage.sh %k", RESULT="1", NAME="%k", GROUP="users", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="rtc", NAME="misc/%k", SYMLINK="%k", GROUP="users", MODE="0664", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="agpgart", NAME="misc/%k", SYMLINK="%k" GROUP="users", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="nvidia*", GROUP="users", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="fb[0-9]*", NAME="fb/%n", GROUP="users", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="card[0-9]*", NAME="dri/%k", GROUP="users", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="3dfx*", NAME="%k", GROUP="users", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="dvb*", PROGRAM="/etc/udev/dvb.sh %k", NAME="%c", GROUP="users", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="video[0-9]*", NAME="v4l/video%n", GROUP="users", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="radio[0-9]*", NAME="v4l/radio%n", GROUP="users", SYMLINK="radio%e", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="vbi[0-9]*", NAME="v4l/vbi%n", GROUP="users", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="vtx[0-9]*", NAME="v4l/vtx%n", GROUP="users", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="controlC[0-9]*", NAME="snd/%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="hw[CD0-9]*", NAME="snd/%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="pcm[CD0-9cp]*", NAME="snd/%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="midi[CD0-9]*", NAME="snd/%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="timer", NAME="snd/%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="seq", NAME="snd/%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="audio*", NAME="sound/%k", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="dmmidi*", NAME="sound/%k", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="admmidi*", NAME="sound/%k", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="dsp*", NAME="sound/%k", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="adsp*", NAME="sound/%k", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="midi*", NAME="sound/%k", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="amidi*", NAME="sound/%k", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="mixer*", NAME="sound/%k", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="sequencer*", NAME="sound/%k", SYMLINK="%k", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="pktcdvd", NAME="pktcdvd/control", GROUP="users", MODE="0660", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL="pktcdvd[0-9]*", NAME="pktcdvd/pktcdvd%n", GROUP="users", MODE="0660", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    The problem with /dev/hdc was that first udev (version 057) was reading a rule from my 00 file (BUS="ide", KERNEL="hdc"...) with GROUP=users. Then it was reading SUBSYSTEM="block", GROUP="disk" rule from the basic file (but it wasn't executed at that time). And then it was reading BUS="ide", KERNEL="hd[a-z]", SYSFS{removable}="1"... with GROUP=optical. Then it was executing SUBSYTEM rule (hdc is a block device). That's why only disk group had an access to /dev/hdc (with OPTIONS="last_rule" in the basic file in the GROUP="optical" line it would ignore SUBSYSTEM rule).
    There are also other rules that you should add (IMO) to your custom rules if  you are changing something. In my case it's for example BUS="ide", KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/etc/udev/cdsymlinks.sh %k"... which creates symlinks for cd drives. This rule must be above other rules (the number of the symlinks is now unlimited - previously it was 5 IIRC).
    So now the rules are mixed together in the lexical order (except SUBSYTEM rules which are executed at the end) unless OPTIONS="last_rule" is used or second (and other) rule has a NAME filed (only one rule for a given device can have NAME filed. Every other rule for the same device with NAME field is ignored IIRC). It also means you can now split rules for a device into several rules - only one of them can have NAME filed and the last should have OPTIONS="last_rule".
    Since in your case you have custom rules only for a well defined usb devices (not /dev/sd*) IMO it should work as you think (only add OPTIONS="last_rule").
    I hope it's now perfectly clear  8) 

  • Invoice split rule

    hi, 
    Can we set up Invoice split rule in SPRO or it impossible?
    Thanks.

    hi
    Invoice Splits 
    If you want to guarantee that invoices are created separately according to certain criteria, you can do this by defining certain split criteria. The following is an example of invoices split by material group:
    In Customizing for copying control, you can specify requirements for splitting to prevent sales orders or deliveries from being combined into a collective billing document.
    As a rule, the system combines into one billing document all transactions for the same customer, default billing date and sales organization.
    If data from the related reference documents differs in the header fields of the billing document, the system will automatically split the invoice
    An order contains terms of payment at header as well as item level. These are stored only at header level in the billing document, however. If there are different terms of payment in the reference documents, an invoice split will always be made.
    If data from the related reference documents differs in the item fields of the billing document, the system does not split the invoice.
    The order basis is stored at header level in the order and at item level in the billing document. The system does not split the invoice. If you require an invoice split, you must first define the appropriate split requirements in Customizing for copying control. Copying control depends on the following criteria:
    Billing Document Type
    reference document type (i.e. type of order, delivery or billing document on which the sales document is based)
    item category in the reference document
    You can also display a split analysis to discover why an invoice split has occurred.

  • Error message while creating splitting rules.

    Hi Gurus,
    I am getting the below error mrssage while tryng to create a splitting rule(Z**0000012 copied from 0000000012)
    Item category 20000 not obligatory in process 0000/Z002
         Message no. GLT1203
    Diagnosis
         You have selected item category 20000. This item category is not
         obligatory in accounting transaction 0000, variant Z002. This could
         prevent the splitting rule for an actual document being processed
         correctly.
    System Response
         Item category cannot 20000 be entered.
    Procedure
         Either choose an item category marked as obligatory, or define 20000 as
         obligatory.
    for Business transaction 0000 & tansaction varient Z002 item category 20000 nothing  is selected(i.e forbidd,rquired,only once)
    Please help me solve this & go forward with th coonfig

    Hello,
    Why not define 20000 as obligatory? It seems the only way to go.
    Sorry if I was not very helpful.

  • Splitting Rule & Instructions in Scheduling Agreement

    Hai Guys,
    I am creating a splitting rule and assign it to the instruction in the customizing for Scheduling afgreements.
    But this stands alone as I couldnt find any place to assign this instruction - say Doc type or schedule line category
    Can somebody teach me the confing of a schedule agreement?
    Regards,
    Maheshwaran. I

    Thanks yaar! I am still unclear about it. I have created two deliv split instructions MAH, MAI. Don't know whether the system considers even one of these two.
    How & Where to assign the instructions with dely schedule type? Please throw some more light on this.
    Thanks in advance.

  • No Transfer Rule(s) available for the transfer structure 0FI_AR_4_DB in the

    Hi friends
      when i have trying to transport infocube 0fiar_c03 with infosource 0fi_ar_4 from development client.the following message has shown as error "No Transfer Rule(s) available for the transfer structure 0FI_AR_4_DB in the control table".pl let me know the possible cause of error.
    Rgds
    Tukuna

    dear Tukuna,
    it seems the transfer rules not transport.
    try in dev, change transfer rules,
    and from menu extras (beside go to) -> object directory entry -> transfer rules -> in next screen, check if package/development class is $TMP, click pencil icon, and choose your package/dev class, system will prompt request, create new request and transport.
    <b>if package/dev class isn't $TMP</b>, try following,
    rsa1->transport connection->left panel choose 'object type' and middle panel 'infosource' and 'select objects', and choose '0fi_ar_4' and 'transfer', then you will see 0fi_ar_4 in right panel, we will use this infosource to collect transfer rules.
    you may need to specify the source system assignment in transport connection when collecting objects, click 'source system assignment' and make sure your r/3 source system is marked.
    choose collection mode 'manual' and grouping 'in dataflow before', and 'execute', after objects collection finished, expand the infosource and make sure your transfer rules and datasources are there and marked. click transport (truck icon).
    also make sure you maintain the source system mapping in TARGET system (QAS), rsa1->tools->source system mapping (tcode rslgmp), fill 'orgsrcsys' with r/3 dev and 'trgsrcsys' with r/3 QAS, do the same for BW Prod with r/3 qas for 'orgsrcsys' and r/3 prod for 'trgsrcsys'.
    hope this helps.

  • Rules of thumb for sizing an Oracle BPM 11g deployment

    Anyone out there have some rules of thumb they are using to size out an environment for Oracle BPM 11g? I know processing power can vary widely for process complexity and amount of data floating around. Still, I get asked questions like how much processing power do I need for this solution? I have a current client looking at 2500+ potential human workflow users with 1000 concurrent at peak load. Short of running some performance test myself and extrapolating numbers I am at a loss. Hoping some others can chime in with some thoughts.

    an update... my rule of thumb for 50 users has proven to be a bit high. Looks to be 30-40 per core when you split out the BPMN engine from other computing intensive processes such as the ESB. Without splitting up overall SOA/BPM functionality over multiple servers concurrent user counts of various technology really takes a hit.

Maybe you are looking for