Portal Upgrade Issues

Hi,
1.Our client is currently in EP6.2.0 and we are upgrading to ECC6.0 and BI 7.0 is there any necessity to upgrade EP to 2004s(EP 7.0)?
Do u recommend staying in same version or is it good to upgrade the EP7.0?
2.If we upgrading portal to EP7.0 having back end is CRM 4.0, will the portal upgrade support CRM 4.0. Or should we upgrade CRM 4.0 t CRM 5.0?
2.In order to estimate the complexity of a portal upgrade, what are the portal items that were customized I should consider.
Thanks In Advance,
Dheepa

Hi Dheepa,
First of all, if you are going to ECC6.0 its is mandatory that you move to the 7.0 platform (EP7 on 2004s) since the business packages and XSS applications are not supported for any other platform. So yes, upgrade you must.
In terms of CRM i am not qualified to advise. I suggest investigating the PAM and perhaps posting in the CRM forums.
When looking at the complexity of the upgrade you need to consider how many customized applications you have in place. If you use the KM solution there is a bit of work to do. Have a read through the upgrade guides and you will get a good feel for what issues you may face.
You may like to consider installing a fresh instance of EP7 and new deployment of the XSS applications onto it, since you are shifting from ITS to WebDynpro in the process. This ofcourse will depend on your analysis of your current environment and the new install vs' upgrade effort.
I would tend to lean towards a fresh installation if possible since this way you have a clean instance and can probably shift to 64bit OS and reap all the benifits that follow.
Cheers
Daniel

Similar Messages

  • Oracle portal upgrade issue

    Hi All,
    I upgraded the older 10.1.2 oracle portal TO oracle portal 10.1.4 on windows.
    Next step is i have to apply a patch. As i execute the patch related batch file it fails. it keeps giving me following error.
    MISSING_COMPONENT : oracle.webdb.midtier, 10.1.2.0.1
    This Oracle Home does not have components/versions required by the patch.
    ERROR: OPatch failed during pre-reqs check.
    OPatch returns with error code = 150
    what could be the issue and how to resolve ?
    thanks,
    pp

    are you getting these errors in the pre-upgrade logs or in the actual run?
    You would have to go to each of these lines individually in the upgrade logs and see what is the context of these errors and what are the specific details of the objects which are throwing these errors.
    For instance, go to the lines 7682-7700 and see what is causing these errors. which objects, and which exceptions in those objects.
    just as a side note:
    always make sure you do not have any invalid objects in your schemas with any kinds of compilation errors before running the upgrade scripts.
    syed

  • EHP Upgrade Issue - Java Stack

    Hi,
    Our Source System at NW 7.0 SP13 and we are upgrading the system to EHP1 SP03.
    Upgrade failed at Downtime > DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL phase.
    Error log:
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:                       com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.doExecute(AbstractPhaseType.java:863) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Exception has occurred during the execution of the phase.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:             com.sap.sdt.jspm.unattended.RequestController.addContextInfo(RequestController.java:178) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Deployment of queue sapjup-queue completed with error
    JSPM version is 7.01.3.0.15. Current JSPM log directory is /usr/sap/XPD/JC00/j2ee/JSPM/log/log_2009_09_09_16_09_42.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.createAndLogRapiException(SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.java:698) [Thread[main,5,main]]: The deployment of the queue failed.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.deploy.SAPJupJSPMDeployer.deployList(SAPJupJSPMDeployer.java:68) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Could not execute deployment of stack file /usr/sap/trans/EPS/in/XPD.xml.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:      com.sap.sdt.j2ee.phases.PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.execute(PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.java:519) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Error while executing DeploymentManager phase with action deploySlot. Check the log files for the specified action.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:906) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase UPGRADE/DEPLOYMENT_BASED_UPGRADE/DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL has been completed.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:907) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Start time: 2009/09/09 22:09:42.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:909) [Thread[main,5,main]]: End time: 2009/09/09 22:11:51.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:910) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Duration: 0:02:08.248.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:911) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase status is error.
    I went through the following link , proceeded with option 2, But still getting same error.  
    Portal Upgrade Issue
    Please advise the resolution for the issue I have.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Srinivas
    Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM
    Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM

    Issue resolved

  • NEW 9iAS PORTAL UPGRADE SCRIPTS NOW AVAILABLE

    Based on detailed customer and internal feedback, Oracle9iAS Portal Product Development is now making available NEW and significantly IMPROVED versions of the 9iAS Portal Upgrade Scripts as of 4/20/2001.
    [list]
    [*]Oracle9iAS Portal Upgrade Scripts (2.2/3.0.3.3.3 -> 3.0.6) for Windows NT
    [*]Oracle9iAS Portal Upgrade Scripts (2.2/3.0.3.3.3 -> 3.0.6) for Solaris
    [list]
    The upgrade scripts provided here (at the links above) will allow you to upgrade the following environments:
    a) Your existing WebDB 2.2 installations to Oracle9iAS Portal 3.0.6.
    b) Your existing Oracle Portal Early Adopters Release (3.0.3.3.3) to Oracle9iAS Portal 3.0.6.
    For specific upgrade documentation (also updated!), please consult the links below:
    [list]
    [*]Release notes for Oracle9iAS Portal 3.0.6 Upgrade
    [*]Oracle9iAS Portal Upgrade Guide for NT/2000
    [*]Oracle9iAS Portal Upgrade Guide for Solaris
    [list]
    NOTE: For the final step of the upgrade process, you will also need to download additional upgrade scripts to take you from Oracle9iAS Portal 3.0.6 to the current 3.0.8.9.8 Oracle9iAS Portal release.
    NOTE: Scripts and Doc for the 9iAS Portal 3.0.6 to 3.0.8 Upgrade are expected to be made available later this week (April 24-27)
    The following is a list of bugs and issues addressed with the latest 9iAS Portal 3.0.6 upgrade scripts.
    Upgrade Bugs Fixed for the 2.2 -> 3.0.6 upgrade
    1697813 - NT SCRIPT IS ASKING FOR VALUES 3 AND 4
    1697862 - APPIMP.CSH
    1697863 - UNEXPECTED ERROR ENCOUNTERED ERRORS OCCURED IN APPIMP.CSH
    1697828 - SB: MISSING LINKS FOR THE FOR ITEMS
    1697781 - MIGRATION FAILED
    1714261 : APPLICATION IMPORT SCRIPT FAILS
    1716379 : IMPORT SCRIPT TERMINATES ABNORMALLY
    1712877 : EXPORTING A APPLICATION FAILS
    1715551 : NO ACTION LINKS FOR LOVS WHEN IMPORTED FROM WEBDB SCHEMA !!
    1740211 : AFTER UPGRADE EDITING THE SCHEMA GIVING ERROR
    1697795 - MISSING TEMPLATE AFTER UPGRADE (DOC BUG)
    1697839 - 22-306:DOC: NEEDS TO DOCUMENT
    1697835 - 22-306:DOC: NEEDS TO DOCUMENT
    Additional Bug Fixes
    1703032 - IMPROVE PERFORMANCE FOR THE FOLDER IN EDIT-MODE.
    1703040 - EDIT LINKS APPEAR ON FOLDERS EVEN THOUGH USER DOES NOT HAVE PRIVILEGES.
    1703052 - SUBFOLDERS UNDER THE FOLDERS NOT ALIGNED PROPERLY
    1703063 - PERSPECTIVE PAGE RENDERS SLOWLY
    1703070 - NAVBAR LOGON/LOGOFF LINKS IS HARDCODED TO GO THE CONTENT AREA ROOT FOLDER
    1703072 - NAVBAR LOGON/LOGOFF LINKS DOES NOT WORK FOR PERSONAL FOLDERS.
    1689813 - ITEM LINK IN SEARCH RESULTS SHOULD BE DIRECT ACCESS URL
    null

    Richard,
    You'll need to have 1.0.2.2 to be installed on the middle tier before performing the upgrade for your portal 3.0.9 upgrade repository on the database end. So that means, you'll need to wait for the Linux download of iAS 1.0.2.2 to be available before beginning your upgrade of the portal repository, assuming that your middle tier of iAS is also on a Linux box.
    iAS 1.0.2.2 does indeed include Portal 3.0.9, of which Portal 3.0.9 components will be installed during the upgrade process along with the upgrade of the middle tier. During the upgrade process, the installer (from my personal experience on NT), will notify you that it is performing an upgrade installation of your middle tier, provided that you specified the middle tier's ORACLE_HOME when executing the oracle installer.
    Just be sure to read and follow the 9iAS Migration guide before beginning your upgrade of the middle tier to iAS 1.0.2.2. After upgrading the middle tier to 1.0.2.2, the actual upgrade of the portal repository was extremely simple by comparison.
    The upgrade of the portal repository took a few hours (my recommendation is to invoke it off before leaving for the evening), and it will leave a detailed logfile for you to peruse afterwards, if you choose).
    Best Regards,
    Harry

  • Portal upgrade

    Guys,
    We have a windows NW04 Portal landscape and are planning to upgrade it. In order to build a sandbox landscape which we shall be used to run a test upgrade, we took a image of the development portal backend, frontend, ITS server and R/3. Once these images were copied over to newer windows servers (except R3 which is AIX), we began changing the hostnames on profiles, parameter files, environment variables etc.
    Issue:
    Message Server refuses to start. In the logs I see that it is trying to start with START_SCS01_<OLDHOSTNAME> instead of START_SCS01_<NEWHOSTNAME> and so is sapcpe too. I have checked all the profiles in the directory and all the instances of oldhostname are already changed to newer hostname. The environment variables and the registry has been modified too however no luck.
    Has anyone encountered similar issue?
    Also can anyone please post the approach he/she used to do portal upgrade from NW04 to NW2007.
    Thanks.

    Hi!
    You cannot change the hostname of a java-Stack (like for a Portal) by simply changing profiles. You need to stick with the old hostnames if you want to use the 'cloning' procedure or you need to do a proper system copy with sapinst to the new hostname. Another option could be to follow the note that describes how to change the hostname of a Java-Stack - for a sandbox this could be ok, but maybe it's worth rethinking this and using the system-copy tools that will do the job for you (and will do it properly and in  a supported fashion).
    Kind regards,
    Jörg

  • Portal upgrade challanges from 7.0 to 7.1.1 (Netweaver CE EPH1)

    Hello Everybody,
    We are thinking of portal upgrade in our landscape. We are using EP 7.0 SP14 right now and planning to upgrade the portal becuase of some known issues.
    While, deciding to upgrade, we have two options:
    1. Upgrade to EP 7.0 SPS21
    2. Upgrade to EP 7.1.1 (NetWeaver CE EPH1)
    We are evaluating which one whould be the better option.
    Did anybody do upgrade from EP7.0 to EP 7.1.1 recently? If yes, did you face any challanges?
    If you can post those challanges over here, it would be helpful for me as well as others to know what to consider when upgrading the system.
    In our Portal system, we have not done any development work for portal. Most of the changes are configuration related which invloves below:
    1. Iview, pages, worksets, roles creation
    2. XML forms creation for home page contents
    3. UWL configuration for GP
    4. GP process configuration
    5. SSO implementation with different backend systems
    6. MDM business package
    7. SRM business package
    Please let me know if you have faced any challanges while doing upgrade from EP 7.0 to EP 7.1.1.
    Thanks,
    Bhavik

    Thanks for the response.
    Can you please let me know what kind of challanges you faced and what all points do we have to keep in mind while doing it?
    It would help me to streamline the activities while doing the upgrade.
    Thanks,
    Bhavik

  • Upgrade issues OBIEE 10g to 11g along with OBIA upgrade

    Hi,
    I have to upgrade OBIEE 10.1.3.4.1 to OBIEE 11.1.1.5 along with OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5(Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1) at my client location and I have very little knowledge on it. and want to know/have help documents for upgrade.
    And if anyone in the forums involved in upgrade please list the errors/issues occured during upgrade and after upgrade.
    1. OBIEE 10g to 11g upgrade issues??
    2. OBIA OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5 upgrade issues along with 10g to 11g??
    3. Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1 upgrade issues??
    4. DAC upgrade issues??
    any response for my questions is appreciated.
    Thanks
    Jay.
    Edited by: Jay on Apr 11, 2012 9:11 AM

    HI Jay,
    We cannot explained thread list here, If you get any errors plz post me,will try to help out.
    This is oracle document link - This document has given step by step with screen shots upgration for 10g to 11g ,Please refer the below link.
    http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/fmw/bi/bi11115/upgrade/upgrade_to_11g.htm
    http://obieemanu.blogspot.in/2011/05/rpd-upgration-from-10g-to-11g.html
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/upgrade.1111/e10125/ua_command_line.htm#ASMAS149
    Award points it is useful.
    Thanks,
    satya

  • Portal display issue in Portal 7.3 version

    Hi Experts,
    We are using portal 7.3 vesion,one of the user getting portal disply issue,it is not appearing proper ess portal screen.
    we checked with other user,they will not getting the same issue,it is only one use faceing this issue.
    please let me know what is the root cause of the issue.
    Thank you in advance..
    Regards,
    Jyothi

    Hi All,
    pradyp:  sorry for the delay reply, yes they have adobe flash player in their systems.
    in google chrome and mozila, its looking good. actually we have two company users like A and B,A company user dont have this problem but B company some of the user( only mss role users) have this issue.
    Earier we have assigned  new theme with new logo to the B company users through rule collection.
    my understanding the problem arraised with new theme with new logo.am i right ?
    Could you please help me any one.
    Regards,
    Jyothi

  • Report generation toolkit upgrade issues

    I have created multiple vi's in that utilize the previous report generation toolkits specifically using the Generate Report Get Data to Modify.vi and the Generate Report Set Modified Data.vi.  Obviously the report reference has now changed in 8.6's version of the report generation toolkit and these vi's do not exist in the 8.6 library anymore.  What vi's do I need to replace these functions with to make this code work.  Can anyone tell me what the work around is to solving this problem.  This is a picture of the code.
    BJD1613
    Lead Test Tools Development Engineer
    Philips Respironics
    Certified LV Architect / Instructor
    Attachments:
    code.JPG ‏92 KB

    Hi BJD1613,
    The Report Generation VIs on the LabVIEW Palettes mutate properly. However, you may run into upgrade issues if VIs distributed with LabVIEW, but not available in the Palettes are used in the code. Hence, I would caution against using them for the same reason.
    In this case, the specific references do exist in the report generation classes; however, since they are private, they cannot be accessed by VIs outside the respective classes. A temporary workaround for now is mentioned in the following KB 4OOCSJ4M Getting References in Report Generation Toolkit 1.1.3 with LabVIEW 8.6.  
    This was reported to R&D (CAR# 123064) for further investigation

  • Upgrade issues list needed

    Hi,
    We're currently on 4.6b and going to upgrade to ECC6 with unicode I'm trying to compile a list point taken care converting to unicode from ABAP technical point of view. Does anyone have such a list?
    Some points i shortlisted are :
    1) Use GUI_UPLOAD and GUI_DOWNLOAD rather than WS_UPLOAD and WS_DOWNLOAD.
    2) Structures or table headers that contain non-character data need to be identical when moving, comparing, selecting into, updating from, etc.
    3) OPEN DATASET filename IN TEXT MODE FOR INPUT ENCODING DEFAULT.
    I know there are others. Any help would be appreciated.
    aRs

    Check the below links
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=268386&highlight=upgrade+issues
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=263434&highlight=upgrade+issues
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=261051&highlight=upgrade+issues
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=253316&highlight=upgrade+issues

  • Portal Upgrade from EP6.0sp10 to EP6.0sp18

    Hi All,
      I am totally new to portal upgrade.we have current version of portal as follows:
    portal version is: 6.0.10.2.0
    KMC version is   : 6.0.10.1.0 (NW04 SPS10 Patch 1)
    Trex Version     : 6.1.10.01 
    1. I am little confuse about whats the difference between Upgrading from EP6.0sp10 to "<b>EP6.0sp18/ NW04sp18</b>".Is the process for doing above is  same or different.
    2. I heard from SAP that TREX must  be upgraded first before KMC and Portal.Is it true? whats is reason for that
    ?what should be latest SP and patch for TREX?any documents?
    3. Is there any specific sequence to upgrade like TREX->WAS>portal>KMC?
    4. What about customisations objects,will that be seriously affected after upgrade?How to prevent that?
    can anybody give the Basic knowledge of upgrade and process flow.
    Thanks in Advance.Help will be greatly appreciated.
    Amit

    Hi Amit,
    EP6 SP18 ist the actual Service Pack for Enterprise Portal. NW04 SPS(!) 18 is the complete Service Pack Stack for the NetWeaver platform. So if you want SP18 for your portal installation, you should get the whole NetWeaver platform in use for that to SPS18 (as you wrote, for EP this is normally WAS, EP, KM, TREX, eventually NWDS).
    TREX normally has the same counting as the rest, but in fact at the moment there is no SP18 for TREX, but it is renumbered again. The actual version reads TREX 6.1 Patch 26.
    Sequence is WAS -> portal -> KMC -> TREX. Anyhow, you should not await a stable version if using mixed SPs, especially if mixing 10 with 18 So get all in line and then restart working with your installation.
    As you normally shouldn't have customized standard objects but copied them into your own namespace and worked on these, there shouldn't be a problem. If you haven't gone this way, with such an update you will learn how urgent it is to keep this in mind --- never change standard objects...
    Hope it helps
    Detlev

  • Portal Upgrade from Nw04 6.0 to Nw04s 7.0

    Hi all,
    I’m trying to perform the portal upgrade from version 6.0 Nw04 SP 19 to version 7.0 Nw04s.
    During the preparation I obtain the following error:
    #Java###The software component com.wilytech.jmxservice/wilytech.com could not be read from the BC_COMPVERS table; the table schema may be outdated. Fix it and then repeat the phase from the beginning.##
    I have implemented note n 873624 in order to align the keyname and the keyvendor in sap manifest.mf but with no luck, the detect start release component fails with the same error.
    Any suggestion?
    Thanks and regards 
    alessio

    Hi,
    you can find a good startup in the guide <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5e1226c7-0601-0010-7d82-a8134e833150">Enterprise Portal Migration Update</a>
    hope this helps.
    alessio

  • Portal Upgrade Failure

    Hi!
    I ran the portal upgrade script against a copy of my production database to bring it up from 3.0.8.9.8 to 3.0.9. About an hour after the script was running, the database abruptly came down. When I looked in the altert log, there were numerous ORA-07445, ORA-12805 and ORA-00600 errors that only materialized after this upgrade script started running. It filled my system up with thousands of trace files and core subdirectories which I had to delete but the filesystem never filled up. Now I can open the database but it won't stay open for very long before it abruptly shuts down. Here's a startup from my alert log:
    Fri Jul 20 14:13:51 2001
    Starting ORACLE instance (normal)
    LICENSE_MAX_SESSION = 0
    LICENSE_SESSIONS_WARNING = 0
    LICENSE_MAX_USERS = 0
    Starting up ORACLE RDBMS Version: 8.1.7.0.0.
    System parameters with non-default values:
    processes = 165
    shared_pool_size = 267665203
    large_pool_size = 614400
    java_pool_size = 20971520
    control_files = /u01/oracle/oradata/play/control01.ctl, /u01/oracle
    /oradata/play/control02.ctl, /u01/oracle/oradata/play/control03.ctl
    db_block_buffers = 58021
    db_block_size = 8192
    compatible = 8.1.0
    log_buffer = 163840
    log_checkpoint_interval = 10000
    log_checkpoint_timeout = 1800
    max_enabled_roles = 30
    remote_login_passwordfile= EXCLUSIVE
    db_domain = msd.ray.com
    instance_name = play
    service_names = play.msd.ray.com
    mts_dispatchers = (PROTOCOL=TCP)(PRE=oracle.aurora.server.SGiopServer
    sort_area_size = 165536
    sort_area_retained_size = 165536
    db_name = play
    open_cursors = 300
    os_authent_prefix =
    job_queue_processes = 1
    job_queue_interval = 60
    background_dump_dest = /u01/oracle/admin/play/bdump
    user_dump_dest = /u01/oracle/play/udump
    max_dump_file_size = 10000
    core_dump_dest = /u01/oracle/admin/play/cdump
    PMON started with pid=2
    DBW0 started with pid=3
    LGWR started with pid=4
    CKPT started with pid=5
    SMON started with pid=6
    RECO started with pid=7
    SNP0 started with pid=8
    Fri Jul 20 14:13:57 2001
    starting up 1 shared server(s) ...
    starting up 1 dispatcher(s) for network address '(ADDRESS=(PARTIAL=YES)(PROTOCOL
    =TCP))'...
    Fri Jul 20 14:13:57 2001
    alter database mount
    Fri Jul 20 14:14:02 2001
    Successful mount of redo thread 1, with mount id 741551593.
    Fri Jul 20 14:14:02 2001
    Database mounted in Exclusive Mode.
    Completed: alter database mount
    Fri Jul 20 14:14:02 2001
    alter database open
    Beginning crash recovery of 1 threads
    Fri Jul 20 14:14:02 2001
    Thread recovery: start rolling forward thread 1
    Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 1 Seq 3146 Reading mem 0
    Mem# 0 errs 0: /u01/oracle/oradata/play/redo01.log
    Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 2 Seq 3147 Reading mem 0
    Mem# 0 errs 0: /u01/oracle/oradata/play/redo02.log
    Fri Jul 20 14:14:04 2001
    Thread recovery: finish rolling forward thread 1
    Thread recovery: 140 data blocks read, 139 data blocks written, 893 redo blocks
    read
    Crash recovery completed successfully
    Fri Jul 20 14:14:04 2001
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 3148
    Thread 1 opened at log sequence 3148
    Current log# 3 seq# 3148 mem# 0: /u01/oracle/oradata/play/redo03.log
    Successful open of redo thread 1.
    Fri Jul 20 14:14:04 2001
    SMON: enabling cache recovery
    SMON: enabling tx recovery
    Fri Jul 20 14:14:07 2001
    Errors in file /u01/oracle/admin/play/bdump/play_p003_1051.trc:
    ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ktugru()+72] [SIGBUS] [Invalid addr
    ess alignment] [21] [] []
    Fri Jul 20 14:14:07 2001
    Errors in file /u01/oracle/admin/play/bdump/play_p004_1053.trc:
    ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ktugru()+72] [SIGBUS] [Invalid addr
    ess alignment] [21] [] []
    Fri Jul 20 14:14:14 2001
    Completed: alter database open
    Fri Jul 20 14:14:56 2001
    SMON: Restarting fast_start parallel rollback
    Fri Jul 20 14:14:56 2001
    Errors in file /u01/oracle/admin/play/bdump/play_smon_1035.trc:
    ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kqrprl()+92] [SIGSEGV] [Address not
    mapped to object] [2] [] []
    ORA-12805: parallel query server died unexpectedly
    Fri Jul 20 14:16:01 2001
    PMON: terminating instance due to error 474
    Instance terminated by PMON, pid = 1027
    I am running Oracle 8.1.7, 9iAS 1.0.2.0.1 (have a separate 1.0.2.2 which I'll point to the upgraded portal), and Solaris 2.7. There were no errors in the alert log before I started the upgrade script.
    Has anyone else upgrading just their portal from 3.0.8.9.8 to 3.0.9 experienced this difficulty. Thank GAWD this wasn't my prod portal...
    Much thanks for any reply....Kate

    Thank you Bob! My problem turned out to be that the database backup I used to restore a database copy was actually taken outside of my backup window before the database was shutdown. I should have known that using the init profile allowcorrupted_logs was a harbinger of worse things. Anyway, since the database was completely destroyed by the upgrade script, I used the next week's backup to restore a copy of the databse -- this time with much better results. The upgrade script worked fine after this.
    Thanks for the heads up on the bug though. It will probably be useful. Thanks again.

  • Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue

    hello ,
    We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
    externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
    these errors in 3L!
    After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
    application hanging.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated!
    thanks
    suma
    Here is an Excerpt of the log file
    Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [501, 152]
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    "MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
    INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
    Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [501, 152]
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    "MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
    INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
    regards,
    Suma Venkatesh

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkatesh, Suma
    Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:39 PM
    To: '[email protected]'
    Subject: Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue
    hello ,
    We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
    externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
    these errors in 3L!
    After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
    application hanging.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated!
    thanks
    suma
    Here is an Excerpt of the log file
    Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [501, 152]
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    "MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
    laxrc2.
    INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
    Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [501, 152]
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    "MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
    laxrc2.
    INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
    regards,
    Suma Venkatesh

  • R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login using forms:Please help****urgent

    We have recently upgraded our instance from 11.5.9 to 12.0.4 in Windows 2003 server.
    We are unable to login to forms after upgrade, however we are able access self service responsibilities without any issues.
    We are getting APP-FND-01496 when we access any forms responsibility. We have tried all possible metalink notes with no luck.
    Any help to resolve this issue will be appreciated.

    Duplicate thread ...
    R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help
    Re: R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help

Maybe you are looking for

  • Outlook 2010 not responding, hangs, freezes or stopped working when going from one email to another

    Hi all, I have an issue with one of my clients running Office Pro Plus 2010 32bit on windows 7 pro with exchange 2010 service pack 3 where they have voicemails coming in as .wav files and have a rule set up to automatically going into a sub-folder ca

  • Help debugging JVM crash on linux

    Does anybody have any tips on debugging JVM crashes? I have a third-party shared library that I link in and use through JNI bindings. When I use this third party application with the 1.6.0 JVM on red hat enterprise linux, it causes the JVM to unpredi

  • Command to Re-Conform a specific clip?

    I have a project with many R3D files(Red One and MX). And it takes a long time to conform the media when I open the project. I have noticed that conforming will stop for a while then randomly start up again like 15 min later. I am having audio issues

  • Set Desktop Photo different than Iphoto version

    When I choose a photo to "set desktop," it appears differently than the one in Iphoto. It is overly saturated. I'm using a 22" external monitor when I see this, resolution set at 1680x1050, 60Hz, millions. The picture looks good in emails and Preview

  • Regular Expression Counting

    I wanted to make a specific count for regular expression pattern in the form AA####A as [a-zA-z](2)\d(4)[a-zA-z] also tried <[a-zA-z](2)><\d(4)>[a-zA-z] What am I doing wrong?