Post to AP transaction from SD billing

Hi,
it is not a problem to create an accounting document from SD billing.
However, I had a requirement to allow to post some figures to the Account Payable from the same transacton.
This means
Can I post to AR and at the same time create a posting to my AP account?
please assist
Thanks

Hi,
Account keys are speciefied in front of each condition in Pricing procedure,for this keys G/L account is assigned in VKOA.
Once you create billing document then this G/L accounts are determined.
Now wether it is AR or AP this can be decide by cost element & cost element categories
element categories - cost , revenue, Sale deductions etc.
Now your G/L account category is Revenue then it goes under revenue in Profit & loss statement,
If your G/L account category is cost then it goes under liability in P/L statement.
For more details consult with your FICO team, they will tell ,how to configure.
Kapil

Similar Messages

Posting date from CRM Billing doc cancellation

hello,
I have an issue in the CRM billing documents transferred from CRM to ECC. When do a biling doc, the document and posting are taken from the document date in CRM billing document.
But when I do a cancellation of the billing document, the document date is taken from the document date in CRM, however the posting date is taken from the Value date in CRM. We have made some exits in CRM billing where the value date is determined as document date + 5 days.
I am not sure why the cancellation takes place on the value date. Can anyone here please explain and also tell how this can be made as billing document.
thanks in advance,
jigar

SB,
Have a look at user-exit USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBKD in include MV45AFZZ
PeteA

Transaction from production order always post into dummy profit center

Dear SAP experts,
I have problem with profit center.
I have material master "A1" and "A1B1". The process is "A1" is raw material for making "A1B1".
The CO team forgot to entry the profit center field in both of material in their material master.
So when there are posting " material consumed " and "good receipt" in production order,PL account "material consumed" (happen when good issue to production order) and PL account "production output" (happen when good receipt from same production order) are mapping to dummy profit center.
This because of the CO team forgot to entry the profit center field in both of material in their material master, so ssystem post to dummy profit center.
So I change both of the material masters and entry the profit center field (so it's not blank).
But when the PP team make new production order and post the same transaction, it still post into dummy profit center (the profit center that I entry in material master is not read by system).
Even when the PP team create new material with the same spesification,entry the profit center field and run the same transaction, the dummy still posted by system.
How to solve this problem?
Kindly help me please.
regards

Hi Anu
After maintaining the PC in the mat master, create a new Prod order w/o copying from the Old Prod Order...
Once you maintain PC in A1B1 - It should update the Prod Order of A1B1 as well
br, Ajay M

Data inconsistency: posting with restricted transaction type (FAA_POST047)

Hi colleagues!
I have the following error:
Data inconsistency: posting with restricted transaction type
Message no. FAA_POST047
Diagnosis
You are trying to post in company code 1000 with transaction type 130 in ledger group 0N. According to table TABWA, this transaction type is limited. Nonetheless, according to your entries, you want to post to area 11.
System Response
Using limited transaction types is obsolete and would lead to an inconsistent posting in this situation. The system rejects the posting.
Procedure
Use a transaction type that is not limited. And, if possible, choose the ledger group and/or depreciation area on the initial screen.
According to specific accounting we shouldn't post to one of the depr. area, so most of the tr.types are restricted to post to all areas except this one.
Because of this, posting from MM with acc.assignment 'A' is impossible - I have this error.
Any ideas how to solve?
Thanks in advance

Hi Anton
This looks like your transaction type -130 is limited to post only in ledger group-0N as per the transaction type configuration. Due to which system is unable to post all the ledgers and hence this lead to inconsistency.
Please verify the transaction type 130- in configuration T code - OAYA and see if it is restricted by depreciation area (eventually allow to post only ledger group- 0N.
Tcode - OAYA (Limit Transaction Types to Depreciation Areas)
please verify and let us know the update. hope this helps
Best Regards
Jomon

How to post an Acquisition Transaction?

Hi,
I have already configured the consolidation of investments in SEM-BCS, however when i want to run the consolidation of investments, the system is saying "There is no consolidation of investments detected" hence i believe i need to post the acquisition transaction first so that this process can run.
The acquisition transaction to be posted is whereby a Subsidiary from a group is purchased by another subsidiary under the same group as follows :-
Before Acquisition :-
Group G1 = Subsid S1 + Subsid S2 + Subsid S3
After Acquisition of S2 by S3 :-
Group G1 = Subsid S1 + Subsid S3
Whereby Subsid S3 will contain Subsid S2 under it.
My question is, how do i post this transaction in SEM-BCS?
1) Do i have to post this in R3 using a journal and then the SEM-BCS will pickup this from R3? Or there is a special transaction screen in SEM BCS where i can post this kind of diversiture transaction directly into SEM BCS?
2) If i were to post this using a journal in R3, do i have to assign the trading partner values on the GL accounts so that the system knows this is a transaction involving inter-companies acquisitions?
Thanks in advance.

The posting of the acquisition depends on the COI configuration for location of values. If it uses totals, then an antry in the source ledger or posting level 01 or 10 in BCS to record the acquisitions should suffice. If the location of values for acquisitions is set to use additional financial data (AFD) then it must be posted in BCS via the AFD task.
Further, if the acquisition is to be posted in the source GL it is important to have the subsidiary as the trading partner on the investment account. The mapping normally transfers this as the investee for the investment account. It may be necessary for you to also update the mappings to ensure this is the case.
For acquisition, it is also important that the cons group master data has the same correspoonding period as the period of first consolidation for the subsidiaries being acquired. Otherwise you will get a message telling you that the period of first consolidation is incorrect or something of that nature.

Calling SAP transaction from WebDynpro

HI,
Could someone post a link as to how I may call a SAP transaction from a webdynpro.
Will this be an external call to R/3 or can i get it embedded in my dynpro.......
Tnks..

Hi,
You can call by creating external window method.
create LINK to URL or LINK TO ACTION according to requirement, for this. write code in onaction of that.
data: iv_url type string value 'http://<server>:<port>/sap/bc/gui/sap/its/webgui?~transaction=*se38 RS38M-PROGRAMM=rsparam;DYNP_OKCODE=SHOP'.
data: api_component type ref to if_wd_component,
 window_manager type ref to if_wd_window_manager,
 window type ref to if_wd_window.
api_component = wd_comp_controller->wd_get_api( ).
window_manager = api_component->get_window_manager( ).
window = window_manager->create_external_window(
 url = iv_url
 modal = abap_false ).
window->open( ).
Cheers,
Kris.

BAPI for calling Z transaction From NON-SAP system

hi all, am new to BAPI i want to know that can we call any standard or Z transaction from NON-SAP system using BAPI if yes then plz let me know how.???
thanx...

BAPI's are not used for calling transactions. They have the same result though, a business partner for example kan be created, and maintained via the GUI, but it can also be done via a BAPI. These BAPI's are created for calling them from (non-) SAP systems since they are remote enabled. However, this means that the calling application / party will have to 'build' some sort of application themselves in order to call these BAPI's from 'outside' of the SAP system.
The calling application will have to have access to the system, which can be maintained in the remote destination transaction SM59.
But enough of this, there are lots and lots of posts on SDN about BAPI's, remote destination etc.

Execute Business Transaction from xMII via XI to SAP R/3

Hello everyone,
I have a requirement to post the SAP R/3 transaction from xMII via XI. Does anyone one could give me the steps needs to follow to accomplish this.
Thanks,
Mahesh

Mahesh,
So as i understand your flow is xMII -> XI -> SAP ECC. So basically in this case u can setup XI to host a web service and xMII can call the web-service and post the data to XI. You will have to get the WSDL for the XI Web Service and then use it in the Web Service action block in xMII to consume. You will also need to setup the soap adapter in XI to receive the web service call from xMII. Once xMII calls the web service, XI can then update the data into SAP ECC either thru Idoc or RFC adapter.
So once your trigger point in xMII is activated, it should call the BLS which in turn will call the XI Web Service and post the data to XI.
In case the scenario is the other way round you can also host your BLS as a Web Service in xMII. XI can then call the web service and send the data to xMII. Alternatively you can also use the http post action block in xMII to do the same.
Let me know if you need anymore info.
Thanks,
Kapil.

Restriction of posting date in transaction CO11N for partial confirmations

Hi all,
 I am trying to restrict(by checking thru an exit) the posting date in co11n , for this i m using enhancement CONFPP04.
 Import parameter AFRUD_IMP IS USED.
 Now when i m putting production order no , operation activity no.(for e.g 10 , 20 etc ) and posting date IN SEL SCREEN OF CO11N
 AFRUD_IMP-BUDAT( POSTING DATE ) CONTAINS VALUE in debugging mode , hence i m getting the value of posting date
 and in that case check is written in code. This is the case of full confirmation.
 But in case of partial confirmation i have to give production order no , operation activity no , *Partial confirmed qty * and posting date , in this case the posting date value changes to 0 in the debug mode ie.
AFRUD_IMP-BUDAT is showing 0 and hence no calculation can be done base on the date.
 Our requirement is such that if there is a prd order no say X,
then in CO11N if user enters prd no X , operation activity no 10 , post date say D1
then again for prd no X , operation activity no 20 , post date of activity 20 should not be less than D1
SIMAILARY for X, ACTIVITY 30 , post date should not less than that of activity 20. and so on.
 But if partial quantity is mentioned value of AFRUD_IMP-BUDAT is becoming null.
 If anyone knows about this scenario please share.
Thanks and regards
Pankaj Gupta

Hi, In the T-code Mb31
The Posting Date which is used is when entering the document in Financial Accounting or Controlling. The fiscal year and the period for which an update of the accounts specified in the document or cost elements is made, are derived from this posting date.
When entering documents, the system checks whether the posting date entered is allowed by means of the posting period permitted.But this posting date can differ from both the entry date (day of entry into the system) and the document date (day of creation of the original document).This is for the practical purpose .
So its for the Monthly permitted and not for a day or range .
Secondly when you are saying :
"We want this default date to get freeze the moment you enter
the transaction (MB31). If you are opting for second option we want
some flexibility to change the date as required."
Both freezing and opting for changes is not possible , either one can occur .
You can freeze/display mode only the field for the T-code and the document type, but that will not solve your problem .
What i understand from the description is you want to Do GR on A particular date or GR should be allowed after a particular date . Please let me know if this is the case then there's a way around to do this that is you can do GR and Post on the dates near to your desirable dates .
cheers KP

P.O.'s Posting to ME9F Transaction

Hi All,
I am posting the P.O.'s to ME9F Transaction by using session method. Suppose if any of the purchase order fails to get posted into the transaction is there any way of getting this details. I have to shoot a MAIL that the particular P.O. failed.
Please let me know the solution ASAP.
Regards,
Suresh

Hi,
Yes, the solution depends on communication protocol which you want to use.
Option1: SAP receives the data through IDOC from EPOS and pass these values to BAPI BAPI_RE_SALES_REP_REPORT
Option2: In case if you are using any middle-ware, middle-ware receives the data from EPOS and tell your middle-ware consultant to consume BAPI BAPI_RE_SALES_REP_REPORT in middle-ware. You can use .Net connector / Java connector in middle-ware to consume SAP BAPI's directly.
rgds,
Srini

What triggers idoc posting in outbound message from sap ?

Do change or create events can be used to trigger Posting to IDOC? Have any body used idoc for outbound message sending from SAP?

Hi Reddy,
Posting IDoc Packets
Two groups of function modules are used to post IDocs:
· Function modules which process IDocs in mass. These transfer packets of IDocs for which individual IDocs are updated in the same Logical Unit of Work (LUW).
· Function modules which process one IDoc per call.
· INPUTTYP contains the code for posting function modules.
To display the function module's INPUTTYP on the ALE Development screen, choose IDoc ® Inbound Processing ® Function Module® Maintain Attributes (BD51).
INPUTTYP can contain the following values:
· "0", for function modules which process IDocs in packets.
"1" and "2" for function modules which process one IDoc per call:
If you post the IDocs immediately, the SAP sending system determines the packet size. ALE inbound processing can recognize if the posting function module allows packet processing and if so, passes the IDoc packet to it. If not, the IDoc packet is split into individual IDocs.
If IDocs are posted in the background, you can specify the size of the IDocs to be generated in the program RBDAPP01.
If you use function modules that can process IDocs in mass, the database load is reduced.
If you group IDocs into packets, this may also be practical for function modules that post inbound IDocs one at a time, because the ALE layer calls the function module several times in the same dialog process, thereby reducing the administrative load on the SAP system.
If program RBDAPP01 carries out the background processing, as a guide, you should use a packet size of between 20 and 100 IDocs.
Packet processing and parallelism complement one another. Packet processing and parallelism complement each other, although in some situations they may compete with each other. If the size of the packet is too big, this may mean that not all the available dialog processes are being used.
Scheduling IDoc Posting
There are two ways of posting IDocs in ALE inbound processing:
·        Immediate processing:
Upon receipt inbound IDocs are immediately released for posting. ALE inbound processing splits the IDoc packets into individual IDocs.
·        Background processing
Inbound IDocs and IDoc packets are first saved in the database. IDoc packets are split into single IDocs beforehand.
The program RBDAPP01 later releases the saved IDocs for processing. Single IDocs can be put into packets and then processed.
Perform the following steps:
1.       Set-up background processing (IDoc/ALE area menu):
IDoc Interface/ALE ® Administration ® Runtime Settings ® Partner Profiles (WE20)
Then the required setting is: In the detail screen Inbound Parameters select the option Trigger by background program.
2.       Schedule posting (ALE customizing):
Transaction SALE ® Set-Up System Monitoring ®
         Posting IDocs in Recipient System ®Schedule
You can also process the IDocs manually by passing them to the posting function module. In ALE Administration choose Monitoring ®Status Monitor (BD87), select the IDocs and then select Process.
Regards,
Kumar.

R12: how to show ap invoices and ar transactions from same party id

Is it possible to see the open ap invoices and open ar transactions from the same party id
in one screen or report?

I'm sorry your posts keep getting locked despite you asking not to have them locked. To avoid this in the future, if you accidentally post in the wrong forum, edit the post in the wrong forum to remove the content, and change the titlte to please ignore or something similar.
This is the response I made on your post in the SQL PL/SQL forum since I will not be able to respond on that one.
The exists operator looks for a record that matches the criteria you give it. If it finds a record, it returns true, if not it returns false. So, when you say:
exists (select 1 from ap_invoice_lines_all
        where invoice_id = i.invoice_id and
              po_header_id is null)It is really asking is there a record in ap_invoice_lines_all where invoice_id = 100 and po_header_id is null. Since there is such a record, the exists return true and the record from ap_invoices_all is returned.
I'm not sure whether your last query should be against ap_invoices_all or ap_invoice_lines_all, and i'm also not entirely sure what result you actually want. If you want to find records in ap_invoices_all where all of the lines have a non-null po_header_id, then you need to reverse your logic, something like:
select *
from ap_invoices_all i
where invoice_num = '1010' and
      not exists (select 1
                  from ap_invoice_lines_all
                  where invoice_id = i.invoice_id and
                        po_header_id is null)That will show only invoices where all of the lines have po_header_id populated. Just change the is null to is not null to get invoices where no lines have po_header_id populated.
If you are looking for something else, try again to explain what you want, with some sample data for the two tables, and your expected results from that sample data. The sample data should preferabble be in the form of create table ind insert statements.
John

Credit Memo from Retro Billing

Hello Gurus!!
Can anyone please help me
Scenario:
I have created a credit memo from retro-billing due to price drop, and released the credit memo to accounting.
Problem:
When we look at the accounting document of the credit memo it doesn't have a controlling document and profitability analysis.
I have simulated the document at KE4ST, and here is the error message I got
Document is not profit-related and thus could not be transferred
Message no. KF755
Diagnosis
Sales document was not transferred to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) because it is not relevant for the analyses in CO-PA. This can be due to one of the following reasons (among others):
The document type is not profit-related, such as an inquiry
The sales document shows zero for the quantity
The sales document has been denied
The sales document is locked due to credit reasons
Please anyone give me an idea on how can I resolve this..
Thank You!!!!

Hi Carla,
I saw your the issue you posted on SDN.
We are facing exactly the same problem. We could not see the solution how you resolved this problem.
Can you tell us how have you resolved this ??
Would be great help to us.
Thanks,
Apte C.M.

Capture and post in single transaction J1IEX

Hello
Business requirement is that:
Business do not want to give any excise related activity to stores persons. So i,e the reason they will do the GR with Ref to Purchase order with Option "NO excise entry" in MIGO.
Now they want to make the Capture and Post in single transaction through J1IEX. If we select J1IEX with ref to GR then system will generates the Internal number, but it will not update J_1IPART1 and J_1IPARt2.
How to Capture and post in single step?m means how to update J_1IPART1 and J_1IPART2
Regards
sapman man

HI,
Remove the authorization of J1IEX transaction from the Stores Id.
SPRO--> Logistic general --> tax on goods and movement --> india -->basic settings --> maintain excise group.
Select the appropriate excise group in combination of your plant.
Click on the details (ctrl +Shift + F2), In the MIGO Setting Block, there are options like EI Capture, Post EI in MIGO.
untick this option and save it.
After that you will not get excise option in MIGO Screen and you can have your control as per below mentioned steps.
1. CVD (commercial invoice) Booking is done by finance.
2. GRN Booking -- Stores Incharge
Select the option 'No excise entry' while making GRN or disable this functionality from SPRO.
3. Capture the excise invoice using J1IEX -- Done by Finance
4. Post the Excise Invoice using J1IEX -- Done by finance.
regards,
S Anand

Execute SAP transaction from Outlook

Hi,
I want to know whether it is possible to open SAP transaction from out look or not. My scenario is when work item triggers from WF to Outlook, which carry a link to open SAP transaction directly from outlook. If it is possibli plz explain me in detail, what are the steps involved, if not what are the alternative solutions. We are working ECC5.0

Hi Shambu,
First, please remove your e-mail from your post as this is not according to forum guidelines.
It is possible to send a link to a transaction to outlook. It is similar to the executable attachments the extended notification and RSWUWFML2 create. You could check how they do it and reverse engineer for the transaction. But all the users need a SAPGui locally installed. This maybe a problem as the MAPI is used.
FYI the MAPI is no longer supported by SAP, it is not supported since release 4.7 I think. It has been replaced by RSWUWFML(2) which is being replaced by the extended notifications. I think there has been an article about it recently here on SDN.
Regards,
Martin

Post to AP transaction from SD billing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for