Privacy Statement in NW 04s

Hi,
I read documentation regarding creation of <b>Privacy statements</b> in the self registration screen.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/44/0761cea5c610b3e10000000a11466f/content.htm
But the documentation doesn't speak how to actually create it in the webserver. Has anybody implemented it in the registration screen.
Please share with me...
Thanks & Regards,
Ganesh N

hi,
From the documentation i can understand that the link for the privacy statement has to be made in the configtool under the property ume.admin.self.
privacystatement.link. But where does the content for the link has to be created? It has been said in the documentation that the application lies in the webserver. How to go about creating the content for the privacy statement?
Please share with me....
Regards,
Ganesh N

Similar Messages

How to change the privacy statement link url

I looked into the previous threads , could not find the answer to "Changing the privacy statement url to clients privacy statement url".
I am talking about the privacy statement URL in the page that user see it as soon as user logs into the e-business suite.
I have read the previous theads and developers guide regading how to show or hide this autofooter thing. but could not find any thing about how to change the one in the login page.I even looked ino personalization but could not find a place to change this url. please HELP.
Another question is " is it ok to show privacy statement in just the first page and hide it in rest of the application pages?"
Thanks
karan

Extract from Personalization Guide - Page Footer - Personalization Considerations
* If you wish to personalize the URL that points to the Privacy Statement for a page that displays a standard Copyright and Privacy (that is, its Auto Footer property is set to true), set the Scope to OA Footer, in the Choose Personalization Context page of the Personalization UI.
* If you wish to personalize the URL that points to the Privacy Statement for a page that displays a custom Copyright and Privacy (that is, its Auto Footer property is set to false), set the Scope to Page in the Choose Personalization Context page of the Personalization UI. In the following Page Hierarchy Personalization page , identify and personalize the Privacy page element.

How can I add a privacy statement to my outgoing emails, below my signature?

I'm a therapist and need to have a privacy statement/disclaimer below my signature on my outgoing emails...something like the following:
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVILEGE
The contents of this e-mail (including its attachments) are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. Any other distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. Email is not a secure medium of communication and should not be used for transmitting private and confidential information.
How do I add this?? thanks, Karen

You can set up multiple signatures and select the appropriate one. Or use stationery where the signature and disclaimer are part of the template document. Or use a text clippings tool to insert ready-to-go frequently used snippets such as your disclaimer text. Many users make use of such a tool in lieu of a prepared signature.

How to remove "About this Page" and "Privacy Statement" on a OA page

Hi,
How do i remove "About this Page" and "Privacy Statement" links at the bottom of an OA page and add "Close Window" link on the top right corner of OA page.
Please help.
Advance thank
Pavan

Hi,
1. Select Personalize Page link at top right of page.
2. Select Choose context button.
3. In the scope drop down box select OA Footer.
4. Click on apply.
5. Expand privacy.
6. Click on personalize pencil icon.
7. Set Rendered property to false at required level.
8. Click on apply.
9. Click on Return to Application link.
thanx
Pratap

Data privacy statement in ROS

Hi all,
Kindly let me know how to add Data Privacy Statement to ROS_SELF_REG BSP page.
Regards,
Nikhil
Edited by: Pbponikhil on Dec 7, 2010 7:01 AM

Hello Maija,
the solution for your requirement is depending on the UI technology you are using.
If you are using the web dynpro user interface there is the standard function to define the link to the data privacy statement langage dependent. You find this setting in IMG under SAP E-Recruiting -> Technical Settings -> User Interfaces -> Settings for User Interfaces with Web Dynpro ABAP -> Backend Candidate -> Store URLs for Language-Dependent Data Privacy Statements.
If you are still using the BSP UI there is no standard way to link different documents for different languages. If you are allowed to modify or enhance the system, I'd personally go for modifying or overriding method get_priv_ext of class CL_HRRCF_T77RCF_UI_PARAM. This method returns the link from the bsp customizing described in the postes above and is not language dependent. I'd just change the ui_param_type by prefixing Z plus concatenating the curent system language e.g. PRIV_EXT -> ZPRIV_EXT_E for english. If you add the possible paramtypes for all langages you have to table T77RCF_UI_PARTYP you can customize the different links for the different languages in the standard customizing table T77RCF_UI_PARAM. If you cannot or do not want to do a modification you could still get this solved by using some customer development. Noone said you have to link the document directly. You could link a customer bsp application which keeps the current logon language. In the application you could refer to different documents.
Best Regards
Roman

Data privacy statement in E- Recruiting

Hi
In the registration page for candidates HRRCF_CAND_REG
There is a check box for data privacy statement and there is a link to that statement. The link is connected to www.sap.com . I would like to change it or to a PDF statement or to another web site.
Is it possible? How?
Thanks,
Sharona

Hello Maija,
the solution for your requirement is depending on the UI technology you are using.
If you are using the web dynpro user interface there is the standard function to define the link to the data privacy statement langage dependent. You find this setting in IMG under SAP E-Recruiting -> Technical Settings -> User Interfaces -> Settings for User Interfaces with Web Dynpro ABAP -> Backend Candidate -> Store URLs for Language-Dependent Data Privacy Statements.
If you are still using the BSP UI there is no standard way to link different documents for different languages. If you are allowed to modify or enhance the system, I'd personally go for modifying or overriding method get_priv_ext of class CL_HRRCF_T77RCF_UI_PARAM. This method returns the link from the bsp customizing described in the postes above and is not language dependent. I'd just change the ui_param_type by prefixing Z plus concatenating the curent system language e.g. PRIV_EXT -> ZPRIV_EXT_E for english. If you add the possible paramtypes for all langages you have to table T77RCF_UI_PARTYP you can customize the different links for the different languages in the standard customizing table T77RCF_UI_PARAM. If you cannot or do not want to do a modification you could still get this solved by using some customer development. Noone said you have to link the document directly. You could link a customer bsp application which keeps the current logon language. In the application you could refer to different documents.
Best Regards
Roman

Privacy statement doesn't load on iPad

We just purchased an ipad 2 and can connect to itunes, but before purchasing any apps, we have to agree with the privacy statement, which won't finish loading....just keeps spinning and spinning. How do we solve this? Thanks

Not only do I have the same issue (on my iPad mini) but I also have some questions for Apple:
1) iCloud backup is supposed to be the SOLUTION, not the PROBLEM, to losing data. If you want to tinker with the backups when I'm not working that's fine, but I'm entrusting my life's work to iCloud for safekeeping, so why do you reward me by making it impossible to access the LOCAL file on my iPad?
2) If we can't rely on iCloud to give us our work when we need it, then how do you suggest we back it up for that important lecture or presentation, when not having access to the file (that lives on our device!) can mean losing a client, or being embarrassed in front of an auditorium because you can't open the Slides?
3) Since I'm PAYING you money each year to store my backups, how do I apply for a refund for not honoring your part of the agreement, and how about some compensation for the loss of productivity and business?
and by the way...
4) How do you defend the slowness of your iWork apps? Switching back to Keynote or Numbers from another app can take a good 15 seconds, while I tap helplessly on a frozen screen while everyone else in the room (including myself) realizes I'm an idiot for thinking I could ditch my laptop for an iPad.
I know that Apple won't read this, at least not on this forum, but others will.

Spotlight Privacy State on Snow Leopard and Leopard dual boot system

I have leopard 10.5.8 running on the internal HD of my iMac, and decided to start fresh with a clean install of Snow Leopard (now 10.6.1) on a firewire drive. The game plan is to slowly add my apps as they are updated and compatability issues are ironed out, and use Super Duper to clone the SL system over to my internal once it's where I want it to be.
The issue I'm having is when I boot between the systems, whatever Spotlight privacy settings I have set on one system is transferred over to the other upon booting into it. For example, I have the SL disk in the privacy list on my Leopard system, so I don't accidentally launch the Snowy versions of Disk Utility and whatnot when using spotlight. When I boot into SL, it remains on the exclude list, so all my spotlight hits are from the Leopard system. I redo my privacy settings on SL to include the SL disk and exclude the leopard and the system re-indexes itself.
But the next time I boot into Leopard, the changes I made while in SL are carried over, and my Leopard Disk now appears in the privacy settings and SL isn't. I redo the privacy settings, wait while it reindexes, and this vicious circle continues every time I boot between systems.
Isn't the spotlight privacy settings supposed to be written to each system's disk? I tried using the app spotless, but same deal..whatever disks I include or exclude from being indexed on one system are automatically written to the other system as well.
Any ideas? Is this a bug, or how it's supposed to work? Thanks in Advance

The privacy settings for a drive are stored on the drive itself in the /.Spotlight-V100/Store-V1/VolumeConfig.plist file.
This is drive specific so if you move a drive between systems, the privacy settings are maintained. There is no practical way to solve the problem unfortunately.
You do not however, have to worry about launching Snow Leopard apps on your Leopard system. You won't be able to, receiving an error similar to "not designed for this architecture".
As an alternative, have a look at BlackTree's Quicksilver application. You could use it instead of Spotlight on one or both of your systems.

How to add a privacy page and exclude it from the main menu, but include in links at the base

adding a privacy statement page and excluding it from the main menu, but including in links at the base of site

Right click on the page in Plan view and choose to exclude from menus. This will take it off your main nav.
For your bottom nav, change the menu to manual and add the privacy page manually.

Microsoft Word 2007 states "Microsoft Office Word Has Stopped Working"

Microsoft Word 2007 states "Microsoft Office Word Has Stopped Working" after I close any word document, (newly created or old word documents). Functionality of Word appears to be fine, I'm just tired of it crashing everytime I close it. Please HELP!
I am using Windows Vista, Service Pack 2 and Microsoft office 2007. The funny thing is, that when you are logged in to the other profile that we have created on our computer, Microsoft Word seems to work perfectly fine. The followiing is the exact "problem
signature":
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: WINWORD.EXE
Application Version: 12.0.6541.5000
Application Timestamp: 4c38f4a9
Fault Module Name: StackHash_7ea6
Fault Module Version: 6.0.6002.18005
Fault Module Timestamp: 49e03821
Exception Code: c0000374
Exception Offset: 000afaf8
OS Version: 6.0.6002.2.2.0.768.3
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 7ea6
Additional Information 2: ac730771d80f73e85b4b32dbb839afea
Additional Information 3: dd03
Additional Information 4: 741335d7d979867fc01d44e6acd4ebee
Read our privacy statement:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?link...3&clcid=0x0409
If you can explain the solution in the most simple terms possible, it would help a lot. Thank you in advance.
--Ty

Hi,
This issue may occur due to conflict with certain software\driver such as PDF add-ons or default printer software.
To resolve your issue, you can follow the methods below to delete the corresponding registry:
1. Click Start , type regedit in the Start Search box, and then press ENTER.
2. If you are prompted for an administrator password or for a confirmation, type the password, or click Continue.
3. Locate and then click the following registry subkey:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\12.0\Word\Data
4. On the Edit menu, click Delete, and then click Yes.
5. Exit Registry Editor.
6. Restart Word
Hope it helps.
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. ”

MAC and IP should specifically be listed "Personal Information" for all interactions in your Privacy Policy

Except for those who run cute lil' programs that could disorient or disrupt the system, possessing someone's MAC is possessing the 'true name' of at least one portion of their computer. Follow the computer in your accumulated files, and somewhere, this note even, gives you the mailing address, and a good lead on who owner is. IP address, if too static, well, same deal. With policy in place, I can feel free to run a server AND the rest of my system on the same fiber broadband line, saving me enough $/yr to buy an upgrade or two.
Let's face it, YOU are your equipment, and if I wanted to use my name, I would.

First, if you keep up a file until you can match a firewall MAC with doc with a name on it, the rest is fairly simple. Traceroute the IP, and, while NOT as easy as a return address sticker, it is a pretty easy thing to do. Mozilla admits this:
Any information that can connect even a firewall with a place or individual(s)should be defined strictly as "personal information in a privacy policy, period.
I worry about the Eternal Word, especially the records kept by suppliers of everything, including Mozilla, which, without paperwork like a subpoena or warrant,
"may share potentially-personally identifying information with its employees, contractors, service providers, and subsidiaries and related organizations. ..." Otherwise, Mozilla will not publicly release potentially-personally identifying information except under the same circumstances as Mozilla releases personally identifying information. Those circumstances are explained below, the Four Reasons Mozilla may release to companies including Google's Doubleclick Division, which crows, in privacy statements about a)getting access to all of Google's raw data, b) crunching and mashing for best web ad placement - NOT for "people like YOU" but Only for YOU the wife of Bradbury's Fireman is told, as she awaits a once-in-lifetime chance to influence the flow of a 3V soap opera..
Here's one Mozilla protection against releasing information to the PUBLIC, private industry and the governments of the world:
First, in admitting what you said above is not the case:,
"... Mozilla also collects potentially-personally identifying information like Internet Protocol (IP) addresses, which are non-personally identifying in and of themselves but could be used in conjunction with other information to personally identify users"
What does it do with these records, which I would prefer have every identification mark removed the microsecond it arrives?
Well, if you are not in business with Mozilla, just another user:
"1. Mozilla does not publicly release information gathered in connection with commercial transactions (i.e., transactions involving money), including transactions conducted through the Mozilla Foundation Store or donations to the Mozilla Foundation.
2. Mozilla does not publicly release personally identifying information collected in connection with an application for employment with Mozilla.
3. Mozilla does not make publicly available information that is used to authenticate users the publication of which would compromise the security of Mozilla's websites (e.g., passwords).
4. Mozilla does not make publicly available information that it specifically promises at the time of collection to maintain in confidence."
Part 1 is UNTRUE to the extent that Mozilla reports and/or verifies donations, either the 5 largest or everyone donating more than I think it's $30K for the annual Form IRS 990, a NfP's equivalent of a Form 1040 - the last three are generally posted on the foundation site.
Part 2 is The Law in most states.
Part 3 promises internal security to Mozilla, and says NOTHING about users.
Part 4 avoids nasty suits.
And the list is followed by a curious statement: "Outside those four contexts, users should assume that personally identifying information provided through Mozilla's websites will be made available to the public."
What about PRIVATE transactions (purchases, trades, 'aid in kind') - curiously missing is any statement? Or 'requests' from public and private guys in suits?
Ominously, for those who regard the rapid collection of data from social networking 'harmless' or 'fun', "Mozilla may interact with you through social networks to further our mission. When you interact with us at a third-party social network, such as Facebook, Twitter, or Google +, the network gives us the ability to access and store certain information from your profile for that social network.
Like the guy who posted a copy of an ad he found for hospital lubricant in 55-gallon drums - and found himself the Facebook spokesman for a KY-Jelly-type product.
"Consistent with our privacy commitments, we will scrutinize third party requests for information about YOU for compliance with the law, including those coming from governmental agencies or civil litigants. We may access, use, preserve or disclose information about you only WHEN WE HAVE A GOOD FAITH BELIEF that it is REASONABLY necessary to do so to satisfy the applicable law, regulation, legal process or LAWFUL GOVERNMENT REQUEST OF ANY COUNTRY, or to protect the rights, property or safety of Mozilla, its users or the public. We will provide notice of legal process or governmental requests unless prohibited to do so by law or the circumstances warrant otherwise."[emphases added, words a direct quote.] Good Faith in legality of actionswas Nixon's initial excuse too - for setting up the Plumbers unit.
I would prefer a statement like:
'Mozilla Foundation and its subdivisions are committed to neither selling, trading, supplying, borrowing or using any data that can possibly be linked to a given user or volunteer.
We will fight tooth and claw on behalf of our users and participants - to resist ANY attempt by any agency, public or private, for ANY reason, including promises of money or advertising, to divulge ANY information about them to anyone, PARTICULARLY when the request comes from a government with a less-than-stellar civil/judicial rights record, according to agencies like Human Rights Watch, the European Union's human rights division, the Permanent Court of International Justice division dealing with mass murderers and the like.
We will fight as strongly against US, State or local government agency requests for information. We will place the people we work so hard to serve above ourselves, and be dragged kicking and screaming all the way to the courthouse door, with as many live net feeds and calls to the traditional public media as possible. And we will barricade any door if we fear a midnight knock.
We will provide governments outside the countries where we do business (list here) with nothing unless ordered to by US courts, at least after fighting as many rounds of appeals as we are allowed, and will publicly and politically battle any agency which attempts to get user/participant data from us. All Foundation AND subsidiary employees earning more than $150,000 a year have pledged a minimum of 10% of their salary to these battles, if needed.
We further put agencies, public and private, on notice that we maintain as little data as possible on our free and paying customers, and do not maintain a single record we are not required to keep, even if it makes our business a bit more difficult to perform.
And if we get word someone might be coming, they're liable to find all computers free of data, which, if legally possible - before a subpoena or warrant arrives, just on rumor it is coming, we will destroy everything - to the point of installing and activating scuttling devices on all disks and backups, no matter where stored. We take this protection very seriously, and would rather face a business and directory rebuild than give any information that could locate a product user.'
I'd rather like to see a statement like this as part of the Privacy Policy of every IT-related corporation in the world - though I doubt even Mozilla has the nerve or commitment to its manifesto. We wont ever see anything like it - when asked by the local Homeland Security-style division, for info on a dozen or, for that matter, all users, it is CYA time around the world.
Smith 1 is in 1984, Smith 2 is a great San Francisco xerography artist. Smiths 3,4,5,6,7 have been spotted on the net. Use the name, it is a good name to let Big Google know how you feel.

Seeking some clarification of the default Privacy policy link

We have just got a warning from Microsoft stating an app has the following problem:
The privacy policy link did not resolve to a functional webpage..
I checked the privacy policy link and found it points to the app's store page, not privacy statement page. I guess this is a problem. Here is the strange part:
I handle privacy policy in exactly the same way for all our apps - adding a Privacy statement to the Settings pane. All apps' settings panes are handled the same way. However, this app has the extra Privacy policy link. Other apps do not. I do
not know how to get rid of it.
Out of curiosity, I started checking other apps to see if they have the same issue. To my surprise, the Weather app by Microsoft has exactly the same issue - it has a privacy statement link that works correctly, and a privacy policy link pointing to
the app's store page. The following is the screen capture of the Weather app's Settings pane:
Could anyone offer a tip on how to handle this and shed some light on why some apps have the extra Privacy policy link and others do not?
Hong

The Home button is part of the global buttons region file, located in /public_html/common/regions/menuGlobal.jspx.
This region file is included in all generated pages. The home button has the action property set to "home", so you can add a global navigation rule to the faces-config file to specify the page you want to go to:
<navigation-rule>
<from-view-id>*</from-view-id>
<navigation-case>
<from-outcome>home</from-outcome>
<to-view-id>/pages/Home.jspx</to-view-id>
</navigation-case>
<navigation-case>
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Ros_self_reg change the Data Privacy

Hi masters of SRM.
I am setting ros_self_reg transaction into displays the Data Privacy like example.
Enter your data privacy statement here.
The text may explain, for example, that consent is given to the saving and use of the entered data.
You can enter a text for this in transaction SE61. In the Implementation Guide you can then make appropriate settings so that this text is used as the data privacy statement.
Yes, I have read the data privacy statement and accept the terms.
I make new text with the clauses needed but that does not show.
2.- another question is needed an new client to setting that functionallity or in same client srm/ebp is possible.
thanks for your help.

I also did change the data privacy statement in SE61. Its not showing up in the Registration screen. how do u solve it?
do we need to publish any service in SICF?

Crystal report / adobe error

hi there,
i developed a web application using asp.net4.0, VS 2010 and crystal report for VS2010. everything working fine in development machine as well as local server machine. but the same failed in production and it gave the error message as
"the file is damaged and could not repaired" end of this error message everytime some random number is displaying.
detail error:
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name:     APPCRASH
Application Name:     AcroRd32.exe
Application Version:     10.1.1.33
Application Timestamp:     4e64e4e2
Fault Module Name:     IA32.api_unloaded
Fault Module Version:     0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp:     4e64f83d
Exception Code:     c0000005
Exception Offset:     5c662a6d
OS Version:     6.0.6002.2.2.0.305.9
Locale ID:     2057
Additional Information 1:     fd00
Additional Information 2:     ea6f5fe8924aaa756324d57f87834160
Additional Information 3:     fd00
Additional Information 4:     ea6f5fe8924aaa756324d57f87834160
Read our privacy statement:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=50163&clcid=0x0409
actually im getting this error only while passing some input data if i pass some other data then its working fine so, what i did was copied the production database,published folder from server to my local machine and ran the same code here i can see the output without any error. so, im confussing how to resove this issue and where is the issue.
experts please guide me to resolve this issue
Edited by: winseelan on Nov 22, 2011 6:25 AM

Check DLL differences; CR dlls, db client dlls, system dlls. Use [Modules|https://smpdl.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/012002523100006252802008E/modules.zip] to compare the two scenarios.
- Ludek

Mozalloc.dll A firefox plug in container has stopped working. I can't get firefox to work for more than 2 mins. before crashing. How do I make this stop?

AdapterDeviceID: 0x9712
AdapterDriverVersion: 8.861.1.2000
AdapterSubsysID: 164c103c
AdapterVendorID: 0x1002
Add-ons: %7B972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd%7D:33.1.1
AvailablePageFile: 13967405056
AvailablePhysicalMemory: 6222434304
AvailableVirtualMemory: 3783245824
BIOS_Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard
BlockedDllList:
BreakpadReserveAddress: 46661632
BreakpadReserveSize: 41943040
BuildID: 20141113143407
CrashTime: 1417153956
EMCheckCompatibility: true
EventLoopNestingLevel: 1
FramePoisonBase: 00000000f0de0000
FramePoisonSize: 65536
InstallTime: 1416895140
Notes: AdapterVendorID: 0x1002, AdapterDeviceID: 0x9712, AdapterSubsysID: 164c103c, AdapterDriverVersion: 8.861.1.2000
D2D? D2D+ DWrite? DWrite+ D3D11 Layers? D3D11 Layers+
ProductID: {ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}
ProductName: Firefox
ReleaseChannel: release
SecondsSinceLastCrash: 175
StartupTime: 1417153798
SystemMemoryUsePercentage: 25
Theme: classic/1.0
Throttleable: 1
TotalPageFile: 16630353920
TotalPhysicalMemory: 8316153856
TotalVirtualMemory: 4294836224
URL: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/new/desktop/fix-problems/form?search=mozalloc.dll&step=aaq-question
Vendor: Mozilla
Version: 33.1.1
Winsock_LSP: MSAFD Tcpip [TCP/IP] : 2 : 1 : %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll
MSAFD Tcpip [UDP/IP] : 2 : 2 :
MSAFD Tcpip [RAW/IP] : 2 : 3 : %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll
MSAFD Tcpip [TCP/IPv6] : 2 : 1 :
MSAFD Tcpip [UDP/IPv6] : 2 : 2 : %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll
MSAFD Tcpip [RAW/IPv6] : 2 : 3 :
RSVP TCPv6 Service Provider : 2 : 1 : %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll
RSVP TCP Service Provider : 2 : 1 :
RSVP UDPv6 Service Provider : 2 : 2 : %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll
RSVP UDP Service Provider : 2 : 2 :
useragent_locale: en-US
This report also contains technical information about the state of the application when it crashed.
AND:
A plugin container for firefox has stopped working.
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: plugin-container.exe
Application Version: 33.1.1.5430
Application Timestamp: 54656826
Fault Module Name: mozalloc.dll
Fault Module Version: 33.1.1.5430
Fault Module Timestamp: 54654321
Exception Code: 80000003
Exception Offset: 00001425
OS Version: 6.1.7600.2.0.0.256.1
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 0a9e
Additional Information 2: 0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
Additional Information 3: 0a9e
Additional Information 4: 0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
Read our privacy statement online:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=104288&clcid=0x0409

Try creating a new Profile by following the steps from [[Managing Profiles]] [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] and also [[The Adobe Flash plugin has crashed]]

Privacy Statement in NW 04s

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for