Problem in exact search option

hi all,
We have created an index with fuzziness = 0.7.
There is only one document in the datasource which contains the word
CHEMICAL.
Now when I am searching for "Chemica" and selecting the search method as 'exact' the result is containing one entry "CHEMICAL" which we expect should not come as there is no exact word "CHEMICA" in the document.
And when we build two indexes with fuzziness 1 & 0.7 respectively and searching for 'exact' on both the indexes ,the result  is returing the same "chemical" entry when searched for "chemica".
Now, if we search the same in the index with fuzziness = 1 then we get the result expected that no document found.It means the exact search works for this index.
Can we not search for the exact word when the index is built with fuzziness < 1 or when we are using two or more indexes with one fuzinness=1 and other less than 1 ?
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.
regards,
Yogesh

Hello,
because of performance reasons, also for more than one index only one search call is send to the Trex server. Therefore always the lowest fuzziness is used for all indexes. That means you cannot search on one index with fuzziness 1 and on another with a lower fuzziness.
Regards,
Achim

Similar Messages

  • "Exact Search" problems (still)

    Saw a post about a month ago indicating that "Exact Search" returns non-revelant items.
    It still has a problem.
    When searching for (example) "scripting additions", hits include anything with only the word scripting,
    anything with only the word additions,
    anything with the words scripting additions,
    and anything that has (double quotes)scripting, or
    additions(double quotes).
    And here's another "hit"
    !!! I know that's a trite word to use but I can't contain my excitement. I did a Google search for "invisible" and "AppleScript" and after going through 10 pages of links, I concluded that it couldn't ...
    Hardly a hit...
    Bob
    IMac G5, Powerbook G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9) 1.25Gb Ram, 250Gb Hd and 60Gb Hd, BT, AE, and a partridge in a pear tree...

    Hi Tom,
    Veeerrry Interesting (as Artie Johnson used to say)...
    This morning as I am attempting to give you an example, I find that the search seems to be functioning as it should... Could I have been tired last night? (I was, but not that tired!)
    All the exact searches returned info that I would have expected...although I do see that information not relevant to the search is sometimes highlighted in yellow in the initial search result window (quotes, or single words of the phrase being searched for):
    Searching for "Applescript Folder", one of the hits was:
    RE: One touch Internet connecting
    Posted on: Nov 1, 2005 9:10 PM, by user: Niel -- Relevance: 41%
    your /Applications/AppleScript folder, and paste the following into the window: tell application "Internet Connect" connect as user "username" to telephone number "phone number" with password "password"
    Every double quote in the above hit is highlighted. If the actual word "Applescript Folder" had not been in the first two lines of the hit, it would make this hit look bogus (only quotes found)...
    Bob...
    http://discussions.apple.com/search.jspa?threadID=&q=%22applescript+folder%22&ob jID=&dateRange=last90days&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001

  • Why is there no "SEARCH OPTION" in the Windows Store? Apps missing be nice if I could find them !

    Since on this journey from Win 8 consumer preview to Win 8 retail preview   ..And no currently trying out Win 8 Pro...It verified if it was gonna give me back ( allowed to re-download ) the apps I was used/had in previous editions. The Store gives you
    a selection of YOU APPS from previous versions of the OS preview of apps you installed and currently would want to reinstall. Various versions of the Consumer preview I installed 2 out the 4 times i installed the OS seen I had installed the app Comixology.
    When the first time I installed Retail preview it didn't have it in my list nor was it listed in the store!  Same goes with Iheart Radio and Slacker Radio though numerous installments of the OS. Now trying out the Win 8 Pro 9200 version It showed I at
    one point no matter what PC I used ( I own a few and bought a new one recently ) It showed at one point I installed Comixology. Yet it didn't show Iheart Radio or Slacker in my install list of old to reinstall nor was it even in the Store!!!!   \\\So
    what the hell gives ?????   I mean If there was a SEARCH Option it would make it easier to track these Metro ( whatever they are calling it now -personally I think they should call it FRAMES as in Window Frames  :P  When you go on these
    programs sites they only offer up Apple or Android app downloads and nothing mentioning of Metro or Win 8 -which is understandable due to not being released yet but still if the Store can't comply with your history of app install base ( paid or free ) and
    you can't have the ability to retrieves said apps you once installed how can that be trusted if and when paid apps are bought if you are only to reinstall the entire OS and find that your app is not obtainable via offered through the main store or even in
    your downloads app install history. I hope they fix this issue as it's been pissing me off since this whole testing thing!!  

    Sorry if I offended you by using an anecdote - the actions of kids are simply an easy way to explore the actions of adults.  Growing up doesn't change base instincts.  Most people (myself included) tend to have an immediate distrust of change when
    it is not change that they are instigating, when it is forced upon them.  What better example is there than a child, where many big decisions are made for them?
    As for the new interface, I didn't catch on until it was revealed to me (or I hit my head against the wall, can't remember), so I'm not saying it is easy.  Better education is needed, but going back to the old way doesn't help.  The five or six
    questions I have answered today are questions that I myself had, and wished someone had answered for me.  This is a
    drastic change from old versions of Windows.  I even told my boss yesterday that I can't see his company (I'm a contractor) switching any time soon - too much new stuff to learn.  That being said, once there are some good training tools available,
    I do believe that this OS will be a good choice - it does feel more intuitive after only a few days of use.  A training course is likely necessary for new users, however my guess is that this will wind up being a beneficial change (long-run)
    for IT departments, because the system does feel more aimed towards the casual user.  No matter what program you use, the search and settings are in one easy place.
    I admittedly do not have a lot of files in my Skydrive, however the file that is there is purple, while the folders are blue.  Not sure if all files are like that, and I really do not have the time to explore those differences.  That being said,
    the number in the bottom-right seems pretty self-explanatory, the number of child elements in the container.  I barely remember the old Skydrive interface, however I do remember it felt clunky.  Whether or not the changes are a true
    improvement, it does feel more streamlined.
    Metro (or whatever it is called now) is confusing.  It is scary.  (My word, not yours, nor am I trying to imply it.)  It is definitely
    different from the past.  But it makes sense.  Same interface on every MS product: Xbox, Windows, and Phone.  Microsoft didn't exactly
    pioneer this idea, either.  Apple has been creeping in that direction for a while now.  As I said previously, I can move around faster in the new Start menu than I could in the old, and I can actually do
    more without ever putting a hand on the mouse - for anyone that is waist-deep in computers, regardless of their specific job, that tends to be a
    good thing.
    There are a lot of growing pains here, for both Microsoft and the consumer.  Has MS gotten it right?  Not yet, not entirely, but the goal is clear.
    If your complaint is on broken
    functionality, then I wouldn't disagree with you.  There is plenty of that, and I think it was a bit foolish of Microsoft not to have a Connect site up for such things.  (If I'm wrong on that, and there is one, please point me that way.  I'm
    still stuck with Explorer.exe crashing from click-scrolling.)
    As for disliking the big changes, well, I can't agree with you on that at all.  Again, it wasn't an easy transition, but now that I'm here, I don't want to go back.  I want the true
    bugs fixed, but not having a search bar seems more like being stuck on old ways of doing things than a real problem.  That kind of thing can even lead to puking.

  • I am trying to remove the older version of iTunes but an error message appears saying that it cannot find the path to 'iTunes64.msi", and I tried the search option to find it on my computer but no such luck. Please help me

    I am trying to remove the older version of iTunes but an error message appears saying that it cannot find the path to 'iTunes64.msi", and I tried the search option to find it on my computer but no such luck. Please help me

    Go to Microsoft website to fix install and Unistall problems. Click "Run now" from Fix it to remove all iTunes &amp; related installer files:
    http://support.microsoft.com/mats/Program_Install_and_Uninstall
    Be aware that Windows Installer CleanUp Utility will not remove the actual program from your computer. However, it will remove the installation files so that you can start the installation, upgrade, or uninstall over.

  • DVR Search Option No Longer Works - After The Crap Upgrade

    The new software upgrade is crap. DVR search option no longer works. I can't use the search option to find my favorite programs and set the DVR to record them. It only lets me put the first letter in the search field and then nothing. I can't enter any more letters aftet that.
    Verizon sent me another DVR but it has same issues. They sent a technician to my house and he basically told me, the upgrade is crap and lots of people are having technical issues.
    He gave me another box and said it is working. Now I have three DVRs sitting in my house and I have to return two. After he left I tried to search and I have the same exact issue so basically he just lied and didn't fix anything.
    I called tech support over and over, and they just told me that they can't do anything. They basicaly admitted that the upgrade is crap and the are clueless on how to fix it. So I'm stock with 3 DVRs that don't work. Billing department told me they can't give me any discounts either.
    Anyone else is having these issues?

    Same issue here.  Sent me another box, same model as the old one.  Same exact issues.  Called Tech support back, they admitted it was a known issue, and nothing he could do about it.  Was told I had to talk to someone in SALES to get them to send me a newer box.
    New box is here, and now i have no option to record.  Oh, and last time I called tech support... I got 'disconnected' (after being on hold for 30+ minutes).  They are really dropping the ball, and I will not be renewing.

  • Why does search option in history doesn't work? It does not display any sites I've been to.

    I enter history, type a name of a site I've been to in 'search' or 'find' field (I'm using polish version so I don't know the exact name of that field) and it does not find anything. I haven't cleared my history, it's all there when I open 'today', 'yesterday' etc. tabs. Only finding it using search option doesn't work.
    It used to work fine now it doesn't. I haven't installed anything.

    Make sure that you're not running Firefox in Private Browsing mode.
    https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Private+Browsing
    You enter Private Browsing mode if you select:
    Tools > Options > Privacy > History: Firefox will: "Never Remember History"
    To see all History and Cookie settings, choose:
    Tools > Options > Privacy
    choose the setting Firefox will: Use custom settings for history. Deselect:
    [ ] "Permanent Private Browsing mode"

  • BUG in iOS7: Post iOS7 upgrade, search option does not work for "Messages". If you want to search a contact name in Messages who is way below the list, the search will not yield any result.

    BUG in iOS7: Post iOS7 upgrade, search option does not work for "Messages". If you want to search a contact name in Messages who is way below the list, the search will not yield any result.

    These are user forums. You are not speaking to Apple here. Report your problem at Apple Feedback.

  • Ipod 30 GB: no search option?!

    Hi all,
    now I have my own Ipod (5. generation, 30 GB). Its working fine, but there isn't any search option in the menu. I already updated my software but there is still this problem... what can I do?
    thanks for helping and sorry for my english =)

    Hey!
    You would need to buy the "late 2006" version of iPod AKA iPod with Video.This is the only way to obtain the search feature you desire.OIt is (as yet)not included in the updates provided for download by Apple.Fifth Generation iPod (Late 2006) (also known as iPod with video)
    You can distinguish the Fifth Generation iPod (Late 2006) from the original Fifth Generation iPod by the last three digits of the serial number. The Fifth Generation iPod (Late 2006) serial number's last three digits will be one of the following: V9K, V9P, V9M, V9R, V9L, V9N, V9Q, V9S, WU9, WUA, WUB, WUC, and X3N. The Fifth Generation U2 Special Edition iPod (30 GB Late 2006) serial number's last three digits are W9G.
    Cheers,
    John

  • Search option in masthead design

    Hi all.
                     How can we place the toolarea search option in masthead design so that the search option works well ? I want to place this in place of branding image.

    Hello Neil,
    I think this problem was solved in this toppic:
    /thread/81725 [original link is broken].
    Regards
    Gregor

  • Exact Search Criteria in OAF

    Hi,
    I have developed a Custom OA Page with VO having 9 Columns, all 9 columns are in search criteria having LOV for each column. It is oracle R12 environment.
    Problem:
    When i search for a specific value for column it is returning values in result region starting with that value.
    Example: when i search for a value like 1234, it is returning the values starting with 1234. Actually it is taking as 1234%, hence it is returning values like 12341,12342,12343,12344,12345. Is there any property that i need to set to get results for exact values.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Surendra N

    Thanks Sushant,
    I could able to override the executeQuery.
    I am facing another issue that is with where clause, please find the below where clause that i have used.
    setWhereClause("segment1 = nvl(:1,segment1)");
    By using this i can search exact match, but there is another requirement to search like values. I can search for a value '1234', but if i give '1234%' it is not retrieving the details.
    In where clause can i use LIKE instead of '=' sign.
    Regards,
    Surendra N

  • Problem with removing Search and Advanced Search functionalities in Portal

    Hi,
          As per our client requirement, we have removed search and advanced search functionalities in Masthead and those are working fine. But when ever we restarted the portal server, these search options are reappearing in portal.
              I am not getting why it is happening and every time we restarted the server, we are removing these search functionalities from masthead.
              If anyone knows why it is happening, kindly share with us
    Thanks & Regards
    Pavan

    Hi Santosh,
                         Problem is not solved. Where can i find the Standard tool area iview used in Default frame work page ?
    At present, we disabeled the search and it's working fine. But when we restart the portal, search is again reappearing and we need to disable that once again.
               Is there any sollution for this problem?? Kindly let me know..
    Thanks & Regards
    Pavan
    Edited by: pavanakrishna reddy on Mar 24, 2010 9:44 AM

  • Problems with the Search for room content

    Hi,
    I face a problem configuring the search for room content using KM search iView (com.sap.km.Search).
    I found the chapter Configuring the Search for Room Content in the help. So I set up the following things :
    1- I assign the room_id iView parameter to the roomid room parameter (in the template)
    2- I added room_cm_search component to the component set (I added it at the bottom of the "component for basic search function")
    3- I select the entry "Folder" as the default search scope in the search option set. I specify a root folder for search as well.
    But it doesn't work properly. It always returns "no result found". And if I add the room_cm_search component at the top of the "component for basic search function", It runs the search on all the documents of the default search scope, and not only on the room documents.
    Can you please tell me the right way to configure the search for room content using the com.sap.km.Search iView ?
    I work on EP 7.0 SP 10.
    Thanks a lot,
    Loïc LEVEUGLE

    Hi Loic,
    the Room Content Search iView is a special Search iView that is filtering for documents that were created in the Room Context (all documents get a specific metadata that is keeping the roomiD) . The easiest thing is to use the standard iView used for the delivered templates from SAP.
    I would advise to use the iView that is already preconfigured for a room template or part template and can be found and referenced in your template from the following path: Portal Content ->com.sap.ip.collaboration--> TemplateAndPartContent --> Generic -->iViews and take the iView "Search Room"
    If you reference that iView in your room template or room part template, you have to think about the correct configuration in the template configuration iView. Just take as example the configuration of the part template "SAP Search Room".
    Or even better: Copy a template (room or part) from SAP that is containing the Room Search and delete everything what you don´t need out of the template. You safe time and you can add all additional content you´ll need to your template. Some ideas can be found in the following "How to Guide":
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0496f69-cb70-2910-21a6-c4cf2cc66311
    What you have written under 3 -> would never work as the root folder for search doesn´t make any sense as the documents of a room are stored in different folders and you can´t define a root folder. Therefor you have the specific room_id parameter that is filtering what documents belong to the room.
    Good luck,
    Anja

  • Google Search Option on iweb

    Hi,
    How does one add Google search option on the iweb page?
    Has anyone used this option before? If so can you pls help.
    Regards,
    Senthil

    Get your Google Search field code and the follow the directions below for editing it into the html page of your choice!
    The general directions are as follows ...
    1. Decide where you want your search field and know exactly what dimensions you need. (you can take a screenshot (Apple-Shift-4) of the search field and then do a Get Info (Apple-i) on the resulting Picture file to see what the actual dimensions are)
    2. Insert a text box onto your page and adjust its size to exactly your dimensions.
    3. Type in some uniquely identifiable text like, "GOOGLESEARCHCODE" without changing the font or anything else...just type it in.
    4. Publish your page with iWeb.
    5. Find the html file associated with your published page (either on your iDisk or in a folder depending on how you published) and open it in any text editor (like Microsoft Word, or Textedit, or anything).
    6. Scroll through the html file and locate your placeholder text, e.g. "GOOGLESEARCHCODE".
    7. Replace the placeholder text with your Google Search html code and publish your page.
    That's it. You should see your Google Search field show up where you placed the text box.
    If any of this information is useful to you, please do me a favor and mark my reply as "solved" or "helpful" using the little buttons that you see in the title bar of this reply. I would appreciate it immensely. Thank you.

  • Webinar: Understanding TREX Indexing and Search Options

    <b>SAP NetWeaver Know-How Network Webinar: 
    Understanding TREX Indexing and Search Options
    Wednesday 25 August 2004
    11 a.m. EDT</b>
    On Wednesday 25 August, Larry Brambrut, an EP RIG Consultant, hosts the webinar titled  <b>Understanding TREX Indexing and Search Options</b> as part of the ongoing SAP NetWeaver Know-How Network Webinar Series.
    Here’s how Larry describes his webinar presentation:
    “This session will describe the enhancements to "Search and Classification"(TREX) in NetWeaver '04 and EP 6.0 SP2 Patch 6. The session will include a discussion of the CM enhancements such as new crawlers, new search UI options and plug-ins, and TREX enhancements such as the new TREX architecture, delta indexing, and new TREX Admin Tool.”
    SDN invites you to post your questions to the presenter prior to the webinar and continue the online discussion afterward.
    <b>How to Participate</b>
    (Please go to the SDN webinar schedule page to find more information)
    Dial-in Information:
    Date: Wednesday 25 August 2004
    Time: 11 a.m. EDT
    Within the U.S., call: +1.888.428.4473
    Outside the U.S., call: +1.651.291.0618
    Password: NetWeaver04
    WebEx Information:
    Topic: SAP NetWeaver Know-How Network
    Date: Wednesday 25 August 2004
    Time: 11 a.m. EDT
    Meeting Number: 742391500
    Meeting Password: netweaver04 (lowercase)
    WebEx Link: sap.webex.com
    Replay Information:
    A recorded replay of this call will be available for approximately three months after the webinar. Access this recording by dialing the appropriate number and using the replay access code 720155.
    Toll-free: +1.800.475.6701
    International: +1.320.365.3844
    <b>
    About the SAP NetWeaver Know-How Webinar Series</b>
    The SAP NetWeaver Know-How Webinar Series is driven by the SAP NetWeaver Regional Implementation Group (RIG), part of the SAP Development organization. The mission of the SAP NetWeaver RIG is to enable customers, employees, and partners to successfully implement the SAP NetWeaver solution. This SAP RIG has expertise in BI, EP, XI, and WebAS. They contribute their implementation expertise to the SDN implementation forums as well as to the SAP NetWeaver Know-How Webinar Series.
    <b>Disclaimer</b>
    SDN is not responsible for any changes to the webinar schedule. The webinar schedule may be changed or cancelled without prior notice.

    Hi there,
    I just read this thread, and maybe someone here can answer my current trex question:
    I have created an ordinary CM repository, and created an index with this repository as source. Now the problem: I would like to exclude files in the repository with specific mimetypes from the TREX indexing process.
    I have verified that the TrexValidMimetypes.ini does not contain any reference to the Mimetypes I'm creating, but never the less, the document titles are searchable and are returned when searching.
    How do I get around this issue?
    Is it possible in NW04 or EP6.0 SP3 PXXX??
    Regards,
    Hco

  • [OER 11.1.1.6.3] More Search Options feature

    Hi experts,
    IHAC who is trying to use More Search Options feature. It is able to mark the Filter by Categorizations check box that displays all the categorizations.
    The problem is that the customer is unable to mark any check box in order to select the categories for its search. It seems that check boxes are disabled.
    I have already set up the ‘Search’ settings in the System Settings page.
    I will appreciate any comments in order to help to fix the problem.
    Best regards,
    Carlos Almeida

    Lets back up and clarify terms.
    A 3 node RAC cluster has one (1) and only one (1) database. Three (3) instances but only one (1) database.
    If you are talking about something else you need to be very clear in your description.
    Assuming one database and three instances the listener and tnsnames files should be identical. And, as Oracle creates all of this during dbca installation, why is it a concern?

Maybe you are looking for