Problem in Hierarchy assignment to FM area

my client is creating FM hierarchy variant "skt1". but when want to assigne FM area to hierarchy system generate message "hierarchy variant "skt1" is incomplete with regard to fiscal year "2009"
please help in this regard

Hi ,
Kindly check the entries in view SM30 - v_FMCIVARNT .
If the entry for you varient for the year in 2009 is missing make that entry that would resolve the issue .
Regards ,
Dewang T

Similar Messages

No Hierarchy Variant assigned to FM Area Test

Hi...
I am facing problem at the time of creating Budget using T.Code: FMBB
System gives Error: "No Hierarchy Variant assigned to FM Area Test"
After that I have gone through configuration & trying to assign Hierarchy variant to FM Area,
Fiscal Year: 2010
Hierarchy Variant: THV,
then it will show message that - Here You are only allowed to enter Fiscal Year "0000".
After that I changed fiscal year 0000 & trying to assign hierarchy variant,
then it shows message that 'Hierarchy variant THV is incomplete with regard to fiscal year 0000".
Now I am unable to post budget initial Entry.
Kindly suggest the possible solutions for this.
Regards
Moonoo

Hi,
Please refer below mentioned link for Hierarchy Variants in the Fiscal Year :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/dd/a0193ca1f5e713e10000000a114084/content.htm
Regards,
Pramitha.

No hierarchy variant assigned to FM area

Hi,
I am getting the following error message while entering transactions
No hierarchy variant assigned to FM area
Message no. F6506
However following steps are completed in the system
1. Creation of Hierarchy Variant
2. Update of Hierarchy Variant in Fund Center Master
Also i am not able to save the Assignment of Hierarchy Variant to year 0000 and i get the following error message although the variant is entered in all Fund Center Master
Hierarchy variant XXX is incomplete with regard to fiscal year 0000
Message no. F6508
Please advise
Regards
Zehran

Hello Zahran,
Please check the fund center already created without Hierarchy assignment in their respective master records.
Solution: First you assign unassigned fund centers to Hierarchy and then try to pass the transactions.
Regards,
Babjee

Problems with hierarchy display when using SAPBEXonRefresh

Dear all,
I would like to create dynamic logos in BEx Analyzer. It means I need to change the logo image depending on value of certain free characteristic ("LOGO_ID").
At the moment, I have achieved that logo pictures (6 in total) are swapped by adding VBA code to SAPBEXonRefresh.
Unfortunately hierarchy symbols become to act very strange. Basically there are two problems:
1. They are not refreshed after hierarchy compression; those hierarchy symbols which are outside of result area are not removed
2. Pressing symbols in order to expand/collapse hierarchy sometimes does not produce any effect.
Code is show bellow and here is brief explanation of it. First, we are searching for "LOGO_ID" string in document. One cell to the right is value which tells us what logo to make visible. There are six logo pictures in worksheet with names: "L1", "L2", "L3", "L4", "L5", "L6" and only one should be visible.
Problem seems to be in working with Shapes (logo pictures are Shapes) since hierarchy expand/collapse symbols are also of the same type.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
Sub SAPBEXonRefresh(queryID As String, resultArea As Range)
Call ShowLogo
End Sub
Sub ShowLogo1()
   Dim UniLogo As String
   Dim UniRange As Range
   Dim vaUnis As Variant
    If WorksheetFunction.CountIf(Cells, "LOGO_ID") = 0 Then
       Exit Sub
    End If
    Set UniRange = Cells.Find(What:="ID izvornog sustava", After:=[A1], LookIn:=xlFormulas, _
        LookAt:=xlPart, SearchOrder:=xlByColumns, _
        SearchDirection:=xlNext, MatchCase:=False)
    UniLogo = UniRange.Offset(0, 1).Value
    If UniLogo <> "" Then
       If ActiveSheet.Shapes(UniLogo).Visible = msoTrue Then
         Exit Sub
       End If
    End If
    vaUnis = VBA.Array("L1", "L2", "L3", "L4", "L5", "L6", )
    For i = 0 To 5
        ActiveSheet.Shapes(vaUnis(i)).Visible = msoFalse
    Next i
    If UniLogo <> "" Then
      ActiveSheet.Shapes(UniLogo).Visible = msoTrue
    End If
Kind regards, Josko.

Hi Josko,
Where do you have this problem 3.5 or 7.0 BexAnalyzer.
When ever heirarchy icons are created in BEx, respective hyperlink is assigned to each of them, Make sure that you dont manipulate with them,,
If you still have problem then create OSS message.
Regards,
Vinay

Data slice inconsistency problem with hierarchy nodes

Hi Experts,
We want to lock planning tables from function. We create the appropriate data slices but there are problems with (material group) hierarchy nodes.
If I give the node as input variable to the function it causes inconsistency in the data slice. If I choose and add this node to the lock in modeler, the problem is the same.
We are using the following variables to create a data slice:
0VERSION
0VTYTYPE
0COMP_CODE
ZGRMAT (developed material group)
Z_YEARCR (developed yera created)
The problem also exist if I set an another type of node e.g. destination country (0RECIPCNTRY) instead of material group.
For me, the problem seems to be generic.
Do you have any idea?
Many thanks in advance
Peter

There is a note related to this proble:
Note 1070608 - Lowflag field is not valid
The implementation of this note resolves the problem.
Peter

Hi, I have small problem, for some time in music area I had two folders to use 1. Apple loops for soundtrack pro 2. Final Cut pro sound effects now both are gray and with out content may I know what happend

Hi, I have small problem, for some time in music area I had two folders to use 1. Apple loops for soundtrack pro 2. Final Cut pro sound effects now both are gray and with out content may I know what happend

I just went through this and it appears that my Focusrite Saffire was the culprit. I connected all the outputs on the focusrite according to the way the jacsk on the back were labeled and then set up the multichannel speaker setup to match. Then I went into STP, created a pink noise clip and panned it around, the LFE, center and rears were not in the right place.
I reconnected the hardware to match the 5.1 pan pot in STP then changed the multichannel speaker setup to match. Everything appears to be correct now but I would have loved to have been able to just assigned the output busses to correct outputs in the saffire.
Next step is to pan that pink noise around with my SPL meter to calibrate the room.

Problem during hierarchy load from ECC 6.0 to BW

Hello,
I encountered a problem during hierarchy loads from ECC to BW:
I get the following in BW:
Error when updating Idocs in Source System
Diagnosis
Errors have been reported in Source System during IDoc update:
Once I go into ERP and look at the IDocs I get the following message:
Idoc Error 26:
EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)
Message no. E0078
Diagnosis
The segment E1RSSH does not occur at the current level of the basic type (extension ).
This error can have several reasons:
The segment E1RSSH is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.
The segment E1RSSH does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type (extension ).
The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.
Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.
Procedure
Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type (extension ).
Can anyone help?

The most basic setting in a BW system is its connectivity with the R/3 system (which is a basis team activity, but BI consultant can always help).
Issue: While creating source system, I am getting an error "Segment E1RSSH does not exist".
Diagnosis
Segment E1RSSH is in the syntax description, but it does not exist.
The issue was that some of the entries in the table EDISEGMENT were missing.
As this a standard table, it is recommended to restore the table from Backup or from another BI system. (Please ask your basis team to do it.)
Now, the significance of the segments: We all know that we require 3 message types in total to communicate with R/3 system. RSRQST, RSSEND and RSINFO.
Now each of the message types has some segments which help in communication.
You can see this segment types in the t-code we30. Just enter the basic idoc type and click on display.
This error is not a common error, but can be useful if at any stage of implementation or support, the table gets disturbed and you have issues with source system connectivity.
Thanks
SM

Problem during number assignment cause record in iw51

Hi,
I am getting this error message in my BAPI(BAPI_SERVNOT_CREATE).Kindly suggest me what am I supposed to do.
I am getting the error message while assigning the cause code "Problem during number assignment cause record "
Please have a look at my code link.
http://selectoptions.blogspot.in/2012/03/report-zbapiservnot.html#!http://selectoptions.blogspot.com/2012/03/report-zbapiservnot.html
Edited by: dhinesh on Mar 8, 2012 5:05 AM
Edited by: dhinesh on Mar 8, 2012 5:08 AM

Hi
The problem seems to be with the number range given for the document type you are using for posting the rentals. When you simulate it, no posting happens that is why the problems does not come fore. But when the tick is removed, the system is trying to post the document and at the same time, since the number range of internal type, the number you are giving (hope you might be giving some number for your document or something like that..I am not sure about your module), the system throws the error. Please check your entry.

Various FM areas are assigned to controlling area

Dear Sir,
While uploading budget throufh KP06 the error is coming :
Various FM areas are assigned to controlling area 6000
     Message no. F6097
Kindly suggest
Regards
Raj

Hello Raj,
There are many different reasons/options:
1) If you are on EA-PS package 200 you can try note 723605 to avoid the error message.
2) If you are not on EA-PS 200 (application release 4.7) the reason of the message F6097 is the following:
If for example Fund was activated in Customizing of Public Sector Management, it is not possible to assigned an company code to an controlling area, that is not FM relevant.
Please check if it is one assignment available. It can be field fund or the others available in the following SPRO settings:
SPRO -> Public Sector Management -> General Settings for Public Sector Management -> Basic Settings: Account Assignment Elements -> Activate Account Assignment Elements
Please check if you have activated Fund or Functional Area or Grant or Funded Program there.
How could you solve this problem: Please deactivate the fund (or the one that was active) temporary. Then assign FM area to Controlling Area. Then activate the fund again.
3) Please notice, the standard is the following:
COarea CCCC
       > CompCode 0001     > FMarea FFFF
       > CompCode 0002     > FMarea FFFF
       > CompCode NNNN     > FMarea FFFF
All CompCodes, assigned to the same CO area have to be assigned the same FMarea. This is not so in your case. Because different local currencies in the assigned CompCodes you assigned FM areas with
corresponding currencies. Result: The assignment COarea < > FMarea (via the CompCodes) is not ambiguity. This is what the error message of KP06 is saying (note 908908).
If you want change the currency settings in CompCodes to assign only one FMarea to all CompCodes maybe you have to covert the existing transaction data, too (see notes 89531 and 39919).
But I found a modification note 779180 it meets your assignments.
Please check that. Maybe it have to be extend that KP06 will work also then. I'm not sure if it will also work if you assign these CompCodes to the same COarea.
4) The relation between FM-area and CO-area can only be 1 to n. Because there is no direct relation between FM- and CO-area, you have to check the relations between the assigned company codes to FM- and CO-area. Please read the doumentation under the path:
Public Sector Management -> Funds Management -> Master Data -> Enterprise Structure - Organizational Units -> Organizational Structures - Assignments.
I hope it helps to resolve your issue.
Kind Regards,
Vanessa.

Fix for Airport Wireless Connection Problem stating Self-Assigned IP and not wanting to connect in Lion OSX.

Fix for Airport Wireless Connection Problem stating Self-Assigned IP and not wanting to connect in Lion OSX.
Bought my girlfriend the newest Macbook Pro 13" and began experiencing problems with my wifi the moment we got home. Her Macbook would not connect to our home Wi-Fi while my old Macbook Late 2008 running Snow Leopard connected without a problem. Airport would say that it had a Self-Assigned IP address (168.x.x.x). Did not realize it was a Lion problem until after using her Macbook Pro and becoming jealous of the new OSX, I upgraded. Soon after I was unable to go online. Luckily I had my iPad 2 and I began to scoure the net for help. Ran into allot of suggestions but it was not until I tried the following all together was I able to share the good new, from my Macbook. Hope this works:
First go to Preferences > Network and click on the cog next to the + and - on the sidebar and click Set Service Order
     - Move Wi-Fi to the top and click ok.
     - Set location to Automatic
     - Click Apply
     - Click Advanced
     - Click the "-" on the selected Wi-Fi router you wish to connect to
     - Click Apply
     - Click Lock to Prevent Further Changes
Go to your Mac's harddrive, (Macintosh)
     - Go to Library > Preferences > SystemConfiguration >
     - Delete "com.apple.airport.preferences.plist" file
Turn off your computer
     - push and hold Option+Command+R+P
     - turn on computer
     - when the grey screen turns on you will hear the OS X "ON" sound (for lack of a proper term) and it will momentarily restart.
     - you will once again hear the "ON" sound, let go of all keys.
     - this resets your PRAM
Go to Preferences > Network > Advanced > + sign
     - click Choose a Network
     - Select your network and enter password
Viola!!! I tried this on my Macbook Late 2008 and my girlfriends new Macbook Pro 2010

     No you are clearly mistaken. The Self-Assigned IP address problem exists on many Macbook Pro models, including the current model, which I mentioned as being the original computer with the problem. While my 2008 Macbook is older it was working perfectly on Snow Leopard and didn't suffer issues until switching to Lion. So clearly the problem exists on the operating system and not so much the hardware.
     I called Apple Support and they had no fix for the problem and told me that this would hopefully be addressed in a subsequent update. It wasn't until I came accross the answer after trying many different methods that I got both of the Macbooks to connect to my router. Otherwise I wouldn't or could not have been surfing the internet for the last 4 months.
Cheers.

Heading level hierarchy errors when topics are in TOC more than once

I have discovered that the hierarchy in the Heading levels in
the Printed Documentation will differ from than in my online help
table of contents hierarchy, and that the problem is due to topics
that are intentionally in the TOC more than once.
For example, in chapter 5 of a particular help system the
hierarchy should be:
Heading 1 < Chapter 5 title from top-level book>
Heading 2 <title of second level book>
Heading 3 <title of topic that appears under second-level
book>*
What I actually get is:
Heading 1 < Chapter title from top-level book>
Heading 2 <title of second level book>
Heading 4 <title of topic that appears under second-level
book>*
* This same topic appeared in an earlier chapter. In that
chapter it was really at a Heading 4 level.
Due to company styles, etc. we use a numbering system at the
headings and in the TOC, so instead of
5
5.1
5.1.1
I erroneously get
5
5.1
5.1.1.1
This type of hierarchy issue appears multiple times in this
particular document (which I inherited by the way.)
Other than restructuring the document to not reuse topics in
different places in the TOC, is there a solution or a workaround
for this problem?
What I am doing so far, is generating the Print Documentation
one chapter at a time. As long as a topic is not reused with the
same chapter, my hierarchy of heading levels is maintained;
otherwise, it is not. Then I can put the chapters back together
after fixing the few places that still have heading level problems.
This however, will be quite cumbersome as this document is
translated into nine other languages.
I am using RoboHelp X5 for Word / Word 2003 for the source
and most of the translations; RoboHelp Asian Edition, Simplified
Chinese / Word 2003 for the Chinese translation. The heading level
hierarchy error occurs in both versions.

>> AF: I've commented in sections...
Without Maintain Heading Levels, RH will apply heading levels
to the books and then the topic levels will get bumped down. So a
top level book will be Heading 1 and the Headings in the topic will
get bumped down to 2, 3 and 4 etc. If then you have another book
one level down so that it gets Heading 2 applied, the same topic
but under the level two book would then get 3, 4 and 5 applied.
That is not the original problem but hopefully we are agreed
that is how things work on that.
>> Yes - that is the expected behavior. When it didn't
happen as expected, that's what led me to the discovery of the
cause of the problem (topic reuse).
Your problem was that firstly Heading 3 got bumped to Heading
4 if the same topic was inserted into the TOC twice. I assume it
was OK in the first instance, or is it that when you add it twice
it goes wrong everywhere?
>> Your assumption is correct. First occurrence is
correct. Second, third, and fourth (yes - there is one topic that
is used 4 times! ) are not correct based on TOC hierarchy.
On the numbering, nothing surprises me. If you look at my
site you will see that for RH HTML, i gave up on getting it right.
I have had many queries on this and more than a few people have
indicated they will work on the problem and get it working. I'm
still waiting. There are many posts about outline numbering
problems. Has anyone got it working satisfactorily?
>> I don't really have numbering problems. The
numbering is following the RoboHelp-generated hierarchy and the
.dot template that I apply. It's just that the RH-generated
hierarchy and its heading levels don't correspond to the "real"
hierarchy because of the reuse issue.
I have seen various Word gurus maintain that numbering has
not worked entirely satisfactorily since Word 2! Also enough posts
to convince me this is a Word issue, not a RH issue.
If you want to create a new project and knock something up
that demonstrates this problem, by all means zip it up and send it.
I'll assume it will be a small project and zip to less than 5mb. If
more, contact me first.
>> Unless you have RoboHelp X3 Asian Edition,
Simplified Chinese, there is really no need. I plan to either avoid
the reuse issue in the source, or build the print doc in sections
which is easy enough in RoboHelp X5 for the non-Chinese languages.
It is in the older Asian edition where the problems are compounded
by the omitted reuse topics. If you do have RoboHelp X3 Asian
Edition, Simplified Chinese and want to experiment, I can send you
a cut-down version of the project. Don't feel obligated though;
unless you can read Chinese (I can't) it is very tedious to work
with.

Problem with Folio Builder - added articles are "spinning"

Hello,
today we are experiencing strange problems with Folio Builder. We are adding new artcles to folio created today and all added articles have same issue - spinning wheel in folio builder. Such articles we can't see in Content viewer until we delete existing folio.
Thanks for help

Hi,
Could be that there was a network problem when uploading the InDesign documents.
Try to select the articles and delete them with the trashcan. And then reupload the documents from InDesign.
Good luck!

Canon pixma pro 9500 having problems with my print out. colors are glazed and missing colors

canon pixma pro 9500 having problems with my print out. colors are glazed and missing colors
i have prfiled the mac and printer wiht colormunki and uplodated the profile sucessfully
i set the printer to correct icc profile
print out comes out same with glazed colors and missing tones/colors
however when i use the same printer on windows and with light room, following same icc profile, colormunki calibrated profile, the print our are excellent.
i have also tried using printer manage profile using the Mac and Aperture and get same poor prints
can you please assist and thanks

I've a Pro9000 and also use Colormunki successfully.
When I use Colormunki, I calibrate both of my monitors and the printer/paper combination. Colormunki saves the generated profiles to the correct places -- I don't load or change any profiles after that as that would mess-up what the Colormunki had just done for me, and this would likely mess-up the prints.
Though I double-check the settings in the print dialogue, the choice for the printer handling things is already grayed-out. Colorsync handles it all just fine.

Why did not I got assignment of Business Area by sales Area

Hi Experts,
Can anybody please tell me,
Why did not I got assignment of Business Area by sales Area in following path.
IMG -- Enterprise Structure -- Assignment -- Sales and Distribution -- Business Area Account Assignment -- Assign Business Area by Sales Area.
Please help.

HI,
For business area assignment to Sales Area there the Steps u need to follow.
1.Define Business Area
2.Then maintain Consolidated business Area
3.Now in Assignment in Define rule by Salee Area u have to select Rule 002 which indicate
Rule 002 Business area determination from sales area Table use (TVTA)
Then u will find the data in Assign business Area by sales Area Screen & u can fill the business area there .
I hope this will help u
Regards
Deepak

Outbound error "No cross-system business area has been assigned to bu. area

Hi everyone,
i have idoc failed in outbound with error No cross-system business area has been assigned to business area 0001
Thanks in advance
Soufiene

Hi Fernando,
The issue is from HR , an entry for an employee was entered and suppose not it generated idoc failed.
Thanks
Soufiene
Edited by: Soufiene Tchantchane on Sep 7, 2011 10:32 PM

Problem in Hierarchy assignment to FM area

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for