Problem regarding Update-Statement on se11 table

Hello I tried to update a dataset in a se11 table using UPDATE Statement.
It doesn't work and I get a sy-subrc = 4.
That is my code:
TABLES ZTDM_SAPOUTPUT.
* Arbeitsbereich definieren
DATA:
wa_ZTDM_SAPOUTPUT LIKE ZTDM_SAPOUTPUT.
wa_ZTDM_SAPOUTPUT-PK = '1'.
wa_ZTDM_SAPOUTPUT-FNCODE = '3'.
wa_ZTDM_SAPOUTPUT-MATNR = '3'.
wa_ZTDM_SAPOUTPUT-MAKTX = '3'.
wa_ZTDM_SAPOUTPUT-ZEINR = '3'.
wa_ZTDM_SAPOUTPUT-MATKL = '3'.
wa_ZTDM_SAPOUTPUT-STATE = '1'.
UPDATE ZTDM_SAPOUTPUT FROM wa_ZTDM_SAPOUTPUT.
Write: 'UPDATE returned' , sy-subrc.
SKIP.
The given Dataset having PK=1 doesn't get updated.
Maybe my understanding is wrong:
Is it correct that the updated dataset ist defined by the primary key in this workingarea?
My Primary Key is PK.
Can you see the error?

UPDATE dbtab FROM wa. or
UPDATE (dbtabname) FROM wa.
Changes one single line in a database table, using a primary key to identify the line and taking the values to be changed from the specified work area, wa. The data is read out of wa from left to right, matching the line structure of the database table dbtab. The structure of wa remains unchanged. This means that wa must be at least as wide (see DATA) as the line structure of dbtab, and have the same alignment. Otherwise, a runtime error occurs.
If either the database table, dbtab, or the work area, wa, contain Strings, wa must be compatible with the line structure of dbtab.
Example
Changing the telephone number of the customer with customer number '12400177' in the current client:
DATA wa TYPE scustom.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM scustom INTO wa
WHERE id = '12400177'.
wa-telephone = '06201/44889'.
UPDATE scustom FROM wa.
When the command has been executed, the system field SY-DBCNT contains the number of updated lines (0 or 1).
Examples
Update discount for the customer with the customer number '00017777' to 3 percent (in the current client):
DATA: wa TYPE scustom.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM scustom INTO wa
WHERE id = '00017777'.
wa-discount = '003'.
UPDATE scustom FROM wa.
The Return Code is set as follows:
SY-SUBRC = 0:
The specified line has been updated.
SY-SUBRC = 4:
The system could not update any line in the table, since there is no line with the specified primary key.
rwrd if helpful
bhupal

Similar Messages

Problem in Update Statement

I got some problem in update statement.Can anybody discuss with me regarding my problem? Below is the occured problem.
//all the declaration like Connection, ResultSet are declared, setting the ODBC path and so on steps have been set up before this method. When compile it, no error, when I start to run my program, the program�s interface is shown, but the following error was appearred and data cannot be updated, can anybody tell me where is my mistake?
//ERROR:SQL Error in update statement:java.sql.SQLException [Microsoft][ODBC][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Syntax Error in UPDATE statement.
//emp_overview is the table name
// last_name, first_name, office_phone�.is the attributes of the table
//this method had declare in the interface class already
public String updateData (String idd, String ln, String fn, String op,
               String oe, String hp, String ps, String ss)
               throws java.rmi.RemoteException
     {//begin of this method
          String result ="";
          try
          Statement statement = connection.createStatement();
          String sql = "UPDATE emp_overview SET" +
          "last_name=' "+ln+
          " ', first_name=' "+fn+
          " ', office_phone=' "+op+
          " ', office_ext=' "+oe+
          " ', home_phone=' "+hp+
          " ', primary_skill=' "+ps+
          " ', secondary_skill=' "+ss+
          " ' WHERE id="+idd;
          statement.executeUpdate(sql);
          statement.close();
          catch (java.sql.SQLException e)
     System.out.println("SQL Error in update statement: "+e);
          //throw a RemoteException with the exception
          //embedded for the client to receive
     throw new java.rmi.RemoteException("Error in Updating exist row into DB", e);
          return result;
     }//end of this method

Hi Kevin,
According to the code you have posted, it looks like you are missing a space between "SET" and "last_name". I suggest you add the following line of code:
System.out.println(sql);
before the invocation of "executeUpdate()".
I also suggest you add the following line of code:
e.printStackTrace();in your "catch" block.
Hope this helps.
Good Luck,
Avi.

Update statement in Internal Table

Plz tell me the syntax and e.g. of update statement in Internal Table program
Moderator message: Welcome to SCN, please research yourself before asking basic questions.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Feb 25, 2010 12:47 PM

Hi,
Use UPDATE statement , check below description from SAP help.
UPDATE dbtab FROM TABLE itab. or UPDATE (dbtabname) FROM TABLE itab.
Effect
Mass update of several lines in a database table.Here, the primary key for identifying the lines tobe updated and the values to be changed are taken from the lines of theinternal table itab.
The system field SY-DBCNT contains the number of updated lines,i.e. the number of lines in the internal table itab which havekey values corresponding to lines in the database table.
Regards
L Appana

Problem in Update statement using Execute Immediate

Hi All,
I am facing problem in update statement.
I am creating dynamic sql and use "execute immediate" statement to execute a update statement.
But it is not updating any thing there in the table.
I have created a query like :
update_query='Update '|| Table_Name ||' t set t.process_status =''Y'' where t.tid=:A';
Execute immediate update_query using V_Id;
commit;
But it is not updating the table.
I have a question , is execute immediate only does insert and delete?
Thanks
Ashok

SQL> select * from t;
                 TID P
                 101 N
SQL> declare
2     V_Id          number := 101;
3     Table_Name    varchar2(30) := 'T';
4     update_query varchar2(1000);
5 begin
6     update_query := 'Update '|| Table_Name ||' t set t.process_status =''Y'' where t.tid=:A';
7     Execute immediate update_query using V_Id;
8     commit;
9 end;
10 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select * from t;
                 TID P
                 101 Y

Problem in UPDATE statement In Multiple Record Block

Hi Friends,
I have problem in update Statement for updating the record in multiple record data Block.
I have two data Block the master block is single Record block and the 2nd data block is Multiple Record data Block.
I am inserting the fields like category,and post_no for partiular job in single data block
Now in second Multiple Record Data Block,i am inserting the multiple record for above fileds like no. of employees work in the position
There is no problem in INSERT Statement as it is inerting all record But whenever i want to update particular Record (in Multiple Block) of employee for that category and Post_no
then its updating all the record.
my code is Bellow,
IF v_count 0 THEN
LOOP
IF :SYSTEM.last_record 'TRUE' THEN
UPDATE post_history
SET idcode = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode,
joining_post_dt = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.joining_post_dt,
leaving_post_dt = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.leaving_post_dt,
entry_gp_stage = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.entry_gp_stage
WHERE post_no = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.post_no
AND category = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.category
AND roster_no = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.roster_no;
AND idcode = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode;
IF SQL%NOTFOUND THEN
INSERT INTO post_history(post_no,roster_no,category,idcode,joining_post_dt,leaving_post_dt,entry_gp_stage)
VALUES(g_post_no, g_roster_no, g_category, :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode, :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.joining_post_dt,
:POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.leaving_post_dt,:POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.entry_gp_stage);
END IF;
next_record;
ELSIF :SYSTEM.last_record = 'TRUE' THEN
UPDATE post_history
SET idcode = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode,
joining_post_dt = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.joining_post_dt,
leaving_post_dt = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.leaving_post_dt,
entry_gp_stage = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.entry_gp_stage
WHERE post_no = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.post_no
AND category = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.category
AND roster_no = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.roster_no;
AND idcode = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode;
IF SQL%NOTFOUND THEN
INSERT INTO post_history(post_no,roster_no,category,idcode,joining_post_dt,leaving_post_dt,entry_gp_stage)
VALUES (g_post_no,g_roster_no,g_category,:POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode,
:POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.joining_post_dt,:POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.leaving_post_dt,:POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.entry_gp_stage);
END IF;
EXIT;
END IF;
END LOOP;
SET_ALERT_PROPERTY('user_alert',ALERT_MESSAGE_TEXT, 'Record Updated successfuly' );
v_button_no := SHOW_ALERT('user_alert');
FORMS_DDL('COMMIT');
CLEAR_FORM(no_validate);
Please Guide me
Thanks in advence

As you do a loop over all the records in the block, of course every record is updated.
Also, what you do is not the way is intended to be used. In general, you base a block on a table,then there is no need at all for writing INSERT's or UPDATE's. Forms also know's then, which records to be updated and which not.

Problem In Update Statement In Multiple Record Data Block

Hi Friends,
I have problem in update Statement for updating the record in multiple record data Block.
I have two data Block the master block is single Record block and the 2nd data block is Multiple Record data Block.
I am inserting the fields like category,and post_no for partiular job in single data block
Now in second Multiple Record Data Block,i am inserting the multiple record for above fileds like no. of employees work in the position
There is no problem in INSERT Statement as it is inerting all record But whenever i want to update particular Record (in Multiple Block) of employee for that category and Post_no
then its updating all the record.
my code is Bellow,
IF v_count <> 0 THEN
LOOP
IF :SYSTEM.last_record <> 'TRUE' THEN
UPDATE post_history
SET idcode = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode,
joining_post_dt = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.joining_post_dt,
leaving_post_dt = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.leaving_post_dt,
entry_gp_stage = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.entry_gp_stage
WHERE post_no = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.post_no
AND category = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.category
AND roster_no = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.roster_no;
AND idcode = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode;
IF SQL%NOTFOUND THEN
INSERT INTO post_history(post_no,roster_no,category,idcode,joining_post_dt,leaving_post_dt,entry_gp_stage)
VALUES(g_post_no, g_roster_no, g_category, :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode, :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.joining_post_dt,
:POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.leaving_post_dt,:POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.entry_gp_stage);
END IF;
next_record;
ELSIF :SYSTEM.last_record = 'TRUE' THEN
UPDATE post_history
SET idcode = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode,
joining_post_dt = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.joining_post_dt,
leaving_post_dt = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.leaving_post_dt,
entry_gp_stage = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.entry_gp_stage
WHERE post_no = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.post_no
AND category = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.category
AND roster_no = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.roster_no;
AND idcode = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode;
IF SQL%NOTFOUND THEN
INSERT INTO post_history(post_no,roster_no,category,idcode,joining_post_dt,leaving_post_dt,entry_gp_stage)
VALUES (g_post_no,g_roster_no,g_category,:POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode,
:POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.joining_post_dt,:POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.leaving_post_dt,:POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.entry_gp_stage);
END IF;
EXIT;
END IF;
END LOOP;
SET_ALERT_PROPERTY('user_alert',ALERT_MESSAGE_TEXT, 'Record Updated successfuly' );
v_button_no := SHOW_ALERT('user_alert');
FORMS_DDL('COMMIT');
CLEAR_FORM(no_validate);
Please Guide me
Thanks in advence

UPDATE post_history
SET idcode = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode,
joining_post_dt = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.joining_post_dt,
leaving_post_dt = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.leaving_post_dt,
entry_gp_stage = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.entry_gp_stage
WHERE post_no = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.post_no
AND category = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.category
AND roster_no = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.roster_no;
AND idcode = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode;
UPDATE post_history
SET idcode = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode,
joining_post_dt = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.joining_post_dt,
leaving_post_dt = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.leaving_post_dt,
entry_gp_stage = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.entry_gp_stage
WHERE post_no = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.post_no
AND category = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.category
AND roster_no = :POST_HISTORY_SINGLE.roster_no;
AND idcode = :POST_HISTORY_MULTIPLE.idcode;These update statements are without where clause, so it will update all records.
If it is specific to oracle forms then u may get better help at Forms section.

Regarding "Update .. From Table" Statement

Hi,
I have an existing piece of code which I'm trying to understand.
There are two scenarios regarding the UPDATE statement.
1) Scenario 1:
There exists a database table with around 100 or more fields/columns [Eg: DB_TABLE1].
An Internal Table exists with the same key as the above database table [EG: I_TABLE1].
code:
loop at I_TABLE1.
update DB_TABLE1
set kf1 = I_TABLE1-kfa
   kf2 = I_TABLE1-kfb
   kf3 = I_TABLE1-kfc
   kf4 = I_TABLE1-kfd
where key1 = I_TABLE1-keya AND key2 = I_TABLE1-keyb.
Endloop.
In the above scenario the records in database table [DB_TABLE1] with matching condition are updated and the rest of the fields are not touched. - Correct me if I am wrong.
2) Scenario 2:
There exists a database table with around 100 or more fields/columns [Eg: DB_TABLE1].
Two Internal Tables exist with the same key as the above database table [EG: I_TABLE1 And I_TABLE2].
Code part a:
SELECT * FROM DB_TABLE1 INTO TABLE I_TABLE2
      WHERE KF1 <> 0.
Internal Table 1 has some data.
Code part b:
loop at I_TABLE1.
update DB_TABLE1
set kf1 = I_TABLE1-kfa
   kf2 = I_TABLE1-kfb
   kf3 = I_TABLE1-kfc
   kf4 = I_TABLE1-kfd
where key1 = I_TABLE1-keya AND key2 = I_TABLE1-keyb.
Endloop.
Code part c:
update DB_TABLE1 FROM TABLE I_TABLE2.
In the second scenario what will be the final effect of DB_TABLE1?
As i understand it, there is no use of Code part b. Am I right?
I thought that the records in I_TABLE2 with matching key in DB_TABLE1 will be updated and the rest of the records will be deleted.
But actually there is not change in the DB_TABLE1 when the above code is executed.
Help is appreciated.
Thanks.

Hi Joey,
Scenario 1: In the above scenario the records in database table DB_TABLE1 with matching condition are updated and the rest of the fields are not touched.
- That's right.
Scenario 2: As i understand it, there is no use of Code part b.
- Exactly because of the following reasons:
1. Code part a shows data selected from DB_TABLE1 INTO TABLE I_TABLE2.
2. Code part c shows DB_TABLE1 updated from TABLE I_TABLE2 whereas Code part b uses ONLY internal table I_TABLE1.
3. If there are any operations performed in Code Part b on 'I_TABLE2', then this would have been different.
Regards,
Pranav.

Problem regarding updation of Z-table through maintenance view

hi ,
I m facing problem in updation of Z-table through maintenance view (SM30).
The scenario is that I have one customizing field in my Z-table which is checkbox.
Now I need to populate 2 fields in Z-table on tick of this checkbox and clicking of SAVE button.
For this I have created one module ''change_field'' in PAI.
Actually my database table is being updated but as soon as the control left my module all the updation that take place vanishes away.....
So please help me in this matter.

Thanks for ur previous effort it is updating the database but its effect is not shown immediately on screen.After i referesh the transaction it is dispalying the data.
So can u please suggest me any way....
Now i have one scenario infront of me....
I need to restrict the data shown in maintenance view.
I think it would be same as pop-up window displayed when we tick on 2nd radiobutton ("ENTER CONDITIONS")
of intial screen of t-code SM30.
Please suggest what shud i do....
Thanks and reagrds,
Amit
Edited by: amit gupta on Jul 18, 2008 1:35 PM

Emergency: problem with update statement!

hello guys, i have a very serious problem with an update statement in pl/sql.
i had an application written in sybase, where i had the following update statement:
update mis_dik_adeia
set trexon_etos_days = days_per_year
from mis_dik_adeia, mis_plafon_adeivn
where mis_dik_adeia.adeia_id = mis_plafon_adeivn.adeia_id
and mis_dik_adeia.adeia_id between :aapo and :aews
and mis_dik_adeia.employee_id = :erg
and mis_dik_adeia.etos = :etos
and mis_plafon_adeivn.years_yphr = ( select max( a.years_yphr ) from mis_plafon_adeivn a where a.adeia_id = mis_plafon_adeivn.adeia_id and a.years_yphr <= :eth ) using sqlca;
This is working properly in sybase. When i copied this code in pl/sql it displayed me error and it's impossible to work. Then i thought to make a nested select statement like this:
update mis_dik_adeia
set trexon_etos_days = (select days_per_year
from mis_dik_adeia, mis_plafon_adeivn
where mis_dik_adeia.adeia_id = mis_plafon_adeivn.adeia_id
and mis_dik_adeia.adeia_id between aapo and aews
and mis_dik_adeia.employee_id = erg
and mis_dik_adeia.etos = etos1
and mis_plafon_adeivn.years_yphr = (
select max( a.years_yphr )
from mis_plafon_adeivn a
where a.adeia_id = mis_plafon_adeivn.adeia_id
and a.years_yphr <= eth )
but as you can understand, it is working, but it doesn't produce the same results as the update statement in Sybase!
It is very important for me to solve this problem , which is a very big trouble for me for a long time.
Please if anyone can help me i would appreciate it a lot!
Regards ,
Bill...

Bill,
folowing the logic of your original query by Sybase
(it's embedded SQL in Power Builder, isn't it ?):
update mis_dik_adeia
set trexon_etos_days = (select days_per_year
from mis_plafon_adeivn
where mis_dik_adeia.adeia_id = mis_plafon_adeivn.adeia_id
and mis_plafon_adeivn.years_yphr = (
select max( a.years_yphr )
from mis_plafon_adeivn a
where a.adeia_id = mis_plafon_adeivn.adeia_id
and a.years_yphr <= eth )
where
mis_dik_adeia.adeia_id between aapo and aews
and mis_dik_adeia.employee_id = erg
and mis_dik_adeia.etos = etos1
and
exists (select 1
from mis_plafon_adeivn
where mis_dik_adeia.adeia_id = mis_plafon_adeivn.adeia_id
and mis_plafon_adeivn.years_yphr = (
select max( a.years_yphr )
from mis_plafon_adeivn a
where a.adeia_id = mis_plafon_adeivn.adeia_id
and a.years_yphr <= eth )
In 9i you can also try the following:
megre into mis_dik_adeia
using (
select
days_per_year,
mis_dik_adeia.rowid rid
from mis_dik_adeia, mis_plafon_adeivn
where mis_dik_adeia.adeia_id = mis_plafon_adeivn.adeia_id
mis_dik_adeia.adeia_id between aapo and aews
and mis_dik_adeia.employee_id = erg
and mis_dik_adeia.etos = etos1
and mis_plafon_adeivn.years_yphr =
(select max( a.years_yphr )
from mis_plafon_adeivn a
where a.adeia_id = mis_plafon_adeivn.adeia_id
and a.years_yphr <= eth)
) src
on (mis_dik_adeia.rowid = src.rid)
when matched then
update set mis_dik_adeia.trexon_etos_days = src.days_per_year
when not matched then
insert (mis_dik_adeia.adeia_id) values(0);
In 10G it can be easily:
megre into mis_dik_adeia
using (
select
days_per_year,
mis_dik_adeia.rowid rid
from mis_dik_adeia, mis_plafon_adeivn
where mis_dik_adeia.adeia_id = mis_plafon_adeivn.adeia_id
mis_dik_adeia.adeia_id between aapo and aews
and mis_dik_adeia.employee_id = erg
and mis_dik_adeia.etos = etos1
and mis_plafon_adeivn.years_yphr =
(select max( a.years_yphr )
from mis_plafon_adeivn a
where a.adeia_id = mis_plafon_adeivn.adeia_id
and a.years_yphr <= eth)
) src
on (mis_dik_adeia.rowid = src.rid)
when matched then
update set mis_dik_adeia.trexon_etos_days = src.days_per_year;
I have to notice I didn't check it carefully, so I can miss...
Rgds.
Corrected a mistake in the table name
Message was edited by:
dnikiforov

Update statement for object table.

Hi,
I have created one type as
Create type test as object(
ins_by varchar2(30),
ins_on date,
upd_by varchar2( 30),
upd_on date);
and then created an object table as
create table imst(
i_code number(5),
i_desc varchar2(35),
i_op test);
now i am able to insert record in this table as
insert into imst values(1,'Hawkins cooker',test(user,sysdate,'',''));
Above works fine.
But I would also like to update the record with i_op.upd_by,i_op.upd_on with some other values.
Can any body help me specifying how to write a plain update statement for the same.
Regards.
Soumen

Check it out:
SQL> Create type myTest as object(
2 ins_by varchar2(30),
3 ins_on date,
4 upd_by varchar2( 30),
5 upd_on date);
6 /
Type created.
SQL> create table imst(
2 i_code number(5),
3 i_desc varchar2(35),
4 i_op myTest);
Table created.
SQL> insert into imst values(1,'Hawkins cooker', mytest(user,sysdate,'',''));
1 row created.
SQL> select * from imst;
    I_CODE I_DESC
I_OP(INS_BY, INS_ON, UPD_BY, UPD_ON)
         1 Hawkins cooker
MYTEST('APC_LOAD', '12-JUL-04', NULL, NULL)
SQL> update imst i set i.i_op.upd_by = USER, i.i_op.upd_on = add_months(sysdate, 1);
1 row updated.
SQL> select * from imst;
    I_CODE I_DESC
I_OP(INS_BY, INS_ON, UPD_BY, UPD_ON)
         1 Hawkins cooker
MYTEST('APC_LOAD', '12-JUL-04', 'APC_LOAD', '12-AUG-04')
SQL> Smoke me a kipper I'll be back before breakfast.
Cheers, APC

Problem with update statement

Hi, i have the following data
document_seq_num, Country, LE, SOB
33100037     NL     000320     13
33100037     NL     000320     13
33100037     NL     000320     13
33100037     NL     000320     13
33100038     NL     000320     13
33100038     NL     000320     13
33100038     NL     000320     13
33100038     NL     000320     13
33100039     NL     000320     13
33100039     NL     000320     13
33100039     NL     000320     13
33100039     NL     000320     13
33100040     NL     000320     13
33100040     NL     000320     13
33100040     NL     000320     13
33100040     NL     000320     13
33100041     NL     000320     13
33100041     NL     000320     13
33100041     NL     000320     13
33100041     NL     000320     13
33100042     NL     000320     13
33100042     NL     000320     13
33100042     NL     000320     13
33100042     NL     000320     13
33100043     NL     000320     13
33100043     NL     000320     13
33100043     NL     000320     13
33100043     NL     000320     13
i want an update statement for every change in the document sequnce with the other combination..
the seqence number should change.
i tried to write a rank over partion and and sequence but when i am trying to update, this is always updating
90000000 in first run, as it is in loop for all records it is updating the same. i want an
increment to the sequence for every change in document_seq_num
Can any one help me to correct this procedure
create or replace PROCEDURE test is
cursor cur_voc_ref
IS SELECT a.document_seq_num,
a.country, a.LE, a.SOB, 2009, Rank() over (partition by
a.country, a.LE, a.SOB
order by a.document_seq_num, a.country, a.LE, a.SOB)
from (select distinct document_seq_num,
country, LE, SOB,period_name
from temp_tab
where country= 'NL'
and LE= '000320'
and SOB=13
order by SOB,LE,document_seq_num) a
where
a.country= 'NL'
and a.LE= '000320'
and a.SOB=13
and substr(a.period_name,5,6) =substr(2009,3,4);
v_base number;
BEGIN
FOR c_rec IN cur_voc_ref
LOOP
BEGIN
select nvl(max(ggtsi.reference), substr(2009,3,2)*1000000) into v_base
from temp_tab ggtsi;
update temp_tab
set reference= v_base
where document_seq_num= c_rec.document_seq_num
and country=c_rec.country
and le=c_rec.le
and sob=c_rec.sob;
commit;
END;
END LOOP;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
dbms_output.put_line( 'Exception in opening balance insert ' || SQLCODE || ' ' || SQLERRM );
END;

user11289444 wrote:
Hi, i have the following data
document_seq_num, Country, LE, SOB
33100037     NL     000320     13
33100037     NL     000320     13
33100037     NL     000320     13
33100037     NL     000320     13
33100038     NL     000320     13
33100038     NL     000320     13
33100038     NL     000320     13
33100038     NL     000320     13
33100039     NL     000320     13
33100039     NL     000320     13
33100039     NL     000320     13
33100039     NL     000320     13
33100040     NL     000320     13
33100040     NL     000320     13
33100040     NL     000320     13
33100040     NL     000320     13
33100041     NL     000320     13
33100041     NL     000320     13
33100041     NL     000320     13
33100041     NL     000320     13
33100042     NL     000320     13
33100042     NL     000320     13
33100042     NL     000320     13
33100042     NL     000320     13
33100043     NL     000320     13
33100043     NL     000320     13
33100043     NL     000320     13
33100043     NL     000320     13
i want an update statement for every change in the document sequnce with the other combination..
the seqence number should change.
i tried to write a rank over partion and and sequence but when i am trying to update, this is always updating
90000000 in first run, as it is in loop for all records it is updating the same. i want an
increment to the sequence for every change in document_seq_num
Can any one help me to correct this procedure
create or replace PROCEDURE test is
cursor cur_voc_ref
IS SELECT a.document_seq_num,
a.country, a.LE, a.SOB, 2009, Rank() over (partition by
a.country, a.LE, a.SOB
order by a.document_seq_num, a.country, a.LE, a.SOB)
from (select distinct document_seq_num,
country, LE, SOB,period_name
from temp_tab
where country= 'NL'
and LE= '000320'
and SOB=13
order by SOB,LE,document_seq_num) a
where
a.country= 'NL'
and a.LE= '000320'
and a.SOB=13
and substr(a.period_name,5,6) =substr(2009,3,4);
v_base number;
BEGIN
FOR c_rec IN cur_voc_ref
LOOP
BEGIN
select nvl(max(ggtsi.reference), substr(2009,3,2)*1000000) into v_base
from temp_tab ggtsi;
update temp_tab
set reference= v_base
where document_seq_num= c_rec.document_seq_num
and country=c_rec.country
and le=c_rec.le
and sob=c_rec.sob;
commit;
END;
END LOOP;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
dbms_output.put_line( 'Exception in opening balance insert ' || SQLCODE || ' ' || SQLERRM );
END;Hi,
I suggest you to add a column to preserve current RANK value for all rows, <preserve_rank> for example, and
when you add the new rows you will update your <preserve_rank> but you must pay attention to have the same value for
document_seq_num, with other words you may insert yours rows in a batch like this:
-- first update preserve_rank with RANK function
declare
v_doc_seq_num numeric;
begin
v_doc_seq_num:=33100040;
-- note !!!
-- put all into a valid sql command
-- and apply execute immediate
insert into temp_tab(document_seq_num, country, le, sob,Period_name)values(v_doc_seq_num, 'NL', '000320', 13,'APR-09');
insert into temp_tab(document_seq_num, country, le, sob,Period_name)values(v_doc_seq_num, 'NL', '000320', 13,'APR-09');
insert into temp_tab(document_seq_num, country, le, sob,Period_name)values(v_doc_seq_num, 'NL', '000320', 13,'APR-09');
-- update preserve_rank
update temp_tab x set x.preserve_rank = (Select max(preserve_rank) from temp_tab y
                                          where y.document_seq_num=v_doc_seq_num) old_rank + 1)
where (prserve_rank is null) and x.document_seq_num=v_doc_seq_num;
end; I know it's a lost a memory but the trigger is the last solution who can give us a nightmare.
Regards,
Ion
Edited by: user111444777 on Sep 25, 2009 11:12 AM
Edited by: user111444777 on Sep 25, 2009 11:35 AM

Lock Objects Problem while updating entries in custom table

Hi Friends,
Iam updating a custom table ztable from internal table entries.
ie : Modify ZTABLE from table ITAB.
Now the entries are updating and inserting perfectly..
But my problem is i need to use lock objects before doing this..
I have created a lock obect EZTABLE with all th ekey fields of the table.. ie : it has 2 key fields
item & matnr .
Now how to use lock objects here.. do i need to loop the internal table and use enque & deque function module each and every time in loop or use it out side the loop..
Can any one explain me this..
Regards,
Kumar

hi kumar,
**check if the equipment is already locked by user, if yes, trigger a mail
            CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_EIEQUI'
             EXPORTING
            MODE_EQUI            = 'E'
            MANDT                = SY-MANDT
               equnr                = lv_equi_temp
            X_EQUNR              = ' '
            _SCOPE               = '2'
            _WAIT                = ' '
            _COLLECT             = ' '
             EXCEPTIONS
               foreign_lock         = 1
               system_failure       = 2
               OTHERS               = 3.
            IF sy-subrc <> 0.
              lv_subrc1 = sy-subrc.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
        WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
            ELSE.
              CALL FUNCTION 'DEQUEUE_EIEQUI'
               EXPORTING
            MODE_EQUI       = 'E'
            MANDT           = SY-MANDT
                 equnr           = lv_equi_temp
            X_EQUNR         = ' '
            _SCOPE          = '3'
            _SYNCHRON       = ' '
            _COLLECT        = ' '
            ENDIF.
try like this to check if the object is locked....
u can also use
call function 'ENQUEUE,.
do the needful changes update the database then commit work
then call function 'DEQUEUE'
hope this helps,
tanmaya

Possible to check how much time an update statement on a table would take ?

Hello @all
I have a table with a fragmented Index, the table has an actula "user_updates" from 226'699.
How can i find out how much time an update on this table takes ?
i would like to check if there is any performance increase when i regroup the index (rebuild), cause the index has a fragementation of 85% now... (or should i delete the index completely) cause there are no user_seeks... only user_updates on the table...
and i thought that indexes only makes sense if users are reading from the table... am i wrong ? (cause on every update from the table, the index (indexes) have to be updated too...
Thanks and Regards
Dominic

Rebuilding the index will not likely result in a modification be quicker. At least not more than marginal. In fact, it might wven be slower, since if you currently have space on the index page for the new row and then rebuild so you *don't* have space then
the index rebuild will make that update be slower (at least for the cases where you get page splits).
However if the index isn't used to find rows (any of the other three columns), then you have an index which only cost you and doesn't help you!
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP |
web | blog
Tibor, check out this forum thread:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/64ad4f52-2fd8-4266-b4a4-5657c8870246/needed-more-answerers?forum=sqlgetstarted
Ed Price, Power BI & SQL Server Customer Program Manager (Blog,
Small Basic,
Wiki Ninjas,
Wiki)
Answer an interesting question?
Create a wiki article about it!

Problem in updating of standard database tables( S011, S012, S013).

Hi Gurus,
Here i am having the probelm with these transactions MCE1, MCE3, MCE5, MCE7.
In these t-codes we are not able to get Purchase Order Values... Please help me out from this ... To get the PO Value what should i do .... there PO values are showing '0.00' (Zero)..
These t-codes are using S011, S012, S013 tables, in those tables also PO value is not updating ( in these tables field NETWR is showing Zeros only)
this is urgent for my client...
Rewards in advance....
Regards,
Naveen Myneni

This is not ABAP but configuration issue. I'd suggest to contact your MM consultant or move this question to MM area.

Problems with Update Statement

How Can I combine these three statements into one single statement.. Heard that I can use Decode command over here... But dont know whether that was correct or not..
Appreciate ur help..
UPDATE LOTIDS_FINAL SET TEAM = 'MLA' WHERE SUBSTR( EXPT,1) = 'A';
UPDATE LOTIDS_FINAL SET TEAM = 'AMD' WHERE SUBSTR( EXPT,1) = 'D';
UPDATE LOTIDS_FINAL SET TEAM = 'TMP' WHERE SUBSTR( EXPT,1) = 'G';
I want these three statements to one statement which can reduce my full table scans from 3 times to 1 time (I think)

Try this:
UPDATE LOTIDS_FINAL
SET TEAM = DECODE (SUBSTR( EXPT,1,1), 'A', 'MLA', 'D', 'AMD', 'G', 'TMP', TEAM)
WHERE SUBSTR( EXPT,1,1) in ( 'A', 'D', 'G');

Problem regarding Update-Statement on se11 table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for