Problem with group by clause

Hi,
this is my query
SELECT inccodrid, inccau, count(*) AS record, sum(incprez) AS prezzo, sum(incpren) AS preno, sum(incprev) AS preve
FROM incassi
WHERE incuten='125' And incdemi Between #12/4/2002# And #12/4/2002#
GROUP BY inccodrid, inccau
ORDER BY inccau
when i execute this query with jdbc the runtime give me an error "stato del cursore non valido", but if i try to execute in msaccess the query work fine.... Anyone can help me?
Problem n 2
SELECT produzione.proid, inccodrid, inccau, count(*) AS record, sum(incprez) AS prezzo, sum(incpren) AS preno, sum(incprev) AS preve
FROM (produzione INNER JOIN titoli ON produzione.proid=titoli.titpro) INNER JOIN incassi ON titoli.titid=incassi.incevid
WHERE produzione.proid=dato And incdemi Between data1 And data2
GROUP BY produzione.proid, inccodrid, inccau
ORDER BY produzione.proid, inccau;
when i execute this query with jdbc he give me one record and no-error, but if i try to execute in msaccess the query work fine and give me 3 record???!!!
I know that access is not the greatest dbengine in the world, but i need to use it...
thanks
Baro

Can you please post part of your Java Code where you do your database things. maybe i can help you then.

Similar Messages

Aggregate fuction with group by clause

Hello,
Following is assignment is given but i dont get correct output
so please i am request to all of us write code to solve my problem.
There can be multiple records for one customer in VBAK tables with different combinations.
Considering that we do not need details of each sales order,
use Aggregate functions with GROUP BY clause in SELECT to read the fields.
<garbled code removed>
Moderator Message: Please paste the relevant portions of the code
Edited by: Suhas Saha on Nov 18, 2011 1:48 PM

So if you need not want all the repeated records, then you select all the values to an Internal table,
and declare an internal table of same type and Usee COLLECT
for ex:
itab1 type <xxxx>.
wa_itba like line of itab1.
itab2 type <xxxx>. "<-This should be same type of above.
select * from ..... into table itab1.
and now...
loop at itab1 into wa_itab.
collect wa_itab1 into itab2.
endloop.
then you will get your desired result..

Problem with order by clause

Hai all,
I have problem with order by clause,
My query is
"select number from table1 order by number asc "
and the output is displaying as
1
10
12
13
15
17
19
2
20
21
22
But if we give order by it should display as below only right ?
1
2
10
12
13
15
17
19
20
21
22 ........
Please help me why it is not displaying like it. and how to make the statement to display like the second case. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Uraja

The column datatype that you are selecting is not of NUMBER datatype(might be char or varchar2) hence you are getting such result set.
And for this purpose, it is recommended to set datatype of a column appropriately.
For now you can add TO_NUMBER function to column in ORDER BY clause, only if it has data of number type.
Edited by: Ora on 19 Nov, 2012 3:10 AM

Result set problem with GROUP BY

hi there, this should be the simplest of queries but.........
when run, the list size is 13, this is the number of letting units in the table. it appears not to be grouping by the property id.if it was doing this there should only be 8 rows. having said this, the while loop should output the count of each row, it does this 8 times with the correct counts. it then crashes with a invalid curser error. it appears the query is workig correctly but the resultset thinks its got 13 rows when it only has 8.
accessing ms access db
using jdbc:odbc
heres the code
searchResults = stmt.executeQuery(
"SELECT Count(*) AS FreeUnits " +
"FROM letting_units " +
"GROUP BY letting_units.property_id");
searchResults.last();
listSize = searchResults.getRow();
searchResults.beforeFirst();
System.out.println(listSize);
while (searchResults.next())
System.out.println(searchResults.getString(1));
hope someone can help me
cheers
andy

It's not the problem with GROUP BY. You should use scrollable result set to move in both directions (forward and backward).
In your code
searchResults.beforeFirst(); line may return false. So you will get the searchResults.next() false. Once you move forward in non-scrollable cursor cannot come back. So when you create the statement object use TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE or TYPE_SCROLL_SENSITIVE constants provided in the ResultSet.

Problem with Group policies and Administrator count

I have one problem with Group policies and Admnistrator count.
Win XP, Client 4.91, Client Zen 4
I use DLU for users.
the Group policies are well applied and i keep them after logout for
security reasons.
But my problem is, after logout, the Administrator count becomes this
Group policies, and the only technique that I use, is to remove the
repertories c:\windows\system32\GroupPolicy*. Administrator must
loguing again for having good policies.
Can you help me?

Bill,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Do a search of our knowledgebase at http://support.novell.com/search/kb_index.jsp
- Check all of the other support tools and options available at
http://support.novell.com.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://support.novell.com/forums/faq_general.html
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/

Analytic Functions with GROUP-BY Clause?

I'm just getting acquainted with analytical functions. I like them. I'm having a problem, though. I want to sum up the results, but either I'm running into a limitation or I'm writing the SQL wrong. Any hints for me?
Hypothetical Table SALES consisting of a DAY_ID, PRODUCT_ID, PURCHASER_ID, PURCHASE_PRICE lists all the
Hypothetical Business Question: Product prices can fluctuate over the course of a day. I want to know how much per day I would have made had I sold one each of all my products at their max price for that day. Silly question, I know, but it's the best I could come up with to show the problem.
INSERT INTO SALES VALUES(1,1,1,1.0);
INSERT INTO SALES VALUES(1,1,1,2.0);
INSERT INTO SALES VALUES(1,2,1,3.0);
INSERT INTO SALES VALUES(1,2,1,4.0);
INSERT INTO SALES VALUES(2,1,1,5.0);
INSERT INTO SALES VALUES(2,1,1,6.0);
INSERT INTO SALES VALUES(2,2,1,7.0);
INSERT INTO SALES VALUES(2,2,1,8.0);
COMMIT;
Day 1: Iif I had sold one product 1 at $2 and one product 2 at $4, I would have made 6$.
Day 2: Iif I had sold one product 1 at $6 and one product 2 at $8, I would have made 14$.
The desired result set is:
DAY_ID                 MY_MEASURE
1                        6
1                       14The following SQL gets me tantalizingly close:
SELECT DAY_ID,
MAX(PURCHASE_PRICE)
KEEP(DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY PURCHASE_PRICE DESC)
OVER(PARTITION BY DAY_ID, PRODUCT_ID) AS MY_MEASURE
FROM SALES
ORDER BY DAY_ID
DAY_ID                 MY_MEASURE
1                      2
1                      2
1                      4
1                      4
2                      6
2                      6
2                      8
2                      8But as you can see, my result set is "longer" than I wanted it to be. I want a single row per DAY_ID. I understand what the analytical functions are doing here, and I acknowledge that I am "not doing it right." I just can't seem to figure out how to make it work.
Trying to do a sum() of max() simply does not work, nor does any semblance of a group-by clause that I can come up with. Unfortunately, as soon as I add the windowing function, I am no longer allowed to use group-by expressions (I think).
I am using a reporting tool, so unfortunately using things like inline views are not an option. I need to be able to define "MY_MEASURE" as something the query tool can apply the SUM() function to in its generated SQL.
(Note: The actual problem is slightly less easy to conceptualize, but solving this conundrum will take me much closer to solving the other.)
I humbly solicit your collective wisdom, oh forum.

Thanks, SY. I went that way originally too. Unfortunately that's no different from what I could get without the RANK function.
SELECT DAY_ID,
        PRODUCT_ID,
        MAX(PURCHASE_PRICE) MAX_PRICE
FROM SALES
GROUP BY DAY_ID,
           PRODUCT_ID
ORDER BY DAY_ID,
           PRODUCT_ID
DAY_ID                 PRODUCT_ID             MAX_PRICE
1                      1                      2
1                      2                      4
2                      1                      6
2                      2                      8

Incorrect warning when parsing query with group by clause

I am using SQL Developer 4.0.0.13.80 with JDK 1.7.0_51 x64 on Windows 8.1
I have the following SQL, which works perfectly:
select substr(to_char(tot_amount), 0, 1) as digit, count(*)
from transactions
where tot_amount <> 0
group by substr(to_char(tot_amount), 0, 1)
order by digit;
However, SQL Developer is yellow-underlining the first line, telling me that:
SELECT list is inconsistent with GROUP BY; amend GROUP BY clause to: substr(to_char(rep_tot_amount), 0, 1), substr(to_char(rep_tot_amount),
which is clearly wrong.
Message was edited by: JamHan
Added code formatting.

Hello,
I also have found the same issue with the GROUP BY hint. Another problem I found is that the hint suggests to amend the GROUP BY members to add also constant values that are included in the SELECTed columns and whenever those constants include strings with spaces, it generates an invalid query. Normally, constant values won't affect grouping functions and as such they can be omitted from the GROUP BY members, but it seems SQL Dev thinks it differently.
For example, if you try the following query:
SELECT d.DNAME, sum(e.sal) amt, 'Total salary' report_title, 100 report_nr
FROM scott.emp e, scott.dept d
WHERE e.DEPTNO = d.DEPTNO
GROUP BY d.DNAME;
when you hover the mouse pointer on the yellow hint, a popup will show the following message:
SELECT list inconsistent with GROUP BY; amend GROUP BY clause to:
d.DNAME, 'Total, 100
If you click on the hint, it will amend the group by members to become:
GROUP BY d.DNAME, 'Total, 100;
that is clearly incorrect syntax. You may notice that after the change the yellow hint is still there, suggesting to amend further the GROUP BY members. If you click again on the hint, you will end with the following:
GROUP BY d.DNAME, 'Total, 100;
, 'Total, 100
and so on.
I am not sure if this behaviour was already known (Vadim??), but it would be nice if somebody could file a bug against it.
Finally when writing big queries with complex functions and constant columns, those yellow lines extend all over the select list and they are visually annoying, so I wonder if there is a way to disable the GROUP BY hint until it gets fixed.
Thanks for any suggestion,
Paolo

Custom IKM Knowledge Modules are not working with Group By Clause

Hi All,
I am facing an issue with custom IKM knowledge modules. Those are IKM Sql Incremental Update and IKM Sql Control Append.
My Scenario is
1. Created an interface with table on source and temporary datastore with some columns in target.
2. In the Interface on the target i defined one column as UD1 and other column as UD2 for which group by to be implemented .
3. Customized IKM Sql Incremental Update with " Group by " by making modification in my IKM Sql Incremental Update
detail step "Insert flow into I$ table" i.e., i replaced like this whereever i find this <%=odiRef.getGrpBy()%> API
Group By
<%=snpRef.getColList("","[EXPRESSION]","","","UD1")%>,
<%=snpRef.getColList("","[EXPRESSION]","","","UD2")%>
Up to UD5.
. Here in the place of [EXPRESSION] i passed column names for UD1 similarly other column name for [EXPRESSION] of UD2.
4.Made all the proper mappings and also selected the KM's needed for that interface like CKM Sql ,IKM Sql Incremental Update.
5. Executed the Interface with global context.
Error i am getting in this case is :
Caused By: java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:462)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:405)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.processError(T4C8Oall.java:931)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIfun.receive(T4CTTIfun.java:481)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIfun.doRPC(T4CTTIfun.java:205)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.doOALL(T4C8Oall.java:548)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.doOall8(T4CPreparedStatement.java:217)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeForRows(T4CPreparedStatement.java:1115)
Here the columns in the select clause are there in Group By also.
I did the same scenario using IKM Sql to file append .In that case i am able to do it. But not with the above mentioned KM's. Please let me know if any one know it or tried with this, as it is
high priority for me.
Please help me out.
Thanks,
keerthi

Hi Keerthi,
If your are transfering data from Oracle to Oracle (I means source is oracle Db and target is also oracle DB) then use below KM's and group by will come automatically based on the key values you selected on interface target datastore
1) CKM Oracle
2) LKM Oracle to Oracle (DBLINK)
3) IKM Oracle Incremental Update (MERGE)
Hope this will helps to resolve your issue
Regards,
Phanikanth

Problem with Grouping in Interactive Forms by Adobe

Hey Guys!
I have a problem using the group function for a table in Interactive Forms by Adobe and I have not found a solution yet, so I hope anybody can help me.
I've created the table in the LiveCycle Designer using subforms and I want to use the group function for a specific field of my table. Now the problem is that the entries of the table are not shown grouped for the same values of my specific field but there is still one row for each entry. How do I have to edit binding, flow etc. for the subforms of a group?
I hope anybody can help me or provide me a better solution.
Thanks in advance.
Martin

Hi Otto,
thanks for your reply.
I'm sorry the 'grouping function' I've announced is called 'control levels' in English I can set this function for a field of a table in the context of the form in the transaction SFP in SAP. Then in the hierarchy the field is displayed above the group of the other fields of the table. Usually in the form this should lead to a 'grouping' for the specific field so if you have identical values there is just one entry in the form and all the rows that have this value should appear behind. My problem is that there is still one entry in the form for every row.
Right now I'm using the solution you mentioned with the nested tables but i have some problems with the layout and page breaks (pagination).
Thanks for your help.
Martin

Anyone else having problems with group messages in iOS 7?

Upgrade to iOS7 went fine. Everything worked smoothly up until about 6:30pm Central time. Can't send/receive group messages in iMessage. Anyone else?
Not sure if this is a problem with my phone or iMessage.

It has failed to work on two of my iOS devices. I am using air 2.6.
This is my code:
Bookmark = SharedObject.getLocal("bookmarkData", "/");
if (Bookmark.data == undefined){
Bookmark.data['lessonIndex'] = 0;
lessonIndex = Bookmark.data['lessonIndex'];
LessonIndex is always 0 at the start of the program. This is a product killing problem. If I cannot resolve this 3 years of work has just been flushed down the toilet.

Default Sorting behaviour of Oracle 9i in 11g along with group by clause

Hi,
We have recently migrated from 9i to 11g. The reports from application comes in a jumbled fashion. Later we understood when there is a group by clause in the query, the recordset will be sorted by default in 9i and this feature is not available in 11g. Do anyone faced the same issue and resolved at the DB level.
Only alternate we found is the change in code with addittional order by clause which will take a long time to complete and roll out the same.
If anyone has got any immediate solution, please let me know.
Thx in advance.
Sheen

Hi,
A group by can sort (depending on the method of grouping) but it isn't necessary. If you want to sort the output you need the ORDER BY clause. There are different group by mechanismes between 9i and 11g. 10g introduced HASH GROUP BY where in 9i only the SORT GROUP BY existed. The latter gives a sorted set, the first not.
if you want the same behaviour you can use "_gby_hash_aggregation_enabled parameter" = false, which disables the hash group by.
Have also a look at the support document "'Group By' Does Not Guarantee a Sort Without Order By Clause In 10g and Above [ID 345048.1]".
Herald ten Dam
http://htendam.wordpress.com

Strange behavior in inner query with group by clause

Hi All,
I found a very strange behaviour with Inner query having a group by clause.
Please look the sample code
Select b,c,qty from (select a,b,c,sum(d) qty from tab_xyz group by b,c);
This query gives output by summing b,c wise. But when i run the inner query it gives error as "not a group by expression "
My question is - though the inner query is wrong, how is it possible that this query gives output.
it behaves like -
Select b,c,qty from (select b,c,sum(d) qty from tab_xyz group by b,c);
Is it a normal behaviour ?
If it is a normal behaviour, then how group by behaves inside a inner query.
Thanks !!

This case I have tested already and it throws error.
But why the initial posted query is not throwing
error even the inner query is wrong.
In what way oracle behaves for the initial posted
query?what is the scenario that throws the error? is it at the time when you only run the inner query or the whole query?

Problems with GROUP BY - not a GROUP BY expression

Hello,
I am fighting little bit with GROUP BY expression.
After some tests I am able to reduce the problem to following...
When can I use column numbers in GROUP BY expression?
Consider this situation:
CREATE TABLE EMP4 (
NAME VARCHAR2(10)
COMMIT;
INSERT INTO EMP4 VALUES('Tamara');
INSERT INTO EMP4 VALUES('John');
INSERT INTO EMP4 VALUES('Joseph');
COMMIT;
SELECT NAME, COUNT(*)
FROM EMP4
GROUP BY 1;
00979. 00000 - "not a GROUP BY expression"
-- This is working
SELECT NAME, COUNT(*)
FROM EMP4
GROUP BY NAME;Why is the GROUP BY 1 not workig?
I am using the GROUP BY 1 because in real query there is some PL/SQL function which somehow modifies the column NAME, so I can't use the column name
SELECT TEST_PACKAGE.AppendSomeCharacter(NAME), COUNT(*)
FROM EMP4
GROUP BY 1;Of course I can nest the query and move the COUNT and GROUP BY to outer query or maybe something else, but I was just curious why is the GROUP BY not working...
Also in real query, there are 3 columns in the GROUP BY expression, so I have there GROUP BY 1, 2, 3
Thanks for help

hai
try the following
CREATE TABLE TBL(ID NUMBER,VAL VARCHAR(20));
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(1,'Z');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(2,'X');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(1,'Z');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(2,'X');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(3,'A');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(4,'H');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(5,'B');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(6,'C');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(7,'T');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(3,'A');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(4,'H');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(5,'B');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(6,'C');
INSERT INTO TBL VALUES(7,'T');
CREATE TYPE SAMPLETYPE AS OBJECT ( ID NUMBER, NAME
VARCHAR2(25) ) ;
CREATE TYPE SAMPETBLTYPE AS TABLE OF SAMPLETYPE;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION SAMPLEFUNC
p_colname varchar2
)return SAMPETBLTYPE pipelined as
ret_val SAMPLETYPE;
TYPE cursor_ref IS REF CURSOR;
fcur cursor_ref;
di TBL%ROWTYPE;
sqlstr varchar2(1000);
colname varchar(30):=p_colname;
begin
sqlstr:='SELECT * FROM TBL ORDER BY '|| colname ;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(sqlstr);
open fcur FOR sqlstr;
loop
FETCH fcur INTO di;
EXIT WHEN fcur%NOTFOUND;
ret_val:=SAMPLETYPE(di.ID,di.VAL);
PIPE ROW(ret_val);
end loop;
close fcur;
return;
end;
select * from table(SAMPLEFUNC('ID'));
select * from table(SAMPLEFUNC('VAL'));

Reg - Search Form for a VO with group by clause

Hi,
I have a Bar graph that displays data based on the Query below.
SELECT STATUS.STATUS_ID AS STATUSID,STATUS.STATUS,COUNT(SR.SERVICEREQUEST_ID) AS SRCOUNT
FROM SERVICE_REQUEST SR ,SERVICEREQUESTSTATUS STATUS
WHERE SR.STATUS_ID = STATUS.STATUS_ID
GROUP BY STATUS.STATUS_ID,STATUS.STATUS,SR.STATUS_ID
It displays the count of SRs against a particular status.
Now I need to add a search form to this graph with customer and date range.
So we need to add the line below to the where clause.
"SR.CUSTOMER_ID = :customerId AND SR.REQUESTED_ON BETWEEN :fromDate and :toDate"
But the columns SR.CUSTOMER_ID, SR.REQUESTED_ON also need to be added to the select clause to create the View criteria for search panel.
The two columns should also need to be added to the group by clause if we are to add them in the select clause.
This would not produce the expected results.
How do I create a search form with the criterias applied only at the where clause.Please help.
With Regards,
Guna

The [url http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E16162_01/apirefs.1112/e17483/oracle/jbo/server/ViewObjectImpl.html]ViewObjectImpl has methods for doing this programmatically (setQuery, defineNamedWhereClauseParam, setNamedWhereClauseParam) that you can use to manipulate the query, the bind variables expected, and the values for the binds.
John

Problem with Group Currency

I looking for help!!
We do a initial loading of financial postings with LSMW. We had a big problem!!
The postings were made without the amount at the group currency.
Now we show it at the reports of Controlling, too late for change the postings.
We need a solution for change this without do a new posting. Someone can help us?
The values at the local currency ARS are correct, we have just the problem with the group currency EUR.

IF the posting were made with out group currency, There is no way you will get the group currency. What you need to do is just load the balances in group currency using the tcode FBB1 and leave document and local currency fields zero.
Assign points if helpful

Problem with group by clause

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for