Problem with IN clause in..........

hello
select RECPT_FRM_DE,tenq_no from enq_folloup where tenq_no in (:dumy_enq)
in this :dummy_enq is a field with char as data type and tenq_no of the table is varchar2. when i enter more than one value in the :dummy_enq field with comma seperation ( eg. 1260,1265 ) no data is selected. how to correct this ?
regrds
Kris
Message was edited by:
Kris

First, could you edit your post above and change the subject to something like: Problem with IN (...) clause
Oracle does not parse the value in :dummy_enq. If you really want to use an IN list, you need to create multiple fields, and use:
select RECPT_FRM_DE,tenq_no from enq_folloup
where tenq_no in (:dumy_enq1, :dumy_enq2, :dumy_enq3)

Similar Messages

Problem with IN clause substitution in Sybase

I am experiencing a problem with IN clause substitution in
embedded SQL with a Sybase databse.
My Cold Fusion server is MX 7.
The Database is Adaptive Server Enterprise/12.5.0.3/EBF 10689
IR/P/Sun_svr4/OS 5.8/rel12503/1915/64-bit/FBO/Thu Jan 23 16:05:19
2003
Here's the problem. I have a Cold Fusion variable
bureau_incode which I am using to define the values in my IN
clause. When I comment out my query and display this value to the
HTML page, bureau_incode has the following value:
('OET','OGC','OIG','OLA','OMD','OMR','OSP','OTHER','OWD','PSHSB','WCB','WTB')
My embedded SQL CFQUERY looks like this:
quote:
<cfquery name="qResults" datasource="#request.dsn#">
Select Name,
bureau_code,
Telephone,
CellPhone,
Pager,
Email,
Availability,
Explanation,
Password,
Admin,
last_login = convert(varchar(20),last_login,0)
from PAMS where Availability = 'N'
<cfif #request.seltype# IS NOT "ALL">
and bureau_code IN #bureau_incode#
</cfif>
</cfquery>
When the code runs, I get the error
Error Executing Database Query. Incorrect syntax near 'OET'.
There is no incorrect syntax. Is there any special way to
submit the IN clause to ColdFusion MX 7? Previously, we were using
ColdFusion 4.5 (I believe) server, and the code worked perfectly,
albiet with double-quotes in the replacement string. Any help would
be appreciated. This type of substitution worked nicely in the
previous server version, I can't imagine why it would no longer
work.

No, I am not. The parentheses are part of the #bureau_incode#
coldfusion variable. I've edited the first message to make this
more clear. I have tried the query with the parentheses in the
#bureau_incode# variable, and with the parentheses in the CFquery
with (#bureau_incode#). The results are always the same.
I will indeed try to help with other stuff in the future. :)
Thanks for trying to help!

Urgent: Performance problem with where clause using IN and an OR condition

Select statement is:
select fl.feed_line_id
from ap_expense_feed_lines_all fl
where ((:1 is not null and
fl.feed_line_id in (select distinct r2.object_id
from xxdl_pcard_wf_routing_lists r2,
     per_people_f hr2
where upper(hr2.full_name) like upper(:1||'%')
          and hr2.person_id = r2.person_id
and r2.fyi_list is null
          and r2.sequence_number <> 0))
or
(:1 is null))
If I modify the statement to remove the "or (:1 is null))" part at the bottom of the where clause, it returns in .16 seconds. If I modify the statement to only contain the "(:1 is null))" part of the where clause, it returns in .02 seconds. With the whole statement above, it returns in 477 seconds. Anyone have any suggestions?
Explain plan for the whole statement is:
(1) SELECT STATEMENT CHOOSE
Est. Rows: 10,960 Cost: 212
FILTER
(2) TABLE ACCESS FULL AP.AP_EXPENSE_FEED_LINES_ALL [Analyzed]
(2) Blocks: 8,610 Est. Rows: 10,960 of 209,260 Cost: 212
Tablespace: APD
(6) TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR.PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F [Analyzed]
(6) Blocks: 4,580 Est. Rows: 1 of 85,500 Cost: 2
Tablespace: HRD
(5) NESTED LOOPS
Est. Rows: 1 Cost: 4
(3) TABLE ACCESS FULL XXDL.XXDL_PCARD_WF_ROUTING_LISTS [Analyzed]
(3) Blocks: 19 Est. Rows: 1 of 1,303 Cost: 2
Tablespace: XXDLD
(4) UNIQUE INDEX RANGE SCAN HR.PER_PEOPLE_F_PK [Analyzed]
Est. Rows: 1 Cost: 1
Thanks in advance,
Peter

Thanks for the reply, but I have already checked what you are suggesting and I am pretty sure those are not causing the problem. The hr2.full_name column has an upper index and the (4) line of the explain plan shows that index being used. In addition, that part of the query executes on its own quickly.
Because the sql is not displayed in an indented format on this page it is a little hard to understand the structure so I am going to restate what is happening.
My sql is:
select a_column
from a_table
where ((:1 is not null) and a_column in (sub-select statement)
or
(:1 is null))
The :1 bind variable is set to a varchar2 entered on the screen of an application.
If I execute either part of the sql without the OR condition, performance is good.
If the :1 bind variable is null with the whole sql statement (so all rows or a_table are returned), performance is still good.
If the :1 bind variable is a not-null value with the whole sql statement, performance stinks.
As an example:
where (('wa' is not null) and a_column in (sub-select statement)) -- fast
where (('wa' is null)) -- fast
where (('' is not null) and a_column in (sub-select statement) -- fast
or
('' is null))
where (('wa' is not null) and a_column in (sub-select statement) -- slow
or
('wa' is null))

Problems with WHERE CLAUSE in selects executed by BAPIs

Dear Experts,
I'm trying to make a SAP Java Connector. My problem is that, when they are called by Java, BAPI functions don't run in the same manner as in SAP testing mode .
I tested two BAPI functions called through my connector and I saw with the debbuger that BAPI functions don't execute the select and loop at with a WHERE clause when they are called by Java, therefore they throw errors. But in the SAP testing mode functions work just fine.
I'm new to SAP and I don't know why this happens. Would you like to explain to me how to fix this problem?
Thank you very much.
Kind regards,
Maricica

979380 wrote:
Yeah,i m sorry.I m a forum newbie.All right,we ve been given an oracle account for the purpose of this project,an we have connect to the oracle database either via linux terminal with sqlplus,or via oracle client and plsql.So i have to create some tables,then fill these tables with tuples(we ve been given fixed .sql files to do that),and we re suggested to do that from the linux terminal.I did that successfully.Then we have to run some queries either in terminal or plsql.I chose plsql.I connect,i can see the tables that i have created but when i run(in both sql and terminal window) for example the query "select * from table_1",i take 0 rows as a result.I tested to run the query from terminal(with sqlplus) to see if the tables are really empty,but i recieve the results as i should.
I am sorry for my chaotic writing but i cant even explain the problem to myself better and i m not a native.
(im using oracle version 11.2.0.1, this is the first time i m using oracle databases and i m a rookie in databases in general)
Edited by: 979380 on 1 Ιαν 2013 10:33 πμ
[oracle@localhost ~]$ sqlplus user1/user1
SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.2.0 Production on Tue Jan 1 11:19:29 2013
Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> create table table_1 (id number);
Table created.
SQL> select * from table_1;
no rows selected
SQL> insert into table_1 values(1);
1 row created.
SQL> select * from table_1;
ID
1
SQL> in order to SELECT any rows from any table, first you must INSERT data into the table!
is COPY & PASTE broken for you?

Problem with IN Clause in Query

hi,
i have a query
select RECPT_FRM_DE,tenq_no from enq_folloup where tenq_no in ('&dumy_enq')
in this the tenq_no of the table is varchar2 and the &dummy_enq which comes from the user screen is also of char type. but when the user enters 1260,1265 in the user screen as a comma seperated values to query for both values, not data is returned. but if try in sql by removing the quotes from this ie just &dummy_enq it gets the data. how to correct this
kris

hi,
in the front end there is only a single entry field, in which the user enters the data, it is of type char and user enters value 1260,1265 in this field. when it is passed it becomes '1260,1265' there is no appending.....
kris

Problem with performance of a query having order by, distinct clause

Hi,
I have a problem with queries having order by, distinct clause.
While its executing its taking lot of time. With DBMS_PROFILER identified the queries taking long time.
The table is having approximately 70 million rows.
Problem -1
select * from table_name order by col1;
select distinct col1,col2 from table_name;
Here i am having 2 solutions request to let me know whether i am right if not suggest me right solution.
Solution1:
Max parallel servers is 8.
select /* + parallel(table_name,8) */ * from table_name order by col1;
select /* + parallel(table_name,8) */ distinct col1, col2 from table_name ;
Solution-2:
select /* + first_rows */ * from table_name order by col1;
select /* + first_rows */ distinct col1, col2 from table_name ;
Problem-2
I am having a query with where condition on columns.
Select * from table_name where col1='value1' and col2!='value2';
Index created on col1 and col2.
As we no that not equal won't use index as it is a composite index it should use the lead column. but its not using the index.
Should i forcibly use index with hint or suggest me better solution.
Any help really appreciated.
Thanks in advance

unique wrote:
The table is having approximately 70 million rows.
select * from table_name order by col1;Do you really want 70,000,000 rows from your table without any restrictions ? And furthermore ordered output ? I honestly understand the slowness of that query.
Here i am having 2 solutions request to let me know whether i am right if not suggest me right solution.Who knows if you choosed the right solution. I would suggest to reconsider your query and the need of 70,000,000 returned rows.
Problem-2
I am having a query with where condition on columns.
Select * from table_name where col1='value1' and col2!='value2';Please, provide the explain plan, eventually the tkprof output could also help. And tables descirption AND indexes description.
And OS and Oracle version.
Nicolas.

Problem with DECODE block in WHERE clause

Hi,
I'm facing problem with DECODE statement. I just simulated my problem in the simple way as follows. If I execute this following query, I should get "hello", but I'm not getting anything (ZERO rows returned).
SELECT 'hello' FROM DUAL
WHERE 'sample1' in (DECODE(1, 1, '''sample1'', ''sample2'', ''sample3''',
2, '''sample4'', ''sample5'', ''sample6'''
I think some problem is there in my WHERE clause.
But When I'm exeucting the following query as a seperate query, then I'm getting the value of DECODE block properly, but didn;t understnad why its not returning the same way when I'm putting the same DECODE statement in WHERE clause.
SELECT DECODE(1, 1, '''sample1'', ''sample2'', ''sample3''',
2, '''sample4'', ''sample5'', ''sample6'''
FROM DUAL;
Please help me to get out of this problem. Thank you so much in advance.
Thanks,
Ramji.

The value returned by SELECT DECODE(1, 1, '''sample1'', ''sample2'', ''sample3''',2, '''sample4'', ''sample5'', ''sample6''') FROM DUAL;
'sample1', 'sample2', 'sample3' is a single string. Consider it x.
SELECT 'hello' FROM DUAL WHERE 'sample1' in ( DECODE(1, 1, '''sample1'', ''sample2'', ''sample3''',2, '''sample4'', ''sample5'', ''sample6'''));
is like SELECT 'hello' FROM DUAL WHERE 'sample1' in ('x');
or
SELECT 'hello' FROM DUAL WHERE 'sample1' in ('''sample1'', ''sample2'', ''sample3''') and not
SELECT 'hello' FROM DUAL WHERE 'sample1' in ('sample1', 'sample2', 'sample3');
For this same reason SELECT 'hello' FROM DUAL WHERE 'sample1' in (select '''sample1'', ''sample2'', ''sample3''' from dual);
also does'nt work.
Please use INSTR to find whether 'sample1' exists in the string 'sample1', 'sample2', 'sample3'.

Problem with the query in group by clause

hi, i have problem with group by clause, can some one please help me.
select
header_id,
(select sum(nvl(dr,0) - nvl(cr ,0)) from temp_tab a1
where
a1.country=a.country
and a1.source='AP'
and a1.header_id=a.header_id) WHT,
sum(dr),
sum(cr) from temp_tab a
group by header_id,
(select sum(nvl(dr,0) - nvl(cr ,0)) from temp_tab a1
where
a1.country=a.country
and a1.source='AP'
and a1.header_id=a.header_id)
select * from temp_tab
drop table temp_tab
create table temp_tab(header_id number ,line_num number, country varchar2(2),
source varchar2(2), dr number, cr number,primary key(header_id,line_num));
insert into temp_tab(header_id, line_num,country, source, dr,cr) values(1, 1,'NL','AP',100,20);
insert into temp_tab(header_id, line_num,country, source, dr,cr) values(1, 2,'PO','AP',20,20);
insert into temp_tab(header_id, line_num,country, source, dr,cr) values(1, 3,'NL','AP',70,20);
insert into temp_tab(header_id, line_num,country, source, dr,cr) values(2, 1,'NL','PA',100,20);
insert into temp_tab(header_id, line_num,country, source, dr,cr) values(2, 2,'NL','PA',100,20);
insert into temp_tab(header_id, line_num,country, source, dr,cr) values(3, 1,'KR','PO',100,20);
commit;
Appreciate your help.
Thanks,

select header_id,
         (select sum(nvl(dr,0) - nvl(cr ,0)) from temp_tab a1
         where a1.country=a.country
         and a1.source='AP'
         and a1.header_id=a.header_id) WHT,
         sum(dr),
         sum(cr)
from temp_tab a
group by header_id
,countryIt's kinda hard to follow what your query does... maybe because I'm only at my second coffee..
Edited by: Alex Nuijten on Oct 2, 2009 8:07 AM

WHERE clause in a SMARTFORM loop, problems with parenthesis

Hi all gurus,
a simple question: I'm coding a LOOP in the form builder for a smartform ... this simple loop should bind text elements to every position of a purchase order. The WHERE clause should be as follows:
WHERE GUID = WA_ITEM-GUID
AND ( TDID EQ 'ZDES' OR TDID EQ 'ZDST' ).
Anyway, in the Form Builder I didn't find a way to add parenthesis; I workarounded the problem with the following query:
(conditions in lines are in AND conjunction)
GUID EQ     WA_ITEM-GUID
TDID      EQ   'ZDES'
OR
GUID EQ     WA_ITEM-GUID
TDID      EQ 'ZDST'.
It's quite a 'bad' way, but it works. I wonder if there's a way to express "complex" WHERE clauses (with addiction of parenthesis) in Form Builder.
Thanks in advance

In this case, your solution is the one that works. However in more complex cases with more variables, this can proove difficult to make or mantain.
What I usually do is use the first part of the condition in the where and then add a condition to the printing area with the rest of the formula. Just remember to document this so that you'll find it easy and it's way more amintainable.
In this case the loop would contain WHERE GUID = WA_ITEM-GUID and the inside condition TDID EQ 'ZDES' OR TDID EQ 'ZDST. This creates the and between the two blocks.

Problem with order by clause

Hai all,
I have problem with order by clause,
My query is
"select number from table1 order by number asc "
and the output is displaying as
1
10
12
13
15
17
19
2
20
21
22
But if we give order by it should display as below only right ?
1
2
10
12
13
15
17
19
20
21
22 ........
Please help me why it is not displaying like it. and how to make the statement to display like the second case. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Uraja

The column datatype that you are selecting is not of NUMBER datatype(might be char or varchar2) hence you are getting such result set.
And for this purpose, it is recommended to set datatype of a column appropriately.
For now you can add TO_NUMBER function to column in ORDER BY clause, only if it has data of number type.
Edited by: Ora on 19 Nov, 2012 3:10 AM

Problem with table(cast..)) clause - timeout

Hello,
I've in shared memory one query in multiple copies - one differences between copies is in arguments count given with in clause. For example, in shared memory i have:
select name from a where id in (?);
select name from a where id in (?,?);
select name from a where id in (?,?,?);
I try to minimize size of shared memory by change this query as in example:
select name from a where id in (select * from table(cast(? as seqintegertable)))
In this case my shared memory is ok, but I have problem with timeout exception:
- time of executing query without cast is about 250 ms
- with cast: about 10560 ms and sometimes I get ORA-01652
Why this time is so long? Can I reduce it? Maybe I should change something other?

user13241971 wrote:
Why this time is so long? Can I reduce it? Maybe I should change something other?To know why your query takes so long: {thread:id=501834}
Likely it's because of wrong cardinalities, to which this excellent article gives possible solutions: http://www.oracle-developer.net/display.php?id=427
Regards,
Rob.

Problem with Oracle during installation of NW

Hi all,
I have to install SAP NW on one host(for example IP 192.168.2.2) with the Oracle being installed on different host(for example 192.168.2.3) but the installation od database instance fails. Installator can not connect to Oracle on different host. Could you pls help me with configuration of Oracle to be accessible by SAP NW installator. I think that it is the problem, because setting up SAP NW installator is clear and easy. Both hosts are running on Windows.
Thanks Gary

Hi Pascal,
finally forum is up
part of the log is
ERROR 2005-07-11 17:54:55
FKD-00034 Query returned more than one result.
ERROR 2005-07-11 17:54:55
FKD-00035 Query did not return a result. Select attribute WHERE WapsSystemName = getContextParameter ('WapsSystemName' ) AND WapsInstanceType = 'DB' , statement: <#1>
ERROR 2005-07-11 17:54:55
FKD-00029 Subselect for table t_SAPComponent_Waps_Instance_SHARED, column WapsInstanceOSFAName with WHERE clause WHERE WapsSystemName = getContextParameter ('WapsSystemName' ) AND WapsInstanceType = 'DB' failed.
ERROR 2005-07-11 17:54:55
MUT-02010 Internal error: Access to key db failed. Original message: Subselect to table >t_SAPComponent_Waps_Instance_SHARED< column name >WapsInstanceOSFAName< using where clause >WHERE WapsSystemName = getContextParameter ('WapsSystemName' ) AND WapsInstanceType = 'DB' < ends with an exception. ExceptionText :single select returns more than on row .
WARNING 2005-07-11 17:54:55
The step dialogGetCommonParams with step key SAPSYSTEM_DB|ind|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|SAPSYSTEM|ind|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|SAPComponent|ind|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|DatabaseSystem|ind|ind|ora|ind|ind|0|DatabaseCommonParameters|ind|ind|ora|ind|ind|0|dialogGetCommonParams was executed with status ERROR.
I am not experienced in oracle configuration, so it is possible that the problem is with the litener.
If you have any idea, please let me know. Thanks
Gary

Problem with dynamic LOV and function

Hello all!
I'm having a problem with a dynamic lov in APEX 3.0.1.00.08. Hope you can help me!
I have Report and Form application. On the Form page i have a Page Item (Popup Key LOV (Displays description, returns key value)).
When i submit the sql code in the 'List of vaules defention' box. I get the following message;
1 error has occurred
LOV query is invalid, a display and a return value are needed, the column names need to be different. If your query contains an in-line query, the first FROM clause in the SQL statement must not belong to the in-line query.
When i excecute the code below in TOAD or in the SQL Workshop it returns the values i want to see. But somehow APEX doesn't like the sql....
SELECT REC_OMSCHRIJVING d, REC_DNS_ID r FROM
TABLE(CAST(return_dns_lov_fn(:P2_DNS_ID) AS dns_table_type)) order by 1
returns_dns_lov_fn is a function, code is below;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION DRSSYS.return_dns_lov_fn (p2_dns_id number)
RETURN dns_table_type
AS
v_data dns_table_type := dns_table_type ();
BEGIN
IF p2_dns_id = 2
THEN
FOR c IN (SELECT dns_id dns, omschrijving oms
FROM d_status dst
WHERE dst.dns_id IN (8, 10))
LOOP
v_data.EXTEND;
v_data (v_data.COUNT) := dns_rectype (c.dns, c.oms);
END LOOP;
RETURN v_data;
END IF;
END;
and the types;
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE DRSSYS.dns_rectype AS OBJECT (rec_dns_id NUMBER, rec_omschrijving VARCHAR2(255));
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE DRSSYS.dns_table_type AS TABLE OF dns_rectype;
I tried some things i found on this forum, but they didn't work as well;
SELECT REC_OMSCHRIJVING display_value, REC_DNS_ID result_display FROM
TABLE(CAST(return_dns_lov_fn(:P2_DNS_ID) AS dns_table_type)) order by 1
SELECT REC_OMSCHRIJVING display_value d, REC_DNS_ID result_display r FROM
TABLE(CAST(return_dns_lov_fn(:P2_DNS_ID) AS dns_table_type)) order by 1
SELECT a.REC_OMSCHRIJVING display_value, a.REC_DNS_ID result_display FROM
TABLE(CAST(return_dns_lov_fn(:P2_DNS_ID) AS dns_table_type)) a order by 1
Edited by: rajan.arkenbout on 8-mei-2009 14:41
Edited by: rajan.arkenbout on 8-mei-2009 14:51

I just had the same problem when I used a function in a where clause.
I have a function that checks if the current user has acces or not (returning varchar 'Y' or 'N').
In where clause I have this:
where myFunction(:user, somePK) = 'Y'
It seems that when APEX checked if my query was valid, my function triggered and exception.
As Varad pointed out, check for exception that could be triggered by a null 'p2_dns_id'
Hope that helped you out.
Max

Having a problem with creating/using a primary key on a view

I have a problem with a primary key on a view
I created the view and primary key as follows:
CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW "MDD"."ROCK_LU" ("DESCRIPTION",
UNIQUE ("DESCRIPTION") RELY DISABLE,
CONSTRAINT "ROCK_LU_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("DESCRIPTION") RELY DISABLE) AS
SELECT DESCRIPTION
FROM MRMC_LU
WHERE ROCK = 'T';
The view with the primary key appears to have been created as there were no error messages. (The above was from the sql tab in sql developer.)
When I try to create the foreign key on my mdd_hr table - I get an error
/* hr_name - foreign key */
ALTER TABLE mdd_hr add CONSTRAINT hr_name_fk FOREIGN KEY (hr_name) REFERENCES rock_lu(description);
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-02270: no matching unique or primary key for this column-list.
When I lookup the index in sql developer, rock_lu_pk is not there.
All my other foreign keys work - but I don't understand what I am doing wrong with this one. Please help.
glenn
Background - as to why I want to use a view as a lookup table.
The MRMC_LU table that the view is created from is structured like:
DESCRIPTION - MINERAL - ROCK - MODIFIER - COMMODITY
ANHYDRITE - T - T - T
APLITE - T - - T
GRAPHITE - T - - - T
GREYWACKE - - T
DESCRIPTION is a list of all names of minerals, rocks, modifiers and commodities. T is entered in each valid field. Often a description name is used for both a mineral and a rock or a mineral and a commodity or any other combination. Because this database is just starting up, it was more efficient to create one table that could be updated (and thereby automatically update the MINERAL_LU, ROCK_LU, MODIFIER_LY, COMMODITY_LU views) rather than create and maintain four separate but similar tables. A primary key cannot be generated for the MRMC_LU table as there are nulls in each column
except DESCRIPTION.
Perhaps there is a smarter way to do this?

http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96540/statements_85a.htm#2065512
You can specify constraints on views and object views. You define the constraint at the view level using the out_of_line_constraint clause. You define the constraint as part of column or attribute specification using the inline_constraint clause after the appropriate alias.
Oracle does not enforce view constraints. However, operations on views are subject to the integrity constraints defined on the underlying base tables. This means that you can enforce constraints on views through constraints on base tables.
Restrictions on View Constraints
View constraints are a subset of table constraints and are subject to the following restrictions:
You can specify only unique, primary key, and foreign key constraints on views. However, you can define the view using the WITH CHECK OPTION clause, which is equivalent to specifying a check constraint for the view.
Because view constraints are not enforced directly, you cannot specify INITIALLY DEFERRED or DEFERRABLE.
View constraints are supported only in DISABLE NOVALIDATE mode. You must specify the keywords DISABLE NOVALIDATE when you declare the view constraint, and you cannot specify any other mode.
You cannot specify the using_index_clause, the exceptions_clause clause, or the ON DELETE clause of the references_clause.
You cannot define view constraints on attributes of an object column.
Rgds.

Problem with sqlldr and commit

Hi,
i have a problem with sqlldr and commit.
I have a simple table with one colum [ col_id number(6) not null ]. The column "col_id" is primary key in the table. I have one file with 100.000 records ( number from 0 to 99.999 ).
I want load the file in the table with sqlldr ( sql*loader ) but i want commit only if all records are loaded. If one record is discarded i want discarded all record of file.
The proble is that in coventional path the commit is on 64 row but if i want the same records of file isn't possible and in direct path sqlldr disable primary key :(
There are a solutions?
Thanks
I'm for the bad English

This is my table:
DROP TABLE TEST_SQLLOADER;
CREATE TABLE TEST_SQLLOADER
( COL_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT TEST_SQLLOADER_PK PRIMARY KEY (COL_ID)
This is my ctlfile ( test_sql_loader.ctl )
OPTIONS
DIRECT=false
,DISCARDMAX=1
,ERRORS=0
,ROWS=100000
load data
infile './test_sql_loader.csv'
append
into table TEST_SQLLOADER
fields terminated by "," optionally enclosed by '"'
( col_id )
test_sql_loader.csv
0
1
2
3
99999
i run sqlloader
sqlldr xxx/yyy@orcl control=test_sql_loader.ctl log=test_sql_loader.log
output on the screen
Commit point reached - logical record count 92256
Commit point reached - logical record count 93248
Commit point reached - logical record count 94240
Commit point reached - logical record count 95232
Commit point reached - logical record count 96224
Commit point reached - logical record count 97216
Commit point reached - logical record count 98208
Commit point reached - logical record count 99200
Commit point reached - logical record count 100000
Logfile
SQL*Loader: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production on Sat Oct 3 14:50:17 2009
Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Control File: test_sql_loader.ctl
Data File: ./test_sql_loader.csv
Bad File: test_sql_loader.bad
Discard File: none specified
(Allow all discards)
Number to load: ALL
Number to skip: 0
Errors allowed: 0
Bind array: 100000 rows, maximum of 256000 bytes
Continuation: none specified
Path used: Conventional
Table TEST_SQLLOADER, loaded from every logical record.
Insert option in effect for this table: APPEND
Column Name Position Len Term Encl Datatype
COL_ID FIRST * , O(") CHARACTER
value used for ROWS parameter changed from 100000 to 992
Table TEST_SQLLOADER:
100000 Rows successfully loaded.
0 Rows not loaded due to data errors.
0 Rows not loaded because all WHEN clauses were failed.
0 Rows not loaded because all fields were null.
Space allocated for bind array: 255936 bytes(992 rows)
Read buffer bytes: 1048576
Total logical records skipped: 0
Total logical records read: 100000
Total logical records rejected: 0
Total logical records discarded: 0
Run began on Sat Oct 03 14:50:17 2009
Run ended on Sat Oct 03 14:50:18 2009
Elapsed time was: 00:00:01.09
CPU time was: 00:00:00.06
The commit is on 992 row
if i have error on 993 record i have commit on first 992 row :(
Edited by: inter1908 on 3-ott-2009 15.00

Problem with IN clause in..........

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for