Problem with TC disk mounting with multiple accounts

I have a 1GB TC set up manually to back up with "accounts". Only in test mode so far, but soon plan to use this TC as a backup drive for about 6 users in a research group. Only research files will be backed up, but we want the privacy of separate accounts so that users dont disable TM to safeguard privacy..
(I also have a 500GB TC at home without accounts and all users can see all the sparsebundles)
As we have computers across subnets in our group, the way we set up TM is to create an AFP share (eg timecapsule.domain.edu) with a full IP address and login info saved, and then when TM works the first time it knows the full path in the future.
For any user, in Time Machine the 1GB TC can appear twice:
1) as the "root" Time Capsule drive (where a sparsebundle for each account can be written - just like at home) and
2) for an account-specific drive.
But as laptops move around, go home, and back, when they get back to the office only the "main Time Capsule drive" shows up automatically in Time Machine. The account-shares sometimes show up in the "Change Disk" menu, but as folders with red dashes indicating "no write access" - implying it at least remembers they were there. The specific user account shares do not show up without doing a manual "connect to server" (but then it works fine).
Is there a way to fix this so we do not have to do a "Connect to Server" every time we get back to work?
I have tried, using Keychain Access, to remove the info for the main Time Capsule share, so that hopefully only the account share info will be saved, but this does not seem to work.
Is there a way with the TC to have the TM share be "afp:IPaddress/useraccount"?
thanks.

just a bump since its been a week and no replies? Anyone else "sharing" their TC with other users? How do you set the default configs?

Similar Messages

  • Limti PO with Multiple account assignment Problem

    Hi,
    Can we create limit PO with Multiple account assignment.
    If yes, i have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post service entry sheet the value is posting for only first one cost centre/Order but not all.
    So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
    Reagrds,
    JM

    Hi Summer,
    We have implemented SAP Note 1165524 for multiple account assignment as suggested, and it is working fine for New POs.
    But we have old Purchase order which still have wrong commitment, and GR and IR are already posted for this PO, we have to reduce the commitment to Zero.
    there is one solution for this is set  'No further Invoice expected' check box selected in this PO, but in our case PO  went into error in process after doing this.
    Please help me to reduce commitment to zero for this old PO
    Thanks in advance
    Vikas

  • PO with multiple account assignments - non valuated / valuated GR

    Hi Experts,
    If I create a PO for goods with multiple account assignments the GR will not be valuated, but if I do the same for a service PO the GR will be valuated.
    What is the reason for this?
    Thanks in advance,
    Francisco Melo

    Hi,
    There is more of a qualitative response to the issue, rather than quantitative, If you go through SAP Note 204252 for GR of material it says that: "We have not implemented this function since users who post goods receipts would have to determine the distribution to individual account assignment items during partial deliveries. Generally, users cannot or should not determine this.
    An automatic distribution also causes problems and is also not implemented due to technical reasons".
    Means basically here a stores guy is doing GR and he maynot be competent enough to decide on the Account assignment front.
    However in general the service entry sheet is filled by departments who have got the work done, and are aware of the account assignment for that work.
    Hope this is helpful for you.
    Regards
    Chandra Shekhar

  • PO Error in Process with Multiple account assignment

    Hi ,
    I am working with Extended Classsic scenario.
    Problem is with PO with Multiple account assignement.
    There is only one user who is getting problem with one particular account assignement "CCC" - Cost Center RP.. . When PO gets created with this particular AAC , it goes into "Error in process" only for one user.
    In RZ20 it shows messsage as "Please enter quantity or percentage for account assignment" & "Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set f or multi acct. assgt.".
    On other hand , other users are able to order the PO with the same AAC without any error.
    What could be the reason behind this only for one user ?
    Regards,
    Sheetal

    Hi ,
    I have checked it intially and both are identical.
    Initialy the problem was, user had entered 128 times AA line items  ( added & deleted ) in the PO while in the SC it was having only 64.... Our system accepts line items till 99 , so i asked him to delete the items above 99 ..
    So after that POs error has gone and it went for approval..
    But after approval it again went into error in process
    Sheetal

  • "There is a problem with your account..." when opening online OneNote file within local OneNote app

    Hi,
    We have a tenancy DirSync connection a small number of staff so that they can have access to SharePoint, Visio and OneNote Online. When one such user logs onto the http://[groupsite].sharepoint.com site on his Windows 7 PC with Office 2013 installed,
    he can access the site successfully. He might then open a OneNote file online. However, if he was to then click the "Open In OneNote" button from the toolbar, and clicked "Yes" to the Microsoft OneNote Security Notice:
    "Microsoft Office has identified a potential security concern. This location may be unsafe".
    ... and then sign in with the same account to this box
    ... and then enters his correct credentials into the next "Sign In" window, it returns with the following message:
    "There is a problem with your account. Please try again later".
    Finally, the following message is returned within the MS OneNote app:
    "We couldn't open that location. It might not exist or you might not have permission to open it. Please contact the owner of onenote:https://[groupsite].sharepoint.com/sites/....one#SharePoint Team Site for more information."
    The user has reinstalled MS OneNote 2013 on the PC with no change. We have also removed all cached credentials from within Windows Credential Manager and rebooted with no success. The user can access all web-based resources such as SharePoint, OneNote and
    Visio, and he can open web-based Visio files locally on the locally-installed Visio app with no issues. This problem is specifically experienced when opening an online version of OneNote locally on a  PC that has either MS OneNote 2010 or OneNote 2013.
    Any assistance that you may be able to provide would be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Brian

    Thanks Maurice, for your reply.
    My Windows Account is already used to log into OneNote. It is the same Windows Account used to log into, and access online, the SharePointOnline, OneNote Online, etc., services. I tried, indeed, to sign out from my account within the client-version of OneNote
    but it returns the message "We can't remove Windows accounts".
    Again, this is the only account that has been used with this installation of OneNote, and it is that which has been uploaded by way of DirSync to Azure. It works for online versions of OneNote items, SharePoint and Visio, and for VisioOnline-based files
    that are opened within the local client-version of Visio. When trying to open the OneNote Online notebook within the local client-version of OneNote we get this issue.
    I have reinstalled Office with no success.
    Any help that you can provide in this regard would be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Brian

  • Problem with multiple Toplink/JPA apps in same server

    Anyone have experence of running serveral Toplink/ EJB-3 Web apps in the same server (OC4J, alas)?
    We seem to get a problem with the second app failing to initialise toplink, with an entity not found message. Each app runs OK on it's own.

    Yes, they access the same datasource and most of the tables overlap.
    We're thinking it might help to have common entity classes and put them in a shared library, but I don't know if this is relevant (setting up shared libraries complicates testing and tends to snowball, I reckon we need about 15 jars all told).
    I''ve had some funnies on OC4J before which I think may be to do with it's use of ClassLoaders, for example I initially put persistence.xml in the libary jar with the data model, but for some reason I get the entity not found error that way. It only seems to work if it's in the classes folder.
    For the moment we're getting arround the problem with multiple OC4J instances in the server.

  • Software updates won't install with multiple accounts

    I'm using an iMac with multiple accounts.  When I go to update software, the box comes up and lists the updates. Great.  When I click install, it says it must restart in order to install the updates. Fine.  But after it restarts it goes to the login page, and once I login, it seems to forget that it's in the midst of an install. I've tried this many times, from many other accounts.
    How can I get it to follow through with the updates without getting stuck at the login page?
    Thanks

    Are the apps installed in the main Applications folder or in each User's Applications folder? Apps installed in the root folder will be available for each user. Apps  installed in a User's Applications folder is individual to that User. You can drag these apps to the root Applications folder for easy updating.
    Macintosh HD Root folders
      Applications <--
      Library
      System
      Users

  • I used a prepaid Visa card on ITunes. The card no longer has money on it. It keeps telling me that there is a problem with my account (it's out of money).

    I do not have a regular credit card. I used a prepaid credit card on my ITunes account for a little while, but now the prepaid card is out of money. Every time I try to download new FREE apps, it says there is a problem with my account and that I need to put in new card information. There is no option for selecting none. I tried deleting the old information and entering it as a blank. It will not accept it. Every time I try to download free apps, it comes back with the account information page, and then I can go no further. I cannot even download an update to my IPad from Apple. Help!!

    Top up your debit and contact iTune support:
    https://ssl.apple.com/emea/support/itunes/contact.html

  • I have a problem with itunes account did not find a solution.

    Good morning
    I have a problem with itunes account did not find a solution.
    The problem: your apple id has been Dasabld
    I can not if download applications from the iTunes store
    Hoping to help me solve the problem
    Note my English is very weak
    I want to re-activate the iTunes account
    Thank you

    To Contact iTunes Customer Service Use this Link...
    Apple  Support  iTunes Store  Contact

  • BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE with Multiple Account Assignment

    Hi, Does anyone have an example code of this function with multiple account assigment values
    Or suggestions to implement this FM
    I´m beginner in abap
    Thanks
    <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 14, 2008 12:47 PM

    Hi, I saw that function,does anyone have a z program using this bapi
    with  Multiple Account Assignment structure
    thanks

  • GR Non-Valuated  with multiple account assignment

    Hi, gurus;
    some knows a user exit or badi that is used to undercheck the flag GR Non-valuated when PO with multiple account assignment is created (ME21N) ? It can have some consequence in later invoice verification?
    Thanks in advance
    R.Z.

    gr non valuated is done in case ur procuring the material for direct consumption so at the time of gr no posting to accounts occur but at the time of invoice recipet the system debits the g/l account and crdits the vendor account 
    this multiple account ***. is also necessary to mark with gr non valuated and gr check box so that u can change the account assignment at the time of invoice and that acc. assg. should also be changebale in backend .

  • Valuated GR with Multiple Account Assignment

    Hi SAP Experts!
    I would want to know the logic behind always using a Non-valuated GRs with Multiple Account Assignments.
    I am asking this because we would want to make use of the budget checking during GRs. More specifically, whenever there is a GR, the committed budget will move to the actual budget. In our business practice, more often than not, the invoice is entered much later than the GR. This would mean that the amount of the purchase will remain in the committed state even if the goods have already been received.
    Is there a way to work around this in SAP? Or is this the only way that it does this?
    Hope to hear from you guys soon. Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    I am sorry but the basic process is that you cannopt have a valuated receipt for a line with multiple account assignments.
    An alternative (albeit a not very good one) is to just use separate lines on the PO instead of multiple account assignment.
    this may not be any help, but I doubt if there are any user-friendly alternatives.
    Steve B

  • Partial invoice with multiple account assignment

    I'm using PO with multiple account assignment with distribution by percentage and proportional distribution for partial invoice.
    When i post invoice verification for this kind of orders the amount and quantity field in PO item are closed for update and no automatic proportional distribution has been performed.
    The only possibility to update amount in case of partial invoice is to update amount of each account assignment manually (using account assignment button).
    Why the amount and quantity fields are closed for update?
    How i can post partial invoice for multiple account assignment order without manual distribution of changed amounts among different account assignments items?
    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks Charlie.
    I am aware of that. But do we have that "partial invoice" field where we can select teh distribution as proportionate or sequence.
    My POs item are having around 30 to 45 account assignments. In that case it is not possible to manual distribute the amount.
    Please advise.
    Thanks,

  • Services with multiple account assignment.

    Hi all,
    How can I find out the POs which are having the multiple account assignment for the service line items from tables ?
    I am looking for services with multiple account assignments
    Regards

    Hi
    Go to SE16 , give table name -EKPO
    Now if you have purchase order nos with you then copy paste the PO numbers here , or select company code or site to restrict your entries. It will control the performance of the data execution.
    Then execute this (remove max no 200 ) . Go to Settings-- Format List -- Choose fields. Deselect all and select fields as per your requirement.If field names are coming in technical names you can change this via settings--User parameter and select -Field Label.
    You can extract this report to excel as well. Same PO number with all account assignment category.
    Please note if you have high volume of data then extract all the POs under service orders first from EKKO table and copy all the service PO numbers availbvale and paste in table EKPO, it will increase performance as well.
    Cheers
    Mukta

  • Asset PO with Multiple account assignment..!!!

    Hi all ,
    i am creating asset PO with multiple account assignment and having pricing condition 5.5% Octroi..
    While doing the MIRO , system should distrubuted octorie amount  to all the assets ( load to asset value )
    But system is not capture the octorie amount in MIRO...
    Any customization required for multiple account assignment in case of Asset PO ..??
    Please help.

    Hi,
    In MIRO, item detail screen, you check for a button which allows apportionment of the value.
    Regards
    Aloysius

  • PO with multiple account assignment

    Hi Experts,
    While creating PO for multiple account assignment system is automatically picking 'GR Non-Valuated' check box.After doing a GR no accouning document generated.
    How is the goods receipt valuated for a purchase order with multiple account assignment?
    Please explain.
    Thanks,
    Sanjana

    Hi,
    It is possible to create PO with multiple account assignment,but you will not get accounting document at the time of GR.it will happen at the time of MIRO,as i have allready explained.
    If you will create PO with multiple account assignment for Services,System will generate Accounting document at the time of GR.
    I hope it will clerify.
    Regards,
    Manish

Maybe you are looking for