Procedure takes long time to execute...

Hi all
i wrote the proxcedure but it takes long time to execute.
The INterdata table contains 300 records.
Here is the procedure:
create or replace procedure inter_filter
is
     /*v_sessionid interdata.sessionid%type;
     v_clientip interdata.clientip%type;
     v_userid interdata.userid%type;
     v_logindate interdata%type;
     v_createddate interdata%type;
     v_sourceurl interdata%type;
     v_destinationurl interdata%type;*/
     v_sessionid filter.sessionid%type;
     v_filterid filter.filterid%type;
     cursor c1 is
     select sessionid,clientip,browsertype,userid,logindate,createddate,sourceurl,destinationurl
     from interdata;
     cursor c2 is
     select sessionid,filterid
     from filter;
begin
     open c2;
     loop
          fetch c2 into v_sessionid,v_filterid;
          for i in c1 loop
               if i.sessionid = v_sessionid then
                    insert into filterdetail(filterdetailid,filterid,sourceurl,destinationurl,createddate)
                    values (filterdetail_seq.nextval,v_filterid,i.sourceurl,i.destinationurl,i.createddate);
               else
                    insert into filter (filterid,sessionid,clientip,browsertype,userid,logindate,createddate)
                    values (filter_seq.nextval,i.sessionid,i.clientip,i.browsertype,i.userid,i.logindate,i.createddate);
                    insert into filterdetail(filterdetailid,filterid,sourceurl,destinationurl,createddate)
                    values (filterdetail_seq.nextval,filter_seq.currval,i.sourceurl,i.destinationurl,i.createddate);
               end if;
          end loop;
     end loop;
     commit;
end
Please Help!
Prathamesh

i wrote the proxcedure but it takes long time to execute.Please define "long time". How long does it take? What are you expecting it to take?
The INterdata table contains 300 records.But how many records are there in the FILTER table? As this is the one you are driving off this is going to determine the length of time it takes to complete. Also, this solution inserts every row in the INTERDATA table for each row in the FILTER table - in other words, if the FILTER table has twenty rows to start with you are going to end up with 6000 rows in FILTERDETAIL. No wonder it takes a long time. Is that want you want?
Also of course, you are using PL/SQL cursors when you ought to be using set operations. Did you try the solution I posted in Re: Confusion in this  scenario>>>>>>> on this topic?
Cheers, APC

Similar Messages

  • Why it takes long time to execute on Production than staging?

    Hi Experts,
    Any help apreciated on below issue.
    I have one anonymous block for updating around 1 million records by joining 9 tables.
    This is proceeded to production by following environments. And all env have exact equal volume of data.
    development->Testing->Staging->Production.
    The funny problem is while it takes 5 mins to be executed in all environments, it takes 30 mins on production.
    why it happned and what can be action points for future?
    Thanks
    -J
    ==============
    If the performance is that different in the different environments, one or more statements must have different query plans in the different environments. The first step would be to get the query plans and compare them to figure out which statement(s) is/are running slowly.
    If there are different query plans, that implies that something is different between the environments. That could be any of
    - Oracle version
    - initialization parameters
    - data
    - object statistics
    - system statistics
    If you guarantee that the data is the same, I would tend to expect that the object statistics are different. How have you gathered statistics in the various environments? Can you move statistics from an environment where performance is acceptable to the environment where performance is unacceptable?
    I would also recommend following the advice others have given you. You don't want to commit in a loop and you want to do as much processing in SQL as possible.
    Justin
    ===============
    Thanks Steve for your inputs.
    My investigation resulted following 2 points.
    There are 2 main reasons why some scripts might take longer in live than on Staging.
    1: Weekend backups were running on the live server so slowing the server down allot.
    2: the tables are re-orged when they are imported into staging/Dev – so the table and index layout is optimal, on live the tables and indexes are not necessarily contiguous so in order to do the same work the server will need to do many more I/O operations.
    Can we have some action points to address these above issues?
    I think if data can be contigous then it may help.
    Best Regards
    -J
    ===============
    But before that, can you raise this in a seperate thread as there is a different issue going on in this thread?
    Cheers
    Sarma.
    ===========
    Posts: 4
    Registered: 08/28/06
    Re: Performance issue (Oracle 10.2.0.3.0)
    Posted: May 22, 2009 2:46 AM in response to: Radhakrishna Sa... Edit Reply
    Hey Sarma,
    Exterme aplogies to say that I don't know how to raise a new thread.
    Thanks in advnce for your help.
    -J
    user636482
    Posts: 202
    Registered: 05/15/08
    Re: Performance issue (Oracle 10.2.0.3.0)
    Posted: May 22, 2009 2:51 AM in response to: user527345 Reply
    Hi User 527345,
    Please follow the steps to raise a request in this Forum.
    1. Register urself.
    2. Go to the forum home and select the Technolgy where do you want to rasie a request.
    eg : If is related to Oracle DATAbase general then select Oracle databse general...
    3. clik on post new thread
    4. Give the summary of your issue.
    5. then submit the issue.
    please let me know if you need more information.
    Thank you

    Jayashree Mohanty wrote:
    My investigation resulted following 2 points.
    There are 2 main reasons why some scripts might take longer in live than on Staging.
    1: Weekend backups were running on the live server so slowing the server down allot.
    2: the tables are re-orged when they are imported into staging/Dev – so the table and index layout is optimal, on live the tables and indexes are not necessarily contiguous so in order to do the same work the server will need to do many more I/O operations.
    Can we have some action points to address these above issues?
    I think if data can be contigous then it may help.First , I didn't get at all what actually was that thing when you copied some part of don't know which post in your actual question? Please read this , it would help you post a proper question to get a proper answer ,
    http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
    Now, how did you come to the conclusion that the backups are actually making your query slower? What's the benchmark that you lead to this? And what's the meaning of the 2nd point , can you please explain it ?
    As others have also mentioned, please post the plan of the query at boththe staging and production, that only can tell that what's going on.
    HTH
    Aman....

  • Query takes long time to execute.

    Hi All,
    I have one query that takes 5 minutes to execute.
    The query depends on four tables.
    The table IBS_WORK_BANKDATA and IBS_ORG_BANKDATA contains 25 lack records. Table IBS_CURRENCYMASTER have 250 records and IBS_CURRENCYEEXCHANGERATE have 50 records.
    Out put of query contains 3500 records.
    Oracle version is 9.0.1.1 and OS is windows 2003 server.
    Query:
    select distinct trim(wrk.bd_alcd) as ALCD, wrk.bd_typecd as TypeCD, wrk.bd_forcd as FORCD, wrk.bd_curcd as CURCD,
    wrk.bd_councd as COUNCD, wrk.bd_sectcd as SECCD,
    wrk.bd_matcd as MATCD, wrk.bd_c_u_cd as C_U_CD, wrk.bd_s_u_cd as S_U_CD,
    0 as Org_FCBal,0 as ORG_Bal,case when wrk.bd_type='O' then wrk.bd_fc_bal else 0 end as Main_FCBal,
    case when wrk.bd_type='O' then (wrk.bd_fc_bal * nvl(exchg.cer_exchangerate, 1)) else 0 end as main_Bal,
    wrk.bd_rs_int,wrk.bd_rs_bal,wrk.bd_fc_int,wrk.bd_fc_bal,
    ' ' as TrackChangs
    from ibs_work_bankdata wrk inner join ibs_org_bankdata org ON org.bd_yrqtr = wrk.bd_yrqtr and org.bd_bkcode=wrk.bd_bkcode and org.bd_forcd = wrk.bd_forcd
    and wrk.BD_YRQTR=20044 and wrk.BD_BKCODE ='000'
    and wrk.BD_ALCD = '51' and wrk.BD_FORCD ='IN' and wrk.BD_TYPECD = '11'
    left join ibs_currencymaster curmst on curmst.cur_code = wrk.bd_curcd
    left join ibs_currencyexchangerate exchg on exchg.cer_currencyid = curmst.cur_id
    and exchg.cer_yearqtr = 20051 and exchg.CER_ACTIVE=1
    Explain Plan:
    SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = CHOOSE               Cost=26     Cardinality=1     Bytes=157
    SORT UNIQUE               Cost=26     Cardinality=1     Bytes=157
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     Object owner=RBI     Object name=IBS_ORG_BANKDATA     Cost=2     Cardinality=204     Bytes=2856
    NESTED LOOPS               Cost=26     Cardinality=1     Bytes=157
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER               Cost=24     Cardinality=1     Bytes=143
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER               Cost=23     Cardinality=1     Bytes=93
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     Object owner=RBI     Object name=IBS_WORK_BANKDATA     Cost=22     Cardinality=1     Bytes=52
    INDEX SKIP SCAN     Object owner=RBI     Object name=IBS_WORK_BANKDATA_IDX     Cost=7     Cardinality=1     
    TABLE ACCESS FULL     Object owner=RBI     Object name=IBS_CURRENCYMASTER     Cost=1     Cardinality=178     Bytes=7298
    TABLE ACCESS FULL     Object owner=RBI     Object name=IBS_CURRENCYEXCHANGERATE     Cost=1     Cardinality=19     Bytes=950
    INDEX RANGE SCAN     Object owner=RBI     Object name=IBS_ORG_BANKDATA_IDX     Cost=1     Cardinality=204     
    Please help me.
    Thanks in advance,
    Prathamesh.

    Hi prathemesh,
    Check whether the tables accessed by the query are recently analyzed.
    Thanks,
    Sathis.

  • Unflatten from string takes long time to execute in x64

    Hi All,
    I am running into an issue where "Unflatten from String" is taking enormous amout of memory n time in LV 2012 SP1 x64 to execute. I pass in a NOT flattened string to this function and it consumes ~5 Gigs of memory and takes more than 10 minutes to execute it. On x86, it executes almost instantly.
    It only happens if the input is not a flattened string. 
    Is this a known bug?
    I have attached the vi here for you to see the problem. If you run it on x64, it might take more than 10 mins to execute and your system will be in a hung state. 
    Ritesh
    Attachments:
    Flat String to Data bug.vi ‏9 KB

    LVCoder wrote:
    With "x64" I meant LV x64. It executes instantly on LV x86 running on Win 64 bit but on LV x64 it takes like eternity. 
    I know it cannot unflatten it and I want it to return an error. My actual code can receive a flattened or NOT flattened string and I have a case structure which handles different strings differently. 
    Be careful with that terminology, it only applies to the Windows Operating System with respect to 32-bit and 64-bit processors.  There is no such thing as LabVIEW x64, or LabVIEW x86.  The property terminology is LabVIEW 32-bit (the most common one, most people use, even on 64-bit OS's since it is the most fully supported), and LabVIEW 64-bit (not commonly used, doesn't have full support of all add-on modules and toolkits, and is mainly only used by people who need LabVIEW to analyze very large datasets.)

  • Query takes long time to execute on exceptional cases

    Hi Tuning Experts,
    My query runs on prod db on daily basis on fixed scheduled time, out of seven days, for 1-2 exeptional days it takes 7-10 hr which takes 10-15 min on rest of the days.
    I want to do RCA for it, so please help me how i can proceed. either i go with
    AUTOTRACE,TKPROF, EXPLAIN PLAN or STATSPACK, which is best method to find out the real culprit.
    Regards
    Asif

    To answer your question...
    Running AUTOTRACE and EXPLAIN PLAN against the query in your development environment won't help diagnose the abnormal executions in production. Statspack is a global thing. It's a good thing to run but probably of insufficient granularity for here.
    TKPROF is an anlyzing tool. You need something to analyze. Read this article on Interpreting Wait Events to find out how to set the 10046 event to gather evidence.
    Cheers, APC

  • Java Stored Procedures take longer to execute

    Hi,
    I am doing a comparison of Oracle and Java Stored procedures in terms of execution time. I have created a java stored proc and an Oracle stored proc both of which perform the same task. Upon execution, I find that the java proc takes longer time to execute.
    I have the following qs:-
    Why are Java Stored Procs slower than Oracle Stored Procs?
    How is a java stored proc executed as compared to an Oracle Stored Proc?
    Can someone give a detailed explanation of -
    - how a java stored proc is stored in the database?
    - what happens when it is executed?
    Thanks in advance
    Nusrat

    Why are Java Stored Procs slower than Oracle Stored Procs?java program slower than native code! hold the front page!
    On second thoughts don't bother.
    Cheers, APC

  • Oracle report formatting takes long time

    hi
    i am using oracle 10g Application Server 9.0.4.0.0 on Red hat linux AS 3
    oracle reports are run thru JSP's
    some reports take long time to execute though query in it if executed on sql plus are fast.
    it is fond that that formatting is going on for those reports
    what might be the reason for this??
    is the data fetched first and then formatting takes place as per data??
    waiting for reply
    Avinash

    hi
    i am using oracle 10g Application Server 9.0.4.0.0 on Red hat linux AS 3
    oracle reports are run thru JSP's
    some reports take long time to execute though query in it if executed on sql plus are fast.
    it is fond that that formatting is going on for those reports
    what might be the reason for this??
    is the data fetched first and then formatting takes place as per data??
    waiting for reply
    Avinash

  • My view take long time

    SELECT DISTINCT xxxx
    TO_CHAR(TRUNC(MTRAN.DAT_TRANSACTION_MTRAN), 'YYYY') DAT_TRANSACTION_MTRAN,
    NVL((SELECT DISTINCT SUM(MTRAN1.QTY_PRIMARY_MTRAN)
    FROM MAM_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS MTRAN1
    WHERE TO_CHAR(TRUNC(MTRAN1.DAT_TRANSACTION_MTRAN),
    'YYYY') =
    TO_CHAR(TRUNC(MTRAN.DAT_TRANSACTION_MTRAN),
    'YYYY')
    AND TO_CHAR(TRUNC(MTRAN1.DAT_TRANSACTION_MTRAN),
    'MM') = '01'
    AND MTRAN1.MTYP_TRANSACTION_TYPE_ID IN
    (41, 42, 43, 44, 45)
    AND MTRAN1.ITEM_ITEM_ID_FOR = MTRAN.ITEM_ITEM_ID_FOR),
    0) QTY_FARVARDIN,
    NVL((SELECT DISTINCT SUM(MTRAN1.QTY_PRIMARY_MTRAN)
    FROM M
    i have a view like above with 10 select to select on one table.
    this view take long time to execute ,how could i decrese this time!

    user498843 wrote:
    SELECT DISTINCT xxxx
    TO_CHAR(TRUNC(MTRAN.DAT_TRANSACTION_MTRAN), 'YYYY') DAT_TRANSACTION_MTRAN,
    NVL((SELECT DISTINCT SUM(MTRAN1.QTY_PRIMARY_MTRAN)
    FROM MAM_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS MTRAN1
    WHERE TO_CHAR(TRUNC(MTRAN1.DAT_TRANSACTION_MTRAN),
    'YYYY') =
    TO_CHAR(TRUNC(MTRAN.DAT_TRANSACTION_MTRAN),
    'YYYY')
    AND TO_CHAR(TRUNC(MTRAN1.DAT_TRANSACTION_MTRAN),
    'MM') = '01'
    AND MTRAN1.MTYP_TRANSACTION_TYPE_ID IN
    (41, 42, 43, 44, 45)
    AND MTRAN1.ITEM_ITEM_ID_FOR = MTRAN.ITEM_ITEM_ID_FOR),
    0) QTY_FARVARDIN,
    NVL((SELECT DISTINCT SUM(MTRAN1.QTY_PRIMARY_MTRAN)
    FROM M
    i have a view like above with 10 select to select on one table.
    this view take long time to execute ,how could i decrese this time!Thread: HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
    HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting

  • MVIEW refresh takes long time

    Materialized view takes long time to refresh but when i tried select & insert into table it's very fast.
    i executed SQL and it takes ust 1min ( total rows is 447 )
    but while i refresh the MVIEW it takes 1.5 hrs ( total rows is 447 )
    MVIEW configration :-
    CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW EVAL.EVALSEARCH_PRV_LWC
    TABLESPACE EVAL_T_S_01
    NOCACHE
    NOLOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
    NOPARALLEL
    BUILD DEFERRED
    REFRESH FORCE ON DEMAND
    WITH PRIMARY KEY
    Not sure why so much diffrence

    infant_raj wrote:
    Materialized view takes long time to refresh but when i tried select & insert into table it's very fast.
    i executed SQL and it takes ust 1min ( total rows is 447 )
    but while i refresh the MVIEW it takes 1.5 hrs ( total rows is 447 )A SELECT does a consistent read.
    A MV refresh does that and also writes database data.
    These are not the same thing and cannot be directly compared.
    So instead of pointing at the SELECT execution time and asking why the MV refresh is not as fast, look instead WHAT the refresh is doing and HOW it is doing that.
    Is the execution plan sane? What events are the top ones for the MV refresh? What are the wait states that contributes most to the processing time of the refresh?
    You cannot use the SELECT statement's execution time as a direct comparison metric. The work done by the refresh is more than the work done by the SELECT. You need to determine exactly what work is done by the refresh and whether that work is done in a reasonable time, and how other sessions are impacting the refresh (it could very well be blocked by another session).

  • Takes Long time for Data Loading.

    Hi All,
    Good Morning.. I am new to SDN.
    Currently i am using the datasource 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H and it contains 225 fields. Currently i am using around 40 fields in my report.
    Can i hide the remaining fields in the datasource level itself (TCODE : RSA6)
    Currently data loading takes more time to load the data from PSA to ODS (ODS 1).
    And also right now i am pulling some data from another ODS(ODS 2)(LookUP). It takes long time to update the data in Active data table of the ODS.
    Can you please suggest how to improve the performance of dataloading on this Case.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Siva.

    Hi....
    Yes...u can hide..........just Check the hide box for those fields.......R u in BI 7.0 or BW...........whatever ........is the no of records is huge?
    If so u can split the records and execute............I mean use the same IP...........just execute it with different selections.........
    Check in ST04............is there are any locks or lockwaits..........if so...........Go to SM37 >> Check whether any Long running job is there or not.........then check whether that job is progressing or not............double click on the Job >> From the Job details copy the PID..............go to ST04 .....expand the node............and check whether u r able to find that PID there or not.........
    Also check System log in SM21............and shortdumps in ST04........
    Now to improve performance...........u can try to increase the virtual memory or servers.........if possiblr........it will increase the number of work process..........since if many jobs run at a time .then there will be no free Work prrocesses to proceed........
    Regards,
    Debjani......

  • The 0co_om_opa_6 ip in the process chains takes long time to run

    Hi experts,
    The 0co_om_opa_6 ip in the process chains takes long time to run around 5 hours in production
    I have checked the note 382329,
    -> where the indexes 1 and 4 are active
    -> index 4 was not "Index does not exist in database system ORACLE"- i have assgined to " Indexes on all database systems and ran the delta load in development system, but guess there are not much data in dev it took 2-1/2 hrs to run as it was taking earlier. so didnt find much differnce in performance.
    As per the note Note 549552 - CO line item extractors: performance, i have checked in the table BWOM_SETTINGS these are the settings that are there in the ECC system.
    -> OLTPSOURCE -  is blank
       PARAM_NAME - OBJSELSIZE
       PARAM_VALUE- is blank
    -> OLTPSOURCE - is blank
       PARAM_NAME - NOTSSELECT
       PARAM_VALUE- is blank
    -> OLTPSOURCE- 0CO_OM_OPA_6
       PARAM_NAME - NOBLOCKING
       PARAM_VALUE- is blank.
    Could you please check if any other settings needs to be done .
    Also for the IP there is selction criteris for FISCALYEAR/PERIOD from 2004-2099, also an inti is done for the same period as a result it becoming difficult for me to load for a single year.
    Please suggest.

    The problem was the index 4 was not active in the database level..it was recommended by the SAP team to activate it in se14..however while doing so we face few issues se14 is a very sensitive transaction should be handled carefully ... it should be activate not created.
    The OBJSELSIZE in the table BWOM_SETTINGS has to be Marked 'X' to improve the quality as well as the indexe 4 should be activate at the abap level i.e in the table COEP -> INDEXES-> INDEX 4 -> Select the  u201Cindex on all database systemu201D in place of u201CNo database indexu201D, once it is activated in the table abap level you can activate the same indexes in the database level.
    Be very carefull while you execute it in se14 best is to use db02 to do the same , basis tend to make less mistake there.
    Thanks Hope this helps ..

  • DSO activation in Process Chains - takes long time

    Dear All,
    We have included DSO activation in Process Chains. This process takes a long time to execute. We manually cancel the corresponding process in Process Overview and repeat it from chain. The chain runs daily and this issue also occurs on a daily basis.
    Does anyone one of you have an idea of how to deal with this performance issue?
    Regards.

    Figure out in which class does your process fall in:
    Class A- High Priority
    Class B- Medium Priority
    Class C- Least Priority
    Background processes
    Class A jobs
    The number of work processes reserved for job class A is a subset of the number of background processes.
    You should only reserve work processes for job class A if it makes sense within your system organization. Work processes reserved for class A jobs are no longer available for job classes B or C.
    Set parallel processing for a specific BW process in the (variant) maintenance of the process
    Call the function for setting the parallel processes.
    You can call the function in the process variant maintenance of a process chain or in the process maintenance. The function call varies for the different BW processes.
    For example, in the data transfer process you call the function with Goto-->  Background Manager Settings.
    The Settings for Parallel Processing dialog box appears
      Under Number of Processes, define the maximum number of work processes that should be used to process the BW process.
    If you enter 1, the BW process is processed serially.
    If you enter a number greater than 1, the BW process is processed in parallel
    In the Parallel Processing group frame, make the relevant settings for parallel processing in the background:
    Enter a job class for defining the job priority.
    The job priority defines how the jobs are distributed among the available background work processes
      In the group frame Parallel Processing, you can define whether parallel processing should take place in dialog work processes or in background work processes for the processes ODSACTIVAT, ODSSID and ODSREQUDEL for the DataStore object
    Transport:
    The entries in tables RSBATCHPARALLEL and RSBATCHSERVER are written on a transport request of the Change and Transport System.
    Edited by: ram.pch on Oct 7, 2011 9:55 PM

  • Taking long time to execute views

    Hi All,
    my query is taking long time to execute(i am using standard views in my query)
    XLA_INV_AEL_GL_V , XLA_WIP_AEL_GL_V -----these standard views itself taking long time to execute ,but i need the info from this views
    WHERE gjh.je_batch_id = gjb.je_batch_id AND
    gjh.je_header_id = gjl.je_header_id AND
    gjh.je_header_id = xlawip.je_header_id AND
    gjl.je_header_id = xlawip.je_header_id AND
    gjl.je_line_num = xlawip.je_line_num AND
    gcc.code_combination_id = gjl.code_combination_id AND
    gjl.code_combination_id = xlawip.code_combination_id AND
    gjb.set_of_books_id = xlawip.set_of_books_id AND
    gjh.je_source = 'Inventory' AND
    gjh.je_category = 'WIP' AND
    gp.period_set_name = 'Accounting' AND
    gp.period_name = gjl.period_name AND
    gp.period_name = gjh.period_name AND
    gp.start_date +1 between to_date(startdate,'DD-MON-YY') AND
    to_date(enddate,'DD-MON-YY') AND
    gjh.status =nvl(lstatus,gjh.status)
    Could any one help me to execute it fast?
    Thanks
    Madhu

    [url http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=501834&tstart=0]When your query takes too long...

  • Takes long time for shutdown after adding to domain

    Hi,
    Workstation OS - Window 7
    Domain Controller OS - Window server 2008 R2 standard
    Following thing i have measure with Stopwatch.
    1) When the laptop is in workgroup, it takes just 17 second for shutdown.
    2) when i added the same laptop in domain ( corp.abc.com ), now it takes 1minutes and 22 second for shutdown. ( it just show shutting down screen )
    Why the shutdown time increased so much?
    Do you have any idea?
    Note:- i have not make any changes in laptop, nor added any software. I have done the above testing because user start complaining that after putting laptop in domain it takes long time for shutdown. It's happening to all laptop where the OS is window 7
    There is no logoff scripts / gpo's as well as we don't have roaming profiles.
    Please advice.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Param
    www.paramgupta.blogspot.com

    Hi,
    To troubleshooting this issue, please install Windows Performance Tools (WPT) Kit. The Windows Performance Tools (WPT) Kit contains performance analysis tools, and is designed for analysis of a wide range of performance problems including application start
    times, boot issues, deferred procedure calls and interrupt activity (DPCs and ISRs), system responsiveness issues, application resource usage, and interrupt storms.
    To get the installer, you have to install the Windows 7 SDK.
    Microsoft Windows SDK for Windows 7 and .NET Framework 3.5 SP1
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=3138
    For shutdown tracing:
    Run command:
    xbootmgr -trace shutdown -noPrepReboot -traceFlags BASE+CSWITCH+DRIVERS+POWER -resultPath C:\TEMP
    Collect logs and post them for further troubleshooting.
    For more information please refer to following MS articles:
    Long Shutdown Time on Windows 7 Ultimate x64
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproperf/thread/11a42a93-efd2-4184-9ce8-bbc1438b7ea6
    Long shutdown time on Windows 7 64 bit laptop
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7itproperf/thread/4440fc6e-c81e-440c-9183-9b7e176729d2
    Lawrence
    TechNet Community Support

  • DATACOPY command takes long time

    Hi All,
    I am executing a calc script with only a DATACOPY command and it takes extraordinary time to complete.
    I have also added the below setting to the Essbase.cfg file
    SET COPYMISSINGBLOCK OFF
    as it allows DATACOPY to avoid creating #MISSING blocks during the copy of data from a dense dimension.
    But even then it takes a long time to execute.
    Can anyone help me on the above.
    Thanks in advance,
    Raja

    Syntax to write any setiing in Essbase.cfg is COPYMISSINGBLOCK OFF and if yoiu want set it in CALC script then use Set COPYMISSINGBLOCK OFF.
    Also don't forget to restart Essbase server once change any setting in Essbase.cfg to make this change in effect.

Maybe you are looking for

  • The contacts in the ear phone hole are not working anymore!

    I have a Movie IPOD...I guess 5th gen. Its about 3 years old, I take good care of it. I have my ear phones for when Im out of the car, and a cord for my car radio that plugs into the ear phone hole. Well all of a sudden the ear phone hole and its con

  • Disappointing quality when exporting to DVD - how do I improve this?

    Hi, I've spent quite a long time producing beautiful slideshows in iPhoto '08 - complete with soundtrack, Ken Burns affects and transitions. I wished to burn this slideshow to DVD, but I was extremely disappointed with the quality of the final result

  • TS1567 Why won't my iTunes connect with my iPhone?

    I have tried connecting iTunes to my iPhone using my USB and others USB and computer? Everything is updated to date, a friend also has this problem... What can I do?

  • Outrageously high broadband fee by monthly direct ...

    Confused by constant increases in Monthly Direct Debits, spoke with the indian helpdesk on numerous occasions over the past 12 months and to be honest I am outraged by the change of paying an increase in a Broadband Only option 3. Look if I take up a

  • How to create a backup for VISTA?

    I bought my computer one year ago. there was no CD/DVD included for the Vista operation system. Now my external heard drive died, I can't recover the information, where I had the backup. It wasn't me who did the backup the first time, so can I do a n