Process Form Validation in OIM11gR2

Hi,
I am trying to provision and AD group from OIM.
I created an RO(order by organization), Process FORM and PD. I am provisioning the AD group from organization manually by providing the values in the Process Form for Group Name, Group Types and other Fields.
I want to validate the data entered in Group name (Dont allow any special character or spaces).
How can I achieve this?
Thanks

That's a lot of code, and I don't care to read it all.
1) What is the error. Cut and past exact message.
2) Where do you put the Form.class file? It should be in
<TOMCAT-HOME>/webapps/<APP-NAME>/WEB-INF/classess/foo/

Similar Messages

Is there a way to bypass the form Validation

I'm getting really upset with the Coldfusion built-in form validation for any HTML formfield ending by _date , _required, _time and so on...
My application proposes to the users to create some Properties for an object and later on to modify the values for all these properties.
I've got a piece of code building dynamically some form fields named just like the properties (by a simple cfloop on a DB query getting the property list).
And a registering page to records the new value in the DB.
But it crashes onto the classical "
Form entries are incomplete or invalid.
I can't control what the users set as property name (one of them was Checklist_required).
Is there any way to prevent this error by disabling this auto validation ?
(I'd like to avoid having to rename any field dynamically created and rename any forms variables before registering them on the DB : it's just NO WAY for me to rename the properties created by the users)

Fober1, that's not how it works. It's pretty much the ultimate example of the disjoint between how HTML forms work and how the naive CFML Cfform / cfinput design wished they work.
When a request is being processed by the coldfusion server, it just looks at the list of FORM (POST) variable names (whether it came from cfform or not; URL/GET params are exempt), and for those with certain suffixes (_date, _required, etc.), and it assumes their existence is intended to request validation another field without that suffix. It doesn't actually know or care whether form submission, nor the HTML rendered in the user's browser, actually came from "cfform" or "cfinput". The composition of the request that comes in (when a user clicks on "submit", or a hacker uses any tool imaginable) is out of the server's hands. The cfform code is not used during form submission processing, because the receiving template (the form action="this_one.cfm") doesn't even have to be the same template that has the cfform in it. There could be multiple conflicting cfforms directing users to request the same template on a single site, with or without the validation, even without considering what a whole other person might decide to send to your server.
The fact that it can work as intended for a typical user is irrelevant, because the purpose of validation is to deal with the atypical situation. A malicious or merely mischievous user that wanted to circumvent the validation would simply modify a copy of the page to leave out the "validation request" fields. For the developer to truly validate the input, additional code must be written, making the feature not only inadequate, but a complete waste of time. There absolutely should be a way to disable it at worst; Ideally, it would be taken out of coldfusion completely. It's not only useless, it's a security risk, wooing programmers to write code that doesn't do what they think it does.
The error message it gives isn't so great, either, and it's a pity that it can't show more than one validation message at a time, either. If more than one input is invalid, you could end up going through one round after another of submit + back button.
edit: I forgot to add the other important reason that this feature should never have existed: It is a nuisance to everyone else who doesn't want to use it at all, too! Those suffixes simply couldn't have been a worse choice, colliding with probably thousands of peoples' variable names. Why not "*_cfval_date" "*_cfval_time" etc?

Submit by email not working as form validation failed.

Ive created a form with mulitple pages. Three pages require form validation.
Each page is a unique process so I'm trying to use the "Submit button" to only submit that
particular page. I've created dummy fields as defaults to cure the validation problem but
can't seem to get the e-mail button to work. I also created a email dummy button with the
scripting:
EmailSubmitButton.execEvent("click");
I did this to try to force the the form to be sumitted via PDF. I am a novice at this so please
help. I'd be happy to send the form as well for review

You may need to enable usage rights in your form. You must have version 8 to do this. Open the form in Acrobat Pro (not Livecycle), click on Advanced tab, then select "enable usage rights in Adobe Reader"

Form Validations

How to perform form validations in ADF. And also can i customize the behaviour of "Required" property of a UIComponent? I dont want alert boxes to be shown Can i change that?

you might want to think about using one of the popup LOV item types for your employee ID field. popup LOVs are great for cases where you don't want to weigh your page down w/large lists of values. about your validation, if you really want to do it client-side, then javascript's probably the way to go (search google for code). if you do that, though, let the record show that you'd have to fetch your valid values down to your page for your comparison logic, anyhow. i'd consider using a regular htmldb validation for your emp id field. you seemed concerned in your post with the page submission. i'm assuming that's because you didn't want processing to occur unless the validation passes. if that's the case, fear not, it's a simple matter to set your processing to occur only after your validations have passed. check out the available "Process Point"s and "Computation Point"s for htmldb Processes and Computations to see what i mean.
hope this helps,
raj

Pre-populate the process form as part of Role Alignment - Need suggestion

Hi,
As part of implementation we are going to take over the Provisioning of AD (Via Groups-->Access Policy) using OIM which was initially configured to provision manually. Now as part of migration we required to assign a base group to the users who has already AD reconciled resource (and align it with policy via SQL updates -->POL_key is process form, OIU_POLICY_BASED in OIU table). We are doing this as part of direct SQL updates. The other part of the requirement to align the process form values using the configured pre-populate adapters (for e.g. if the current value of any attribute is X and the prepopulate adapter suggest that it should be Y then the migration should also update this attribute.) We tried to use the prepopulateProcessForm API of tcFormInstanceOperationsIntf but it seems this is working only when the System Validation is in Pending state. The other option we are thinking of putting java code and then call the prepopulate adapter by passing each input params and updating tha value via API if any update is required. Just wondering if there is anything else we can use as part of bext practices. If anyone has done this kind of implemntation please let us know your inputs. Thanks

Hero,
You want to ...
1. create users
2. give them privileges
3. assign them to groups
4. assign a default groups to users
You will need to do this in the following sequence of steps...
1. Populate the user entries in OID, and assign the default group
2. Create the groups in OID and assign the users to them
3. Assign the appropriate portal privileges to the groups
For step 1 and 2, I'll have to refer you to the OID Administrator's Guide for Release 9.0.2.
This document contains a lot of good information, but in particular, you'll want to review Appendix I ...
"Migrating User Data from Application-Specific Repositories". This addresses the LDIF migration tool
and describes the schema elements needed for the IAS user accounts.
For step 3, the easiest way would be to assign the privileges to the groups through the user interface. Once the groups are defined
in OID, you can select them via the Portal UI to assign the portal privileges to them.
The proper place to locate portal instance-specific groups is under the portal instance group base, which is
cn=portal_groups, cn=groups, <subscriber_base>. The following white paper
may be helpful to understand the organization of the directory information tree.

OIM 11gR2 - unable to suppress display of iPlanet process form

OIM 11gR2 or 11.1.2
SJSDS Connector 9.0.4
I have configured the SJSDS connector, it resource, etc and am able to manually/directly provision iPlanet User to an OIM user through the identity interface.
I have configured the process form to pre-populate all necessary fields.
I have checked the Auto Save Form checkbox within the iPlanet User Process Definition.
It is my expectation that when an administrator directly assigns the resource to a user they will not be presented with the process form. However, when we directly assign the resource, the process form is displayed causing the administrator to submit the form.
I have double checked the documentation regarding Auto Save Form within the Developer's Guide for Oracle Identity Manager 11g Release 2 (11.1.2) - E27150-03 and the Oracle® Identity Manager Connector Guide for Sun Java System Directory Release 9.0.4 - E10446-12 and I believe my expectations are correct.
1) Has anyone successfully suppressed the process form while direct or manually provisioning SJSDS through the identity interface?
2) Could the Auto Save Form be only related to request-based provisioning?
Thank you in advance.

These are also good questions but I'll give details :-)
1) Does that make the "Auto Save Form" checkbox useless? -
NO, If you don't do this then your Provisioning will stuck into System Validation.
2) Can you "Auto Save" the Application Instance form?
NO, as per Oracle either hide these attributes or delete these attributes but there's no clean way to delete such things.
Question For You:
If you don't want to Auto Save your Application Instance Form then why did you create that.
Workaround:
If you don't want Application Instance then create one more Application Instance without any form

HCM Processes & Forms PD Backend Service

HCM Processes & Forms
SAP_PD service (OM New Position Object IT1000, New Org. Unit Object(IT1000) and Relations between Position & Org. Unit(IT1001-A003 and/or A012 )
--- OM Data Create Position Object and Create relation with already existing org. unit, process form shows u201CProcess Completedu201D. When I check transaction log t-code : slg1 " The number indicated is not in any valid external interval" and " S 30117940 not found"
This same case is working fine, if I removed the internal number range (just try), it is creating using SAP standard number range '5XXXXXXXX' , it has been created object 'S' and relation with 'S' - 'O'.
I have created the process form with the following cases with internal number range is working fine.
1) Create Position using SAP_PD standard OM service u2013only object
2) Create Org. Unit using SAP_PD Service -- only Object
3) Using exisiting Org. Unit and Exisiting Position create relation -- only relation.
I am working a requirement same as Process: HR_PD_CREATE_POSITION but no hope.
If anyone knows about the new object with relation, why internal number is not working or any configuration may I missed!!!
Thanks & Regards
SAMY
Edited by: Ranganathan Pazhanisamy on Feb 1, 2011 8:35 AM

Dear Sameer,
The note 1098009 - Limitations for Web Dynpro ABAP doesn't say anything that you can't do.
I made a brief analysis and didn't see any issue (regarding the note). Check it out in a more detailed manner to see if there isn't a limitation.
I hope this has been useful.
Kind Regards,
Maurício.

Assertion_Failed dump when accessing Design Time for Processes & Forms EP3

After exhausting SAP note searches and the SDN community forums, blogs & wiki searches, I decide to make my first SDN post:
After installing Enhancement Pack 3 to the base ECC 6.0, we got the Design Time for Processes & Forms node in the IMG under HR Administrative Services. I was able to get in to it the very first time without any issues; however once I selected one of the sample SAP processes, I received an "Assertion_Failed" dump in the section of code saying a referenced node must exist. In debugging, we did see a node that is referencing a node that does not exist, which is causing the dump. The dump occurs in CL_HRASR00_DT_OBJECT_BROWSER, Method ASSERT_OBJ_HIER_IS_CONSISTENT (line 71).
I now get this dump each time I try to execute the Design Time for Processes & Forms node in the IMG. Note: when accessing process the old way, there is no issue.
To me is seems like either EP3 was not installed completely, something went wrong in the activation of those business functions, or the copy of the sample forms from client 000 did not grab everything. In debugging, it appears that the missing reference node is related to some form scenario node. Also note that all the steps under Technical Settings were completed.
Has anyone seen this issue before?
Thanks for any help you can give. If I find the solution, I will post the answer here as well.
-Jeff Glynn
Edited by: Jeffrey Glynn on Oct 22, 2008 1:54 AM

Hi Jeff,
I believe we had the same issue here.
There is an SAP Note (below) for this. Please let me know if this works.
Note 1075650 - New Design Time tool Corrections for the dump
Note Language: English Version: 1 Validity: Valid from 18.07.2007
Summary
Symptom
Dump on executing the transaction HRASR_DT which starts the new design time
tool of the HR Administrative services
More Terms
Design time tool HRASR_DT HRadmin
Cause and Prerequisites
Solution
The solution to the dump occuring would be resolved by applying the SP
Alternately the dump can be
resolved by performing the following steps manually :
1.Start SE16 transaction
2.Give the table name as T5ASRDTOBJHIER and press RETURN key
3.Execute the Selection screen by pressing on F8 Key
4.Select the following entries:
i. OBJECT TYPE = PROCESS and NODE TYPE = PROC_REF_FSCN_DIRECT
ii.OBJECT TYPE = PROCESS and NODE TYPE = PROC_REF_FSCN_DIRECT_START
5. Click on EDIT entries button on the header
6. Enter in the field REF_OBJECT_TYPE the value as FORM_SCENARIO
7. Click on the Next button on the header bar to navigate to the next entry
8. Repeat Step 6 for this entry also
9. Save the modification
Additionaly, perform the following steps as well:
1.Start SE16 transaction
2.Give the table name as T5ASRDTTOOLS and press RETURN key
3.Execute the Selection screen by pressing on F8 Key
4.Click on CREATE entry button on the header
5.Enter the following to create a new entry:
TOOL TYPE = FSCN_MSG_MAPPER
OPERATION = DISPEDIT
TOOL CLASSNAME = CL_HRASR00_DT_FST_MESSAGE_MAP
6. Enter the following to create a new entry:
TOOL TYPE = PROC_EXEC_FREQUENCY
OPERATION = DISPEDIT
TOOL CLASSNAME = CL_HRASR00_DT_PRT_EXEC_FREQ
7. Save the new entries
These adjustments should resolve the dumps hindering to start the new
design time tool

Captcha form validation ?

Hi -
Is there any plans to make the Captcha image form validator available for asp vbscript users as well?
Bjørn-T

Captcha is good until they hack around it. I had a form with Capthca that was being spam every other day. I came up with an additional steps in the form processing code to check for spam if they get pass Captcha.
1. Most spam has a link in the content. I coded a loop that checks each form field that checks for the string url.
foreach (string name in Request.Form.AllKeys)
                if (name != "submit")
                    value = Request.Form[name];
                    checkvalue(value);
    public void checkvalue(string somevalue)
                if (somevalue.IndexOf("[url=") != -1)
                    Response.Redirect("home.htm");
2. To catch spam without the string url. Most spam bots are dumb and they will place a value in every text in a form. So, I place a hidden field in the form that is blank. In the form processing code, I check to see if that hidden field is still blank. If the hidden field has a value, I redirect the bot.
            string hiddentext= Request.Form["hiddentext"];
            if (hiddentext.Length > 1)
                Response.Redirect("index.html");   //Wonder if I could redirect the bot to the FBI or cybercrime office
Results:
   This web site does not have anymore spam. This works great until the hackers figure it out. The example code is written in C#, but can easy rewritten in PHP or Classis ASP.
Note: the loop can be use to check for the bots that are trying to hack SQL databases by looking for the common SQL injections attacks strings like 'SET%20'.
David Pearson
www.saludalabs.com
www.workhorsecreative.net

How do I do form validation in dreamweaver cc 2014?

I understand spry validation has gone away. And I read somewhere it was replaced by jquery - but I'm not seeing that anywhere in cc 2014.

I use HTML5 forms now which contain a fair amount of built-in form validation. However, my main validation comes from PHP code in my form processing script. I can't emphasize this enough, the only reliable way to validate forms is with server-side code. Client-side validation (Spry, jQuery, etc..) is not 100% reliable because it uses JavaScript which can be turned off in browsers.
Sometimes I need to support older browsers that don't honor the required attribute in HTML5 forms. Bring out jQuery Validate. It's lightweight, simple, and offers site users a nice visual clue when a required field is missing. See example below. View source in browser to see the code.
HTML5 Form with jQuery Validation
All that said, jQuery validate is strictly cosmetic. The real work is done with PHP.
Nancy O.

Can't find jquery form validator in Behaviors as shown in video demo

I am on Win 8.1 using DW CC and am trying to add a validation script for my forms. According to the Video the New feature in DW CC has dropped the Spry scripts in favor of more standardized Jquery scripts for validation. Sounds great ...if they were there.... The Spry scripts are gone...but I can't find any Jquery replacements. This upgrade from 6 may have been a mistake.

Use an HTML5 form with the jQuery Validate like so:
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title> HTML5 Form with jQuery Validation</title>


<script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-latest.min.js">
</script>

<script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jquery.validate/1.11.1/jquery.validate.min.js">
</script>
<style>
    /**put this into your CSS Reset**/
    box-sizing: border-box;
    -moz-box-sizing: border-box;
    -webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
body {
    font-family: Segoe, "Segoe UI", "DejaVu Sans", "Trebuchet MS", Verdana, sans-serif;
    font-size: 100%;
/**BEGIN FORM STYLES**/
form {
    font-size: 14px;
    width: 880px; /**adjust width in %, px or em*/
    margin: 0 auto; /**adjust margins as needed*/
    background: #FFF;
    padding: 2%;
form fieldset {
    margin-bottom: 5px;
    background: #ADC9A5;
form legend {
display:block;
    padding: 8px;
    background: #537374;
    font-weight: bold;
    color: #FFF;
    line-height: 1.5;
/**wrap form lables and fields inside ordered lists for better web accessibility**/
form ol {
    list-style: none;
    margin: 0;
    padding: 0
form li {
    padding: 5px;
    margin: 0;
    clear: left;
form label {
    display: inline-block;
    float: left;
    line-height: 23px; /**lines up labels with fields**/
    width: 20%;
    font-size: 18px;
    text-align: right;
    margin-right: 10px; /*space between labels, fields*/
form textarea, form input:not([type="submit"]) {
    width: 45%; /**same width on input fields**/
    padding: 5px;
    color: #333;
    font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
    font-size: 18px;
    background: #F2F6DF;
/**radio buttons, checkboxes**/
form input[type=radio],
form input[type=checkbox] {
    width: 1.5em;
    height: 1.5em;
    vertical-align: middle;
    display:inline-block;
form select {
    width: 46.5%;
    background: #F2F6DF
/**field background on focus**/
form input:focus, form input:active,
form textarea:focus, form textarea:active,
form select:focus, form select:active { background-color: #DCEDBF; }
form label.error {
    line-height: 1.5em;
    color: #FF4E51;
    background: #E0E4D8;
    padding: 5px;
    font-size: 14px;
    font-weight: 600;
    box-shadow: 1px 2px 3px #333;
#submit {
    width: 25%;
    margin-left: 30%;
    height: 2.5em;
    font-size: 18px
</style>
</head>
<body>

<form action="path/your-form-processing-script.php" method="post">
<h2>HTML5 Form with jQuery Validation</h2>
<fieldset>
<legend>Required Fields:</legend>
<ol>
<li>
<label for="first_name">Name:</label>
<input name="first_name" type="text" autofocus required id="first_name" placeholder="First">
</li>
<li>
<label for="last_name">Last:</label>
<input name="last_name" id="last_name" type="text" required placeholder="Last">
</li>
<li>
<label for="e_mail">E-mail:</label>
<input name="e_mail" id="e_mail" type="email" required placeholder="[email protected]">
</li>
<li>
<label for="quantity">Quantity:</label>
<input name="quantity" type="number" required id="quantity" placeholder="Min 5" min="5">
</li>
</ol>
</fieldset>
<fieldset>
<legend>Select - Required:</legend>
<ol>
<li>
<label for="MySelect">Select One:</label>
<select name="MySelect" id="MySelect" size="4" required title="Please select something!">
<option value="1">Audi</option>
<option value="2">Saab</option>
<option value="3">Fiat</option>
<option value="4">BMW</option>
</select>
</li>
</ol>
</fieldset>
<fieldset>
<Legend>Radio buttons and Checkboxes - Required</Legend>
<ol>
<li>
<label>Gender:</label>
<label>
<input name="RadioGroup1" type="radio" required title="??" id="RadioGroup1_0" value="male">
Male</label>
<label>
<input type="radio" name="RadioGroup1" value="female" id="RadioGroup1_1">
Female</label>
</li>
<li>
<label>Select any:</label>
<label>
<input name="CheckboxGroup1" type="checkbox" required title="??" id="CheckboxGroup1_0" value="option1">
Option 1 </label>
<label>
<input type="checkbox" name="CheckboxGroup1" value="option2" id="CheckboxGroup1_1">
Option 2 </label>
<label>
<input type="checkbox" name="CheckboxGroup1" value="option3" id="CheckboxGroup1_2">
Option 3 </label>
</li>
</ol>
</fieldset>
<fieldset>
<legend>Optional Fields:</legend>
<ol>
<li>
<label for="phone">Phone:</label>
<input name="phone" id="phone" type="tel" placeholder="(area code) 123-4567" />
</li>
<li>
<label for="subject">Subject:</label>
<input name="subject" id="subject" type="text" />
</li>
<li>
<label for="message">Message:</label>
<textarea id="message" name="message" placeholder="remarks"></textarea>
</li>
<li>
<label for="submit"></label>
<input id="submit" name="submit" type="submit" value="SEND">
</li>
</ol>
</fieldset>
</form>


<script>
$(document).ready(function() {
    $("form").validate();
</script>
</body>
</html>
Nancy O.

Coldfusion form validation: Changing the "Subject" of an email based on server date/time

Hi,
I've provided a basic coldfusion email template for you to
edit if necessary.
In my validation I'd like to check the date / time on the
server.
If the date entered into the form is within 24 hours of the
server date / time then insert "Urgent" into the subject of the
email.
Along with that I'd like to add a "read reciept to my email"
if thats possible.
Any ideas?

<cfparam name="FORM.FirstName" default="">
<cfparam name="FORM.LastName" default="">
<cfparam name="FORM.Email" default="">
<cfparam name="FORM.Phone" default="">
<cfparam name="FORM.Comments" default="">
<cfparam name="FORM.Action" default="">
<cfparam name="URL.Msg" default="">
<cfset VARIABLES.Msg="#URL.Msg#">
<cfif VARIABLES.Msg is "" and FORM.Action is "Submit">

<cfif Trim(FORM.FirstName) is "">
<cfset VARIABLES.Msg=VARIABLES.Msg & "<li>You
must enter your first name</li>">
</cfif>
<cfif Trim(FORM.LastName) is "">
<cfset VARIABLES.Msg=VARIABLES.Msg & "<li>You
must enter your last name</li>">
</cfif>
<cfif Trim(FORM.Email) is "">
<cfset VARIABLES.Msg=VARIABLES.Msg & "<li>You
must enter your Email Address</li>">
</cfif>
<cfif Trim(FORM.Phone) is "">
<cfset VARIABLES.Msg=VARIABLES.Msg & "<li>You
must enter your Phone Number</li>">
</cfif>
<cfif Trim(FORM.Comments) is "">
<cfset VARIABLES.Msg=VARIABLES.Msg & "<li>You
must describe your query</li>">
</cfif>

<cfmail to="[email protected]"
cc="#FORM.Email#"
from="SENDER"
subject="SUBJECT" type="html">
Dear #FirstName# The Following details have been processed:
#Form.FirstName# #Form.LastName# #Form.Phone# #Form.Email#
#Form.Comments#
</cfmail>
<cfif VARIABLES.Msg is "">

<cflocation
url="baseform.cfm?Msg=#URLEncodedFormat('Information validated
& posted - Thank you!')#" addtoken="No">
</cfif>
</cfif>

<cfoutput>
<cfif VARIABLES.Msg is not "">
<ul>
#VARIABLES.Msg#
</ul>
</cfif>
<form action="baseform.cfm" method="POST"
enctype="multipart/form-data">
<table cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" border="0"
class="form_table">
<tr>
<th>* First Name:</th>
<td><input type="text" class="inputbox"
name="FirstName" message="" validateat="onServer"
value="#FORM.FirstName#" size="30"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>* Last Name:</th>
<td><input type="text" class="inputbox"
name="LastName" message="" validateat="onServer"
value="#FORM.LastName#" size="30"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>* Phone:</th>
<td><input type="text" class="inputbox"
name="Phone" message="" validateat="onServer" value="#FORM.Phone#"
size="20"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>* Email:</th>
<td><input type="text" class="inputbox"
name="Email" message="" validateat="onServer" value="#FORM.Email#"
size="30"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Required Date:</th>
<td><input type="text" id="SdDays" name="SdDays"
value="" size="4" maxlength="2" class="inputbox">
<input type="text" id="SdMonths" name="SdMonths" value=""
size="4" maxlength="2" class="inputbox">
<input type="text" id="SdYears" name="SdYears" value=""
size="6" maxlength="4" class="inputbox">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>* Query:</th>
<td><textarea name="Comments" class="inputbox"
cols="40" rows="6" validateat="OnServer" message=""
tooltip="tooltip in here" enabled="yes"
value="#FORM.Comments#"></textarea></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td><input type="submit" name="Action" id="Submit"
value="Submit">
<input type="reset" value="Reset" id="Reset">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</form>
</cfoutput>

Any progress?

HTML 5 Contact Form "Placeholder" instead of label makes form validation not work

Hi,
I am trying to implement a HTML 5 contact form which uses a "placeholder" within the field instead of a label. But now the form validation does not work.
The site is at http://www.partnerrealestate.ch/avenuedefrance23/index.html and it is not using any workflows from BC as the person receiving it is an external person and the process does not require a workflow.
Would appreciate any input into this.
Kindest Regards,
corina

There is no label on input fields. The form does not work because you have edited the names. BC needs the ID and names to be as it is issue when you create the form so it knows what to use for the validation and what information to pass into the database.
So where you have edited these, you need to restore those.
You have some invalid html on some input's as well one has input="" inside of it when rendered so that is not right.
It is not to do with placeholder use. So fix up your HTML errors, correct the name and ID changes and it will work fine.

Error While updating Process form data Using Scheduler

Hi All,
I am trying to update Process form data (ex : lastname) using a scheduled task Code. I am getting Error while updating Field.
Code :
HashMap<String, String> map = new HashMap<String, String>();
map.put("UD_EBS_PF_LASTNAME", "lastname");
formintf.setProcessFormData(instancekey, map); //I AM GETTING AT THIS LINE
Saying
Thor.API.Exceptions.tcAPIException: The following required fields have not been given values:EBS IT Resource : The following required fields have not been given values:EBS IT Resource
    at weblogic.rjvm.ResponseImpl.unmarshalReturn(ResponseImpl.java:234)
    at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableRemoteRef.invoke(ClusterableRemoteRef.java:348)
    at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableRemoteRef.invoke(ClusterableRemoteRef.java:259)
    at Thor.API.Operations.tcFormInstanceOperationsIntfEJB_h6wb8n_tcFormInstanceOperationsIntfRemoteImpl_1036_WLStub.setProcessFormDatax(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.RemoteBusinessIntfProxy.invoke(RemoteBusinessIntfProxy.java:85)
    at $Proxy2.setProcessFormDatax(Unknown Source)
    at Thor.API.Operations.tcFormInstanceOperationsIntfDelegate.setProcessFormData(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
    at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler$1.run(SecurityInvocationHandler.java:68)
    at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
    at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
    at weblogic.security.Security.runAs(Security.java:41)
    at Thor.API.Security.LoginHandler.weblogicLoginSession.runAs(weblogicLoginSession.java:52)
    at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler.invoke(SecurityInvocationHandler.java:79)
    at $Proxy3.setProcessFormData(Unknown Source)
    at com.wyndham.tasks.AssignRandomPasswordToAllUsersSchedulerTest.execute(AssignRandomPasswordToAllUsersSchedulerTest.java:182)
    at com.wyndham.tasks.AssignRandomPasswordToAllUsersSchedulerTest.main(AssignRandomPasswordToAllUsersSchedulerTest.java:63)
Caused by: Thor.API.Exceptions.tcAPIException: The following required fields have not been given values:EBS IT Resource : The following required fields have not been given values:EBS IT Resource
    at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.tcFormInstanceOperationsBean.setProcessFormData(tcFormInstanceOperationsBean.java:761)
    at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.tcFormInstanceOperationsBean.setProcessFormData(tcFormInstanceOperationsBean.java:426)
    at Thor.API.Operations.tcFormInstanceOperationsIntfEJB.setProcessFormDatax(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)

Is that possible there was the field ZDATE in your form interface/ context and now it is not? I guess some source has changed so the field in the form (binding to the not existing field) cannot be processed. Otto

Tabular Form Validation not working in tabular form APEX 4.0

Hi,
I am using APEX 4.0. I have a tabular form with Tabular form validation done with it.
Item not null is the validation.. so if I dont type any value in the any of the fields in the tabular form and press the Submit button, the first time error is shown... but when I click the Submit button again, with still the empty rows the page is submitted.
How to resolve this issue?
Edited by: Suzi on Oct 5, 2010 11:13 AM

Look at this thread - Re: Validations of tabular forms in 4.0

Process Form Validation in OIM11gR2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for