Prodn Order not calculating OH at KGI2 and WIP at KKAX

I have created a prodn order and in the control TAB the RA key and OH key is attached . Iam not able to calculate the WIP and OH for the Order .
PLease help .
Nakul

Pl make sure you have maintained rate for actuals in overhead % (S_ALR_87008275)
Also check the base for OH calculation in costing sheet and confirm you have actual costs posted under corresponding cost elements.
Lastly make sure you have right period and fy when you run KGI2.
Same way for WIP makensure u have actual costs posted. Also verify whether you are getting any error log.
Find out whether this issue is with one of theorders or in general. Check config and master data accordingly.
Regards
Subodh

Similar Messages

  • Target Cost in Process Order not calculated

    Hello,
    In Process order, after deliver of FG the target cost is not getting calculated,
    Could you please help me why the target cost is not calculated in process order.
    I have configured all setting for WIP and Variance

    Hi,
    Target costs are only calculated after goods movements have occured on the order, the Target Costs are then calculated during the Variance calculation.
    Target costs will only be calculated after the first goods receipt has been posted to the order. Also you have to ensure that the information to calculate target costs exists on the system in particular in OKV6.
    This estimation is based on the customizing for the Target cost version in transaction OKV6 as in turn will the "real" calculation of the Target costs via the variance calculation.
    So in OKV6 the Target cost will be based on preliminary costing on the order, an alternative cost estimate or the current standard cost estimate. Importantly if the choosen option is not fulfilled e.g. no current standard cost estimate, the target costs will not be predicted or calculated.
    regards
    Waman

  • Target costs on Process orders not calculating

    Hi All,
    We have released standard costs for all the materials. We have also done Goods receipt for the process order but still the TARGET COSTS are not getting updated.
    Can some one tell is any specific config present for the same.
    We need to fix the process orders but how?
    Thanks,
    Hari

    Dear Harihara,
    <b>You must have all manufacturing master data associated with your manufactured material(s) set up.</b> This includes bills of material, work centres, routings, and activity prices. If you are charging overhead, you must also have maintained the costing sheet and the material master overhead key field.
    Hope this is helpful.
    Regards,
    Naveen.

  • Change history of work center in Prodn Order

    Hi All,
    We currently are changing the work center in prodn order via an ABAP program number of times based on various conditions. We would like to know the change history for the work center in prodn order. Is there any <b>transaction or report or function module </b> that we can run for a given prodn order to know these changes. This change info is not captured in AUFK or AFPO or AFKO or logs for Prodn Order.
    We have not activated audit trail for this. Please can anyone suggest a soln for this.
    Thanks

    Hi Bala,
    AFRV table contains  Confirmation pool information. But I am looking for change history for the work center in prodn order. Like after creating the prodn order u changed the work center and then again after release of prodn order u changed it to some other work center (for some particular business reason). I would like to see all this change history.
    Swapnil

  • EBP Orders not reaching to SAP R/3

    Hi All,
    I have an issue, EBP Order not reaching to R/3, and showing PO status as Error .
    I have checked all assignments (cost centre, vendor) are ok,
    Can any one suggest what it may be the problem for this?
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Krish

    Hi Please check the following....
    1) As mentioned by other users see if RZ20 is still showing an error for this PO.
    2) If the error is old, try to change the description of the PO and order to re-generate the error.
    3) Error in process usually is due to diferences in the way SRM and R/3 works. All budgeting and accounting is maintained in R/3 so SRM might not properly display a hard stop for those errors until handled by custom code. Similarly some changes to PO are not accepted on the R/3 side after the receipts are entered.
    Hope this helps.

  • Rework Production Order not able to confirm and no cost calculation

    Hi Guys,
    During rework production order confirmation system giving error message as below:
    [Item category 01001 not allowed in accounting transaction 0000/0001
    Message no. GLT2001
    Diagnosis
    The online document splitting is active in your system. Here, each document is assigned to a accounting transaction variant and each document row to an item category. You determine for each business transaction variant which item categories can or must be posted here.
    The following error occurred for the document you entered:
    Item category 01001 in accounting transaction 0000, variant 0001 is no allowed.
    System Response
    The document cannot be posted.
    Procedure
    Check the document entered, the derivation of the business transaction variant, the derivation of the item category, and the assignment of the item categories to the business transaction variant.
    Procedure for System Administration]
    This error relating to New G/L split functionality such as the document type and G/L accounts document type. Doc type is using as same as normal production order and normal production order confirmations and other activities are posted successfully. Iu2019m in a puzzle, regards to this behavior of rework order?
    Back ground for rework order:
    Rework order was created through trigger points.
    Rework order doesn't have any material, it has to pick and settle to original production order; the same was defined at re-work order settlement.
    Rework order not doing any cost calculations at production order level itu2019s giving a message as below:
    Object was not costed
    Message no. CK060
    Diagnosis
    The system could not find any entries that are relevant to costing.
    System Response
    The system did not cost the object.
    Procedure
    Check whether the following objects should be flagged as relevant to costing:
    - Items in the BOM
    - Display BOM
    - Operations in the routing
    - Control key in the routing
    1.  Look at the message log.
    2.  Check whether a quantity was specified in the confirmation.
    Will some one throw some light to come out from this situation and what I missed out and what need to be maintained exactly Plz.
    Thanks in advanceu2026Vyas

    Hi Mangalraj,
    Have check the BOM & Routing for Parent production order costing check box is for both. Coming to rework order doesn't have any material, though it has pulled the some material cost from parent production order. The same can see at production order costs>analysis, but where as costs>itemization not able to see and mesage issued like: object was not costed.
    as early mentioned, confirmation level same error.
    Hope this may give some idea on this case, thanks for your time on this.
    Looking forward some light.
    Thanks...Vyas

  • Tax And pricing not calculating automatically on Purchase Order

    Hi All,
    While creating a Purchase order the Taxes are not calculating automatically .We need to manually enter the Tax on the Purchase order .The quantity conversion is not flowing properly so it is effecting the invoice receipt (not distributing the tax  on the invoice.Can any one please tell me the problem or the configuration to check this issue .
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi
    Please check all these below setting.
    1) Which tax procedure using.
    If TAXINJ  - Then check tax code using FTXP for valid tax code which you are using in PO.
    2) If TAXINN then check FV13 - for key combination such as Vendor /Material/Plant or Tax classification or Tax code/Vendor.
    depending upon your are using.
    3) Check Tax code is assigned to co code in Logistics - General-Tax on Goods Movements-India Condition-Based Excise Determination-Assign Tax Code to Company Codes
    4) Check J1ID for material & Chapter ID, Vendor Excise details, Excise determination.
    Once all this is ok then tax value will flow in to PO.
    Regards
    Sudhir

  • Hidden Sort - Order by calculation that is not displayed

    Hi,
    I want to sort by the absolute value of a column, but do NOT want to display that absolute value. Rod West mentioned a 'hidden sort' in a previous post, but I can't find any way to do it.
    Is it possible? If it matters, the column in question is a calculation itself - the sum of 2 other columns.
    The worksheet is in Discoverer Desktop 10.1.2.
    Thanks in advance,
    Dawn

    Hey Dawn.
    The concept of the crosstab is that you cannot sort on a data column as you are presenting a 3d look at the data. So unlike a table, you may be seeing records from all over the table (ie: not concurrent records, etc.) and it's therefore more difficult (well it is for me anyway).
    So, first of all, if you want it to be a xtab, then fine.
    But you mentioned that if it was a table, then you are getting several lines for each customer - one for each order or return.
    So, if using a table - which will be easier for what you want to do IMO, let's see if you can rework it for that.
    Suppose for the first column you had the customer id.
    Then for the second column you wanted to display just the month for the data.
    Then for the third column, you had the total dollar order amount for that customer for the month. So for that item, could you not just display 'total dollar amount SUM'?
    Then for the fouth column, similarly could you not just display 'final sales amount SUM'.
    Then create a calculation on the fourth column such as: ABS(final sales amount SUM). But make sure the calculation is checked off to not display it.
    Then in the SORT, could you not sort by the calculation (hidden), month (GROUP SORT) and customer id (GROUP SORT),
    Something like that should be what it sounds like you're trying to accomplish.
    Makes sense?
    Russ

  • Interest not calculating on work orders

    Hello,
    We have an issue with interest calculation on work orders in the
    There is a work order on which monthly interest is
    not calculating any more even though there is balance left with the
    order.
    The interest got calculated till May,2011, but after that interest
    calculation got stopped.There is no investment profile is maintained in
    the WBS element to which this order is linked.
    Please advise.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Tapan Patro

    Hi,
    Check the change documnets (CN60) for the WBS to see if the interest profile was removed. If yes, populate the appropriate profile and try the interset calculation again for the WBS.
    regards
    Sreekanth

  • Depreciation not calculated and posted

    Dear All
    I have a problem. Actually we had a legacy data transfer last year in the month of March.
    All the  assets were posted to new company code  fronm the old company code by using an initial clearing account.
    the entries were done through f-02.
    My problem lies in the fact that 4 assets which were posted at that time are not functioning well.
    The balances got transfered as opening balances in Aw01n but there is no planned depreciation for them for the year 09-10.The amounts are coming as " zero" in the planned  depreciation tab.
    As a result of which my asset acquisition reports are not coming correct.
    I have figured out the diiferences..
    The differences are regarding these 4 assets only.
    Could any of you please help me in finding the reason why the depreciation is not calculated on these assets since April 2009 and how they are appearing "ZERO" in the acquistion report when there is a actual  balance in the asset
    Thanking you
    regards
    Ruby

    Hi
    I have checked the asset in the previous company code also.. All the parameters are same..plus in that company code the sysytem has shown the planneed depreciation too for all the assets.
    now I think the problem lies in the depreciation key or in some linking between depreciation key and the asset..
    have you any clue about the areas that needs to be checked for this sort of linkage?
    Plus there is no over charging of depreciation.... The system didnot calculate anything in the present company code.........
    Regards
    Ruby jamwal

  • After I updated lion to 10.7.4, app store does not recognize my ID APPLE and it unable to connect me to app store in order to update/download apps? What have I to do? I have the same problem with mac mini e mac book air. Please help me!

    After I updated lion to 10.7.4, app store does not recognize my ID APPLE and it unable to connect me to app store in order to update/download apps? What have I to do? I have the same problem with mac mini e mac book air. Please help me!

    Your advice did not help me. I also installed 10.7.4 combo but the situation is the same.
    my internet connection is ok, mail is ok, but app store after 3 resets does not recognize my ID and it says "connection is not possible". Why? I have the same problem in both my mac mini late 2009 and mac book air 2010? Is it a problem of 10.7.4 update? I have to solve this problem and how can i return to 10.7.3 if my last backup was not with 10.7.3???thank you for your kind collaboration...

  • Make-to-order. Requirement linked to Quotation and not to Sales Order

    After we have changed our Make-To-Order Materials from unvaluated sales order stock to valuated Sales Order Stock we do face a problem with the Requirement for those Sales Orders lines which are started with a Quotation. After running MRP a planned Order is created (ok) but the Planned Order is linked to the Quotation line and not to the Sales order line. When converting the Planned order to a Production order the AFPOD-KDAUF field is the number of the Quotation and unfortunately not the Sales Order number.
    The Quotation looks ok. Item category is AGN and Schedule line category is BN (no MRP). When converting the Quotation into a Sales Order the Item category change to TAN and schedule lin category is now CP.
    The copy rules QT -> OR (VTAA) shows copying requirement = 501 Schedule qty >0 and DataT = 201 General Schedule line Data
    Anyone got a clue about where to look? ¨
    Thanks in advance
    Ken

    Hi Guys
    Thanks for your proposals.
    The Materials involved are standard items (FINI -> NORM) and our Set-up with item category TAN works perfectly when we create a Sales Order without a Quotation first. And the way we solve the problem manually right now is to convert the Quotation and delete in line item and recreate them manually. 
    I found that if i delete the requirement type in the Quotation and then convert the Quotation into a Sales Order then the Planned with be linked to the Sales Order = perfect.
    Any other ideas
    Best
    Ken

  • I bought a used iPhone and found him email iCloud does not affect me so how can I deleted this email in order to use the device freely and privacy

    I bought a used iPhone and found him email iCloud does not affect me so how can I deleted this email in order to use the device freely and privacy
    help me please

    You can't. Return the phone for a refund, if you can, because without the previous owner's Apple ID/Password, you will not be able to re-activate the phone. It will be useless to you.
    Apple can't/won't help you with this.

  • Withholding tax not calculating in MIRO and calculating in F-43

    Hi,
    Whenever I am positng invoice thru F-43, Calculating withholding tax amount and generating seperate line item for that.
    But for same vendor after posting MM cycle( PO - GR -MIRO) and I am posting Invoice thru MIRO  WHT line item not generating while simulating and also after posting.
    Checks done :
    1. In vendor master data Liable check box is ticked and Tax codes are properly maintained.
    2. Minimun and maximum amounts checked.
    3.Base amounts checked.
    4. Formula for WHT checked
    5. I feel if these setting are not good,it should not post in F-43 also. But it is posting in F-43.
    Kinldy tell me any specific setting for calculating the WHT thru transaction MIRO
    Thanks in advance

    Shankar,
    Thanks for reply.
    If I don't put amount in the basic data tab( MIRO) then it does not allow to "simulate" or "Post". But here I can simulate and Post
    I check every thing in WHT Config but I could't found the solution.
    I want to tell another thing, we recently went to patch upgrade from Version 4.7 E  SP 22   to 4.7 E  SP30.
    My question, Is the pacth upgrade affects in anyway???
    If any suitable answer appreciatable.
    Thanks once again for your reply.

  • Interest calculation on due date and not on invoice

    Hello,
    Pls can some one let me how to start interest calculation on due date and not invoice date.
    In the interest calculation, T code FINT, the system calculates interest from invoice date till clearing date and not from due date till clearing date.
    BR,
    Zulfikar

    Hello,
    We have selected the Always calculate interest from net due date check box. but now when i run FINT transaction for a customer it is calculation interest from invoice date and not on due date. the item is already cleared.
    The scenarion is
    the net due date of the docuemnt is 30.07.2008 so the interest calculation should stard from 31.07.2008 till clearing date. but the interest calcualtion is starting from 01..07.2008 which is the invocie date.
    BR,
    Zulfikar

Maybe you are looking for

  • Creating white letterbox instead of black

    Hi All, when putting 16;9 into 4;3, the letterbox at the top and the bottom is black. Can someone tell me how to make it white? Thanks, Stan

  • Cannot start the j2ee engine

    hello. we are facing a problem with the J2EE engine of WAS. we stopped the server for some reasons and when trying to restart it, the server shows an error after loading the service manager ,in the server and the server is not getting connected.i am

  • Transactions within/across procedures

    Hi, I am new to oracle. I would like to know if a savepoint can be started at a higher level procedure, say proc_nestedlevel_0, and the same transaction continue down through lower level procedures proc_nestedlevel_1...2 . . .3 . . .proc_nestedlevel_

  • Advise creating HD slideshow

    I'm looking for the best method to create a slideshow that ends up in 16x9, without stretching the images, for viewing on a large LCD HD TV. Something tells me that I might need to begin by cropping the original images in pre-processing, but I'd sure

  • Display Track Info. When iTunes is minimized

    Is it possible to have iTunes display the track information for the currently playing song when it is minimized? Most players will allow this now. I would think that iTunes would to. Thanks for the help!   Windows XP Pro