Profile not generated after transport.

Hi All,
We are facing an issue in which I transported a role from DEV to PRODUCTION through Q.
Our role is generated in DEV......but not in Q and Production.
As per earlier posts in the forum,I checked table PRGN_CUST in the DEV and PROFILE_TRANSPORT value is  set to YES.
Also,the role was added to the transport only after profile was generated
Has anyone faced similar issues?
Peeyush.

Hi Piyeeush,
Did you found a solution to your problem? I have the same issue!
I've created a new role in Dev, created & generated the profile. Once role is transported in Quality, the profile is transported but with the status : Current version not generated.
the strangest part is that i didn't realize that directly... in the meanwhile, the role was already in used in production by a test user who didn't encountered any problem while testing!
basically, the role is now in production, used by one user who can execute all transaction listed in the role... but the profile isnt generated and the user comparison cannot be complete due to that.
any explanations?
maybe i should create a new topic tho

Similar Messages

  • Partner Profile not Generated

    hi! all
    Generating the Partner Profile Using BD64
    while generating received the message in Green for parameters: Partner (Sender, Receiver); Port (Zport); Outbound Parameter(Zsender).
    while checking in WE20 - Partner Profile ; Profile has been generated for the Reciver System with the created message type and port in Outbound parameter. But not generates the Inbound parameter.
    As like Profile has not generated for the Sender system.
    While testing the idoc using WE19 it says Profile not generated for Sender system
    whats the mistake i have done. How to correct it.
    Regards,
    Kv

    Hello,
    The distribution model view for which you are generating the partner profile (PP) check the sending & receiving logical systems (LS).
    if you want to generate the PP with inbound params you have to assign the your own LS as the receiver & not the sender.
    BR,
    Suhas
    PS: If this bothers you too much maintain the inbound params manually in WE20

  • Inspection lot not generated after goods reciept?

    Dear SAPIENTS,
    Inspection type 01,0101,08,89 and all activated in material master but then allso inspection lot not generated after goods reciept. Can anybody suggest here that what could be the reason.
    Regards,
    Kaushal Rai

    Hi Kaushal,
    For Inspection lot from GR, 01 Inspection type is enough.
    - Ensure 01 Insp type is active and Post to Inspection stock indicator is active for that inspection type.
    - Ensure the QM is active for 101 Movement type, SPRO>Quality Management>Quality Inspection>Inspection Lot Creation>Inspection for Goods Movements>Deactivate Quality Inspection for a Movement Type
    Regards,
    Keerthi.

  • Profile not generated

    Hi all,
    In transaction PFCG,I have copied a SAP standard role (SAP_BC_USR_CUA_SETUP_CLIENT) to Z_SAP_BC_USR_CUA_SETUP_CLIENT. But in the authorization tab, when I am trying to generate the profiles..it says profiles not generated and it also created a profile name. I have copied one SAP standard role similarly..it worked fine. Can any one please advise.
    Thanks in advance,
    Ram.

    I am sorry. Here is the link which I have gone through and solved my problem.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/52/67151e439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
    Thanks.

  • ADOBE FM not exist after transport

    Hi dears,
    I'm facing to a problem with an adobe form transport.
    In dev, adobe works fine. I've transported the adobe in acceptance, after the transport, I test the adobe.
    Transaction sfp, test button.
    So I reach the initial screen of FM module. The FM is called /1BCDWB/SM00000007 and when I execute it, I've a dump. It's say:
    Short text
        The function module is not active or contains no code.
    What happened?
        The function module "/1BCDWB/SM00000007" is called, but
        cannot be found in its function group.
        Error in the ABAP Application Program
        The current ABAP program "/1BCDWB/SM00000007============FT" had to be
         terminated because it has
        come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    I know that with smartforms sometimes we need to regenerate the SF after transport with the option in the menu generate.
    I go in form object menu Form Object (first one) and choose generate.
    I've the information message (in green):
    Unable to find include '/1BCDWB/LSM00000007U01
    and the FM is not yet avaible
    In dev this manipulation generate works fine but not needed.
    Su53 in acceptance is ok last authorization wheck was successful and adobe in acceptance (the form and interface with sfp) are ok.
    Any help is welcome
    Thx in advance
    Vincent

    Hi Vincent,
    Similar to SMARTFORMS in adobe forms also the FM have a different name in different systems.
    So wherever you are writing the code to call your adobe form call FM: FP_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME and get the fm name from there, replace your FM /1BCDWB/SM00000007 with the variable in which you are getting your Forms FM name.
    For example:
      CALL FUNCTION 'FP_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME'
        EXPORTING
          i_name     = <Your form name>
        IMPORTING
          e_funcname = lv_funcname.
      CALL FUNCTION lv_funcname
        EXPORTING
          git_item       = git_item
          gs_header      = gs_header
        EXCEPTIONS
          usage_error    = 1
          system_error   = 2
          internal_error = 3
          OTHERS         = 4.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
        MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
                WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
      ENDIF.
    Regards,
    Vaibhav

  • ALV Title Not Display after transporting the Programme from DeV to Qlty

    Hellow Experts,
    i developed one ALV report with two screens, i transported the report from Development server to Qulaity server.
    in Development server report are working fine  but in Qulaity server after transporting the TiTle of ALV not display , plz give me some hint , below is my code to display alv title
    DATA: alv_grid       TYPE REF TO cl_gui_alv_grid.
    DATA:alv_grid_ref type ref to CL_GUI_ALV_GRID.
    DATA: layout    TYPE lvc_s_layo.
    layout-grid_title = 'Daily Material Reports.' .
    DATA: fieldcat  TYPE lvc_t_fcat.
    I m using  ALL METHOD alv_grid->set_table_for_first_display method for display alv .
    Thanks,
    Regards
    Neha.

    Hi neha,
    use the sap/help link to solve your issue,
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/0a/b5533cd30911d2b467006094192fe3/content.htm]
    if not use the below example code ,
    Heading 3 :h3  Set the title of the grid
    Fill the grid_title field of structure lvc_s_layo.
    Note that the structure lvc_s_layo can be used for to customize the grid appearance in many ways.
    DATA:
    ALV control: Layout structure
    gs_layout TYPE lvc_s_layo.
    For example :
    Set grid title
    gs_layout-grid_title = 'Flights'.
    CALL METHOD go_grid->set_table_for_first_display
                EXPORTING
               i_structure_name = 'SFLIGHT'
    is_layout      =gs_layout*
               CHANGING 
              it_outtab   = gi_sflight.
    Regards,
    Saravana.S
    Edited by: saravanasap on Dec 21, 2011 8:13 AM

  • Hierarchy Analysis Authorization does not work after transport

    Hi Gurus,
    I am facing a issue in hierarchy analysis authorization in quality system but the same authorization works perfectly fine in development.
    All hierarchy authorizations works in Quality except for this one. I found one old sap note describing this as program error but this note is not applicable in BW 7.3.
    I have checked the table RSECVAL, RSECHIER and authorization is active so everything looks good. Please advise if anyone faced this issue after transporting hierarchy auths to other systems
    Regards,
    Salman

    Salman,
    What I understood from your description is that you have same role+AA in Dev and QA, which provides access in Dev for all the nodes for said hierarchy but in QA, same role+AA provides access to the same hierarchy for all the nodes but one. Try to create a ZTEST analysis authorization in QA itself with access for the problematic hierarchy node and see if it works ? This will rule out the case if there is a difference in hierarchy in DEV & QA.
    Regards,
    Shivraj Singh

  • Accounting Document not generated after Post goods issue in delivery order.

    Dear Experts
    Greeting of the daays,
    Need your help on below issue.
    After making the post goods issue ,the system is not making the accounting document.
    The error given by the system is as follows:
    Material document 12365 does not include an accounting document
    Diagnosis
    The system cannot find an accounting document for the material document 12365.
    Possible reasons for this are:
    The goods movement has no relevance to accounting. Therefore, the system did not generate an accounting document for the material document.
    The material document is a document that was posted before Release 2.1. Such documents must be converted so that the system can find the relevant accounting document.
    The procedure for the subsequent calculation of value is not active in your system. For further information, refer to the documentation on the program for valuating goods movements: RM07MWBU.
    __Solution what I tried to solve this issue ,but not successful.__
    __Solution 1- maintain OMS2__
    __Solution 2 - maintain OMJJ- movement type 601 - PRCTR is required entry.__
    __Solution 3 - price maintain is material master.__
    __Solution 4 - OBYC - BSX - 7920 - GLA/c  and GBB- VAX and VAY - 7920 GLA/c.__
    __Pls let me know if there is any confirgation is missing.__

    Hi
    Do this checks:
    In tcode OBYC check if you have the proper entries.
    Go to tcode OKB9 and do the settings for the G/L acc. that you have in OBYC.
    To populate PRCTR you can use OKB9 and you can check if you have values in MARC-PRCTR.
    I hope this helps you
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • Web template with HTML framset not working after transport

    Hi,
    I've built a frameset which consists of two web-templates (role-menu and content area) those two are combined together using plain HTML which does not acontain any web items (uploaded via WAD). This works fine in development. After transporting to our QA environment all the templates have been transported with concode 0, but the frameset does not get loaded. I always get an "Error loading template ...". The two templates which contain web items work fine when used stand-alone.
    When looking in transport connection I see the following message:
    "Object ZWF_WEB_FRAMESET (Web Template Name) could not be collected for object ()"
    I also see the same behavior on another transport of a template. Nine out of ten ar fine, but one, all are exact copies - only the query used is different, does not work either. The query that is used has been transported and is working.
    Has anybody an idea what could cause this?
    Is there a way to regenerate templates (like RSRT for queries) ?
    Thanks in advance
    Bernd Dümmel
    KODAK Stuttgart
      using ve created a

    Did you upload the video?
    Did you provide the correct path to your HTML object?

  • Changes in WAD are not reflecting after transport

    Moving thread to Business explorer
    Thank you
    Edited by: YJV on Dec 22, 2009 2:09 PM

    I just remembered a similar problem we had with reports. Changes weren't visible after transport, however, when we opened the report and saved it in the report designer, the changes were visible. It had something to do with authorisations, most users missed the authorisation to 'generate' the report which was needed after transport. Maybe you can try opening the template with a SAP_ALL user or something on production to see if it's related (or test again on QAS with a new template and a user with limited authorisations.
    Kind regards,
    Alex

  • RE : IDOCS did not Generate after payment run

    I have a unique issue.  After APP run (ACH) all accounting entries & payment document created corectly. However idoc's for 3 vendors did not generated. There is no issue with configuration as this is not a new vendor and every month payments made off automatically. Vendor complained non receipt of payment after 10 days  and I could not find the log for that day. Could anyone please give some hints what could have gone wrong if anyone is expereinced this issue. As I said earlier all config and set up are correct and infact after that one payment is made to that vendor.
    Thanks
    Ivan

    Hi,
    Once APP run completed, Vendor open items will be cleared.
    You have to create IDOC using WE19.
    Run the Idoc using AL11
    may be your problem will be solved
    Thanks
    Chandra

  • AWR snapsohots not generating after restart of the instance

    oracle : 10.2.0.3
    OS : Linux 64-bit
    Issue : AWR snapshots are being generated after restart of the instance.
    I restarted the instance at 31.01.2010 8 AM CST.
    SQL> select STARTUP_TIME from  v$instance;
    STARTUP_T
    31-JAN-10
    SQL> select max(begin_interval_time)   from DBA_HIST_SNAPSHOT
      2  /
    MAX(BEGIN_INTERVAL_TIME)
    31-JAN-10 08.00.04.996 AMto my surprise the AWR reports are not being generated from 8 AM till now 8PM.
    What could be the reason ? Do I need to do any thing manual initiation ?
    Edited by: [email protected] on Feb 1, 2010 8:41 AM

    SELECT STARTUP_TIME     FROM DBA_HIST_SNAPSHOT WHERE STARTUP_TIME > TRUNC(SYSDATE);
    post results from SQL above

  • Infotype not accesible after transporting to client 900

    I have created a new infotype 9000 which is a copy of infotype 0000 in client 100. it works fine in client 100 but while transporting to 400 and 900 it gives a warning message with return code 4 and the same infotype is not accesible in client 900.
    I have transported the infotype twice by creating new requests. As a last option I deleted the infotype and created it again. It works fine in client 100 but cannot be accessed in client 900 after transporting it.

    Ya I have defined the infotype characteristics and they are same as Infotype 0000. There is no error in client 100. I can save data in Infotype 9000 in client 100. Its the problem in client 900. The BASIS person who transported the request told me that while transporting he got a warning message with return code 4. And once its transported in 900 it gives the message 'No infotype exists for character string 9000 ' when accessed from t-code PA30. Its working perfectly fine in client 100.

  • How to Copy Roadmap using RMDEF, and NOT generate a transport

    We want to lock down our production environment from any configuration, but still be able to maintain our Roadmap, via RMDEF/RMAUTH, without generating any transports. Is this possible? Or must I always generate and push the transports from our development/configuration client to production?

    You need to read the error messages more closely:
    01652, 00000, "unable to extend temp segment by %s in tablespace %s"
    // *Cause:  Failed to allocate an extent for temp segment in tablespace.
    // *Action: Use ALTER TABLESPACE ADD DATAFILE statement to add one or more
    //         files to the tablespace indicated.
    01653, 00000, "unable to extend table %s.%s by %s in tablespace %s"
    // *Cause:  Failed to allocate an extent for table segment in tablespace.
    // *Action: Use ALTER TABLESPACE ADD DATAFILE statement to add one or more
    //         files to the tablespace indicated.When you do CREATE TABLE t AS SELECT ... Oracle initially creates the table as a temporary segment in the tablespace where the table will reside.
    The ORA-01652 indicates that there is not enough space in the table's tablespace (the table you are trying to create) to grow the table to the size required. It has nothing to do with your temporary tablespace.
    The ORA-01653 means that there is not enough space in the tablespace for an existing table to add another extent.
    In both cases, you need to add more space (either by adding new datafiles, or by extending the existing datafiles) to the table's tablespace (again, not the temp tablespace).
    Just a question. If updating the tables once a month takes too long, why not increase the frequency of updating the tables? If you are on 9i, you may also want to take a look at the mege command.
    TTFN
    John

  • /3M1 and /414 wage types not generated after maintaining IT0582 exemption

    Greetings,
    I am facing an issue while generating the Annual Medical Reimbursement Exemption wage type (/3M1) and Total Medical Exemption wage type (/414) for an employee. I have referred to previous threads pertaining to this issue and have accordingly performed the following steps in this regard so far:
    1. I am using the wage type 9MDR to pay the medical reimbursement amount to an employee through IT0014. Following is the screenshot of V_T7INT9 for this wage type:
    2. Following is the screenshot of V_T7INA9 for 9MDR wage type
    3. Following is the screenshot of V_512W_D in Evaluation Class 6 section for 9MDR wage type. As per the earlier threads on this topic, I initially maintained the value 10 (Medical Allowance) for Evaluation Class 6 for this wage type. But even in that case, the /3M1 and /414 wage types were not getting generated. As a result, I am maintaining the value 20 for Evaluation Class 6 for this wage type
    4. Following is the screenshot of IT582 in which I am maintaining a record in Subtype MDA for this employee:
    5. Similarly, following is the screenshot for IT0014 where I am maintaining the amount of Rs.1250 against 9MDR wage type for this employee:
    6. Subsequently, I am running the Payroll for this employee for April 2014. Following is the screenshot of EXM table which is the input for INMED function:
    7. Following is the output after the execution of INMED function. As we can see, /3M1 and /414 wage types are not generated:
    I would request the forum members to share their insights into possible reasons for this discrepancy.
    Thanks

    Hi
    I again checked the table V_T7INT9 table and found that the tax code SMED was assigned to another wage type 9MDA (Medical Allowance) which is used to pay Medical Allowance to employees through IT0008. Following is the screenshot of the same:
    I removed this entry and then executed the Payroll. Subsequently I found that the /3M1 and /414 wage types were getting generated. Following is the screenshot of the output after the processing of INMED function:
    Thanks for the responses.

Maybe you are looking for