Programmatically enabling tcp protocol for sql server

hi guys....
i have to manually enable tcp/ip protocol for sql server with jdbc...
is there any programmatical way..to do this...
it will be a great help...
help me out guys..
thanx in advance

Similar Messages

[Oracle][ODBC SQL Server Wire Protocol driver][SQL Server]Login failed for user 'RECOVER'

Hi,
We have exadata x3-2. I am seeing this error in alert log file frequently.
The db version: 11.2.0.3 On RAC on Linux 5.8 x86-64Bit
Errors in file /d01/oracle/TEST/11.2.0/admin/TEST1_dbtest/diag/rdbms/prod/TEST1/trace/TEST1_reco_11909.trc:
ORA-01017: invalid username/password; logon denied
[Oracle][ODBC SQL Server Wire Protocol driver][SQL Server]Login failed for user 'RECOVER'. {28000,NativeErr = 18456}
ORA-02063: preceding 2 lines from HIS_CUST
The file /d01/oracle/TEST/11.2.0/admin/TEST1_dbtest/diag/rdbms/prod/TEST1/trace/TEST1_reco_11909.trc
Contains many repeated lines like below
*** 2015-01-21 06:34:40.209
ERROR, tran=21.24.51311, session#=1, ose=0:
ORA-01017: invalid username/password; logon denied
[Oracle][ODBC SQL Server Wire Protocol driver][SQL Server]Login failed for user 'RECOVER'. {28000,NativeErr = 18456}
ORA-02063: preceding 2 lines from HIS_CUST
Could any please help why is this happening.
Thanks

Hi,
You have customers who are running distributed transactions using a gateway which need to be rolled back. However, the gateway has not been correctly configured for distributed transactions. To roll back a transaction on the SQL*Server database a connection is made as the user defined in the parameter HS_FDS_RECOVERY_ACCOUNT in the gateway init<sid>.ora file but this user has not been created in the SQL*Server database with the password defined in HS_FDS_RECOVERY_PWD. This user also needs to own the transaction log table.
I assume you are using the Database Gateway for SQL*Server (DG4MSQL) as the Database Gateway for ODBC (DG4ODBC) doesn't support distributed transaction.
If you have access to My Oracle Support have a look at this note -
How to Setup DG4MSQL to Use Distributed Transactions (Doc ID 227011.1)
Otherwise, check the Gateway documentation.
Regards,
Mike

HotFix4 for SQL Server 2005 doesn't work

I am having problems getting a machine running SQL Server 2008 R2 (Express) to connect to a SQL Server 2005 (Full Standard Edition) DB on another machine via the LAN. It times out when connecting from a C# application. SSMS on the SQL 2008 machine
connects fine, but SSMS on the 2005 machine (connecting to a copy of the same DB on the 2008 machine) says it isn't supported and I need a hotfix.
I downloaded the hotfix link from Microsoft, but when I paste it into the Browser I get a DNS name failure for the Hotfix4 server. I don't want to paste the full link here because it is not made public by MS and you need to request it. However, the
first part of the URL is: http://hotfix4.microsoft.com/SQL%20Server%202005...etc.
I have checked out all of the obvious things in both instances (2005 AND 2008)... Both instances are configured to accept remote connections, both have TCP/IP and named pipes protocols enabled, both are running fine for local connections, both have the SQL
Browser enabled and the Computer Browser Service running on the network.
As the hot fix doesn't install, I am kind of out of ideas.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Pete
I used to write COBOL... now I can do anything.

SQL 2005 is out of
mainstream support:
SQL Server
2005
SP4
04/12/2011
04/12/2016
Technical support continues till 04/12/2016, yet mainstream (hotfix) support ends as of 04/12/2011; options
for hotfix support after 04/12/2011:
ð  Continue
with self-help
ð  Upgrade
to the latest supported service pack for SQL Server 2005 or SQL Server 2008 or SQL Server 2008 R2
ð  Extended
hotfix support agreement
SP4 and CU3 are still available for download, if this helps...
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2507769
http://www.microsoft.com/en-US/download/details.aspx?id=7218
But you should update your SQL-Server..... SQL 2014 is the latest version

How to enable remote connections in SQL Server 2008

I'm trying to enable remote connections in SQL Server 2008 R2 as described in the following article. I see the error message at the top of the article.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/walzenbach/archive/2010/04/14/how-to-enable-remote-connections-in-sql-server-2008.aspx
One step in the article describes how to enable TCP/IP in Configuration Manager.  Specifically it says that
'SQL Server NETWORK Configuration' should have TCP/IP enabled.
The issue I've encountered is that my Configuration Manager
is different than what appears in the article. My Configuration Manager shows the following:
SQL Server 2005 Services
SQL Server 2005 Network Configuration (32 bit)
      - Protocols for SQLExpress
SQL Native Client Configuration (32 bit)
       - Client protocols
       - Aliases
Note that I see 'SQL Server 2005 Network Configuration'
rather than that for 2008. When 'Protocols for SQLExpress'
is expanded, there is a TCP/IP setting, but it's disabled and I see an
Access Denied message if I try to enable this.
I also see a TCP/IP setting under Client protocols and successfully enabled this. This uses port 1433 and I configured my firewall to accomodate this port as suggested in the article.
I also followed the other steps in the article, but still don't have remote access to SQL Server 2008 R2. (I can access it from the office.) I'm wondering if this remote access issue is because SQL Server
2008 Network Configuration does not appear in Configuration Manager
and if so, I'm interested in how this might be resolved. (I'm running Windows 7 - 64 bit.)
I'd appreciate any ideas on this. Thanks.

Hello,
Please refer to the following resource.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/KbView/914277
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alberto Morillo
SQLCoffee.com

Increase Performance and ROI for SQL Server Environments

May 2015
Explore
The Buzz from Microsoft Ignite 2015
NetApp was in full force at the recent Microsoft Ignite show in Chicago, talking about solutions for hybrid cloud, and our proven solutions for Microsoft SQL Server and other Microsoft applications.
Hot topics at the NetApp booth included:
OnCommand® Shift. A revolutionary technology that lets you move virtual machines back and forth between VMware and Hyper-V environments in minutes.
Azure Site Recovery to NetApp Private Storage. Replicate on-premises SAN-based applications to NPS for disaster recovery in the Azure cloud.
These tools give you greater flexibility for managing and protecting important business applications.
Chris Lemmons
Director, EIS Technical Marketing, NetApp
If your organization runs databases such as Microsoft SQL Server and Oracle DB, you probably know that these vendors primarily license their products on a "per-core" basis. Microsoft recently switched to "per-core" rather than "per-socket" licensing for SQL Server 2012 and 2014. This change can have a big impact on the total cost of operating a database, especially as core counts on new servers continue to climb. It turns out that the right storage infrastructure can drive down database costs, increase productivity, and put your infrastructure back in balance.
In many customer environments, NetApp has noticed that server CPU utilization is low—often on the order of just 20%. This is usually the result of I/O bottlenecks. Server cores have to sit and wait for I/O from hard disk drives (HDDs). We've been closely studying the impact of all-flash storage on SQL Server environments that use HDD-based storage systems. NetApp® All Flash FAS platform delivers world-class performance for SQL Server plus the storage efficiency, application integration, nondisruptive operations, and data protection of clustered Data ONTAP®, making it ideal for SQL Server environments.
Tests show that All Flash FAS can drive up IOPS and database server CPU utilization by as much as 4x. And with a 95% reduction in latency, you can achieve this level of performance with half as many servers. This reduces the number of servers you need and the number of cores you have to license, driving down costs by 50% or more and paying back your investment in flash in as little as six months.
Figure 1) NetApp All Flash FAS increases CPU utilization on your SQL Server database servers, lowering costs.
Source: NetApp, 2015
Whether you're running one of the newer versions of SQL Server or facing an upgrade of an earlier version, you can't afford not to take a second look at your storage environment.
End of Support for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 is Rapidly Approaching
Microsoft has set the end of extended support for SQL Server 2005 for April 2016—less than a year away. With support for Microsoft Windows 2003 ending in July 2015, time may already be running short.
If you're running Windows Server 2003, new server hardware is almost certainly needed when you upgrade SQL Server. Evaluate your server and storage options now to get costs under control.
Test Methodology
To test the impact of flash on SQL Server performance, we replaced a legacy HDD-based storage system with an All Flash FAS AFF8080 EX. The legacy system was configured with almost 150 HDDs, a typical configuration for HDD storage supporting SQL Server. The AFF8080 EX used just 48 SSDs.
Table 1) Components used in testing.
Test Configuration Components
Details
SQL Server 2014 servers
Fujitsu RX300
Server operating system
Microsoft Windows 2012 R2 Standard Edition
SQL Server database version
Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Enterprise Edition
Processors per server
2 6-core Xeon E5-2630 at 2.30 GHz
Fibre channel network
8Gb FC with multipathing
Storage controller
AFF8080 EX
Data ONTAP version
Clustered Data ONTAP® 8.3.1
Drive number and type
48 SSD
Source: NetApp, 2015
The test configuration consisted of 10 database servers connected through fibre channel to both the legacy storage system and the AFF8080 EX. Each of the 10 servers ran SQL Server 2014 Enterprise Edition.
The publicly available HammerDB workload generator was used to drive an OLTP-like workload simultaneously from each of the 10 database servers to storage. We first directed the workload to the legacy storage array to establish a baseline, increasing the load to the point where read latency consistently exceeded 20ms.
That workload was then directed at the AFF8080 EX. The change in storage resulted in an overall 20x reduction in read latency, a greater than 4x improvement in IOPS, and a greater than 4x improvement in database server CPU utilization.
Figure 2) NetApp All Flash FAS increases IOPS and server CPU utilization and lowers latency.
Source: NetApp, 2015
In other words, the database servers are able to process four times as many IOPS with dramatically lower latency. CPU utilization goes up accordingly because the servers are processing 4x the work per unit time.
The All Flash FAS system still had additional headroom under this load.
Calculating the Savings
Let's look at what this performance improvement means for the total cost of running SQL Server 2014 over a 3-year period. To do the analysis we used NetApp Realize, a storage modeling and financial analysis tool designed to help quantify the value of NetApp solutions and products. NetApp sales teams and partners use this tool to assist with return on investment (ROI) calculations.
The calculation includes the cost of the AFF8080 EX, eliminates the costs associated with the existing storage system, and cuts the total number of database servers from 10 to five. This reduces SQL Server licensing costs by 50%. The same workload was run with five servers and achieved the same results. ROI analysis is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2) ROI from replacing an HDD-based storage system with All Flash FAS, thereby cutting server and licensing costs in half.
Value
Analysis Results
ROI
65%
Net present value (NPV)
$950,000
Payback period
six months
Total cost reduction
More than $1 million saved over a 3-year analysis period compared to the legacy storage system
Savings on power, space, and administration
$40,000
Additional savings due to nondisruptive operations benefits (not included in ROI)
$90,000
Source: NetApp, 2015
The takeaway here is that you can replace your existing storage with All Flash FAS and get a big performance bump while substantially reducing your costs, with the majority of the savings derived from the reduction in SQL Server licensing costs.
Replace your existing storage with All Flash FAS and get a big performance bump while substantially reducing your costs.
Maximum SQL Server 2014 Performance
In addition to the ROI analysis, we also measured the maximum performance of the AFF8080 EX with SQL Server 2014. A load-generation tool was used to simulate an industry-standard TPC-E OLTP workload against an SQL Server 2014 test configuration.
A two-node AFF8080 EX achieved a maximum throughput of 322K IOPS at just over 1ms latency. For all points other than the maximum load point, latency was consistently under 1ms and remained under 0.8ms up to 180K IOPS.
Data Reduction and Storage Efficiency
In addition to performance testing, we looked at the overall storage efficiency savings of our SQL Server database implementation. The degree of compression that can be achieved is dependent on the actual data that is written and stored in the database. For this environment, inline compression was effective. Deduplication, as is often the case in database environments, provided little additional storage savings and was not enabled.
For the test data used in the maximum performance test, we measured a compression ratio of 1.5:1. We also tested inline compression on a production SQL Server 2014 data set to further validate these results and saw a 1.8:1 compression ratio.
Space-efficient NetApp Snapshot® copies provide additional storage efficiency benefits for database environments. Unlike snapshot methods that use copy-on-write, there is no performance penalty; unlike full mirror copies, NetApp Snapshot copies use storage space sparingly. Snapshot copies only consume a small amount of storage space for metadata and additional incremental space is consumed as block-level changes occur. In a typical real-world SQL Server deployment on NetApp storage, database volume Snapshot copies are made every two hours.
First introduced more than 10 years ago, NetApp FlexClone® technology also plays an important role in SQL Server environments. Clones are fully writable, and, similar to Snapshot copies, only consume incremental storage capacity. With FlexClone, you can create as many copies of production data as you need for development and test, reporting, and so on. Cloning is a great way to support the development and test work needed when upgrading from an earlier version of SQL Server. You'll sometimes see these types of capabilities referred to as "copy data management."
A Better Way to Run Enterprise Applications
The performance benefits that all-flash storage can deliver for database environments are significant: more IOPS, lower latency, and an end to near-constant performance tuning.
If you think the performance acceleration that comes with all-flash storage is cost prohibitive, think again. All Flash FAS doesn't just deliver a performance boost, it changes the economics of your operations, paying for itself with thousands in savings on licensing and server costs. In terms of dollars per IOPS, All Flash FAS is extremely economical relative to HDD.
And, because All Flash FAS runs NetApp clustered Data ONTAP, it delivers the most complete environment to support SQL Server and all your enterprise applications with capabilities that include comprehensive storage efficiency, integrated data protection, and deep integration for your applications.
For complete details on this testing look for NetApp TR-4303, which will be available in a few weeks. Stay tuned to Tech OnTap for more information as NetApp continues to run benchmarks with important server workloads including Oracle DB and server virtualization.
Learn more about NetApp solutions for SQL Server and NetApp All-flash solutions.
Quick Links
Tech OnTap Community
Archive
PDF

May 2015
Explore
The Buzz from Microsoft Ignite 2015
NetApp was in full force at the recent Microsoft Ignite show in Chicago, talking about solutions for hybrid cloud, and our proven solutions for Microsoft SQL Server and other Microsoft applications.
Hot topics at the NetApp booth included:
OnCommand® Shift. A revolutionary technology that lets you move virtual machines back and forth between VMware and Hyper-V environments in minutes.
Azure Site Recovery to NetApp Private Storage. Replicate on-premises SAN-based applications to NPS for disaster recovery in the Azure cloud.
These tools give you greater flexibility for managing and protecting important business applications.
Chris Lemmons
Director, EIS Technical Marketing, NetApp
If your organization runs databases such as Microsoft SQL Server and Oracle DB, you probably know that these vendors primarily license their products on a "per-core" basis. Microsoft recently switched to "per-core" rather than "per-socket" licensing for SQL Server 2012 and 2014. This change can have a big impact on the total cost of operating a database, especially as core counts on new servers continue to climb. It turns out that the right storage infrastructure can drive down database costs, increase productivity, and put your infrastructure back in balance.
In many customer environments, NetApp has noticed that server CPU utilization is low—often on the order of just 20%. This is usually the result of I/O bottlenecks. Server cores have to sit and wait for I/O from hard disk drives (HDDs). We've been closely studying the impact of all-flash storage on SQL Server environments that use HDD-based storage systems. NetApp® All Flash FAS platform delivers world-class performance for SQL Server plus the storage efficiency, application integration, nondisruptive operations, and data protection of clustered Data ONTAP®, making it ideal for SQL Server environments.
Tests show that All Flash FAS can drive up IOPS and database server CPU utilization by as much as 4x. And with a 95% reduction in latency, you can achieve this level of performance with half as many servers. This reduces the number of servers you need and the number of cores you have to license, driving down costs by 50% or more and paying back your investment in flash in as little as six months.
Figure 1) NetApp All Flash FAS increases CPU utilization on your SQL Server database servers, lowering costs.
Source: NetApp, 2015
Whether you're running one of the newer versions of SQL Server or facing an upgrade of an earlier version, you can't afford not to take a second look at your storage environment.
End of Support for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 is Rapidly Approaching
Microsoft has set the end of extended support for SQL Server 2005 for April 2016—less than a year away. With support for Microsoft Windows 2003 ending in July 2015, time may already be running short.
If you're running Windows Server 2003, new server hardware is almost certainly needed when you upgrade SQL Server. Evaluate your server and storage options now to get costs under control.
Test Methodology
To test the impact of flash on SQL Server performance, we replaced a legacy HDD-based storage system with an All Flash FAS AFF8080 EX. The legacy system was configured with almost 150 HDDs, a typical configuration for HDD storage supporting SQL Server. The AFF8080 EX used just 48 SSDs.
Table 1) Components used in testing.
Test Configuration Components
Details
SQL Server 2014 servers
Fujitsu RX300
Server operating system
Microsoft Windows 2012 R2 Standard Edition
SQL Server database version
Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Enterprise Edition
Processors per server
2 6-core Xeon E5-2630 at 2.30 GHz
Fibre channel network
8Gb FC with multipathing
Storage controller
AFF8080 EX
Data ONTAP version
Clustered Data ONTAP® 8.3.1
Drive number and type
48 SSD
Source: NetApp, 2015
The test configuration consisted of 10 database servers connected through fibre channel to both the legacy storage system and the AFF8080 EX. Each of the 10 servers ran SQL Server 2014 Enterprise Edition.
The publicly available HammerDB workload generator was used to drive an OLTP-like workload simultaneously from each of the 10 database servers to storage. We first directed the workload to the legacy storage array to establish a baseline, increasing the load to the point where read latency consistently exceeded 20ms.
That workload was then directed at the AFF8080 EX. The change in storage resulted in an overall 20x reduction in read latency, a greater than 4x improvement in IOPS, and a greater than 4x improvement in database server CPU utilization.
Figure 2) NetApp All Flash FAS increases IOPS and server CPU utilization and lowers latency.
Source: NetApp, 2015
In other words, the database servers are able to process four times as many IOPS with dramatically lower latency. CPU utilization goes up accordingly because the servers are processing 4x the work per unit time.
The All Flash FAS system still had additional headroom under this load.
Calculating the Savings
Let's look at what this performance improvement means for the total cost of running SQL Server 2014 over a 3-year period. To do the analysis we used NetApp Realize, a storage modeling and financial analysis tool designed to help quantify the value of NetApp solutions and products. NetApp sales teams and partners use this tool to assist with return on investment (ROI) calculations.
The calculation includes the cost of the AFF8080 EX, eliminates the costs associated with the existing storage system, and cuts the total number of database servers from 10 to five. This reduces SQL Server licensing costs by 50%. The same workload was run with five servers and achieved the same results. ROI analysis is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2) ROI from replacing an HDD-based storage system with All Flash FAS, thereby cutting server and licensing costs in half.
Value
Analysis Results
ROI
65%
Net present value (NPV)
$950,000
Payback period
six months
Total cost reduction
More than $1 million saved over a 3-year analysis period compared to the legacy storage system
Savings on power, space, and administration
$40,000
Additional savings due to nondisruptive operations benefits (not included in ROI)
$90,000
Source: NetApp, 2015
The takeaway here is that you can replace your existing storage with All Flash FAS and get a big performance bump while substantially reducing your costs, with the majority of the savings derived from the reduction in SQL Server licensing costs.
Replace your existing storage with All Flash FAS and get a big performance bump while substantially reducing your costs.
Maximum SQL Server 2014 Performance
In addition to the ROI analysis, we also measured the maximum performance of the AFF8080 EX with SQL Server 2014. A load-generation tool was used to simulate an industry-standard TPC-E OLTP workload against an SQL Server 2014 test configuration.
A two-node AFF8080 EX achieved a maximum throughput of 322K IOPS at just over 1ms latency. For all points other than the maximum load point, latency was consistently under 1ms and remained under 0.8ms up to 180K IOPS.
Data Reduction and Storage Efficiency
In addition to performance testing, we looked at the overall storage efficiency savings of our SQL Server database implementation. The degree of compression that can be achieved is dependent on the actual data that is written and stored in the database. For this environment, inline compression was effective. Deduplication, as is often the case in database environments, provided little additional storage savings and was not enabled.
For the test data used in the maximum performance test, we measured a compression ratio of 1.5:1. We also tested inline compression on a production SQL Server 2014 data set to further validate these results and saw a 1.8:1 compression ratio.
Space-efficient NetApp Snapshot® copies provide additional storage efficiency benefits for database environments. Unlike snapshot methods that use copy-on-write, there is no performance penalty; unlike full mirror copies, NetApp Snapshot copies use storage space sparingly. Snapshot copies only consume a small amount of storage space for metadata and additional incremental space is consumed as block-level changes occur. In a typical real-world SQL Server deployment on NetApp storage, database volume Snapshot copies are made every two hours.
First introduced more than 10 years ago, NetApp FlexClone® technology also plays an important role in SQL Server environments. Clones are fully writable, and, similar to Snapshot copies, only consume incremental storage capacity. With FlexClone, you can create as many copies of production data as you need for development and test, reporting, and so on. Cloning is a great way to support the development and test work needed when upgrading from an earlier version of SQL Server. You'll sometimes see these types of capabilities referred to as "copy data management."
A Better Way to Run Enterprise Applications
The performance benefits that all-flash storage can deliver for database environments are significant: more IOPS, lower latency, and an end to near-constant performance tuning.
If you think the performance acceleration that comes with all-flash storage is cost prohibitive, think again. All Flash FAS doesn't just deliver a performance boost, it changes the economics of your operations, paying for itself with thousands in savings on licensing and server costs. In terms of dollars per IOPS, All Flash FAS is extremely economical relative to HDD.
And, because All Flash FAS runs NetApp clustered Data ONTAP, it delivers the most complete environment to support SQL Server and all your enterprise applications with capabilities that include comprehensive storage efficiency, integrated data protection, and deep integration for your applications.
For complete details on this testing look for NetApp TR-4303, which will be available in a few weeks. Stay tuned to Tech OnTap for more information as NetApp continues to run benchmarks with important server workloads including Oracle DB and server virtualization.
Learn more about NetApp solutions for SQL Server and NetApp All-flash solutions.
Quick Links
Tech OnTap Community
Archive
PDF

Oracle 10g DB Export for SQL Server 2008

I'm having a hard time exporting my database Primavera P6 Project Management for SQL Server 2008, in fact I need to do this so I can export to a future program in Visual Studio 2010. But contiue with the Oracle Database Enabled
Thank you.
Edited by: 898987 on 25/11/2011 01:59

Hi,
Thanks for the translation.
You say you are having a hard time exporting my database Primavera P6 Project Management for SQL Server 2008. Could you give details of exactly what you are using for the export and what problems you are having ?
Is this an export from an Oracle database or a SQL*Server 2008 database ?
Regards,
Mike

SQL Server Usage Summary page, the count of user/device: does not show for SQL Server 2008

Does MAP tool capture User Summary (count of users, their details) for SQL Server 2008?
At my end, its working for SQL Server 2012 but not showing User Summary for SQL Server 2008..
Does the User Summary only works for SQL Server 2008 Enterprise edition as one of the thread points out?

This is from the
Wiki article:
SQL Server 2008 Enterprise and Datacenter Editions introduced audit event configuration for Windows security logging, which enabled SQL Server 2008 to log logon events to the Windows Security log. The table below shows which versions and editions have the Audit
feature that is needed to record the logon events. MAP cannot obtain user and device access information for any other editions or any older versions of SQL Server.
Datacenter
Enterprise
Business Intelligence
Standard
Workgroup
Web
Express
SQL Server 2008
N/A
Yes
N/A
No
No
No
No
SQL Server 2008 R2
Yes
Yes
N/A
No
No
No
No
SQL Server 2012
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
Yes
Yes
Please remember to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helps you, and to click
"Unmark as Answer" if a marked post does not actually answer your question. Please
VOTE as HELPFUL if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server 2012 Analysis Services Error Code = 0x80040E05

I've been running a package for 6 months without any issues that pulls data from a cube via MDX and moves it to a database.
We've recently moved to a new server x64 and the connections all succeed but at runtime (in 64 = T&F) I get the following error:
[SRC AdExchange [87]] Error: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_OLEDBERROR. An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80040E05.
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server 2012 Analysis Services." Hresult: 0x00000001 Description: "Error Code = 0x80040E05, External Code = 0x00000000:.".
[SSIS.Pipeline] Error: SRC AdExchange failed the pre-execute phase and returned error code 0xC0202009.
I've installed SQL_AS_OLEDB, SQL_AS_ADOMD from Microsoft® SQL Server® 2012 SP1 Feature Pack
Why is my connection failing?

The server has a 10Gbps network connection.
I've installed CU6 for SQL Server 2012 SP1
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2874879/en-us#hfi
I'm still getting the same error at runtime in BIDS:
[SRC AdExchange [87]] Error: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_OLEDBERROR. An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80040E05.
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server 2012 Analysis Services." Hresult: 0x00000001 Description: "Error Code = 0x80040E05, External Code = 0x00000000:.".
[SSIS.Pipeline] Error: SRC AdExchange failed the pre-execute phase and returned error code 0xC0202009.
Looking at the errorlog, everything looks normal until:
Launched startup procedure 'sp_ssis_startup'.
Attempting to load library 'xpsqlbot.dll' into memory. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
Using 'xpsqlbot.dll' version '2011.110.2100' to execute extended stored procedure 'xp_qv'. This is an informational message only; no user action is required.
Attempting to load library 'xpstar.dll' into memory. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
Using 'xpstar.dll' version '2011.110.3000' to execute extended stored procedure 'xp_instance_regread'. This is an informational message only; no user action is required.
Attempting to load library 'xplog70.dll' into memory. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
Using 'xplog70.dll' version '2011.110.2100' to execute extended stored procedure 'xp_msver'. This is an informational message only; no user action is required.
AppDomain 2 (SSISDB.dbo[runtime].1) created.
Unsafe assembly 'microsoft.sqlserver.integrationservices.server, version=11.0.0.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=89845dcd8080cc91, processorarchitecture=msil' loaded into appdomain 2 (SSISDB.dbo[runtime].1).
Unsafe assembly 'microsoft.sqlserver.integrationservices.server, version=11.0.0.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=89845dcd8080cc91, processorarchitecture=msil' loaded into appdomain 2 (SSISDB.dbo[runtime].1).
AppDomain 3 (master.sys[runtime].2) created.
Software Usage Metrics is enabled.
SQL Server is terminating because of a system shutdown. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
Service Broker manager has shut down.
Error: 17054, Severity: 16, State: 1.
The current event was not reported to the Windows Events log. Operating system error = (null). You may need to clear the Windows Events log if it is full.
.NET Framework runtime has been stopped.
SQL Trace was stopped due to server shutdown. Trace ID = '1'. This is an informational message only; no user action is required.
The SQL Server Network Interface library could not deregister the Service Principal Name (SPN) [ MSSQLSvc/XXXXXXXXXX.com ] for the SQL Server service. Error: 0xffffffff, state: 63. Administrator should deregister this SPN manually to avoid client authentication
errors.
The SQL Server Network Interface library could not deregister the Service Principal Name (SPN) [ MSSQLSvc/XXXXXXXXXX.com:1433 ] for the SQL Server service. Error: 0xffffffff, state: 63. Administrator should deregister this SPN manually to avoid client authentication
errors.
Wondering about the unsafe assembly in SSIS and deregistering the SPN..
Anyone have any ideas on how to resolve this?
Thanks!

BPA for SQL Server

Hi Experts,
Need to configure BPA 2008 R2 and 2012. Can you please help confirm if needed to run this tool for remote scan of SQL Servers,i.e install BPA on one central server and use it to scan the rest of the SQL servers in the environment, it is needed to run the
below metioned command on the remote servers through powershell :
1. Enable Remoting using "Enable-PSRemoting".
2. Configure MaxShellsPerUser using "winrm set winrm/config/winrs `@`{MaxShellsPerUser=`"10`"`}" .
a)Is there anything else needed to be done on the remote servers to allow BPA to run.
b)Does it differ operating system wise.
b)How do i reverse these commands after my scan is done.
Thanks

Hi,
The latest version of Best Practices Analyzer for SQL Server is SQL Server 2012 Best Practices Analyzer.
You can download it from
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=29302
I will update this thread when there is any update for SQL Server 2014 version.
Thanks.
Tracy Cai
TechNet Community Support

Creating a windows cluster 2012 for sql server 2012 clustered installation

Hello,
I am trying to create a windows cluster for sql server 2012 clustering on windows server 2012 R2 standard edition-64bit OS
when i perform the test after adding the cluster nodes i get this warning on networking.:Validate the servers can communicate
do i have to enable UDP port 1434?
I enabled ports 3343 on both the server but i still get the error.Please see the image below .Please suggest.
Thank you.
lucky

Do you have installed one SQL Server instance on the node?
http://blogs.technet.com/b/meamcs/archive/2013/02/15/sql-2012-failover-cluster-build-step-by-step-part-1-installing-sql-2012.aspx
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence

SSIS 2008 Logging - SSIS Log Provider for SQL Server

Simple SSIS package - copies a table from Server A to Server B.
Everything works except logging using SSIS Log Provider for SQL Server. Selecting the similar events to using
SSIS Log Provider for Text Files does generates a file on the server.
I specified server B on the configuration for SSIS Log Provider for SQL Server.
Logged on with a username with sysadmin rights on Server B. Executed the package using that login and nothing is written to msdb..sysssislog
any ideas what's going on or what am I doing wrong?

Just to be sure that the basics are right :
You sure that you configured the log provider correctly?
Selected the required 'components' on the left bar?
Selected events on the Details Tab?
selected the right table? I mean it should be --> select * from msdb..sysssislog
The default schema in your DB setup is dbo right? Coz, if not the logging will be a real problem. You might wanna recreate the table then ..
Btw, if you still experience issues, I'd advise you to enable all events and check for logging just to make sure that there isnt any prob with the DB setup ..
Do try and let us know :)
Edited:
Also a few more:
Check what database you chose in the connection setting page of the logging configuration wizard and check for entries in sysssislog of tht DB as, the sysssislog will be created only in that db.
Ensure that you have execute permission on sp_ssis_addlogentry in that particular db (mostly msdb). Can be checked via:
select name,
has_perms_by_name(name, 'OBJECT', 'EXECUTE') as has_execute
from msdb.sys.procedures
where name like 'sp_ssis_addlogentry' --for 2008 edition and up
or name like 'sp_dts_addlogentry' --for 2005 edition
Thanks to @Sathyanarrayanans for pointing this out :)
Hope this should help ..
Thanks, Jay <If the post was helpful mark as 'Helpful and if the post answered your query, mark as 'Answered'>

Creating ODBC DSN for SQL Server in LINUX

Hi All,
I am getting probelms in creating DSN for SQL server. I have created an entry in odbc.ini file under ODBC sources and provided the SQL server detiails as follows
[ODBC Data Sources]
AnalyticsWeb=Oracle BI Server
Cluster=Oracle BI Server
SSL_Sample=Oracle BI Server
SQL_DB=DataDirect 5.1 SQL Server Wire Protocol
[SQL_DB]
Driver=/u01/OracleBI/odbc/lib/SEmsss23.so
Description=DataDirect 5.1 SQL Server Wire Protocol
Address=172:16:1:169, 1433;
AlternateServers=
AnsiNPW=Yes
ConnectionRetryCount=0
ConnectionRetryDelay=3
Database=actdb/act7
LoadBalancing=0
LogonID=oracle
Password=tiger
QuoteID=No
ReportCodePageConversionErrors=0
When I test the connection ,i am getting the following error
+[nQSError: 16023] The ODBC function has returned an error. The database may not be available, or the network may be down.+
Can you please help in fixing this issue.I am not sure of the Drivers and the descrition that I am using are correct or not.
Please let me know the process of creating the DSN for SQL server in LINUX and also how can we check the available drivers in LINUX?
Thank You in advance,
S1r1

OBIEE does all of its data retrieval from the server. Your server needs to be able to query all of the data sources that you define.
The client is irrelevant here, it's just a web browser consuming data that the BI Server returns to it.
So yes you need to define connectivity from your Linux server to your SQL Server box.
The Systems Requirements doc (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10415_01/doc/bi.1013/e10417.pdf) details DataDirect ODBC drivers that are provided for non-Widows connectivity to SQL Server

Database Mail Fails For SQL Server Agent Jobs / Maintenace plans - Why ?

Database Mail Fails For SQL Server Agent Jobs / Maintenace plans - Why ?
This has been a very common question I have seen relatedt to Database mail and I thought will post here so if you run into this issue, it could be due to one of the following and also have mentioned below how to get around them. Bottom line is datbase mail works fine with SQL Agent jobs and maintenace plans in SP1 on all platforms.
1. If you see this on 64 bit platform and on RTM build, this is a bug that is addressed in SP1.
2. If you see the below error message, it is known issue and this is because of design that requires SQL Agent to restart, if SQL Agent was started before enabling databasemail and setting a new profile. We are evaluating to change this design of not requiring to restart agent for our future release.
Re: 264] An attempt was made to send an email when no email session has been established
This problem will go away after restarting SQL Server Agent in this case. Thanks,
Gops Dwarak, MSFT

This may be related to the fact that DBMail, by default, shuts itself down after 10 minutes of inactivty. If the mail service isn't running, you won't be able to queue up any mail messages.
There may be a built-in mechanism for addressing this problem, but I found that I can detect this situation and start the mail listener before sending db mail. I use the following in stored procs that need to send email.
You could increase the inactivity period for db mail shutdown from 600 seconds to some larger value.  It might not make sense to do so, since shutting it down releases its resources back to teh system; if your SQL server only sneds mail infrequently, it might be better to start the mail listener on demand. Someone with more experience than I might want to add their two cents' worth. :-)
/* Check the mail engine. Start the service if is is stopped         */
/* -- the DB Mail engine shuts down after 10 minutes (of inactivity) */
/* -- this setting can be changed, but we probably don't need to.    */
DECLARE @rc INT
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM msdb.sys.service_queues
               WHERE name = N'ExternalMailQueue' AND is_receive_enabled = 1)
    EXEC @rc = msdb.dbo.sysmail_start_sp
    -- TODO: add handling and logging for any engine start issues

Setup SSL for SQL Server 2014

I'm trying to get SSL setup for SQL Server. I'm assuming version doesn't matter. It's all about the same but I'm using 2014.
I have an Enterprise CA so I've setup certs through it. I've tried using several templates but none seem to work. I thought it might be needing to use a SAN cert but that doesn't seem to work either.
I create the cert, add it to the computer account.
Go to the properties of "Protocols for MSSQLSERVER" and change the settings on the cert tab to my cert.
Attempting to restart SQL Server fails. Once I clear the setting the service will start.
What am I missing?
David Jenkins

Hello,
Please read the following resources:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316898/en-us
http://thesqldude.com/2012/04/21/setting-up-ssl-encryption-for-sql-server-using-certificates-issues-tips-tricks/
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alberto Morillo
SQLCoffee.com

How to access the datasource window in SSRS for sql server 2008 R2 for writing my query without having to go through the wizard?

I have used SSRS a lot years ago with Sql Server 2000 and Sql Server 2005. I have written external assemblies, ... But now I have to do this with Sql Server 2008 (R2 -- which I realize I am way behind the times already but ...) in sql server 2000 and
2005 there was a tab for datasource to the left of the tab for design which was to the left of the preview tab. How do I get to the datasource window in sql server 2008 (r2) ?
I see that datasource explorer. But where can I get to the datasource window to edit my queries and so forth for sql server 2008 (R2)?
Thanks
Rich P

I think I found the answer to my question --- just right-click on the the Data Sources or Datasets for editing connections and dataset queries. I'm guessing it gets even fancier with Sql Svr 2012 - 2014. Man, that's the one thing
about coding platforms -- you let it go for a few years and come back, and everything has changed (well, a lot of things). Now I need to figure out how to add an external assembly to SSRS 2008 (R2).
Rich P

Programmatically enabling tcp protocol for sql server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for