Qosmio X500/02 - Question about partition

Hello Forum,
I have a just purchased a Qosmio X500/02 notebook and have noticed on one of the HDD, a partition having the specs. of
NTFS (System) Pri. Act. and a size of 1.465 GB.
Is this partition created in order to use the built-in backup and restore utility?
Regards JohnBoy_Oz

Hi buddy,
Normally you have at least two partitions on your notebook. The first partition contains the Windows installation from Toshiba with all drivers and tools.
The second partition contains a folder called HDDrecovery. These files are necessary for HDD recovery option to restore factory settings on your notebook.
Usually the first partition is called WINDOWS and the second one Data.
Does the partition that you mean contain a folder called HDDrecovery or not?
As Jeka wrote, create the Toshiba recovery disk as fast as possible. It can restore factory settings all the time.

Similar Messages

Re: Qosmio X500-12D - Question about display driver

Well I wanted best for my "pet", and I downloaded latest display drivers from Toshiba page first, then nvidia it self. What happens now, with any driver I have is next:
In dual display, when my desktop is extended to other LCD, clocks speeds of GPU CPU and Memory go to max, and heat up to 102C even if I stick in windows with no action at all even in power saving mode!
So my question is, can I correct this issue with nVidia control panel, or any older or newer drivers? Do you have problem like this? All you that have second display please try to extend desktop, and check with evga or gupz, temperatures.
I noticed that fan speed doesn't drop under 50%, and it is pretty loud for Power Saving mode, checked CPU, then GPU, and saw amazing thing max clocks + 102C
Thanks in advance.

Tell me your temperatures in idle, in dual monitor mode (if you have another monitor), or go to game or run FurMark and test it and let me know how high your temperatures go, try it out, you obviously don't play so you don't get driver display stopped working ... Guys I had Toshiba drivers and didn't work ... not anymore, well if hardware issue is here, I didn't do anything wrong ! 100% !
Well as I see there people have lots of problems, I will copy paste from another Toshiba post I made, I would be thankful if you test and answer to my questions:
Can somebody please tell me their temperature in C, idle and max load ! Please do next, download GPU-Z, go to sensors and read idle temperature, then go to dual display and leave it for 5-10 minutes and read temp then. It should be max.
I downloaded free benchmark program Ozone3D - FurMark, and I did test, extreme test last for 5 mins, 107C and my Qosmio shuts down !!!
Guys 100C in desktop while in dual display mode, and 107C probably in some games where it shuts down and on this benchmark, and remember I do have cooling pad with 2 140 mm vents it is summer, but it is around 24-25C in room, even over night it is colder it is 3 am, window opened (around 20C in room) still overheats ..
What I noticed it takes around 10-30 seconds to hop from 55C idle to 90-100C load ...
Please can somebody who thinks that doesn't have this problem let me know those answers:
1. Idle temperature
2. Load temperature of GPU
3. Drivers that you use for graphic card GTS 360M, if you don't have display driver stopped working problem !! And Dual display 100% problem
Thanks in advance.

Qosmio X500-11U- Question about new BIOS update

Hi to everyone
I need to clarify a matter, the BIOS update that was released December 2010 was the 2.90 now a new release march 2011 is named 1.40! Is this an upgrade a downgrade or a joke? Should I proceed with the newest 1.40 or stick with the old 2.90?
I forgot to mention that I own a X500-11U and thanks in advance

Hi nick73,
On Toshiba European driver download page there are two different versions available:
BIOS-Update 1.40-WIN for X500 PQX34E models
BIOS-Update 2.90-WIN for X500 PQX33E models
Your model the X500-11U belongs to PQX33E series and that means only BIOS Update 2.90 is compatible and 1.40 would be the wrong version.
So its not a joke and before you search for BIOS update next time, also use the correct part number ;)

Few questions about partitioning and formatting in Windows 8

Hello,
I'm very shortly after a Windows 8 reinstall and I want to make use of this moment to finally understand partitioning and formatting in Windows 8.
Before using Windows 8, I was an XP user for 5 years and I actually never bothered myself with formatting my main system partition, that's probably why my computer ended up working like a slime for the last years. Anyway, by now I have been using Windows 8 for a year.
Three weeks ago I faced a system-related problem with my laptop (IdeaPad Y580) which prevented it from peacefully shutting down. A good friend of mine (XP user for his entire life, and now Windows 7 newbie user) told me, that I should keep all my non-system stuff on separate partition and that I should do the main system partition format from time to time to keep my PC out of trouble. It is sure that he took his knowledge from using XP, and here's my first question - does this method apply to Windows 8?
I mean as far as I know, back then, in XP, partitioning was possible only during Windows installation, and now, in Windows 8 we have a Disk Management for this, which do not require running Windows installation to create new partitions.
I'm mentioning this due to the fact that originally (I mean by factory settings) my drive has only one visible partition - C: (1TB), so I would need to use the Disk Management to take some space from C: partition and allocate it to the new D: partition.
In case I do this whole partitioning operation and create a D: partition, is it sure that formatting my system-only C: partition won't have effects on my D: partition, and all the programms and data I have here will stay on their places and work after format? (I'm worried about this because I've seen in some partitioning guide a warning not to format the main partition after the partitioning operation, because it would erase totally all data - I'm not sure if I misunderstood something or is it a mistake? EDIT: here's the link for this guide, just jump to the "Final Thoughts" section to see what I'm taking about: http://www.technorms.com/8438/windows-8-create-hard-drive-partition ).
If this whole method of keeping your system running fine doesn't apply to Windows 8, I guess I'm okay with having only one C: partition.
By the way, it doesn't matter for me if I create new partition in terms of conflicts with preinstalled Lenovo OneKey Recovery, since I had to reinstall my Windows 8 recently from non-Lenovo CD, and either way my laptop is now totally clean, without Lenovo stuff (I found Lenovo Recovery CD for Y580 on the internet, but it had non-single-language Windows 8 in it, and I needed a single-laguage one in order to have my Product Key recognised, so I just used a pure Windows 8 SL installer)

I just found out that I can't even transfer my Users folder or Program Data to other drive than the one with the system, because it would prevent me from updating my system or even from actually booting to my system. So apparently my whole topic is for nothing... I guess I should live with only one drive, and whenever my system totally crashes again I should do the backups to my external HDD. It's sad though that Windows 8 is a total opposite to user-friendly OS, to say the least.

Questions about partitioning

Hey everyone,
I'm currently in the process of backing up my data, in order to completely redo my partitioning scheme. Right now I have the following scheme, ordered by their place in the disk:
/dev/sda5 -> 4 GB swap
/dev/sda7 -> 30 GB ext4 / for Linux 1
/dev/sda8 -> 30 GB ext4 / for Linux 2
/dev/sda6 -> the rest of the 500 GB disk, ext4 /home for both
I wanted to redo it to something like this:
/dev/sda5 -> 1 GB ext2, /boot
/dev/sda6 -> 4 GB swap
/dev/sda7 -> 200 GB ext4, to be mounted under /mnt/Files, and symlinked to ~/Documents, Music, etc.
/dev/sda8, sda9, sda10, etc. -> rest of the disk, ext4 / for various Linux and possibly BSD distros.
Is something like this correct and optimized? I see a lot of places recommending having a separate /boot partition, I'm going to give it a try. ext2 seems to be well regarded in this aspect, would I gain anything from making it ext4? Is 1 GB too large?
Regarding the order on the disk, should I have it like that, or maybe /boot, then /mnt/Files, then swap, then the OSs? What is a generally good order for this sort of stuff?
Cheers
EDIT: Forgot to mention: the layout posted above would all be on an extended partition, on /dev/sda1. Would I gain anything if I made any ot the partitions primary?
EDIT2: Also, should I look into LVM? Would it interest me?
Last edited by Blackened Justice (2012-02-14 01:03:51)

Hmm, I guess I planned on having a swap because it's customary, I thought it was pretty much standard I have 3 GB of RAM, and it does sometimes get a bit too filled up when I run certain VMs.
A question: Just how exactly would I have several distributions running from the same /boot? I have some knowledge of playing with grub's menu.lst, making it point to different kernels and such, but I've never tried to have different distros on the same /boot... Would I just rename the initramfs-linux.img, initramfs-linux-fallback.img and vmlinuz-linux to something different, and then adjust menu.lst accordingly? How about running different distros from the same kernel?

[SOLVED] A few questions about partitions

Hi,
I'm using Windows XP as my primary OS atm. Last year I installed Linux Mint and got it working nicely along with XP, but now I want to try Arch. I have two hard disks - a 320GB SATA2 one and a secondary 80GB IDE one. I've separated about 50GB of the largest for Mint, and I'd like to use these for Arch. Thing is, I'm not sure how I partitioned my HD (I think Mint automated most of it) and I'm scared that I'll screw up. I ran fdisk -l with the Arch CD as suggested by the Beginner's Guide, and here's more or less what I got:
Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 1 32059 257513886 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sdb2 32060 38913 55054755 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 32060 38627 52757428+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdb6 38628 38913 2297263+ 82 Linux swap/solaris
A few questions:
-> I assume sdb1 is where Windows is, and sdb2, 5 and 6 are Mint's. Is that correct? Why are there no sdb3 and 4?
-> If I understand it correctly, hdX means a partition in an IDE disk, and sdX means one in a SATA disk. Is that right? If so, why don't I have an hda (which would be the 80GB HD) partition, and why do I have sdbs instead of sdas?
-> When installing Arch, should I delete Mint's partitions and make new ones, or use the ones it already created?
-> If I decide to start using Arch as my primary OS in the future, will it be possible to resize its home partition?
Thank you very much and sorry for my cluelessness.
Last edited by Caio (2009-07-05 20:26:29)

Caio wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Windows XP as my primary OS atm. Last year I installed Linux Mint and got it working nicely along with XP, but now I want to try Arch. I have two hard disks - a 320GB SATA2 one and a secondary 80GB IDE one. I've separated about 50GB of the largest for Mint, and I'd like to use these for Arch. Thing is, I'm not sure how I partitioned my HD (I think Mint automated most of it) and I'm scared that I'll screw up. I ran fdisk -l with the Arch CD as suggested by the Beginner's Guide, and here's more or less what I got:
Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 1 32059 257513886 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sdb2 32060 38913 55054755 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 32060 38627 52757428+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdb6 38628 38913 2297263+ 82 Linux swap/solaris
A few questions:
Caio wrote:-> I assume sdb1 is where Windows is, and sdb2, 5 and 6 are Mint's. Is that correct? Why are there no sdb3 and 4?
My guess is because you made the second partion extended. normally 1,2,3,4 will be primary or one will be marked extended. It probably skipped 3 and 4 since you didn't create anymore primary partitions.
Caio wrote:-> If I understand it correctly, hdX means a partition in an IDE disk, and sdX means one in a SATA disk. Is that right? If so, why don't I have an hda (which would be the 80GB HD) partition, and why do I have sdbs instead of sdas?
With the new libata driver they all show up as sd?, so no this rule isn't correct.
Caio wrote:-> When installing Arch, should I delete Mint's partitions and make new ones, or use the ones it already created?
I would reformat the partitions, but if they are how you want them then you should just leave the partition table untouched. By reformat them I mean recreate the filesystem.
Caio wrote:
-> If I decide to start using Arch as my primary OS in the future, will it be possible to resize its home partition?
Thank you very much and sorry for my cluelessness.
It looks like you do not have a separate home partition. My guess is you have your windows partition, the extended, and then that is broken into one large partition for / and then swap at the end.
Edit: Oh I should have pointed out, normally arch creates a separate /home partition, if you want this you will have to restructure your extended partitions. This isn't necessary though, it's a preferance thing, there pros/cons to going either route.
Last edited by Zepp (2009-07-05 14:53:58)

Qosmio G40-10Z: Question about energy use in sleepmode

When I turn my new Qosmio G40-10Z in sleeping mode, with full battery (and off the AC power), I can't start the computer next day. I can only start it up after connecting it to AC power. I get a message windows Vista wasn't closed properly and I am asked to start in normal way or safe mode.
After starting the battery indicates only 2% power. So, what is using power in sleeping mode? Why isn't the sleep mode not transferred to hibernation state when the battery is almost empty?
(New notebook, only vista and office installed and only television antenna is connected)

Hello guys
At first I just want to write a little bit about theory. Microsoft has implemented standby/Hibernation mode to offer PC users comfortable OS usage and make switch ON/OFF time much shorter.
According to the definition standby mode should be used for short time (launch, meeting and if you must leave the notebook for few hours). Hibernation mode should be used if you leave the notebook over the night or maybe day or two. In standby mode all data will be written in RAM and to keep them notebook needs power. In Hibernation mode all data will be saved on to HDD and notebook can be switched OFF. In hibernation mode the notebook does not need permanent power supply.
For me it is really strange that you use standby mode with battery and almost 20 hours. With this I do not want to say that described battery issue is normal but for 20 hours it is logic to use hibernation mode.
Back to battery issue: only 20 hours under standby mode is really to short. I have tested it with my Tecra and after 5 days I was able to switch ON notebook as usual (only battery power supply.
In your case I see only two explanations:
1. Somehow notebook can not switch into standby mode properly and stays running (I do not believe this because you can see if something like this happen)
2. The battery is defective
What you should do is to contact Authorized service partner in your country. Make a call and explain the situation. Maybe you will get new battery or they should test it using your battery.
Sorry for this long posting. I wish you luck and hope you will clarify this issue very soon.
Bye and good luck!

Qosmio X300-14F - Question about illumination buttons and XP downgrade

Hello,
I've got 2 questions concerning the laptop I bought 3 weeks ago.
_*Question1*_
There are 9 buttons above the F-keys. They're being lit. In the beginning they all worked fine, but recently I've found that only the buttons designed to work in a mediaplayer work (meaning: pause/play, stop, previous, next). The other buttons (mediacenter, (un)mute, illumination on/off, webcam, DOLBY) refuse to do anything except for making beeping noises.
I'd like to be able to decide when to turn the illumination off/on without dragging the wireless flashcardsized-controller with me everywhere I go.
Any leads on how to solve this are welcome!
I tried this already:
Start > all programs > TOSHIBA > utilities > Toshiba Assist > optimize > Toshiba Button Support
But there's 2 problems with that. First of all I don't know where the executable is that dims/turns on the lighting. Second of all it still doesn't work for e.g. the dolby button. All it does is beep - loud.
_*Question2*_
I've been thinking about 'downgrading' from Windows Vista Home Premium to Windows XP since I'm tired of getting weekly BSODs and *daily* displaydriverfailures. I was concerned about not being able to find the drivers once I got XP on this laptop. I've looked on the official Toshiba website (this one :P), but there's only Windows Vista drivers?
Thanks in advance!

Hi
1) The program that turns on and off the illumination is called dimmer.exe. That you should find in the Toshiba folder (C:\program files\Toshiba).
If you assign this exe file with the button it should work again. If not, try to reinstall the Toshiba Value Added Package.
On the Dolby button its the same, you must assign the right .exe file with the key.
2) The point is that only Windows Vista is supported on this notebook and there are no XP drivers available. You can collect the drivers on external website but if you have problems with XP you should downgrade to Vista. The notebook is really fast enough for Vista. ;)

[Solved]Question about partitioning

Hi!
I`ve installed Arch, but made a bit of mistake when partitioning my HDD. I`ve made 4 primary partitions: swap, /, /var and /home. Now i`ve got ~200Ggb of free space left on my HDD, but i can`t create a partition, since the primary partition limit is reached. So i thought of deleting the /var partition ( only 7Ggb ), creating the extended partition on those 200Ggb, and creating three partitions there: two for my own needs and a /var partition. My question is: will Arch recognize the /var partition on the extended one as his own? Or will i mess things up?
Thanks in advance.
Last edited by K0tuk (2009-05-03 16:38:25)

K0tuk wrote:
Hi!
I`ve installed Arch, but made a bit of mistake when partitioning my HDD. I`ve made 4 primary partitions: swap, /, /var and /home. Now i`ve got ~200Ggb of free space left on my HDD, but i can`t create a partition, since the primary partition limit is reached. So i thought of deleting the /var partition ( only 7Ggb ),
why don't you simply extend your home partition with gparted?
K0tuk wrote:creating the extended partition on those 200Ggb, and creating three partitions there: two for my own needs and a /var partition. My question is: will Arch recognize the /var partition on the extended one as his own?
sure, if you make an entry in /etc/fstab. afaik, there is no user noticeable difference between primary/extended partitions (the differences are only of technical nature, eg you cannot make a extended swap partition).
wikipedia knows it all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_partitioning
vlad

A question about partition.

Dear All,
I am working with transparent partition recently. And I face a problem now.
There are three blocks in both source and target database, and I want to aggregate two of the source data to the target.
i.e.
SA----------->TA
SB+SC------>TB
void---------->TC
Is this possible? If not, is there any suggestion about the situation? Thanks!
Best Regards,
Martin

Hello Jennifer,
each partition will holds its own subset of data, there is no redundant / mirrored data.
Data is distributed via a hash algorithm

Qosmio G30-161: Question about D port and HD signal

Hi
would anyone know if i was to connect the cable which i got with the qosmio laptop, which is D connector to scart. If i was to get a scart to component and connect both scarts together with an adapter will it work.
would i get the high definition signal

Hi
Please check also this posting:
http://forums.computers.toshiba-europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=12993

Questioning about Partitioning a new Internal Hard Drive

I just bought a new Internal Hard Drive, Western Digital Caviar, 500 GB. I am trying to Partition the Drive but, there is a pull down menu which I am not sure what to select.
On "Volume Scheme, I selected 1 Partition from the menu, BUT, what do I select on "Format"?
It gives me these options:
1. Mac OS Extended (journaled)
2. Mac OS Extended
3. Mac OS Extended (case sensitive, Journaled)
4. Mac OS Extended (case sensitive)
5. Mac OS Extended
Free-Space
I am not sure what to choose here, IF I have to chose anything. All I need is another HD where I will have music samples on it.
Any help would be appreciate it.

For normal purposes, use Mac OS Extended (journaled)

Qosmio G10-133 Question about DVD COMBO Drive replacement

Hi
my laptop has a DVD driver labled UJ-830B but the device managaer reports that it is a UJ-830S. I have posted before saying I haven't been able to burn DVDs. It gets part way through then errors out saying unable to burn. I have used various software and disc makes but all to no avail.
I purchased an external burner which burns no problems, however it does defeat the object of having one built into the lapotop!!!
Can anyone suggest a suitable replacement drive? I have already tried an NEC 5540A drive, but my laptop didn't recognise that it was installed. I assume it is something to do with Master/Slave?? If the laptop doesn't recognise the drive I am obviously unable to flash any firmware.
Somebody please help.....

Hi
Seems you have already noticed that the drive replacement is not so easy.
The internal notebook drives dont support any jumpers like the external drives for desktop PCs and the settings are fixed and in my knowledge not changeable
I found some compatible drives numbers but unfortunately, I did not find the drive names.
It seems this are any internal part numbers.
DVD Super Multi Drive
- MATSU****A (G8CC00021610) UJ830
- MATSU****A (G8CC0001S610)
DVD Super Multi Drive (supporting Double-Layer)
- MATSU****A (G8CC00021611)
- TEAC (G8CC00024611)
However, the service partner could provide you a information about compatible drive.

Question about the partition index

Hi, all, I have some questions about partitioned index.
And I get from oracle documents that oracle's partition index can be clarified as local partition index and global partition index.
And local partition index can be clarified as prefix local partition index and non-prefix local partition index. And I also the word "global prefix partition index".
But, I can not get what the exact meaning after I consulted many documents and notes from website.
Can anyone give me one example to cover these topic?
You help is very thankful!
Thanks and best regards!

Hi,
Local index search by partition.
Local Indexes: A local index is an index on a partitioned table which is partitioned in the exact same manner as the underlying partitioned table. Each partition of a local index corresponds to one and only one partition of the underlying table.
Global Partitioned Indexes: A global partitioned index is an index on a partitioned or non-partitioned table which is partitioned using a different partitioning-key from the table. Global-partitioned indexes can only be partitioned using range partitioning. For example, a table could be range-partitioned by month and have twelve partitions, while an index on that table could be range-partitioned using a different partitioning key and have a different number of partitions.
Global Non-Partitioned Indexes: A global non-partitioned index is essentially identical to an index on a non-partitioned table. The index structure is not partitioned.
Maybe this links help you:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/oracle9i/datasheets/partitioning.html
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:12026637104196321871::NO::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID,F4950_P8_CRITERIA:678824574412
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:::::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID:1612281449571
Cheers

Qosmio X500 Folder migration utility and low disk space drice C

This may be a longish post as I try to explain my problem... please forgive.
I've had my X500 for just over three months now.
It took a little while before the folder migration utility woke up I didn't know it was there after I'd done a limited copy of folders across from my old Qosmio F20. After it had woken up and I'd been able to transfer folders/files across it cleared a lot of room from the 'tiny' - I feel, 60 Gb SSD C drive.
I keep getting a message coming up sometimes, when I boot up, that the folder migration utility has a setting for me. If I open the utility it shows no folders in the 'C' drive area and folders already transfered [from first using it] in the right hand side for the 'D' drive. Text in the bottom of the utility says something like "if you have done some manual transfers then it can't do anything"... something along those lines - sorry for not being clear on that.
I've recently installed some other programs and have endeavoured each time to do a custom install to the D drive to program files [x86] folder. However, drive C is now showing low disk space at 5.58 of 59.2 Gb.
Checking the folders copies??? I thought for the programs I installed I find lots of folders/files in those program folders so taking up a lot of space.
What is the best way to free up space on drive 'C' please?
Should I manually copy the data contained in the folders [not just a 'name' ... ie; AVID... folder but possibly also in the drive C Program files [x86] folder] to the same named folders on drive D?
If I did, would the programs work properly or would there be problems in the program being located?
When the utility first activated [by itself] I thought "Great... transfer of all my old data to the X500 will be easy" but it doesn't seem to be the case. I was expecting that any new programs installed would be automatically copied to drive D. I'm getting somewhat paranoid about the low disk space on drive C.
Help would be appreciated.

Thanks for coming forward PauPau.
Firstly, when I got the x500 I had lots of documents etc., I wanted to transfer over so I used the Win7 Transfer program to make the back up/transfer images. In doing the transfer across [after the copies of] the X500 gave an error warning that the C: drive had insufficient space to do the full copies. At this time/stage I was not aware that the X500 had a folder migration utility. What ever made it 'wake up' and make itself known I have no idea but I used it when it did. My first problem was probably in using the Win7 file transfer - for getting files/folders across from the old computer to the x500!
I ended up doing a factory reset about three times before this utility made it self known. I found NOTHING in ant documentation about the X500 about this utility and how to make use of it when I bought the laptop. Not sure if you are aware of the make up of the X500 having 2 hard drives; a 'C:' drive of 65Gb SSD and a SATA 'D:' drive of 650GB. If you do then my apologies if that comes over in any 'bad' way. The D: drive is NOT a partition of 1 installed hard drive as your reply would seem to suggest you are thinking.
The migration folder utility, when used first time, copied/transfered folders across - even program folders such as Program files [x86] - and left 'similar' named folders on the C: drive. At that time I then thought that any future installs of programs would be put in the D: drive. Only when watching the first time for a new program install did I see it going to the C: Program and Program files [x86] folders instead of those in the D: drive. I then had to uninstall and do a custom install to direct to the D: drive. However... some data appears that it can NOT be directed from the install disk to the D: drive and still goes to the C: drive - HENCE the issue I am having with the small amount of remaining free space on the C: drive.
I accept what you say in reply to my question about the best way to free up space but, based on as explained above, should I have to do a re-install of any program I try to run after being moved to the same named corresponding folder on the separate D: drive [if that is what I have to do] I think the install disk will still do an automatic install of these to the C: drive as at that stage there seems no way of stopping it. Although given the option in a custom install to change the 'drive' to install to such as the D: some data is still going to C: and I'll be in the same predicament that I am now.
If that's the case then maybe this is something that TOSHIBA should be looking in to solving if they are going to produce laptops with two hard drives - - - even if one [the C: drive] is of the SSD make to speed thing up.
I DO appreciate your input. MAybe I didn't explain properly first time... and maybe I haven't this time - in which case I apologies.
Are there no other X500 users with the same issue?
Thanks. I may just have to give it a go and transfer these data files/folders manually to the D: and see what happens if no one here can guide as to stop any hair pulling frustrations if it goes wrong.

Qosmio X500/02 - Question about partition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for