Qualifier Field Not Shown in Qualified Table

Hi All,
Can anybody tell me why the values of qualifier fields are not shown in the qualified tables? And where are those qualifier values stored, in the main table or in the qualified table itself?
Best Regards
Jerome

Hi Jerome,
Before starting, I am assuming there is no confusion relating to Qualifiers & Non-Qualifiers.
Non-Qualifiers --> Decidors/Fields whose value changes
Qualifiers --> Fields which get decided/whose value changes based on the Non-Qualifers.
You said - "<i>Can anybody tell me why the values of qualifier fields are not shown in the qualified tables?</i> "
<b>1. )</b>What I understood from your question is that; when you select your Qualified Table in the Record Mode of the Data Manager, the qualifiers appear to be locked/non-editable. Is that right?
All the qualifiers are locked because <b>they have no context in the Qualified table.</b>
For e.g.: If your Qualified table is "Addresses" consisting of
Non-Qualifiers --> Address Type(say Home(can be more than 1), Office,etc)
Qualifiers --> HouseNo,Street, City, Country,etc.
What would it mean if we put the street name "XYZ Street" for the record selected. Nothing -- the street must be connected to a main table record, a Customer(Cust_Id)  and and an address-type(Home) to have meaning.
<b>2.)</b> If the above interpretation of your Q is not correct, then 2nd case could be --> when you select your main table in DM (Record Mode)and try to add a Qualified Lookup value to a record you are unable to see the qualifiers. Right?
In the main table Double-click on the quailfied lookup field. An screen pops-up. Here we see the available lookup records -- these are in fact the records we saw when we switched to view the Addresses qualified lookup fields, which means these are the values stored in the non-qualifiers. You have to select & add them (Selected Lookup Records). The qualifiers become enabled. Now you an add values to them.
You can either use an existing Address type or add a record to the Qualified-Lookup Table from here.  We can add and remove types of addresses -- a main table record may have any number of any type of address. When we add a type, for example "Favourite Restaurant Address"(say), we can enter information for the qualifiers, those field which make sense only when connected to a main table record and a non-qualifier. If we add two "Home" addresses each can have it's own values for the City, Street, Country, State and Postal Code qualifier fields
To answer 2nd part of your Q - "<i>And where are those qualifier values stored, in the main table or in the qualified table itself?</i>"
Qualifiers are database “subfields” that apply not to the qualified table record by itself, but <b>rather to each association of a qualified table record with a main table record.</b>
Hope this helped your cause. Please mark helpful answers.
Regards,
Siddharth Sharma.

Similar Messages

  • Po is created by manully but it is not shown in ekko table

    Hi,
    PO is created my manully , it is saved by as a 28 number .In EKKO table this PO number  is not shown but 27 and 29 PO number are availble in EKKO table .Please help me on this.
    And how we can retive the 28 PO .
    Thanks
    Happy .

    Hi,
    check the ST22 transaction, you might have got Update Termination error for that.
    In such cases, system generate the messages of PO Creation and terminate prior to saving the Transaction.
    It will not be possible to retrieve it back.
    regards,
    S Anand

  • Custom udf is not shown in USR table

    hi all,
    i have created 3 custom udf in oim 11g r2 system console in usr form. and then
    got them displayed in my create, modify and view user page in identity console.
    but i cannot find my custom udf's in the database USR TABLE.
    i followed the following to add in create/modify user page
    ogin->identity url->users->create user->enter values for mandatory fields->click customize->leftTopcorner->View->Source->select area->edit->Click Add Content (on left top)->Data Component catalog->scroll down and select User VO->Refresh dialogue box->select the field and click 'Add'->on dropdown select 'ADF Input test w/label->close that window->Check if it added to create user form->save and close customization
    NOTE: hey mine is a clone environment. I have teseted the above on our original envrionment and there i am able to see the udf created in USR TABLE TOO..
    but not in my cloned evnironment of oim.
    do i need to configure some changes in files.???
    please help.
    thank
    Edited by: 972117 on Jan 29, 2013 5:53 AM
    Edited by: 972117 on Jan 29, 2013 5:54 AM

    login to sysadmin console. click on export option. select metadata and export it. save it at your local machine. now agian login sysadmin at cloned machine and select import option finally select this xml and import it.

  • JDBC receiver error: field not exist in the table

    But the field does exist.
    Columns  Name Data Type Size Scale Not NULL Default Value
    EMPID VARCHAR2 10
    EMPNAME VARCHAR2 30
    EMPAGE VARCHAR2 3
    FLAG VARCHAR2 1
    The Database is Oracle.
    Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'emp' (structure 'Statement1'): java.sql.SQLException: FATAL ERROR: Column 'flag' does not exist in table 'emp'.

    Does it have the field flag?? XI is case sensitive!!Check you have the correct spelling and case.
    Even if not workig use this same thread JDBC Problem Part III (SQL error?)
    Edited by: Dharamveer Gaur on Oct 10, 2008 7:56 AM

  • Addtional tab CI field not getting updated in table

    Hi all,
    I am using cProjects 4.0 system.
    I had implemented addtional custom tab to display project custom include fields. In CI include of dpr_project table i added custom fields.
    Then created new webdynpro component and in implemented interface tab in had implemented DPR_CUST_EXT_INTF.  In view i displayed the 2 custom fields i added. In cProjects SPRO, i had given my component name for addtional tab. When I run the application it is showing those fields i added in addtional tab. While saving it is not updating custom field. Please let me know what needs to be done.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Karthick S

    Hi,
    For adding custom fields from CI_* includes, I advise you to use available feature in SAP standard 'field groups for customer fields' under : SPRO -> Collaboration Projects -> Global Enhancements to Project Elements.
    This is the easiest way to add custom tabs & fields without webdynpro development. All standard functions are supported: field control, save, BADI...
    BR
    Matthias

  • Last field not shown in MONI if its empty during content conversion-urgent

    Hi All,
            I have my input structure like
       <RECORDSET>
          <EMPLOYEE>
             <FIRSTNAME>
             <LASTNAME>
             <PHONENUMBER>
          </EMPLOYEE>
       </RECORDSET>
           I have given my sender Conversion parameters like
       Employee.fieldSeparator=*
       Employee.endSeparator='nl'
       Employee.fieldNames=FIRSTNAME,LASTNAME,PHONENUMBER
    It is working fine.But if the value is empty for any of the field it is showing up with empty tag in MONI but for the Last field i.e.,PHONENUMBER if the value is empty the tag is not being shown in MONI. Please help me in this issue.It is very urgent.

    Hi Dinakar,
    I haven't tried but u can check these parameters and give it a try
    <b>NameA.missingLastfields</b>
    If the inbound structure has less fields than specified in the configuration then the XML outbound structure is created as follows:
    &#9675;       ignore
    Outbound structure only contains the fields in the inbound structure
    &#9675;       add
    Outbound structure contains all fields from the configuration; the fields missing in the inbound structure are empty.
    &#9675;       error
    Conversion is terminated due to the incomplete inbound structure. An error message is displayed.
    &#9679; <b>     NameA.additionalLastFields</b>
    If the inbound structure has more fields than specified in the configuration then the XML outbound structure is created as follows:
    &#9675;       ignore
    Outbound structure only contains the fields in the inbound structure
    &#9675;       error
    Conversion is terminated due to the incomplete inbound structure. An error message is displayed.
    The default value is ignore. If you have defined the NameA.fieldFixedLengths parameter, the default value is error.
    <b>NameA.lastFieldsOptional</b> (obsolete)
    You use this parameter to specify whether the last fields can be omitted (YES) or not (NO) in a comma-separated structure.
    If you do not make an entry, the default value is NO.
    Check for details:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2c/181077dd7d6b4ea6a8029b20bf7e55/frameset.htm
    Sachin

  • Custom Fields not shown in BSEG using OXK3 transaction

    Hi,
    I have added new custom fields in Expert Mode using OXK3 transaction to add new fields in BSEG table.
    The Include CI_COBL is created with custom fields in OXK3  .
    I then tried to add fields by selecting "Add Field to BSEG" but an access key is required which I do not have.
    Now is there any other way or what is the next step to reflect the custom fields in BSEG table after creating the CI_COBL in OXK3 transaction.
    I do not have access to SAP Marketplace from where I can refer to SAP Notes.
    Thanks
    Amit

    Hello Amit,
    Are you sure this is a question related to SAP ByDesign and not SAP ECC?
    You will certainly have more luck finding answers in the right forum thread.
    Best regards.
    Jacques-Antoine Ollier

  • Custom field not updating in MARC table by mm01/mm02/mm03

    Hi,
    I have created a sub screen in Plant storage 2 of MM01 tcode with a custom field.  The field is visible in the screen but the value is not getting updated in the MARC table.  We can update the MARA table through the exit of MPA00001 but there is no option for updating the MARC table.  Please let me know if there are any options.

    HI Geeta,
    Chek this
    DATA: H_ZE1MARCM LIKE ZE1MARCM.
    IF F_CUST_SEGMENT-SEGNAM EQ 'ZE1MARCM'.
      H_ZE1MARCM = F_CUST_SEGMENT-SDATA.
      IF H_ZE1MARCM-ZMYFIELD = C_NODATA.
        CLEAR H_ZE1MARCM-ZMYFIELD.
      ELSE.
        IF H_ZE1MARCM-ZMYFIELD IS INITIAL.
          RES_FIELDS-FELDNAME = 'MARC-ZMYFIELD'.
          APPEND RES_FIELDS.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
      F_MARC_UEB-ZMYFIELD = H_ZE1MARCM-ZMYFIELD.
    ENDIF.
    Given By Lars,
    Regards,
    Madhu.

  • Text Field not shown in Adobe 6.0 and 7.0

    I created a simple pdf file with a text field in Adobe LiveCycle Designer 7.0. After I fill the text field with a third party tool in a program, the field's value dosen't appear in Adobe Professional 7.0 while appears in Adobe Professional 6.0. What is a problem? Does some settings will affect this case?
    Thanks for any answer...

    Thanks for your reply.
    I had another test recently.
    I save a pdf as a "compatible with 6.0" type which is created by Adobe Designer 7.0. After I opened it in 6.0 and filled the text field, it worked well. But when I opened it in 7.0, all the value was lost.
    Is 7.0 not well compatible with 6.0? What could I do if I created pdf with 7.0 and the users use 6.0 (you know, I can't request all the users to use new 7.0)?
    Any advice will be appreciated.

  • Customer field Not shown in ME21n and ME22N

    Hi,
    While creation ME21N and change ME22N we are unable to get Customer field in Delivery address tab of the PO, We are getting Address and Vendor (Sc Vendor) fields in Delivery address tab , but customer not able to see.
    The Customer field we can seen through ME23N.
    We have cross check screen layout for ME21N and ME22 and NBF here in all cases Customer field is Optional.

    Hi,
    Please check screen layout for AKTH & AKTV.
    Regards
    Subbu.

  • How to search for a qualifier field?

    Hello Experts,
    I have a field of type Lookup[qualified flat] in the MDM main table. The lookup table has 5-6 fields, some are qualifier and some are non-qualifier. I want to perform a search which is combination of qualifier as well as non-qualifier fields of the lookup table.
    For non-qualifier I have used FieldSearchDimension for non-qualifier field and QualifierSearchDimension for qualifier filed. But I am not getting the expected result. Could you please help.
    Pictorially the scenarion is like:
    MDM Main Table-> Field X(lookup[qualified flat])
    Field X - Sub Field X1[qualifier - no]
                - Sub Field X2[qualifier - yes]
    Search criteria : Combination of Sub field X1 and sub field X2.
    Thanks in anticipation!
    Rakesh

    Hi Rakesh,
    Adopt a drill down mechanism while using a Qualified lookup search.
    In Datamanager, search parameters for a qualified lookup table appear as 3 distinct boxes - one below the other -
    Box 1 : Look ups in Non qualifiers and their values
    Box 2 : Qualified field : Displays all the valid Qualified field values that exist for a main table record.
    Box 3: Qualifiers and their Values.
    In your case, Sub Field X1( Non Qualifier) will appear in Box 1 ; Sub Field X2 (qualifier) will appear in Box3.
    To achieve the expected search you want follw the below steps in seq :
    1. Select Sub Field X1( Non Qualifier)  in Box 1 and then select its lookup value.
    2. Select Sub Field X2 (qualifier) in Box3 and then select its lookup value.
    You will have your combination search results visible. To cross check the selection you have made, select 'Search Selections' tab and verify.
    Regards,
    Vinay

  • Values of Non-Qualifiers (lookups) not auto-converting.

    We've been trying to use Import Server to automatically import records (XML) that had data for qualified lookup tables. Apparently there is an issue with namespaces in both the schema that we mapped to and the source field.
    After removing the namespaces, we now have an issue with the non-qualifier that uses a lookup table not automapping it's values and thus retaining the compound field at the Customer main level.
    First, the Partner Function is mapped to the Partner Function flat lookup table. At this level, the value auto-converts and the green dot is visible to the left. 
    Second, at the Customer Partner qualified lookup, the Partner Function is again mapped to the Partner Function lookup. This time, however, the values do not automatically convert and the "AUTOMAP" button must be manually pushed for them to map. The other non-qualifiers (CustomerID, PartnerNum, PartnerSAP_ID) are also mapped and their values auto-convert (green dot).
    Finally, at the Customer main level, all of the non-qualified field from the Customer Partner table are mapped and all auto-convert except for the Partner Function field. This requires us to manually push "Automap". Then, and only then, does it allow us to right click on one of the fields and create the compound field to map to the Customer Partner field. Again, the value mapping is not automatic but must be done manually.
    This map is then saved and ImpMgr closed. When the IM is reopened with the same map, the compound field is not recreated due to the fact that the Partner Function values did not convert. Once these are redone manually, then and only then can the compound field be recreated and value mapped.
    When this same map is used in the Import Server, the error is that the qualified fields cannot be mapped. This brings us back to the lookup fields not value mapping. Likewise, if this same file is opened in Import Manager mannually, and the map applied, it STILL does not convert the values and the Compound Field for the Qualified L/Up table is dropped. 
    We are using MDM 5.5 SP4 Patch 3.

    Hello Christiane,
    Yes, this is a very important point and I should have noted it in my original post. Yes, my Default Batch Handling settings are:
      Yes - Automap unmapped values
      Add - Unmapped Value Handling
    Plus:
      Replace - Default multi-valued update
      Append - Deault qualified update
      None - Default matching qualifiers
    Also, in my mdis.ini file, my settings are:
      Automap Unmapped Value = True
      Unmapped Value Handling = Add
      Always Use Unmapped Value Handling = True
    It used to work when we were in SP4, Patch 2, but have since upgraded to Patch 3, Hotfix 2(?) and can't get it to work.
    Thanks for helping!
    Don

  • Matching and Merging Qualified fields

    Hi,
    I want to match and merge fields in a qualified table.
    Eg: Have to match the Street, City(Yes Qualifier) in the Qualified table Address.
    Have created the transformation, rule and startegy on these fields.
    When I execute the strategy, i'm able to see the scores and class.
    But in the "Merge" tab only fields of Main table are visible. I'm not able to see the required Address table fields and hence not able to make the decision on which field should be merged.
    How do i execute this scenario?

    Hi ketan,
      Basically you can perform matching and merging only on Main table and not on qualified tables; and if you have to match any qualified lookup field in the main table then it should be an qualifier field(i.e. the qualified option should be YES),
      And while matching the records of a qualifier field when the values matches it shows only the display fields of the qualified table not the qualifier fields as already they have the same value you don't require them again.
      I couldn't understand the structure you gave above, but i will take this example
    Qualified table(Price)
           field_Name          Displayfiled       Qualifiedfield
             Price                      Yes                 No
             Quantity                 Yes                  No
             Currency               No                     YES
    Main table(Products)
              field_Name         Type            
              Product               Text
               Price                Look-up(Price)
    now the values in main table
       Product          Price
      cream            05 | 10 | Rs
      Cloth             10 | 05 | $
      Pen               20 | 02 | Rs
      Pencil            02 | 02 | Rs
    now you write a rule using the price lookup qualifier field.
    it will show  cream , pen and pencil as matching.
    you can now merge as
    ___________       cream                 Pen         Pencil
    ___________        05 | 10               20 | 02      02 | 02 
    now you can select the product any one of those there and price any one of those three but as the currency qualifier field is same for all; its not displayed nor is it showed over here.
    If the scenario is different form this which you require; please let me know, but the common scenario is the same.
    Regards,
    CHARAN

  • Material not shown in the MCHB table

    Dear MM Gurus,
    I have created a batch managed material and posted stock. When I checked the stock in MMBE it shows the available stock for that material. My problem is, the material is not shown in MCHB table, but the material is available in the tables MCHA, MARA and MARD.
    Any idea on why this has happened and How to correct the issue.

    do you see a batch number in MMBE?
    do you see a batch number in the movement (display document in MIGO, or via MB51)?
    MCHA has no stock information. MCHA can be created manually with MSC1N transaction, must not necessarily mean that it is automatically created from a goods receipt.

  • Measure Values are not shown in the pivot tables

    Measures without aggregation (in rpd) are not shown in pivot table.
    Im trying to add multiple columns in the fact table as measures,one which is summable had has the SUM function and three which are not summable.
    The initial report will be as follows and I have been able to get the data displayed.
    Year | Month| Company Name| SUM(C1)| C2|C3
    However if I pivot the table as follows data in column C2 and C3 are not Displayed.
    Columns
         Year     
              Month     
              Company     
    Rows                    
    Measure Lablel                    
    Measures
         SUM(C1)     
                   C2     
                   C3                    
    Should we have an aggregation rule applued in C2 and C3 ?

    Yes, all the column entries must have agg rule. You can specify one such as 'first' in the pivot table.

Maybe you are looking for