Quality loss when rendering to FLV or F4V

I've got an AE project that includes simple motion graphics and screen capture footage.. when I render it as an MOV, it looks great.. but if I render it as an FLV or F4V, the gradients within the movie look all pixilated. I've tried rendering the project to FLV/F4V from AE as well as rendering a high quality MOV and bringing it into Adobe Media Encoder to create the flash video file. No matter what settings I use, the animation ends up being jerky instead of smooth, and the gradients look terrible. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.

Look at the two images, the one on the right is my MOV .. the one on the left is my FLV. Below those are the settings I used to render the FLV.

Similar Messages

Major Quality Loss when rendered/exported

Hello,
I'm trying to export a video to upload on YouTube, but I am completely stumped.
Everything is crisp until I render. It's odd that I lose quality AFTER I render. Now to add on top of that, when I export, it loses even more quality. If someone can just tell me a few troubleshooting options and their preferred settings when exporting.
I am on a Mac by the way.

That didn't seem to help. Picture one is how it looks BEFORE rendered.
Picture 2 is how it looks AFTER rendered. I don't get this phenomenon.
I'm not sure if you can see the difference, but a lot of quality was lost.

Sync when compressing HD FLV and F4V in Premiere Pro CS4

Hi. I'm trying to create PSAs for You Tube that were originally created with a small camera that produced HD Quicktime files. For YouTube they don't have to be perfect but that is what I'm working with. My computer only has 4gb of ram so I can't watch the video to test for syncronization since it just gives a slide show while editing. It never does anything but a slide show with HD video.
When I watch the original unedited Quicktime file the sync was way off. When I render out the original file in an FLV and F4V format just to test the sync it is PERFECT. Then I edited the first video taken from that session and used FLV and the sync was PERFECT. So I'm doing the second video, tested sync on the original footage, and its PERFECT.
So I thought it was okay to keep going. Everything was perfect after Premiere rendered the raw footage. The first video worked, right? The second video's raw footage sync was fixed, right?
Now that I spent all the time to edit the 2nd video, sync is TERRIBLE. I have no idea why. F4V was worse than FLV, but neither was great for video 2. So I guess I have two questions:
1) What format can I use to upload to YouTube that won't give me an unusable sync problem
2) Is there something I can do to see continuous synchronization within Premiere Pro CS4 without updating my hardware? I am using Vista 64 bit, 4gb ram, dual core intel. Do I have to make a major hardware upgrade just to get HD video not to be a slide show while running Premiere?
Thanks!

Dave,
Deleted all stuff...
You might try this "TEST" at some point if you're using equipment to record sound as outlined in the following article....at any rate you might find the article interesting anyway for the future...
----------------------sorry I should give credit to who wrote it but you can google the first line and find it maybe -----------
sync demuxed sound The Problem -
Miniature audio recorders, be they minidisc or solid state, offer a very attractive, cost effective, alternative to the traditional use of radio microphones, for the capture of remote audio sources in video recordings
These machines record the audio in a variety of different formats - MP3, WMA, WAV, ATRAC -- and in a variety of qualities - but they all suffer from the same problem. It can be difficult to synchronise the remotely recorded audio, with the camera recorded audio.
Although the time honoured tradition of an audio 'clapper board' works well enough to align the beginning of the two soundtracks, there is a tendency for the two tracks to appear to 'drift' out of sync over time - and the longer the recording, the worse the problem. In fact they do not actually 'drift', but the gradual loss of sync is a function of the camera and audio recorder sample clocks being slightly different frequencies.
The simple reason for this loss of 'sync' therefore is that the audio is being recorded at different speeds. Although the recorder will specify the sampling frequency, the accuracy is then dependent on the internal crystal oscillator of the recorder - which is, of course, a different oscillator from the one controlling the camera timing. Although these crystals may typically be accurate to within 0.005% or better, even this degree of accuracy can cause the two recorded audio tracks to be out of sync by up to 300mS after 30 minutes. Even after 5 minutes, the 2 tracks can be some 60mS different in length, in a worst case scenario.
60mS difference will cause a distinctly audible 'echo' between the two audio tracks. (Even 20mS is detectable as a separate echo).
This difference is of course totally unacceptable, and corrections need to be applied. It is important to remember that even if your audio recorder crystal is absolutely accurate, and it is the camera clock that is slightly wrong, it is still the remote audio track that will have to be corrected. The 'wrong' camera audio track is the one in sync with the video, and has to be the 'master' track.
The Solution
It is important to realise that although the sample oscillators may vary with regard to each other, they tend to be remarkably accurate over time, referenced to themselves.
This means that if you know by how much the frequency your audio recorder sample 'clock' differs from the camera 'clock', then a single correction factor will bring both tracks back into sync.
A simple procedure is outlined below, using free programs, to enable you to calculate the correction factor required for your particular recorder.
Programs required (all free):
1) AoA audio Extractor --- (not necessary if you can extract the audio track from a video recording in your NLE)
2) Audacity , a free audio editor
3) Switch , a free audio file type converter
Step 1: Set up your camera and audio recorder next to each other, and start both running
Step 2: Make a good audio 'clapperboard' point by tapping a pencil firmly onto a hard surface, as close to both camera and recorder mics as possible. This will cause a fast 'edge' to become the reference point, which will be useful later.
Step3: Let both devices run for at least 10 minutes. 20 minutes are better, but not essential.
At the end of the period, (timing not critical), make a second similar 'clapperboard' reference point. Allow a few more seconds recording, and then stop both devices.
Step 4: Download the video from the camera, and the audio from the recorder to your computer.
Step 5: Open the video file in 'AoA audio Extractor', and extract the audio from the video. Convert this audio file (if necessary) to a 48KHz 16 bit LPCM (wav) file, using the 'Switch' program linked to above. This file will be your reference audio file.
Step 6: Open the WAV file saved in the previous step in 'Audacity' - a free audio editor.
It is now necessary to save only the part of the file between the two 'clapperboard' references, which hopefully stand out clearly (if you hit the pencil hard enough in steps 2 and 3!).
This must be done accurately, to within 100th of a second, or better.
Click and drag the file to highlight the beginning section, including the first 'clapperboard' waveform. Use the 'fit selection to window' tool (immediately to the right of the 'zoom' tools) to magnify. Delete as much as possible before the 'clapper' reference. Repeat the operation until you can clearly identify the first distinct waveform of the 'clapper' reference waveform. Click, hold and place the cursor directly over the first full (clipped) waveform, where it crosses the centre line. Delete every thing to the left of that point, by clicking and dragging to highlight, and then deleting with the scissors tool.
Step 7: Repeat the above procedure for the end part of the waveform, again using the start of the second 'clapper' waveform as your reference cutting point. In this case, cut everything to the right of your selected reference point (not the left, as in the first case.)
Step 8: It is necessary to record the exact length of this new cropped waveform. This information is listed at the bottom of the window, but in a rather inappropriate format. Locate the toolbar at the top of the window, click 'Edit'-'select all' and then 'Effects'-'change tempo' . Note the length of the file in seconds in the right hand box (the left hand box is greyed out).
Record this figure. It is the reference file length
Step 9: It is necessary to convert the file recorded on the audio recorder into an identical format to the camera audio track, namely 48 KHz 16 bit PCM. If the track is not already in this format, open it in Switch, a free file transfer program, and select the output encoding as 48 KHz 16 bit, mono or stereo to fit your audio file. This program will then convert whatever format your input file is (MP3, WMA, 44.1 KHz PCM, etc) into the required 48 KHz, 16 bit format required.
Step 10: Repeat the procedures in steps 6 and 7 for this new file. Edit the 'clapper' points with as much accuracy as before, but notice that the 'clapper' waveform will appear different from the first, although hopefully with as clearly defined first ' zero crossing' point.
Step 11: Repeat the procedure in step 8, and you will notice that the overall file length is different.
Overwrite the original file length into the right hand box, and take careful note of the resulting figure in the percent change box. Make sure you record whether it is a plus or minus value - it could be either! This is the most important figure, because it represents the percentage variation between the two units.
Once you have obtained this value, simply apply it to all files recorded with the same recorder and this camera. Providing you can align the start of the file with a single 'clapperboard' mark, there is no need to repeat the rest. Simply change the length of the external audio file by the correct percentage value, to allow the two audio tracks to remain synchronised.
It may seem a long winded process, but it only needs to be done once, and could then save quite a lot of time, against the option of trying to align tracks manually in your NLE, in small sections.
You may of course wish to use an alternative audio editor, and the details of this procedure may then be slightly different, but the principle remains the same.

Motion Graphics quality loss when encoding to DVD

I have completed a logo reveal and movie titles for our short film that we will be authored to DVD. I used AE CS4 and created the compositions as 1050x756 PAL square pixels.
The uncompressed AVI renders look amazing. However, when i encode using MPEG2-DVD straight from AE there is a big hit on quality. I understand that encoding is about compressing and that we need to expect a certain amount of quality loss. But the text is especially bad.
I read somewhere that saturated reds are not particularly well handled by the MPEG-2 encoders. So we changed the color to a more subdued burned orange. We also remove the titles horizontal scroll on the screen that was causing excessive flickering. But there is still a high rate of quality loss on the text.
Is there any special workflow that i should be using, tips or tricks that you know of? I see some awesome intro titles on DVD and the text does not behave in this way.
Any pointers and suggestion you can give, would be greatly appreciated

Robert:
The MPEG-2 encoder in AE/AME is a very good, general purpose encoder.
Commercial DVD titles frequently use high-end, specialized encoders. This includes very expensive, hardware-based encoders.
That said, you could get better quality from the MPEG-2 encoder in Adobe applications by using 2 pass encoding. Unfortunately, the Render Queue in AE only can do 1 pass encoding. In order to use 2 pass encoding, you'd have to launch Adobe Media Encoder in standalone mode, pick an MPEG-2 DVD preset and enable 2 pass encoding.
Specialized encoders include, for example, Cinemacraft SP. It can do multipass encoding and offers a great deal of control over encoding settings. Even as a software-based solution, it's not cheap.
It's also worth pointing out that type for highly compressed media has its' set of do's and don't's. Applying a very subtle vertical blur (Reduce Interlace Flicker) usually helps. Fonts designed for high-resolution media (most families with serifs) need to be used at large sizes, or use sans serif typefaces for smaller sizes, etc.

Quality Loss When Importing Video into Timeline...Any Ideas??

Hey all -
I'm fairly new to CS4, so excuse me if this question is a little dumb.
I've offered to edit a friend's actor showreel to familiarize myself with CS4. He gave me a bunch of HD clips: they're .MOV files, and are 1920x1080 and 23.976fps.
I can import a clip and drag it into the preview screen in the middle: it looks fine. However, when I drag it onto the timeline, it suddenly looks faded and blurred. It's not horrible, but it loses the vibrancy of color, the sharpness and the contrast of the original clip. A lot of the quality is gone.
I've tried opening the project with a number of different settings, no difference. I thought it might look OK when I exported it, but it looks just like it does on the timeline monitor: a little washed-out, blurred, just not as nice as the original.....
I'd hate to present it to my pal looking like this, can anyone suggest a solution? I tried everything I could think of already....
Thanks!!
B

Hi Hunt -
many thanks for your reply. I've spent the last couple of days trying to follow your advice and do more research.....still no luck.
Firstly, I upgraded my OS to Windows 7, thought it might help for some reason. Didn't. I downloaded a bunch of codec packs.
Gspot reports:
Codec: AVC1
Name: H.264
Codec Status: undetermined
So I'm basically running through all the possible output formats, but really it doesn't seem to be an encoding problem: the quality loss happens as soon as I move the file from the preview screen to the timeline.
If you have any othe suggestions I'be very pleased!!
Thanks
Bruce

Quality loss when converting pro res to mp4

Hi
I have a problem with the workflow from After Effects to a final .mp4 video.
I have been editing time lapses in After Effects, and exporting them as Pro Res HQ- all good so far. However, I can´t seems to be able to convert the Pro Res file to a .mp4 (or quick time .mov for that matter) without significant quality loss. This happens if I convert using adobe media encoder, or if I import the Pro Res files to Premiere and export through Premiere.
However, if I import the original JPG/TIFs to Premiere, and export using the exact same setting- I get a better result. Also, when I have uploaded the original Pro Res HQ file to vimeo, they do a much better job of converting it than Media Encoder or Premiere do when I convert to .mp4 (I´m aware that it is not the same conversion, but still..).
So my conclusion must be that AME and PP does not convert from Pro Res to other codecs very well? I have to work on my files in AE, and I need .mp4 as the final product (requirement for uploading to a stock site). How do I do this without getting lower quality video than if my workflow and export was only in Premiere? After Effects does not render out .mp4 very well it seems...
A screenshot showing the setting I use when exporting from PP or AME. The settings produce a good result when exporting other files from PP, but not the Pro Res files I have exporter from AE.
Thanks for your input!

Figured it out after testing various settings. I read an article describing the keyframe interval setting at 1 as the best option- clearly that was wrong! After searching I found a better description of keyframe interval: "Having too many keyframes severely reduces quality, because the efficiency of reusing image areas from previous frames is completely lost at each keyframe – the encoder has to "start over" at every keyframe. Therefore, we want as few keyframes as possible to achieve the highest quality for the given target bitrate."
Tested with keyframe settings 25 and 75- both seem fine.
Thanks for the feedback

Major Quality loss when editing in Iphoto 09

Hi,
I am a new user to Imac and Iphoto and I saw that when I edit an Image in Iphoto, I loose a lot of my original data.
I have found that I can return to the original picture, but I wish to edit (especially using the CROP function) then print the Image on 20x30 cm size and therefore I need all the quality I can get.
When I Crop either JPEG or .RAW formatted images (for example 10 MBytes in size) even if I select the COMPLETE image, I am left with only 4 or 5 Mbytes of data.
It gets much worse when I really Crop a part of the picture.
A 12 Mega pixel photo should supply sufficient data to cover a complete wall, but for some reason a lot of quality is lost when I use any of the editing features.
Am I doing something wrong ?
Should I change any of the settings ?
Thanks for your advice

Welcome to the Apple Discussions.
the only difference is that Iphoto took my quality !!
Are you basing the "quality" loss on visual appearance of the photo or on the resulting size of the jpeg file? If it's the latter that is really not an accurate method. True, some information is lost with a jpeg edit and save (only the first edit in iPhoto results in additional jpeg compression) but, in my experience, you would have to print a VERY large print before seeing any noticeable image degradation. I've compressed jpegs as high as 60%, i.e. a quality setting of 40, and for most all uses up to 5x7 prints haven't seen noticeable image degradation. However, I realize image quality is subjective and open to individual interpretation.
So unless you are visibly seeing image degradation I wouldn't worry about the file size reduction, especially in iPhoto as it's compressed only once no matter how many edits are made and saved. Apple uses a compression algorithm that gives the best image quality for the amount of compression it uses.
The following is from the Usernet FAQ site article "JPEG image compression FAQ, part 1/2':
Subject: [4] How well does JPEG compress images?
Very well indeed, when working with its intended type of image (photographs and suchlike). For full-color images, the uncompressed data is normally 24 bits/pixel. The best known lossless compression methods can compress such data about 2:1 on average. JPEG can typically achieve 10:1 to 20:1 compression without visible loss, bringing the effective storage requirement down to 1 to 2 bits/pixel. 30:1 to 50:1 compression is possible with small to moderate defects, while for very-low-quality purposes such as previews or archive indexes, 100:1 compression is quite feasible. An image compressed 100:1 with JPEG takes up the same space as a full-color one-tenth-scale thumbnail image, yet it retains much more detail than such a thumbnail.
Read more: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/jpeg-faq/part1/#ixzz0UKB59gND
Message was edited by: Old Toad

Quality loss when exporting to quicktime (no conversion)

i'm trying to export a fully rendered project in final cut pro (6.0.2).
i'm using the option i always used:
"export -> quicktime movie..." (not "using quicktime conversion")
the idea was to convert the movie later to h.264 (using the quicktime pro player).
normally this always gave me a quicktime movie with ± the same quality as when played directly in final cut.
no difference whether exporting as self-contained movie or referenced movie (besides the result file size of course).
only, now it's different, see here (quicktime player left, final cut right):
the text (done using LiveType) is displayed in completely unusable quality. (difference in color etc. doesn't bother me right now)
where does that come from? in final cut i don't see this rendered quality anywhere...
i also tried:
deleting the render cache, rendering the project again, no difference
export -> quicktime movie, "self-contained" or referenced movie, no difference in quality.
i didn't have this problem with the same project some months ago. back then i probably wasn't running 10.4.11 and quicktime 7.4.1.
any idea what to try?

There is no quality lost.
The default of QuickTime player when showing DV is to display 1 field and double height the image. This is to avoid interlace combing on the non-interlaced computer display.
IF you type cmd-j and bring up the info for your clip, thusly:
In the lower right corner you'll notice the High Quality flag:
Setting it will take you from this:
to this:
Alternatively, you can go into the QuickTime Player preferences and set the default there:
Make sense?
Patrick

Quality loss when playing DVD authored in Encore on a HD flat screen

Hi,
I authored a DVD in Encore and i noticed that when i played it on my pc it looked fine but when played using a DVD player on a HD flat screen and projector there is a significant quality loss- the image became pixelated and glittery. I tried playing 3 other professional videos and they were all fine. Something must be wrong in the way i am authoring my video. The encore file is set to 720x576 at 25fps. I created a .psd menu page to match these dimension and besides the movies, both the menu page i created and the menu templates that are already there in the library when you buy the software, look glittery when played with a projector or HD flat screen and projector. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Eric

Lack of control over users players/TVs is a problem. And you can try to provide some instruction.
You are right to test your product to see if you have a reasonable chance of your DVDs looking good.
First, test them on a DVD player and a standard definition TV. Your test on the PC is not sufficient. If they do not look good here, you have problems somewhere in your workflow. (I suspect this is the case. In my tests below, I see no flashing or issues like what you describe.)
If okay there, you need an upscaling DVD player to test on your HD TV. You should also explore the options on that TV for setting size.
For example, I just put a DVD in my Bluray player (hooked via HDMI to an HD 1080p TV). I can set the player and the TV separately to various resolution settings. Forcing the player to 480 and the TV to Normal gives a picture that looks like the original version, using a regular DVD player set to a 4:3 TV. But when I set the Bluray player back to "HDMI auto" (for the resolution), and the TV to normal, I see a pretty respectible picture.
I did the same sort of test using a regular DVD player via regular AV cable. Discovered I had it set to the wrong TV type! I could not see a lot of difference in the picture, even if I stretched it. (It was distorted, of course, but not pixelated, just not the crisp look of HD.)

Quality Loss when sharing

I have recently upgraded from Windows Movie Maker to Premiere Elements 8 and I have noticed a considerable loss in quality when I have burned my project. The source media is pretty poor, I use a Panasonic VDR-D160 mini DVD camcorder (yes it is a total nightmare getting importing the footage), and when I import the footage it is a .VOB file. The stats for the .VOB files I am working with are 704 x 576 picture that goes at 25 frames per second. The data rate is 9558kbps and the total bitrate is 9814kbps.
The first project I have done is very straight forward, with minimal editing and no effects. However, when I burn it to a DVD or a DVD folder it changes the frame to 720 x 576 and reduces both the data rate and bit rate to 7464kbps and 7656kbps respectively. This creates an obvious pixilation of the image - especially for parts of the video that are moving and it can be seen on lower resolution televisions. In sharing/publishing the video, how do I retain the same quality as the original? I have been through the help, and due to my lack of understanding of premiere elements I have not been able to figure out whether it is just a matter of changing one of the settings.
Thanks!

Unfortunately, you are starting with material that has already been compressed heavily to the MPEG-2 format/CODEC. Then you are editing and outputting to a Scaled up (the DVD-spec for PAL) and then re-compressed to MPEG-2. This is a triple whammie. Because PrE does not do "smart Rendering," what you see is what you will get.
A better choice for limited editing, basically just Trimming the material, would be a program that does "smart Rendering," where all material, that was not altered, except to remove portions of it, would NOT be Transcoded a second time to MPEG-2. I believe that some of the Sony Vegas products do this, but there are others. If you Google "smart rendering," you will see several programs, that feature this. I would choose from those.
You will still have the Scaling issue, unless you completely allow your smaller than spec. material to be surrounded by black. If you Scale in an editing program, even with smart Rendering, it will then need to be Transcoded to MPEG-2 all over again.
With that footage, the choices are very limited.
Good luck, and sorry for the bad news.
Hunt

Massive quality loss when converting a .mov file to an .avi or other

I have been making short videos using final cut that look great in quicktime format. But when I convert them to any format that can be used in powerpoint or other window applications I am suffering a huge loss of quality. What am I doing wrong or how can I get better quality conversions?
Thanks

What settings are you using to export? Lousy looking video is usually a result of not enough bitrate or major resizing/scaling of the video.

Quality Loss when transferring AVCHD File from Flash Card to iMovie

I have a Canon HF100 and the HD video looks great when I play directly from the video camera to the television. However, there is a loss in quality when I import to iMovie 08 and play the HD video on quicktime. How can I prevent the loss in quality so that playback on my iMac equals playback directly from the video camera to the TV?

First, be sure to import at "Full" 1920x1080.
Second, when you "Share", pick "Share"/Using Quicktime. This will let you customize settings. In Quicktime Settings, pick AIC with an unlimited data rate. For a smaller file, you can also try h.264 with an very high data rate.
You might look at this old post for some details:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=7022027&#7022027

Colour loss when rendering.........

Dear Final Cutters,
I am losing color on text with glow and color-correction effects on it when I render. The footage is QuickTime, Integer (Little Endian) Timecode, Apple Intermediate Codec. Is there something to do with rendering text at this setting which would cause the colors to lose quality and intensity on text?
Stretch

Go to the tools menu and then assign profile. Choose the display profile that your monitor is using. This will effectively stop preview from doing any translation to your monitor. See if this matches what you are seeing when you upload to the web. If it does then somewhere in your upload, process, web server chain the profile is being removed from the jpg or the browser you are using ignores color profiles (most windows browsers ignore image color profiles, that's why adobeRGB profile images look like crap to most windows users when viewed in Explorer)
Ps if this is the case nothing is wrong you are just getting a preview of how most windows users will see your image on the web. Adjust to taste.
RB
Ps. Some good info and humor here:
http://www.rwboyer.com/RBDesign/Blog/Entries/2008/4/16_Color_Management_and_Other_Stupid_InternetTricks.html
Message was edited by: rwboyer

Quality Loss when saving Jpeg from Camera Raw

I am try to do some color correction on 400 wedding photos. I open like photos in Camera Raw then synchronize, make a few additional adjustments and then save the photos as psd files. When I save the files, the quality drops dramatically. I can see pixels and jagged edges (looks like steps) on anything curved. The photographer will not give me the RAW files, so I have to work with these high quality jpegs and I would prefer to use camera raw as it is nice and easy to fix many of the photos quickly. How can I save these files so as to not lose quality? Oh, I am on a Mac.
--K

Ramón,
now I am quite baffled. For years ago I conducted respective tests and demonstrated, that repeated saving with the same "quality" does not introduce image deterrioration; others did the same tests and came to the same result.
Now, to be sure, I did it again, and the result contradicts my earlier findings. Although the deterrioration is after five consecutive savings practically irrecognizabe without hugely amplifying it, it is there, and that is an issue of principle.
While it is possible, that I and others made some error in those tests, the question is (for me) what causes the difference.
I verified, that the encoding parameters are unchanged. Thus the difference must come from the calculation required to transform between the original pixel values and the encoded values by
a. the conversion between RGB and YCbCr,
b. the discrete cosine transform (a variation of Furier transform).
However, any differences resulting from the calculation (iteration, rounding) should be eliminated by the subsequent lossy step, the "quantization" (which is an euphemism for "throwing away most of the data"). Even if there is a difference between the first and second savings, there should not be any between the fourth and fifth savings - but there is.
One explanation could be, that the encoding and decoding functions work with different precision, though this sounds very outlandish.
Anyway, darn.
Re the encoding parameters: they *have to be* stored in the JPEG file, otherwise the data could not be decoded, except by that program, which knows the parameters. However, JPEG is not designed for human consumption but for computers (this fact makes testing a program, which reads or writes JPEG data a serious PITA). The metadata can be analyzed only by a hex editor, and one has to know the structure of that data.
Re knowing, if the file has to be compressed or not: JPEG is *always* encoded. There are different variants of the encoding method, but there is no "unencoded" version.

Quality loss when choosing Widescreen project settings. (raw footage is widescreen)

Hi all,
I am using Adobe Premiere Pro CS4.
I shot some footage in 16:9 format. when I view the original video it looks fine. Here is the problem: When I create a standard format video project in PP, it looks fine, but that cuts off the sides of the footage so of course I want to use the 16:9 format. However, when I create a new project and choose that 16:9 format, the video looks what I would call "fuzzy" in the preview window. Also when I export the video, it has the same problem.
I shot in 16:9 Standard HQ 570p.
I would appreciate the help!

>16:9 Standard HQ 570p
I have never seen 570p... what camera?
Read Bill Hunt on a file type as WRAPPER http://forums.adobe.com/thread/440037?tstart=0
What is a CODEC... a Primer http://forums.adobe.com/thread/546811?tstart=0
What CODEC is INSIDE that file? http://forums.adobe.com/thread/440037?tstart=0
Report back with the codec details of your file, use the programs below
For PC http://www.headbands.com/gspot/ or http://mediainfo.sourceforge.net/en
For Mac http://mediainfo.massanti.com/
Once you know exactly what it is you are editing, report back with that information... and your project setting, and if there is a red line above the video in the timeline, which indicates a mismatch between video and project
Also... if you do have HiDef and you are exporting to Standard Def, there WILL be a loss of quality

Quality loss when rendering to FLV or F4V

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for