Quantity Deduction Through QM

Hi Gurus,
I want to know about a scenerio in QM, as GR quantity is 100 qtls. and the material not follow the norms of the material, but we want to recive the material under daviation like we want to post and payment of 95 Qtls.only. What is the process in QM please suggest.
Thanks in advance.
AJAYKS

Hi
As per my understanding you want payemnt as per Qty that you have accepted.
Lets say GR quantity is 100 qtls.You have only accepted 95 Qty then vendor should get payement of 95 Qty.
This is possible when you have in QA32>UD>Stock posting  screen-->put 95 Qty in Unrestricted & put 5 in Return delivery.
Now
Use uer exit in MIRO  : block MIRO before UD posting is LMR1M001
Build the logic as per your requirement in MIRO.
But remeber one thing you can only block the payment for return delivery.
Regards
Sujit

Similar Messages

  • Deduction through INF0045

    Dear All,
    I am facing one problem related to deduction through Infotype 0045.
    <b>Problem Detail</b> -
    In case of Full & Final (Recovery) processing system showing error with
    a loan wage type 0045 (Message - A Loan Wage type in table RT should be
    deducted, however the remaining net amount was too small wage
    type /LEP, please lower the loan repayment in Infotype 0045, choose an
    amount that can be duducted.)
    Please suggest how we can recover complete balance Loan amount through
    infotype 0045 which are more than earnings in case of Full & Final
    (recovery) processing for a particular month.
    Waiting for your reply.
    Regards,
    Gaurav Kumar
    09911596677

    Hi Mr. Das,
    Thanx for your early reply.
    We would like to make complete repayment through infotype 0045 in payroll run.
    As per your suggestion we can do it by special repayment (externally) but we have requirement to deduct the same special repayment (internally).
    Regards,
    Gaurav Kumar
    09911596677

  • Non invoice related deductions through EDI

    I am trying to automate the cash application process via the receipt of the customer inbound 820 (using message type REMADV, type PEXR2002). I can successfully post payment, clear open items, and set up deductions relating to a specific invoice, but I haven't been able to post deductions unrelated to an invoice. Our customers often take deductions not related to a specific invoice at the same time as remitting payment for invoices. Has anyone managed to post 'independent' deductions when posting a payment advice via EDI?

    Hi Nile,
    Am trying to understand the process around using EDI 820 for incoming payments and clearing customer accounts.
    Would be great if you can share your expriences and also any documents that you might have.
    Thanks,

  • MK contract and received quantity (GR through call off PO)

    Hi,
    I have a MK (quantity) contract, and I call off with Purchase orders.
    Can somebody give me a transaction or a abap report name which
    is capable to show me: contract target quanity; PO order quantity AND
    GR quantity? The latter is the most important.
    Best regards, thank you in advance,
    Eric.

    Dear eric,
    Try to use ME3M, enter the material and plant, scope of list = ALLES.
    You need to combine with ME2M.

  • Batch quantity not deducting when FIRST date (for line item) is in future.

    Hi Folks,
                My requirement is when creating sales order for batch managed materials, if  i give any quantity with future date that is,
    if todays date is 02.07.2010 and if i create sales order..
    material    => mat1
    Quantity   => 20     
    Date   => 12.07.2010     (this is not required delivery date,this is first delivery date in schedule line for that item)
    Batch  => B1
    and initially if Batch B1 has quantity 100 ,after saving this sales order, the quantity must be 80.
    but its not deducting, for future dates ,thats why the same batch is showing quantity 100, next time
    when i m creating new sales order.where as it should show 80.
    where exactly the quantity deduction is carried out (include or PAI PBO modules).
    any hints.
    I appreciate your response.
    Thanks

    Hi Folks,
                My requirement is when creating sales order for batch managed materials, if  i give any quantity with future date that is,
    if todays date is 02.07.2010 and if i create sales order..
    material    => mat1
    Quantity   => 20     
    Date   => 12.07.2010     (this is not required delivery date,this is first delivery date in schedule line for that item)
    Batch  => B1
    and initially if Batch B1 has quantity 100 ,after saving this sales order, the quantity must be 80.
    but its not deducting, for future dates ,thats why the same batch is showing quantity 100, next time
    when i m creating new sales order.where as it should show 80.
    where exactly the quantity deduction is carried out (include or PAI PBO modules).
    any hints.
    I appreciate your response.
    Thanks

  • Quantity field not getting displayed for all document types

    Hi,
    I have made a configuration to include field Quantity(BSEG-MENGE) in the GL account line item display.When I ran the report for stock adjustment account(FAGLL03), only the following document types are showing quantity against them.
    WI- Inventory document
    WA-Goods Issue
    WE---Not showing quantity against (WE- Goods Receipt)
    Can any one please explain. I have seen the original document from FI document. The original document as well as FI document carries quantity.
    Thanks
    Aravind

    Hi Aravind,
    Check SAP notes  1063198 and 1117587.
    FAGLL03 display quantity which is updated in FAGLFLEXA, BSEG is not
    relevant in this case. This is clearly explained in the note 1063198.
    The quantity posts through to FI on the 'goods receipt' items, but not on the
    'invoice receipt' items.
    In the FI normally the Quantity is not a 'real' important field, as it
    is more related to the MM area.
    But in the old 'Profit Center Accounting' and the old' Special Ledger'
    the field has been important.
    As the same logic of these areas to 'store' the Quantity is also used
    in the NewG/L the field get only filled in the line, where it make
    'sense' from our point of view, because only in the 'goods receipt'
    lines a 'real' Quantity is posted to the system.
    So as before in the PCA and SL, now also in the NewG/L the Quantity is
    filled in the correct and important lines and postings.
    In the BSEG ('old document segment table') the field is filled 'just'
    as it is send to the FI, but this is not completely correct from the
    business point of view.
    This can also lead to issues with the reporting and summation to this
    field. So with creating the new logic in the NewG/L the 'correct'
    standard of the 'writing' for the Quantity has also been taken over.
    So in the end, the update and display is correct according  SAP standard behavior.
    Actually,Quantities within G/L are never reliable,
    because the purpose of FI is a view on the data according to amount
    but not according to quantity.
    In the FI normally the Quantity is not a 'real' important field, as it
    is more related to the MM area.
    I hope I could be of assistance.
    Regards,
    Fernando

  • Quantity field not getting update in PCA document for Goods Receipt

    We have the Purchase Account activated for our company code.
    For movement type 101 (Goods Receipt), I am getting the quantity field updated for GR/IR account and Stock Account (B/S item).
    But the quantity field is not getting updated for the "Purchase Account" and the "other offsetting PL A/C).
    Please advice whether I am missing something.
    Regards
    B.Mohanty

    Hi Aravind,
    Check SAP notes  1063198 and 1117587.
    FAGLL03 display quantity which is updated in FAGLFLEXA, BSEG is not
    relevant in this case. This is clearly explained in the note 1063198.
    The quantity posts through to FI on the 'goods receipt' items, but not on the
    'invoice receipt' items.
    In the FI normally the Quantity is not a 'real' important field, as it
    is more related to the MM area.
    But in the old 'Profit Center Accounting' and the old' Special Ledger'
    the field has been important.
    As the same logic of these areas to 'store' the Quantity is also used
    in the NewG/L the field get only filled in the line, where it make
    'sense' from our point of view, because only in the 'goods receipt'
    lines a 'real' Quantity is posted to the system.
    So as before in the PCA and SL, now also in the NewG/L the Quantity is
    filled in the correct and important lines and postings.
    In the BSEG ('old document segment table') the field is filled 'just'
    as it is send to the FI, but this is not completely correct from the
    business point of view.
    This can also lead to issues with the reporting and summation to this
    field. So with creating the new logic in the NewG/L the 'correct'
    standard of the 'writing' for the Quantity has also been taken over.
    So in the end, the update and display is correct according  SAP standard behavior.
    Actually,Quantities within G/L are never reliable,
    because the purpose of FI is a view on the data according to amount
    but not according to quantity.
    In the FI normally the Quantity is not a 'real' important field, as it
    is more related to the MM area.
    I hope I could be of assistance.
    Regards,
    Fernando

  • Withholding Tax on Down payment through F-58

    When we made the down payment having with withholding tax deduction
    through F-58(FBZ4) against down payment request clearing, if we give
    gross amount to the extent of Withholding tax showing as not assigned
    amount, If we give net amount clearing is happened properly.
    But if we use manual payment for down payment through F-48 against down
    payment request clearing gross amount is working fine. Same should be
    applicable in case F-58(FBZ4) also.
    for example we have created down payment request for Rs. 1,00,000/- and
    Tax code assigned for the payment 2% (Rs 2,000/-), at he time of down
    payment request clearing(F-58) if we give the amount 1,00,000/- we are
    not able to clear and make the net amount paid. If we give Rs.98,000/- it
    is working fine. But same logic not working in F-48.
    is this program error or standard SAP logic is like that.

    Dear,
    this is the SAP Standard System Design.
    If You create the DP using F-58, You will have to insert the bank amount minus the WT amount (net).
    If You create the DP using the transaction F-48, You can insert the total bank amount because pushing the button "Create DPs" the System will scorporate it, creating the WT line item.
    The result in both the cases is the same:
    001 50        0000113100 Dte Bank (domestic)                  9.000,00-
    002 29A      0000100214 Vendor                                    10.000,00
    003 50        0000177000 Withholding tax                          1.000,00-
    I hope this helps.Mauri

  • Deduct Bank Commission at the time of F-53 on Net amount

    Hi Experts,
    My client who want the bank commission deduction at the time of vendor outgoing payment on the net values. the bank commission is fix of Rs. 0.07 Paise  Per Rs. 1000/-
    The scenario is as below:
    Client who deduct the deduction at the time of  Invoice for e.g. can bhade, Sanstha anamat , Prakriya Kharch ,Vahtuk Bhade, Share anamat etc. this deduction are directly update the Accounting GL .
    after that the client pay the vendor dues amount. in this they deduct some deduction through Account (FI) (E.g. Sanstha Audit fee, Shikshan fund, machine anamat) & After deducting the Accounting deduction  they calculate bank commission on the net amount (Invoice amount - FI deductions =  Net amount)
    Dear Expert, Please help me to work out this problem. in sap at the time of invoice we deduct the deduction as per client required & get the vendor due amount properly.
    but at the time of vendor outgoing payment i had done the FI side deduction manually but i can't get the bank commission on the net dues amount. client required automatic bank commission deduction on the net amount. Please suggest me to workout  the issue.
    Warm regards,
    Dhananjay Rahane.

    Hi Friend,
    I know that the bank charges field is available on transaction F-53. but my business requirnment is differ. i have to calculate the bank commission on Net amount. ( Invoice amount - Accounting deduction = Pay net amount ). if we know the bank charges amount then it is possible through GL entry. but i have to calculate it automatically.
    please give the valuable solution & help me work out.
    Warm regards,
    Dhananjay

  • Notification quantity fields

    Hi,
    Please clarify me on the actual purposes of quantity fields in notification like Complaint quantity, Refernce quantity, Defect quantity internal, Defect quantity external and Return Delivery quantity.
    Please throw some light with actual use of these fields based on your experience. F1 help says something meaningless. Actually there is no check in Return delivery quantity field in notification and Quantity returned through 122 movement type.
    How can we capture operation wise defect quantity (internal and external) for in-process inspections.
    Is it possible to assign a reason code while we scrap a material like we assign during return material to vendor.
    Thanks
    Jessy Jason

    Hi,
    Following  are the meaning  of there fileds:
    1) Complaint  Quantity : This is the quantity  against with  you want to raise  the complaint  to vendor.  ex if the lot  is of say 1000 kgs and  you have  defects with 10 samples then your complaint quantity would be entire 1000. But for urgency you segregated the lot and found  the defective quantity as 200 then your complaint quantity will be 200 nos.
    2) Ref Quantity : This is the basic supplied quantity of lot, above case it will be 1000 kgs.
    3) Return delivery quantity : Even the defect is in 10 samples you can return entire quantity of 1000 nos, however if you segregated  and found 200 defects then in that case return delivery quantity is 200 nos. One can raise debit note for segregation activity.
    Best Regards,
    Shekhar

  • New to SAP PY - Question on the Pr Cl. for Deductions

    Hello All
    I am new to SAP PY and new to this forum too. I look forward to your advice and guidance to try and make a career in SAP HR.
    Scenario- My client wants to take out 401(k) and other pre tax deductions through IT 0014. I have copied some model wage types. How would I make sure that these wage types are pre tax. What Pr Cl should I use and what is the specification to be used.
    Also there are a bunch of Post Tax Deductions which need to be taken out too. Please advise on the Pr Cl on those WTs too.
    I would really appreciate any help from you all.
    Thanks

    I would implement the Benefits Module for this.  However, there is still wage type and tax model configuration needed.  Best way to start is copy SAP's model wage type using tcode OH11.  You can also use SAP's tax models as an example and copy them.  Both these modifications require some expertise in SAP and HR as it applies to the state involved, so you may want to work together with an HR business analyst very closely.  Some states do not allow pre-tax 401k, like Pennsylvannia.

  • Creating re-order quantity

    I want to send requisition to purchasing through min-max planned item for re-ordering the missing quantity specified by min-max report

    Hi,
    You can generate requisition for the Re-order Quantity suggested through the Min-max planning report,by setting the Restock to yes in the parameters.
    Further more,running the Requisition Import from Purchasing will fetch you the requisition in Approve/Unapproved status based on the Initiate Approval after Req import set to yes/no.Also check the profile INV: Replenishment Count Requisition Approval,set to Pre-approved/Approved/Incomplete.
    If Sourcing rules having been defined,then you can automate the whole process to create purchase order from the Re-order/Min-max planning.
    Let me know if in case you have any problem.
    Regards,
    Bala.

  • Problem with query

    Dear all,
    I have this query which returns me the quantity received through inventory transfer window against quantity sent out through the same window. There can be multiple receipts against one dispatch (Jobwork) and the receipts are linked through a udf which carries the docnum of the document through which the material went out for jobwork. Now my problem is that the query throws me the balance quantity per row i.e suppose material sent out 10 nos and received 5 times 2 nos. The query shows me 8 as balance in all the five rows whereas I want the query to show me 6 in the 2nd row, 4 in 3rd row and so on. I hope I have made myself clear: Kindly help me with this query.
    Select X.Docnum as "Outgoing Challan No", X.U_V_Code, X.U_V_Name, X.U_Vendor_Address, X.U_dl_trpt, X.DocDate, X.Filler as "From Whse", X.ItemCode, X.Dscription,
    X.Quantity, X.WhsCode as "To Whse", Y.Docnum as "Incoming Challan No", Y.U_Supp_Refno as "Vendor Challan No", Y.DocDate as "Receiving Date", Y.Rec_Quantity as "Received Quantity", Y.WhsCode as "Receiving Warehouse", (X.Quantity-Y.Rec_Quantity) as "Balance Quantity" From
    (SELECT T0.DocNum, T0.U_V_CODE, T0.U_V_NAME, T0.U_Vendor_Address, T0.U_dl_trpt, T0.DocDate, T0.Filler, T1.ItemCode, T1.Dscription, T1.Quantity, T1.WhsCode
    FROM OWTR T0  INNER JOIN WTR1 T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry WHERE T0.U_Challan is null and  T0.U_V_CODE is not null) as X Left Join
    (SELECT T0.DocNum, T0.U_V_CODE, T0.DocDate, T1.ItemCode, T1.Dscription, SUM(T1.Quantity)as "Rec_Quantity", T1.WhsCode,
    T0.U_Challan, T0.U_Supp_Refno FROM OWTR T0  INNER JOIN WTR1 T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry WHERE T0.U_Challan is not null and
    T0.U_V_CODE is null Group By T0.DocNum, T0.U_V_Code, T0.DocDate, T1.ItemCode, T1.Dscription, T1.WhsCode, T0.U_Challan, T0.U_Supp_Refno)
    as Y on X.docnum = Y.U_Challan and X.ItemCode = Y.ItemCode

    closed

  • /zp0 wagetype

    Hi,
    pension contribution deduction that is backdated into a previous year should write to wage type /ZP0, our pension scheme is not doing this.. can some one point me in right direction
    thanks

    Hi,
    In case of retro accounting in PF, we carry forward only the employee PF deduction through the wagetype /ZF5. We do not carry forward other wagetypes like Employer PF & Pension contribution as they are not needed. This is a typical behavior. Carrying forward of these wagetypes does not in any way affect the printing of PF Form 12A.
    Regards,
    Nishtha

  • Standard report for issued components

    Dear Experts,
                          In my master recipe i am using a component which is also produced through the process as a co-product, the component appears in equal quantities, once with a positive and then with negative sign (for the co-product). But the problem is in consumption reports like MCRE the 2 quantities cancel out each other giving consumption of the component as zero. I want the system to consider only the positive quantity issued through 261 movement and not consider the negative quantity which is actually received during GR. The issued batch and the received batches are different.
                          Is this standard SAP behaviour or shall i need to change any master data or any configuration to get the right report? Please suggest.
    Regards
    Sunit.

    Go to COOIS
    select the list documented Goods movement and execute based on your selection criteria
    In that report select the 261 and 262 movement only add the required field and save the layout as raw material consumption
    and set the layout as default
    when ever you see the documented goods movement in coois
    System will display only 261& 262 movement only

Maybe you are looking for