Query Caused no record

dear all
I have database block with two list items.
I am populating that list from record group. it is ok.
one in country and second is city
when i try to query record it is not.
frm-40350 query caused no records to be retrieved
frm-40301 query caused no records to be retrieved
please guide me how to cover this issue.
thanks.

Hi,
After entering data whether your storing the data into table.
this is my gtalk id [email protected]
Can you add it out,that would be better to help you out.
Regards
Sri

Similar Messages

Not able to see Query caused no records to be retrieved

I have created a form in master detail relation ship.
When there are no records form will give
frm 40301 Query caused no records to be retrieved.
Iam not getting this message
Otherthan this everything is working fine.
Can anyone help me in this.
Thanks
,in advance

see if this helps:
Form's messages not appearing in status bar

FRM 40350: Query Caused no records to be retrieved in INVTVTXN

Dear All,
When Trying to View the Material Distributions for the Transaction Type Sales Order Issue. I am unable to get the accounting entries for the Transaction. On selecting the form the error shows :
FRM 40350: Query Caused no records to be retrieved
Please help
Thanks
Dinesh

Ensure that the cost manager is running (Inventory -> Setup -> Transactions -> InterfaceManager )...and ensure that you are giving the correct date range.
normally you should be able to see distributions as Inv valuation Cr and Deferred Cost of Goods Sold Dr ...
Some times Cost Manager shows as Active but it does not process transaction records, take help from your system administrator/ DBA to get cost manager restarted.
Thanks,
Hrishikesh

FRM-40350: Query caused no records to be retrieved

hi
apps--12.0.6 os--IBM AIX on POWER Systems (64-bit)
When trying to find service request (e.g. 33599) throws a FORMS note: “FRM-40350: Query caused no records to be retrieved”. This is happening in FORMS.
Regards

When trying to find service request (e.g. 33599) throws a FORMS note: “FRM-40350: Query caused no records to be retrieved”. This is happening in FORMS.Some Service Requests Are Not Accessable - Error FRM-40350 [ID 602803.1]
Service Requests Cannot Be Retrieved When Using Folders - Error FRM-40350 [ID 744321.1]
How To Research An Item That Errors FRM-40350 And Cannot Be Queried In The Master Or Organization Items Form [ID 413104.1
Unable To Access Upgraded Service Request In the CSXSRISR Form [ID 462543.1]
R12: Cost Management Drilldown Throws ORA-01403: No data found [ID 782062.1]
FRM-92100 Error in The Workbench Tab After Find For A Service Request [ID 458115.1]
"Frm-40301: Query Caused No Records To Be Retrieved. Re-Enter" While Querying Some SRs In Create Service Request Form [ID 1324909.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

AQM query on Desktop recording

Hi All
I have a query regarding desktop recording
My setup has:
AQM : version 8.5.2
UCCX :vesion 8.5
cucm :version 8.5
AQM is not integraded with the AD and as per i am aware of for desaktop recording we need to assign a windows login in the AQM administrator for every agent .
Now in my case it is not integratewd with AD hence i can't use AD credential and if i use the Local windows mchine credential then i have to manually put is for every users which will cause issue during configuration.
My question is
1. Is there any other method i can do that without asking the user to share his/her windows machine credential,Is there a way so that i can create a common account in each machine say admin and give it a privelege for the desktop recording service and use the same common"admin" account in the AQM for every users.
If this is not possible is there any other alternate way to do that .
Regards
RC

Hi
AQM needs to know the windows username of each user, as this is what ties the calls that are recorded back to a particular user when you are searching for calls etc.
If you had the same account for each user, it would appear that all calls were made by the same agent... so no, it's not really possible. The desktop software also detects who is logging on to the PC console, so it's not a matter of changing the account the service runs as.
You say you are not integrated to AD, but are you not using AD at all for your desktop PC logons?
Aaron

Finding the Text of SQL Query causing Full Table Scans

Hi,
does anyone have a sql script, that shows the complete sql text of queries that have caused a full table scan?
Please also let me know as to how soon this script needs to be run, in the sense does it work only while the query is running or would it work once it completes (if so is there a valid duration, such as until next restart, etc.)
Your help is appreciated.
Thx,
Mayuran

Finding the Text of SQL Query Causing Full Table Scan

Using index in a query return few records than full table access

Today we have an issue with a query, when it use the ok index the returned are not all records that apply to where clause condition.
See bellow
explain plan for
select * from movdb.zan_m03 where
M00AF = TO_DATE('11/01/28','YY/MM/DD') AND
M00za = 10 AND
m00AC = 50 AND
M00AD between 136906 and 136999
SELECT * FROM TABLE(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 1882720105
| Id | Operation | Name |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ZAN_M03 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PK_ZAN_M03 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
2 - access("M00AF"=TO_DATE('11/01/28','YY/MM/DD') AND "M00ZA"=10 AND
"M00AC"=50 AND "M00AD">=136906 AND "M00AD"<=137141)
filter("M00AD"<=137141 AND "M00AD">=136906)
Note
- rule based optimizer used (consider using cbo)
20 rows selected.
The query above return only one row insted 1579 record that apply to this conditions.
When forcing a full table acess with a hint, the query return all records that apply, the 1579 record.
select /*+ FULL(zan_m03) */ M00AF, M00za, m00AC , M00AD from movdb.zan_m03 where
M00AF = TO_DATE('11/01/28','YY/MM/DD') AND
M00za = 10 AND
m00AC = 50 AND
M00AD between 136906 and 137141
Can you help me to identify what's happening?
I am with Oracle 10g R2 10.2.0.4 standard edition
the statistics are up to date
the opitimizer_mode are rule, but altering in session level to all_rows happens the same issue.
Nothing about corruption in the alert log.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Cristiano

Yes the query are the same and correct restriction for where clause are M00AD between 136906 and 137141.
I've pasted, by mistake, another test query
The corrects are:
select M00AF, M00za, m00AC , M00AD from movdb.zan_m03 where
M00AF = TO_DATE('11/01/28','YY/MM/DD') AND
M00za = 10 AND
m00AC = 50 AND
M00AD between 136906 and 137141
This use pk index and return one row
select /*+ FULL(zan_m03) */ M00AF, M00za, m00AC , M00AD from movdb.zan_m03 where
M00AF = TO_DATE('11/01/28','YY/MM/DD') AND
M00za = 10 AND
m00AC = 50 AND
M00AD between 136906 and 137141
This does a full table access and return 1579 records
I´ve been searching for wrong results bugs on my oracle support, but not found one that mentions something like our issue.
I checked the dba_tables and dba indexes and the number of rows are different, and I think this would be the same because it's is a pk.
Look this
SQL> select NUM_ROWS from dba_tables where table_name = 'ZAN_M03'
2 /
NUM_ROWS
228527878
select NUM_ROWS from dba_indexes where index_name = 'PK_ZAN_M03';
SQL> select NUM_ROWS from dba_indexes where index_name = 'PK_ZAN_M03';
NUM_ROWS
217510185
Is normal a index for pk having much fewer rows than table? I think not, but not sure.
Again
Thanks in advance
Regards
Cristiano

Query for getting records max reported timestamp and 2nd max report

query for getting records in between
max reported timestamp and 2nd max reported timestamp
HERE IS ALL RESULT SET
TIME DOMAIN
30:jun:2006:20:08:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:04 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:04 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:24 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:24 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:05 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:04 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:05 TOMCAT
PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAM PD_USER
30:jun:2006:20:08:25 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:25 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:24 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:04 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:24 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:05 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:05 TOMCAT
PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAM PD_USER
30:jun:2006:20:08:25 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:25 TOMCAT
QUERY RESULT TO COME
TIME DOMAIN
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
Message was edited by:
user517983

Hi,
can we write query like this.
1 select pd_user,PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAMP
2 from sp_process_detail_current spdc
3 where host_id='DSCP02469'and pd_user='TOMCAT'
4 and exists(
5 select PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAMP from sp_process_detail_current
6* having max(PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAMP)-spdc.PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAMP=0)
SQL> /
PD_USER PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAM
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45

How to get query from a record group

HI
do we get the query from which record groupis based on in oracle forms with out checking in to the properties.

Hello,
No, you cannot get the initial SELECT order from the Record Group.
Francois

How to modify query statement in record grp of LOV in standard form

Hi,
We are using Service contracts in Production environment.
Duplicate rows selected for LOV query.
By adding a line userenv('language') we solve the problem.
But the coding was written inside the standard "OKSITMSL.pll". Here For the Field "NAME", LOV
record group "CUST_SYSTEM" assigned dynamically based on
other fields "ITEMSEL.FILTER = SYSTEM" and "ITEMSEL.CUSTOMER_FILTER = CUSTOMER".
I have added piece of the details below.
Form is Standard form "OKSITMSL", Which is calling om parent form "OKSAUDET".
Form : OKSITMSL
Block : ITEMSEL
field : NAME
pll : OKSITMSL.pll
oksitmsl.pll coding-------------
ELSIF NAME_IN('ITEMSEL.FILTER') = 'System' THEN
If UPPER(Name_In('ITEMSEL.CUSTOMER_FILTER')) = 'CUSTOMER' then
l_group_name := 'CUST_SYSTEM';
Elsif UPPER(Name_In('ITEMSEL.CUSTOMER_FILTER')) = 'RELATED' then
l_group_name := 'REL_CUST_SYSTEM';
Elsif UPPER(Name_In('ITEMSEL.CUSTOMER_FILTER')) = 'BOTH' then
l_group_name := 'BOTH_SYSTEM';
Elsif UPPER(Name_In('ITEMSEL.CUSTOMER_FILTER')) = 'ALL' then
l_group_name := 'OKS_SYSTEM';
End If;
Set_Lov_Property('ITEMSEL_LEVEL', GROUP_NAME, l_group_name);
âCUST_SYSTEMâ Record group present in âOKSITMSLâ form.
I need the advice how to solve my problem by adding a line in query of "CUST_SYSTEM" record group without touching/alter standard form.
Thanks in advance.
Navas

thank you shadow,
I think you mean like below:
and trim(leading 0 from a.DD_DRX_BSID_NID) = nvl(trim(to_char(SUBSTR('00042',6,5),'XXXXXXXXX')),0)
and trim(leading 0 from a.DD_DRX_BSID_BSC) = nvl(trim(to_char(SUBSTR('00042',11,5),'XXXXXXXXX')),0) ))But i think it compares with all 0's record ... but that's not correct
Edited by: josh1612 on Dec 22, 2008 2:50 AM

SQL query to fetch records from 26 onwards

Want to know SQL query to fetch records from 26 onwards.

See the fifth entry on the FAQ page:
Re: How to attach a java bean in forms6i

Discoverer 4i: GL Query caused no data to be received

Hi,
E-Business 11.5.10.2 on Windows Server 2003 SP2
Discoverer 4i
I've set up Discoverer 4i and am currently using Discoverer Desktop to query the business areas. I can retrieve data from any business area apart from GL.
When I attempt to query GL I get an error message stating 'Query caused no data to be received'.
Has anyone encountered this before? Any help greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark

Hi,
It could be that these GL folders use row level security and the gl_security_pkg is not initialized.
Try creating a custom folder containing:
select gl_security_pkg.login_sob_id from dualLog in with the UK GL User responsibility and create a workbook based on this custom folder. If this returns a null row then the GL package is not properly initialized. Check that the "GL Set of Books ID" system profile is set for the responsibility. You can initilalize the package manually by adding the following text into the the "Initialization SQL Statement - Custom" system profile for the responsibility:
begin
gl_security_pkg.init;
end;Hope that helps,
Rod West

Sql Query to store record like warehoue wise items

Hi Experts
I want to ask you a sql query for inserting records from two table OITM and OWHS in a user definded table like OITW.
I have a table BINMASTER in which bin code are stored. Now I want to create a table Like OWHS where BIN Wise Item records to be stored Let See
Item01 Bin 01
Item02 Bin 01
Item03 Bin 01
Item01 Bin 02
Item02 Bin 02
Item03 Bin 02
Plz give your suggestions
Regards
Gorge

hi János Nagy
Thank for reply
your statement is fine with no where condition. But I want to insert in a UDT in which Code, Name are two field which should be unique for every record. I use following statement
Insert into (Code, name, Itemcode, ItemDescription, Bincode , Warehouse )
select ?, ?, T1.Itemcode, T2.ItemDescription, T2.Bincode , T3.WhsCode From Oitm T1, T2, Owhs T3
Here what I insert in Code and Name fields
Regards
Gorge

Unable to query a specific record

I have a form, with these code in when-new-form-instance trigger:
set_block_property('Block_A',default_where, where_clause);
execute_query;
The form is brought up in a query mode, brings the default set of records. But it does not allow me to query a specific record.
Here is what I did:
1. change the value of an 'ID' field in the form and excute the query.
2. a message box comes up asking me if want to save the change.
3. press 'No'. The form brings up the first record of the default set but not the record I am querying on.
I have set the property of the 'ID' filed: query allowed: Yes.
What is wrong here?

I believe your form module is using the WHERE condition set in the When-New-Form-Instance trigger.
When you change ID of the column and want to requery, reset the Block's where condition FIRTST before re-executing the query.

Query to find records with more than 2 decimal places

I have written the below query to find records with more than 2 decimal places, but it is returning records with decimal places 1 & 2.
The datatype of the AMT column is NUMBER (without any precision).
SELECT amt FROM amount_table
WHERE substr(amt, instr(amt, '.')) LIKE '.%'
       AND length(substr(amt, instr(amt, '.') + 1)) > 2Output:-
AMT
*41591.1*
*275684.82*
*64491.59*
*3320.01*
*6273.68*
*27814.18*
*30326.79*
131.8413635
162.5352898
208.5203816
8863.314632
22551.27856
74.716992
890.0158441
2622.299682
831.6683841
*1743.14*
2328.195877
3132.453438
5159.827334
3.236234727
37.784
Thanks

Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
create table amount_table
LINE_NUMBER        NUMBER not null,
FEE_AMT            NUMBER not null
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (60208, 41591.1);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (60213, 275684.82);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (60238, 64491.59);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (63026, 3320.01);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (59906, 6273.68);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (83111, 27814.18);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (83114, 30326.79);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112395, 131.8413634682);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112399, 162.5352898104);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112402, 208.5203815738);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112403, 8863.3146321954);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112406, 22551.2785551322);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112407, 74.716992);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112410, 890.015844079);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112411, 2622.2996817048);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112414, 831.6683840698);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112415, 1743.14);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112418, 2328.1958771886);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112419, 3132.4534379886);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112422, 5159.8273341686);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112423, 3.2362347266);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112426, 37.784);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112427, 198.7423503696);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112430, 0.7220848332);
insert into amount_table (LINE_NUMBER, FEE_AMT)
values (2112433, 12.4149375254);

Query Caused no record

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for