Query DNS ipv6

Server oracle linux 6.6
Oracle Enterprise 12c
With a sniffer I see that there are several requests DNS AAAA (ipv6) to my DNS Server local.
The query is : STANDARD QUERY 0X1212 AAAA "HOSTNAME"
The reply is : STANDARD QUERY RESPONSE 0X1212 SERVER FAILURE
In another server with similar features:
The query is : STANDARD QUERY 0X1456 AAAA "HOSTNAME"
The reply is : STANDARD QUERY RESPONSE 0X1456 NO SUCH NAME
From what I understand IPv6 queries always anticipate queries IPv4.
There is a way to change this order?
the idea is to avoid this unnecessary traffic even if it is minimal.
Thanks.

What you see is very common and also described in https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4074.txt
It most likely means that your DNS server is not configured to provide IPv6 AAAA records, or perhaps your systems have different /etc/hosts files, which you might want to compare. It might be interesting to find out what causes the IPv6 DNS queries, but you can probably ignore it in case it is only a cosmetic issue.
> From what I understand IPv6 queries always anticipate queries IPv4.
I don't know what you mean by that, but if you do not need IPv6, I suggest to try disabling IPv6 in the kernel by adding an appropriate kernel paramter line at system startup, or by modifying /boot/grub/grub.conf and adding the following:
ipv6.disable=1
You can eventually also do the following:
echo"install ipv6 /bin/true"> /etc/modprobe.d/ipv6_disabled.conf

Similar Messages

  • Critical: LDAP: query DNS result DNS Hard Error looking up e

    I am not having any luck when trying to connect to all 3 of our LDAP Servers...I get this error in the logs:
    Critical: LDAP: query DNS result DNS Hard Error looking up MyServer.Mydomain.com (A): NXDomain
    It is open through our Firewalls. I don't even see the Test Query reach our Firewalls...any suggestions what I am doing wrong?
    We were using Surfcontrol and it worked fine... :?:

    In Surfcontrol I put the IP without the DN and the query returns all the users.
    In IronPort when I put the IP without the DN and do an Accept query using my email address in the Recipient Address I get the above error.

  • Ironport WSA reached maximum failures querying DNS server

    I have been seeing an increased number of critical alerts on my Ironport indicating that it has reached the maximum number of failures querying the DNS server. 
    Has anyone seen this alerts before and/or know what causes them? I have not been able to find any information on the alert.
    Thanks

    We are seeing this alert as well, but we haven't had any complaints from the users.
    I had a TAC case in July this year due to "Application Fault Errors", and my TAC engineer told me I was experiencing bug CSCzv44813. The solution was to change to Google DNS and reboot the appliance.
    Now we are getting the "Reached maximum failures querying DNS server" messages from time to time.
    Are you also using Google DNS (8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4.) by any chance?

  • Exchange 2013 - 451 DNS query failed with error ErrorTimeout

    Hi all, I know that there are many similar topics in forum, but  my problem is a bit different.
    My environment : Exchange Server 2013 (Windows Server 2008 R2 Ent) , Domain Controller + DNS (Windows Server 2008 R2 Ent) . EX Server uses DC as preferred DNS Server .
    Sometimes, I cannot send email to customers / people of some domains, I get error in my MS Outlook :
    Delivery is delayed to these recipients or groups:
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    Subject: *****
    This message hasn't been delivered yet. Delivery will continue to be attempted.
    The server will keep trying to deliver this message for the next 1 days, 22 hours and 52 minutes. You'll be notified if the message can't be delivered by that time.
    Diagnostic information for administrators:
    Generating server: ex.mydomain.com
    [email protected]
    Remote Server returned '400 4.4.7 Message delayed'
    [email protected]
    Remote Server returned '400 4.4.7 Message delayed'
    Original message headers:
    Then I open Exchange Toolbox ==> Queue Viewer, what I see about messages which are sent to customerdomain.com :
    From Exchange Server command promt, I can query dns
    nslookup
    Default Server: mydc.mydomain.com
    Address: 192.168.10.2
    > set type=mx
    > customerdomain.com
    Server: mydc.mydomain.com
    Address: 192.168.10.2
    Non-authoritative answer:
    customerdomain.com MX preference = 0, mail exchanger = aspmx.l.google.com
    customerdomain.com MX preference = 5, mail exchanger = alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
    customerdomain.com MX preference = 5, mail exchanger = alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
    customerdomain.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = aspmx2.googleemail.com
    customerdomain.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = aspmx3.googleemail.com
    aspmx.l.google.com internet address = 74.125.200.27
    I can telnet to their mx server port 25 (of course they use gmail hosting) and send email to [email protected] normally.
    It just happen sometimes, with some domain (I can send/receive email with customerdomain.com normally before).
    How can I fix it ?

    Hi all,
    I think the problem because "DNS Suffix" ? although I uncheck "Append parent suffix of the primary DNS suffix" under Advanced TCP/IP Setting of network interface. Please see this:
    When I query by using dns client on DNS server:
    C:\Users\Administrator>nslookup
    Default Server: ad.mydomain.com
    Address: 192.168.0.3
    > gmail.com
    Server: ad.mydomain.com
    Address: 192.168.0.3
    Non-authoritative answer:
    Name: gmail.com
    Addresses: 2404:6800:4005:802::1015
    173.194.127.86
    173.194.127.85
    > set type=mx
    > gmail.com
    Server: ad.mydomain.com
    Address: 192.168.0.3
    Non-authoritative answer:
    gmail.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google
    .com
    gmail.com MX preference = 30, mail exchanger = alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google
    .com
    gmail.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google
    .com
    gmail.com MX preference = 5, mail exchanger = gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
    gmail.com MX preference = 40, mail exchanger = alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google
    .com
    alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com internet address = 173.194.72.26
    alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com internet address = 74.125.25.26
    gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com internet address = 74.125.68.27
    alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com AAAA IPv6 address = 2607:f8b0:4001:c07::1b
    When I query by using command promt on DNS server, but point the dns server to 8.8.8.8:
    C:\Users\Administrator>nslookup
    Default Server: ad.mydomain.com
    Address: 192.168.0.3
    > server 8.8.8.8
    Default Server: google-public-dns-a.google.com
    Address: 8.8.8.8
    > gmail.com
    Server: google-public-dns-a.google.com
    Address: 8.8.8.8
    Non-authoritative answer:
    Name: gmail.com.mydomain.com
    Address: 187.26.231.129
    > set type=mx
    > gmail.com
    Server: google-public-dns-a.google.com
    Address: 8.8.8.8
    itl.com
    primary name server = ns1.netnames.net
    responsible mail addr = hostmaster.netnames.net
    serial = 2011071103
    refresh = 10800 (3 hours)
    retry = 1800 (30 mins)
    expire = 3600000 (41 days 16 hours)
    default TTL = 21600 (6 hours)
    It append mydomain.com into query, I configured my dns server forward to 8.8.8.8

  • Powershell DNS Query

    Hi all,
    Can anyone help or give me an example for completing a DNS query across multiple DNS servers on different domains? For example server A is on DOMAIN A with a DNS server of 10.1.1.1 and Server B is on DOMAIN B with a DNS server of 10.1.1.2. The two domains
    can communicate with each other. What i would like to do is to complete an NSLOOKUP to Server A and have it check both DNS servers and show the results.
    Thanks in advance
    -Gaz

    Hi and thanks for the reply.
    I may have been a little unclear in my question. I am looking for a way to do this in powershell. Below is a portion of the script that i use to query DNS however i cannot seem to figure out how to query against multuple DNS servers in different
    domains or if it is even possible.
    $ping = new-object System.Net.NetworkInformation.Ping
    $Reply = $ping.send($strComputer)
    $name = [System.Net.Dns]::GetHostByName($strComputer).HostName
    $a = nslookup($strComputer)

  • SPF IPv4 IPv6 Cross-Checking Bug - Producing PermError, Rejecting Mails

    Messaging Server SPF Query with IPv6 and IPv4 cross checking not skipped, but rather producing a PermError. This would reject a lot of incoming mails which have both ipv4 and ipv6 spf records published.
    I suspect that it is a bug.
    Linux:
    bin/imsimta version
    Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)
    libimta.so 7u4-27.01 64bit (built 08:50:46, Aug 30 2012)
    Using /opt/sun/comms/messaging64/config/imta.cnf (compiled)
    Linux mx1.mathewsystems.com 2.6.18-028stab101.1 #1 SMP Sun Jun 24 19:50:48 MSD 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    Solaris x86:
    bin/imsimta version
    Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)
    libimta.so 7u4-27.01 64bit (built 08:47:11, Aug 30 2012)
    Using /opt/sun/comms/messaging64/config/imta.cnf (compiled)
    SunOS COMM1 5.10 Generic_147441-01 i86pc i386 i86pc
    ./spfquery -i 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e -v gmail.com
    Running SPF query with:
    IP address: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e
    Domain: gmail.com
    Sender: [email protected] (local-part: postmaster)
    HELO Domain: gmail.com
    01:09:35.41: ----------------------------------------------------------------
    01:09:35.41: SPFcheck_host called:
    01:09:35.41: source ip = 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e
    01:09:35.41: domain = gmail.com
    01:09:35.41: sender = [email protected]
    01:09:35.41: local_part = postmaster
    01:09:35.41: helo_domain = gmail.com
    01:09:35.41:
    01:09:35.41: Looking up "v=spf1" records for gmail.com
    01:09:35.42: DNS query status: Pass
    01:09:35.42: "v=spf1 redirect=_spf.google.com"
    01:09:35.42:
    01:09:35.42: Parsing modifier: "redirect = _spf.google.com"
    01:09:35.42: Processing macros in _spf.google.com
    01:09:35.42: Returned: _spf.google.com
    01:09:35.42:
    01:09:35.42: No match found, following redirect to _spf.google.com
    01:09:35.42: Recursing into SPFcheck_host
    01:09:35.42: ----------------------------------------------------------------
    01:09:35.42: SPFcheck_host called:
    01:09:35.42: source ip = 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e
    01:09:35.42: domain = _spf.google.com
    01:09:35.42: sender = [email protected]
    01:09:35.42: local_part = postmaster
    01:09:35.42: helo_domain = gmail.com
    01:09:35.42:
    01:09:35.42: Looking up "v=spf1" records for _spf.google.com
    01:09:35.43: DNS query status: Pass
    01:09:35.43: "v=spf1 include:_netblocks.google.com include:_netblocks2.google.com include:_netblocks3.google.com ?all"
    01:09:35.43:
    01:09:35.43: Parsing mechanism: " include : _netblocks.google.com"
    01:09:35.43: Assuming a Pass prefix
    01:09:35.43: Processing macros in _netblocks.google.com
    01:09:35.43: Returned: _netblocks.google.com
    01:09:35.43: Recursing into SPFcheck_host
    01:09:35.43: ----------------------------------------------------------------
    01:09:35.43: SPFcheck_host called:
    01:09:35.43: source ip = 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e
    01:09:35.43: domain = _netblocks.google.com
    01:09:35.43: sender = [email protected]
    01:09:35.43: local_part = postmaster
    01:09:35.43: helo_domain = gmail.com
    01:09:35.44:
    01:09:35.44: Looking up "v=spf1" records for _netblocks.google.com
    01:09:35.44: DNS query status: Pass
    01:09:35.44: "v=spf1 ip4:216.239.32.0/19 ip4:64.233.160.0/19 ip4:66.249.80.0/20 ip4:72.14.192.0/18 ip4:209.85.128.0/17 ip4:66.102.0.0/20 ip4:74.125.0.0/16 ip4:64.18.0.0/20 ip4:207.126.144.0/20 ip4:173.194.0.0/16 ?all"
    01:09:35.44:
    *01:09:35.44: Parsing mechanism: " ip4 : 216.239.32.0/19"*
    *01:09:35.44: Assuming a Pass prefix*
    *01:09:35.44: +"ip4" not supported for IPv6; returning PermError+*
    +01:09:35.44:   Mechanism failed with PermError+
    01:09:35.44:
    01:09:35.44: SPFcheck_host is returning PermError
    01:09:35.45: Returned from recursion with status: PermError
    01:09:35.45: Returning with status: PermError
    01:09:35.45: Mechanism failed with PermError
    01:09:35.45:
    01:09:35.45: SPFcheck_host is returning PermError
    01:09:35.45: Returned from recursion with status: PermError
    01:09:35.45:
    01:09:35.45: SPFcheck_host is returning PermError
    01:09:35.45: ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Mathew
    Edited by: 994254 on 15.03.2013 17:18

  • Manage Windows Server 2008 DNS role

    Hi,
    I'm testing Windows Server 2008 Server Core.
    The primary role of my server is DNS Server. Usign command line the dns was installed and configured.
    Now I'll be manage the dns usign mmc dns snap-in from another computer in the same subnet.
    When I register the DNS server on this computer an access deny error occured.
    Can somenone help me to grant remote machine to open this connection?
    For testing access on Windows server 2008 computer I have open rdp connection. Firewall service is disable.
    Thanks in advanced.
    Marco

    I got more or less the same:
    I joined a Core server to my W2K3 Domain.
    I promted the core server as  the 2nd  Domain controller
    I can now use nslookup to query DNS on the core server
    But when try to manange DNS with a dns MMC snapin i get access denied (you do not have permission to access this dns server)
    The Ip settings seem to be fine
    DC01 (w2k3)
     Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
     Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/1000 MT Network Connection
     Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0C-29-4A-F6-5A
     DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
     IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.3
     Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.192.0
     Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.8
     DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.3
    Core Server (W2K8) CTP july
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/1000 MT Network Connection
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0C-29-CF-36-A5
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80:19a:b7c5:6d00:bb99%2(Preferred)
    IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.2(Preferred)
    Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.192.0
    Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.8
    DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : ::1
                                        10.0.0.2
                                        127.0.0.1
                                        10.0.0.3
    NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    I'm a little bit lost,

  • WLC discovery using DNS

    Hi
    Has anyone successfully got AP's discovering the WLC using the DNS name CISCO-LWAPP-CONTROLLER?
    I cant seem to get the dns server to work properly. I added a host called CISCO-LWAPP-CONTROLLER but it keeps appending the domain name to the end of it. I notice that the documentation states the discovery looks for CISCO-LWAPP-CONTROLLER@localdomain
    I'm using MS DNS server. Can anyone help or provide a screenshot of the correct setup on dns.
    Thanks.

    It was the .localdomain part causing me problems. When I captured packets I noticed that the AP was querying DNS for CISCO-LWAPP-CONTROLLER and the DNS respone was "not found". NSLOOKUP from a client gave the same response, but clients in the Active Directory domain resolved the address.
    I added the DHCP option DOMAIN NAME with the name of my AD domain. The AP then queried for CISCO-LWAPP-CONTROLLER.test.co.uk and this worked.
    So I summary I had
    DHCP scope for AP's.
    DNS servers in options
    Defailt Gateway in options
    Domain Name in options

  • No DNS lookup for MX, A, AAAA or A6?

    Good day folks,
    Does SJS MS 6.2 support querying DNS for MX,A,AAAA or A6 records for the domain specified in the SMTP mail from:<[email protected]>? Exim and sendmail support this measure as a means of reducing spam but I can't find the equivalent for SJS MS 6.2. mailfromdnsverify on the tcp_local channel only sets up verfication of existence of the domain itself.
    Cheers

    Hi Shane,
    Let me take this piece by piece:
    "Really? That's not a feature I've ever actually heard that either of these products have. I can't imagine how it might impact performance. Badly, I strongly suspect."
    The following is an extract from the central mail servers' SMTP dialogue with my MS 6.2:
    *** START MESSAGE ***
    This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
    Message-id: <000001c73417$3ddaf380$0100007f@localhost>
    Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:55:29 -0500
    From: Ethan Edwards <[email protected]>
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: What IS 0EM Software And Why D0 You Care?
    Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
    Recipient address: [email protected]
    Original address: [email protected]
    Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
    Diagnostic code: smtp;553 5.1.8 <[email protected]>... Domain of sender address [email protected] does not exist
    Remote system: dns;centraldnsserver.mycentraldomain.com(TCP|mymailserveripaddress|62084|centralmailserveripaddress|25) (centralmailserver.um.edu.mt ESMTP CSCMAIL/External server ready)
    *** END MESSAGE ***
    "No, if we had to query every server that mail appears to come from, to check the validity of that mail address, we'd never be able to process mail in any quantity. I strongly doubt that any other product does as you suggest, either"
    This kind of checking is done on every message by mail servers running sendmail that host about 500 users.
    "How about SpamAssassin?
    RBL?
    Greylisting?"
    I think that these techniques all get past the SMTP stage - I want better handling at the SMTP stage.
    "If your central systems accept mail addressed to fake users, then that's a configuration error on their part, assuming that they can know all the real users."
    What I intended is that the mail servers reject external, incoming mail from source addresses that include domains that only have SOA records.
    Finally, regarding the blah123.com example: this domain has no SOA record so mailfromdnsverify works in rejecting the incoming e-mail at the SMTP stage. But try these:
    pipex.co.uk
    fstngt.org
    lists.midterme.com
    com.br
    net.my
    Thanks for keeping up this discussion.
    Cheers,
    Etiennen

  • Finding LDAP server names by DNS lookup.

    Hi,
    I'm very new with JNDI and DNS
    We are hardcoding the ldap server name in our configuration to connect to the Active directory, but the requirement is to know the ldap server name dynmaically by querying the DNS server.
    The input given to us are below.
    Dns domain : indbank.is.
    SRV RRecord : ldap.tcp.
    Query dns : ldap.tcp.indbank.is.
    The domain controller should be found by a DNS lookup for the domain, then a DNS for Domain controllers that advertise the service, then try to see if the domain controllers areanswering, and if so choose the one with the fastest answer time (to avoid choosing a domain controller over WAN).
    Kindly help me.I am beginner and some code sample and tip will be welcome. :)
    Thanks in advance.
    Hiubert

    Thanks a lot to All.
    My code is as follows...
    import javax.naming.*;
    import javax.naming.directory.*;
    import java.util.*;
    public class dns1
         public static void main(String[] args)     {
              try {
                   Hashtable env = new Hashtable();
                   env.put("java.naming.factory.initial","com.sun.jndi.dns.DnsContextFactory");
                   env.put("java.naming.provider.url", "dns://indbank.is");
                   DirContext ctx = new InitialDirContext(env);
                   System.out.println("Intial context created...");
                   Attributes attrs = ctx.getAttributes("_ldap._tcp.indbank.is",new String[] {"SRV"});
                   System.out.println("Attributes are been retrieved...");
                   for (NamingEnumeration ae = attrs.getAll();ae.hasMoreElements();)
                        Attribute attr = (Attribute)ae.next();
                        String attrId = attr.getID();
                        System.out.println("Attribute ID retrieved is" + attrId);
                        for (Enumeration vals = attr.getAll();vals.hasMoreElements(); System.out.println(attrId + ": " + vals.nextElement()));
                   ctx.close();
              catch(Exception e)
                   System.err.println("Problem querying DNS: " + e);
                   e.printStackTrace();
    The code runs fine and I get the output as follows
    0 100 389 ib500ad1.indbank.in
    0 100 389 ib500ad2.indbank.in
    I have following questions
    1) Do these servers which are returned are the domain controllers or the ldap servers.?(or both domaincontrollers and ldap server are same)
    2) how to extract the server name alone from this string.
    3) If these two server names are domain controllers then how can I query for a DNS for Domain controllers that advertise the service, then try to see if the domain controllers are answering, and if so choose the one with the fastest answer time (to avoid choosing a domain controller over WAN).
    Thanks in advance.
    -Hiubert

  • Integrated DNS role not installed

    Hi all,
    I installed an additional DC but the DNS role was not installed :
    In the installation wizard, I selected the DNS server option in "Additional domain controller options".
    After successfull installation and reboot, I had only 1 role active directory domain services.
    Could you give hints where I should look at first.
    Note : in the installation gui, it told me "there is currently 5 dns servers". I don't know yet where they are located. Also I have only 3 DCS in the domain (
    nltest /dclist: )
    thanks

    Hi,   
    In addition to other’s suggestions, we can use nltest command or nslookup command tool to query all DNS server in AD forest.
    For detailed information about how to use these command to query DNS list in a forest, the following link would be helpful:
    How can I find out the all DNS, DFS servers and DHCP servers in my AD domain?
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/47c03408-848d-43f7-8902-77cef45e75de/how-can-i-find-out-the-all-dns-dfs-servers-and-dhcp-servers-in-my-ad-domain?forum=winserverDS                                                               
    Best Regards,
    Erin

  • DNS configuration for GSS

    Hi,
    I am newbee to GSS. I would like to deploy the GSS in my datacenter.
    I would like to know the DNS configuration example for domain.
    ex:
    www.abc.com
    What records need to configured with detail script. beacause i dont have experience in DNS server configuration.
    I am looking for positive update.
    Regards
    sateesh kumar.k
    i

    Typical flow is as follows
    1. Client will hit their DNS servers (configured on their machines as primary/backup dns server).
    2. "Client's DNS server" will query "DNS server authoritative for abc.com" for www.abc.com.
    3. "DNS server authoritative for abc.com" will ask "client's DNS server" to query "GSS - Authoritative for www.abc.com"
    4. "Client's DNS server" will query GSS for www.abc.com.
    5. GSS will send the ip add of www.abc.com (which should be configured on ACE as VIP).
    6. "Client's DNS server" will handover this VIP to client
    7. Client will hit the VIP configured on ACE (for application www.abc.com).
    Syed iftekhar Ahmed

  • FYI: Manually provided DNS addresses are higher priority than DHCP's

    As an FYI to folks here concerned about the issue, manually entered DNS addresses do indeed supercede any provided by DHCP despite what you might be led to believe by the appearance of the Network->Advanced->DNS preference pane.
    When you manually enter a DNS server address in Mac OS X Leopard's Network preference pane, the manually entered address(es) appear below any DHCP-provided addresses (which are shown in grey as they are unchangeable), leading one to assume that DHCP-provided addresses always have priority over any a user may specify.
    However, a check of the /etc/resolv.conf file generated by Mac OS X shows that in fact user-provided DNS addresses will supercede any provided by DHCP.
    As an example, if your router promotes itself as a DHCP server, its IP address, say "192.168.0.253," will appear, greyed out, in the Network->Advanced->DNS preferences pane.
    If you then add, say, OpenDNS' addresses of "208.67.222.222" and "208.67.220.220," the preferences window will show:
    192.168.0.253 (greyed out)
    208.67.222.222
    208.67.220.220
    But the generated /etc/resolv.conf will show the order Mac OS X will actually reference the servers is:
    nameserver 208.67.222.222
    nameserver 208.67.220.220
    nameserver 192.168.0.253
    While this is non-intuitive with respect to how the addresses are displayed in the preference pane, it is exactly the way one would hope things would work - allowing you to specify DNS servers to be used in lieu of any a router provides, especially handy if the router propagates the address of a DNS server that is having issues or is simply overloaded or offline.
    Note that as I do not have an unpatched copy of Leopard available, I cannot say if this has always been Mac OS X's behavior or if this ordering was added by Security Update 2008-005.
    Regardless, this also means no special modifications are required to try to "turn off" the honoring of DHCP-provided DNS server addresses.

    Topher Kessler wrote:
    That's good to know. However, users may wish to solely provide their own DNS servers and not have the chance that in case their DNS servers are unreachable they end up using the default one.
    that's the problem. there is no way to easily remove the default DHCP provided DNS server. there is [a hack|http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20080725172011439&query=dns] that has been discussed in several threads but it can break various functions.
    I guess one option would be to just add more custom DNS servers to ensure they get used over the default one.
    That's the only reasonable thing to do.

  • Info on requesting IPv6 "Network Prefix"

    Hi, When I got this TNet AC-1900 (TEW-818DRU) router a year ago IPv6 wasn't on my mind at the time. Of course now every Trendnet -ac based router supports DHCPv6-PD except for my model. I specfically need to get a LAN Network Prefix and DNS Server for it. When I do call Customer Support, should I just ask for that and they will understand? Or should I explain that I need a IPv6 delagted address for my home network via my router and that DHCPv6-PD isn't an option for my needs? I imagine I can just use the DNS IPv6 server that I can find via Google for Comcast (2001:558:feed::1). Thanks!- Rob

    Leave the physical files on the main network storage, do import from there into the LR catalog.
    Put the LR catalog on the SSD drive (if you already have a catalog, you can simply move this (is a folder structure with files) to the SSD).
    Put the Camara raw cache on the SSD (this can be set using the general preferences panel).
    In essence once imported into the catalog, the physical image file is left alone, you work on rendered previews (in the previews directory structure) and when you start developing theimage a rendered high-res image for development is created (in the cache directory) and used from then on.
    So by putting the catalog and the cache on the SSD you get maximum perofrmance once imported and rendered.
    Wrt SSD's check the site of lloyd chambers (www.macperformanceguide.com), altough focused on mac's, his experience with SSD's can be helpful.
    Jan R. Smit
    www.fromklicktokick.com

  • IPV6 support IOS

    Dear Sir,
    I have the ASA5580-20,ACE-4710 & IPS-4260 devices now we are planning to implement IPV6.
    Below IOS we have in my devices ----
    Asa831-smp-k8.bin
    Ips-k9-7.0-2-e4
    C4710ace-mz.a4-2-0.bin
    Please which version IOS will support for the above devices.
    Please help me.
    Thanks & Regards
    Srinivas

    Hello,
    I agree with jsmall123 ( 5 stars for that answer )
    Go to 9.0(1) or later as you will get:
    -OSPFv3 support
    -DNS IPv6 inspection
    -SSL/IKEv2 support to the outside interface
    -NAT setup
    -Merged ACL setup for both IPv4 and IPv6
    etc
    I would not recommend the 8.3 track, it's really buggy.. Try 8.4 or later
    IPS sensor support IPv6 since 6.2 but go to the latest to get the new features ( not related to IPv6) and to fix as many bugs as possible
    Regards,
    Julio Carvajal
    Advanced Security Trainer

Maybe you are looking for