Query Group in Query Category different with Authorization's group number

Hi All,
In Authorization screen, it allowed to authorize up to 20 query group
Whereas in Query Category window, it has only max 15 query group.
Anyone has idea on why is the difference?
Thanks in advance,
MH

You have a very good point. I believe something must be for system to use during development. You may post a development request to see if the next version could have matched numbers of query groups. The forum is on this link:
/community [original link is broken]
Thanks,
Gordon
Edited by: Paulo Calado on Jun 19, 2009 3:33 PM

Similar Messages

Query result different with profit and loss statement

Hi all,
I run query Sum(JDT1.Debit - JDT1.Credit), and then compare the query result with the profit and loss statement, and there is different.
The difference is about 0.01.
At SAP, the Decimal places is set to 2.
I already checked the data, and their amount in 2 decimal.
Do anyone know such problem and what kind of query must I use so the result can be compared with the profit and loss statement ?
Thx.

Riny,
I am glad you found the issue
Suda

SAP BO WebI Report on top of BI Bex Query with Authorization Variable

Hi,
We are trying to restrict row level data using BI 7.0 analysis authorization concept. We have an authorization variable in the Bex query and is working perfect in Bex Analyzer as well as in RSRT.
Now we are trying to achieve the same thing in BO webI. We created an Universe using Authentication Mode SSO. We are on BOXI 3.1 and implemented SSO. When we try to run the query in WebI we get the error
"A database error occured. The database error text is: Error in MDDataSetBW.GetCellData..(WS 10901)"
Just for testing purpose, when we use query filter in WebI and use Values from List, it is showing only the authorized value it supposed to show and runs well with that value selected. But we have to achieve this without the query filter in WebI.
So are we missing some thing here or any patch issue? Please share if you have done this type of reports in BO.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Moorthy.

Yes I did run MDXTEST and it gives error as 'you do not have sufficient authorization'. The reason it is giving, I guess and we are debugging that to confirm, is first it looks for 0BI_ALL and throws error which is not the case in Bex. See the following trace in RSRT trace.
InfoObject Properties Defined
Reading of Directly Assigned Authorizations
Direct Assignment Does Not Include Universal Authorization 0BI_ALL
Reading the Indirect Assignments with Authorization Object S_RS_AUTH
Does user have OBI_ALL?
No, the User Does Not Have Universal Authorizion 0BI_ALL
Negative Entry in SU53 Result of Failed Check for 0BI_ALL
Indirect assignments found; no universal authorization
Reduction of Authorization Dimensions on Characteristics in InfoProvider
Reduction Successful
Thanks!
Moorthy

Copying a query from different user group

masters,
is it possible to copy a query from different user group?
if so please tell me how
thnks!

The query made from SQVI is only intended for individual use. It cannot be transported and there is no concept of Global/Standard area. To be able to transport or share the query to other users is by converting it to SAP Query wherein the source of data will also be converted to an Infoset. Remember that is done in the Standard query area. To do this, go to SQVI-> click SAP Query then go to menu Query -> Convert Quickviews... Select your Quickview queries and provide and infoset name.

Trial Balence amount is different with query of JDT1 amount

Hi all,
I try to get summary from JDT1 for a period, but I find the debit amount is different with Trial Balance. does anybody knows what's happen ? please help.
the queries is this :
SELECT sum(T1.[Debit]), sum(T1.[Credit]) FROM OJDT T0 INNER JOIN JDT1 T1 ON T0.TransId = T1.TransId INNER JOIN OACT T2 ON T1.Account = T2.AcctCode WHERE T2.[FatherNum] = 'A01' and T0.[DueDate] >= '1/1/09' and T0.[DueDate] <= '12/31/2009'

Hi,
Welcome you post on the forum.
Try tis:
SELECT sum(T1.Debit), sum(T1.Credit) FROM OJDT T0 INNER JOIN JDT1 T1 ON T0.TransId = T1.TransId INNER JOIN OACT T2 ON T1.Account = T2.AcctCode WHERE T2.FatherNum = 'A01' and T0.RefDate >= '1/1/09' and T0.RefDate <= '12/31/2009'
Thanks,
Gordon

Need to return data from a query in different ways - Please help

We are using 10g R2
I have a proc as follows that has a query with over 100 values in the select clause:
proc one( input param1, input_param2,.... output_cursor )
as
begin
open cursor for
select ...about 100 values with most of them being calculated
from table1, view 1, table2, table 3, view 2 ...
where ....
and table1.col1 = input param1
and table1.col2 = input param 2
and view1.col5 = input param5...
end;
I need to return the data that comes from the above query in different formats, columns for a report would be different from columns for screen A and different for screen B. I need only certain columns for a report and different set of columns for another screen. I have wrapper procs that get different input params. From the wrapper procs I intend to call the above proc but would like only selected values.
How can I accomplish this? Since my main goal is to select different columns for each wrapper I was thinking of insert the data from the above proc into global temp table and selecting whatever columns and order I want from the wrappers.
What do you think? Any other solutions?
Thanks
Edited by: user565033 on Jan 21, 2013 7:50 PM

You need to clearly separate roles and responsibilities. The PL/SQL code that creates and supplies a cursor handle is server code tasked to supply data. The code that makes the call for server data, is responsible for formatting and rendering that data.
Thus moving data formatting into the server code needs to be question. Simple example. Cursor does not return invoice date as a date - but formats it into a string using TO_CHAR().
This works for client1 - as that is the date format expected. However, client2 has different International settings and specifies a different date format. Invoice date, formatted into a string by the server, now renders in the wrong format on client2.
Server code should not be concerned with rendering and formatting of data send to a client.
As for the idea to use a global temp table is ..., well to put it nicely, it smells. Badly.
The single most expensive operation on a database platform is I/O. And now you want to read server data and write it to temporary storage, and the read data from temporary storage to return to the client? What on earth for!? Why purposefully increase the size of the I/O workload? Why decrease performance and undermine scalability?
Provide a proper abstraction interface to the client. Enable it to specify (as simplistically as possible) what it wants ito data. There are a number of ways to design and implement this in PL/SQL. Simplistic example:
SQL> create or replace package Employees as
2
3          EMP_FULL_DETAILS        constant integer := 1;
4          EMP_BASIC_DETAILS       constant integer := 2;
5
6          procedure GetEmpByID(
7                  cur out sys_refcursor,
8                  empID in emp.empno%type,
9                  template in integer default EMP_BASIC_DETAILS
10          );
11
12          procedure GetEmpByName(
13                  cur out sys_refcursor,
14                  empName in emp.ename%type,
15                  template in integer default EMP_BASIC_DETAILS
16          );
17 end;
18 /
Package created.
SQL>
SQL> create or replace package body Employees as
2
3 type TArray is table of varchar2(32767);
4
5 TemplateList       constant TArray :=
6          new TArray(
7                  'EMPNO, ENAME, JOB, MGR, HIREDATE, SAL, COMM, DEPTNO ',
8                  'EMPNO, ENAME, JOB '
9          );
10
11 procedure GetEmpByID(
12          cur out sys_refcursor,
13          empID in emp.empno%type,
14          template in integer default EMP_BASIC_DETAILS
15 ) is
16          sqlSelect       varchar2(32767);
17 begin
18          sqlSelect :=
19                  'select '||TemplateList(template)||
20                  'from emp where empno = :empID';
21
22          open cur for sqlSelect using empID;
23 end;
24
25 procedure GetEmpByName(
26          cur out sys_refcursor,
27          empName in emp.ename%type,
28          template in integer default EMP_BASIC_DETAILS
29 ) is
30          sqlSelect       varchar2(32767);
31 begin
32          sqlSelect :=
33                  'select '||TemplateList(template)||
34                  'from emp where ename like :empName';
35          open cur for sqlSelect using empName;
36 end;
37
38
39 end;
40 /
Package body created.
SQL>
SQL> var c refcursor
SQL>
SQL> exec Employees.GetEmpByID( :c, 7499 );
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> print c
     EMPNO ENAME      JOB
      7499 ALLEN      SALESMAN
SQL>
SQL> exec Employees.GetEmpByName( :c, 'A%', Employees.EMP_FULL_DETAILS );
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> print c
     EMPNO ENAME      JOB               MGR HIREDATE                   SAL       COMM     DEPTNO
      7499 ALLEN      SALESMAN         7698 1981/02/20 00:00:00       1600        300         30
      7876 ADAMS      CLERK            7788 1987/05/23 00:00:00       1100                    20
SQL>

Same query giving different results

Hi
I m surprised to see the behaviour of oracle. I have two different sessions for same scheema on same server. In both sessions same query returns different results. The query involves some calculations like sum and divisions on number field.
I have imported this data from another server using export / import utility available with 9i server. Before export every thing was going fine. Is there some problem with this utility.
I m using Developer 6i as the front end for my client server application. The behaviour of my application is very surprizing as once it shows the correct data and if I close the screen and reopen, it shows wrong data.
I m really stucked with the abnormal behaviour. Please tell me the possiblities and corrective action for these conditions.
Regards
Asad.

There is nothing uncommitted in both the sessions. But still different results are returned.
I m sending u the exact query and result returned in both sessions.
Session 1:
SQL> rollback;
Rollback complete.
SQL> SELECT CC.CREDIT_HRS,GP.GRADE_PTS
2 FROM GRADE G, COURSE_CODE CC, GRADE_POLICY GP
3 WHERE G.COURSE_CDE=CC.COURSE_CDE
4 AND G.SELECTION_ID=45 AND G.GRADE_TYP=GP.GRADE_TYP
5 AND G.TERM_PROG_ID=17 AND GP.TERM_ID=14
6 /
CREDIT_HRS GRADE_PTS
3 4
4 3.33
4 3.33
3 4
3 4
3 4
3 4
7 rows selected.
SQL>
SESSION 2:
SQL> rollback;
Rollback complete.
SQL> SELECT CC.CREDIT_HRS,GP.GRADE_PTS
2 FROM GRADE G, COURSE_CODE CC, GRADE_POLICY GP
3 WHERE G.COURSE_CDE=CC.COURSE_CDE
4 AND G.SELECTION_ID=45 AND G.GRADE_TYP=GP.GRADE_TYP
5 AND G.TERM_PROG_ID=17 AND GP.TERM_ID=14
6 /
CREDIT_HRS GRADE_PTS
3 4
4 3.33
3 4
3 4
3 4
3 4
6 rows selected.
SQL>
U can see in session 1, seven rows are returned while in session 2 six rows are returned. I have issued a rollback before query to be sure that data in both sessions is same.

Sinlge select query in different schemas for same table(Indentical Structu)

Scenario :
Table XYZ is created in Schema A
After an year, the old data from the previous year would be moved to different schema. However in the other schema the same table name would be used.
For eg
Schema A contains table XYZ with data of 2012 yr
Schema B contains table XYZ with data of 2011 yr
Table XYZ in both the schemas have identical structure.
So can we fire a single select query to read the data from both the tables in effective way.
Eg select * from XYZ where date range between 15-Oct-2011 to 15-Mar-2012.
However the data resides in 2 different schema altogether.

Thanks for the reply
Creating an view is an option.
But my problem, there is ORM layer(either Hibernate or Eclipse Top Link) between the application and the database.
So the queries would be formed by the ORM layer and are not hand generated.
So i cannot use view.
So is there any option that would allow me to use single query on different schema's ?

Error When Run ABAP Query in Different Client

Hi ABAPers,
Currently I develop ABAP Query using SQ01 / SQ02 / SQ03.
Everything goes well, and I have already test that the query work well. The query can be execute and show the result correctly.
My peer in same SAP system, but different client, run the same query. As I know that query is same with ABAP program which is client independent, can be execute across client. But then the runtime error show up.
The error said that
Exception condition "NO_POSITION_FOUND" raised.
Can anybody told me what's happened here, and how can I resolve this problem?
Thank you in advance
Regards
Hadi

Hi,
Since you are testing it in other client,i think due to data inconsistency you are getting that error.
Try to check the corresponding tables in both clients and can verify.
Cheers,
KK.

Different results for same query on different servers

1. database being converted from 7.3.4 to 9.2
2. query is executed on both servers
3. different results!
The tables and data are the same, and indexes are setup on new server. EXPLAIN PLAN was run on both but with (predictably) widely different results.
I know, not much detail here, but has anyone ever ran into anything like this?
Thanks,
Pat

Folks,
Here is the relevant information for this problem. The attributes have been changed for confidentiality. If you need any other information let me know.
Thanks,
Pat
Query:
SELECT
one,two,three,four,a.five,six,seven,
a.eight,a.nine,
to_char(ten,'99999.99'),to_char(eleven,'99999.99'),
to_char(twelve,'99999.99'),to_char(thirteen,'99999.99'),
fourteen,fifteen,sixteen,seventeen,eighteen,
nineteen,twenty,twentyone
FROM
table1 a,
table2 b
WHERE
a.five = b.five
AND one = 'X'
AND six = ' '
AND three != 12345
AND three IN
(SELECT DISTINCT
three
FROM table3
WHERE
one = 'X'
AND twentytwo = 'XYZ'
AND twentythree != 0
AND twentyfour != 0
AND twentyfive = 'Y'
AND (a.five IN
(SELECT DISTINCT
five
FROM table1
WHERE
one = 'X'
AND three IN (12345)
Table1:
one          varchar2(1)     not null     PK
two          varchar2(20)     not null     PK
three          number(5)     not null     PK
four          number(2)     not null     PK
five          number(6)     not null     PK
six          varchar2(4)     not null     PK
seven          number(4)     not null
eight          varchar2(8)     not null
nine          date          not null
ten          number(7,2)
eleven     number(7,2)
twelve     number(7,2)
thirteen     number(7,2)
Table2:
five          number(6)     not null     PK
fourteen     varchar2(5)     not null
fifteen     varchar2(5)     not null
sixteen     varchar2(2)     not null
seventeen     varchar2(35)     not null
eighteen     varchar2(4)     not null
nineteen     varchar2(2)
twenty     varchar2(1)
twentyone     number(6)
Table3:
one          varchar2(1)     not null     PK
twentytwo     varchar2(12)     not null     PK
two          varchar2(20)     not null     PK
three          number(5)     not null     PK
four          number(2)     not null     PK
twentysix     number(2)     not null     PK
twentyfive     varchar2(1)     not null
nine          date          not null
twentythree     number(13,8)     not null
twentyfour     number(12,8)     not null
twentyseven     varchar2(1)     not null
eight          varchar2(8)     not null
Explain - Oracle9i (default, with CBO):
SELECT STATEMENT
RECURSIVE EXECUTION SYS_LE_3_0
RECURSIVE EXECUTION SYS_LE_3_1
TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION
HASH JOIN
HASH JOIN
HASH JOIN
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_AB874A
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS
BITMAP AND
BITMAP MERGE
BITMAP KEY ITERATION
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_AB874A
BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
BITMAP MERGE
BITMAP KEY ITERATION
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6602_AB874A
BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX04
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6602_AB874A
TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE2
Query results - Oracle9i (with CBO):
X|A | 1| 0| 22| | 1|08-MAR-02|XYZ | | 24.00| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|B | 2| 1| 22| | 7|04-DEC-01|XYZ | | 3.25| 8.00| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|C | 3| 1| 22| | 1|14-AUG-02|XYZ | | 10.35| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|D | 4| 1| 22| | 6|11-JUL-02|XYZ | | .00| 13.90| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
(approximately 4550 rows returned)
Explain - Oracle9i (ALTER SESSION SET OPTIMIZER_METHOD=RULE;):
SELECT STATEMENT
MERGE JOIN
SORT JOIN
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
VIEW VW_NSO_1
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE3
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE3INDEXPK
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN TABLE2INDEXPK
SORT JOIN
VIEW VW_NSO_2
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
Explain - Oracle 7.3.4:
SELECT STATEMENT
MERGE JOIN
SORT JOIN
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
VIEW
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE3
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE3INDEX03
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN TABLE2INDEXPK
SORT JOIN
VIEW
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
Query results - Oracle 7.3.4:
X|A | 1| 0| 22| | 1|08-MAR-02|XYZ | | 24.00| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|B | 2| 1| 22| | 7|04-DEC-01|XYZ | | 3.25| 8.00| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|C | 3| 1| 22| | 1|14-AUG-02|XYZ | | 10.35| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|D | 4| 1| 22| | 6|11-JUL-02|XYZ | | .00| 13.90| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
(approximately 1150 rows returned)
Indexes (used):
TABLE1INDEX03     (three)
TABLE1INDEX04     (five)
TABLE2INDEXPK     (five)
TABLE3INDEXPK     (one,twentytwo,two,three,four,twentysix)
Discussion:
Notice the repeating result for X,E,5,5,23,.... in the Oracle9i retrieval using CBO.
The execution of this query returned approximately four times the number of rows as
Oracle 7.3.4 using RBO. This is a function of how many "fours" there are in table3
that have matching "threes and fours" in table1. If you put a DISTINCT clause at the
very front of the query (SELECT DISTINCT one,two,three ....) then the result is
accurate and the same as Oracle 7.3.4. In one execution of this query, 27,000 rows
are expected to be returned, but the server returned over 1 million rows!
When RBO was used on Oracle9i, the results were identical to the ones on Oracle 7.3.4.

ORA-00604 ORA-00904 When query partitioned table with partitioned indexes

Got ORA-00604 ORA-00904 When query partitioned table with partitioned indexes in the data warehouse environment.
Query runs fine when query the partitioned table without partitioned indexes.
Here is the query.
SELECT al2.vdc_name, al7.model_series_name, COUNT (DISTINCT (al1.vin)),
al27.accessory_code
FROM vlc.veh_vdc_accessorization_fact al1,
vlc.vdc_dim al2,
vlc.model_attribute_dim al7,
vlc.ppo_list_dim al18,
vlc.ppo_list_indiv_type_dim al23,
vlc.accy_type_dim al27
WHERE ( al2.vdc_id = al1.vdc_location_id
AND al7.model_attribute_id = al1.model_attribute_id
AND al18.mydppolist_id = al1.ppo_list_id
AND al23.mydppolist_id = al18.mydppolist_id
AND al23.mydaccytyp_id = al27.mydaccytyp_id
AND ( al7.model_series_name IN ('SCION TC', 'SCION XA', 'SCION XB')
AND al2.vdc_name IN
('PORT OF BALTIMORE',
'PORT OF JACKSONVILLE - LEXUS',
'PORT OF LONG BEACH',
'PORT OF NEWARK',
'PORT OF PORTLAND'
AND al27.accessory_code IN ('42', '43', '44', '45')
GROUP BY al2.vdc_name, al7.model_series_name, al27.accessory_code

I would recommend that you post this at the following OTN forum:
Database - General
General Database Discussions
and perhaps at:
Oracle Warehouse Builder
Warehouse Builder
The Oracle OLAP forum typically does not cover general data warehousing topics.

Query on Materials with deletion date

Dear All,
We need a query (SQ01/SQ02) with following result:
- Material with deletion flag
- Date of the deletion (when deletion flag was set)
and the following selection:
- Period of deletion
- Plant
I know that I can find the material with MARA (and MARA - LVORM for deleted material). How can I find the date when a material was deleted?
Thank you in advance for your inputs.
Best regards,
Thomas

Hi,
DF for material can be set at different levels not only at client level - so, not only table MARA may contain information on deletion (e.g. you can set DF at warehouse, SLoc level, etc.).
Table CDHDR contains information on changes of material master.
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jan 20, 2009 8:36 AM

ORA-20001:Error fetching column value:Query must begin with SELECT or WITH

Hi all,
I have implemented an application with a master-detail form using Apex 3.1.2 and I imported that to Apex 3.2 on different server. Everything else seems to be fine except when I add detail record (clicking on Add Rows), I am getting following error.
=================
report error:
ORA-20001: Error fetching column value: ORA-20001: Query must begin with SELECT or WITH
====================
Both the databases have same version 10gR2. I didn't make any change after importing it as well. Can someone let me know what could be the issue? Thanks in advance.
SHY

May we know your first name?
Can you put the application in your workspace on apex.oracle.com so we can take a look?
Scott

Query between different infoproviders

How to copy query between different infoproviders?

Hi,
It can be done throught he transaction RSZC
1)     Run the Code RSZC and Input the Source and Target infoprovider name.Execute it.
2)     Next screen you will get the option of which query to copy, select the query.
3)     Go to next screen and change the name of the query that is in the destination. (If you want).
4)     Next screen, Message is displayed if success or failure.
Important Note : This function allows you to copy queries and their subobjects
(structures, calculated key figures, and restricted key figures) between different InfoCubes. Note that the target InfoCube, that is the cube with the query copies, has to contain all the InfoObjects that are contained in the source InfoCube (InfoCube with the original queries)

CR on BW query: Crystal multiplies with 100

Hello Experts,
we´re having a major problem concerning the display of decimals in Crystal Reports that are build upon a SAP BW query.
The Query displays e.g. u20181195u2019. At first, Crystal also displays u20181195u2019. Then after having done some more implementation, the report suddenly displays u2018119500u2019, that means the figure is displayed as if it had been multiplied with 100 ! Strangely it´s not with all but some figures. Also it doesn´t happen with all reports, but with some (up to now there are two that use also two different queries).
Sure, we can 'format' the wrongly displayed figures by adding a formula that multiplies by 0.01, but that´s not the way it should be.
Has anyone else also had similar experiences with the displaying of decimals ?
Many thanks in advance for your help !
Frank

Duplicate of CR on BW query: Crystal multiplies with 100
Please do not post duplicate threads, many thanks

Query Group in Query Category different with Authorization's group number

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for