Query to a TS200v upgrade from celery to vroom-vroom

Hi every one, I am from London UK new to forum and I wish you many lenovo years to come.
I am new to lenovo products, and after many days and many review I decided to go with the TS200v, very exciting. My model is the one with the Intel G1101/2.26GHz/2MB L2 celeron chip. My query is just to reinforce the homework I have done. Does anyone know if I can upgrade the same motherboard to a 3.60GHz 2.5GT/s DMI 4MB Cache Intel Core i5-680 Processor with fuel injection without making the bios heated, hot, huffy, and possibly the pin number to my girlfriends bank card. Maybe one day I'll be able to return the favoure. Many thanks in advance and Kind Regard.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

welcome to the forum!
the i5-680 is on the list of supported CPUs (link) for the TS200v. with the i5-680 being only 73W, you shouldn't have any issues with cooling. the factory heatsink can take up to a 95W TDP processor.
one caveat: the new processor won't be covered under your factory warranty. the heatsink and system planar will remain covered as long as you don't damage them during the installation. so, please be careful when servicing your system.
if you want video instructions on the process, you can follow the M91/M91p guide here: http://www.lenovoservicetraining.com/ion/M91p_Tower/index.html
(there currently isn't a video for the TS200v so the M91 is the closest system available)
good luck!
ThinkStation C20
ThinkPad X1C · X220 · X60T · s30 · 600

Similar Messages

Asset query execution performance after upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0+EHP4

Hi,guys
I am encounted a weird problems about asset query execution performance after upgrade to ECC 6.0.
Our client had migrated sap system from 4.6c to ECC 6.0. We test all transaction code and related stand report and query.
Everything is working normally except this asset depreciation query report. It is created based on ANLP, ANLZ, ANLA, ANLB, ANLC table; there is also some ABAP code for additional field.
This report execution costed about 6 minutes in 4.6C system; however it will take 25 minutes in ECC 6.0 with same selection parameter.
At first, I am trying to find some difference in table index ,structure between 4.6c and ECC 6.0,but there is no difference about it.
i am wondering why the other query reports is running normally but only this report running with too long time execution dump messages even though we do not make any changes for it.
your reply is very appreciated
Regards
Brian

Thanks for your replies.
I check these notes, unfortunately it is different our situation.
Our situation is all standard asset report and query (sq01) is running normally except this query report.
I executed se30 for this query (SQ01) at both 4.6C and ECC 6.0.
I find there is some difference in select sequence logic even though same query without any changes.
I list there for your reference.
4.6C
AQA0FI==========S2============
Open Cursor ANLP                                    38,702 39,329,356 = 39,329,356      34.6     AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     Opens
Fetch ANLP                                         292,177 30,378,351 = 30,378,351      26.7    26.7 AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
Select Single ANLC                                  15,012 19,965,172 = 19,965,172      17.5    17.5 AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
Select Single ANLA                                  13,721 11,754,305 = 11,754,305      10.3    10.3 AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
Select Single ANLZ                                   3,753   3,259,308 = 3,259,308       2.9     2.9 AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
Select Single ANLB                                   3,753   3,069,119 = 3,069,119       2.7     2.7 AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
ECC 6.0
Perform FUNKTION_AUSFUEHREN     2     358,620,931          355
Perform COMMAND_QSUB     1     358,620,062          68
Call Func. RSAQ_SUBMIT_QUERY_REPORT     1     358,569,656          88
Program AQIWFI==========S2============     2     358,558,488          1,350
Select Single ANLA     160,306     75,576,052     =     75,576,052
Open Cursor ANLP     71,136     42,096,314     =     42,096,314
Select Single ANLC     71,134     38,799,393     =     38,799,393
Select Single ANLB     61,888     26,007,721     =     26,007,721
Select Single ANLZ     61,888     24,072,111     =     24,072,111
Fetch ANLP     234,524     13,510,646     =     13,510,646
Close Cursor ANLP     71,136     2,017,654     =     2,017,654
We can see first open cursor ANLP ,fetch ANLP then select ANLC,ANLA,ANLZ,ANLB at 4.C.
But it changed to first select ANLA,and open cursor ANLP,then select ANLC,ANLB,ANLZ,at last fetch ANLP.
Probably,it is the real reason why it is running long time in ECC 6.0.
Is there any changes for query selcection logic(table join function) in ECC 6.0.

SQL query is slow after upgrading from SQL 2008 to SQL 2008 R2

Hello
We were using SQL 2008 Standard, but after upgrading to R2, following query is much slower (takes 5 seconds instead of less than 1 second), how is this possible?
Regards, Hennie
SELECT
P.BSN,
P.Persnr,
P.Roepnaam,
P.Tussenvoegsels,
P.Achternaam,
P.Geslacht,
COALESCE (P.Achternaam + ', ' + P.Roepnaam + ' ' + P.Tussenvoegsels, P.Achternaam + ', ' + P.Roepnaam, P.Achternaam) AS naamvolledig,
P.Telmobiel,
P.Telvast,
P.Postcode,
G.groep,
COALESCE (RM.nieuweDag, GR.Dag) AS dag,
COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum) AS datum,
DATEPART(ww, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum)) AS weeknummer,
DATEPART(yyyy, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum)) AS jaar,
CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
  CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,
   CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END)
  ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd) END, 108) AS begintijdberekend,
CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
  CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd,
   CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END)
  ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd) END, 108) AS eindtijdberekend,
CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN
   CONVERT(NCHAR(5), COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END), 108) + '-' +
   CONVERT(NCHAR(5), COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END), 108)
  ELSE CONVERT(NCHAR(5),COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd), 108) + '-' + CONVERT(NCHAR(5), COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd), 108)
  END AS Tijdspanne,
CASE
  WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 AND R.id_relaties = 9 THEN 'Werk Intern'
  WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN R.relatienaam
  ELSE L.lokatie END AS Lokatieberekend,
R.relatienaam AS relatie,
L.IntExt,
RA.Omschrijving AS roosteractiviteit,
A.instroomdatum,
A.uitstroomdatum,
TT.trajecttype,
W.Naamvolledig AS Werkcoach,
A.ID_groepen,
T.ID_personen,
A.ID_werkcoaches,
CASE
  WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 AND R.id_relaties = 9 THEN 20
  WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN R.id_relaties
  ELSE L.ID_relaties END AS ID_lokatieberekend,
A.ID_relaties AS ID_relatie,
R.nummer2 AS capaciteit,
GR.ID_groepsroosters,
CAST(CASE WHEN foto IS NOT NULL THEN 'Ja' ELSE NULL END AS char(2)) AS Foto,
W.Email,
W.TelefoonMobiel,
W.TelefoonVast
FROM
dbo.personen AS P INNER JOIN
dbo.trajecten AS T ON T.ID_personen = P.ID_personen INNER JOIN
dbo.trajecttype AS TT ON T.ID_trajecttype = TT.ID_trajecttype INNER JOIN
dbo.trajectactiviteiten AS A ON A.ID_trajecten = T.ID_trajecten INNER JOIN
dbo.groepsroosters AS GR ON GR.ID_groepen = A.ID_groepen LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.roosteractiviteit AS RA ON GR.ID_roosteractiviteit = RA.ID_roosteractiviteit INNER JOIN
dbo.lokaties AS L ON GR.ID_lokaties = L.ID_lokaties INNER JOIN
dbo.werkcoaches AS W ON A.ID_werkcoaches = W.ID_werkcoaches INNER JOIN
dbo.groepen AS G ON A.ID_groepen = G.ID_groepen LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.relaties AS R ON A.ID_relaties = R.ID_relaties LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.roostermutaties AS RM ON P.ID_personen = RM.ID_personen AND GR.ID_groepsroosters = RM.ID_groepsroosters AND RM.aanwezig IS NULL
WHERE
(COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum) BETWEEN GETDATE() - 1 AND GETDATE() + 13)
AND (COALESCE (DATEDIFF(day, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum), A.uitstroomdatum), 0) >= 0)
AND (DATEDIFF(day, A.instroomdatum, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum)) >= 0)
AND ((SELECT COUNT(*) AS Expr1
  FROM dbo.roostermutaties AS RM2
  WHERE (P.ID_personen = ID_personen)
  AND (GR.ID_groepsroosters = ID_groepsroosters)
  AND (CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), begintijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
  CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,
  CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END)
  ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd) END, 108)) AND
  (CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), eindtijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd,
  CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END) ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd) END, 108))) = 0)

We were using SQL 2008 Standard, but after upgrading to R2, following query is much slower (takes 5 seconds instead of less than 1 second), how is this possible?
It is not uncommon to experience performance problems following an upgrade when there are issues with original query. Non-sargable expressions like Olaf called out are often the culprit, as well as lack of useful indexes and statistics.
The optimizer cannot glean accurate row count estimates or use indexes efficiently so the resultant plan may not be optimal for the task at hand. It is only by happenstance that old plan performed better; it could just as well be the other way around,
but again only by chance since the optimizer is guessing.
You might also try using EXISTS instead of SELECT COUNT(*)...= 0:
AND EXISTS(SELECT *
FROM dbo.roostermutaties AS RM2
WHERE P.ID_personen = ID_personen
AND GR.ID_groepsroosters = ID_groepsroosters
AND CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), begintijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,
CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END)
ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd) END, 108)
AND CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), eindtijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd,
CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END) ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd) END, 108))
Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

Query Performance problem after upgrade from 8i to 10g

Following query takes longer time in 10g.
SELECT LIC_ID,FSCL_YR,KEY_NME,CRTE_TME_STMP,REMT_AMT,UNASGN_AMT,BAD_CK_IND,CSH_RCPT_PARTY_ID,csh_rcpt_id,REC_TYP,XENT_ID,CLNT_CDE,BTCH_CSH_STA,file_nbr,
lic_nbr,TAX_NBR,ASGN_AMT FROM (
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS*/
cpty.lic_id,
cpty.clnt_cde,
cpty.csh_rcpt_party_id,
cpty.csh_rcpt_id,
cpty.rec_typ,
cpty.xent_id,
cr.fscl_yr,
cbh.btch_csh_sta,
nam.key_nme,
lic.file_nbr,
lic.lic_nbr,
cr.crte_tme_stmp,
cr.remt_amt,
cr.unasgn_amt,
ee.tax_nbr,
cr.asgn_amt,
cr.bad_ck_ind
FROM lic lic
,csh_rcpt_party cpty
,name nam
,xent ee
,csh_rcpt cr
,csh_btch_hdr cbh
WHERE 1 = 1
AND ee.xent_id = nam.xent_id
AND cbh.btch_id = cr.btch_id
AND cr.csh_rcpt_id = cpty.csh_rcpt_id
AND ee.xent_id = cpty.xent_id
AND cpty.lic_id = lic.lic_id(+)
AND (cpty.clnt_cde IN ( SELECT clnt_cde
FROM clnt
START WITH clnt_cde = '4006'
CONNECT BY PRIOR clnt_cde_prnt = clnt_cde)
OR cpty.clnt_cde IS NULL)
AND nam.cur_nme_ind = 'Y'
AND nam.ent_nme_typ = 'P' AND nam.key_nme LIKE 'WHITE%')
order by lic_id
Explain Plan in 8i
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=HINT: FIRST_ROWS (Cost=17 Card=1
Bytes=107)
1 0 FILTER
2 1 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=17 Card=1 Bytes=107)
3 2 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=15 Card=1 Bytes=101)
4 3 NESTED LOOPS (OUTER) (Cost=13 Card=1 Bytes=73)
5 4 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=11 Card=1 Bytes=60)
6 5 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=6 Card=1 Bytes=35)
7 6 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'NAME_WBSRCH1_I' (NON-UN
IQUE) (Cost=4 Card=1 Bytes=26)
8 6 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'XENT' (Cost=
2 Card=4649627 Bytes=41846643)
9 8 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'EE_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cos
t=1 Card=4649627)
10 5 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CSH_RCPT_PARTY
' (Cost=5 Card=442076 Bytes=11051900)
11 10 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'CPTY_EE_FK_I' (NON-UNIQ
UE) (Cost=2 Card=442076)
12 4 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'LIC' (Cost=2 Car
d=3254422 Bytes=42307486)
13 12 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'LIC_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1
Card=3254422)
14 3 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CSH_RCPT' (Cost=2
Card=6811443 Bytes=190720404)
15 14 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CR_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1 Ca
rd=6811443)
16 2 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CSH_BTCH_HDR' (Cost=
2 Card=454314 Bytes=2725884)
17 16 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CBH_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1 Car
d=454314)
18 1 FILTER
19 18 CONNECT BY
20 19 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CLNT_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1 Ca
rd=1 Bytes=4)
21 19 TABLE ACCESS (BY USER ROWID) OF 'CLNT'
22 19 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CLNT' (Cost=2 Card
=1 Bytes=7)
23 22 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CLNT_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1
Card=1)
Explain Plan in 10g
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=HINT: FIRST_ROWS (Cost=19 Card=1
Bytes=112)
1 0 SORT (ORDER BY) (Cost=19 Card=1 Bytes=112)
2 1 FILTER
3 2 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=18 Card=1 Bytes=112)
4 3 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=16 Card=1 Bytes=106)
5 4 NESTED LOOPS (OUTER) (Cost=14 Card=1 Bytes=78)
6 5 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=12 Card=1 Bytes=65)
7 6 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=6 Card=1 Bytes=34)
8 7 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'NAME_WBSRCH1_I' (INDE
X) (Cost=4 Card=1 Bytes=25)
9 7 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'XENT' (TAB
LE) (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=9)
10 9 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'EE_PK' (INDEX (UNI
QUE)) (Cost=1 Card=1)
11 6 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CSH_RCPT_PAR
TY' (TABLE) (Cost=6 Card=1 Bytes=31)
12 11 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'CPTY_EE_FK_I' (INDEX)
(Cost=2 Card=4)
13 5 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'LIC' (TABLE) (
Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=13)
14 13 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'LIC_PK' (INDEX (UNIQUE
)) (Cost=1 Card=1)
15 4 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CSH_RCPT' (TABLE
) (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=28)
16 15 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CR_PK' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
(Cost=1 Card=1)
17 3 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CSH_BTCH_HDR' (TAB
LE) (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=6)
18 17 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CBH_PK' (INDEX (UNIQUE)) (
Cost=1 Card=1)
19 2 FILTER
20 19 CONNECT BY (WITH FILTERING)
21 20 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CLNT' (TABLE) (C
ost=2 Card=1 Bytes=15)
22 21 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CLNT_PK' (INDEX (UNIQUE)
) (Cost=1 Card=1)
23 20 NESTED LOOPS
24 23 BUFFER (SORT)
25 24 CONNECT BY PUMP
26 23 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CLNT' (TABLE)
(Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=7)
27 26 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CLNT_PK' (INDEX (UNIQU
E)) (Cost=1 Card=1)
28 20 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'CLNT' (TABLE) (Cost=5 Card
=541 Bytes=5951)
Explain plan looks different in steps 19 to 28. I am not sure why 10g have more steps

Hi
I have no experience in 8i. I do know 10g does costing different from 8i. So I think the other plan might got elliminated.
Normally when I see differences. I just collect statistics on the tables and the indexes and remove the hints. Hints are not good . This has helped me to solve few problems.
Thanks
CT

Query Engine Error after upgrade from CR for VS2003 to CR for VS2008

Three CR reports were built in CR 8.5, loaded into VS2003 (C#), and converted. Each report worked fine for the past three years. Each report users the same odbc connection direct to the Sybase 12.5.3 database and each is based on a stored procedure. Each report has input parameters. Recently we did an upgrade to VS2008. We installed the CRRedist2008_x86.msi on the development machine running Windows XP and on the server running Windows 2003. No changes were made to the design of the reports, the parameters, or to the database stored procedures.
Several other reports run just fine since the update to VS2008, however, two reports are now raising an error message "Query Engine Error: 'An internal error has occurred. Please contact Business Objects technical support.' Failed to open a rowset." This error message occurs just after ReportViewer.ShowDialog() method is called (login has already been successfully achieved) I verified that with the parameters being passed to the reports are correct and that these should indeed be returning data.
One additional report is also now raising the error "Query Engine Error at CrystalDecisions.ReportAppServer.Controllers.ReportSourceClass.GetLastPageNumber(RequestContext pRequestContext) at CrystalDecisions.ReportSource.EromReportSourceBase.GetLastPageNumber(ReportPageRequestContext reqContext) ". It can be described as above, odbc connection to Sybase 12.5.3, achieves a successful login, based on a stored procedure that is unchanged. The rpt itself is unchanged.
I would appreciate your assistance with getting these reports working again. Any suggestions welcome!

I forgot to mention that I had already done a 'Verify Database' on each of these reports, with no success. However, I have now repeated the 'Verify Database' on each report and they all work. Not sure why it had to be done a second time, but I am very happy that it works. Thank you for your response.
In answer to your question - why does the Crystal Reports runtime have to be installed on the development machine? This is because our process includes an installation of the application on the development machine, independent of the debug environment, and a test of that application instance before deploying to the application server.

Query engine error after upgrading from vs2003 to 2008

Hi,
I had crystal reports installed and working with visual studio 2003 using .Net. After upgrading to visual C# 2008 Express, When I attempt to create a report at runtime, I get the error "Query Engine Error. <filelocation>\report1.rpt"
If I attempt to edit a report at design time, I get the following error: "There is no editor available for <fileLocation>\report1.rpt. Make sure the application for the file type (.rpt) is installed.
Can anyone point me in the right direction??
Thanks,
Dittimon

Crystal Reports is not supported with the Express editions of Visual Studio.
If you are going to use VS.NET 2008 you will need to use the Professional Version or higher.
This is noted in the following help file: [CR 2008|http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/boexir31/en/crsdk_net_dg_12_en.chm ]
Under Supported Versions of Visual Studio
Jason

Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

Hi All,
There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
Select query is on the table COSP.
SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
        FROM COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
        WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
          AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
          AND LEDNR EQ '00'
          AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
          AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
          AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
          AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
          AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
        GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
   LOOP AT I_COSP      .
     COSP                           = I_COSP      .
     PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
     CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
     CLEAR CCR1S                         .
   ENDLOOP.
ENDSELECT.
I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
Thanks in advance for the responses.
Regards,
Dedeepya.

Hi,
ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
Some generic comments:
1. never use SELECT
                   endselect.
   SELECT
into table
   for all entries in table
where.
   use perform statment after this selection.
2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
    e.g in your case
          sequence should be
LEDNR
OBJNR
GJAHR
WRTTP
VERSN
KSTAR
HRKFT
VRGNG
VBUND
PARGB
BEKNZ
TWAER
PERBL
sequence should be same as defined in table.
Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Pranaya

ABAP Query in Upgradation from 4.7 to ECC6.0

Hi there,
We are upgrading SAP system from 4.7 to ECC6.0. We have s/w component SAP_BASIS = 700.
It would be of great help if anybody share their thought on handling ABAP queries after upgradation from 4.7 to ECC6.0.
We have refered SAP notes 132813 and 672784 where in we need to change the default query area.
Also, do we need to re-genarate the queries? If yes then how can we achive the same.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
It may happen that some times, the queries are not generated after the upgrade.
Hence call the FM: RSAQ_GENERATE_PROGRAM
Pass the Query name and user group.
For all global queries: refer table AQGQCAT and local/client specific queries: Refer to AQLQCAT.
This can help to regenerate the queries.
You can also write a small program to generate using the above FM(one time program) that runs after upgrade
Hope this helps
Regards
Shiva

ABAP Query Miising after ECC6.0 Upgrade from 4.7

Hi
We are upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0. After upgrading, we found that ABAP queries that were there in 4.7 are missing. It gives an error that AQZZ####... Program not found.
What could be the problem, is there something we left out while upgrading?
Regards
Ramya

so you say, the tcode directly calls a program? The generated program name might be different between releases.
A tcode for query has to look like:
Create a transaction calling transaction START_REPORT with the following parameters/attributes filled :
D_SREPOVARI-REPORTTYPE= AQ "parameter indicating Abap Query
D_SREPOVARI-REPORT= ' ' "Query User group
D_SREPOVARI-EXTDREPORT= ' ' "Query name
Did you check the standard / global areas in SQ01?
Message was edited by:
Eric Cartman

Fields in read-only mode for BP transaction in upgrade from 4.72 to ECC6.0

Hello,
This is regarding the query for BP transaction in upgrade from 4.72 to ECC 6.0.
While creating BP / Changing BP system is disabling the fields in compnay code & sales area option. There is a SAP not provided 907860; and specified that the proplem is because of the delta customizing.
All the customization settings are as per the note. And the Synchronization Control is also activated. But still the fields are disabled only.
I have checked the field settings also in Cross-Application-Components & Logistic-Genral.
But these are not working for compnay code & sales area data.
please let me know if anyone has faced this type of problem / found any solution on this.
Best Regards,
Shubhada

SAP IMG -> Cross Application Components -> Master Data Synchronization  Synchronization Control -> Synchronization Control -> Activate Synchronization options
This setting allows you to activate synchronization of BP with R/3. Not maintaining the values may result in certain fields being read-only in BP.
Suggested Values:
Source Object: BP | Target Object: CUSTOMER | Active Indicator : X
Source Object: BP | Target Object: VENDOR | Active Indicator : X
Source Object: CUSTOMER | Target Object: BP | Active Indicator : X
Source Object: VENDOR | Target Object: BP | Active Indicator : X
Have you set all of the above settings??
BHARATH

Slow table creation after upgrade from 10.2.0.3 to 11.2.0.1 using DBUA

I've recently completed a database upgrade from 10.2.0.3 to 11.2.0.1 using the DBUA.
I've since encountered a slowdown when running a script which drops and recreates a series of ~250 tables. The script normally runs in around 19 seconds. After the upgrade, the script requires ~2 minutes to run.
By chance has anyone encountered something similar?
The problem may be related to the behavior of an "after CREATE on schema" trigger which grants select privileges to a role through the use of a dbms_job call; between 10g and the database that was upgraded from 10G to 11g. Currently researching this angle.
I will be using the following table creation DDL for this abbreviated test case:
create table ALLIANCE (
   ALLIANCEID           NUMBER(10)                      not null,
   NAME                 VARCHAR2(40)                    not null,
   CREATION_DATE        DATE,
   constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
           using index
       tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA;When calling the above DDL, an "after CREATE on schema" trigger is fired which schedules a job to immediately run to grant select privilege to a role for the table which was just created:
create or replace
trigger select_grant
after CREATE on schema
declare
    l_str varchar2(255);
    l_job number;
begin
    if ( ora_dict_obj_type = 'TABLE' ) then
        l_str := 'execute immediate "grant select on ' ||
                                     ora_dict_obj_name ||
                                    ' to select_role";';
        dbms_job.submit( l_job, replace(l_str,'"','''') );
    end if;
end;
{code}
Below I've included data on two separate test runs. The first is on the upgraded database and includes optimizer parameters and an abbreviated TKPROF. I've also, included the offending sys generate SQL which is not issued when the same test is run on a 10g environment that has been set up with a similar test case. The 10g test run's TKPROF is also included below.
The version of the database is 11.2.0.1.
These are the parameters relevant to the optimizer for the test run on the upgraded 11g SID:
{code}
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_capture_sql_plan_baselines boolean     FALSE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      11.2.0.1
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
optimizer_use_invisible_indexes      boolean     FALSE
optimizer_use_pending_statistics     boolean     FALSE
optimizer_use_sql_plan_baselines     boolean     TRUE
SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     8
SQL> show parameter db_block_size
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_block_size                        integer     8192
SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACT
SQL> column sname format a20
SQL> column pname format a20
SQL> column pval2 format a20
SQL> select sname, pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$;
SNAME                PNAME                     PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO        STATUS                          COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTART                          03-11-2010 16:33
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTOP                           03-11-2010 17:03
SYSSTATS_INFO        FLAGS                         0
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEEDNW           713.978495
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOSEEKTIM                    10
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOTFRSPEED                 4096
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SREADTIM               1565.746
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEED                   2310
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MBRC
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MAXTHR
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SLAVETHR
13 rows selected.
{code}
Output from TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
create table ALLIANCE (
   ALLIANCEID           NUMBER(10)                      not null,
   NAME                 VARCHAR2(40)                    not null,
   CREATION_DATE        DATE,
   constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
           using index
       tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 324
{code}
... large section omitted ...
Here is the performance hit portion of the TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
SQL ID: fsbqktj5vw6n9
Plan Hash: 1443566277
select next_run_date, obj#, run_job, sch_job
from
(select decode(bitand(a.flags, 16384), 0, a.next_run_date,
a.last_enabled_time) next_run_date,       a.obj# obj#,
decode(bitand(a.flags, 16384), 0, 0, 1) run_job, a.sch_job sch_job from
(select p.obj# obj#, p.flags flags, p.next_run_date next_run_date,
p.job_status job_status, p.class_oid class_oid,      p.last_enabled_time
last_enabled_time, p.instance_id instance_id,      1 sch_job   from
sys.scheduler$_job p   where bitand(p.job_status, 3) = 1    and
((bitand(p.flags, 134217728 + 268435456) = 0) or
(bitand(p.job_status, 1024) <> 0))    and bitand(p.flags, 4096) = 0    and
p.instance_id is NULL    and (p.class_oid is null      or (p.class_oid is
not null      and p.class_oid in (select b.obj# from sys.scheduler$_class b
                           where b.affinity is null)))   UNION ALL   select
q.obj#, q.flags, q.next_run_date, q.job_status, q.class_oid,
q.last_enabled_time, q.instance_id, 1   from sys.scheduler$_lightweight_job
q   where bitand(q.job_status, 3) = 1    and ((bitand(q.flags, 134217728 +
268435456) = 0) or         (bitand(q.job_status, 1024) <> 0))    and
bitand(q.flags, 4096) = 0    and q.instance_id is NULL    and (q.class_oid
is null      or (q.class_oid is not null      and q.class_oid in (select
c.obj# from sys.scheduler$_class c                          where
c.affinity is null)))   UNION ALL   select j.job, 0,
from_tz(cast(j.next_date as timestamp),      to_char(systimestamp,'TZH:TZM')
), 1, NULL,      from_tz(cast(j.next_date as timestamp),
to_char(systimestamp,'TZH:TZM')),     NULL, 0   from sys.job$ j   where
(j.field1 is null or j.field1 = 0)    and j.this_date is null) a   order by
1)   where rownum = 1
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1      0.47       0.47          0       9384          0           1
total        3      0.48       0.48          0       9384          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: SYS   (recursive depth: 1)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 COUNT STOPKEY (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      1   VIEW (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5344 size=6615380 card=194570)
      1    SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5344 size=11479630 card=194570)
194790     VIEW (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=537269 us cost=2563 size=11479630 card=194570)
194790      UNION-ALL (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=439235 us)
    231       FILTER (cr=68 pr=0 pw=0 time=920 us)
    231        TABLE ACCESS FULL SCHEDULER$_JOB (cr=66 pr=0 pw=0 time=690 us cost=19 size=13157 card=223)
      1        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SCHEDULER$_CLASS (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=1 size=40 card=1)
      1         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SCHEDULER$_CLASS_PK (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 5056)
      0       FILTER (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      0        TABLE ACCESS FULL SCHEDULER$_LIGHTWEIGHT_JOB (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=2 size=95 card=1)
      0        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SCHEDULER$_CLASS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=1 size=40 card=1)
      0         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SCHEDULER$_CLASS_PK (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 5056)
194559       TABLE ACCESS FULL JOB$ (cr=9313 pr=0 pw=0 time=167294 us cost=2542 size=2529254 card=194558)
{code}
and the totals at the end of the TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      2      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        3      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse       70      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute     85      0.01       0.01          0         62        208          37
Fetch       49      0.48       0.49          0       9490          0          35
total      204      0.51       0.51          0       9552        208          72
Misses in library cache during parse: 5
Misses in library cache during execute: 3
   35 user SQL statements in session.
   53 internal SQL statements in session.
   88 SQL statements in session.
Trace file: 11gSID_ora_17721.trc
Trace file compatibility: 11.1.0.7
Sort options: default
       1 session in tracefile.
      35 user SQL statements in trace file.
      53 internal SQL statements in trace file.
      88 SQL statements in trace file.
      51 unique SQL statements in trace file.
    1590 lines in trace file.
      18 elapsed seconds in trace file.
{code}
The version of the database is 10.2.0.3.0.
These are the parameters relevant to the optimizer for the test run on the 10g SID:
{code}
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.3
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     8
SQL> show parameter db_block_size
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_block_size                        integer     8192
SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACT
SQL> column sname format a20
SQL> column pname format a20
SQL> column pval2 format a20
SQL> select sname, pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$;
SNAME                PNAME                     PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO        STATUS                          COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTART                          09-24-2007 11:09
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTOP                           09-24-2007 11:09
SYSSTATS_INFO        FLAGS                         1
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEEDNW           2110.16949
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOSEEKTIM                    10
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOTFRSPEED                 4096
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEED
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MBRC
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MAXTHR
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SLAVETHR
13 rows selected.
{code}
Now for the TKPROF of a mirrored test environment running on a 10G SID:
{code}
create table ALLIANCE (
   ALLIANCEID           NUMBER(10)                      not null,
   NAME                 VARCHAR2(40)                    not null,
   CREATION_DATE        DATE,
   constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
           using index
       tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.01          0          2         16           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.01       0.01          0          2         16           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 113
{code}
... large section omitted ...
Totals for the TKPROF on the 10g SID:
{code}
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.02          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          2         16           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.00       0.02          0          2         16           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse       65      0.01       0.01          0          1         32           0
Execute     84      0.04       0.09         20         90        272          35
Fetch       88      0.00       0.10         30        281          0          64
total      237      0.07       0.21         50        372        304          99
Misses in library cache during parse: 38
Misses in library cache during execute: 32
   10 user SQL statements in session.
   76 internal SQL statements in session.
   86 SQL statements in session.
Trace file: 10gSID_ora_32003.trc
Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
Sort options: default
       1 session in tracefile.
      10 user SQL statements in trace file.
      76 internal SQL statements in trace file.
      86 SQL statements in trace file.
      43 unique SQL statements in trace file.
     949 lines in trace file.
       0 elapsed seconds in trace file.
{code}
Edited by: user8598842 on Mar 11, 2010 5:08 PM

So while this certainly isn't the most elegant of solutions, and most assuredly isn't in the realm of supported by Oracle...
I've used the DBMS_IJOB.DROP_USER_JOBS('username'); package to remove the 194558 orphaned job entries from the job$ table. Don't ask, I've no clue how they all got there; but I've prepared some evil looks to unleash upon certain developers tomorrow morning.
Not being able to reorganize the JOB$ table to free the now wasted ~67MB of space I've opted to create a new index on the JOB$ table to sidestep the full table scan.
CREATE INDEX SYS.JOB_F1_THIS_NEXT ON SYS.JOB$ (FIELD1, THIS_DATE, NEXT_DATE) TABLESPACE SYSTEM;The next option would be to try to find a way to grant the select privilege to the role without using the aforementioned "after CREATE on schema" trigger and dbms_job call. This method was adopted to cover situations in which a developer manually added a table directly to the database rather than using the provided scripts to recreate their test environment.
I assume that the following quote from the 11gR2 documentation is mistaken, and there is no such beast as "create or replace table" in 11g:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10592/statements_9003.htm#i2061306
"Dropping a table invalidates dependent objects and removes object privileges on the table. If you want to re-create the table, then you must regrant object privileges on the table, re-create the indexes, integrity constraints, and triggers for the table, and respecify its storage parameters. Truncating and replacing have none of these effects. Therefore, removing rows with the TRUNCATE statement or replacing the table with a *CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE* statement can be more efficient than dropping and re-creating a table."

Access is Denied -- Site Upgrade Upgrade from Foundation 2010 to Foundation 2013

I'm trying to do a Site Upgrade from Foundation 2010 to 2013 and I keep getting Access Denied during the site upgrade process
This is the error I keep seeing:
Inner Exception: Access is denied. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070005 (E_ACCESSDENIED))
Here is the log file.
"02/28/2014 10:23:02.36 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebWssSequence ajyxw DEBUG [Navision] NeedsUpgrade = true, SchemaVersion = 4.0.25.0, TargetSchemaVersion = 15.0.30.0. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.36 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxmv DEBUG NeedsUpgrade [Navision] true because of upgrader [Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPWebWssSequence] 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.36 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxmx DEBUG NeedsUpgrade [Navision] returned: True. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.36 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxn3 DEBUG Disposing Navision. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.36 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxni DEBUG Upgrading [Navision]. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.36 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebWssSequence ajywv DEBUG Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.36 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebWssSequence2 ajy8z DEBUG Begin upgrade of SPWeb scoped features. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPXmlConfiguration ajy1p DEBUG Template upgrade: Skipped upgrade WebTemplate XML for template 'STS#0' at: 'C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft
Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\CONFIG\Upgrade\WssUpgrade.xml'. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPXmlConfiguration ajy1t DEBUG Template upgrade:   Upgrade XML: <WebTemplate ID="1" LocaleId="*" FromProductVersion="4"
BeginFromSchemaVersion="0" EndFromSchemaVersion="2" ToSchemaVersion="3" /> 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPXmlConfiguration ajy1q DEBUG Template upgrade:   FromProductVersion '4' does not match current database version '3' for template 'STS#0'. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPXmlConfiguration ajy1p DEBUG Template upgrade: Skipped upgrade WebTemplate XML for template 'STS#0' at: 'C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft
Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\CONFIG\Upgrade\WssUpgradeB2B.xml'. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPXmlConfiguration ajy1t DEBUG Template upgrade:   Upgrade XML: <WebTemplate ID="1" LocaleId="*" FromProductVersion="4"
BeginFromSchemaVersion="0" EndFromSchemaVersion="2" ToSchemaVersion="3" /> 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPXmlConfiguration ajy1q DEBUG Template upgrade:   FromProductVersion '4' does not match current database version '3' for template 'STS#0'. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebTemplateSequenceForWeb ajy7f INFO Template STS#0: Web template upgrade for web/site [I deleted URL]6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebTemplateSequenceForWeb ajyw2 DEBUG SPRequest Objects=0 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebTemplateSequenceForWeb ajyw2 DEBUG SQL Query Count=0 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebTemplateSequenceForWeb ajyw2 DEBUG Execution Time=0.438254023905273 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebWssSequence ajyxl INFO [Navision] IsBackwardsCompatible = False, CurrentVersion = 4.0.25.0, BackwardsCompatibleSchemaVersion = 15.0.30.0, TargetSchemaVersion
= 15.0.30.0. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxn1 DEBUG UPGRADE PROGRESS: current object = [Navision], current sequence = [SPWebWssSequence], action 1 out of total 14 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxn2 DEBUG UPGRADE PERCENTAGE: 5.21488095% done, Total Elapsed Time 00:00:08.8762641. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajywc DEBUG Begin Initialize() 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajywd DEBUG End Initialize() 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajywe INFO Provision new master pages for O15 onto all webs and perform Visual Upgrade. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.37 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajywf DEBUG Begin Upgrade() 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:02.42 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajyqo INFO Modifying UIVersion field choices on the master page gallery in site: navision Site Url: [I
deleted URL]6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:03.65 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajyqp INFO Provisioning seattle master page in site: navision Site Url: [I deleted URL]6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:04.15 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUtility ajy0k INFO Master page 'seattle.master' already exists in the master page gallery, so there is no need to provision it. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:04.15 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajyqq INFO Updating masterpage in site: navision Site Url: [I deleted URL]6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebWssSequence ajywk ERROR Action 15.0.3.0 of Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPWebWssSequence failed. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebWssSequence ajywk ERROR Exception: Access is denied. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070005 (E_ACCESSDENIED)) 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebWssSequence ajywk ERROR    at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleUnauthorizedAccessException(UnauthorizedAccessException ex)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.OpenWeb(String bstrUrl, String& pbstrServerRelativeUrl, String& pbstrTitle, String& pbstrDescription, String& pbstrTitleResourceId, String& pbstrDescriptionResourceId, Guid& pguidID, DateTime&
pdtTimeCreated, String& pbstrRequestAccessEmail, UInt32& pwebVersion, Guid& pguidScopeId, UInt32& pnAuthorID, UInt32& pnLanguage, UInt32& pnLocale, UInt16& pnTimeZone, Boolean& bTime24, Int16& pnCollation, UInt32& pnCollationLCID,
Int16& pnCalendarType, Int16& pnAdjustHijriDays, Int16& pnAltCalendarType, Boolean& pbShowWeeks, Int16& pnFirstWeekOfYear, UInt32& pnFirstDayOfWeek, Int16& pnWorkDays, Int16& pnWorkDayStartHour, Int16& pnWorkDayEndHour,
Int16& pnMeetingCount, Int32& plFlags, Boolean& bConnectedToPortal, String& pbstrPortalUrl, String& pbstrPortalName, Int32& plWebTemplateId, Int16& pnProvisionConfig, String& pbstrDefaultTheme, String& pbstrDefaultThemeCSSUrl,
String& pbstrThemedCssFolderUrl, String& pbstrAlternateCSSUrl, String& pbstrCustomizedCssFileList, String& pbstrCustomJSUrl, String& pbstrAlternateHeaderUrl, String& pbstrMasterUrl, String& pbstrCustomMasterUrl, String& pbstrSiteLogoUrl,
String& pbstrSiteLogoDescription, Object& pvarUser, Boolean& pvarIsAuditor, UInt64& ppermMask, Boolean& bUserIsSiteAdmin, Boolean& bHasUniquePerm, Guid& pguidUserInfoListID, Guid& pguidUniqueNavParent, Int32& plSiteFlags,
DateTime& pdtLastContentChange, DateTime& pdtLastSecurityChange, String& pbstrWelcomePage, Boolean& pbOverwriteMUICultures, Boolean& pbMUIEnabled, String& pbstrAlternateMUICultures, Int32& plSiteSchemaMajorVersion, Int32& plSiteSchemaMinorVersion,
Int32& plSiteSchemaBuildVersion, Int32& plSiteSchemaRevisionVersion, Int32& puiVersion, Int16& pnClientTag, Boolean& pfIsEvalSite, Guid& pgSourceSiteId, DateTime& pdtExpirationDate, Guid& pgEvalSiteId, Guid& pguidAppProductId,
String& pbstrRemoteAppUrl, String& pbstrOAuthAppId, String& pbstrAppDatabaseName, Guid& pgAppDatabaseServerReferenceId, String& pbstrAppDatabaseTargetApplicationId, String& pbstrAppWebDomainId, Int32& plUpgradeFlags, DateTime&
pdtReminderDate, UInt64& pmaskDeny)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.InitWeb()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.get_Title()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSite.OpenWeb(Guid gWebId, Int32 mondoHint)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.<ClearMasterCssCaches>b__0()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated
secureCode)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated secureCode)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.Update()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.VisualUpgradeAction15.Upgrade()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPActionSequence.Upgrade() 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajywl DEBUG Begin Rollback() 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajywm DEBUG End Rollback() 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajywp DEBUG Begin Dispose() 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajywq DEBUG End Dispose() 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajywr DEBUG SPRequest Objects=6 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajywr DEBUG SQL Query Count=17 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade VisualUpgradeAction15 (15.0.3.0) ajywr DEBUG Execution Time=4867.40689109929 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxnk ERROR Upgrade [Navision] failed. Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPWebWssSequence has the ContinueOnFailiure bit set. Moving
on to the next object in sequence. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxnk ERROR Inner Exception: Access is denied. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070005 (E_ACCESSDENIED)) 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxnk ERROR    at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleUnauthorizedAccessException(UnauthorizedAccessException ex)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.OpenWeb(String bstrUrl, String& pbstrServerRelativeUrl, String& pbstrTitle, String& pbstrDescription, String& pbstrTitleResourceId, String& pbstrDescriptionResourceId, Guid& pguidID, DateTime&
pdtTimeCreated, String& pbstrRequestAccessEmail, UInt32& pwebVersion, Guid& pguidScopeId, UInt32& pnAuthorID, UInt32& pnLanguage, UInt32& pnLocale, UInt16& pnTimeZone, Boolean& bTime24, Int16& pnCollation, UInt32& pnCollationLCID,
Int16& pnCalendarType, Int16& pnAdjustHijriDays, Int16& pnAltCalendarType, Boolean& pbShowWeeks, Int16& pnFirstWeekOfYear, UInt32& pnFirstDayOfWeek, Int16& pnWorkDays, Int16& pnWorkDayStartHour, Int16& pnWorkDayEndHour,
Int16& pnMeetingCount, Int32& plFlags, Boolean& bConnectedToPortal, String& pbstrPortalUrl, String& pbstrPortalName, Int32& plWebTemplateId, Int16& pnProvisionConfig, String& pbstrDefaultTheme, String& pbstrDefaultThemeCSSUrl,
String& pbstrThemedCssFolderUrl, String& pbstrAlternateCSSUrl, String& pbstrCustomizedCssFileList, String& pbstrCustomJSUrl, String& pbstrAlternateHeaderUrl, String& pbstrMasterUrl, String& pbstrCustomMasterUrl, String& pbstrSiteLogoUrl,
String& pbstrSiteLogoDescription, Object& pvarUser, Boolean& pvarIsAuditor, UInt64& ppermMask, Boolean& bUserIsSiteAdmin, Boolean& bHasUniquePerm, Guid& pguidUserInfoListID, Guid& pguidUniqueNavParent, Int32& plSiteFlags,
DateTime& pdtLastContentChange, DateTime& pdtLastSecurityChange, String& pbstrWelcomePage, Boolean& pbOverwriteMUICultures, Boolean& pbMUIEnabled, String& pbstrAlternateMUICultures, Int32& plSiteSchemaMajorVersion, Int32& plSiteSchemaMinorVersion,
Int32& plSiteSchemaBuildVersion, Int32& plSiteSchemaRevisionVersion, Int32& puiVersion, Int16& pnClientTag, Boolean& pfIsEvalSite, Guid& pgSourceSiteId, DateTime& pdtExpirationDate, Guid& pgEvalSiteId, Guid& pguidAppProductId,
String& pbstrRemoteAppUrl, String& pbstrOAuthAppId, String& pbstrAppDatabaseName, Guid& pgAppDatabaseServerReferenceId, String& pbstrAppDatabaseTargetApplicationId, String& pbstrAppWebDomainId, Int32& plUpgradeFlags, DateTime&
pdtReminderDate, UInt64& pmaskDeny)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.InitWeb()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.get_Title()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSite.OpenWeb(Guid gWebId, Int32 mondoHint)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.<ClearMasterCssCaches>b__0()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated
secureCode)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated secureCode)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.Update()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.VisualUpgradeAction15.Upgrade()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPActionSequence.Upgrade() 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxnk ERROR Exception: Action 15.0.3.0 of Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPWebWssSequence failed. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxnk ERROR    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPActionSequence.Upgrade()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeSession.Upgrade(Object
o, Boolean bRecurse) 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxnn DEBUG Elapsed time upgrading [Navision]: 00:00:04. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxn6 DEBUG Disposing Navision. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxp7 DEBUG Found subweb template STS#0 (lcid: 1033) for ContentDatabase WSS_Content. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxmf DEBUG CanUpgrade [Customer Service Team] returned: True. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxnh DEBUG Customer Service Team IsGrown=False IsRoot=False IsLeaf=True. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUpgradeSiteSession ajxmf DEBUG CanUpgrade [Customer Service Team] returned: True. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebTemplateSequenceForWeb ajy68 DEBUG Loading onet.xml at C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\Template\SiteTemplates\STS\xml\onet.xml 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPWebTemplateSequenceForWeb ajy7b DEBUG Template STS#0: Calculated a target template version of '15.0.0.3' with target compatibility level of '15'
for the 'STS#0' template. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPXmlConfiguration ajy1p DEBUG Template upgrade: Skipped upgrade WebTemplate XML for template 'STS#0' at: 'C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft
Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\CONFIG\Upgrade\WssUpgrade.xml'. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPXmlConfiguration ajy1t DEBUG Template upgrade:   Upgrade XML: <WebTemplate ID="1" LocaleId="*" FromProductVersion="4"
BeginFromSchemaVersion="0" EndFromSchemaVersion="2" ToSchemaVersion="3" /> 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPXmlConfiguration ajy1q DEBUG Template upgrade:   FromProductVersion '4' does not match current database version '3' for template 'STS#0'. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPXmlConfiguration ajy1p DEBUG Template upgrade: Skipped upgrade WebTemplate XML for template 'STS#0' at: 'C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft
Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\CONFIG\Upgrade\WssUpgradeB2B.xml'. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPXmlConfiguration ajy1t DEBUG Template upgrade:   Upgrade XML: <WebTemplate ID="1" LocaleId="*" FromProductVersion="4"
BeginFromSchemaVersion="0" EndFromSchemaVersion="2" ToSchemaVersion="3" /> 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9
02/28/2014 10:23:07.24 OWSTIMER (0x0678) 0x0A50 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPXmlConfiguration ajy1q DEBUG Template upgrade:   FromProductVersion '4' does not match current database version '3' for template 'STS#0'. 42b4789c-6c14-203b-54a5-6052f9bdc7c9"

do you have the any no access / locked sites in that database and also any site which exceed its quota.
Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog

Search Service Application problems after upgrading from Foundation to Enterprise edition of SharePoint 2013

Hi all. I have been searching for days for a solution to a problem I am having with SP2013 Enterprise edition.
We recently upgraded from SP2013 Foundation to SP2013 Enterprise. After the upgrade, the search services are no longer working and we are receiving many application log entries indicating the following:
Application Server Administration job failed for service instance Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.SearchServiceInstance (ea2019ef-bb9e-4efe-85ee-5d2307406f31).
Reason: Access is denied. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070005 (E_ACCESSDENIED))
Technical Support Details:
System.UnauthorizedAccessException: Access is denied. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070005 (E_ACCESSDENIED))
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.SearchServiceInstance.Synchronize()
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.ApplicationServerJob.ProvisionLocalSharedServiceInstances(Boolean isAdministrationServiceJob)
as well as:
Application Server Administration job failed for service instance Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.SearchServiceInstance (ea2019ef-bb9e-4efe-85ee-5d2307406f31).
Reason: The object you are trying to create already exists. Try again using a different name.
Technical Support Details:
System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException (0x80040D02): The object you are trying to create already exists. Try again using a different name.
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.SearchServiceInstance.Synchronize()
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.ApplicationServerJob.ProvisionLocalSharedServiceInstances(Boolean isAdministrationServiceJob)
I have tried to remove the search service application and recreate it, and even though the SharePoint Central Administration states that it was created successfully, I am still getting the same errors in the log. If I go to the Search Service Application
Search Administration page, the "System Status" shows the following message:
The search service is not able to connect to the machine that hosts the administration component. Verify that the administration component '0359af35-0982-4ede-8838-b1d390e915bf' in search application 'Search Service Application' is in a good state and
try again
Additionally, under the "Search Application Topology" section, it states "Unable to retrieve topology component health states. This may be because the admin component is not up and running" which I assume is normal if the admin is not
running.
Does anyone know how I can resolve this problem?
Thanks!

Hi Joaquin,
According to your description, the error occurred when you re-created the Search Service Application.
Based on the error message, I recommend to verify the things below:
   1. Check if the association between the Search Service Application proxy and the web application is configured.
Please go to Central Administration > Application Management > Configured service application associations > Click Default to see if the Search Service application is checked.
   2. Change the app pool for the Search Service Application to SharePoint Web Services Default in the properties of the Search Service Application.
Please go to Central Administration > Application Management > Manage service applications > Highlight the Search Service Application > Click Properties in the ribbon > Change
the two app pool to SharePoint Web Services Default: App Pool For Search Admin Web Service and Application Pool for Search Query and Site Settings Web Service.
    3. Run PS command to check if the search admin timer job is enabled: Get-SPTimerJob
job-application-server-admin-service | fl. If it is not enabled, use PS command to enabled it and then reset Internet Information Services: Enable-SPTimerJob job-application-server-admin-service.
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Business Folder Upgrade from 11i to R12

Hi,
We are upgrading from 11.5.10.2 to R12.
In the process, we have to upgrade discoverer folder also.
To undergo the change, we are testing one report from 11i to R12.
The report has the business folder as po_vendors in 11i, which is taking data from PO_VENDORS table from PO schema.
As the PO_VENDORS table is obselete in R12.
We are trying to change the PO_VENDORS table to AP_SUPPLIERS table and we are changing schema from PO to AP.
We were able to do that in Disco Admin, but when I run the report from Desktop, we are not able to get the data.
Where in SQLInspector we can that the query is changed, one more interesting thing is when we run the query from backend for exact set of parameters, its returning data.
Is there anything which we need to take care, are we doing anything wrong.
Please help.
Thanks,
S

Hi,
We are using 3 views and a materialized view.
Object names are
1) AP_INVOICES
2) AP_INVOICES_DISTRIBUTIONS
3) AP_SUPPLIERS
now when we change the views to base tables for e.g. AP_INVOICES to AP_INVOICES_ALL and AP_INVOICES_DISTRIBUTIONS to AP_INVOICES_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL then our report is givng data.
PFB the query.
SELECT DISTINCT o215482.SEGMENT2 as E215623,o215482.SEGMENT2_DESCRIPTION as E215625,o215476.ATTRIBUTE5 as E216133,o215482.SEGMENT4 as E216142,o215482.SEGMENT1 as E216190,o215482.SEGMENT3 as E216208,o215482.SEGMENT3_DESCRIPTION as E216210,o215476.INVOICE_DATE as E216817,o215476.PAYMENT_STATUS_FLAG as E217125,o215473.PERIOD_NAME as E217133,o215487.VENDOR_NAME as E217379,o215487.SEGMENT1 as E217385,(SUBSTR(o215476.INVOICE_NUM,1,12)) as E217632,as215592_217133_OLD as as215592_217133_OLD,o215473.AMOUNT as E215705,NVL(o215476.INVOICE_AMOUNT,0) as E216800
FROM APPS.AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS o215473,
APPS.AP_INVOICES o215476,
APPS.JS_GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_MV o215482,
AP.AP_SUPPLIERS o215487,
( SELECT o215509.PERIOD_NAME AS as215592_217133_OLD_2, MAX(o215509.START_DATE) AS as215592_217133_OLD FROM ( SELECT gl.period_name ,gl.start_date ,gl.end_date ,gl.period_set_name FROM gl.gl_periods gl ) o215509 WHERE (o215509.PERIOD_SET_NAME = 'JS_GL_Calendar') GROUP BY o215509.PERIOD_NAME)
WHERE ( (o215476.INVOICE_ID = o215473.INVOICE_ID)
and (o215482.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = o215473.DIST_CODE_COMBINATION_ID)
and (o215487.VENDOR_ID = o215476.VENDOR_ID)
and (o215473.PERIOD_NAME = as215592_217133_OLD_2(+)))
AND (o215482.SEGMENT6 LIKE :"Project Parameter 1")
AND (o215482.SEGMENT5 LIKE :"Category Code Parameter 1")
AND (o215482.SEGMENT4 LIKE :"Business Unit Parameter 1")
AND (o215482.SEGMENT3 LIKE :"Cost Centre Parameter 1")
AND (o215482.SEGMENT2 LIKE :"Account Parameter 1")
AND (o215482.SEGMENT1 LIKE :"Company Parameter 1")
AND (o215473.PERIOD_NAME LIKE :"Period Name Parameter 1")
AND (o215487.SEGMENT1 LIKE :"Supplier Number Parameter 1")
AND (o215476.CANCELLED_DATE IS NULL )
AND ( ( UPPER(o215473.LINE_TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE) = UPPER('ITEM') OR UPPER(o215473.LINE_TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE) = UPPER('FREIGHT') ) )
ORDER BY o215482.SEGMENT1 ASC , o215482.SEGMENT3 ASC , o215482.SEGMENT2 ASC , o215482.SEGMENT4 ASC , o215487.SEGMENT1 ASC , o215487.VENDOR_NAME ASC , (SUBSTR(o215476.INVOICE_NUM,1,12)) ASC ;
Kindly help.
Thanks,
S

Performance Degradation of HR Disco reports after upgrade from 1158 - 11510

Hi there
Has anyone else seen a degradation in performance between 4i and 10.1.2 on apps HR modules? Or indeed not against HR modules.
Following an upgrade from 1158 to 11510 we have seen significant downturn in performance of long standing HR reports. We are using Discoverer desktop in both cases and have a query that is scheduled overnight and usually completed in 2 hours using 4i against the 1158. Now it's taking more like 15 or more using discoverer 10.1.2 against the 11510 environment. We have tested using 4i against 11510 environment and this performs fine, in fact better than it used to in 1158, so it looks like Discoverer 1012 is causing the downturn in performance.
Anyone got anything to share on this??
Cheers, Kate
Message was edited by:
kaubon

Kaubon,
There is a difference between oracle 9i and 10g database.
If you are using optimizer_features_enable="9.2.0.8" to revert back to the old behavior then you are not utilizing the updated feature of 10g. You are making 10g to follow 9i behavior.
It is just like buying a new car and damaging it to get the feel of your old car.
We had the similar problem, but we fine tune all our queries according to 10g. Main problem was use of rules. You need to either remove those rules or modify those rules.
There are few good documents of 10g performance on metalink. You can refer to that.
All the best.
Soham khot
http://oracleappshr.blogspot.com

Query to a TS200v upgrade from celery to vroom-vroom

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for