Question about monitors

Im trying to find a good monitor to use at home for Graphic Design, Web Design and 3D animation.
I have 2 x 20" Samsung displays that are only 1600x900 res.  I found a couple of brands that Im considering but would like feedback if anyone has used or owns these specific brands.
1st is AOC... I2353PH and AOC e2752Vh... 1 is a 23" and the other is a 27".
2nd is HANNS G... HZ281HPB... This one is a 28"
All three are great prices, the AOC 23" is $189 the 27" is $289 as well as the HANNS 28" is also $289.
Im just tryin to find something affordable big, and that will last me a while with good resolution as well.  I believe all 3 of these screens are IPS.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

A search for "best large monitors" turn up a Hans G that you mentioned
Best 27-Inch to 30-inch LCD Monitors
Macpreformance guide has their favorites:
http://macperformanceguide.com/RecommendedDisplays.html

Similar Messages

  • ADC and The G3 Question about Monitors

    My G3 Blue and White PowerMac is running great running OS X but my clunky monitor is starting to take up alot of desk space. I would like to add a 15" ADC Monitor to it (just to keep my apple apple). I currently know that I need the DVI to ADC adapter with the power brick to support the monitors power needs, and that my VGA graphics card cannot support this at all. Leaving the question what is the best card for the job? Do I need a vintage sort of card or is there a newer card that will support it (computer and monitor). Thanks for your help. Oh and I'm going to upgrade to Tiger soon in the future if that helps. Thanks anything is appreciated.

    Sorry Wrong place to post

  • Question about monitor calibration

    I'm hoping someone can tell me what role the monitor factory settings play on monitor calibration.  My Spyder 3 Elite calibration device tells me (before I start calibration) that I should reset the factory settings on my monitor.  On my old monitor I didn't know what the factory settings were and couldn't find a way to reset them.  My new monitor just arrived today with a brightness setting of over 90 (on a scale from 0-100, and the contrast setting was around 80.  The first thing I did when I turned the monitor on was to change that because the display was so bright I could hardly read the forum on it.  I can't imagine that those are the "factory settings" that I am supposed to use!  Thanks!

    This is actually a VERY good question, because the initial settings will affect, to some extent, how you'll see all things that are not color-managed.
    Things get even more complicated if you're going to maintain two monitors and would like them to more or less match.
    What I'd do is spend some time, before firing up the profiling device, to try to set the on-monitor settings so that you have a comfortable brightness level and get the response as close as possible to gamma 2.2.  Then the video card curve cablibration process won't have as much to change.
    There's a chart I like to use to see if the gamma is close to 2.2:
    First, make sure any remnants of a monitor profile from your old monitor are removed, and that you're back to defaults (e.g., sRGB IEC61966-2.1).
    Make sure and view the above chart at 100% full size, and using your on-monitor controls try to get the gray bars in the left column to seem as one smooth gradient, the same brightness from side to side.  Also, you should barely be able to see dark gray on black squares in the top-right black bar on white background.
    Depending on your monitor gamut, you may not be able to get all the color out of the center column, but get it as close as possible.  Then you'll leave the calibration/profiling process a good starting point, and you shouldn't be hugely disappointed in what you see from your non-color-managed applications.
    -Noel

  • A question about monitor settings and printing?

    I have a new PC with an HD monitor, it didn't come with an HDMI cable, but a VGA one, I recently got the HDMI and I noticed that comparatively when using the VGA cable & using the default monitor settings that the darks were darker than when using the HDMI with default settings, (the colour depth looked best with the VGA) I'm using PE9 and need to make an image to have printed at the printers, I would love to use the HDMI cable, but I'm concerned that if I do (and I change the monitors default settings for contrast, hue...etc to compensate) that... it will have been edited here one way and look totally different on the print shops monitor...
    ... So, how can I be sure it will come back from the printers looking the same as I had edited it?
    Should I give up with the HDMI cable? I also have PrE 9 for video editing, so I'm a bit confused at to what is best to do...
    Thanks.

    There are no free calibration tools.  Like most things you get what you pay for.  However, the low end versions are quite good, so take a look at the Xrite Huey.
    This will get your display calibrated which ensures you see the best rendering of the image on screen.  It does not guarantee good print matching since this also requires a print colour managed process and good viewing conditions.
    Colour settings in Elements are mis-leading.  They apply to new documents being created in Elements or to images being opened that don't contain a colour profile.  Virtually all JPEG images from cameras will have a profile tagged in them.  So choose any setting but not the one that says 'No Colour Management'.  The best default in my opinion is 'Optimise for Screen'
    Colin

  • Simple Question about 'Monitor Clients' on WCS

    Hello
    When I use WCS and go the 'Clients' tab on the Home page and then click 'Associated Clients' it shows me a whole list of usernames/MAC adresses/ip addresses/ etc.
    One of these column titles is 'Protocol'.
    On some of my entries there is an AP with a MAC of 00:00:00:00:00:00 (which I know is a cosmetic bug that is not resolved by Cisco) but its 'Protocol' state is show as 'Mobile' rather than 802.11b or 802.11g.
    Does anyone know why the 'Protocol' is classed as Mobile? What does it mean, if anything?
    thanks
    Bryn

    Hi I read your post. I see the "mobile" status of clients on my network when they are being forwarded from another wireless controller via a mobility group. I use this feature for our guest network. Do you have any of your WLC's in the same mobility group or any kind of guest network?

  • Question about using iMac 2011 as a monitor

    hi ,, i have imac 2011 21'5
    can i use as a monitor to play xbox 360 on it using mini displayport to hdmi cable ??
    if no then is there way else i can play xbox on my imac screen

    Frank:
    Thanks so much for responding! One question about your post. When you say that the Mac Mini cannot boot in OS 9, does that mean that if I wanted it to hold Filemaker Pro 4 files (which runs on OS 9), that it cannot do this? We would not be running Filemaker on the Mini, just storing the files. We would run Filemaker off of our desktop computers. Sorry, I don't know a ton about computers, so sometimes I need clarification about the terms that people use.-Rob

  • Basic questions about macbook pro + external monitor

    Hi,
    I have some very basic questions about using a Macbook Pro + external display. I don't actually have them but need to know how things works.
    So, here they are:
    1) Can I use the external display as the main display?
    2) Will the external display run with its resolution or with that of the mbook pro?
    3) Somewhere I read that you cannot keep the macbook pro open and get the full resolution of the external display. Is that true ?
    4) Is it dangerous to keep the mbook closed while using the external display?
    5) Does the usage of the external display impact on mbook performance?
    I know...a lot of questions , but would be nice if someone could help me.
    Thanks.

    Hi - I am presently using an external display.
    To answer your questions in sequence:
    1. Yes you can use the external display as your main display. The way to enable that mode is to put your MacBook Pro to sleep, attach the external display. Wake up your MBPro with the lid closed and you will see the external display as you main display. You can alternatively set the external to "Mirror" your notebook by using preferences/display.
    2. The external display will run at its resolution although you can adjust and calibrate it using Preferences/Display.
    3. Not true. You get max resolution on both displays. Of course you may have to tweak as mentioned above.
    4. Not at all. I use this mode all the time. Just make sure you initially set up as mentioned above and your LCD on the MBPro will stay off.
    5. I have not seen any performance degradation whatsoever.
    Hope this helps.

  • Re: Question about the Satellite P300-18Z

    Hello everyone,
    I have a couple of questions about the Satellite P300-18Z.
    What "video out" does this laptop have? (DVI, s-video or d-sub)
    Can I link the laptop up to a LCD-TV and watch movies on a resolution of 1080p? (full-HD)
    What is the warranty on this laptop?

    Hello
    According the notebook specification Satellite P300-18Z has follow interfaces:
    DVI - No DVI port available
    HDMI - HDMI-out (HDMI out port available)
    Headphone Jack - External Headphone Jack (Stereo) available
    .link - iLink (Firewire) port available
    Line in Jack - No Line in Jack port available
    Line out Jack - No Line Out Jack available
    Microphone Jack - External Micrphone Jack
    TV-out - port available (S-Video port)
    VGA - VGA (External monitor port RGB port)
    Also you can connect it to your LCD TV using HDMI cable.
    Warranty is country specific and clarifies this with your local dealer but I know that all Toshiba products have 1 year standard warranty and also 1 year international warranty. you can of course expand it.

  • Questions about editing with io HD or Kona 3 cards

    My production company is switching from Avid to Final Cut Pro. I have a few editing system questions (not ingesting and outputting, just questions about systems for the actual editors - we will have mac pros with either kona 3 or io HD for ingest and outputs)
    1) Our editors work from home so they most likely will be using MacBook Pros - Intel Core 2 Duo 2.6GHz 4GB computers with eSata drives to work on uncompressed HD, will they be able to work more quickly in FCP if they are using the new Mac Pro 8-Core (2 Quad-Core 2.8GHz Intel Xeon) or will the mac book pro's be able to hold their own with editing hour long documentaries, uncompressed HD
    2) Will having an AJA Kona 3 (if we get the editors mac pros) or io HD (for the mac book pros) connected be a significant help to the editor's and their process, will it speed up their work, will it allow them to edit sequences without having to render clips of different formats? Or will they be just as well off without editing with the io HD?
    I'm just trying to get a better understanding of the necessity of the AJA hardware in terms of working with the editors to help them do what they have to do with projects that have been shot on many formats- DVCPro tapes, Aiptek cameras that create QTs and P2 footage.
    Thanks

    1. with the IoHD, laptops become OK working with ProRes and simply eSata setups. Without the Io, they can't view externally on a video monitor (a must in my book). It will not speed up rendering a ton, nor will it save renders of mixed formats. The idea is to get all source footage to ProRes with the Io, and then the Io also lifts the CPU from having to convert ProRes to something you can monitor externally on a video monitor, and record back to any tape format you want... all in real time.
    2. Kona 3's on Towers would run circles around render times on a Laptop... no matter what the codec, but the Kona does not really speed renders up. That's a function of the CPU and just how fast is it. (lots of CPU's at faster speeds will speed up render times).
    I'd recommend you capture to ProRes with Io's or the Kona 3 and don't work in uncompressed HD. You gain nothing doing it quality wise at all. And you only use up a ton of disk space (6 times the size in fact) capturing and working in uncompressed HD, which from your post, you're not shooting anyway. The lovely thing about ProRes is that it's visually lossless, efficient, and speeds up the editing process. Mixing formats can be done, but it's better to go to ProRes for all source footage, and edit that way.
    With either the Kona or the Io, you then can output to uncompressed HD tape... that's what they do for you no matter what codec you've edited in. ProRes is designed to be the codec of choice for all HD projects when you're shooting different formats especially... Get them all singing the same tune in your editing stations, and you'll be a much happier camper. Only reason to buy laptops is portability... otherwise you're much better off with towers and the Kona 3 speed wise.
    Jerry
    Message was edited by: Jerry Hofmann

  • Questions about mac mini iTunes server, streaming to macbook pro, ipads, etc.

    I'm thinking about getting a mac mini to work with my NAS as a iTunes server. I have a bunch of questions about this. I will have two iPhones, a few iPads, and a laptop that will be accessing the files. I have iTunes match. This is basically to keep an always on computer for hosting the music/movies. My questions are as follows . . .
    #1 Are there any good, comprehensive guides to show you how to do this?
    #2 Can the movies be accessed when not at home on the shared network?
    #3 Can the iPads or the macbook pro download the shared movies to be stored locally?
    #4 Back to #3, how will it work on my macbook pro with listening to music (I have iTunes match)? Say i go to library and I break out my macbook pro and I don't have internet. What happens if I download music while at home onto my macbook pro to listen to it when I go to the library? Will i start a new library on my macbook pro? How will that mesh with the home server when I come back.
    #5 Is there a way to mirror files or folders? So something that I have on my macbook pro will also mirror on the home server.
    Thanks for your help on this. I'll post any follow up questions.

    seanfenton wrote:
    1. I want to replace the Optical drive with a 2TB SATA. can I use this 2.5 inch?
    I do not know if it is the same model number, but this one will work in your MBP:
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/SEAGATE%20OWC/ST2000LM003M/
    2. I want to replace the HD with a 128GB SSD 840. When I replace these drives, will my OS still be in tact? I have never done this job before.
    No. You will have to format the drives in Disk Utility>Erase to Mac OS Extended (Journaled) and then install the OSX by using the original install disks.
    3.) I want to replace the ram sticks to max capacity. This is 2 2GB sticks, Correct?
    No.  An early 17" 2008 MBP will accept 6GB RAM with the following specifications:  200-pin PC2-5300 (667MHz) DDR2 SO-DIMM.  The best sources of Mac compatible RAM are OWC and Crucial.
    4.) Most difficult...
    I want to extend the monitor wirelessly to a projector. I thought about using Apple TV and Airplay. However, support for airplay is for MacBooks 2011 and newer. I thought of using a PS3 and the media server, but I think this brings on a format compatibility issue. (my library is so large I could not afford to convert all my movies to MP4.) So, how would you recommend I put my extended monitor with VLC player onto a projector?
    Could I possibly connect the MBP to a Mac Mini as an extension? would this work natively? I would rather use a VGA cord than F with 3rd party app BS.
    Cannot help you there.
    5..) I want to Bypass iTunes this time around. I would prefer to use Finder and VLC to manage all of my music. I mostly play all my music on shuffle, so, could I create a playlist on VLC with all of my music and play it randomly? (im sure this is possible but i'd like to organize all my plans with confirmation.)
    You are not obligated to use iTunes.
    6.) Can i upgrade the keyboard to backlit? i've read that this is possible.
    All MBPs have back lighted keyboards.  Your either needs a NVRAM reset or a repair.
    Ciao.

  • A few questions about Patone colors

    I have a few questions about patone colors since this is the first time I use them. I want to use them to create a letterhead and business cards in two colors.
    1)
    I do understand that the uncoated is more washed out than the coated patone colors. I heard that this is because the way paper absorbs the inkt. This is why the same inkt results in different colors on different paper (right?). My question is why is the patone uncoated black so much different than normal black (c=0 m=0 y=0 k=100) or rich black:
    When I print a normal document with cmyk, I can get pretty dark black colors. Why is it that I cannot have that dark black color with patone colors? Even text documents printed on a cheap printer can get a darker color than the Patone color. It just looks way too grey for me.
    2) For a first mockup, I want to print the patone colors as cmyk (since I put like 10 different colors on a page for fast comparison). I know that these cmyk colors differ from the patone colors and that I cannot get a 100% representation. But is there a way to convert patone to cmyk values?
    I hope that some of you can help me out with my questions.
    Thanks.

    You can get Pantone's CMYK tints in Illustrator, (Swatches Panel > Open Swatch Library > Color Books > PANTONE+ Color Bridge Coated or Uncoated) but in my view, what's the point?  If you're printing to a digital printer, just use RGB (HSB) or CMYK. Personally, I never use Pantone's CMYK so-called "equivalents."
    Pantone colors are all mixed pigmented inks, many of which fluoresce beyond the gamut limits of RGB and especially CMYK. The original Pantone Matching System (PMS) was created for the printing industry. It outlined pigmented ink formulations for each of its colors.
    Most digital printers (laser or inkjet) use CMYK. The CMYK color gamut is MUCH SMALLER than what many mixed inks, printed on either coated or uncoated papers can deliver. When you specify non-coated Pantone ink in AI, according to Pantone's conversion tables, AI tries to "approximate" what that color will look like on an uncoated sheet, using CMYK. -- In my opinion, this has little relevance to real-world conditions, and is to be avoided in most situations.
    If your project is going to be printed on a printing press with spot Pantone inks, then by all means, use Pantone colors. But don't trust the screen colors; rather get a Pantone swatch book and look at the actual inks on both coated and uncoated papers, according to the stock you will use on the press.
    With the printing industry rapidly dwindling in favor of the web and inkjet printers, Pantone has attempted to extend its relevance beyond the pull-date by publishing (in books and in software alliances, with such as Adobe) its old PMS inks, and their supposed LAB and CMYK equivalents. I say "supposed" because again, RGB monitors and CMYK inks can never be literally equivalent to many Pantone inks. But if you're going to print your project on a printing press, Pantone inks are still very relevant as "spot colors."
    I also set my AI Preferences > Appearance of Black to both Display All Blacks Accurately, and Output All Blacks Accurately. The only exception to this might be when printing on a digital printer, where there should be no registration issues.
    Rich black in AI is a screen phenomenon, unless in Prefs > Appearance of Black, you also specify "Output All Inks As Rich Black," -- something I would NEVER do if outputting for an actual printing press. I always set my blacks in AI to "Output All Blacks Acurately" when outputting for a press. If you fail to do this, then on the press you will see any minor registration problems, with C, M, and Y peeking out, especially around black type.  UGH!
    Good luck!  :+)

  • Basic Questions About Compiling Source

    Hi!
    I have some very basic questions about compiling source on 10.6. BTW, if the unix discussions still exist, they've hidden them pretty well, so I hope I'm in the right place for this!
    First off, you simply cd to the source dir, wherever it may be - in my case ~/Downloads/source/  - and during the install process, everything will be installed in its proper dir, right?
    How do you know which compiler to use? There seem to be several: make, gmake, gcc, g++, etc...
    Once you do figure out which compiler to run, the process is supposed to go like this, right?
    ./configure
    make (or whatever)
    make install
    But this doesn't always work for me. For instance, I'm trying to compile 'arm', but it doesn't seem to have a 'configure' script.
    $ ls ~/Downloads/arm
    ChangeLog
    README
    armrc.sample
    setup.py
    LICENSE
    arm
    install
    /src
    Maybe it's that 'setup.py' file? What are you supposed to do?
    Of course, it's not only this one that's given me trouble. Sometimes the readme will say I have to edit a certain file for my system. Are there just a few standard changes you always make? Or is it...how can I put it...complicated? How do you find out what's needed in those cases?
    OS 10.6.8
    Xcode 3.2.4
    Python 2.7

    sudont wrote:
    I have some very basic questions about compiling source on 10.6. BTW, if the unix discussions still exist, they've hidden them pretty well, so I hope I'm in the right place for this!
    This is the place for UNIX discussions. If you have developer-related questions, there is a forum dedicated to that as well: Developer Forums
    First off, you simply cd to the source dir, wherever it may be - in my case ~/Downloads/source/  - and during the install process, everything will be installed in its proper dir, right?
    Yes. Hopefully the project you want to install follows standard conventions. If so, you can do "./configure", then "make", and finally "sudo make install" to install the software into "/usr/local".
    How do you know which compiler to use? There seem to be several: make, gmake, gcc, g++, etc...
    The make file will figure that stuff out.
    Once you do figure out which compiler to run, the process is supposed to go like this, right?
    ./configure
    make (or whatever)
    make install
    Yes, with the addition of "sudo" before "make install" because "/usr/local" is owned by root.
    But this doesn't always work for me. For instance, I'm trying to compile 'arm', but it doesn't seem to have a 'configure' script.
    $ ls ~/Downloads/arm
    ChangeLog
    README
    armrc.sample
    setup.py
    LICENSE
    arm
    install
    /src
    arm? You mean "arm (anonymizing relay monitor) - Terminal status monitor for Tor relays." You really don't want to be messing with that stuff. The only people involved with Tor that are trustworthy are US Navy intelligence who have their own uses for it. If you don't understand it as well as they do, best stay away.

  • Question about setup_MITE in the PCI-MIO-16E-1

    I have a quick question about setup_MITE in the PCI-MIO-16E-1. In one of the manuals, it states that if you're using Dell Optiplex GX series for our hardware configuration, is it true we need to re-write the MITE functions to correlate with the hardware? Please if you can clarify what this means, I would really appreciate it. Thank you in advance.

    National Instruments is starting a new newsgroup to provide a forum for customers to discuss register level programming issues and ask questions. This newsgroup is not a direct support channel for register level programming, but may be monitored by National Instruments engineers. Please post you question with additional detail in:
    natinst.public.daq.driver-development.general
    Christian
    Christian Loew, CLA
    Principal Systems Engineer, National Instruments
    Please tip your answer providers with kudos.
    Any attached Code is provided As Is. It has not been tested or validated as a product, for use in a deployed application or system,
    or for use in hazardous environments. You assume all risks for use of the Code and use of the Code is subject
    to the Sample Code License Terms which can be found at: http://ni.com/samplecodelicense

  • Question about Stacking

    Hello Everyone,
    I have a quick question about stackwise plus technology. I would like to confirm that there is no redundancy at the ethernet switch port in terms of a physical problem. The reason I ask is that we are deploying stacked switches shortly to ensure high availability but curious to know whether anyone has seen issues with physical ports failing and not the chassis/PSUs. I understand that Etherchannels can be used but we have security cameras that cannot suffer any outages and would be connected to a single port on the stack. I'm guessing that my option is to monitor the Switch Ports statistics via SNMP and move the camera to another port if this ever happens.
    Thanks in advance.
    Cheers.
    Evan

    Disclaimer
    The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    Sure, ports can fail without the whole switch failing, but edge redundancy, such as using dual links (often configured as a bundled channel), between the host and two stack members addresses both switch port failure and stack member failure.
    Unless your security cameras support dual links, your going to have a single point of failure at the edge port.
    Next best options, as you've already noted, would be to have, on-line, "warm" spare ports that you can quickly repatch into.  Ideally you have enough spare ports to allowing repatching in case a whole switch member fails.
    (BTW, when you have spare ports, you don't have to set aside a whole stack member, sitting empty.  For example, instead of having a dual stack with only one switch member populated, and the other not at all, split the populated ports across both stack members.  That way, if a stack member fails, you don't lose all your hosts, only half.  [With cameras, depending on their views, you might be able to overlap their coverage across multiple stack member.])

  • From USB to IEEE-1394: question about HD capture, editing, sharing.

    I’m new to editing video but have a question about capturing video into Premiere Elements 7. I have been using a Canon HF11 which shoots only in HD and only has USB output to copy video to my desktop. I don’t have a Blu-ray burner yet but I have burned a few projects to DVD, shared video on YouTube, and saved files in .avi and .mpeg to view on computer screens. But obviously I’m missing out on sharing HD on disk at this time. I just bought a Canon XH A1s which shoots both HD and SD on miniDV tapes. And uses IEEE-1394 cable for capturing (to Pre7). I did a 3 minute test project in SD and burned it on a DVD disk. I was very pleased at the results and the ease of editing. I don’t have any HD tapes yet, but when I do what differences will I experience from shooting in HD and then capturing, editing, then to sharing? My current HD processes with the HF11 is slow, occasional low-resources warnings, and less then pleasing results on DVD disks. Thanks for any and all comments and/or suggestions.

    Your HF11 is AVCHD format and the Canon XH A1 is HDV MPEG2. AVCHD takes a lot more computer horespower to edit compared to HDV MPEG2... main reason being that AVCHD is more highly compressed giving small file sizes. This is also why you get the low resource and memory alarms while editing.
    To shoot HD you do not need HD miniDV tapes you can use the standard miniDV tapes. However the HD tapes are supposed to give fewer drop-outs than the standard tapes but are considerable more expensive. With DV-AVI a drop out would be hardly noticed, but as HDV MPEG2 is a compressed format and the picture relies on information in a number of frames any drop-outs can give a second or so of bad video. That said I have had very few issues with drop-outs. If you are doing a wedding or something important that you do not want to risk then probably better to use a HD miniDV tape.
    In the past the advise has been to capture in high definition to get the best quality and then downconvert in the camcorder and capture in DV-AVI... the reason being that older versions of Premiere Elements did not do a good job of the down conversion. Reports on PE7 indicate it is better and that you could use a HDV workflow and burn to DVD as a last stage. This also allows you to export a high definition version of your video to view on a monitor where you can appreciate the higher resolution. Or in the future when you have a Blu-ray burner and player you can burn the file to disc... save doing all the editing all over.

Maybe you are looking for