Question from XP user in market for iMac (Video input)

I would like to buy a Apple desktop for my home. I would like to know what my options are if I want to connect Surround Sound, HD DVD player, external hard drive, Xbox 360, and Digital Cable to the screen. I would like to know if that is possible, if it has inputs and things of that nature. Both my living room TV and Windows HP Desktop are outdated and I would like to knock out 2 birds with one stone, so to speak. Is it possible? And if so, which model(s).
Thank you, all comments would be GREATLY appreciated, I'm not very computer savvy. Thanks.

Hello and Welcome to Apple Discussions. 
Unfortunately no iMac offers any kind of video input out of the box. There are Firewire and USB2.0 video-input devices which are good value but probably won't offer the kind of spec/quality that you will want to input HD DVDs for example.
Here's an example (link). There are HD tuners available too.
BTW, Apple stopped selling iMac G5s back in January of 2006. The current iMacs are termed "Intel iMacs".
kind regards
mrtotes
Message was edited by: mrtotes

Similar Messages

  • LP7 questions from new user

    Hello,
    I am a composer, producer and engineer working in the Los Angeles area. I've been using Pro Tools and Digital Performer for a long time now, and I'm growing increasingly frustrated with them for MIDI and virtual instruments. I have been testing the Logic Express free trial for the past month, and I am very impressed, especially how efficient the CPU usage is compared to PT and DP. I can really accomplish a lot more, without having to freeze or bounce tracks all the time. As a result, I am seriously considering switching to Logic Pro for my composing / sequencing work.
    During this free trial period, I have been browsing this forum, as well as reading the PDF's for Logic Express and Logic Pro and I have had most of my questions answered that way. However, I have been keeping a list of questions that remain unanswered.
    I will be attending the "Power of 7" demo at RSPE here in L.A. on May 4th. I plan on covering these questions with the rep's there. I would also like some feedback from the users "in the trenches". Should I post my list of questions here? Would anyone mind filling in some of the gaps in the owner's manuals for me?
    Thanks for your time!
    PM Quad G5; PB 17" G4; iMac 15" G4; PM 500MHz G4   Mac OS X (10.4.5)   PTLE7; Digi002R; Mbox; DP4.61; MachFive; Komplete2; EWQLSO Gold; MemoryMoog+

    Michael,
    I was in a rush when I responded last. I didn't answer the other questions because I don't know their answers. I was eager to see what the experts say. On this topic, luckily, there are a bunch of very helpful, experienced and intelligent people (as in unicornation) who are here to help- like the guys (not me) who have been answering. I would imagine you'd want to know this, since it's helpful when starting. (the unicornation forum, while stodgier, well... there're a couple of strange posts here once in a while.) (what i think would be great is a forum for multiplatform folk -- like a dp-logic-pt forum.) Or, a translation book. Like mac os for windows folks. (the move is kind of the same thing -- different language, basically you do the same thing-- different vibe)
    So, now hearing what the experts have to say:
    1. General routing: so, compared to DP, this seems to be a weakness. It seems that folks' complains about logic's mixer may be in part due to this. While a little annoying, if comparing to DP, for what's important to me, I don't find this to be a deal breaker. Also, I'd imagine there's a relatively simple work around to achieve what you need. And you mentioned, you'd do more audio in PT.
    I'd like to know more about this. I'll ask when I figure out what I need to ask.
    Here are other things I have found to be cool, when compared with DP:
    1. mute of an individual midi note. It's like the same concept when muting audio, but for a midi note. Never figured why it wasn't available in DP.
    2. multiple tempo tracks ( i haven't used it yet, but seems useful)
    3. oh, here's something that's revolutionized my workflow -
    bounce direct to an aac & add to audio window & itunes & make a full res (24 bit) pcm bounce all with one step. So, in about a minute, with 2 steps (bounce & email) I can send what I am listening to the director/collaborator/friend - bam. This is terrific. DP has an aac option, I just never incorporated it.
    4. i haven't used it yet, but you can bounce music to quicktime video (as in DP, which was wonderful -- ) supposedly, you can also do just the selected by locator section. that's useful.
    5. i really enjoyed & got very fast at using DP's consolidation window. this is very cool. i thought this would be a problem with Logic. However, you can make a window stay in the foreground by selecting option, before you select it. Also there's a stack windows horizontally/vertically -- which can quickly organize it -- but not as fast as consolidation. However, with screensets, which are easy to configure, I figure this is again, is not going to be a problem. I'm using 2 screens now which is helpful in this regard.
    6. it's good to have a very capable, efficient sampler well integrated (with regards to resource management, etc....) I've been getting good results with the exs, using my .gigs + . Also, kontakt 2 runs. A crash with this once in a while.
    7. space designer -- I bought altiverb when i was setting up my new dp system. Figured I wouldn't need space designer. However, altiverb does not run well when I'm running buffer under 256. So, space designer fits this composing-pre mixing stage bill wonderfully.
    8. I like seeing the midi notes in the region view. It's a nice combo of easy region handling + seeing what's inside.
    9. the quantization & region parameter thing -- this is nice as well. I laid down a 2 measure 8th note pulse. Then, painted it across the screen -- this is nice (actually this is the loop function). Then instead, I pressed R-16, and there were bunch of copies of it. Then, in the right places, I quantized the pulse to 1/4 notes, 1/2 notes, whole notes, even triplets -- in such a simple step --
    so, overall -- what i've read seems to be true -- it's a great creation tool
    dp is elegant, and mixer is (may be) more conventional (PT)
    but the learning curve is not that bad -- at times, it's annoying -- but i imagine it's like learning a new language as an adult -- or a new instrument.
    10. so, i like having the region/track parameters. reminds me of my old cubase days.
    11. I have my right click hardwired to mute. Then use option for whatever task i'm currently doing. today, i was working extremely fast selecting, muting, fading/cross fading -- overall view, deeper view -- moving from section to section -- by either simply dragging the cycle bar (which is wonderful) or,
    clicking in new cycle start-stop points (as i used to do in DP) --
    as in DP, I use the period in the number pad to enter a transport location (so this feels just like DP (just quicker) -- then i use the + & - in the number pad to change start & stop times of cycle mode,
    then the / in the number pad to toggle cycle on & off.
    Then, ctrl = to set cycle length to length of region;
    oh, and ctrl-click is hardwired to zoom,
    and ctrl double click on empty arrange goes back a zoom level
    so, with these things i was editing extremely fast.
    My recommendation, which is what I did -- before purchasing, if you are not in a rush, spend the money on the macprovideo.com logic tutorials. these are incredible. martin sitter's explanation style is great. also, go through his & dvorin's text tutorials. do this before you purchase -- if you feel you need more hands on.
    but let me be honest, i was incredibly excited to see things done in logic, and then to do them myself, and to be up to speed super fast
    and, as i said earlier, my intent is to master one -- 'cause it's too complicated (for me) to master several --
    anyway --
    i still believe pro tools is elegant,
    as is DP
    and i miss working in both.
    i would like to work in all --
    but, fancy PT does not make sense for me, & i'm not pro enough to require it's compatibility requirement --
    before logic, i was looking for something that was dp, pt, & live -- but, 1st, the easiest to create on -- it's possible logic may be it
    but, if my biggest reason to move to logic was due to a feeling of sluggishness in DP, that can be addressed by either farming out VI chores to external computers -- which, in the end, (for me) has to be done in logic as well (i'll explain shortly) or getting a newer computer more often --
    so, in the end, i guess, it depends which simply feels best for what's most important
    so, my original reason to move to logic was 'cause it could handle more in one box -- which seems to approximate the fancy PT approach of one session file/folder for everything -- quick recall -- this is incredibly helpful when time is limited, or you have to put something on the backburner, etc.... And, this is most important to me.
    However, loading the large sample libraries in a Logic file becomes a real chore -- 'cause load up times are so long. now, i am being incredibly spoiled - of course. But, there's something convenient about having another computer(s) deal with sampling (& loading) so, you can switch between songs, & not get bogged down as quickly. Also, I have not tried to optimize my workflow yet. And, I was using at one point almost all of my 4.5 G of RAM, using pretty high quality libraries.
    Oh, i forgot to mention, when i 1st got logic express, i kept slamming in altiverbs- i had a little DP project where i was using 7 of them, inefficiently + some MW eq & comps.
    Well, I got to 20 altiverbs in Logic, same system -- before it began coughing & still navigating & saving were incredibly responsive.
    Also, i enjoy "file save as" while playing -- DP couldn't do this.
    And, at 1st, i found logic channel eq to be annoying to deal with, compared with DP MW eq -- but, i got the hang of it & enjoy it.
    Oh yes, automation -- it's fast & easy. I read about problems with this. I haven't experienced them yet. It's very fast. There's not a bunch of tools to do what you need to do -- you just kind of do it (it's more than that), but meaning, what you want to do can be accomplished with what seems to be fewer clicks.
    I miss the following in DP: the ability to type in a value - for automation for example.
    Oh, coming from DP, check out the Event Float (options window, or opt e). I liked how DP displayed and manipulated this info; it's mostly (if not all) available in logic -- i've got to figure this out.
    So, I'm not as experienced and aware of what Logic can do as the experts here who have been very helpful to me, but I hope this is somewhat helpful.
    I tried because I was in a similar situation as yours; except, I did not have as much time invested in DP as you have. This complicates your decision more, I believe.
    Oh, and basically everything that's in the logic pro book tutorial (dvorin) is not in express -- so, it's ok to judge the basics of logic with express -- but, it's not enough to really judge it.
    i guess, it is a $1000 question.
    so, i know i'm wordy -- & not very informative, & i am unable to answer the 10 questions -- but, i was trying to address it from a recent dp -> logic perspective.
    a yoga teacher asked me if i read thriller novels; my wife laughed & uncomfortably said, "uh, he doesn't read books. he reads manuals, textbooks, and gear mags." well, i'm currently happily not subscribed to any gear **** mags -- they're great -- just figured, now i got to get into what i have -- & not look around anymore. but of course, i've been seeing what the reaction to dp5 is. seems that's is possible that they've done something that's got the snappy thing done -- oy vey. (& the audio window enhancement, with live elastic audio - like functions, & folders, & a basic sampler, and possibly audio instrument like channels, and i wonder how they're freeze is doing.) Maybe I am insane. Not much more than others here. Which is why I stop by. Kind of 12-stepish.
    danny

  • Exam 1Z0-007 and questions from Controlling User Access

    Hi,
    I am preparing for exam 1Z0-007 and going to give this exam in two weeks. I like to confirm if "Controlling User Access" topic is part of this exam 1Z0-007? I have checked on Oracle website and this topic is not a part if this exam anymore unless they add it later.
    Has anyone recently given this exam and were there any questions related to "Controlling User Access" or user Privileges?
    Thanks

    user10878991 wrote:
    Hi,
    I am preparing for exam 1Z0-007 and going to give this exam in two weeks. I like to confirm if "Controlling User Access" topic is part of this exam 1Z0-007? I have checked on Oracle website and this topic is not a part if this exam anymore unless they add it later.
    Has anyone recently given this exam and were there any questions related to "Controlling User Access" or user Privileges?
    ThanksI recommend people are very very very careful in answering this question as it could be very easy to breach one's certification candidate agreement.
    Rgds - bigdelboy.
    Edited by: bigdelboy on 27-Dec-2009 04:26
    It is certainly true the topic you mentioned is in ISBN: 007-219537-1 printed in 2001.
    It is also apparent, unless bigdelboy's eyeball is deceiving him, the topic does not appear in [http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=41&p_org_id=28&lang=US&p_exam_id=1Z0_007] which is authorative.
    I have not followed these things that closely until recently, however this will not be the only example of an OraclePress/Sybex book being left behind because of errata/topic updates etc. These often occur when the exams are update for new releases, eg from 10gR1 to 10gR2; or for when the exam moves from beta to production (sometimes these books are prepared and even pulbished while exam is in beta). In your case I suspect the change quite probably have occured when the exam moved from 9gR1 to 9gR2 or to better accomodate the WDP programme. The exam may also be influenced by the content of Oracle training courses that are being taught and from time to time these will be chaged for a variety of reasons.
    How you handle it is up to you ..... you may:
    - ignore these topics. IMHO you are always entitled to complain if questions asked did not sigificantly match the published topics and you feel this caused you to fail. (I assume the remedy would be a retake voucher). You can hit a comment button on the question and also a comment button the the end of the exam. This is a sort of negative approproach.
    - Go over these topics. If your're serious about Oracle you really need to understand this anyway. See it as an opportunity. A few hours revision ought tosee you able to answer 50% of he topics. This is a positive approach. And this if how certification study ought to be .... sometimes it good to investigate a non examined topic that is interesting.

  • Copy iTunes Music from one User to Another, Same iMac

    I'm running OS X 10.7, iTunes 10, and I want to copy  (not share, _copy_) my iTunes music library from one user to another on the same iMac.
    Please don't give me a solutioon that works on your OS X 10.5 or 10.6 software as 10.7 seems to be quite different and those answers do not work.

    Choose Go to Folder from the Finder's Go menu, provide /Users/Shared/ as the path, drag it to that folder, log in from the other account, and copy it from there. Alternatively, log in from the other account, open the first account's home folder, drag it to the desired location, and authenticate when prompted.
    (70510)

  • I can not send pictures from photo via my OUTLOOK for IMAC

    I just installed Photo  as part of the New OS Yosimete and now I cant send pictures from the library via my OUTLOOK for IMAC

    I've opened up a enhancement request with Apple. Photos is not ready for prime time in my opinion. I've tried to work around this issue by trying to attach a photo in Outlook, but the Photos media browser (which worked fine with iPhoto) does not work at all, either. Both of these features work fine when you're using Apple's Mail application. So it's either Microsoft doesn't support the new Photos, or Apple doesn't support Outlook.

  • How do i set up a mac book from a user account on an iMac?

    i have just got a mac book pro and want to set it up to a user account on an imac? there are more than one user account and i dont want everything to be move across, what's the best way of doing it?

    I am assuming you want to add an existing .mac account to your Mail app on your MacBook?
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1277

  • Thunderbolt port for HDMI video input?

    I want to use the HDMI out from my Canon 5D Mkii as a live video input to thunderbolt. Any support for this people know about? Software or hardware must be available soon right?

    Black magic intensity extreme

  • Question from PSE user: does Lightroom offer a better tagging workflow than Elements?

    I would just like to piggyback onto this question, rather than start a new thread.
    I have been a user of Elements since before it was called Elements. But I have grown increasingly dissatisfied with the product over the last couple years as it has not improved any in its organizational features.
    My primary usage is for organizing. I tag all my photos so that I can search and find things easily. I have 2 main problems with the Elements workflow. #1 is simply that the application takes a long time to launch and become responsive. Sometimes it takes 30 seconds before any of the UI will respond to clicks. Yes, I have a lot of photos, (~20,000) But I don't know if Lightroom may be more powerful or more efficient in that regard.
    #2 is the primary problem. Tagging takes forever. I have so many tags that there is a long list that runs off the screen. If I am tagging a series of shots that have different combinations of people in them, and those tags are spread out in my list, it takes forever to tag, select, tag more, scroll around to select and unselect tags, tag some more, repeat the process. It's excruciating. I've left feedback for Adobe several times through the years that they should add a recently used tags window where recently used tags will float to the top so that they are always available without having to scroll around to get to them. But they have not improved the tagging workflow one bit over the years.
    So the question boils down to, does Lightroom do a better job in the tagging workflow? Is what I described easier in LR? I'm sure that I will download a trial to check it out, but i just wanted to know if an experienced user has thoughts on that.
    Thanks

    I don't have a weak machine, I'm running with 8GB of RAM and an SSD for my applications drive, although the catalog is on a regular hard drive that I use as the data drive.
    This is most likely irrelevant to your Elements speed issues. Repairing or optimizing the catalog file may help
    I'm not sure how a hierarchy will help with the tags, as I already have them arranged in groups of family and groups of friends. The problem is that you get events with a lot of people from different groups and there's no way to avoid having to hunt all up and down the list. You can't really predict what grouping of people will apply. That's why I've really been hoping for a recently used tag list...that would be sooo perfect.
    Yes, but the ability to search for keywords and type a few letters in and see related keywords will help.
    So if you have just tagged a photo with the Anderson Jones keyword (because someone in the photo was named Anderson Jones), and now you need to also tag the same photo with the William Barber keyword (because someone in the photo was named William Barber), you don't really need to scroll, you just need to type in a few letters of William and then select the proper keyword from a much shorter list.

  • IOS & iPhone new features questions from Android user

    Hi there. I have heard good things about the new iOS 8.3 and iPhone 6 but find certain aspects restrictive . I'm an Android user for five years running and would like to explore more on the issue / owning an iPhone by focussing on things that matter to me on my day to day use of a phone:
    1. Is there a custom equaliser setting that one can set via the iPhone or iPad itself without setting it on iTunes?
    2. Sharing photos
    I have downloaded Dropbox, signed-in, set sharing to Photos enabled and yet it doesn't show when i want to share/forward my photos. Would this sound like a bug or incompatibility with iOS?
    3. Any new battery saving option (like Android) on iOS 8.3?
    4. Any further improvements in terms of support for 3rd-party sharing & saving options like for instance in Shazam and Evernote?
    5. I have a Chromecast and i would like to cast/stream my files so i can listen to my TV. Is there any app to do that?
    6. Is there a way to save an entire article (news or a tech article) from Safari or a third-party app to another app such as Evernote or Notepad? (for reading later)
    Any comments are much appreciated. Many thanks.

    gino_76ph wrote:
    2. Sharing photos
    I have downloaded Dropbox, signed-in, set sharing to Photos enabled and yet it doesn't show when i want to share/forward my photos. Would this sound like a bug or incompatibility with iOS?
    Have you enabled Camera Upload in Dropbox's Settings?
    6. Is there a way to save an entire article (news or a tech article) from Safari or a third-party app to another app such as Evernote or Notepad? (for reading later)
    You can tap on the Activities icon (box with an arrow pointing up and out), tap on the More item on the bottom row (scroll to right if needed) and enable Convert to PDF. Then it can be opened in iBooks, the official PDF reader amongst other things, or install the latest Acrobat DC instead. If the article is already in PDF format, you'll find a Send To… item amongst the allowed activities.
    BTW, have you downloaded or read online the full iPhone manual?

  • Question from Photoshop User Wanting to Upgrade to Premier Pro

    Hi - hoping someone can offer some advice here.
    I am a professional aerial photographer, although that may be a misnomer, because all my work is about video (rather than stills). I've been using Photoshop (Creative Cloud package) for all my video editing for over a year, but find myself needing a few features that are only in Premier Pro.
    My questions are:
    Does Premier Pro use .psd files like PS? I would love to have a seamless transition and be able to pull up my exising .psd files which I created in PS, to allow me to do further editing, etc.
    Any thoughts on changing over? Will this be a big step change? I don't really want to disrupt my operations too much. I fully realise these are open/subjective questions, but any opinions will be appreciated!
    Can I still edit the occasional still photo? I'll probably purchase Premier Pro with a Creative Cloud package anyway, so does that come with the ability to edit stills?
    Thanks,
    Jacques

    Pr Pro works very well with Photoshop. You can import psd files as separate layers, or merged together, or as a sequence with the layers stacked.
    Does Premier Pro use .psd files like PS? I would love to have a seamless transition and be able to pull up my exising .psd files which I created in PS, to allow me to do further editing, etc.
    Having both Pr and Ps to work with is a big plus. It may take some learning on your part, but I would think that will go fast. Besides, that's what we're here for, to help you.
    Any thoughts on changing over? Will this be a big step change? I don't really want to disrupt my operations too much. I fully realise these are open/subjective questions, but any opinions will be appreciated!
    The psd files can be opened for editing in Ps from within Pr. The saved edits then appear in Pr when you switch back
    Can I still edit the occasional still photo? I'll probably purchase Premier Pro with a Creative Cloud package anyway, so does that come with the ability to edit stills?

  • Would there be a market for a Video Editing Only iMac?

    Would it be smart of Apple to (and they can) to make a Super Editing (iMac) Machine? Here is what I would include:
    1: A 2 TB SATA Boot Drive
    2: 2/ 2 TB SS Drives
    3: 2 Optical Drives One BluRay   (1 on eacf side of the computer)
    4: A Multi Disc reader that can take any kind of card. Especially CF
    5: Of course the fastest Graphics Card and such (i.e. Hyperthreading ect.)
    6: 64 GB of Memory - Standard  16GB cards in Quad Core x 4
    7: 4 TBolt, 2 FW800, 2FW400, 4usb rear, 2usb 1 on each side, and 2 network Connections
    The cavity of the Computer may have to be a bit deeper. And there would only be FCPX, Compressor, Motion, Garage Band (much better than even Pro editors realize) and no other programs exept the essential ones.
    Now I know some will say, well thats what the MacPro was for! But I have to tell you I love the monitor on my iMac and with 4 FW connections you can use this system for mulit cam shoots and edit on the fly!
    Let me know what you think and what you would add or not add for that matter.

    Yes.  But I suggest you go look at one, if possible, at a local Apple retailer.  There are two basic MacBook Pro models: 13" and 15".  I would go with the latter if you plan to use it as your basic work station.  An Apple retailer can help you with the needed adaptor and cable to connect to your projection system.
    Having been a college teacher for many years, I've used Mac portables as an integral part of my classroom including use with small table-top projectors as well as connecting into auditorium hall projection systems.  I've used Mac portables from the first G3 model to the Titanium PowerBooks (I retired before the switch to Intel.)

  • Buying a MacBook - A few questions from Windows user

    I've worked in the IT industry since DOS and Windows 1 appeared. Built my first 8Mhz PC from scratch, and generally followed the path of the "Dark Side" for most of my computing life, without any reason for change. Until last year...
    While my job dictates that I must understand and support Microsoft environments, I'm finding at home OSX may suit my needs better than Vista for my day-to-day laptop.
    At home I have a couple of PC's (XPMCE and Vista Home Premium) holding media (which stream to PSP's and XBox 360's etc.), a wireless and wired network, a network printer. I'm running Vista 64U on my main PC (running is a loose term for Vista), and use an IBM laptop running Vista 32U for day-to-day surfing, photo editing, media playing and document writing.
    (phew - intro over!)
    I'm thinking of buying a 2.2GHz MacBook (1GB/120GB/SuperDrive) to replace my laptop but have a few worries (apart from the obvious interface familiarity).
    - Spec says the Intel graphics is 144Mb shared. In a Windows world shared RAM is a bad thing. Should I be thinking of upping the ram to 2Gb if I want to use things like Photoshop for image editing? Or should I be considering a MBP?
    - Media playback - As I use an XBox 360 as a media extender - will the MB handle my primarily MS based media files, and stream them from my servers? I notice VideoLAN is on OSX, which is what I use on my PC's.
    - No work and all play - what Office suite replacements are recommended? I notice Open Office is available for OSX, is it as good as it's Windows counterpart?
    Advice, opinions etc. all appreciated. I'm heading over to the 101 documents to brush up on my Mac lingo.
    Horness

    Greetings!
    As you said, the graphics shares ram. And yes, that is not the best. You should definetly think about upgrading to 2GB of ram, especially if you are going to be running Parallels or Photoshop. I have 2GB in my macbook, and while running Parallels, I can max it out. OS X uses the extra ram nicely, and even in normal usage I usually have about 1.25 filled. So, go for 2GB. With ram prices nowdays, you can get a 2x1GB set off of newegg.com and pay less than Apple's prices.
    The Macbook vs. Macbook Pro debate is always going to exist. I find my macbook to be enough, but if you're looking into gaming even the tiniest amount, it isn't going to suffice. For Photoshop, you shouldn't have any problems with a macbook, as long as you have enough Ram.
    About media playback: I'm not that familiar with what you're talking about, however, OS X can read NTFS, so you can access any shared files over the network.
    About Openoffice: I use Neooffice, which is a modified Openoffice. As far as I know, it's as good as the windows counterpart.
    Have fun with your new toy when you buy it!

  • Question from end user

    Hello
    I am running a video editng program that uses Java for its media logger. On previous installs everything worked fine.
    Now when running the app, i receive the error message ...
    java.lang.RuntimeException:
    java.lang.illegalstateException:
    Wrong db schema version.
    DB = 4707 current 4560
    Please run update utility.
    My video must have java v 1.4. I have tried v13 of 1.4 but no luck. Going to newer Java SE prevents the app from running.
    From where can I download an update utility? I don't know what to look for.
    Running winXP sp2.
    thanks for any help

    Hi
    thank you for the replies !!!!!
    It turns out to be an application error in the database which has to be cleared/reset with a utility from the software vendor.
    This was a clean install of the app. I have installed it several times before without this problem.
    thank you for taking the time to help me out !!!!!!

  • Few questions from new user of Macs

    iSight: I gather that is a built in camera on the iMAc?  Why does it have this special name, rather than just "Camera"  On my iphone I have a "Camera" not an "iSight"  What is the difference?

    iSight used to be an external thing you buy for your Mac. I have one actually. They made it internal and kept the name. It had a name because the idea of a camera in your computer used to be new until HP and others copied it.

  • Is there a way to have two fields hidden from the user but active for the person receiving the form?

    I have an order form where there are two fields that the original form filler does not fill out. The person who finally receives and processes the completed form needs to fill in those two fields. I'm not sure how to handle this. Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    MDawn

    My suggestion is a folder level script, that controls the visibility of form objects.
    Only if this script is installed the fields will be visible.
    You need three things for this.
    1. The folder level script that has to be installed in the javascript folder of Acrobat or Reader:
    var ShowMeAll = app.trustedFunction(function(doc)
         app.beginPriv();
         var ShowMe = this.xfa.form.Form1.Master.ShowAllContent;
         ShowMe.rawValue = "Yes";
         app.endPriv();
    2. A hidden textfield in the form (on the masterpage for example).
    Let's say you name it "ShowAllContent".
    Put this script into it's docReady:Event.
    try
         event.target.ShowMeAll(event.target);
    catch(e)
         this.rawValue = "No";
    3. A script in the layoutReady:event of the subforms or form fields you like to show/hide depending on the presence of the folder level script.
    if (xfa.form.Form1.Master.ShowAllContent.rawValue == "Yes")
         this.presence = "visible";
    else
         this.presence = "hidden";

Maybe you are looking for