Question on Contract Manager Adminstrator roles

I have a question on IT roles around contract manager. What do people typically see as far as contract manager IT administrator roles ?
We are deploying contract manager to a user base of about 500 users and perhaps 100 concurrent users (eventually). Right now we have a small production deployment for 3-4 construction projects.
We are trying to figure out how to structure the contract manager admin role. One idea we have is to establish a 1st level of support, provisioning users and possibly setting up new projects. I could be involved in a 2nd level of support, dealing with more infrastructure problems, such as defining new security templates, configuring document attachment storage, troubleshooting problems with the server or with letters. We’d structure it this way so that the day-to-day work of dealing with users would fall to the 1st level of support and the more backend problems would fall to me. I have some other projects I’m involved in so the day-to-day dealing with CM users would not be as much of a burden on me.
My boss is concerned about clear cut roles. If his group is responsible for an enterprise system (contract manager) then only members of his team (me) have the power to do things like modify the configuration of CM, start/stop the server, reboot the machine. Other IT team members, not a member of his team (1st level support person) could have admin privileges to deal with user/project provisioning only. 1st level support person wouldn’t have full administrator privileges. Is this technically possible? Does the security model of CM support such a division of labor?
What else have people seen that works as far as roles? Is having just one person take on both user/project provisioning and the rest of the admin tasks doable? If a single person is managing contract manager, is this a part-time load or a full-time load? Recall that I’m slated to be involved in other projects such as UCM in general, I/PM (Oracle Imaging and Process Management), possibly some integration projects too.
Are there any guidelines for best practices around admin roles?
If anyone has any experience/opinions on Primavera P6 roles I’d like to hear about them also.

Yes, the arrangement you describe with you being the 2nd level support (server level functions) and another person being 1st level (user admin, etc) is certainly technically possible. You would have full admin rights to the server on which CM resides, and the 1st level person would only require access to the CM Admin web-based interface through an ID and password. From what you describe, that person would not need physical access to the server at all in order to handle the user account management.
Now, based on the number of users which you descibe, it really sounds like a full time job for at least two people. These numbers will vary based on how much the CM app will be customized and integrated with other systems. Beyond the IT support you describe, there will be a need to have "super-user" level users that can handle the application level requests such as how do I add a new contact, what value do I put in that field, etc.
Although it's becoming more common, 500 users is still a large implementation in the PCM world. I've seen organizations with up to 10 IT type people involved with implementations of that scale, but maybe not all full time.
Rick

Similar Messages

  • Contract Management in Classic Scenario

    Hi All,
    I have a question around contract management in SRM when using the classic scenario.
    Is it possible to utilise the global outline agreement functionality in SRM with the classic scenario and then distrbiute the contracts to the backend thus making use of the intrageted sourcing options in SRM and using cFolders for supplier colbaooration?
    When the contracts are genarted in ECC are these then available as sources of supply in SRM by assiging the contract number to a vendor list?
    And once final question, is the price info from the backend contract that is assigned in the evndor list passed into the shopping cart item data when the contract is assigned as the source of supply?
    Cheers
    Chris

    Hi Dinesh,
    thanks for the respone, this definately helps with the question of using Global Outline Agreements with the classic scenario.
    There is still one question outstanding though and that is
    If a backend contract is assigned in a vendor list is the contract price taken into account when the source of supply is assigned?
    Cheers
    Chris
    Edited by: Chris March on Jul 15, 2008 9:33 AM

  • Direct Posting to Contracts and Business roles in SRM

    Hi guys,
    We have SRM 7 and ECC 6.0.
    Please consider the following business scenario:
    Invoice creation in SRM against ERP contract that has been previously replicated to SRM;
    No PO or GR involved in this process;
    Possibility to have one contract to vendor A, and the corresponding invoices for different vendors.
    Considering this we thought about the following solution:
    Activate Direct Posting to Contracts functionality in ERP;
    Contract, supplier and materials / services replication to SRM, through PI;
    Allow different partners in the contract, using partner role “Invoicing party” (RS), so that it would be possible to post an invoice to vendor B, with reference to a contract with vendor A.
    Questions:
    Reporting – as far as I know it’s only possible to run analyses for vendors, which in our case would be vendor A, assigned to the contract.  However, we will need to have information about the invoices posted to the other business partners that are assigned to that contract. Do you have any idea if there is any standard approach for this?
    Contract and business roles replication to SRM – does the contract and the assigned business roles could be replicated to SRM or is it required any specific customizing in SRM for this to be possible?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    AN

    Hi,
    For direct posting to G/L in  MIRO, follow the path:
    SPRO > Materials Management > Logistics Invoice Verification > Incoming Invoice > Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts > Here Activate "Dir.posting to G/L acct = active" and save.
    MIRO - It will show additional Tab as "GL Account" along with "Reference"
    For more check the links:
    http://www.saptechies.com/transaction-mr1m-direct-posting-to-gl-account/
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/17887583/MM-FI-Account-Determination
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Customizing Master Contract Management - SAP Banking 6.0

    Hello,
    i am customizing the Master Contract Management in Banking 6.0 - especially the Effective Cash Pooling Feature.
    On defining the restriction rules i have a problem:
    How do i define the methods and the rule-id's for Cash Pooling.
    Where is the connection between the methods and the rule-id's ?
    The SAP documentation is very unclear in this special topic.
    Tnx
    Sebastian

    Francesco Martire wrote:
    > - install EHP4 without installing any Java stack
    Yes, it is, as informed above;
    > - activate (for example) HCM_TMC_CI_1, HCM_TM_ANALYTICS_1, HCM_OSA_CI_1 and CA_HAP_CI_1
    They're ABAP, right? So, YES, you can activate them;
    > - customizing Performance Management though its transactions
    This is mostly an application question, so you need to refer to their documentation or on their forum;
    > - use BAPIs and BADIs from custom presentation logic
    Same as above;
    > ...or is some business logic affected by not installing Java and EP?
    From a technical point of view, there's no interdependency between ABAP <-> Java regarding the functionality of the system. This means in you can install/uninstall (or have/don't have) them apart that each components/transactions will work w/o problems. However, you should check with Application about potentially limitations/problems on this matter.
    I hope this information clarifies.
    Best regards,
    Tomas  Black

  • Uninstall and Reinstall Secondary Site Management Point Role

    Dear Brothers,
    I have an issue with one of my SCCM 2012 Sp1 with CU3 Secondary Site Server which the client failed to install on the actual server due to a client issue observed in the CCMSetup.log.
    Observation Regarding the issue:
    Issue Detail No1.
    SCCM Client is not installing to my Secondary Site Server with site code (XYZ), after all the site server are also clients in SCCM hierarchy so it self needs SCCM Client as well. 
    CCMSetup.log:
    "Error 25150. Setup was unable to register the CCM_Service_HostingConfiguration endpoint" when you try to install the client agent in Configuration Manager"
    According to http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2905359
    the solution is to :
    1. Uninstall the management point role. 
    2. Reinstall the client agent on the management point computer. 
    3. Reinstall the management point role.
    Issue Detail No 2.
    When I am trying to uninstall the Management Point Role via SCCM Console as part of the solution posted on the above KB Article, unfortunately the delete or uninstall option is been greyed out.
    Now a lot of discussion on the topic "Can not remove management point role is greyed out "under this thread
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/1a039893-4a65-4dc9-9feb-e6f09ea1fc0b/can-not-remove-management-point-remove-role-is-greyd-out?forum=configmanagerdeployment
    However on the last comment of the above thread from"Trana010"
    stated a tool or a command
    C:\program files\Microsoft Configuration Manager\bin\x64\rolesetup.exe /deinstall /siteserver:(sec server name) SMSMP
    0
    Which I never tried yet, and also cannot find a reliable KB supporting the command "rolesetup.exe".
    Questions:
    1. What is the best way to uninstall/Reinstall the management point on secondary site considering the above issue details?
    2. Should I installed CU4 directly instead? Maybe it will resolved the issue even though it is not related to the current case
    Regards,

    Well, it's by design that you can't remove a management point on a secondary site, so I can imagine that that's why there is nothing "official" written on that subject. I think there are three things you can do:
    Try to run the command line (which is probably unsupported)
    Submit a CSS call
    Upgrade to CU4 and assume the problem is gone.
    My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
    Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude
    Dear Peter,
    I end up shooting a case with CSS, he guided me and share that this issue is very common.
    The reason is that it requires CU3 upgrade (Configmgr2012ac-sp1-kb2882125-x64.msp) to be installed with the SCCM Client installation (The same time) via command line in an elevated permission.
    Follow the solution provided by Microsoft Support:
    CCMSetup.exe /forceinstall SMSSITECODE=XYZ CCMENABLELOGGING=TRUE CCMLOGLEVEL=0 PATCH=C:\Configmgr2012ac-sp1-kb2882125-x64.msp
    It seems the Client Push provided by SCCM 2012 Sp1 Infra, that includes your Hotfix under the "Hotfix" folder under the client source folder somehow doesn't work with this issue, that's why the work around is to help the ccmsetup to grab the Hotfix with
    by providing the path for the hotfix instead of relying to take the hotfix for the hotfix folder.
    Overall peter thanks for your suggestion. And also to Mr. Jason Sandys opening the option for an R2 upgrade, I will look into the KB for this to plan for implementation. 
    Regards,

  • Contract Management for CCM 1.0 items ? (Not in backend)

    Hi guys,
    I would like to enable Contract Management (Local & Global) in my SRM 4.0 sp8 environment.    However, 90% of the catalog items in CCM (4,000 articles aprox) do not exist in the backend.   
    My very simple question is: Should I create all this 4000 items in the backend in order to enable contract management in SRM ?
    Thanks for your valuable help guys !
    BR.
    Diego

    Hello Shantanu Joshi
    Your business scenario is standart MDM functionality
    More about how it works you can read from:
    MDM overview
    and standart help links (see scenarios part):
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_mdm550/helpdata/en/43/D7AED5058201B4E10000000A11466F/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwmdm71/helpdata/en/43/D7AED5058201B4E10000000A11466F/frameset.htm
    Regards
    Kanstantsin

  • Central Contract Management

    Dear SAP Experts,
    I have a few questions regarding our implementation of SRM and ECC.
    FYI, we are planning to use SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.05 as backend.
    We’re planning to utilize Central Contract Management functionality in SRM, where we negotiate the price in SRM then we distribute the contract to ECC. In ECC we create PR, which have reference to this contract (contract number in SRM is different with ECC). So this PR will have assigned source of supply, is it possible for us then to create PO automatically from tcode ME59? The reason we ask this because we see in documentation that every PO in ECC created with reference to contact in SRM, ECC will need to check first the current price in the SRM contract, so we would like to confirm whether it is working if we use ME59 (we plan to use ME59 as background job and unfortunately we don’t have the testing system yet to verify this).
    We’re planning to have PR created in ECC. However we would like to utilize MDM catalog as well. Is it possible that during PR creation we can select items from the catalog?
    We’re planning to have implement SRM 7.01 in 2 waves. In first wave we will only use Self Service Procurement and Strategic Sourcing (using classic deployment where the leading PO is in ECC). However in the second wave, we’re planning to implement SUS (Supplier Collaboration). In SUS, we would like to activate the business function, so the vendor will response RFx and participate in auction from SUS itself. The question is…is it possible for us to have it planned like this? For example, in first wave, the RFx and auction will use SRM server itself, however in the second wave, we will switch it to SUS. Our concern is that the switch will happen to the productive server already. Is this okay?
    Thanks
    Varian

    Hi,
    When you distribute the central contract to ECC system, it creates a new contract in ECC system.
    When you create PR, you can assign this contract as source of supply.
    Then automatic PO creation if your settings for automatic PO is maintained.
    In ECC 6.04 also catalog integration is possible. So for your version 6.05 there is absolutely no problem. The same OCI interface parameters have to be maintained in MM system for catalog.
    Your two stage implementation is absolutely possible.
    With Regards,
    Malay

  • SRM one client Contract Management

    Dear Experts,
    Can we create contracts in SRM one client and distribute them to our ECC system.
    Because I seached on service marketplace and no where its mentioned that Contract mangement is possible in SRM one client.
    Sourcing is possible that I have checked the functionality. Please reply
    Thanks
    Ankit Jain

    Hi Ivy,
    Yes Correct nothing mentioned in the configuration guide or any other  document.
    But I checked System nodes no where I found that contract management is possible in SRM one client.
    Also Note 963000 doesn't say anything about it.
    Below link also says its not possible so I am confused even Roles doesn't have Contract Menu
    SRM 7.0 one client setup in comparison to SRM 7... | SCN
    Regards
    Ankit Jain

  • Local Contract management (PCTR)

    Hi Friend,
    Business scenario: Extended Classic Scenario (ECS)
    We planning to implement local contract management (PCTR) in SRM7.0 and also contract should available to requester to create SC and after Purchase order gets created.
    Could you please tell us the configuration and technical details.
    Appreciate your valuable inputs.
    Thank You!
    Shrini

    Hi,
    Just to remind; as you are impelementing Local Contract Management;  contracts you will create, will not be updated in ECC. 
    You can create contract using puchaser log in. Assign role u2018operational purchaseru2019 to the purchaser.
    You will see contract (material) in Source of Supply of SC.
    Regards,
    yaniVy
    reward if helps

  • Contracts Management 3rd Party Software

    Good afternoon,
    I have been asked to implement a Contracts Management solution using SharePoint 2010. I am by no means a professional and I feel this is beyond my abilities. I created a custom list with expiry date. Also it lists the contracts ending in 60days and ending
    in 120days. There will be roughly 500 contracts uploaded to the custom list/library. I have since been asked to have the contracts sorted within groups (not folders) I am not sure how to do that. A SharePoint Designer workflow is needed to alert someone when
    the contract is up for renewal. I have read all the threads and Google info regarding that step and I can not get it to work.
    Is there a 3rd party Contracts Management software out there that can be used via SharePoint? I have a feeling my simple solution will not be good enough as I am sure they will need files archiving and more functionality down the road.
    Thank you.

    To group the items in the list is really easy once you know how. Let's say you have a choice field called 'market area' which might be Public, Education, Finance etc.
    You can then create a 'view' in the list that groups the items by that column.
    http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/sharepoint-server-help/create-modify-or-delete-a-view-HA010377693.aspx
    There's a dozen ways to do the notification emails bit. The simplest, and best, is to create a 'Policy' in the list for that document.
    This is an example of someone doing what you wanted (and asking for a bit more which is trickier)
    http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/83019/email-group-when-documents-reaches-expiry-date
    There's going to be a million 3rd party tools that can work with SharePoint to greater or lesser degrees. If you really want to determine what to go for you'll need to do a full requirement capture exercise to identify exactly what the system needs to do.
    One of SharePoint's strengths that is often underrated is that it's highly flexible compared to most software at that scale.

  • Architecture question regarding record management

    We are designing a contract management system in SharePoint 2013. The contracts are separated by departments and by locations. Users in a particular department/location should only have access to contracts in their own department/location.
    We are thinking to create 1 site collection for each department - this ensures that we stay within the 200 GB content database recommendation. In each department site collection, we will have 1 document library with 1 folder for each location - permission inheritance
    is broken on each folder to restrict access on a location basis. We thought of 1 document library so that we can use out-of-box SharePoint views for reports across locations for executives to see.
    The problem with this design is that there are about 250 different locations. This means, in each department site collection, we will have to create 250 folders in our document library and break inheritance on the 250 folders.
    Another approach would be to give no one access to the document library & use a custom drop off library form to add documents. We can create a web part which elevates permissions and displays only those documents that users are supposed to see. The advantage
    with this approach is much less broken permission inheritance. The disadvantage is that we won't be able to use OOTB views and we'll have to implement our own search.
    Thoughts appreciated!

    You could consider "Audience Targeting". It works well with the Content Query WebPart. You can enable it on one document library and it provides a TargetAudience column allowing you to assign groups/roles to the content. This could get around the
    creation of separate site collections and breaking permission inheritance.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc261958(v=office.14).aspx#Section4
    Blog | SharePoint Field Notes Dev Tools |
    SPFastDeploy | SPRemoteAPIExplorer

  • Issue in creating dev plan in talent management specialist role

    Hi ,
    I am facing issue in creating development plan through talent management specialist role . Actually in one system I have 2 location one is india & another one is USA . its working for india but when I search india employee its show no employee found . can you please guide me
    Tarun

    Hi Luke ,
    According to one of your article , I run  HRALXSYNC in r/3 , in that all indian employee are green but USA employee in RED . I found following error , can you please guide me that what is mean by that ?
    The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_INFOTYPE=============CM003 line 117
    Qualification 90007487 does not exist
    The incorrect HR object has the key 01NA90011026
    The incorrect infotype record is 40601NA900110265105    1  1900010199991231
    The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_QUALIFICATION========CM001 line 69
    Serious error; see log
    The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_CANDIDATE_INFOTYPE_BLCM00B line 99
    Serious error; see log
    The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_INFOTYPE=============CM003 line 117
    Qualification 90007487 does not exist
    The incorrect HR object has the key 01NA90011026
    The incorrect infotype record is 40601NA900110265105    1  1900010199991231
    The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_QUALIFICATION========CM001 line 69
    Serious error; see log
    The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_CANDIDATE_INFOTYPE_BLCM00B line 99
    Thanks
    Tarun

  • Two questions about Risk Management 2.0

    hi experts,
    Please find below two questions about Risk Management:
    -In SPRO, Risk Management>Create top node: after completing information and executing I have this error:
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "/ORM/ORM_CREATE_TOP_NODES" had to be terminated
    because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    The following syntax error occurred in program "/ORM/SAPLORM_API_SERVICES " in
    include "/ORM/LORM_API_SERVICESU10 " in
    line 97:
    "Bei PERFORM bzw. CALL FUNCTION "GET_ORGUNIT_THRESHOLDS" ist der Aktual"
    "parameter "I_ORGUNIT_ID" zum Formalparameter "IV_ORGUNIT_ID" inkompati"
    "bel."
    The include has been created and last changed by:
    Created by: "SAP "
    Last changed by: "SAP "
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "/ORM/ORM_CREATE_TOP_NODES" had to be terminated
    because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    Do you know where it could come from?
    -On the Portal>Risk Management
    when I click in a link under the risk management menu(activities and risks, risk report, document risk,...) i alway have an internal server error:
    While processing the current request, an exception occured which could not be handled by the application or the framework.
    If the information contained on this page doesn't help you to find and correct the cause of the problem, please contact your system administrator. To facilitate analysis of the problem, keep a copy of this error page. Hint: Most browsers allow to select all content, copy it and then paste it into an empty document (e.g. email or simple text file).
    Do we have to set up some customizing points before accessing these links?
    Thank you !
    Regards,
    Julien

    Hi Julien ,
    I have the same error what u described as :-
    -On the Portal>Risk Management
    when I click in a link under the risk management menu(activities and risks, risk report, document risk,...) i alway have an internal server error:
    While processing the current request, an exception occured which could not be handled by the application or the framework.
    If the information contained on this page doesn't help you to find and correct the cause of the problem, please contact your system administrator. To facilitate analysis of the problem, keep a copy of this error page. Hint: Most browsers allow to select all content, copy it and then paste it into an empty document (e.g. email or simple text file).
    Do we have to set up some customizing points before accessing these links?    "
    Are you able to solve this. Please let me know how to resolve this???
    Thanks
    Regards,
    Atul

  • Central Contract Management in case of Classic Scenario

    Hi,
    At our current implementation, requirement is to implement both Service procurement(with hierarchy) and Central Conract Management. I was exploring the possibility of utilizing Central Contract Management with Classic scenario.
    Will the Central Contracts created in this fashion be available in Sourcing Cockpit for the buyer to select against Purchase Requisitions? Will the Central Contract be visible at all in SRM in this case ?
    Please respond only with reference to Classic scenario.
    Thanks,
    Abhilash

    Yes the Central Contract will be available in the Sourcing Cockpit, both local and classic scenario's. Yes the Central Contracts will be available for the creation of Purchase Requisitions in R/3 and to assign SOS in R/3.
    Do know that for SRM 7.0 PI is required for setting up Central Contracts. This is promised to change with the release of EHP1 for SRM (due june 2010).
    Kind regards,
    Tim

  • "Error reading credit master data"  in contract management in CRM 7.0

    Hi All,
    In CRM 2007,whenever we navigate to contract management screen,error message come which is "Error reading credit master data "
    Any suggestion on how to solve this issue.
    Regrads
    Nikhil

    Hi All,
    This is resolved.
    Just set the  entry in the table CRMV_CREDIT_GEN to 'Do not Display credit master data '
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for