Questiong in using a model class
I'm pretty new with the MVC design pattern. When using the model class, I don't know what is the more advantages of using the model class instead of using an application class.
Moreover, in my application, there are two pages. One is used for searching screen, and the other is used for displaying a result. I try to use the model class to receive all input parameters passed by the view. Everything is fine. After users clicks a search button, a search controller will call the subcontroller which displays a result. At this point, I cannot figure out the best place where calling subcontroller should be. Right now, I put it in the do_request method; nevertheless, I have to detect the search event in this do_request method, as well. In my view, it seems strange! Are there any other solutions or examples matching my problem.
MVC design pattern is to seperate out different logic. and at the same time keeping them as a seperate entity so that they can be used multiple times(reusability) in different controllers or so.
yes it is posible to implement the same using application class. like we can make 1 class for mode(business logic) and one for control(class 2) and now make our application class which will inherit these two. this way it will work fine. but in this yet we are seperating the business and control logic but we are not able to make the act as a seperate entity. the objects of their type will be live via application class throughout the application.
and if we make them as a different class instead of inheriting them in application class, and instatiate them whenever require, then that is MVC, that is what we are doing. we are just bypassing application class since we can directly use class of controller type(super class CL_BSP_CONTROLLER).
there is no such heirarchy type layering in MVC, these are like three different objects and we are making them communicate to each other so that functionality of each can be seperate out.
hope this clears your doubt.
there is a application like you are looking for:
check it:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/12/1eeeb4245d1f4f96c989519261b0f6/frameset.htm
it is in sap as : bsp application : TUTORIAL_4_MVC
it has a controller for searhing search.do
hope this helps,
regards,
Hemendra
Similar Messages
-
RE: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes
Hi all,
if you add the following to your spider2jato.xml
It will automatically map your CSpDataObject.executeImmediate to use
ExecuteImmediateUtil.executeImmediateSelect with the arguments mapped as
well.
Kostas
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpDataObject[.\s]*executeImmediate[\s]*\(([^,]*),([^)]*)\)]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpDataObject[.\s]*executeImmediate[\s]*\(([^,]*),([^)]*)\)]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[ExecuteImmediateUtil.executeImmediateSelect($1,$2,
getRequestContext())]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Stevens
Cc: vnamboori@y...
Sent: 11/29/01 11:23 AM
Subject: RE: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes
Namburi,
I have included an example in the file ExecuteImmediateUtil.java
The Yahoo Group will not handle the attached file we will put it in the
Files section shortly.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: vnamboori@y... [mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=081071113213093190112061186248100253094145066046167121181">vnamboori@y...</a>]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:29 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes
Matt,
For CSpSelect.executeImmediate() I have an example of custom helpermethod as a replacement which uses JDBC results instead of
CSpDBResult.
Can you send me this example.
Thanks
Namburi
--- In iPlanet-JATO@y..., "Matthew Stevens" <matthew.stevens@E...>
wrote:
Namburi,
I will post a document to the group site this evening which has thedetails
on various tactics of migrating these type of utilities.Essentially, you
either need to convert these utilities to Models themselves or keepthe
utilities as is and simply use the
RequestManager.getRequestContext.getModelManager().getModel()
to statically access Models.
For CSpSelect.executeImmediate() I have an example of custom helpermethod
as a replacement whicch uses JDBC results instead of CSpDBResult.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: vnamboori@y... [mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=081071113213093190112061186248100208071048">vnamboori@y...</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Hi All,
In the present ND project we have lots of utility classes. These
classes in diffrent directory. Not part of nd pages.
In these classes we access the dataobjects and do the
manipulations.
So we access dataobjects directly like
CSpider.getDataObject("do....");
and then execute it.
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion for these
utilities we have to do manually.
My question is Can we access the the models in the post migration
sameway or do we need requestContext?
We have lots of utility classes which are DataObject intensive.Can
someone suggest a better way to migrate this kind of code.
Thanks
Namburi
[email protected]
For more information about JATO, please visit:
http://developer.iplanet.com/tech/appserver/framework/index.jsp
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
For more information about JATO, please visit:
http://developer.iplanet.com/tech/appserver/framework/index.jsp
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Hi all,
if you add the following to your spider2jato.xml
It will automatically map your CSpDataObject.executeImmediate to use
ExecuteImmediateUtil.executeImmediateSelect with the arguments mapped as
well.
Kostas
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpDataObject[.\s]*executeImmediate[\s]*\(([^,]*),([^)]*)\)]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpDataObject[.\s]*executeImmediate[\s]*\(([^,]*),([^)]*)\)]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[ExecuteImmediateUtil.executeImmediateSelect($1,$2,
getRequestContext())]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Stevens
Cc: vnamboori@y...
Sent: 11/29/01 11:23 AM
Subject: RE: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes
Namburi,
I have included an example in the file ExecuteImmediateUtil.java
The Yahoo Group will not handle the attached file we will put it in the
Files section shortly.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: vnamboori@y... [mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=081071113213093190112061186248100253094145066046167121181">vnamboori@y...</a>]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:29 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes
Matt,
For CSpSelect.executeImmediate() I have an example of custom helpermethod as a replacement which uses JDBC results instead of
CSpDBResult.
Can you send me this example.
Thanks
Namburi
--- In iPlanet-JATO@y..., "Matthew Stevens" <matthew.stevens@E...>
wrote:
Namburi,
I will post a document to the group site this evening which has thedetails
on various tactics of migrating these type of utilities.Essentially, you
either need to convert these utilities to Models themselves or keepthe
utilities as is and simply use the
RequestManager.getRequestContext.getModelManager().getModel()
to statically access Models.
For CSpSelect.executeImmediate() I have an example of custom helpermethod
as a replacement whicch uses JDBC results instead of CSpDBResult.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: vnamboori@y... [mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=081071113213093190112061186248100208071048">vnamboori@y...</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Hi All,
In the present ND project we have lots of utility classes. These
classes in diffrent directory. Not part of nd pages.
In these classes we access the dataobjects and do the
manipulations.
So we access dataobjects directly like
CSpider.getDataObject("do....");
and then execute it.
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion for these
utilities we have to do manually.
My question is Can we access the the models in the post migration
sameway or do we need requestContext?
We have lots of utility classes which are DataObject intensive.Can
someone suggest a better way to migrate this kind of code.
Thanks
Namburi
[email protected]
For more information about JATO, please visit:
http://developer.iplanet.com/tech/appserver/framework/index.jsp
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
For more information about JATO, please visit:
http://developer.iplanet.com/tech/appserver/framework/index.jsp
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -
Namburi,
When you said you used the Reg Exp tool, did you use it only as
preconfigured by the iMT migrate application wizard?
Because the default configuration of the regular expression tool will only
target the files in your ND project directories. If you wish to target
classes outside of the normal directory scope, you have to either modify the
"Source Directory" property OR create another instance of the regular
expression tool. See the "Tool" menu in the iMT to create additional tool
instances which can each be configured to target different sets of files
using different sets of rules.
Usually, I utilize 3 different sets of rules files on a given migration:
spider2jato.xml
these are the generic conversion rules (but includes the optimized rules for
ViewBean and Model based code, i.e. these rules do not utilize the
RequestManager since it is not needed for code running inside the ViewBean
or Model classes)
I run these rules against all files.
See the file download section of this forum for periodic updates to these
rules.
nonProjectFileRules.xml
these include rules that add the necessary
RequestManager.getRequestContext(). etc prefixes to many of the common
calls.
I run these rules against user module and any other classes that do not are
not ModuleServlet, ContainerView, or Model classes.
appXRules.xml
these rules include application specific changes that I discover while
working on the project. A common thing here is changing import statements
(since the migration tool moves ND project code into different jato
packaging structure, you sometime need to adjust imports in non-project
classes that previously imported ND project specific packages)
So you see, you are not limited to one set of rules at all. Just be careful
to keep track of your backups (the regexp tool provides several options in
its Expert Properties related to back up strategies).
----- Original Message -----
From: <vnamboori@y...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 6:08 AM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes - Pease don't
forget about the regular expression potential
Thanks Matt, Mike, Todd
This is a great input for our migration. Though we used the existing
Regular Expression Mapping tool, we did not change this to meet our
own needs as mentioned by Mike.
We would certainly incorporate this to ease our migration.
Namburi
--- In iPlanet-JATO@y..., "Todd Fast" <toddwork@c...> wrote:
All--
Great response. By the way, the Regular Expression Tool uses thePerl5 RE
syntax as implemented by Apache OROMatcher. If you're doing lotsof these
sorts of migration changes manually, you should definitely buy theO'Reilly
book "Mastering Regular Expressions" and generate some rules toautomate the
conversion. Although they are definitely confusing at first,regular
expressions are fairly easy to understand with some documentation,and are
superbly effective at tackling this kind of migration task.
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Frisino" <Michael.Frisino@S...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes -Pease don't
forget about the regular expression potential
Also, (and Matt's document may mention this)
Please bear in mind that this statement is not totally correct:
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion for
these
utilities we have to do manually.Remember, the iMT is a SUITE of tools. There is the extractiontool, and
the translation tool, and the regular expression tool, and severalother
smaller tools (like the jar and compilation tools). It is correctto state
that the extraction and translation tools only significantlyconvert the
primary ND project objects (the pages, the data objects, and theproject
classes). The extraction and translation tools do minimumtranslation of the
User Module objects (i.e. they repackage the user module classes inthe new
jato module packages). It is correct that for all other utilityclasses
which are not formally part of the ND project, the extraction and
translation tools do not perform any migration.
However, the regular expression tool can "migrate" any arbitrary
file
(utility classes etc) to the degree that the regular expressionrules
correlate to the code present in the arbitrary file. So first andforemost,
if you have alot of spider code in your non-project classes youshould
consider using the regular expression tool and if warranted adding
additional rules to reduce the amount of manual adjustments thatneed to be
made. I can stress this enough. We can even help you write theregular
expression rules if you simply identify the code pattern you wish to
convert. Just because there is not already a regular expressionrule to
match your need does not mean it can't be written. We have notnearly
exhausted the possibilities.
For example if you say, we need to convert
CSpider.getDataObject("X");
To
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(XModel.class);
Maybe we or somebody else in the list can help write that regularexpression if it has not already been written. For instance in thelast
updated spider2jato.xml file there is already aCSpider.getCommonPage("X")
rule:
<!--getPage to getViewBean-->
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getPage[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getPage[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[getViewBean($1ViewBean.class]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
Following this example a getDataObject to getModel would look
like this:
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getDataObject[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getDataObject[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[getModel($1Model.class]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
In fact, one migration developer already wrote that rule andsubmitted it
for inclusion in the basic set. I will post another upgrade to thebasic
regular expression rule set, look for a "file uploaded" posting.Also,
please consider contributing any additional generic rules that youhave
written for inclusion in the basic set.
Please not, that in some cases (Utility classes in particular)
the rule
application may be more effective as TWO sequention rules ratherthan one
monolithic rule. Again using the example above, it will convert
CSpider.getDataObject("Foo");
To
getModel(FooModel.class);
Now that is the most effective conversion for that code if that
code is in
a page or data object class file. But if that code is in a Utilityclass you
really want:
>
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(FooModel.class
So to go from
getModel(FooModel.class);
To
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(FooModel.class
You would apply a second rule AND you would ONLY run this rule
against
your utility classes so that you would not otherwise affect yourViewBean
and Model classes which are completely fine with the simplegetModel call.
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[getModel\(]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[getModel\(]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
A similer rule can be applied to getSession and other CSpider APIcalls.
For instance here is the rule for converting getSession calls toleverage
the RequestManager.
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[getSession\(\)\.]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[getSession\(\)\.]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[RequestManager.getSession().]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Stevens" <matthew.stevens@e...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:56 PM
Subject: RE: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Namburi,
I will post a document to the group site this evening which has
the
details
on various tactics of migrating these type of utilities.
Essentially,
you
either need to convert these utilities to Models themselves or
keep the
utilities as is and simply use the
RequestManager.getRequestContext.getModelManager().getModel()
to statically access Models.
For CSpSelect.executeImmediate() I have an example of customhelper
method
as a replacement whicch uses JDBC results instead of
CSpDBResult.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: vnamboori@y... [mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=081071113213093190112061186248100208071048">vnamboori@y...</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Hi All,
In the present ND project we have lots of utility classes.
These
classes in diffrent directory. Not part of nd pages.
In these classes we access the dataobjects and do themanipulations.
So we access dataobjects directly like
CSpider.getDataObject("do....");
and then execute it.
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion forthese
utilities we have to do manually.
My question is Can we access the the models in the postmigration
sameway or do we need requestContext?
We have lots of utility classes which are DataObjectintensive. Can
someone suggest a better way to migrate this kind of code.
Thanks
Namburi
[email protected]
[email protected]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected]
[email protected]Namburi,
When you said you used the Reg Exp tool, did you use it only as
preconfigured by the iMT migrate application wizard?
Because the default configuration of the regular expression tool will only
target the files in your ND project directories. If you wish to target
classes outside of the normal directory scope, you have to either modify the
"Source Directory" property OR create another instance of the regular
expression tool. See the "Tool" menu in the iMT to create additional tool
instances which can each be configured to target different sets of files
using different sets of rules.
Usually, I utilize 3 different sets of rules files on a given migration:
spider2jato.xml
these are the generic conversion rules (but includes the optimized rules for
ViewBean and Model based code, i.e. these rules do not utilize the
RequestManager since it is not needed for code running inside the ViewBean
or Model classes)
I run these rules against all files.
See the file download section of this forum for periodic updates to these
rules.
nonProjectFileRules.xml
these include rules that add the necessary
RequestManager.getRequestContext(). etc prefixes to many of the common
calls.
I run these rules against user module and any other classes that do not are
not ModuleServlet, ContainerView, or Model classes.
appXRules.xml
these rules include application specific changes that I discover while
working on the project. A common thing here is changing import statements
(since the migration tool moves ND project code into different jato
packaging structure, you sometime need to adjust imports in non-project
classes that previously imported ND project specific packages)
So you see, you are not limited to one set of rules at all. Just be careful
to keep track of your backups (the regexp tool provides several options in
its Expert Properties related to back up strategies).
----- Original Message -----
From: <vnamboori@y...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 6:08 AM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes - Pease don't
forget about the regular expression potential
Thanks Matt, Mike, Todd
This is a great input for our migration. Though we used the existing
Regular Expression Mapping tool, we did not change this to meet our
own needs as mentioned by Mike.
We would certainly incorporate this to ease our migration.
Namburi
--- In iPlanet-JATO@y..., "Todd Fast" <toddwork@c...> wrote:
All--
Great response. By the way, the Regular Expression Tool uses thePerl5 RE
syntax as implemented by Apache OROMatcher. If you're doing lotsof these
sorts of migration changes manually, you should definitely buy theO'Reilly
book "Mastering Regular Expressions" and generate some rules toautomate the
conversion. Although they are definitely confusing at first,regular
expressions are fairly easy to understand with some documentation,and are
superbly effective at tackling this kind of migration task.
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Frisino" <Michael.Frisino@S...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes -Pease don't
forget about the regular expression potential
Also, (and Matt's document may mention this)
Please bear in mind that this statement is not totally correct:
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion for
these
utilities we have to do manually.Remember, the iMT is a SUITE of tools. There is the extractiontool, and
the translation tool, and the regular expression tool, and severalother
smaller tools (like the jar and compilation tools). It is correctto state
that the extraction and translation tools only significantlyconvert the
primary ND project objects (the pages, the data objects, and theproject
classes). The extraction and translation tools do minimumtranslation of the
User Module objects (i.e. they repackage the user module classes inthe new
jato module packages). It is correct that for all other utilityclasses
which are not formally part of the ND project, the extraction and
translation tools do not perform any migration.
However, the regular expression tool can "migrate" any arbitrary
file
(utility classes etc) to the degree that the regular expressionrules
correlate to the code present in the arbitrary file. So first andforemost,
if you have alot of spider code in your non-project classes youshould
consider using the regular expression tool and if warranted adding
additional rules to reduce the amount of manual adjustments thatneed to be
made. I can stress this enough. We can even help you write theregular
expression rules if you simply identify the code pattern you wish to
convert. Just because there is not already a regular expressionrule to
match your need does not mean it can't be written. We have notnearly
exhausted the possibilities.
For example if you say, we need to convert
CSpider.getDataObject("X");
To
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(XModel.class);
Maybe we or somebody else in the list can help write that regularexpression if it has not already been written. For instance in thelast
updated spider2jato.xml file there is already aCSpider.getCommonPage("X")
rule:
<!--getPage to getViewBean-->
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getPage[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getPage[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[getViewBean($1ViewBean.class]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
Following this example a getDataObject to getModel would look
like this:
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getDataObject[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getDataObject[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[getModel($1Model.class]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
In fact, one migration developer already wrote that rule andsubmitted it
for inclusion in the basic set. I will post another upgrade to thebasic
regular expression rule set, look for a "file uploaded" posting.Also,
please consider contributing any additional generic rules that youhave
written for inclusion in the basic set.
Please not, that in some cases (Utility classes in particular)
the rule
application may be more effective as TWO sequention rules ratherthan one
monolithic rule. Again using the example above, it will convert
CSpider.getDataObject("Foo");
To
getModel(FooModel.class);
Now that is the most effective conversion for that code if that
code is in
a page or data object class file. But if that code is in a Utilityclass you
really want:
>
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(FooModel.class
So to go from
getModel(FooModel.class);
To
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(FooModel.class
You would apply a second rule AND you would ONLY run this rule
against
your utility classes so that you would not otherwise affect yourViewBean
and Model classes which are completely fine with the simplegetModel call.
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[getModel\(]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[getModel\(]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
A similer rule can be applied to getSession and other CSpider APIcalls.
For instance here is the rule for converting getSession calls toleverage
the RequestManager.
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[getSession\(\)\.]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[getSession\(\)\.]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[RequestManager.getSession().]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Stevens" <matthew.stevens@e...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:56 PM
Subject: RE: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Namburi,
I will post a document to the group site this evening which has
the
details
on various tactics of migrating these type of utilities.
Essentially,
you
either need to convert these utilities to Models themselves or
keep the
utilities as is and simply use the
RequestManager.getRequestContext.getModelManager().getModel()
to statically access Models.
For CSpSelect.executeImmediate() I have an example of customhelper
method
as a replacement whicch uses JDBC results instead of
CSpDBResult.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: vnamboori@y... [mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=081071113213093190112061186248100208071048">vnamboori@y...</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Hi All,
In the present ND project we have lots of utility classes.
These
classes in diffrent directory. Not part of nd pages.
In these classes we access the dataobjects and do themanipulations.
So we access dataobjects directly like
CSpider.getDataObject("do....");
and then execute it.
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion forthese
utilities we have to do manually.
My question is Can we access the the models in the postmigration
sameway or do we need requestContext?
We have lots of utility classes which are DataObjectintensive. Can
someone suggest a better way to migrate this kind of code.
Thanks
Namburi
[email protected]
[email protected]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected]
[email protected] -
Re: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Hi Matt,
Sounds like some of the stuff we need to migrate has a lot in common with
Namburi's project.
I would be very keen to get hold of a copy of the 'tactic' document you
mention below, as well as the sample code you mention to replace CspDBResult
stuff with JDBC results.
Thanks in advance,
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: Matthew Stevens <matthew.stevens@E...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:56 AM
Subject: RE: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Namburi,
I will post a document to the group site this evening which has thedetails
on various tactics of migrating these type of utilities. Essentially, you
either need to convert these utilities to Models themselves or keep the
utilities as is and simply use the
RequestManager.getRequestContext.getModelManager().getModel()
to statically access Models.
For CSpSelect.executeImmediate() I have an example of custom helper method
as a replacement whicch uses JDBC results instead of CSpDBResult.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: vnamboori@y... [mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=081071113213093190112061186248100253094145066046167121181">vnamboori@y...</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Hi All,
In the present ND project we have lots of utility classes. These
classes in diffrent directory. Not part of nd pages.
In these classes we access the dataobjects and do the manipulations.
So we access dataobjects directly like
CSpider.getDataObject("do....");
and then execute it.
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion for these
utilities we have to do manually.
My question is Can we access the the models in the post migration
sameway or do we need requestContext?
We have lots of utility classes which are DataObject intensive. Can
someone suggest a better way to migrate this kind of code.
Thanks
Namburi
[email protected]
[email protected]Hi Matt,
Sounds like some of the stuff we need to migrate has a lot in common with
Namburi's project.
I would be very keen to get hold of a copy of the 'tactic' document you
mention below, as well as the sample code you mention to replace CspDBResult
stuff with JDBC results.
Thanks in advance,
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: Matthew Stevens <matthew.stevens@E...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:56 AM
Subject: RE: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Namburi,
I will post a document to the group site this evening which has thedetails
on various tactics of migrating these type of utilities. Essentially, you
either need to convert these utilities to Models themselves or keep the
utilities as is and simply use the
RequestManager.getRequestContext.getModelManager().getModel()
to statically access Models.
For CSpSelect.executeImmediate() I have an example of custom helper method
as a replacement whicch uses JDBC results instead of CSpDBResult.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: vnamboori@y... [mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=081071113213093190112061186248100253094145066046167121181">vnamboori@y...</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Hi All,
In the present ND project we have lots of utility classes. These
classes in diffrent directory. Not part of nd pages.
In these classes we access the dataobjects and do the manipulations.
So we access dataobjects directly like
CSpider.getDataObject("do....");
and then execute it.
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion for these
utilities we have to do manually.
My question is Can we access the the models in the post migration
sameway or do we need requestContext?
We have lots of utility classes which are DataObject intensive. Can
someone suggest a better way to migrate this kind of code.
Thanks
Namburi
[email protected]
[email protected] -
Self Reference Model Class - How to populate using Entity Framework
Hi,i have table in SQL Server named Employees as follows:
EmployeeId lastName FirstName reportsTo
1 Davolio Nancy 2
2 Fuller Andrew NULL
3 Leverling Janet 2
4 Peacock Margaret 2
5 Buchanan Steven 2
6 Suyama Michael 5
7 King Robert 5
8 Callahan Laura 2
9 Dodsworth Anne 5
I would like to use Entity Framework to populate my Model Class .My model class looks as follows:
public class Employees
readonly List<Employees> _children = new List<Employees>();
public IList<Employees> Children
get { return _children; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName {get; set;}
I want to use this class in ViewModel to populate my TreeView control. Can anyone help me in order to define Linq to Entities in order to populate my model class Employees from table in SQL Server as defined. Thanks in advance.
AlmirHello Fred,
unfortunately it does not work, maybe I can be more specific about what I'm trying to get. I'm following Josh Smith's article on CodeProject related to WFP TreeView
Josh Smith article. He has Class named Person with the following structure
public class Person
readonly List<Person> _children = new List<Person>();
public List<Person> Children
get
return _children;
public string Name { get; set; }
The same is populated from Database class using method named GetFamilyTree() which look as follows:
public static Person GetFamilyTree()
// In a real app this method would access a database.
return new Person
Name = "David Weatherbeam",
Children =
new Person
Name="Alberto Weatherbeam",
Children=
new Person
Name="Zena Hairmonger",
Children=
new Person
Name="Sarah Applifunk",
new Person
Name="Jenny van Machoqueen",
Children=
new Person
Name="Nick van Machoqueen",
new Person
Name="Matilda Porcupinicus",
new Person
Name="Bronco van Machoqueen",
new Person
Name="Komrade Winkleford",
Children=
new Person
Name="Maurice Winkleford",
Children=
new Person
Name="Divinity W. Llamafoot",
new Person
Name="Komrade Winkleford, Jr.",
Children=
new Person
Name="Saratoga Z. Crankentoe",
new Person
Name="Excaliber Winkleford",
I'm trying to figure out how should I write
GetFamilyTree() method using Entity Framework in order to connect to my SQL Server database and populate this Person class as it was populated manually in Joshs Example. The table I'm using in SQL Server is described in
my first post named Employees (it's self reference table) -
Using the Model Facade Pattern in a Java EE 5 Web application
Hi,
Yutaka and I did a Tech tip
http://java.sun.com/mailers/techtips/enterprise/2006/TechTips_Nov06.html#2 on using a model facade pattern in Java EE 5 web-only applications recently. We got some questions about it, and these were some of the questions raised...
Question 1) the first part of the tech tip(it has two articles in it) http://java.sun.com/mailers/techtips/enterprise/2006/TechTips_Nov06.html showed how to access Java Persistence objects directly from a JSF managed bean, is this a good practice?
Question 2) when to use a facade(as mentioned in the second part of tech tip) ?
and maybe
Question 3) why doesn't the platform make this easier and provide the facade for you?
Briefly, I will take a shot at answering these three questions
Answer 1) You can access Java persistence directly from your managed beans, but as your application grows and you start to add more JSF managed beans or other web components(servlets, JSP pages etc) that also directly access Java Persistence objects, you will start to see that you are cutting/pasting similiar code to handle the transactions and to handle the Java Persistence EntityManager and other APIs in many places. So for larger applications, it is a good practice to introduce a model facade to centralize code and encapsulate teh details of the domain model management
Answer 2) IAs mentioned in answer 1, its good to use a model facade when your application starts to grow. For simple cases a spearate model facade class may not be needed and having managed beans do some of the work is a fast way to jumpstart you application development. But a facade can help keep the code clean and easier to maintain as the aplication grows.
Answer 3) First note that both of the articles in the tech tip were about pure web apps(not using any EJBs) and running on the Java EE5 platform. Yes it would be nice if a facility like this was made available for web-only applications(those not using EJBs). But for web-only applications you will need to use a hand-rolled facade as we outlined in the tech tip. The Java EE platform does provide a way to make implementing a facde easier though, and the solution for that is to use a Session Bean. This solution does require that you use ythe EJB container and have a Session Bean facade to access your Java Persistence objects and manage the transactions. The EJB Session Facade can do a lot of the work for you and you dont have to write code to manage the transactions or manage the EntityManager. This solution was not covered in this tech tip article but is covered in the Java BluePrints Solutions Catalog for Perssitence at
https://blueprints.dev.java.net/bpcatalog/ee5/persistence/facade.html in the section "Strategy 2: Using a Session Bean Facade" . Maybe we can cover that in a future tech tip.
Please ask anymore questions about the tech tip topic on this forum and we will try to answer.
hth,
SeanHi Sean,
I'm working on an implementation of the Model Facade pattern where you can possibly have many facades designed as services. Each service extends a basic POJO class which I'm calling CRUDService: its short code is provided below for your convenience.
The CRUDService class is meant to generalize CRUD operations regardless of the type of the object being used. So the service can be called as follows, for example:
Job flightAtt = new Job();
SERVICE.create(flightAtt);
Runway r = (Runway) SERVICE.read(Runway.class, 2);
Employee e = (Employee) SERVICE.read(Employee.class, 4);
SERVICE.update(e);
SERVICE.delete(r);SERVICE is a Singleton, the only instance of some service class extending CRUDService. Such a class will always include other methods encapsulating named queries, so the client won't need to know anything about the persistence layer.
Please notice that, in this scenario, DAOs aren't needed anymore as their role is now distributed among CRUDService and its subclasses.
My questions, then:
. Do you see any obvious pitfalls in what I've just described?
. Do you think traditional DAOs should still be used under JPA?
. It seems to me the Model Facade pattern isn't widely used because such a role can be fulfilled by frameworks like Spring... Would you agree?
Thanks so much,
Cristina Belderrain
Sao Paulo, Brazil
public class CRUDService {
protected static final Logger LOGGER = Logger.
getLogger(Logger.GLOBAL_LOGGER_NAME);
protected EntityManager em;
protected EntityTransaction tx;
private enum TransactionType { CREATE, UPDATE, DELETE };
protected CRUDService(String persistenceUnit) {
em = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory(persistenceUnit).
createEntityManager();
tx = em.getTransaction();
public boolean create(Object obj) {
return execTransaction(obj, TransactionType.CREATE);
public Object read(Class type, Object id) {
return em.find(type, id);
public boolean update(Object obj) {
return execTransaction(obj, TransactionType.UPDATE);
public boolean delete(Object obj) {
return execTransaction(obj, TransactionType.DELETE);
private boolean execTransaction(Object obj, TransactionType txType) {
try {
tx.begin();
if (txType.equals(TransactionType.CREATE))
em.persist(obj);
else if (txType.equals(TransactionType.UPDATE))
em.merge(obj);
else if (txType.equals(TransactionType.DELETE))
em.remove(obj);
tx.commit();
} finally {
if (tx.isActive()) {
LOGGER.severe(txType + " FAILED: ROLLING BACK!");
tx.rollback();
return false;
} else {
LOGGER.info(txType + " SUCCESSFUL.");
return true;
} -
Can you use two tax classes in the same payroll run?
Hi,
I have a wage type that is currently set to Tax Class 1 (fully taxed) for processing class 71, I need to change it to tax class 7 (Withholding and SUI only) and have it computed as part of the regular payroll run and also by itself using offcycle.
When I have it set as Tax Class 1, all is well, when I change it to tax class 7, I get the error...
BSI Messages and Status 4101 CAN NOT PROCESS DUPLICATE RESIDENT STATE FED
This is the first time we're using this tax class and I think i have it set up correctly in the tax model but am not for sure.
Any suggestions? I'd really appreciate some guidance as I've looked
Thanks!
Stephanie AbrahamsonI think you should not change the PRCL 71 from 1 to 7 wide open. Start it with begin date of pay period you want and keep the history with PRCL 71 1.
As well check the config of tax model.
Arti -
Error while creating model classes, operation aborted in NWDS
Hi All,
When i select Adaptive rfc 2 model and then search for the RFC, when i select RFC and click on next i get an error while importing :
Error while creating model classes, operation aborted.
It is working fine in visual composer and i have activated function module, RFC but getting same error. It is also working in web service navigator also.
Can any one help me out??
Regards,
Pradeep kumar
Edited by: pradeep_546 on Feb 17, 2011 9:35 PM
Edited by: pradeep_546 on Feb 17, 2011 9:36 PM
Edited by: pradeep_546 on Feb 17, 2011 9:37 PMHai guys thanks for reply
Tushar,
I am using NWDS 7.2, ce7.2 server, ECC 6.0.
Amit,
I have tested the JCO destinations they are working fine and i created a new pair of JCO destinations but unable to import the Adaptive RFC2 Model gives same error but Adaptive webservices are working fine in my NWDS7.2
Deepak,
I am unable to create model in other projects also.
I have sufficient amount of memory in my drive.
I have imported the DC to other NWDS but it gives same error.
Thanks for all,
Regards,
Pradeep Kumar G
Edited by: pradeep_546 on Feb 18, 2011 3:05 PM -
How to implement custom Model Class in Oracle ADF?
I am using Oracle ADF for one of my project and i am using Query component of ADF. For given tables the query component creates view objects and maps the relations. ADF uses its own custom model class for this component and it should understand the DB tables. But for my project i have no access to database. All i can do is pass a string or object/query to the existing (custom) Java class/object, and this model class formulates query and queries the database and returns the value to my Java class. I have to display these results using ADF to the front end. Is There a way to achieve this? Can i replace/override the existing Model class of ADF. If so how?
Thanks in advance for your help.Hi, there:
Best thing to do is to start with the default login.html page, and then modify it. The login screen is fairly complex and it's easy to just miss a JS function you need to call. To get to default page, you would need to do one deploy (to simulator or whatever), and then look for login.html page in the temporary Xcode or Android project generated from the deployment. It should be under the "deploy" directory in your JDev workspace.
You can also see all the framework JS files and CSS files that way as well.
We have had customers implementing custom login screen so we know it can work, but they all had to start with the default login screen and then modify it.
Thanks,
Joe Huang -
Problem in using AWS model for PI interface
Hi
We want to consume XI inbound interface for a 3rd party web service in web dynpro via AWS model; we can create the model class from the wsdl file imported from PI interface; but facing some issue in configuring the logical destination as we don't have any wsdl url from PI which we can use in the dynamic proxy configuration.
Thanks in advance.
SudipHi Sudip
Can you please tell me how did you resolve this issue? We are running into the exact same problem.
Thanks
Preet -
Flex with any ORM - Writing Model classes and action scripts redundant?
Hi,
I am using Hibernate with Flex. I have all my model classes
as POJOs. Now if i have to access these POJOs directly from flex, I
need to write action script reference classes for all my POJO model
classes. Since mapping POJOs with action script reference classes
is so mechanical, i am wondering if there is any tool to read all
the properties from the POJO's and convert them to action script
reference classes automatically. Is there any way that this can be
automated?
Thanks in advance.
Chandu.If you use Granite Data Services, there's something called
"gas3" (I think is the name). You may be able to use it even if you
don't use Granite.
I didn't care for learning how to use it (plus it uses
Groovy, more needless stuff to learn I guess), so I can't say how
well it works. I just wanted a simple custom ant task that
generates ActionScript classes for my Java classes. So I ended up
making my own. It's definitely not trivial but it's not that hard
if you're very good with Java and reflection. -
Unable to use bean model in a Callable Object
Hello,
I'm trying to use a bean model in a callable object but at runtime I'm allways getting null pointer exception.
If I test it in a WebDynpro application everything goes right (I only have to add a sharing reference to my EJB Application). But if I Implement a Callable Object and I try to use a EJB bean model it doesn't works.
(I have added the sharing reference in the callable object DC)
I have made somes test and the command bean class never finds the EJB using home interface.
At the moment I would like to use a bean model instead Web Service model because of testing propouses.
Please, Do you know If I'm missing something? Do I have to add more reference or use DC?
Is possible to use bean models in Callable Objects?
Thanks in advance,
RegardsHi,
Not sure if it will work.
Try creating the view object with a single query, and once after creating it, edit the view object, and change the SQL query in the source.
Something like
<SQLQuery>
<![CDATA[select * from emp]]>
</SQLQuery>to
<SQLQuery>
<![CDATA[select * from emp where deptno=10 union all select * from emp where deptno=20]]>
</SQLQuery>-Arun
P.S : I am able to create the view object with union declaratively in JDev 11g. Probably you can upgrade to 11g ;) . -
MVC Problem with getter method of table attribute in model class
Hi,
I am on 620 SP34. I am writing a bsp application with mvc. One of the model classes has an attribute of type table. I use this attribute in a htmlb-tableview and '//MODEL/ZMY_TAB' for data binding. If I try to activate a getter method for this attribute, the application dumps with exception <i>BSP exception: Structure component with name "ZMY_TAB" does not exist</i>. I find the SAP source, that raising this exception (see below). The source code looks like: <i>"I don't support getter methods for tables in attribute path"</i>! The setter method works fine, so I am at a loss. Has anyone of you wrote a getter method for an table attribute in bsp-mvc? Have I to consider anything special?
Thanks,
Carsten
Main Program CL_BSP_MODEL==================CP
Source code of CL_BSP_MODEL==================CM00Z
METHOD IF_BSP_MODEL_BINDING~GET_ATTRIBUTE_DATA_REF
* check if attribute exists for binding!
if exists_attribute( l_name ) is initial.
return.
endif.
* setter or getter defined? Not supported for DATA REF requests
if get_getter( attribute_name = l_name ) is not initial.
raise exception type cx_bsp_inv_component
exporting name = l_name.
endif.You have two options:
1. Make your attributes public. It should work fine.
2. If you need to process the attribute values before it is used, you can make the attribute private but will need three methods
GET_T_ZMY_TAB that returns the table
SET_T_ZMY_TAB that sets the values
GET_M_T_ZMY_TAB that returns DDIC information about the attribute. The same holds good for structures(Change to GET_S_ and GET_M_S_ ) and simple attributes(Change to GET_ and GET_M_).
The set and get methods are kind of documented at http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/fb/fbb84c20df274aa52a0b0833769057/content.htm but there is no mention of the GET_M_ methods. I could not find one single document on the Model part MVC.
Once I added the GET_M_XYZ methods to my attributes, my BSPs started to work fine.
Cheers
Sreekanth -
Model class deleting in Web Dynpro
Hi ,
I want to delete few model classes which I imported from RFC which are redundant. Is there any way I can delete these classes.
From the ABAP end also few RFCs have been deleted and now I am getting error at the Web Dynpro end.
Your reply greatly appreciated.
Regards,
RakeshHi,
Delete the model node from the custom controller which is bound to the RFC node during the mapping. and also delete the methods created in custom controller to call the execution of RFC. then remove the model from the used models area. Reimport the model and do the mapping steps.
regards
karthik -
INVALID CLASS:model_cmd_bean as model class already exists.
Hello all,
I am gettin the following error:INVALID CLASS:model_cmd_bean as model class already exists. while creating a java bean Model.
but this is the 1st time i m using these wraper class and cmd class for creating a model.
Sugest what shoul i do?Hi,
Welcome to SDN Community
Check these forum links,
Import JavaBean Error : Invalid Class
invalid class - ..as Model Class already exist
Hope this helps.
Regards
Srinivasan T
Maybe you are looking for
-
According to the apple support website, I have to document my panic kernel in Apple Discussions (a lot of information). I hope to get an answer. *Documenting the problem: partitioning and formatting partition hard drive MacBook for use of Windows (Bo
-
Table containing Program Texts(Text Symbols, SelectionTexts, List Heading)
Hi All, I would like to know which is the standard SAP std. table which stores the data regarding Text Symbols, SelectionTexts, and List Heading of every program we create. There should definitly be a table where it is stored (otherwise we w
-
When away/offline status will be solved
Hello! I would like to appeal on Microsoft seriousness and ask for serious answers! When this problem will be solved? There are hundreds posts in different forums here and no body from Microsoft answering. Problems with statuses persists about one ye
-
Reading all search result entries before sending a client
I tired reading the entries in the pre and post search ops - SLAPI_PLUGIN_POST_SEARCH_FN SLAPI_PLUGIN_PRE_SEARCH_FN I got NENTRIES=0 (even though numerous were being returned). With the SLAPI_PLUGIN_PRE_ENTRY_FN the plugin is called each time an entr
-
Clean-installation of Leopard having issues with OD but upgrading not
The server is a 10.4.11 with open directory, dns and AFP that it was working fine with 20 iMac (10.4.11) for long time, we are considering to update the clients to Leopard, the big problem is coming to connect with the OD, if I upgraded a tiger imac