R12 - Accounts Payable & PO Accrual Reconciliation Report - write offs

Hi,
As a relative novice to Oracle I need some help.................
My question regards the above which is essentially a "goods received not invoiced" report.
I have a number of items on the report which I would like to write off for two reasons:
(1) I have a small balance left which is basically the difference between the PO and the accounts payable column - in the region of 1p to 5p (therfore a housekeeping exercise)
(2) Items that we've never received an invoice for (we've received the stock for free!). ie there is only an entry in the PO column of the report.
For the above I would like a method of writing off these balances from the report.* This should therefore create a credit in my P&L account.
Your thoughts please.
Thanks in advance.
Jon

This is the forum for the SQL Developer tool. You need to ask your question in an eBusiness suite forum.

Similar Messages

R12 Accounts Payable Trial balance is reporting incorrectly (urgent)

the trial balance is reporting penny amounts on invoices that are fully paid how do I correct this issue

Follow the below steps and Run the Trial Blance and let me know if it helps.
Thanks
Girish
How to Rebuild Trial Balance Data (repopulate XLA_TRIAL_BALANCES)
1. Navigate: Payables Responsibility > Setup > Accounting Setups > Subledger Accounting Setups > Open Account Balances Listing Definitions
2. Query up your Report Definition: select Defined By = Accounting Flexfield or Segment (whichever applies in your case), click “Go”
3. Click on Update icon in the "Actions" column – the definition's update page opens.
4. "Touch" the definition by simply clicking "Apply" button (without making any change).
This should start the “Open Account Balances Data Manager” concurrent processes

R12: How to filter AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report based on GL Date

Hi,
Anybody know how to filter AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report based on GL Date from and GL Date to in R12?
Since we just upgraded from 11.5.10 to 12.1.3 and found we cannot filter those report for specific date. It shown all data included the old data from 8 years ago also.
We need to run the report only for specific date only. Please share with me if anyone know about this.
Thanks.

In 12 you can rebuild and run the report for a particular period, but not a single day if that's what's required

PO issue (Accrual Reconciliation Report )

Hi,
when run the accrual reconciliation report for PO,I find the quantity *Unit price is not equal Amount when A/P Receipt Match,the details as follows:
when find the original PO line ,find that the PO line's status is cancelled ,the price have changed from 6 to 45 , from 10 to 50 before cancelled this PO lines, how can do now let them equal ?
and check the invoice for this po ,
20081022     1     Bar     20     6     120.00
CH0000059 1     Bar     -20     6     (120.00)
20081022     2     Bar     20 10     200.00
CH0000059 2 Bar     -20 10 (200.00)
CHSZ-Compart Hi-Precision Tech                         Accrual Reconciliation Report                          Report Date:      02-12-2008 20:00
Account:     24.00000.317010.0000.0000.000
PO Number     Item+      Transaction     Src     Org      Date     Document Number     Line      Unit     Quantity      Unit Price      Amount      Variance      Balance
Vendor Name:     ： ShenzhenBaoan
240803218     Pdtn consumables     Receive     PO     CHS     2008-10-29     30509262     1     Bar     -20     6     (120.00)          (120.00)
     Pdtn consumables     Return to Supplier     PO     CHS     2008-11-5     30509262     1     Bar     20     6     120.00           120.00
     Pdtn consumables     A/P Receipt Match      AP     CHS     2008-10-29     20081022     1     Bar     *20     45     120.00           120.00*
     Pdtn consumables     A/P Receipt Match      AP     CHS     2008-11-5     CH0000059     1     Bar     -20     45     (900.00)          (900.00)
     Pdtn consumables     Receive     PO     CHS     2008-10-29     30509262     2     Bar     -20     10     (200.00)          (200.00)
     Pdtn consumables     Return to Supplier     PO     CHS     2008-11-5     30509262     2     Bar     20     10     200.00           200.00
     Pdtn consumables     A/P Receipt Match      AP     CHS     2008-10-29     20081022     2     Bar     *20*     *50*     *200.00*           *200.00*
Pdtn consumables     A/P Receipt Match      AP     CHS     2008-11-5     CH0000059     2     Bar     -20     50     (1,000.00)          (1,000.00)
                              Vendor          Subtotal               (1,580.00)     0     (1,580.00)
                                                       ---------------- -     ---------------     ----------------     GL
                                   Account Subtotal:                     (67,550.27)     0     (67,550.27)     (67,550.27)
                                   Report Total:                     (67,460.15)     -90     (67,550.15)
                                                       ================ =     ===============     ================
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 10:56 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 10:57 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 10:58 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 10:59 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 11:00 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 11:07 PM

have anybody can give advise ?
Edited by: user638343 on Jan 8, 2009 10:24 PM

Closed PO's on Accrual Reconciliation Report

We are getting issue of Closed PO's coming in Accrual Reconciliation Report.
I am not that familier with this report & it's functionality. So need help on this.
Please let me know if I can provide more information on this. Like if you want to see the Report O/p/.
Thanks
Sachin Ahuja

Hi Raghav,
Documents mentioned certainly helped me a lot in having more knowledge on Accrual Reconciliation. However i need to go in depth on one of the document.
I further checked on my issue & looks amount being accounted on Purchaing is different than Amount being accounted in AP. & Difference I can see is in PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP_ALL.TRANSACTION_UNIT_PRICE value is different when Innvoice is created.
Can someone point how it's being calculated or why there is mismatch. As per user they simply match the PO on Invoice & have not done anything else. Then why Transaction_Unit_Price got changed.
Please suggest.
Thanks
Sachin Ahuja

Po Accrual Reconciliation report

Hi Sir
Hope you are doing well and good.
I am new to R12 PO. For my client in 11.5.10.2 they have customized Po Accrual Reconciliation report. I came to know that in R11 they use view:PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP and temporary table used in that view is PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP_ALL.
Now we are migrating this report to R12 and the above view was obsolete synonym in R12.
1) After checking thoroughly i came to that temporary table was replaced with CST_AP_PO_RECONCILIATION & CST_RECONCILIATION_SUMMARY in R12. And i am unable to found view:PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP replacement in R12. Can you please help me in this regard.
2) Using the two new tables:CST_AP_PO_
RECONCILIATION & CST_RECONCILIATION_SUMMARY, can we modify the query to get the same output as like R11
This is very very urgent request.
Best Regards
Mani

This is the forum for the SQL Developer tool. You need to ask your question in an eBusiness suite forum.

SRKIM: R12: Accounts Payable Trial Balance issue troubleshoot

Purpose
R12 에서 AP Trial Balance Report 확인 시 데이터가 비정상적일 경우 check 해야 하는 내용에 대해 확인 해 보도록 한다.
Question
R12 에서 invoice 생성 후 gl 로 transfer 하였으나 ap trial balance report 의 데이터가 비정상적인 것으로 확인 된다.
어떤 내용을 확인 해야 하는가.
Answer
1. APList Diagnostics Script 을 해당 invoice 에 대해 수행 하여 아래의 내용을 확인한다.
- Accounting 이 생성되어 gl로 모두 transfer 되었는지 여부.
- Accounting Date 가 Trial Balance Report 의 start date 와 as of date 안에 포함 되는지 여부
2.위의 내용에 문제가 없다면 아래 sql 로 데이터를 확인 해 보도록 한다.
select *
from xla_trial_balances
where source_entity_id in (
select entity_id
from xla.xla_transaction_entities xte
where application_id = 200
and (
(entity_code = 'AP_INVOICES' and source_id_int_1 in (&invoice_id))
OR
applied_to_entity_id in (
select entity_id
from xla.xla_transaction_entities xte
where application_id = 200
and (
(entity_code = 'AP_INVOICES' and source_id_int_1 in (&invoice_id))
3.GL 에 실제 해당 데이터가 존재 하는지 아래 sql 로 확인 해 보도록 한다.
SELECT distinct aeh.*
FROM gl_je_lines gjl, GL_IMPORT_REFERENCES gir, gl_je_headers gjh, GL_JE_BATCHES gjb, XLA_AE_LINES
ael,
XLA_AE_HEADERS aeh, XLA_EVENTS aea, xla.xla_transaction_entities xte
WHERE ael.gl_sl_link_id = gir.gl_sl_link_id
and gjh.je_batch_id= gjb.je_batch_id
and gjl.je_header_id = gjh.je_header_id
and gjl.je_header_id = gir.je_header_id
and gjl.je_line_num = gir.je_line_num
AND gir.gl_sl_link_table in ('XLAJEL')
and ael.gl_sl_link_table in ('XLAJEL')
AND aea.application_id = 200
AND aea.event_id = aeh.event_id
AND aeh.ae_header_id = ael.ae_header_id
AND gjb.je_batch_id = gir.je_batch_id
and xte.application_id = 200
and xte.entity_id = aea.entity_id
and gjh.je_header_id = gir.je_header_id
and gjh.je_source = 'Payables'
and (
(xte.entity_code = 'AP_PAYMENTS' and xte.source_id_int_1 = &check_id)
OR
(xte.entity_code = 'AP_INVOICES' and xte.source_id_int_1 = &invoice_id)
SELECT distinct gjl.*
FROM gl_je_lines gjl, GL_IMPORT_REFERENCES gir, gl_je_headers gjh, GL_JE_BATCHES gjb, XLA_AE_LINES
ael,
XLA_AE_HEADERS aeh, XLA_EVENTS aea, xla.xla_transaction_entities xte
WHERE ael.gl_sl_link_id = gir.gl_sl_link_id
and gjh.je_batch_id= gjb.je_batch_id
and gjl.je_header_id = gjh.je_header_id
and gjl.je_header_id = gir.je_header_id
and gjl.je_line_num = gir.je_line_num
AND gir.gl_sl_link_table in ('XLAJEL')
and ael.gl_sl_link_table in ('XLAJEL')
AND aea.application_id = 200
AND aea.event_id = aeh.event_id
AND aeh.ae_header_id = ael.ae_header_id
AND gjb.je_batch_id = gir.je_batch_id
and xte.application_id = 200
and xte.entity_id = aea.entity_id
and gjh.je_header_id = gir.je_header_id
and gjh.je_source = 'Payables'
and (
(xte.entity_code = 'AP_PAYMENTS' and xte.source_id_int_1 = &check_id)
OR
(xte.entity_code = 'AP_INVOICES' and xte.source_id_int_1 = &invoice_id)
4.위의 sql 을 통해 Trial Balance Table 의 데이타가 잘 못 생성 되었음이 확인 되면 해당 Trial balance table 의 데이타를 recreate 하는 작업을 수행 해야 한다.
Reference
Note. 553484.1 - THE R12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TRIAL BALANCE DATA IS
INCORRECT/WRONG

Follow the below steps and Run the Trial Blance and let me know if it helps.
Thanks
Girish
How to Rebuild Trial Balance Data (repopulate XLA_TRIAL_BALANCES)
1. Navigate: Payables Responsibility > Setup > Accounting Setups > Subledger Accounting Setups > Open Account Balances Listing Definitions
2. Query up your Report Definition: select Defined By = Accounting Flexfield or Segment (whichever applies in your case), click “Go”
3. Click on Update icon in the "Actions" column – the definition's update page opens.
4. "Touch" the definition by simply clicking "Apply" button (without making any change).
This should start the “Open Account Balances Data Manager” concurrent processes

Purchasing Accrual Reconciliation Report

Hi all,
DO anyone know why the report with no data. could be the parameters or setting ? We wish to generate the report by weekly basis.. instead of month
Attach is the sample report.
Thanks
Lee
Accrual Reconciliation Report Report Date: 13-MAY-2011 09:36
UNMATCHED RECEIPTS
Report Parameters
Sort By : Vendor
Rebuild Report Information : No
GL Dates From : 01-MAY-11
To : 12-MAY-11
Items From :
To :
Vendors From : A & A
To : Zuzana Voerman
Include All Transactions : Yes
Include Written Off Transactions : No
Aging Number of Days :
Accrual Account :
ABC USD Entities Accrual Reconciliation Report Report Date: 13-MAY-2011 09:36
Sort By Vendor UNMATCHED RECEIPTS Page: 1
From 01-MAY-11 To 12-MAY-11 (USD)
Malaysia LE/OU
***** No Data Found *****
Edited by: SGLEE on May 13, 2011 3:05 AM

check this forum thread :
Accrual Reconcilliation Report
/S.P DASH

Replica of Accrual Reconciliation Report

Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement in which I have to make a query which will give an exact replica of what output will be obtained from "Accrual Reconciliation Report" without using temporary table po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all. At the end of the day it should match the report output for the transaction dates passed (i.e. GL date From/To). I made a little query but still the output from my query is not matching to the output what I obtained from the report. Firstly, my question is: Is it possible to have a /make a sql query which will be exact replica of output of the report and if we can achieve this acc to u, what all things/conditions I have to take care while making this sql. I will really appreciate for any kind of help or feedback.
Many Thanks,
Sumir Chawla

Hi Nagamohan,
Here is my script, please check and let me know if I missed some conditions:
SELECT RT.TRANSACTION_ID
,(SELECT DISTINCT RH.SEGMENT1
FROM APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES RL
,APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS RH
WHERE PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID = RL.LINE_LOCATION_ID (+)
AND RL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = RH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID(+)
AND ROWNUM = 1) "PR_NUMBER"
,(SELECT DISTINCT E2.FULL_NAME
FROM APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES RL
,APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS RH
,APPS.HR_EMPLOYEES E2
WHERE PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID = RL.LINE_LOCATION_ID (+)
AND RL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = RH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID(+)
AND RH.PREPARER_ID = E2.EMPLOYEE_ID(+)
AND ROWNUM = 1) "PR_PREPARER"
,PHA.TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE "PO TYPE"
,V.VENDOR_NAME "VENDOR_NAME"
,TO_CHAR(PHA.CREATION_DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') "PO_CREATION_DATE"
,E1.FULL_NAME "PO_BUYER"
,CC.SEGMENT1||'-'||CC.SEGMENT2||'-'||CC.SEGMENT3||'-'||CC.SEGMENT4||'-'||CC.SEGMENT5||'-'||CC.SEGMENT6||'-'||CC.SEGMENT7||'-'||CC.SEGMENT8 "ACCOUNT"
,PHA.SEGMENT1 "PO_NUMBER"
,NULL "RELEASE_NUMBER"
,PLA.LINE_NUM "LINE_NUMBER"
,MSI.SEGMENT2 "ITEM_NUMBER"
,MSI.PRIMARY_UNIT_OF_MEASURE "UOM"
,MSI.DESCRIPTION "ITEM_DESCRIPTION"
,PLL.QUANTITY
,PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED
,PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED
,RCV.JE_SOURCE_NAME "TRANSACTION_SOURCE"
,'RECEIPT' "DOCUMENT TYPE"
,RSH.RECEIPT_NUM "DOCUMENT NUMBER"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') "DOCUMENT DATE"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'YYYY') "DOCUMENT DATE (YEAR)"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'MON') "DOCUMENT DATE (MONTH)"
,RCV.CURRENCY_CODE "CURRENCY_CODE"
,RT.PO_UNIT_PRICE*NVL(RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_RATE,1) "UNIT_PRICE_(SGD)"
,RT.QUANTITY "TRANSACTION_QUANTITY"
,NVL(RCV.ACCOUNTED_DR,-RCV.ACCOUNTED_CR) "ACCOUNTED_AMOUNT"
,NVL(RCV.ENTERED_DR,-RCV.ENTERED_CR) "ENTERED_AMOUNT"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_DATE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_DATE"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_TYPE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_TYPE"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_RATE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_RATE"
FROM APPS.RCV_RECEIVING_SUB_LEDGER RCV
,APPS.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS CC
,APPS.RCV_TRANSACTIONS RT
,APPS.PO_HEADERS PHA
,APPS.RCV_SHIPMENT_HEADERS RSH
,APPS.PO_LINES PLA
,APPS.PO_VENDORS V
,APPS.HR_LOCATIONS HL
,APPS.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS PLL
,APPS.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS MSI
,APPS.HR_EMPLOYEES E1
WHERE RCV.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = CC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID
AND RCV.ACTUAL_FLAG='A'
AND PHA.AUTHORIZATION_STATUS = 'APPROVED'
AND PHA.TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE = 'STANDARD'
AND PHA.VENDOR_ID = V.VENDOR_ID
AND PHA.AGENT_ID = E1.EMPLOYEE_ID
AND RCV.RCV_TRANSACTION_ID = RT.TRANSACTION_ID
AND RT.PO_HEADER_ID = PHA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_HEADER_ID = PLA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_LINE_ID = PLA.PO_LINE_ID
AND PLA.ITEM_ID = MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID (+)
AND RT.SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID = RSH.SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_LINE_LOCATION_ID = PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID
AND PLL.SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID = HL.LOCATION_ID
AND NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED,0) > NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED,0)
AND (NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED,0) - NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED,0)) > 0.01
AND MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID = RSH.SHIP_TO_ORG_ID
UNION ALL
SELECT RT.TRANSACTION_ID
,(SELECT DISTINCT RH.SEGMENT1
FROM APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES RL
,APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS RH
WHERE PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID = RL.LINE_LOCATION_ID (+)
AND RL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = RH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID(+)
AND ROWNUM = 1) "PR_NUMBER"
,(SELECT DISTINCT E2.FULL_NAME
FROM APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES RL
,APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS RH
,APPS.HR_EMPLOYEES E2
WHERE PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID = RL.LINE_LOCATION_ID (+)
AND RL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = RH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID(+)
AND RH.PREPARER_ID = E2.EMPLOYEE_ID(+)
AND ROWNUM = 1) "PR_PREPARER"
,PHA.TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE "PO TYPE"
,V.VENDOR_NAME "VENDOR_NAME"
,TO_CHAR(REL.CREATION_DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') "PO_CREATION_DATE"
,E1.FULL_NAME "PO_BUYER"
,CC.SEGMENT1||'-'||CC.SEGMENT2||'-'||CC.SEGMENT3||'-'||CC.SEGMENT4||'-'||CC.SEGMENT5||'-'||CC.SEGMENT6||'-'||CC.SEGMENT7||'-'||CC.SEGMENT8 "ACCOUNT"
,PHA.SEGMENT1||'-'||REL.RELEASE_NUM "PO_NUMBER"
,REL.RELEASE_NUM "RELEASE_NUMBER"
,PLA.LINE_NUM "LINE_NUMBER"
,MSI.SEGMENT2 "ITEM_NUMBER"
,MSI.PRIMARY_UNIT_OF_MEASURE "UOM"
,MSI.DESCRIPTION "ITEM_DESCRIPTION"
,PLL.QUANTITY
,PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED
,PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED
,RCV.JE_SOURCE_NAME "TRANSACTION_SOURCE"
,'RECEIPT' "DOCUMENT TYPE"
,RSH.RECEIPT_NUM "DOCUMENT NUMBER"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') "DOCUMENT DATE"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'YYYY') "DOCUMENT DATE (YEAR)"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'MON') "DOCUMENT DATE (MONTH)"
,RCV.CURRENCY_CODE "CURRENCY_CODE"
,RT.PO_UNIT_PRICE*NVL(RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_RATE,1) "UNIT_PRICE_(SGD)"
,RT.QUANTITY "TRANSACTION_QUANTITY"
,NVL(RCV.ACCOUNTED_DR,-RCV.ACCOUNTED_CR) "ACCOUNTED_AMOUNT"
,NVL(RCV.ENTERED_DR,-RCV.ENTERED_CR) "ENTERED_AMOUNT"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_DATE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_DATE"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_TYPE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_TYPE"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_RATE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_RATE"
FROM APPS.RCV_RECEIVING_SUB_LEDGER RCV
,APPS.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS CC
,APPS.RCV_TRANSACTIONS RT
,APPS.PO_HEADERS PHA
,APPS.RCV_SHIPMENT_HEADERS RSH
,APPS.PO_LINES PLA
,APPS.PO_RELEASES REL
,APPS.PO_VENDORS V
,APPS.HR_LOCATIONS HL
,APPS.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS PLL
,APPS.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS MSI
,APPS.HR_EMPLOYEES E1
WHERE RCV.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = CC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID
AND RCV.ACTUAL_FLAG='A'
AND PHA.TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE = 'BLANKET'
AND REL.AUTHORIZATION_STATUS = 'APPROVED'
AND REL.PO_HEADER_ID = PHA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND PHA.VENDOR_ID = V.VENDOR_ID
AND REL.AGENT_ID = E1.EMPLOYEE_ID
AND RCV.RCV_TRANSACTION_ID = RT.TRANSACTION_ID
AND RT.PO_HEADER_ID = PHA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_HEADER_ID = PLA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_LINE_ID = PLA.PO_LINE_ID
AND RT.PO_RELEASE_ID = REL.PO_RELEASE_ID
AND PLA.ITEM_ID = MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID (+)
AND RT.SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID = RSH.SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_LINE_LOCATION_ID = PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID
AND PLL.SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID = HL.LOCATION_ID
AND PLL.PO_RELEASE_ID = REL.PO_RELEASE_ID
AND NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED,0) > NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED,0)
AND (NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED,0) - NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED,0)) > 0.01
AND MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID = RSH.SHIP_TO_ORG_ID
ORDER BY TRANSACTION_ID;
Thanks,
Sumir

Excluded transactions on the Accrual Reconciliation report

Does anyone know how to investigate a non-zero total in the "Excluded TXN" column on the Accrual Reconciliation report? How can we find out what this means?

I guess you are passing in the quantity and amount tolerances. The logic is:
If you have any outstanding amount or quantity in the PO (net_po_line_amount and net_po_line_quantity in the po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all after you rebuild) and if you are passing in the tolerances to the rebuild report, this excluded transactions will show up.
Say you have po line has qty of 2 and price $44. You have received 2 but billed only 1. You have not yet written this quantity 1 off.
When you run the accrual rebuild you will get the net_po_line_amount as -44 and and net_po_line_quantity as -1 (since you have accrued (more credits) then invioced (less debits)).
Nowif since have not written off this po line, and if you pass amount tolerance as 5 and quantity tolerance as 2 then this $44 shows as excluded (since you told the report to take tolerances into account).
here is the query:
SELECT par.po_header_id,po_line_id,line_location_id,net_po_line_amount,net_po_line_quantity,transaction_amount,par.org_id,poh.segment1
ROUND ( (DECODE (par.write_off_flag
, 'Y', 0
, DECODE ('N'
, 'Y', 0
, 'N', DECODE (SIGN (ABS (par.net_po_line_amount) - 45)
, 1, 0
, DECODE (SIGN ( ABS (ROUND (par.net_po_line_quantity, 4))
- 2
, 1, 0
, par.transaction_amount
/ 4
* 4 zero_bal_total
FROM po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all par
, po_lookup_codes plu
, org_organization_definitions ood
, mtl_system_items msi
,po_headers_all poh
WHERE ood.organization_id = par.transaction_organization_id
AND plu.lookup_type = 'ACCRUAL TRX SOURCE'
AND plu.lookup_code = par.transaction_source_code
AND msi.organization_id=&your master org_Id
AND msi.inventory_item_id (+) = par.inventory_item_id
and net_po_line_amount <>0
and poh.po_header_Id=par.po_header_Id
HTH.
Thanks
Nagamohan

What is "Invoice Price Variance" in Accrual Reconciliation Report

Hi friends
can anyone pls explain me the Invoice Price Variance column data of Accrual Reconciliation Report? how most of the time ive seen this as 0. how can this be more than 0? im just experimenting with Accrual Reconciliation Report. pls help me.
thanks in advance.
LISAN

hi
thanks for your reply. assume that PO total is 150. invoice is created of 100. in this case should i see an amount in Invoice Price Variance? im not seeing any change in Invoice Price Variance. for me what happens here is Transaction Amount - Accounted is shown -50 as its still to create an invoice of amount 50 which is in fact the accrual balance. pls give me a feedback on this. i want to produce a scenario which will make the invoice price variance more or less than 0.
thanks
Lisan

R12 Accounts Payable Manager

Hi,
I am using Oracle R12 Accounts Payable Manager. Currently when a payment is made to our suppliers a remittance file is produced in PDF format. I would still like to have this but at the same time I would really like to be able to set up e-mail remittances to a selection (not all) of our suppliers. Is this possible, and if so how?
Kind Regards

Hi,
I don't know if the source is XML.
You may find this from the SYSADMIN responsibility, please navigate to Concurrent Request > Program > Define.
If your output is PDF then most probably it should be a XML report.
Please refer:
Oracle E-Business Suite System Administrator's Guide - Configuration
On this tab there is a cell with supplier e-mail but this cannot be populated. I would have thought that the option to send remits directly to suppliers
I am not sure, whether you can send third party mails via workflow mailer if the suppliers are not registered as EBS users. As far as I know the solution to your quesiton would be is by using XML bursting.
Please ask your development team to have a look at this. Sysadmin support will be partially required.
Best Regards,

Accrual Reconciliation Report

Hi All,
I need to understand the concept of accrual reconciliation,
Please let me know a source or plese explain in the forum.
Further let me know if all the PO related trasactions appear in the accrual reconciliation report or only the items where there is a miss match.
Thanks and Regards,
Migara

Hi,
Im sorry.Somehow two issues were posted for the same issue.
However I went through the document,but still I its not clear the meaning of this.
As per the document A/P Line Match - A/P invoice matching transaction for which there is a receipt against the same purchase order and purchase order line.
Does this mean a situation something like this.
PO line 1 has a quantity 10 and unit price 10
and received 5 item in one receipt (receipt 01) and received 5 items in another receipt (receipt 02)
Then the invoice is matched to the receipt 02.
Please let me knw.
Thanks and Regards,
MPH
Edited by: user11337190 on 17-Nov-2010 15:16

Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild - No Report/Accrual Reconciliation Report

Hi Experts,
It is well-known that Accrual Reconciliation Report shows out the data from po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all i.e. only that data which resides in po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all table will be picked and showed on the report based on net_po_line_amount and net_po_line_quantity (i.e. depends on the tolerance levels given). But if I want to show the data from backend thru query, i will use this table and give my conditions for net_po_line_amount and net_po_line_quantity. As mentioned in Note:433683.1 in Metalink, it is mentioned that:
The following two columns in the PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP_ALL table
determines whether a Transaction appears on the Accrual Reconciliation
Report.
Net_po_line_quantity
Net_po_line_amount
For a Transaction not to appear on the Accrual Reconciliation Report
net transaction quantity AND the net transaction amount for each PO Line must be
less than or equal to the values entered in the tolerance parameters (or <= 0,
which is the default value).
This means I will make my query which should match with the report data:
select * from po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all
where net_po_line_amount>0 and net_po_line_quanity>0;
But I have seen some cases where both these are zero and still shown on the report, i have seen few more cases where these are null and still shown on the report. May be we need to add more conditions or somewhere I am doing wrong! Please suggest what all conditions we should consider while incorporating with this type of requirement.
Any suggestions on this will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Sumir Chawla

Hi,
Pleaser refer the below documentation ...
Accrual Reconciliation Report Errored Out With APP-FND-01564: ORACLE error 942 in FDFGDF [ID 1440284.1]
Regards,
Ivruksha

URGENT: Grouping in Accrual Reconciliation Report

Hello
Could anyone please explain how grouping is done in the 'Accrual Reconciliation Report' - POXACREC ? How does the group - G_item_vendor work? Is grouping being done here?
My requirement is to customize this report by the logic that : If item number is null, grouping should be done by Description. If anyone has any suggestions, please do reply.
I am working on Oracle Applications version : 11.5.10.2

Hi Anju,
I suggest you to post this query on "oracle applications forum".
Still I have an idea, you can give a try:
Why can't you group on item||Description {concatenating both fields} field. Use this field just for group and use the individual fields for display and other purposes.
Br,
Gouri Sankar

R12 - Accounts Payable & PO Accrual Reconciliation Report - write offs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for