R3 View Join Condition

Hi Gurus,
In creating view in R3, is it possible to create a join condition for the last 3 digits of the field?
TABLE1.FIELD1 = XXXX123 --- TABLE2.FIELD1 = AAAA123
Thanks in advance..

Hi Jojo,
We cannot Create a join condition for the last 3 digits of the field while creating views.T1.field1 should be equal to T2.field.
We cannot use Offset for this.
for more details on Views Go through htis URL.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/cf/21ec5d446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
Thanks,
-Vijay.

Similar Messages

DB view - join conditions order

Hi gurus
I wonder if, while creating a DB view, the order of join conditions will affect the overall performance. In my case, i need to join COEP, COBK and TKA01. Actually the join conditions are, in this order:
COEP MANDT = TKA01 MANDT
COEP KOKRS = TKA01 KOKRS
COBK MANDT = COEP MANDT
COBK KOKRS = COEP KOKRS
COBK BELNR = COEP BELNR
To achieve a better performance, may I change the order (up/down or left/right)?
Thank you! <removed by moderator>
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jan 19, 2012

My problem is that basis admnistrator is asking me why in the execution plan there is a TABLE ACCESS FULL COBK (see 5th point of the log). Any suggestion?
SELECT STATEMENT ( Estimated Costs = 644.937 , Estimated #Rows = 0 )
--- 7 HASH JOIN
( Estim. Costs = 644.937 , Estim. #Rows = 3.507.206 )
Estim. CPU-Costs = 41.978.142.620 Estim. IO-Costs = 640.056
Memory Used KB: 1.252.352
Access Predicates
-- 2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TKA01
Estim. CPU-Costs = 5.909 Estim. IO-Costs = 0
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN TKA01~0
Search Columns: 1
Estim. CPU-Costs = 2.784 Estim. IO-Costs = 0
Access Predicates
 --- 6 HASH JOIN
( Estim. Costs = 644.895 , Estim. #Rows = 2.475.675 )
Estim. CPU-Costs = 41.623.110.298 Estim. IO-Costs = 640.056
Memory Used KB: 21.261.312
Access Predicates
-- 4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID COEP
( Estim. Costs = 502.319 , Estim. #Rows = 2.475.675 )
Estim. CPU-Costs = 19.972.892.425 Estim. IO-Costs = 499.997
3 INDEX RANGE SCAN COEP~1
( Estim. Costs = 149.180 , Estim. #Rows = 2.475.675 )
Search Columns: 3
Estim. CPU-Costs = 16.424.997.869 Estim. IO-Costs = 147.270
Access Predicates Filter Predicates
5 TABLE ACCESS FULL COBK
 ( Estim. Costs = 100.134 , Estim. #Rows = 20.711.400 )
 Estim. CPU-Costs = 16.102.369.535 Estim. IO-Costs = 98.262
 Filter Predicates

Set operator NE in Database View creation in join condition

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to set NE(not equal) operator in join condition of Database View creation. Could you please help me how to set in operator.
Join condition :
Ex : BSAK-AUGBL NE BSAK-BELNR.
You know that by default operator is '='. i want to set NE in place of '='.
Thanks,

Hi Chinna,
Check whether if there is any possibility or not to include more key fields like bukrs, lifnr, gjahr etc in the where condition, so that you query may result faster. Then, there won't be any necessary to create the view.
Hope this helps.
Please reward if useful.
Thanks,
Srinivasa

Reg: Join Conditions for Tables to create a View for Generic Extraction

Hi Experts,
Am trying to extract the data from Solman, for this purpose am creating a Generic Extractor based on three tables. So, can anyone please help me out by providing the join conditions to create a view based upon the following three tables,
1. CRM_ORDERM_H
2. DNOD_NOTIF
3. DNOD_NOTIF_S
Anyways i require the following fields in the extractor finally:
CRM CHANGED AT
GUID
SAP COMPONENT
RELEASE
REPORTED BY
These are the some of the major fields that i require in the final extractior. Please help me out ASAP with the table join conditions..
Will Assign Points for the helpfull answer...
Thanks,
Gattu.

Hi,
I don't know the table CRM_ORDERM_H however you can link DNOD_NOTIF and DNOD_NOTIF_S
DNOD_NOTIF_S-CLIENT = DNOD_NOTIF-CLIENT
DNOD_NOTIF_S-GUIDS = DNOD_NOTIF-GUIDS
For the third table could you please paste here its definition like the hereunder?
Transp. table      DNOD_NOTIF       Active
Short Text         Notification Header
   Field           KeyInitData element    Data TyLengthDecimaShort Text
   CLIENT        X    X   MANDT           CLNT        3     0Client
   GUIDH         X    X   DNOT_GUIDH      RAW        16     0GUID Notification
   .INCLUDE               DNOS_NOTIF_INT STRU        0     0Notifications (Header, Internal Fields)
   OBJNR                  DNOT_OBJNR      CHAR       22     0Status Management Object Number
   STATUS                 DNOT_STATUS     CHAR        1     0Notification Status
   DELETED                DNOT_DELE_N     CHAR        1     0Deletion Indicator Notification
   PROCESSOR              DNOT_PROC       CHAR       12     0Current Processor
   TYPE_PROC              DNOT_TYPE_PRC   CHAR        2     0Type of Processor
   REPORTER               DNOT_REPORTER   CHAR       12     0Reported By
   TYPE_REPO              DNOT_TYPE_REP   CHAR        2     0Type of Notification Creator
   CREA_TSTMP             DNOT_CREA_TSTMP DEC        15     0Entry Time Stamp
   CHNG_TSTMP             DNOT_CHNG_TSTMP DEC        15     0Time of Last Change
   START_TSTMP            DNOT_START_TSTMPDEC        15     0Initial Response Time - Time Stamp
   END_TSTMP              DNOT_END_TSTMP DEC        15     0Requested End of Processing - Time Stamp
   CLO_TSTMP              DNOT_CLO_TSTMP DEC        15     0Completion Time Stamp
   .INCLUDE               DNOS_NOTIF_EXT STRU        0     0Notifications (Header, External Fields)
   NUMB                   DNOT_NUM        CHAR       12     0Notification Number (External)
   REFNUM                 DNOT_REFNUM     CHAR       20     0External Reference Number
   TYPE_NOTIF             DNOT_TYPE_N     CHAR        6     0Message category
   CATEGORY               DNOT_CATEGORY   CHAR       12     0Topic, Area
   SUBJECT                DNOT_SUBJECT    CHAR       60     0Re:
   PRIORITY               DNOT_PRIORITY   CHAR        1     0Notification priority
   LANGUAGE               DNOT_LANG_N     LANG        1     0Notification Language
hope this helps...
Olivier.

Problem in Spras field for join condition in creating new views

Hi,
I want to create a new view for three tables t1 t2 and t3 say.....i want to join this three tables like
table field table field
t1 mandt = t2 mandt.
t1 vkbur = t2 vkbur.
And other condition is t2-spras = 'E' now.... how should i give this condition in the join condition as u have to give the other table name and the field name on the other side too..... table t1 has no filed in its table for the field spras.........so i just have to give t2-spras as 'E'. But this is throwing error...Please help

Hi,
1.u can specify the first thing i.e. t1 mandt = t2 mandt and t1 vkbur = t2 vkbur in the join conditions even if there is no relation ship b/w t1 and t2 on vkbur.simply u specify the join condition manually.
2.for the second thing....wat u did is rite.......
I think it will work.
Thanks ,
Jyothi.D
want to create a new view for three tables t1 t2 and t3 say.....i want to join this three tables like
table field table field
t1 mandt = t2 mandt.
t1 vkbur = t2 vkbur.
And other condition is t2-spras = 'E' now.... how should i give this condition in the join condition as u have to give the other table name and the field name on the other side too..... table t1 has no filed in its table for the field spras.........so i just have to give t2-spras as 'E'. But this is throwing error...Please help

Mismatch in the datatypes in join conditions of the views

Hi guys,
For creating a view I am trying to join 2 tables( EUIINSTLN & EUFASS).
I have selected 4 fields in first table(EUIINSTLN) and 3 fields in the second table(EUFASS).
The join condition is in such a way that the first table field(EUIINSTLN-ANLAGE) is input to second table primary field(EUFASS-OBJKEY).
The first table field(EUIINSTLN-ANLAGE) is of 10 char length and the input field(EUFASS-OBJKEY) in the second table primary field(EUFASS-OBJKEY) is 70 characters in length.
When we take the value in the first table field(EUIINSTLN-ANLAGE) individually and give input( to EUFASS-OBJKEY) in the second table((EUFASS) it works fine even though there is mismatch in the datatypes. I.e., it works individually.
But when this data is viewed using the DDIC view it doens't show any records, since the field length condition is not met. i.e., mismatch in the datatypes takes place. The below is the condition I have given in the view - table/join condition.
EUIINSTLN     MANDT     =     EUFASS     MANDT
EUIINSTLN     ANLAGE     =     EUFASS     OBJKEY.
Some persons have said that I can delimit the 70 char field(EUFASS-OBJKEY) to 10 char.
How can I delimit the length of 70 characters field(EUFASS-OBJKEY) to 10 char in the join conditions of the view.
Appreciate if any one give any solution on this.
Regards
Mac

> EUIINSTLN     MANDT     =     EUFASS     MANDT
> EUIINSTLN     ANLAGE     =     EUFASS     OBJKEY.
Hi Mac,
You can limit the number of char in OBJKEY to 10.
Join Condition
EUIINSTLN-MANDT     =     EUFASS-MANDT
EUIINSTLN-ANLAGE      =     EUFASS-OBJKEY(10).
Best regards,
Shahid Malayil

Where can I find join conditions in the ALL_IV_XFORM views?

OWB 10.2
where can I find join conditions in the ALL_IV_XFORM views? And if they cannot be found there, where are they to be found?
Regards,
Jaap.

Hi Jaap,
ALL_IV_XFORM views are called Mapping Model Views . These are available at repostory owner user.
ALL_IV_XFORM_MAPS
ALL_IV_XFORM_MAP_COMPONENTS
ALL_IV_XFORM_MAP_PARAMETERS
ALL_IV_XFORM_MAP_PROPERTIES
ALL_IV_XFORM_MAP_DETAILS
Connect repository user and execute below statement
SELECT VIEW_NAME FROM ALL_VIEWS WHERE VIEW_name like 'ALL_%';
Regards,
Venkat

How to make the join condition in a view with this tables LFBK LFA1 TIBAN?

Hi gurus,
how can I make the join conditions for those 4 tables LFBK LFA1 TIBAN and BNKA ?
thanx
Moderator message: please (re)search and try yourself first.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Nov 22, 2010 4:44 PM

Well, use
LFA1-LIFNR EQ LFBK-LIFNR
LFBK-BANKS EQ BNKA-BANKS
LFBK-BANKK EQ BNKA-BANKK
LFBK-BANKS EQ TIBAN-BANKS
LFBK-BANKK EQ TIBAN-BANKK
LFBK-BANKN EQ TIBAN-BANKN
LFBK-BKONT EQ TIBAN-BKONT
Not very hard...
Regards,
Raymond

Join condition between PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_ALL and WF_NOTIFICATIONS

Hi,
Could anyone tell me what is the join condition between PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_ALL and WF_NOTIFICATIONS?
I joined these two tables by WF_NOTIFICATIONS.ITEM_KEY = PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_ALL .WF_ITEM_KEY.But I cannot found some approved requisitions item key in WF_NOTIFICATIONS table.
Please help.
I paste my query below:
SELECT PRH.ORG_ID ORG_ID,
WF.ITEM_KEY,
WF.FROM_ROLE,
PRH.WF_ITEM_KEY,
WF.RECIPIENT_ROLE APPROVERS_NAME,
TRUNC(NVL(PRH.APPROVED_DATE, '')) DATE_APPROVED,
WF.SUBJECT SUBJECT,
PRH.DESCRIPTION REQ_DESC,
PRH.SEGMENT1,
(SUM(NVL(PRL.AMOUNT, 0)) +
SUM(NVL(PRL.UNIT_PRICE, 0) * NVL(PRL.QUANTITY, 0))) REQ_AMT,
GL.SEGMENT1 || '.' || GL.SEGMENT2 || '.' || GL.SEGMENT3 || '.' ||
GL.SEGMENT4 || '.' || GL.SEGMENT5 || '.' || GL.SEGMENT6 || '.' ||
GL.SEGMENT7 || '.' || GL.SEGMENT8 CHARGE_ACCT
FROM APPS.WF_NOTIFICATIONS WF,
APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_ALL PRH,
APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL PRL,
APPS.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PRD,
APPS.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS GL
WHERE WF.FROM_ROLE IN ('GHAWKINS', 'GHALVERSON', 'NCERNOTTA', 'DCOLLOPY', 'RHAY')
AND BEGIN_DATE > SYSDATE - 60
AND WF.MESSAGE_TYPE = 'REQAPPRV'
AND WF.ITEM_KEY = PRH.WF_ITEM_KEY --added
AND PRH.AUTHORIZATION_STATUS = 'APPROVED'
AND PRL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = PRH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID
AND PRD.REQUISITION_LINE_ID = PRL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID
AND PRD.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = GL.CODE_COMBINATION_ID
GROUP BY PRH.ORG_ID,
WF.ITEM_KEY,
WF.FROM_ROLE,
PRH.WF_ITEM_KEY,
WF.BEGIN_DATE,
WF.SUBJECT,
WF.RECIPIENT_ROLE,
PRH.APPROVED_DATE,
PRH.DESCRIPTION,
PRH.SEGMENT1,
PRL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID,
GL.SEGMENT1 || '.' || GL.SEGMENT2 || '.' || GL.SEGMENT3 || '.' ||
GL.SEGMENT4 || '.' || GL.SEGMENT5 || '.' || GL.SEGMENT6 || '.' ||
GL.SEGMENT7 || '.' || GL.SEGMENT8

Pl see if these MOS Docs can help -
603232.1 - How to Diagnose Purchasing Document Approval Routing
579522.1 - Forward Document Form FAQ
431767.1 - How To View Requisition From The Email Notifications For Which Workflow Data Is Purged
HTH
Srini

Very urgent (using join conditions in PI)

Hi PI gurus.
My scenario is SOAP to JDBC(Portal Webdynpro screen to Oracle database).
I have a requirement to fetch some complex data from the database using complex nested queries.How can i go ahead using join conditions in PI.Here the client is insisiting only on queries and rejected all other methods for solving this like
1)Java proxies
2)stored procedures written in the database system
3)Create a logical view in database system .
The following option is permitted for me by the client to follow
· Using the SQL_QUERY as a query method in the JDBC Receiver Channel in XI
· Trying out JOIN conditions to make multiple query into a single query:- Here need to check the feasibility of the JOIN Condition
Please help me to complete our task.
points will be rewarded for helpful answers.
Thanks & Regards
         Veena

Define the data structures (Request & Response)
A JDBC Synchronous scenario, the response message type name is dependent on the request message type name
i.e., if request is
Dear Raj,
This is my scenario SOAP-to-JDBC(syn) with out using BPM's.
4datatypes & message types,
MT_JDBCRequest
--->Statement1
My response msg type
MT_JDBCRequest_response
>Statement1_response
>row
twoMessage Interfaces, two mappings (for request & response) and one interface mapping
Configure the Objects In Integration directory.
Define the Web services and save the WSDL file After completion of configuration.
WSDL file is used for the integration of Portal - PI scenario.
Process Flow:
1.     User requests for a report from the available list of PSMA reports by providing required set of input parameters.
2.     Portal forwards the request with these input parameters to PI using web service model through SOAP protocol and the required results are derived from PI
3.     Report is viewed on portal screen.
Thanks & regards,
   Veena

HR Tables Join Condition

Hello,
My requirment to extract data from the below HR Tables to BW.
Fot that purpose i am developing a VIEW based on these tables...
what are fields that are present in all tables as i can use them in by join condition
HR Tables
HRP1000
HRP1001
HRP1007
HRP1011
HRP1005
Thanks

Hi Suresh,
Thanks for the info provided.
I didn't understand exactly what your saying with regards to
'Why don't you simply dump these into soam staging Tables on your BW system & then build your Views/Cubes off the staging tables'
Could you please explain me in a bit details.
Actually my reporting requirments is to have the following fields
Field Name - Table Name
OBJID -HRP1000
OTYPE-HRP1000
STATUS-HRP1007
MOAVG- HRP1011
SOBID-HRP1001
TRFGI -HRP1005
BEGDA-HRP1000
tHANKS

Issue with join condition while using in the corelated sub query

Bees,
I am not able to use the below query since i have used a join condition in the corelated sub qery inline view.But i have a requirement like this . Please help me on this
select * from dept d
where exists (select 1 from (
select deptno
from emp where deptno= d.deptno)
Thank you
Boooo

Hi,
I've never seen a general solution for how to reference columns from main query a from sub-query c, where c is is sub-query of b, which is a sub-query of a.
Whenever I've wanted to, I've been able to get the desired results with a different approach.
In this case, you seem to want
SELECT     *
FROM     dept     d
WHERE     EXISTS     (
          SELECT     1
          FROM     emp
          WHERE     deptno     = d.deptno
          );I'm guessing at your data and desired output.

Master Detail Form is ignoring the 4th join condition

Hello All,
I have master detail relationship between two tables with a
composite foreign key (of 4 columns). I'm creating a master
detail form in O9iAS Portal 3.0.9.8.0 on these 2 tables
successfully with no errors. The only thing I have noticed, is
that the wizard does not populate the join conditions
automatically in step#3. The form runs Okay but it ignores the
last condition (i.e., 4th), which means that it brings too many
details records.
Any ideas
Much appreciated if you can CC me: [email protected]
Hamada Hima

I had this same problem with master/detail form and 4 join conditions. I opened up a TAR and after several weeks
Oracle determined this to be a bug and submitted it to developers.
For a work around, I created a view with two of the join fields concatenated together, then created another md form
with 3 join conditions and it worked. Good luck.

Join condition validation error in owb 10gR2

Hi friends,
When I tried to validate the join condition in the mapping im getting the below error like
an error occurred during expression validation, bad expression return type
When I googled for the above error, I got the below link mentioning like a bug for that join condition validation problem
https://forums.oracle.com/thread/717194
In which it is mentioned like a BugNo: 7417869 for that issue.
Is there any fix for that bug??
Thanks in advance.
Brgds,
Mini

Dear Allan,
Happy to get reply from you and sorry for my late reply as im been stuck with other work
Like you said, I downloaded the required patch 4898608 for the validation bug in mapping with owb 10.2.0.4. By viewing the readme.txt file of the patch I followed the below steps like
Set the ORACLE_HOME environment variable to point to the OWB Home
Add $ORACLE_HOME/OPatch in the PATH
Stopped the runtime service using the supplied SQL*PLUS script stop_service.sql as a rep_owner
      OWB_HOME/rtp/sql/stop_service.sql
After the above three steps I applied the opatch like below in cmd prompt
C:\orahome\10gR3_1\OPatch>opatch version
Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.4.9
OPatch Version: 10.2.0.4.9
OPatch succeeded.
C:\OraHome_1\OPatch>opatch apply
Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.4.9
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.4.9
Copyright (c) 2009, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Oracle Home       : C:\OraHome_1
Central Inventory : C:\Program Files (x86)\Oracle\Inventory
   from           : n/a
OPatch version    : 10.2.0.4.9
OUI version       : 10.2.0.1.0
OUI location      : C:\OraHome_1\oui
Log file location : C:\OraHome_1\cfgtoollogs\opatch\opatch2013-06-24_18-14-27PM.
log
Patch history file: C:\OraHome_1\cfgtoollogs\opatch\opatch_history.txt
Failed to load the patch object. Possible causes are:
The specified path is not an interim Patch shiphome
Meta-data files are missing from the patch area
Patch location = C:\OraHome_1\OPatch
Details = PatchObject constructor: Input file "C:\OraHome_1\OPatch\etc\config\
actions" or "C:\OraHome_1\OPatch\etc\config\inventory" does not exist.
ApplySession failed: PatchObject constructor: Input file "C:\OraHome_1\OPatch\et
c\config\actions" or "C:\OraHome_1\OPatch\etc\config\inventory" does not exist.
System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
OPatch failed with error code = 73
C:\OraHome_1\OPatch>
Im not sure why the above error is occuring, kindly help me with that error.
Thanks in advance.
Brgds,
Mini

INVENTORY & ORDER MANAGEMENT Tables join conditions required

Hi All,
I have to create one view, it has to display item_number, item_description,quantity_in_warehouse and pendingquantity_in_salesorder.
query is based on INVENTORY & ORDER MANAGEMENT Tables. i have written below query, it is not giving expected output. Kindly go through once and rectify me if i did any thing wrong while writing the join conditions.
SELECT mtlb.segment1 Item_Number,
mtlb.description Item_Description,
mtld.transaction_quantity Quantity_in_Wearhouse,
oel.ordered_quantity PendingQuantity_in_SalesOrder
FROM mtl_system_items_b mtlb,
mtl_onhand_quantities_detail mtld,
oe_order_headers_all oeh,
oe_order_lines_all oel
WHERE mtlb.inventory_item_id = mtld.inventory_item_id
AND mtlb.organization_id ; = mtld.organization_id
AND mtlb.inventory_item_id ; = oel.inventory_item_id
AND oeh.header_id ; = oel.header_id
AND oeh.org_id ; = oel.org_id
AND oeh.ship_from_org_id ; = mtlb.organization_id
AND oel.ship_from_org_id ; = mtlb.organization_id
AND mtld.subinventory_code LIKE 'Warehouse'
AND oel.flow_status_code LIKE 'AWAITING_SHIPPING'
ORDER BY mtlb.segment1;
it is bit urgent. please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks.
Edited by: user627525 on Jul 19, 2010 4:35 AM

Hi Jonny,
Thanks for your reply. it is very useful for me. need small clarification.
i have execute the query that u have given. please find the following output.
segment1 order_number line_number shipment_number on_hand
210020004000011 10005 1 1 139150
210020004000011 10006 1 1 139150
210020004000013 10005 2 1 27675
210020004000013 10006 2 1 27675
i have modified the query and added column ordered_quantity from oe_order_lines_all table.
SELECT
mtlb.segment1 ; as Item_Number,
mtlb.description as Item_Description,
sum(mtld.primary_transaction_quantity) as Quantity_in_Whouse,
oel.ordered_quantity as PQuantity_in_SOrder
FROM oe_order_headers_all oeh,
oe_order_lines_all oel,
mtl_system_items_b mtlb,
mtl_onhand_quantities_detail mtld
WHERE oel.header_id = oeh.header_id
AND oel.inventory_item_id = mtlb.inventory_item_id
AND oel.ship_from_org_id = mtlb.organization_id
AND oel.inventory_item_id = mtld.inventory_item_id
AND oel.ship_from_org_id = mtld.organization_id
AND oel.flow_status_code = 'AWAITING_SHIPPING'
AND mtld.subinventory_code = 'Warehouse'
GROUP By mtlb.segment1,mtlb.description,oel.ordered_quantity
ORDER BY mtlb.segment1;
i have executed the above query. Quantity_in_Whouse is showing double the actual available quantity.
item_number item_description Quantity_in_Whouse PQuantity_in_SOrder
210020004000011 item1 278300 100
210020004000013 item3 55350 125
when i executed the below query, Quantity_in_Whouse is showing 139050 and 27550 respectively.
SELECT mtlb.segment1 Item_Number,
mtlb.description,
sum(mtld.primary_transaction_quantity) Quantity_in_Whouse
FROM mtl_system_items_b mtlb,
mtl_onhand_quantities_detail mtld
WHERE mtlb.inventory_item_id = mtld.inventory_item_id
AND mtlb.organization_id ; = mtld.organization_id
AND mtld.subinventory_code LIKE 'Warehouse'
and mtlb.segment1 in ('210020004000011','210020004000013')
group by mtlb.segment1, mtlb.description
ORDER BY mtlb.segment1;
item_number item_description Quantity_in_Whouse
210020004000011 item1 139050
210020004000013 item3 27550
please give some solution so that i can display Quantity_in_Whouse as 139050 and 27550 .
if i am any thing wrong please rectify me.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: user627525 on Jul 19, 2010 7:54 AM
Edited by: user627525 on Jul 19, 2010 7:56 AM
Edited by: user627525 on Jul 19, 2010 9:39 AM

R3 View Join Condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for