RADIUS query with different interface than Management

Hi there,
I am currently setting up a wireless controller which is to service several SSIDs which are mapped to physically separated LANs.
So far there has been no problem in doing the config.
However I discovered later that for each SSID a separate RADIUS server has to be queried, which are also in physically separated networks and where no routing exists/will exist.
Now my question is, if there is any possibility to somehow tell the WLC to use a different source interface in order to enable the usage of
RADIUS Server 1 on Network A for SSID A and to use
RADIUS Server 2 on Network B for SSID B.
Regards,
Patrick

I tested the feature and authentication requests via the dynamic-interface were successful when enabling this feature.
@George: We run the latest code 7.0.116.0, which must be the first where this feature got introduced. I don't recall seeing it in 7.0.98.0.
However the explanation of this feature is found in the documentation of WCS. Not a single mention in the WLC documentation.
Regarding the routing feature. I have tested it also on a 5508 WLC. As soon as you try to define a gateway, which is not in the service-port subnet you'll get an error, which is effectively the same problem.
But as the "Radius Server Overwrite interface" feature does exactly what I needed, this issue is solved.

Similar Messages

  • Use plan from stored_outlines from query with different syntax?

    Hello,
    I'd like to know is there any ability to use via stored_outlines plan from query with different syntax?
    Database version - 11.1.06
    If yes, maybe you'll take a look at steps (based on Metalink 726802.1), what I tried to do to make it work (with no success):
    alter session set create_stored_outlines=good;
    run good query
    create private outline good from SYS_OUTLINE_0... -< GOOD
    alter session set create_stored_outlines=bad;
    run bad query
    create private outline good from SYS_OUTLINE_0... -< BAD
    update ol$ set sql_text, textlen, signature, hash_value, hash_value2 from BAD to GOOD records
    leave ol$hintcount for GOOD untouched
    delete ol$ where ol_name='BAD';
    delete ol$hints where ol_name='BAD';
    delete ol$nodes where ol_name='BAD';
    execute dbms_outln_edit.refresh_private_outline('GOOD');
    alter session set sql_trace=true;
    alter session set use_private_outlines=true;
    run bad query
    examine trace file and find that it use execution plan different from both bad and good queries
    PS: Originally bad query is posted already Re: Poor performance while join of 2 comprehensive large views and small table
    PPS: Also I review thread CBO not picking correct indexes or doing Full Scans
    Thanks,
    Sergiy
    Edited by: kiberpress on Sep 30, 2009 6:59 AM

    A query with different syntax would result in a different hash value.
    Stored outlines work based on hash value.
    Your question is probably answered now.
    Sybrand Bakker
    Senior Oracle DBA

  • Simple spatial query with different SRID

    Can anyone help me with just a real simple spatial query with different SRID.
    Here is the error i get when i perform the query:
    AND SDO_RELATE(A.geometrie_point, B.GEOMETRIE_POLYGONE, 'mask=anyinteract querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE'
    ERROR at line 4:
    ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
    ORA-13207: incorrect use of the [IN COMPATIBLE BOUNDS in SDO_RELATE] operator
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD", line 84
    ORA-06512: at line 4

    Hi,
    I am using 8.1.7.2 and i have the lattest spatial patch.
    From the start i had different SRID. The only thing i changed was the bounds of the coordinate system.
    I reset my bounds of the coordinate system with SRID 8307 to -180,
    180 in X (longitude), and -90,90 in Y (latitude) to see if the query window geometry
    (geom2) will be transformed to the coordinate system of the layer geometries (geom1)
    Her is the content of the user_sdo_geom_metadata :
    GIS_PCP GEOMETRIE_POINT
    SDO_DIM_ARRAY(SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X', -5800000, 3600000, .00000005), SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y', 3516000, 6000000, .00000005))
    82227
    GIS_TEST GEOMETRIE_POLYGONE
    SDO_DIM_ARRAY(SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X', -180, 180, .00000005), SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y', -90, 90, .00000005))
    8307
    Here is my query :
    select /*+ ordered */ A.no_point
    from gis_pcp A, gis_test B
    WHERE SDO_RELATE(A.geometrie_POINT, B.GEOMETRIE_POLYGONE, 'mask=anyinteract querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE';
    Here is my result :
    WHERE SDO_RELATE(A.geometrie_POINT, B.GEOMETRIE_POLYGONE, 'mask=anyinteract querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE'
    ERROR at line 3:
    ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
    ORA-13207: incorrect use of the [IN COMPATIBLE BOUNDS in SDO_RELATE] operator
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD", line 84
    ORA-06512: at line 4
    If i change the bounds of GIS_TEST to the exact bouns of GIS_PCP then i dont have the error message above and i have correct results. Do i have the adjust the bounds of every layer to fit the biggest bound?

  • BYOD Solution with different product than Cisco ISE

    Hello,
    Will it possible to make BYOD WiFi with different product than cisco ISE? such as Dell ClearPass or some sort of other product which does support Cisco WLC 5508.
    Regards,

    Sure it's possible... Dell resells Aruba's ClearPass, so really it's up to the vendor implementing ClearPass to understand what is possible or not. Both ISE and ClearPass does OnBoarding, which is used for BYOD. Both require licenses for this added feature also. There might be other ways to achieved BYOD, but it depends in what you want and what the product can do. 

  • Moveing average price after posting invoice with different value  than GR

    Hello all
    I have a question as in subject.
    If I will post goods receipt and after this I would like to post an invoice in MIRO with different value than in goods receipt , the MAP on my stock will change about this different???

    Hi,
    Your MAP will get recalculated as the price difference will change the total value of the stock and the stock quantity will remain the same
    MAP=Total value/Total stock
    Hope this will help you
    Reward if useful
    Thanx and Regards
    SHYAM.R

  • Same query with different explain plans

    Hi All,
    I have one of the select query with different explain plans on two separate env, the query fetches the correct index on test env whereas on prod it's not fetching the same index.
    The structure, indices, no. of rows are similar in CRMINFO table with up-to-date statistics.
    Env Details :
    OS - Sun Solaris 5.10
    DB - 10.2.0.4
    Init param:
    Optimizer_mode = ALL_ROWS
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 5
    optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
    optimizer_index_caching integer 90
    optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 30
    Query :*
    SELECT COUNT (*)
    FROM CRMINFO
    WHERE RETAILER = :1
    AND STATUS = 20
    AND EXC = :1
    AND SUBNO IS NULL
    Expain Plan (TST):
    SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 916 Bytes: 19 Cardinality: 1                
    3 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 19 Cardinality: 1           
    2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE TST.CRMINFO Cost: 916 Bytes: 16,663 Cardinality: 877      
    1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX TST.CRMINFO_X1 Cost: 42 Cardinality: 12,549
    Index (TST):
    CRMINFO_X1(EXC, RETAILER, STATUS)
    Explain Plan (PROD):
    SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 1,832 Bytes: 19 Cardinality: 1                
    3 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 19 Cardinality: 1           
    2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PROD.CRMINFO Cost: 1,832 Bytes: 2,052 Cardinality: 108      
    1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PROD.CRMINFO_X2 Cost: 117 Cardinality: 42,519
    Index (PROD):
    CRMINFO_X2 (RETAILER)
    How does Oracle calculates the cost and decides which index it should fetch ? Why it didn't choose the same index as of test env? How should i approach and which domains i need to dig-in to find the cause?
    I did try playing with the above mentioned init parameters but it didn't help at all.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    ~Pointer

    Pointer wrote:
    Hmm, my worry is how do i force oracle to grap the proper index on prod i.e (CRMINFO_X1). I certainly believe it's a bad approach on adding a hint in the select statement and to force oralce to fetch that index.Why do you believe that, the index you mention is the "proper" index versus what Oracle is choosing? Can you prove with hinting that the "proper" index results in a faster and more efficient execution plan? If it does, then the next place I would look at is the statistics for the tables and columns of interest. From here you could try and estimate why Oracle thinks the other index is better. Another option is to run a 10053 (CBO) trace and see why Oracle thinks it is better.
    I would not support a hint in a production environment, except in the most extreme cases. Usually the CBO makes the right choice, but it only can if the statistics match the distribution of data.
    Refreshing the data may help me simulating the issue on TST but it wouldn't help me to understand why on prod it uses CRMINFO_X2 instead of CRMINFO_X1 which has all the three columns in the Where clause of the query.It would help because it's a test environment and you wouldn't have to do any queries directly on your production system to achieve the same results.
    >
    A bad thought here :( , if i create a new index by changing the column positioning say like ( RETAILER, STATUS , EXC) instead of (EXC, RETAILER, STATUS) will oracle fetch it ? or would it help in reducing the cost and cardinatlity of the select query.It's not that easy. There is a lot that goes into the cost calculation, some of that is known (through the great work by Jonathan Lewis and Richard Foote), and some of that is purely internal to Oracle. If you are more interested in the internals Cost-Based Oracle Fundamentals by Jonathan Lewis is a great book.
    HTH!

  • Query with different parameter take different time to execute.

    Hi,
    I am a C/C++ programmer and newbie to database. I find weird case to my company database. oracle 10g.
    I have a query (below). When I set GENRE_ID value to 20, query execution time only take *5* seconds. But when I change to 10, it take *54* seconds! The same query but different values GENRE_ID (20 or 10) -- it also happen to other GENRE_ID values.
    on below query
    WHERE substr(GENRE_ID,0,2) = 10 and GENRE_ID != 10) take 54 seconds
    WHERE substr(GENRE_ID,0,2) = 20 and GENRE_ID != 20) take 5 seconds
    The explain plan give exact same result for both queries.
    I have follow Re: 3. How to  improve the performance of my query? / My query is running slow. for optimizer but the problem still there.
    And we have rebuilt all indexes.
    Anyone can help me? I need any advises for this problem.
    Note:
    Song table only have 570K records and Song_vod table 1100 records.
    Query:
    select *
    from(
    select rownum rowno, a.*
    from(
    select a.SONG_VOD_ID, a.SONG_ID, a.VOD_TITLE, a.ALBUM_ID, a.ARTIST_ID, a.VOD_ISSUE_DATE, a.VOD_ORDER_ISSUE_DATE, a.VOD_ADULT_YN, a.VOD_L_IMG_PATH, a.VOD_M_IMG_PATH, a.VOD_S_IMG_PATH, a.RECOMMEND_CNT, a.OPPOSE_CNT, get_song_name(a.SONG_ID) SONG_NAME, get_album_name(a.ALBUM_ID) ALBUM_NAME, get_artist_name(a.ARTIST_ID) ARTIST_NAME, VOD_ISSUE_DATE vodIssueDate
    from SONG_VOD a inner join SONG b on a.SONG_ID = b.SONG_ID
    where a.LC_STATUS_CD = 'CS0006'
    AND (b.GENRE_ID
    in (
    select GENRE_ID
    from MD_GENRE
    WHERE substr(GENRE_ID,0,2) = 10
    and GENRE_ID != 10)
    OR b.GENRE_ID
    in (
    select GENRE_ID
    from MD_GENRE
    WHERE substr(GENRE_ID,0,2) = '40'
    and GENRE_ID != '40'
    ) order by a.REG_DATE desc, a.SONG_VOD_ID desc
    ) a WHERE rownum <= 0 + 30
    Thank you,
    Regards
    -=Rika Chaniago=-

    907814 wrote:
    I am a C/C++ programmer and newbie to database. I find weird case to my company database. oracle 10g.
    I have a query (below). When I set GENRE_ID value to 20, query execution time only take *5* seconds. But when I change to 10, it take *54* seconds! The same query but different values GENRE_ID (20 or 10) -- it also happen to other GENRE_ID values.This is to be expected. Even an IDENTICAL query can (and often will) have DIFFERENT execution times.
    The typical reason is how fast the query process can get to the data block(s) containing the relevant row(s). Is that data block still on disk and require expensive and slow physical I/O to move it into the buffer cache for use? Is that data block already cached for much faster logical I/O access? If in memory, is there any contention in getting a latch for the chain the data block hangs off from (how hot is that block)? Etc.
    The run-time environment is not static. Thus execution times of queries (called cursors in Oracle) is not static. Execution times are expected to vary.
    Some basics. SQL code is source code. SQL code needs to be parsed and converted into a set of instructions that the server can execute. So it is similar to C/C++. SQL source code needs to be compiled. This executable code in Oracle is called a cursor.
    Like your code, the cursor can be executed with different input variables (bind variables). However, that code would have been compiled using certain assumptions about the data. And that executable code may work fine for some input data, and work not so okay for other input data. As the input parameter values are not not equal. E.g. there are a 1000 rows to process when employee type parameter is "employee" and only 10 rows when it is "manager". The code could have been compiled with the assumption that 10 rows would be the average for all input parameters - the Cost Based Optimiser needs to base its decision on the best execution path for that SQL source code on certain assumptions about the data. These may not always be correct. (usually due incorrect or stale stats about the data)
    Thus you also need to look at what the execution plan is (the URL for which has already been supplied).
    The Oracle® Database Performance Tuning Guide is at http://www.oracle.com/pls/db112/portal.all_books

  • Items in the shopping cart appear with different price than in the catalog

    Hi All,
    We are running SRM 5.0 (Classic Scenario) with external catalogues.
    After selecting items from the external catalogue and transferring them to the shopping cart, the items appear with different price(the problem exists in the productive system)
    The strange thing is that there is no dependence or sequence between the differences. For example, in one shopping cart, one item is with correct price, the price of the other item is not correct (when I click on the icon which is  showing item details in the catalogue, the price is different than the one in the shopping cart). Sometimes the difference is significant, sometimes not - if the item price in the catalogue is 22.34 EUR, in the shopping cart is 21.22EUR or if the item is 45.62EUR in the shopping cart is 45.60 EUR. There is no logic.
    I tried to create a shopping cart in the support system, with the same items from this catalogue, and they are sent back in SRM with the correct prices.
    I traced all OCI parameters, sent from the supplier catalogue, and everything is correct.
    At the example given below the price in the shopping cart ordered in the productive system is 69.00CZK, and after that during the test the correct price of 73.870CZK has appeared.
    NEW_ITEM-DESCRIPTION==Durable-KeyClip-keytag%2C+black
    NEW_ITEM-MATNR==
    NEW_ITEM-MATGROUP==
    NEW_ITEM-QUANTITY==10
    NEW_ITEM-UNIT==EA
    NEW_ITEM-PRICE==73.870
    NEW_ITEM-PRICEUNIT==1
    NEW_ITEM-CURRENCY==CZK
    NEW_ITEM-NEW_ITEM-LEADTIME==1
    NEW_ITEM-VENDOR==
    NEW_ITEM-VENDORMAT==0176%2F1957001
    NEW_ITEM-MANUFACTCODE==
    NEW_ITEM-MANUFACTMAT==
    NEW_ITEM-CONTRACT==
    NEW_ITEM-CONTRACT_ITEM==
    NEW_ITEM-SERVICE==
    NEW_ITEM-EXT_QUOTE_ID==
    NEW_ITEM-EXT_QUOTE_ITEM==
    NEW_ITEM-EXT_PRODUCT_ID==23109
    NEW_ITEM-EXT_SCHEMA_TYPE==UNSPSC
    NEW_ITEM-EXT_CATEGORY_ID==55121504
    NEW_ITEM-LONGTEXT_1%3A132==Durable-KeyClip%0D%0Akeytag%2Cblack%0D%0A%0D%0A6pc
    I checked the error log in SLG1 for BBP_OCI, and no error message exists. In my opinion the problem can be in supplier system, because otherwise all items will be with wrong price. And at the moment, there are shopping carts in which all items are with the correct price!
    It is not something in the user profile, because in one shopping cart created by one user some items are correct, some of them not.
    I also checked with the supplier,  they said that they haven't change the price, recently.
    Has somebody of you met this problem?
    In the IMG-> Define External Web Services (Catalogs, Vendor Lists etc.) I have set all parameters for the standard call structure: the URL of the supplier, our company ID and password for their catalogue.
    In the Detail view for the catalogue, the following parameters are set
    u201CAdditional functions in the product catalogueu201D field:
    -     Display product data again in the catalogue
    -     Validate product data from SAP Enterprise Buyer
    -     Find supply sources
    u201CTechnical Settingsu201D field
    - Use Error Log
    Thanks,
    Desi

    That means that we are not maintaining material numbers in SRM, so there are no predefined price or info records for that materials in R/3 system, or in SRM.
    In the set up of external catalogues, validation of the price is set. Which means that, if a new shopping cart is created from already existing one, and meanwhile, a change of the price is done by the supplier in the catalogue, the new item price will be adopted in the shopping cart.
    No prices are maintained in the SRM system, everything is from the supplier catalogue.
    Desi

  • Query with 'different from' clause in Sqlite

    My question is very simple:
    How can I submit a query with a 'different from' clause into a table.
    In AIR, I would like to query :
    "select * from myTable where myField <> 'value' ";
    but it does'nt work !
    Nor
    "select * from myTable where myField != 'value' ";
    nor
    "select * from myTable where myField is not 'value' ";
    is it impossible to query with a 'different from' clause in Sqlite wih Adobe Air

    Hello,
    SQLite in AIR does support 'different from' and '<>' is the correct operator. Take the following emp table for example:
    id
    name
    age
    1
    A
    26
    2
    B
    30
    3
    C
    28
    If you want to query the records whose name isn't A. The following SQL is correct:
    select * from emp where name <> 'A'
    Thanks,
    Yang

  • Huge difference in Execution time in same Query with different Parameter

    Hi Experts,
    We are facing an unique problem once we are executing the query in HANA SQL prompt. This Query was generated from BObj and executing in HANA system. Once this query running with following condition, it is taking almost 7-00 minute to execute and returning around 924 rows.
    << WHERE
    Table__1."LOGSYS"  IN  ('RKGCLNT102')
    AND
    Table__1."CompanyCode"  IN  ('7240','7245')
    AND
    Table__1."Plant"  IN ……………… >
    However if we run the same query with some different plant, It is taking only 2 second. Please find the Query here.
    << WHERE
    Table__1."LOGSYS"  IN  ('RKGCLNT102')
    AND
    Table__1."CompanyCode"  IN  ('7245','7600')
    AND
    Table__1."Plant"  IN ……………… >
    This is really an unexpected behavior and we are not able to get the actual reason why it is behaving like this.
    Could anyone please help to analyze this issue to fine the root cause.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Satrajit.

    Hi there
    Unfortunately you provided too few information to analyze the issue.
    Maybe the underlying tables have very skew data and the first select has to read a larger share of the base tables.
    Maybe the columns had been unloaded before and the first query had to load them into memory first.
    Is the runtime always bad with the one and always good with the other set of parameters?
    Have you checked the PlanViz for both versions? How do these differ?
    - Lars

  • Simulate query with different user

    Hello all,
    sometimes I receive calls from our user in BW that some query is not running/no authorization, but when i run the query it works, because I have rights to see everything.
    Is there any way to simulate how a query is running under a different user (which has restricted authorization). I want to check e.g  authorization but I do not want to copy existing user to a test user.
    I saw in the TA RSTRACE that I can enetr a different user, but how can I run a query with this user profile.
    Any help/ideas would be great. Thank you in advance.
    Best Regards,
    Stefan from Munich/Germany

    Hello Edwin,
    works perfect. Thank you.
    BR,
    Stefan

  • Query with different currency for different users

    Hi at all,
    just a crazy thing happened. I created a query. Every user gets the result with the currency EURO.
    Only one user here gets the country currency like US$, Francs etc.
    If he logs in on a different PC, he also gets EURO.
    So I think the problem is because of his PC.
    I already checked his user data in SAP and BW.
    And he really uses the same query with the same filters...
    Thanks for helping...
    Kind regards from totally confused Marielle

    Hi,
    Check the Front end Patch levels on both the machines. If they are different, then you can decide what you want to do, either upgrade it on other PCs or not use the one that has it.
    Cheers,
    Kedar

  • How do i sync my iphone with different contact than what i have on my ipod

    how do i sync my new iphone with a different contanct than what i have on my ipod

    See these 2 Links...
    Recovering your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3991
    Syncing to a New Computer...
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3141

  • Referencing component usage with different interfaces

    Hi experts,
    First of, some details;
    - I'm on NW04.
    - I have a generic WDP interface named: IModelComponent
    - I have a specific WDP interface named: IEmployee
    - I have a WDP component implementing both interfaces named: Employee
    Now I want to create some sort of component factory component. In this component I have:
    - defined 'Used Web Dynpro Component' IModelComponent
    - Created a method getComponentUsage (static names just for clearer example):
    wdThis.wdGetIModelComponentComponentUsage().createComponent("x.x.x.org.mdc.empl.EmployeeModelComponent", "x.x/x~org~mdc~employee");
    return wdThis.wdGetIModelComponentComponentUsage();
    Next I have a client view component which refers to the component factory and the employee interface
    - defined 'Used Web Dynpro Component' IEmployee
    - defined 'Used Web Dynpro Component' ComponentFactory
    - On request I call the factory method getComponentUsage
    Now, when I use this component usage the following way:
    wdThis.wdGetIEmployeeComponentUsage.enterReferencingModeUnsafe(receivedComponentUsage);
    Then things work perfectly! This is basically what I want to achieve.
    But the method enterReferencingModeUnsafe is deprecated, so I wonder if there are other, better ways to achieve usage referencing of components with multiple interfaces (create as one interface, use as the other interface).
    Looking forward to any comment.
    Grtz,
    Chris
    Edited by: Chris van de Wouw on Feb 6, 2010 5:20 PM

    Basically solved it myself. I'm now using the actual required component usage (IEmployee) as entry point for the factory, which will create the correct implementation component (based on configuration). For IModelComponent specific methods I can use the getInterfaceController() of the employee component usage class and cast it to the model component interface.

  • Wny does ACR 7.3 open a .JPG with different dimensions than PS 13.0.1 x64?

    I have a .jpg file that opens in Photoshop 13.0.1 x64 as an image with dimensions of 5588 x 4627 pixels. If I set Photoshop to open it in ACR 7.3 it opens with dimensions 4453 x 4418 with the image looking squished horizontally and cropped at the top.
    I captured the image on a Nikon D600. I developed the NEF with DxO Optics Pro 8.1.1 and output a TIFF. I opened the TIFF in Photoshop (without using ACR) and did my editing including  some transformation to create mirrored wrap for a canvas. There are versions saved as PSDs. I resized the image for output and used PS to create a JPG. That JPG causes the strange (to me) behavior when Photoshop tries to open the file.
    I used the same PSD to create multiple JPGs with differing levels of quality (varyiing from 9MB to 27MB). Photoshop exhibits the same behavior on all of them.
    If I process the JPG thruough ACR, the resultant image retains the bad dimensions and distortions.
    The Adobe "chat" preresentative said this was expected behavior in a 2+ hour chat. He/she said that they were able to replicate the different dimensions on their end with their images.
    Does anyone know if this is normal behavior? If so, why?
    Has anyone experienced something similar?
    Thanks,
    Joe
    I am running this on Win7 x64 Home Premium with 8 GB RAM. I also have LR 4.3 installed on the computer and previously used it to process the same NEF file.

    I sent the JPG to a service for a print on canvas. They reported that the image was not the proper size and shape when they opened it in Photoshop. Unfortunately I have not been able to get them to tell me what pixel size it was, just rough inches (!?!?!). So I started trying things in Photoshop and came up with this strange behavior that might explain the problem at the service.

Maybe you are looking for