RAID Options with (3) 1TB drives

Hi Folks,
Setting up a brand new XServe with Snow Leopard. I have (3) 1TB drives, as well as the 128GB SSD for the OS. Can anyone recommend the best configuration for the setup of these 3 drives? Srtiped or Concatenated? RAID 1 or 5?
Thanks in advance,
-andy-

No one can recommend a setup other than yourself, since you're the one that knows what you plan to do with the server. All anyone here can do is tell you the pros and cons of the various options.
First off, RAID 5 requires a hardware RAID card - you can't do RAID 5 in software alone, so unless you also have the RAID card that's not an option.
RAID 0 (striping) gives good performance and results in a volume approximately the same size as all drives combined - so three 1TB drives will yield about 3TB of usable space.
There is no redundancy in RAID 0, though, so if one drive fails all the data is lost because each file is 'striped' in chunks across all drives
A concatenated array is similar except that each drive is just appended to the end of the previous one. It offers the same usable capacity as RAID 0 (e.g. three 1TB drives ≈ 3TB space), but offers lower performance (since you can't parallelize the reads/writes over multiple drives. There's still no redundancy but there is a higher chance of recovery if a drive fails (the data on that drive is gone, but data on the other drives may be recoverable).
RAID 1 mirrors data across multiple (usually 2, but can be more) drives. Data written to disk is written to all drives simultaneously so the loss of one drive doesn't affect availability (the system keeps running off the other drives). Performance is lower than RAID 0, but you gain the redundancy.
Available space is based on the smallest drive in the set, so using any number of 1TB drives in the array will result in a 1TB usable volume.
So that's the back-end. It's up to you to determine which is most appropriate for your setup.
For example, if performance is your primary driver, then striped may be the way to do, as long as you have a viable backup strategy for any data you wanted to keep.
Striping may also be viable if available capacity is your concern - if you need 3TB of space then this is pretty much your only option.
However, if redundancy is your concern, then mirroring seems more appropriate as long as your needs are less than 1TB. It doesn't necessarily make sense to mirror three ways, so maybe you mirror two drives and use the third for backup.
Or maybe you need redundancy and capacity, then maybe you need the hardware RAID card to go RAID 5 (this will yield 2TB usable space, with redundancy to protect against single disk failure).

Similar Messages

  • Trying to setup RAID 1 with new SATA drives on xserve 2009 model

    Trying to setup RAID 1 with new SATA drives on xserve 2009 model
    I have an Xserve rack mount model Xserve 2.26 Quad Core (EMC# 2279) with an Apple RAID card, 24GB RAM (running 10.9 Server software)
    Purchased two Western Digital 1TB SATA III 7200 RPM 64MB Cache Black WD1003FZEX drives
    It came with three 160GB SATA drives.  I'm leaving one of the original 160GB drives for the OS, but I want to replace the 2 other drives and set it up with RAID 1 (mirrored). I bought 2 brand new Western Digital 1TB SATA drives and formatted them on another Mac through Disk Utility with Mac OS Extended (Journaled) formatting.  I then placed the new drives in the Xserve and booted it up.  After I login it immediately gives me 2 error windows saying...
    "Apple RAID Card
    The Apple RAID Card installed in your system requires your attention."
    It has two buttons underneath this message allowing me to either select 'Ignore' or 'Open RAID Utility'
    I've tried to RAID the drives the Disk Utility and through the RAID Utility with no success.
    I have both drives mounted on the desktop, as separate drives, but I really need to set these up as a RAID 1.
    I've been reading other forums, where others have been able to get this to work by using a jumper on certain pins (5 & 6)of the drive to back down the transfer rate to 1.5 Gb per second.  I tried that and it didn't work for me. Maybe I used the wrong pins -- I just don't know.  I'm also wondering if there is some Apple firmware that is required on these drives?  I'm asking for help from anyone who has gone through this same issue.  Thanks in advance.

    UPDATE --  I had an issue with the RAID card battery, it was dead and I have since replaced it.  But I am still unable to setup the RAID 1 drive configuration.  Does anyone know if it has something to do with the faster transfer rates on these new drives.  Maybe they need to be clocked down with certain jumper settings on these Western Digital drives?  Or am I fighting a losing battle because these drives don't have Apple firmware?  Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

  • Creating a mirrored raid set with a hard drive that already has data on it.

    I have a hard drive that I keep my photos on, and want to create a mirrored raid set that includes this drive, with its data, and another drive.  How can I do this without erasing the drive with my photos on them?  I am running 10.7.5 if that matters.
    Thanks for any help.

    Creating a Mirrored RAID reformats the drive and loads a substantial RAID driver and some tables onto it. When completed, the drive is inherently a member of a RAID set, and will continue to be so even if moved to another Mac.
    because of this, you cannot create a RAID directly on a standard drive that contains data already in any reasonable, risk-free way.
    To amplify what The Hatter has said above, Mirrored RAID is not Backup. Mirrored RAID only increases mean time to repair to keep a drive failure from becoming a Data Disaster. You still need a Backup. Mirrored RAID does not protect you from deletions from user error, crazy software, or "just because".
    I run a mirrored RAID in my Home Server, which contains all the Users files for everyone in the Household. And I also recognize (after being burned by it) that Mirrored RAID is helpful, but not a sufficient Backup by itself. I back up the Users Drive automatically to an External drive using Time Machine. [So what I am advising is not just theoretical, I am living what I am advising.]
    With WD Black 1TB  and other very good drives in the under US$100 range, there is really no reason NOT to invest in several drives for such an undertaking.

  • Installing Maverick on a MacPro with OS 10.7.5 and using RAID 1 with 2 * 1TB disks. 50% used.

    I have a MacPro with 2* 1TB disks running Mac OS 10.7.5 using a RAID card running RAID 1. 50% space used.
    How can I install Maverick safely (i have a Time Machine Backup). The install will not use the RAID set as a boot volume.
    Reading the RAID manual there is discribed a way to create a bootabkle partition and RAID 5. But it starts out as a newly purchased configuration.
    I have a used configuration. I would like to reuse the data.
    Is there an installation section for my type of configuration?
    THKS for all help.
    Regards
    Reint

    I have found the answer myself already.
    1.     Take a full backup on a medium which also will restore.
    2.     Start your system with original start-up DVD.
    3.     Start RAID pgm. Dissolve your current RAID set.
    4.     Create a new RAID set with a logical volume on it.
    5.     Restore from your backup your current system.
    6.     Install Maverick on this system.

  • Will Final Cut work with 13 1TB drives daisy chained togerher

    Will Final Cut work with 13 (1TB) Firewire 800 drives daisy chained (78 feet) together? Has any one done this? If so were there any problems?

    Thanks for your advice guys.
    I did run into problems, had to start computer with only my pre-existing SATA and FireWire 800 drives (connected to the back of my Mac), then I made sure the 14 FireWire 800 drives were turned off, attached the FireWire 800 cable to the front of my Mac, turned on the drives from closest to furthest in the drive chain (6'cables between each drive) and all of the drives came up on the desktop.
    When I opened the FCP project that had media associated with the 14 drives I got the spinning wheel of death. After rebooting and restarting the gang of 14 I thought I would try to open one of the drives on the desktop, again the spinning wheel of death. Will move to plan B - 9" cables, plan C is installing the drives into two drive towers.

  • Raid 1 with two external drives

    Hi Everyone,
    I've been searching for some answers on this and havent quite found what ive been looking for so i figured id just ask. I have two identical 1tb g-drives daisy chained and hooked up to my imac via Firewire 800. I want to make one of the drives raid 1 to mirror all the information on the other. What is the best way to go about doing this?
    I was also wondering would it be better just to have time machine do backups of one drive onto the other? any advantages/disadvantages to either method?
    Thanks in advance everyone!
    Cheers,
    Scott

    scotty morrison wrote:
    These drives will be used to store Masters and dailies from photo and video shoots and well as the final edits from those shoots, so id qualify them as "mission critical".
    Instead of "making" your own RAID1 array, you may want to investigate some "turn-key" RAID solutions. For example [this one at Macsales|http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/Mercury-EliteAL-Pro-RAID]. (That's just one RAID1 turn-key unit that Macsales has.)
    Since you mention video, perhaps even consider RAID5 for more capacity, or RAID10 pr RAID0+1 for higher speeds. RAID0 would be good for the edits "scratch space", but not for any "real" storage. Thus the use of RAID10 or 0+1. (If you really want to get the max performance, do some research on the differences between 10 & 0+1.)
    ...Im now thinking however that i should have my masters in raid1 and on separate drives have my live edits being backed up by time machine as they change. Would this be a good thing to do?
    Again, RAID1 is not a backup, so regardless of where you have the "masters", they should be backed up. With the backup, you can then recover from a loss of a drive, it will just be a little more time to get running again compared to RAID1. Thus the "need" for RAID1 is debatable for the masters and final edits, etc.
    Also realize that RAID1 & RAID5 generally have slower performance than an individual drive (or RAID0) due to the overhead of writing the mirror or parity info. In many "workstations", they have a individual drive to boot from, then a RAID0 array for the editing "scratch space", and the final version of the file on some other storage. (i.e.: RAID5 SAN.)
    Be careful with reliance on Time Machine for backups. Time Machine is good, but sometimes Time Machine can't backup files that are in use. (e.g.: [iPhoto|http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4116].) This is true of most backup systems unless you get some really expensive software so for something you're considering "mission critical" like these video files, I'd be looking at an additional backup system. (Even something as lowly as manually copying files to an external hard drive or an Automator workflow.)
    To give another perspective: RAID1 if you absolutely can't have this system down for even one second. Which means your boot drive needs RAID1. Your "scratch space" on RAID0 or a SSD, since you want speed and can deal with the loss of a drive. Your "masters" & "final edits", you need to consider _+long term+_ storage. (a.k.a.: archiving.) The largest hard drives currently are 3TB. Being video, I'm going to guess you'll out grow this quickly. With RAID1, you'd be "stuck" at 3TB until larger hard drives come out...and then you've have to buy two of them...then be "stuck" again. So IMHO you should be looking at a RAID5 system that can grow. They can be "slower" RAID5 since you're looking at long term storage rather than max performance like the scratch disks. (If you need a little more performance, then RAID10, but you'd be sacrificing capacity.) For example, the 8 or 16 drive Drobo. Start with 2 or 3 drives now, then add more drives as needed. Drobo's of this capacity aren't cheap, but if they are as "mission critical" as you think they are, then a Drobo or similar is probably a worthwhile investment. But really, it appears to me that a proper backup procedure of your masters/final edits would be sufficient. RAID1 then is just icing-on-the-cake, albeit, very good icing.

  • Software RAID-1 with two different drives

    Hi,
    I got a 2 TB Seagate Barracuda, which I am looking to mirror in a RAID-1 set-up. Now, since the space is filling rather fast, I suspect I'll have to keep adding disks to this machine in the future. So, I have a interest in changing to some low power (since its always on) drives.
    So, I'm thinking of making the second disk a 2 TB Seagate NAS drive (and then use NAS drives from this point on), which is a fair bit slower than the main drive. Personally, I wouldn't expect this to be a problem at all, but I thought it would be best to check with others first though
    Have anybody here tried running a RAID-1 where one disk is considerably slower than the other? Will this give any issues (other than the speed being limited by the slower disk)?

    WonderWoofy wrote:
    The speed will certainly be limited by the slowest device, as you mentioned, but what I am confused about is what you expect to achieve by continually adding drives to a RAID-1?  At some point, do you plan on changing the RAID level?  Because RAID-1 is mirroring.  If you add another drive, you will not get more space, you will just get another copy of your data... and another... and another.
    I'm not sure that btrfs would be any easier in this case, as the mdadm tools are pretty robust and certainly allow for adding and removing drives.  But if you use btrfs it might actually be beneficial if you are set on keeping a RAID-1 type setup.  This is because btrfs' raid levels are not quite like traditional raid.  If you put your btrfs array in a RAID-1 setup with two disks, it is no different.  But when you add another disk, it will continue to keep just two copies.  So if you have a total of four disks, then it will still be only two copies of any given data, meaning that you will end up with twice the space of the two disk RAID-1.
    Maybe you are thinking of a different RAID level altogether?  If speed is not the issue but you care about redundancy and fault tolerance, then you might want to look into RAID-5 or RAID-6, though these require quite a few disks.
    Ello',
    I'm continuously going to be adding drivers to the machine, not to the same raid-1 array. My plan is once space gets tight, I'll add another disk and bump it up to raid-5

  • MOVED: SATA RAID problems with 890GXM-G65 - Driver not accepted by win7 x64

    This topic has been moved to Windows 64bit.
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=139814.0

    when I attempted installation I have been unplugging the current boot drive.  The first screen I am given after selecting the us / english / keyboard stuff and clicking the "install now" is the screen asking for drivers.
    I know that windows must be recognizing the raid drives because I could continue installation but only if I use the 32 bit drivers and corresponding os version.

  • Best option for RAID 5 with 4 drives?

    I have been thinking about doing a RAID 5 setup with 4 1TB drives.
    My motherboard has enough intel SATA ports to run one through its chipset, but I've heard that can be problematic and wont perform as well.
    What would be the best budget option for a small RAID? Are there any affordable RAID cards out there that would fit my needs? I could probably part with $300 for a card. I'll get 4 WD RE4 drives for the raid.
    I will have a backup of this data so that's not a problem.

    Hi Paul,
    Areca ARC-1320-8i seems like the best option - or a variation of it (like ARC-1320-4i4x) - as long as you get four internal ports.  It's right around $300.
    That said, some of my clients run Intel RST RAID5 on four drives for some time, and it actually performs well:
    (Personally I think software and hybrid RAIDs are the future of RAID technology: much more flexible than hardware RAID; potentially faster as well given that they have access to all of computer resources rather than just a dedicated processor.  The latest iteration of RST, for example, allow SSDs for caching of RAID volumes.)
    For my personal system, I use a $200 CineRAID H458 box with four Hitachi Deskstars in RAID5, which is a very inexpensive option for an external RAID:
    Sure, it's rather slow; fast enough for my purposes though, and is highly portable, unlike any config with an internal RAID controller.
    If I need something seriously faster (yet on a budget), I'd use something like this:

  • I buy the new imac,late 2012 with a hard-drive 3TB and i want to change with another hard-drive 1TB....where i can buy?

    i buy the new imac,late 2012 with a hard-drive 3TB and i want to change with another hard-drive 1TB....where i can buy?

    It's also much more difficult to install third-party hard drives in current or recent Macs than it was. See:
    http://blog.macsales.com/10146-apple-further-restricts-upgrade-options-on-new-im acs
    The 2012 iMacs are also in essence glued together and very difficult to disassemble and reassemble. The bottom line is: don't try it.
    Why, if I may ask, would you want to remove the 3TB drive and replace it with a 1TB drive? What is it you hope to achieve even if it were possible?
    Regards.

  • Boot problems with multiple SATA drives

    I have a PC that I built using a P6N Platinum mobo. I have used it without problems for two years. About 6 months ago I installed a 1Tb SATA drive to act as backup to the original 500Gb SATA drive, and have used it w/o problems until this weekend. I also have 2 SATA DVD drives in the machine. The other day, I had a system freeze that forced me to power down. This resulted in an inability to start Windows. After much work, I have everything up and running thanks to chkdsk. However, I have the strangest problem still. If I keep the second backup HDD connected, I can only boot up in safe mode. Once in safe mode, I can read and write to both HDDs as before. However, if I try to start up in normal mode, BIOS seems to keep putting the backup HDD as the primary boot drive. This hangs the machine! If I disconnect the backup drive, the system boots up fine. Once Windows is running (XP pro) I can reconnect the backup drive, it is seen by the OS, and I can read and write files without problems; I just can't boot up when the second drive is connected.
    I tried some BIOS troubleshooting. I have set the BIOS to use the 500G drive as the primary boot drive, with the 1Tb drive as second or third in boot order. It still won't start Windows. I also set the boot order to omit the 1Tb drive altogether, also with no success. Likewise, I also toggled the "Boot from other device" option, again with no success. The only thing that I noticed was that the boot sector protection was set to disabled. I have not yet tried to enable boot sector protection. The thought of a virus infection comes to mind, but I have been rigorous in using AV software and scans.
    Any advice from board members would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

    Gosh... I must be mixing bags of beans. Not master slave, it is ACHI enabled selection in BIOS.

  • AE with 3 external drives: Partition privacy question

    I have an AE at work today with two 1Tb drives on it, shared via "disk password". I want to add a third drive, partitioned into 3 partitions (management, internal, and general). I've already partitioned it from my MBPro (Mac OS Extended-Journaled) with GUID Partition Table (I'm pretty sure that's what I needed to do).
    When I connect it to the AE, I need to restrict access to the management partition to managers, internal partition to a list of specific users, and then make the remaining partition "open" to anybody who can see the AE (disk password, like the other two whole drives).
    I'd do the experimentation myself, but I can't bring it down to play and experiment right now. I can make any changes needed as long as I schedule the outage.
    It it as simple as
    1) changing the AE setting for Disks --> File Sharing setting for "Secure shared disks" from "Use Disk Password" to "With accounts",
    2) Adding all users in my network to the accounts list
    3) Add them appropriately to the two existing drives, and the third 3-partition drive?
    TIA for any insight/tips,
    Steve

    <BUMP>

  • To add a 6 TB G-Raid (Mac os extended) ext drive to a 2Tb time capsule, using a powered usb with the TC usb port. Using the airport utility 5.6 on iMAC (10.7.3). Went to manual setup,then disk. Have options of the TC

    Want to add a 6 TB G-Raid (Mac os extended) ext drive to a 2Tb time capsule, using a powered usb with the TC usb port. Using the airport utility 5.6 on iMAC (10.7.3). Went to manual setup,then disk. Have options of the TC or 6TB. Won't allow update to the 6TB

    4Buck5 wrote:
    Want to add a 6 TB G-Raid (Mac os extended) ext drive to a 2Tb time capsule, using a powered usb with the TC usb port. Using the airport utility 5.6 on iMAC (10.7.3). Went to manual setup,then disk. Have options of the TC or 6TB. Won't allow update to the 6TB
    I am not 100% what isn't allowed.. but I am assuming you want to spread the backup across the two disks.. internal TC and 6TB external.. this is not possible.. It has to be one or the other. TC has no way to build a raid JBOD or anything else. Nor would you want to as that is the most likely to fail and kill your data.
    Let me add, backing up 6TB over USB on TC.. will be the most excruciating experience of your life.. cf child birth or passing kidney stones.. large ones.. being the male equivalent.

  • Internal RAID 0 with 3 or 2 Drives

    Hello, iv been snooping around the forums looking for info on various internal RAID set ups...
    I do a lot of editing with FCP but a do a lot of complicated After Effects stuff too.
    I am considering the following...
    set up 1
    3x 1TB drives, RAID 0
    vs.
    set up 2
    2x 1TB drives, in a RAID 0
    with the other bay used as a render drive.
    my question is, with a three drive RAID 0 would my read and write times be faster or slower than a 2 drive Media drive and one drive dedicated to writing for rendering...
    any shared experience would greatly be appreciated, or suggestions...
    thanks
    also i was considering the WD caviar Black drives, any good or bad expeirence with those?

    Thanks for the links. i am considering this option...
    sdd in the lower drive bay.
    and some kind of raid with the other 4 bays... id like to do a raid 5 internally. is that possible without a controller, or how would i go about doing that?
    i also had one other question...
    i was thinking about getting this external LaCie 1 Tb rugged drive for my itunes, iphoto, you know things that do not have to do with current work, maybe finished projects(not project files but final renders), other private stuff.
    my question is, would a 5400 rpm drive be fast enough for such tasks. like playing an uncompressed quicktime... the drive is only like 120 euros with esata and usb 2, but its only 5400 rpm. i like the OWC drives from the links you gave me, but i live in Berlin germany, and it would kind of be a hassel to ship all these drives... but i am going to the USA in like 3 months so i could wait if i need to...
    any suggestions?

  • Installing Solaris 10 on X2100 with 1TB drive

    I am trying to install the latest Solaris 10 (X86) on an Sun X2100. The installation fires up fine until it tries to set up the hard drive and then it fails with the following error message:
    FILE SYSTEM CREATION FAILED
    COULD NOT CHECK OR CREATRE SYSTEM CRITICAL FILE SYSTEMS
    The installation then stops and I go to the shell. The drive in the machine is a 1TB Western Digital SATA. Has anyone ever run into this problem or know a way to troubleshoot this? I have 10 machines that I need to configure. One would think that Solaris would easily install on a Sun box.
    Thanks for any help!

    They have an onboard RAID controller but when I looked at the BIOS setting it is not enabled to use RAID. I have 2 1TB drives in the machine and the install throughs the error I mentioned above. It appears to have partitioned the disk and set up the slices though. I know this because I can swap the drives and look at the backup drive after the install fails via format and it looks like it has the correct label on it and it.
    Thanks for any help!

Maybe you are looking for