Rank function on Union reports

Hi All,
I have a requirement where i have 2 reports the first report is a single and simple report where i have to show top 10 countries based on a measure value and it should have a section break on country which i have achieved the same using a rank function.
Another report which has got 20 union reports but rank function is not working the same way as a single and simple report, i couldn't get any possible solution for this. Any pointers would be much appreciated
Regards
Pavan

Hi srini,
I did not get you, what exactly you mean keeping the rank in outer query? i have used rank function in each of the 20 union reports.

Similar Messages

  • Error using Rank function in Answers

    Hi All,
    Am trying to generate a report in Answers which lists Top Accounts with Revenue.
    I Ranked the Revenue field and it is returning me correct values. ( Rank(account.revenue) )
    But, when I try to filter on this field and restrict the rows which shows only top 10 Accounts, it is returning the following error:
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 17001] Oracle Error code: 1792, message: ORA-01792: maximum number of columns in a table or view is 1000 at OCI call OCIStmtExecute. [nQSError: 17010] SQL statement preparation failed. (HY000)
    Can any one help me on this.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Imtiaz.

    Hi Joe,
    This is the Physical query generated when I use Rank function and the report is fine.
    select distinct D1.c1 as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c4 as c4,
    D1.c5 as c5,
    D1.c6 as c6,
    D1.c7 as c7,
    D1.c8 as c8,
    D1.c9 as c9,
    D1.c10 as c10,
    D1.c11 as c11,
    D1.c12 as c12,
    D1.c13 as c13,
    D1.c14 as c14,
    D1.c15 as c15
    from
    (select D1.c1 as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c4 as c4,
    D1.c5 as c5,
    D1.c6 as c6,
    D1.c7 as c7,
    D1.c8 as c8,
    D1.c9 as c9,
    D1.c10 as c10,
    D1.c11 as c11,
    D1.c12 as c12,
    D1.c13 as c13,
    D1.c14 as c14,
    D1.c15 as c15
    from
    (select Case when D1.c1 is not null then Rank() OVER ( ORDER BY D1.c1 DESC NULLS LAST ) end as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c1 as c4,
    D1.c4 as c5,
    D1.c5 as c6,
    D1.c6 as c7,
    D1.c7 as c8,
    D1.c8 as c9,
    D1.c9 as c10,
    D1.c10 as c11,
    D1.c11 as c12,
    D1.c12 as c13,
    D1.c13 as c14,
    D1.c14 as c15,
    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY D1.c1, D1.c2, D1.c3, D1.c4, D1.c5, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c8, D1.c9, D1.c10, D1.c11, D1.c12, D1.c13, D1.c14 ORDER BY D1.c1 ASC, D1.c2 ASC, D1.c3 ASC, D1.c4 ASC, D1.c5 ASC, D1.c6 ASC, D1.c7 ASC, D1.c8 ASC, D1.c9 ASC, D1.c10 ASC, D1.c11 ASC, D1.c12 ASC, D1.c13 ASC, D1.c14 ASC) as c16
    from
    (select distinct T690.SUM_REVN_AMT as c1,
    T690.NAME as c2,
    T2216.NAME as c3,
    T690.X_PETROFAC_REVN as c4,
    T690.SUM_WIN_PROB as c5,
    T690.X_PERCENT_GET as c6,
    T690.SUM_WIN_PROB * T690.X_PERCENT_GET / nullif( 100, 0) as c7,
    T690.X_EC_PRIORITY as c8,
    T19028.LOGIN as c9,
    T690.X_COUNTRY as c10,
    T690.X_REGION as c11,
    T18311.NAME as c12,
    T18641.NAME as c13,
    T18238.NAME as c14
    from
    SIEBEL.S_BU T18238 left outer join (
    SIEBEL.S_USER T19028 left outer join (
    SIEBEL.S_OPTY T690 left outer join SIEBEL.S_STG T2216 On T690.CURR_STG_ID = T2216.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T1189 On T690.PR_DEPT_OU_ID = T1189.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18311 /* Competitor */ On T690.PR_CMPT_OU_ID = T18311.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18641 /* Partner */ On T690.PR_PRTNR_ID = T18641.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_POSTN T19114 On T690.PR_POSTN_ID = T19114.PAR_ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_OPTY_BU T18280 On T690.ROW_ID = T18280.OPTY_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_OPTY_X T19415 On T690.ROW_ID = T19415.PAR_ROW_ID) On T19028.PAR_ROW_ID = T19114.PR_EMP_ID) On T18238.ROW_ID = T18280.BU_ID
    ) D1
    ) D1
    where ( D1.c16 = 1 )
    ) D1
    order by c1 desc
    But When I apply Filter on this Rank column then it gives me the error. THis is the Physical query for that
    select distinct Case when D1.c1 is not null then Rank() OVER ( ORDER BY D1.c1 DESC NULLS LAST ) end as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c1 as c4,
    D1.c4 as c5,
    D1.c5 as c6,
    D1.c6 as c7,
    D1.c7 as c8,
    D1.c8 as c9,
    D1.c9 as c10,
    D1.c10 as c11,
    D1.c11 as c12,
    D1.c12 as c13,
    D1.c13 as c14,
    D1.c14 as c15
    from
    (select D1.c1 as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c4 as c4,
    D1.c5 as c5,
    D1.c6 as c6,
    D1.c7 as c7,
    D1.c8 as c8,
    D1.c9 as c9,
    D1.c10 as c10,
    D1.c11 as c11,
    D1.c12 as c12,
    D1.c13 as c13,
    D1.c14 as c14
    from
    (select T690.SUM_REVN_AMT as c1,
    T690.NAME as c2,
    T2216.NAME as c3,
    T690.X_PETROFAC_REVN as c4,
    T690.SUM_WIN_PROB as c5,
    T690.X_PERCENT_GET as c6,
    T690.SUM_WIN_PROB * T690.X_PERCENT_GET / nullif( 100, 0) as c7,
    T690.X_EC_PRIORITY as c8,
    T19028.LOGIN as c9,
    T690.X_COUNTRY as c10,
    T690.X_REGION as c11,
    T18311.NAME as c12,
    T18641.NAME as c13,
    T18238.NAME as c14,
    Case when T690.SUM_REVN_AMT is not null then Rank() OVER ( ORDER BY T690.SUM_REVN_AMT DESC NULLS LAST ) end as c15
    from
    SIEBEL.S_BU T18238 left outer join (
    SIEBEL.S_USER T19028 left outer join (
    SIEBEL.S_OPTY T690 left outer join SIEBEL.S_STG T2216 On T690.CURR_STG_ID = T2216.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T1189 On T690.PR_DEPT_OU_ID = T1189.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18311 /* Competitor */ On T690.PR_CMPT_OU_ID = T18311.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18641 /* Partner */ On T690.PR_PRTNR_ID = T18641.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_POSTN T19114 On T690.PR_POSTN_ID = T19114.PAR_ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_OPTY_BU T18280 On T690.ROW_ID = T18280.OPTY_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_OPTY_X T19415 On T690.ROW_ID = T19415.PAR_ROW_ID) On T19028.PAR_ROW_ID = T19114.PR_EMP_ID) On T18238.ROW_ID = T18280.BU_ID
    ) D1
    where ( D1.c15 <= 10 )
    ) D1
    order by c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7, c8, c9, c10, c11, c12, c13, c14, c15
    Thanks,
    Imtiaz

  • Rank function breaks drill down 11g

    I have a simple drill down report standard hierarchy and am having a weird issue with the rank function.
    This report works on 10g but the upgraded 11g version does not.
    When I drill down past the 2nd level it adds an is null filter to the revenue column.  This is also the column we are using to base our rank function.
    If I move the rank column to the first or last position in the table the drills work perfectly.  If I move it to the second column it breaks on the first drill instead of the 2nd.
    It works perfectly if drilling on the headings instead of the values.  That seems to point to some sort of null coming through when being passed.  I've tried using an ifnull and a case statement and neither method works, it just applies the is null filter to the entire column formula.
    The client doesn't want to change the position of the rank column so that work around will not do.  Any ideas?

    A similar thread was recently talked about here:
    In OBIEE charts, how do you make drill downs work on custom formulas?
    With a calculated column, you need to make sure the source query and destination query have the EXACT same formula and the same name for the field. If it is not 100% identical, it may not work correctly. (I typically use the NAVIGATE function to get to the second query rather than the Drill function.)
    Now in some cases, if you try to create a second drill down query with more details in it, the original formula doesn't work the way you want it to. The calculated formulas have to make sense in both source query and destination query in order to work properly. If you have a ranking of the Top 5 Products in the source query, the destination query also has to have the same ranking of Top 5 products in order to work. If you add more fields into the destination query (e.g., adding on product attributes, or # of records associated with that product name etc.), then sometimes the ranking / aggregation in the destination doesn't add up the same way. This causes the system to think that the formulas are different and prevents the drill down.
    I managed to get around this by having a 3rd query in between the original summary view and the detailed data view. So the sequence would be (for example):
    - Dashboard based summary query (including the calculated ranked product names formula)
    - drill down into virtually identical query (add on one slight bit of difference here, for example adding on a second Product Name field ... not a calculated version, but the actual name). Create a drill down this time by clicking on the regular Product Name field (don't drill down on the custom formula)
    - final detailed drill-down query
    You can format this intermediary drill down query to explain to users that they need to click a second time.
    It's not ideal, but it should work. Hope this helps.
    Ted

  • Rank function without filter in the report

    Hi,
    I have a problem with Rank() function. The problem is the next one.
    I have a table with this rows:
    User | DATE | Cost
    user1 | 12/02/2011 | 10,4
    user1 | 13/02/2011 | 11,1
    user1 | 13/02/2011 | 10,1
    user1 | 13/02/2011 | 8,1
    user2 | 12/02/2011 | 1,4
    user2 | 13/02/2011 | 12,1
    user2 | 13/02/2011 | 22,1
    user2 | 13/02/2011 | 8,1
    In the rpd I have a agregate row as SUM(COST), and I need extract te ranking of this SUM(COST) per user, The sum of user1 is 39,7 and the sum of the user 2 is 43,7. If I show in the report all users, the ranking is correct Rank=1 per user2 and Rank=2 per user1, but the problem is that I only want show the user1, when I add a filter to the report user='user1' the ranking value changes from 2 to 1. I need that the ranking value doesn´t change when I introduce a filter.
    Any idea about how to solve this problem?
    Thanks

    Hi Antonio,
    On the Rank column in the answers edit the formula as given below.
    Case when username = 'user2' then Rank(sum(cost)) else 0 end
    Then apply a filter on the Rank column as Rank > 0.
    I hope this one helps you.
    Regards
    AP

  • Reporting-Top 10 and Rank() function

    Need to modify Top 10 Opportunities Pre-defined analysis report. In doing so, we loose the drop down Fiscal Qtr/Year. The only option is to create a Pivot table, and use Fiscal Qtr/Year as a selector. The issue is that I need to be able to retrieve the Top 10 for every Quarter/Year. What is happening now is that the report is pulling Top 10 Opportunities for the entire report, and when we select the Fiscal Quarter/Year, if a Top 10 Opportunities exists, it will return a record(s). If not, it returns 0. Need Top 10 for every quarter.
    The Rank function is used. How do I achieve this using this functionality?
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    Following information might be helpful in resolving the issue.
    General Syntax of Ranking :
    Rank( measure; (dimensions); [Top|Bottom])
    Here is the work flow with an example :- (use efashion universe )
    1) Create a webi report selecting objects quarter, year, sales revenue and create a cross tab
    2) While creating a cross tab, use the Object Year in columns and object Quarter for rows.
    3)Define a variable Var1 = Rank ([Sales Revenue] ; [Quarter]; [Year]) ForEach ([Year])
    4) Insert a blank column next to year in the cross tab.
    5) Drag and drop the variable Var1 in the new blank column inserted next to Object Year..
    You will now find that you have ranking for the years 2001, 2002, 2003 being reflected
    independently.
    Regards,
    Sarbhjeet Kaur

  • Aggregate Function in Union All Reports

    Hi All,
    I am using a union report and in first report
    1. Month/Year - Pending Count
    2. Month/Year - Active Count
    Now I want an average line graph(Total Active Count/Num of Months) for the active count.
    Is it possible to generate it based on result columns ??
    If I create reports using zeros for one of the calculation which are of the format
    Jan 2010 - 10 - 0
    Jan 2010 - 0 - 5
    Both values don't get aggregated with line bar chart and it picks only one of them.
    If I create reports using status as one of the column,
    Jan 2010 - 'Pending' - 10
    Jan 2010 - 'Active' - 5
    This is OK for bars but where do I calculate average is the problem and 2 lines appear on the chart instead of one average line.
    Is there any way to calculate average in this scenario ?
    Appreciate any pointers.
    Thanks
    SM

    Try the below querySELECT P1.projectID,p1.QuoteDate, Q1.QuoteCode,p1.*
    FROM PROJECT P1 inner join (SELECT Q.ProjectID,Max(Q.QuoteDate) QD FROM QUOTE Q group by Q.ProjectID) Q1 on Q1.ProjectID = P1.ProjectID and Q1.QD=P1.QuoteDate-Prashanth

  • How to use RANK function ?

    Hello everyone,
    here is the query I run in sql developer using RANKFunction.
    SELECT Empno, Ename, Job, Mgr, Hiredate, Sal
    FROM
    (SELECT Empno, Ename, Job, Mgr, Hiredate, Sal,
    *RANK*() OVER
    (ORDER BY SAL Desc NULLS LAST) AS Emp_Rank
    FROM Emp
    ORDER BY SAL Desc NULLS LAST)
    WHERE Emp_Rank < 6;How I can use this query in my report in obiee or is there any replacement of RANK() function in obiee so that I can use that to get my same above result.
    Thanks

    Kuldip wrote:
    Thanks, you are absolutely correct. However, By doing this I am getting my output as whic I was not expecting.
    Students Marks Rank
    student1 95 1
    student2 95 1
    student3 93 3
    student4 93 3
    student5 91 5
    The output should be as instead
    Students Marks Rank
    student1 95 1
    student2 95 1
    student3 93 2
    student4 93 2
    student5 91 3
    Can It be done like this ?
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Kuldip on Mar 15, 2012 11:51 PMHi Boss,
    I think you copied the above scenario from this site..
    http://oracle-bi.siebelunleashed.com/articles/rank-and-dense-rank-functionsobiee/
    Then why asking how to do this? Are you testing us? Doesn't that site say how to achieve this?

  • Rank Function taking a long time to execute in SAP HANA

    Hi All,
    I have a couple of reports with rank function which is timing out/ or taking a really long time to execute, Is there any way to get the result in less time when rank functions are involved?
    the following is a sample of how the Query looks,
    SQL 1:
    select      a.column1,
                    b.column1,
                    rank () over(partition by a.column1 order by sum(b.column2) asc)
    from         "_SYS_BIC"."Analyticview1"         b
                    join          "Table1"            a
                      on          (a.column2 = b.column3)
    group by  a.column1,
    b.column1;
    SQL 2:
    select    a.column1,
                    b.column1,
                    rank () over( order by min(b.column1) asc) WJXBFS1
    from         "_SYS_BIC"."Analytic view2"         b
                    cross join                "Table 2"               a
    where      (a.column2  like '%a%'
    and b.column1  between 100 and 200)
    group by  a.column1,
                    b.column1
    when I visualize the execution plan,the rank function is the one taking up a longer time frame. so I executed the same SQL without the rank() or partition or order by(only with Sum() in SQL1 and Min() in SQL 2) even that took a around an hour to get the result.
    1.Does anyone have an any idea to make these queries to execute faster?
    2. Does the latency have anything to do with the rank function or could it be size of the result set?
    3. is there any workaround to implement these rank function/partition inside the Analytic view itself? if yes, will this make it give the result faster?
    Thank you for your help!!
    -Gayathri

    Krishna,
    I tried both of them, Graphical and CE function,
    It is also taking a long time to execute
    Graphical view giving me the following error after 2 hr and 36 minutes
    Could not execute 'SELECT ORDER_ID,ITEM_ID,RANK from "_SYS_BIC"."EMMAPERF/ORDER_FACT_HANA_CV" group by ...' in 2:36:23.411 hours .
    SAP DBTech JDBC: [2048]: column store error: search table error:  [2620] executor: plan operation failed
    CE function - I aborted after 40 mins
    Do you know the syntax to declare local variable to use in CE function?

  • RANK Function in AIX vs Windows

    I am facing an issue where when I run my report using my windows machine I am able to get the right results with the RANK function. However, when I ran the same report in my AIX machine, I got the following error:
    Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
    Error Details
    Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
    State: HY000. Code: 378077472. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 46008] Internal error: File server/Query/Optimizer/ServiceInterfaceMgr/Src/SQOIGeneratorBuiltIn.cpp, line 3403. (HY000)
    If anyone has run into this, please let me know.
    Thanks.

    One point to make is the Rank function works if you create 1 column with the RANK function in Answers(i.e. Rank(Fact.Sales) ). The issue comes up when you try to create a BIN column to bucket the RANKs in a seperate column.
    Here's the SQL:
    SELECT Location.Location saw_0, case WHEN RANK(Metrics.Sales) BETWEEN 1 AND 5 then '1-5' WHEN RANK(Metrics.Sales) BETWEEN 5 AND 10 then '5-10' else 'other' end saw_1, Metrics.Sales saw_2, RANK(Metrics.Sales) saw_3 FROM "Rank Prototype" ORDER BY saw_0
    So Basically, the issue is when you have a Bucketed Rank Sales Column and a simple Rank Column in the same request. (In AIX the issue exists, in Windows there is no issue.)

  • Cummulative total and rank function

    Hi,
    I'm using Discoverer 3.1.36 and wondering if there is a way to
    get cumulative totals with Discoverer and how
    For i.e
    column A      column B      column C
         AB          50          50
         BC          100          150
         MB          70          220
    Also how to create the report that will show only top X values
    and has rank column too
    For i.e
    Rank     Column A
    1 50
    2 30
    3 15

    try importing your own sql statement for using the rank
    function. you may have to export sql first (to create the sql
    file), then edit it and import it.
    to get rank, you can try something like this:
    SELECT "User Name", "Number of whtvr"
    FROM
    (SELECT t1.username "User Name", COUNT(*) "Number of whtvr",
    RANK() OVER (ORDER BY COUNT(*) DESC nulls last) rank
    FROM table1 t1, table2 t2
    WHERE t1.userid=t2.userid
    AND t1.date BETWEEN t2.start_date AND t2.end_date
    GROUP BY t1.username)
    WHERE rank <= 10
    ORDER BY "Number of whtvr" DESC;
    try adding another column to assign a number to each row for the
    rank, maybe a sequence generated number, if a rank column (from
    the subquery) doesn't work.

  • Drill Through on a Union Report

    Hi All,
    I have a report which is a union of similar requests . So the final report is a Code with amount ( the code name is derived from the union of 2 columns from 2 different tables). I am tryinbg to give a drill through on the amount to a detail report. Is there anyway i can pass the Code name to the detail report since its a union report.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Drill through is not possible on the Union reports. To achieve the drill through functionality you have to create the logical column in the BMM layer and use the logical column in the presentation instead of making a union in the presentation. If you use the logical column from the BMM layer you can use the drill through function.

  • Creating Union Report using 3 different reports in OBIEE 11.1.1.5.0

    Hi Gurus,
    This is my first time where I am creating a union report, I have a urgent requirement to create a union report using 3 different reports and it has 3 common dimension columns and each report has 3 measures and a measure label, and 1st report measures has to show $ amounts with column names ,2nd report measures has to show % with column names and 3rd units with column names, the result should be in pivot with all columns and measures ,can someone please help me with steps to approach,I am really confusing with the results when i tried, I really appreciate your inputs.
    Thanks
    KP

    Addendum: I've tried it with CSV instead of XLS. Again, the repository appears to work just fine, but in Answers I get this message, similar to the Excel error:
    Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
    Error Details
    Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 16001] ODBC error state: IM006 code: 0 message: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Driver's SQLSetConnectAttr failed. [nQSError: 16001] ODBC error state: S1009 code: -1023 message: [Microsoft][ODBC Text Driver] '(unknown)' is not a valid path. Make sure that the path name is spelled correctly and that you are connected to the server on which the file resides.. (HY000)

  • ORA-06502 while running a function in a report

    Hi guys,
    I am having a problem executing this function in my report to get the beg balance for my statment.
    any idea as why -- the error I am getting is ORA-06502
    Thanks
    =========================================================
    function CF_OPNE_BALFormula return Number is
    v_bal number;
    v_date date;
    v_prv_period number;
    BEGIN
    v_date := to_char(:P_date_from,'RRRRMM');
    if substr(v_date,5,2) = '01' then
    v_prv_period := to_number(substr(v_date,1,4)-1 ||'13');
    else
    v_prv_period := to_number(add_months(last_day(v_date),-1));
    end if;
    v_bal := csh_acc_pkg.csh_get_acc_bal(:p_own_id,:P_GLA_acc_num,to_char(v_prv_period,'RRRRMM'),'F','ACC');
    return(v_bal);
    EXCEPTION
    WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN RETURN(0);
    END;
    =========================================================

    this might help:
    you have declared v_date as a date, yet you put a string into it. I believe you want it to be a string, since you use SUBSTR to determine the action required.
    So change the declaration to
    v_date varchar2( 6 )
    Furthermore the line
    v_prv_period := to_number(substr(v_date,1,4)-1 ||'13');
    has some problems, I believe.
    substr( v_date, 1, 4 )
    returns a string. You cannot calculate numbers with strings, so re-write the line:
    v_prv_period := to_number(to_number(substr(v_date,1,4)-1 ) ||'13');
    finally:
    to_char(v_prv_period,'RRRRMM')
    isn't right either, I think
    RRRRMM is a date format, whereas v_prv_period is a number.
    Oracle implicitly converts number values to strings when you assign them to a character variable, so this could be a way to call your procedure:
    v_bal := csh_acc_pkg.csh_get_acc_bal(
    :p_own_id
    , :P_GLA_acc_num
    , v_prv_period
    , 'F'
    , 'ACC' );
    Good Luck!

  • OBIEE 11g Union Report Issue

    Hi all,
    Did one any of you started development work on 11g? If so have you created Union reports in 11g?
    I am facing two issues afte creating Union reports.
    1.I am unable to sort the columns. (Report is automatically sorted according to alphabatical order)
    2. I am unable to create New calculation Item.
    Thanks

    Hi there. Does anybody noticed this issue on calendars?! That only occurs when the month is october....
    Just updating, the correct version of OBIEE is 11.1.1.5.0.
    Thanks in advance.
    Marcos

  • Union report in obiee 11g problem

    HI,
        I build union report in obiee 11g.In that report i have one column i.e Financial month.I have excluded Financial month column in table view.
        Now my requirement is I have to show results based Financial month at dashboard.For example if i select particular month in dashboard prompt,that month data has to reflect on dashboard.
        For getting results I created one dashboard prompt i.e Financial month and kept 'is prompted' at report level.But am not getting results means if i select any value from Financial month prompt then the report on         dashboard will not reflect.Please help me how to get data based on Financial month.
    Regards,
    Kumar.

    Hi,
    you said about writing query in DB.......whether U meant of trying checking the query in toad..or something else..........
    Since im giving only one join from dim to fact in the physical diagram........
    But more than one join exist between those dim and fact, but im giving only one join mainly the primary key column of the dimension table to the fact table....Whether i need to give all the joins that exist(even if it has 2 or 3 joins between those fact and dim) tables....
    If i give count distinct means it is giving count for every nation as 1....like i mentioned below
    NATIONALITY<----------------------------------------------------->NATION COUNT
    INDIA---------------------------------------------------------------------1
    AUS------------------------------------------------------------------------1
    CAN------------------------------------------------------------------------1
    Since you said to check about depts of the particular column....i couldn't able to understand about "depts" that you meant????
    Whether i made any logical mistake...........
    thanks,
    Harry...
    Edited by: HariPrasad on Oct 10, 2010 9:55 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Index.htm will NOT upload . . .  desperate : /

    This is my own site which I've run for 3 years. Same computer, same program, didn't touch site set up, firewalls or anything. This morning I make a few quick text changes to the homepage and the file will not upload. It has in fact wiped out my entir

  • How do i install lexmark X1250 on a imac

    how do i install lexmark X1250 on a imac

  • Empty Segment handling  in XSLT

    Hi All,   I have a strange requirement as below    --> PI is getting data from R3 system by ABAP proxy and the whole XML proxy structure should be mapped to one of the target field (SOAP call). i have done this by using XSLT mapping and everything is

  • Small web site question :(

    Hello.... I got the DW CS3 trial, and I have a question: I made my site, but there's a problem. When I go to www."mysite".com, it shows my newer index page. when I go to "mysite".com with out the "www." it goes to my older one. I can't even find the

  • What settings we need to check in PS module while creating the new plant.

    Dear Friends, If we extending the new plant what all the things that we need to check in Project systems module, what all the configuration that needs to performed. Here we are using the Standard Project structure to creating the projects. But it is