Re: Data Modeler: Slow responsiveness with large Models

I am using V3.3, and I still experience the similar performance problem with large models. Even for small models, if I leave the modeler to run for a long time, it becomes slower and slower over time. Last night, left the it to run a synch with the dictionary, and this morning, the program pretty much stopped responding and running ( indicated by 0% CPU). I am not sure if the synch was done. After I tried a few times of resizing and waited for long time, it displayed the menu. So I clicked on Save, then again it hung and never complete the save. Took forever to complete the repaint of screen. Seems have some memory leaking problem. Is Oracle aware this kind of issue? What is the largest model that Oracle tested on the release of SQL Data Modeler?

Hi,
you can try this Re: Memory Problem with Big Model
Philip

Similar Messages

Will a charger for a model 1280 work with my model A1278?

Will a charger for a model 1280 work with my model A1278? Will any L tip 60w work?

Many thanks for your help.

Oracle Data Modeling tool interoperability with QDesigner models.

Hello,
Would it be possible to get some information on how Oracle SQL Developer Data Modeler works with models from other data modeling tools such as QDesigner.
How can Quest QDesigner read the .cdm (conceptual data models) and the .pdm (physical data models) from QDesigner.
Regards,
Mary

SQL Developer Data Modeler does not work with QDesigner models.
Sue

Prob with Adaptive Web Service Model and Response with reference of itself

Hi guys,
I am facing a problem with the Adaptive WebService Model. I have a WebService which is working properly in a Servlet and also in the web service navigator,
The webService has a method let´s say create(objectDTO). The structure of objectDTO is like this:
propertieA
propertieB
propertieC
propertieChildObjectDTO
So I can pass a list of objectDTOs to the webService. If i import the webService the structure in the model looks fine, but if i want to map it to any context, only the properties A-C are mapped. propertieChildObjectDTO is not mapped.
Has anyone a clue on how to solve this problem ? I just tried to add and initialize the propertieChildObjectDTO manually but I got a NullPointerException.
I would appreciate your help.
Happy new year guys
Regards
Flo

Guys......
seems like i can´t reach my requirement with Adaptive Web Service Model:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/wdjava/faq%252b-%252bmodels%252b-%252badaptive%252bweb%252bservice
Now I want to make it by hand. How can I import the regarding EJB ?
Thanks !
Flo

JTree scrollPathToVisible with large model

Hi all,
I use method scrollPathToVisible but the tree do not expand and scroll to the path if the model is large ( > 20000 node of custom TreeModel). I also tried makeVisible but it didnt work neither.
Any one ever had this problem and how to fix it ?
Thanks,
Atipon Pongpat

I'm facing the same problem here. I've been searching the web for hours for a solution.
I solved it by calling scrollPathToVisible() or scrollRowToVisible() twice/multiple times.
This helped in my case, though I don't know why.
But maybe it's a workaround for you too until a better solution is available.
Regards,Ren�

Slow connection with WRT160Nv2 model router

someone help please...I am having slow to intermittent connection when router is hooked up...when hooked directly to modem speed and connection is fine..no problems when changing websites or pages...but with router hooked up, I sometimes get a very slow connection or the computer doesn't detect internet connection & goes into the diagnose connection program...which somtimes doesn't detect any connection issue when run and the computer connects to internet then or tell me to power cycle modem and router then try to connect which works...and the connection will be good for a bit then does this all over again...very frustrating...is their a setting in the router or what do I need to do to fix this issue?

Check this link to upgade or reflash the router's firmware.

Slow Performance with large library (PC)

I've been reading many posts about slow performance but didn't see anything addressing this issue:
I have some 40000 photos in my catalog and despite generating previews for a group of directories, LR still is very slow in scrolling through the pics in these directories.
When I take 2000 of these pics and import them into a new catalog - again generating previews, the scroll through the pics happens much much faster.
So is there some upper limit of recommended catalog size for acceptable performance?
Do I need to split my pics up by year? Seems counter productive, but the only way to see the pics at an acceptable speed.

I also have serious performance issues, and i don´t even have a large database catalog, only around 2.000 pictures, the db file itself is only 75 mb big. Done optimization - didn´t help. What i encountered is that the cpu usage of LR 1.1 goes up and STAYS up around 85% for 4-5 minutes after programm start - during that time, zooming in to an image can take 2-3 minutes! After 4-5 minutes, cpu usage drops to 0%, the background task (whatever LR does during that time!) has finished and i can work very smoothly. preview generation cannot be the problem, since it also happens when i´m working in a folder that already has all previews build, close LR, and start again instantly. LR loads and AGAIN i´ll have to wait 4-5 minutes untill cpu ussage has dropped so i can continue working with my images smoothly.
This is very annoying! I will stop using LR and go back to bridge/acr/ps, this is MUCH much faster. BUMMER!

Render Queue Slows Down with Large Queue

I recently bought a 2014 Mac Pro for the specific purpose of rendering large volumes of After Effects Compositions.
I am rendering approximately 40,000 After Effects Compositions - the reason being that I am using an After Effects Script to create personalised videos from a CSV file.
I've segmented the list into batches of around 1,000 at a time and each film is 1m25s long. I am also using the Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (OpenCL). The videos are added from After Effects into AME.
The Problem
When I start the render, it churns them out at about 3 minutes per video. If I leave it for more than around 9 hours, the render time dramatically slows down. After leaving it for more than 24 hours (a weekend) I've seen render times of around an hour per composition.
Question
Is there a way to stop the queue from slowing down?

I've noticed it with more than 40+ objects in the Queue as well. Now I just save the Queue and stop and exit and re-open if it looks like it's slowing down. Mind you this is a 4Ghz Hex core, 64GB Ram and Quadro 5000 + Tesla C2075 so I know it's not a system issue. CC prior to CC (2014) I never experienced this issue.

Linux AMD64, JDK 1.5_03: slow performance with large heap

Tomcat app server running on jdk 1.4.2 on 32 bit Linux configured with mx1750m, ms1750m, runs fast. Returns 2MB of data through HttpServlet in under 30 secs.
Moving the same app server to 64 bit on jdk 1.5.03 configured with mx13000m, ms10000m, the same request for data takes 5-20 minutes. Not sure why the timing is not consistent. If the app server is configured with mx1750m, ms1750m, performance is about 60 secs or less.
I checked java settings through jstat. -d64 is the default. Why would increasing the heap cause such slow performance? Physical memory on the box = 32MB.
It looks like it's definitely java related since a perl app making a http request to the server takes under a minute to run. We moved to 64bit to get around 1.7GB limitation of 32bit Linux but now performance is unacceptable.

I Aggree, a AMD 64 with only 32 MB of memory would be a very strange beast indeed, heck, my graphics card has 4 times that, and it's not the most up-to-date.
Keep in mind that switching to 64 does not only mean bigger memory space but also bigger pointers (on the sub-java level) and probably more padding in your memory, which leads to bigger memory consumption which in turn leads to more bus traffic which slows stuff down. This might be a cause for your slowdown, but that should not usually result in a slowdown as sever as the one you noticed.
Maybe it's also a simple question of a not-yet-completely-optimized JDK for amd64.

Slow performance with large images working at 300 DPI

I'm working on creating a poster for a film. I have my workspace set up for 24" x 36" movie poster size at 300 DPI. I have an intel i5 2500k processor @ 3.3 Ghz. I have 4 gigs of RAM and I have PS set to use 2/3 that. I have a scratch disk set on a large separate drive. The program runs very slow and takes forever to save or render a resize of any image. I'm wondering if there's a way to decrease the "size" of the images (in otherwords the data so the layers arent ginormous in terms of data) but still be able to work at 300 DPI?

inDesign costs something like two thirds the price of Photoshop, so expensive for a one off job. It's sacrilege to mention it in these forums, but of you have a high end Office version installed, you might have Publisher on your system. It would do the job easily, and is probably more intuitive to learn than inDesign. But if your serious about it, inDesign is ten times the program, and the printer won't smile knowingly when you deliver the image file and they ask how it was created.

Slow Performance with large OR query

Hi All;
I am new to this forum... so please tread lightly on me if I am asking some rather basic questions. This question has been addressed before in this forum more than a year ago (http://swforum.sun.com/jive/thread.jsp?forum=13&thread=9041). I am going to ask it again. We have a situation where we have large filters using the OR operator. The searches look like:
& (objectclass=something) (|(attribute=this) (attribute=that) (attribute=something) .... )
We are finding that the performance between 100 attributes versus 1 attribute in a filter is significant. In order to increase performance, we have to issue the following filters in seperate searches:
& (objectclass=something) (attribute=this)
& (objectclass=something) (attribute=that)
& (objectclass=something) (attribute=something)
The first search takes an average of 60 seconds, and the combination of searches in the second filter takes an average of 4 seconds. This is a large performance improvement.
We feel that this solution is not desirable because:
1. When the server is under heavy load, this solution will not scale very well.
2. We feel we should not have to modify our code to deal with a server deficiency
3. This solution creates too much network traffic
My questions:
1. Is there a query optimizer in the server? If so, shouldn't the query optimizer take care of this?
2. Why is there such a large performance difference between the two filters above?
3. Is there a setting somewhere in the server (documented or undocumented) that would handle this issue? (ie average query size)
4. Is this a known issue?
5. Besides breaking up the filter into pieces, is there a better way to approach this type of problem?
Thanks in advance,
Paul Rowe

I also have serious performance issues, and i don´t even have a large database catalog, only around 2.000 pictures, the db file itself is only 75 mb big. Done optimization - didn´t help. What i encountered is that the cpu usage of LR 1.1 goes up and STAYS up around 85% for 4-5 minutes after programm start - during that time, zooming in to an image can take 2-3 minutes! After 4-5 minutes, cpu usage drops to 0%, the background task (whatever LR does during that time!) has finished and i can work very smoothly. preview generation cannot be the problem, since it also happens when i´m working in a folder that already has all previews build, close LR, and start again instantly. LR loads and AGAIN i´ll have to wait 4-5 minutes untill cpu ussage has dropped so i can continue working with my images smoothly.
This is very annoying! I will stop using LR and go back to bridge/acr/ps, this is MUCH much faster. BUMMER!

Very Slow performance with large files

Using iTunes with my AppleTV I've been in the slow and painful process of digitizing my dvd library and when converting the LOTR (extended edition) trilogy I ran into a problem post-conversion. They play fine in Quicktime 7.3.1, I can add them to the iTunes library but when attempting to edit any information within iTunes and attempting to save iTunes freezes for several minutes before working or crashing (odds are around 50/50). If I just add the file to the library and try to play it the movie doesn't show up on the AppleTV either which is even stranger.
Output format of the movie: MP4/H.264, native 720x480 resolution, 23.97fps, 2Mbps video stream, 128k audio stream(limit of winavi).
Output Size: 4.4GB
Length: 4hours 24minutes
Software versions: iTunes 7.3.1, QuickTime 7.3.1
OS: Windows XP Pro SP2(current patch level as of 7/15).

Is possible than iTunes have 4 Gb folder limits. I'm trying put a little of light over the problem because iTunes Help don't said.
Cheers

Slow responses with headphones

I noticed today that my nano with skull candy headphones plugged in was slow to respond, had to click several times before desired action would happen. Also, the screen would not time out, running my battery down fast. Everything worked fine with no headphones plugged in.
Anyone seen this, I did a reset tonight and sync after that.

Contact skull candy headphones tech support.

Apple TV slow performance with large iTunes library

We have a rather large (movies + music) iTunes library and the appleTV is performing very poorly... Are there any suggestions how to improve wake-up time, menu response time or performance overall? Will it help to put our music on a separate HDD and turn that off when we want to use the appleTV? Anything else?

Sorry to butt-in, we have a 2.6TB iTunes library. Music and Photos are kept on the AppleTV all else is streamed. We use a Lacie 4Big Quadra attached to a iMac G5 streamed via Airport Extreme.
The only delays we get are for the Lacie coming out of sleep mode (takes about 45 seconds), which sometimes results in an on-screen message of File Format not compatible (which just means "not found"). Retrying the selection starts the streaming. I expect the iTunes library streams the Movie/TV programme to the AppleTV which buffers it for delivery. This could be the delay you're experiencing, maybe 15-20 seconds before it starts to play - is this what you mean?
As our library has grown we've noticed no significant performance drop-off.
Possibly it's a network issue, have you run the network diagnostics on Apple TV ?
Roger

Slow response with ApEx 4.1

We migrated an application from ApEx 3.x to ApEx 4.1 with Oracle 11g with the Stand-Alone Application Express Listener.
Using Firebug, we see:
Significant wait times when method POST to http://x.x.x.x:8080/apex/wwv_flow.accept
Status messages of 302 Moved Temporarily
In HTML tab:ERR-7621 Could not determine workspace for application (:) on application accept. Expecting p_company or wwv_flow_company cookie to contain security group id of application owner.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

I have finally found how to replicate this problem.
This happens on a "cross workspace" applications but with same authentication.
Suppose I have application A which owns to workspace AA, and application B which owns to workspace BB. Both use same authentication scheme and same session cookie.
Application B uses APEX_LANG.MESSAGE.
If I log (to authenticate!) to application B, translated messages are displayed correctly.
If I log to application A, and then using the same application session ID I open application B (without do a login, as I'm already authenticated!) the problem appears.
No translated messages are displayed, but text message code is displayed instead .
I have found another issue caused by this "cross workspace" situation.
In the same way, if I log to A and then open B, here interactive reports don't display the report select list (for primary and private report), while if I log directly to B report select list are there!
Could this be considered a bug?
Marco

Re: Data Modeler: Slow responsiveness with large Models

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for