Re: Multiple Processor-Objects

I found some h263 encoded media files on http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/V-codecs/h263/
and even used the exact same file for the concat-sample - with the following result:
- Create processor for: file://XXX/movies/movie10.mov
- Create processor for: file://XXX/movies/movie10.mov
- Cannot transcode the tracks to a common format for concatenation! Sorry.
Failed to match the tracks.
Failed to concatenate the inputs
Could someone perhaps offer media-sample that are guaranteed to work with at least that concat-example?
Edited by: Yppolitia on Feb 4, 2010 8:13 AM

H.263 encoding is only supposed by the performance packs, so if you're using the cross-platform pack you won't be able to encode H.263.
For samples, I generally use these:
[http://www.cs.odu.edu/~cs778/spring04/lectures/jmfsolutions/clips/]

Similar Messages

New technique to place multiple anchored objects in InDesign story

Hello,
For a while I have been trying to figure out how to insert multiple anchored objects into an Indesign story. As far as I can tell, you cannot copy multiple objects that have already been placed in a document (such as a multi-page pdf) into an InDesign story, but must copy and paste them one-by-one into the story. This is a problem for a project I am working on where I want to have a large number of 340x52 pt pdfs to flow throughout a document in a master text frame interspersed with text.
I have now found a solution for this issue that I thought I would share in case it would be helpful for anyone. It utilizes Automator actions for Mac OS X and Microsoft Word 2011 [2008 may work also, but I don't have a copy of that to test]; I am not good with scripting but perhaps similar solutions could be found for other systems and programs.
1. If you want to place a multipage pdf within a text frame, first it into individual files for each page (with Acrobat Pro or pdftk or something similiar).
2. Create an Automator service or program with the action "Create New Word Document". You can also use another automator action to save the document, or save it manually (to change the filename). In the finder, select the items you want, then run the service or drag them into the Automator program you have created.
3. Place the word document into your InDesign story. Your items will now be anchored objects ordered in your text frame as they were in the finder.
Please let me know if this is helpful or if anyone has suggestions for doing this process is a more efficient way. I am not sure, but it may be the case that this approach would only work on Macs, as I gather from this thread.

I might note that I am using InDesign CS 5, and importing from a document stored in docx format.

Using multiple processors and threads

Hi there,
Just a quick question... I am working on an application that is VERY processor intensive. There is no real way to improve this, but I do have access to a multiple processor server.
Can anyone tell me if Java code can be written to utilise more than one processor? I assume due to the VM, that this is unlikely - and that one must resort to the operating system used on the server, where hopefully the VM can be forced to use more than one processor.
If this is not possible - has anyone written applications that run across several VMs? Is this possible, and what is the performance like?
Thanks for any help.
Nick

The Java VM will indeed utilize multiple processors. Just create a seperate thread to do your work and it will schedule it. In fact it's way easier than most languages:
public class MyThreadimplements Runnable {
public MyThread() {
try {
Thread newThread= new Thread(this);
newThread.setPriority(Thread.MIN_PRIORITY); // see other enumerations to boost priority
newThread.start();
} catch(Exception e) {
System.err.println(e);
public void run() {
// do your work here
}

Not possible to store multiple fileReference object in same array?

Hi all,
I'm trying to store multiple fileReference object in one array. But everytime I push() in a new object the old objects that's already in the array gets set to the latest object.
I'm letting the user select an image. Then I push the selected fileReference object into an array like my_array.push( FileReference(event.target) );
If I then run a loop on "my_array" to check it's content I'm getting the latest pushed fileReference object for every index in the array.
With one object pushed in:
1. Image1.jpg
With two objects pushed in:
1. Image2.jpg
2. Image2.jpg
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Thank you so much

This is basically what I'm doing. The code is cut out from a larger portion so there might be errors, but hopefully not.
// Local Files
private var localFiles:FileReference           = new FileReference();
private var fileList:Array                = new Array();
private function browse(event:MouseEvent)
     trace("[Browse] Using local files");
     localFiles.addEventListener(Event.SELECT, onLocalFilesSelected);
     localFiles.browse(getAllowedTypes());
* LOCAL FILE
private function onLocalFilesSelected(e:Event)
     localFiles.addEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, localFileHandler);
     localFiles.load();
private function localFileHandler(event:Event):void
     localFiles.removeEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, localFileHandler);
     fileList.push(FileReference(event.target));
     showFileList();
private function showFileList():void
     for(var $x:int=0;$x<fileList.length;$x++)
          var file:FileReference = FileReference(fileList[$x]);
          trace($x+": " + file.name);
Thank you

Querying for a script insert multiple selected objects...

Is there a script or plugin which insert multiple selected objects in one new text frame with one click?
And is there a script or plugin which extract the content of anchored text frame out it's frame and replace it with it's frame. and extract selected text and insert it inside a new anchored text frame in it's place? (like convert text to table - convert table to text, but instead table we use text frame)

Hi,
Using OMB scripting to set attribute properties in a data mapping sort of defeats the purpose of utilizing a graphical user interface to define and set properties for a data mapping? Surely the GUI data mapping tool was created to get away from writing scripts and scripting would also require that you know the name of the data mapping, table operator and the set of attribute names for which you have to write one line of script to set each property value, i.e. 90 lines to set 90 attribute values.
Cheers,
Phil

RE: multiple named objects with the same name andinterface

David,
First I will start by saying that this can be done by using named anchored
objects and registering them yourself in the name service. There is
documentation on how to do this. And by default you will get most of the
behavior you desire. When you do a lookup in the name service (BindObject
method) it will first look in the local partition and see if there is a
local copy and give you that copy. By anchoring the object and manually
registering it in the name service you are programmatically creating your
own SO without defining it as such in the development environment. BTW in
response to your item number 1. This should be the case there as well. If
your "mobile" object is in the same partition where the service object he is
calling resides, you should get a handle to the local instance of the
service object.
Here is the catch, if you make a bind object call and there is no local copy
you will get a handle to a remote copy but you can not be sure which one!
It end ups as more or less a random selection. Off the top of my head and
without going to the doc, I am pretty sure that when you register an
anchored object you can not limit it's visibility to "User".
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of David Foote
Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
All,
More than once, I have wished that Forte allowed you to place named
objects with the same name in more than one partition. There are two
situations in which this seems desirable:
1) Objects that are not distributed, but are mobile (passed by value to
remote objects), cannot safely reference a Service Object unless it has
environment visibility, but this forces the overhead of a remote method
call when it might not otherwise be necessary. If it were possible to
place a copy of the same Service Object (with user visibility) in each
partition, the overhead of a remote method call could be avoided. This
would only be useful for a service object whose state could be safely
replicated.
2) My second scenario also involves mobile objects referencing a Service
Object, but this time I would like the behavior of the called Service
Object to differ with the partition from which it is called.
This could be accomplished by placing Service Objects with the same name
and the same interface in each partition, but varying the implementation
with the partition.
Does anyone have any thoughts about why this would be a good thing or a
bad thing?
David N. Foote
Consultant
Get Your Private, Free Email at <a href=
"http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

David,
First I will start by saying that this can be done by using named anchored
objects and registering them yourself in the name service. There is
documentation on how to do this. And by default you will get most of the
behavior you desire. When you do a lookup in the name service (BindObject
method) it will first look in the local partition and see if there is a
local copy and give you that copy. By anchoring the object and manually
registering it in the name service you are programmatically creating your
own SO without defining it as such in the development environment. BTW in
response to your item number 1. This should be the case there as well. If
your "mobile" object is in the same partition where the service object he is
calling resides, you should get a handle to the local instance of the
service object.
Here is the catch, if you make a bind object call and there is no local copy
you will get a handle to a remote copy but you can not be sure which one!
It end ups as more or less a random selection. Off the top of my head and
without going to the doc, I am pretty sure that when you register an
anchored object you can not limit it's visibility to "User".
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of David Foote
Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
All,
More than once, I have wished that Forte allowed you to place named
objects with the same name in more than one partition. There are two
situations in which this seems desirable:
1) Objects that are not distributed, but are mobile (passed by value to
remote objects), cannot safely reference a Service Object unless it has
environment visibility, but this forces the overhead of a remote method
call when it might not otherwise be necessary. If it were possible to
place a copy of the same Service Object (with user visibility) in each
partition, the overhead of a remote method call could be avoided. This
would only be useful for a service object whose state could be safely
replicated.
2) My second scenario also involves mobile objects referencing a Service
Object, but this time I would like the behavior of the called Service
Object to differ with the partition from which it is called.
This could be accomplished by placing Service Objects with the same name
and the same interface in each partition, but varying the implementation
with the partition.
Does anyone have any thoughts about why this would be a good thing or a
bad thing?
David N. Foote
Consultant
Get Your Private, Free Email at <a href=
"http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

Best practice for linking fields from multiple entity objects

I am currently transitioning from PHP to ADF. I'm looking for the best practice for linking data from multiple entity objects.
Example:
EO 'REQUESTS' has fields: req_id, name, dt, his_stat_id, her_stat_id
EO 'STATUSES' has fields: stat_id, short_txt_descr
'REQUESTS' is linked to EO 'STATUSES' on: STATUSES.stat_id = REQUESTS.his_status_id
'REQUESTS' is also linked to EO 'STATUSES' on: STATUSES.stat_id = REQUESTS.her_status_id
REQUESTS.his_status_id is independent of REQUESTS.her_status_id
When I create a VO for REQUESTS, I want to display: REQUESTS.name, REQUESTS.dt, STATUSES.short_txt_descr (for his_stat_id), STATUS.short_txt_descr (for her_stat_id)
What is the best practice for accomplishing this? It appears I could do it a few different ways:
1. Create the REQUESTS VO with a LOV for his_stat_id and her_stat_id
2. Create the REQUESTS VO with the join to STATUSES performed within the query for the VO. This would require joining on the STATUSES EO twice (his_stat_id, her_stat_id)
3. I just started reading about View Links - would that somehow do what I'm looking for?
I also need to be able to update his_status_id and her_status_id through the by selecting a STATUSES.short_txt_descr from a dropdown.
Any suggestions on how to approach such a stupidly simple task?
Using jDeveloper 11.1.2.2.0 if that makes a difference in the solution.
Thanks ahead of time,
CJ

CJ,
I vote for solution 1 as it's just your use case. As you said you what to update the his_status_id and her_status_id through the by selecting a STATUSES.short_txt_descr by a drop down. This is exactly the LOV solution.
ViewLinks are used fro master detail navigation (which you don't do here) and Joining the data make it difficult to update (and you still need a LOV for the drop down box.
Timo

Multiple resource objects provision issue in OIM10g

Hi Team,
We're facing an issue regarding multiple access policy trigger for a specific resource object in OIM.
The scenario is whenever we try to process the enablement or creation of users through flat file recon, users are created / enabled with multiple resource objects in their resource profiles.
When we checked in User Resource Access History report, we observe that the access policy has been triggering multiple times for these users resulting in users with multiple resource objects. Amongst these one shows provisioned/Enabled and the other shows provisioning/in some cases Provisioned/Enabled.
Please advise as this has become an ongoing issue and also has led into data mess-up.
Appreciate your help on this one..
Regards,
Sagar

The terminology sounds a little confusing to me:
If you mean you wanna create multiple IT Resources for a single IT Resource Instance so that the user can select the appropriate IT Resource during request creation -> All good upto here. But then since the Object/Request Form attached to a resource would be the same, so any user would always see the same form fields for creationg request.
Example: Users creating request for Oracle Database Accounts but different server locations
If it means you just need to create multiple Resource Objects then its a straighaway standard requirement and could be handled with normal Connector Development methodology.
Example: Users creating requests for different resources like Oracle Database Accounts & Active Directory Accounts

How do i open my multiple smart objects in my psd in one illustrator vector file?

HELLO
I have created a psd.
It contains multiple smart objects which when double clicked link you to illustrator.
I would like to open all the vector images from this file in one illustrator file.
Is this possible?

I guess it might be (almost) possible with Scripting in principle but probably not practically.
To elaborate:
One could open all the Smart Objects with a Script and with BridgeTalk it should be possible to have Illustrator perform tasks on those.
But one can not, as far as I know, directly access scale, rotation, skew of a placed Smart Object with a Script, so that information would have to be determined with work-arounds or (partially) neglected.
If you need vector output why did you make the arrangement in Photoshop?

Controlling Post Order of Multiple View Objects

Hi ,
Here is the scenario:
I have a use case of "Creating an Abstract"
Steps:
step1 ) (Page 1) Author presents the details of the abstract (Details goes to 2 tables ABSTRACT & ABSTRACT_CONTENT tables). For the 2 tables i have 2 entities. I use a view here called CreateAbstractView from both the tables( here i control the post order of the entities ....code from jdeveloper 11g guide)
Step 2)(Page 2) Author presents details of Additional Authors. I use the view (*AdditionalAuthorDetailsView*) (Details goes to 2 tables AUTHOR & ABSTRACT). Here in the abstract table i have a parent key(parent abstract id) So all the additional authors has a record in Abstract table with parent_abstract_id from step1. ABSTRACT table also has a foreign key (author_id) .Here also i control the post order of the 2 entity object using the code from jdeveloper 11g guide.
I also have a link from CreateAbstractView to AdditionalAuthorDetailsView (abstract_id in Abstract table from CreateAbstractView to parent_abstract_id in Abstract table from AdditionalAuthorDetailsView )
If i have a commit on both the pages , i don't see a problem.
But i want to have a commit process at the end so that the user can review the information. So when i try to add a commit process at the end , i get a exception (Parent Key not found exception) which i came to understand that commit from AdditionalAuthorDetailsView is happening first which is trying to insert a record into ABSTRACT table and cannot find the parent_abstract_id.
How do i control the post order for multiple view objects in such scenarios?

Hi!
Please take a look at the dev guide. It comes down to controlling the posting order on entity level.
http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/html/B25947_01/bcadveo007.htm#CEGJAFCF
Sascha

ASDM multiple network objects vs group for rules

I was just curious if there are any performance benefits of using multiple network objects on multiple rules vs consolidating them into fewer rules by grouping them?
For example, I have about 10 lines of NAT exempt rules from the same source to multiple destinations. Is there anything to be gained if I consolidated those into a single rule using an object group for the multiple destinations aside from cleaning up the clutter in ASDM?
Thanks

Hello Tony,
Of course, it will be better because the processing that the ASA is going to use to determine witch rule to match would be decremented, also it would take less space on the configuration file (memory). those are some of the pros regarding creating groups for particular rules.
Sometimes a huge configuration file can increment the CPU usage,etc,etc. so it is better to keep it as small and organized as possible.
Please rate helpful posts.
Regards,
Julio

Creating Views on multiple entity-objects

Dear Forum,
Is it possible to make associations and lookups based on multiple entity-objects.
I made a custom view, say view1 based on two entity-objects, say entity1 and entity2.
I used some fields from entity1 and some from entity2. There's a 1 to 1 association between the index of entity1 and entity2.
Now I want to make a master-detail between entity1 and view1. I tried to make links and associations, but that didn't work.
Any ideas?
Kind regards,
Arjen

Arjen,
I am a bit confused by what it is you need. It appears you may have Entity Object and View Objects mixed up. Entity Objects are one-to-one with database tables. So, for every table one Entity Object, and the other way around. Associations are, pretty much, one-to-one with foreign keys on the database. So, if two tables have a foreign key between them, the two Entity Objects will have an Association between them. In that respect, Entity Objects and Associations are usually 'strictly defined' by the database model.
The layer of View Objects and View Links is where you 'get design control' in the Business Components arena. A View Object can be based on zero, one or more Entity Objects. Viewlink, defining 'Master-Detail' relationships between View Objects (and NOT Entity Objects!!) can but don't have to be based on Entity Associations (i.e. foreign keys), but can be based on any attribute in the 'Master' view to any attribute in the 'Detail' view.
In this respect, your statement that you want to "make a master-detail between entity1 and view1" makes no sense. It sounds like you need to create a View2, and then make a View Link between View1 and View2.
Kind regards,
Peter Ebell
JHeadstart Team

How to share a bind variable across multiple view objects?

Hi, Can someone tell me if it's possible to share a bind variable among multiple view objects within an application module? My web page displays data from different VOs on different regions. But all data should be controlled by the same bind variable, which appears in all queries. How can I achieve this?
Please help.

Best to state your JDev version, and technology stack (eg. ADF BC) when posting.
I can think of 2 approaches.
1) Create a parent VO based on SELECT :bindVar FROM dual, then create links between your other VOs and the parent
2) Create a AM client interface method that programatically sets the bind variable in each VO.
Can you specify your use case? This one tends to come up when discussing effective from/to dated queries.
CM.

Creating Multiple Resource Objects for OOTB Connectors

All,
I am trying to create a second AD User resource object for the OOTB connector. I would like to think that the AD Connector (and all connectors, for that matter) was designed to handle the creation of multiple Resource Objects for the same Resource Types, but am I wrong? It doesn't seem like the OIM Connector can handle this easily.
Has anyone created multiple resource objects for a connector? Is this a fairly simple task, or will it require a large effort? Is it even possible? Any pointers?
Thanks!

I will provide a little help with the duplication. I found the best way to do it is to import the original connector. Go through the different pieces making each one have a unique name, that is not part of any of the other piece names. You need to have unique names for the following:
1. Resource Object
2. Process Definition - Provisioning
3. IT Resource
4. Form - Process
5. Scheduled Task
After you import the connector, rename each of the following to something unique. I would also update your process form to have a default value of your IT Resource, as well as your scheduled task values to point to the new unique names. Export the 5 items, no dependecies. The adapters will all be the same. Use find and replace for the values and then import the new XML. If it works, duplicate the XML for each of the new workflows you want to create.
-Kevin

Single transaction through multiple service objects [Spring]

Hello.
I have multiple service objects, while methods in service objects represent use cases.
If I call the method from the other method in the same service object, then the second (called) method uses the same transaction as the first (caller), because of default propagation REQUIRED is applied.
.. as is shown in the following pseudo code:
@Transactional
public class PersonService {
     private PersonDAO personDAO;
     public void otherMethod() {
     public void savePerson(Person person) {
          otherMethod();
          personDAO.save(person);
}But I need to call service methods of different service objects, because some use cases use other use cases. I also need all those called methods to be done as a single transaction.
@Transactional
public class OrderService {
     private OrderDAO orderDAO;
     public void saveOrder(Person person, Order order) {
          PersonService personService = CONTEXT.getBean("personService");
          personService.savePerson(person);
          orderDAO.save(order);
}If I do it like that, the new transaction proxy is created and all personService stuff is executed in the new transaction. How to configure @Transactional annotated objects or Spring beans to do all service stuff in single transaction?
I have Hibernate sessionfactory, DAOs and services beans simply configured in Spring configuration XML, using autowiring and transaction annotation config. I prefer using @transactional annotated service classes, but if I had to use more complex Spring transaction configuration to achieve the goal I won't have any problem with it.
Thank you in advance.

I would like it to be done is single transaction but it isn't. As the bean is retrieved from the spring context in OrderService's method
PersonService personService = CONTEXT.getBean("personService");a new transaction for PersonService is started. So then I have two transactions in progress - one for OrderService and second for PersonService. I need the PersonService (or any other service object) to detect already pending transaction and use that. Not create new (it's own). I use no arguments in @Transactional annotation so default propagation REQUIRED should be used, but it still creates a new transaction for PersonService stuff.
I'm posting my applicationContext.xml (simplified slightly)
<beans default-autowire="byType">
     <bean id="dataSource"
          class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource">
     </bean>
     
     <bean id="sessionFactory"
          class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.LocalSessionFactoryBean">
          <property name="dataSource">
               <ref local="dataSource" />
          </property>
     </bean>
     <bean id="hibernateTxManager"
          class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager">
          <property name="sessionFactory">
               <ref local="sessionFactory" />
          </property>
     </bean>
     <tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="hibernateTxManager" />
     
     <bean id="personDAO" class="net.package.dao.PersonDAO" />
     <bean id="orderDAO" class="net.package.dao.OrderDAO" />
     
     <bean id="personService" class="net.package.service.PersonService" />
     <bean id="orderService" class="net.package.service.OrderService" />
</beans>Thank you

Re: Multiple Processor-Objects

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for