Records are not inserted into MTL_TXN_REQUEST_HEADERS,MTL_TXN_REQUEST_LINES

Hi all,
I am doing pick release thru API.
For that , I have run following API successfully but my problem is that records are not inserted into MTL_TXN_REQUEST_HEADERS , MTL_TXN_REQUEST_LINES
tables so that I cannot generate the move order. Can anyone suggent the valuable tips for that ?
1. WSH_DELIVERIES_PUB.create_update_delivery
2. WSH_DELIVERY_DETAILS_PUB.Detail_to_Delivery
3. WSH_PICKING_BATCHES_PUB.CREATE_BATCH
4. WSH_PICKING_BATCHES_PUB.RELEASE_BATCH
5. WSH_DELIVERIES_PUB.Delivery_Action ( for p_action_code = 'PICK-RELEASE' )
regards with thanks in advance
sanjay

Hi All,
To create a Move Order Header & Line Record in MTL_TXN_REQUEST_HEADERS and MTL_TXN_REQUEST_LINES tables , I have run an seeded
procedure : CreateMoveOrderHeader & CreateMoveOrderLines .
The procedure : CreateMoveOrderHeader was run successfully but when I am going to run procedure : CreateMoveOrderLines , it is giving
an error .
Following Error text I am receiving at the time of running of procedure : CreateMoveOrderLines .
Initialized applications context: 5707 50138 660
*==========================================================*
Calling INV_MOVE_ORDER_PUB.Create_Move_Order_Lines API
*==========================================================*
Return Status: E
Error Message :INV
*==========================================================*
From the above error message, no specific error is received . Only " Error Message : INV " is received hence it is very difficult to judge & resolve an error .
Can anyone guide me that what is an error ? For what reason I am getting an error ?
regrads
Sanjay

Similar Messages

2LIS_02_S896 issue : Records are not updated into BW

Hi
->We use 2LIS _ 02 _ SCL extractor to pass PO's to BW with delta.
->Works fine until the last week ,
->But on a particular date ( 15.05.2007) some of the records are not updated in BW.They are even not found at PSA level itself
->For eg for a material X there are two entries found in R/3 ( MB51 ) for the same posting date, now one of them is picked in BW (PSA level ) and other is not.
->There was no load fail / delta fail in BW and there is no exit written for this.
->Records are not updated in RSA3.
Let me know how this issue can be fixed.Its urgent.
Thanks,
Jilani

Hi Gagan,
Kindly check if you have any selection restrictions in your infopackage.
Regards.

Record is not inserting into the Table thourgh forms 10g

Hi All,
I have the form built in 10g(10.1.2.0.2).
Basically the form has 2 blocks.
Block 1 with only one item, where we enter some value and hit enter(this will navigate to block2 and execute the query).
Block 2(tabular) will fetch the records. Now this block2 have 3 columns(caseid, userid, date).
Now when I insert a new record, I just need to enter the caseid only. And userid and date have to be automatically populated.
I can populate the USERID and DATE fields.
And when I enter some value in caseid item of block 2, and then do Control+S(to insert the record and Save the transaction),
i get the message saying FRM-40400: Transaction complete: 1 records applied and saved.
But when I query again for the same, I dont se the record inserted into the table.
Why is this happening?
Help please...

@ Inol
There is no promary or foriegn key relation ship. The form is fetching records from just one table. As I said block1 has col1. and Block2 has col2,3,4.
@Andreas
Yes I did select * from table, select count(*) from table in SQL*Plus. Nothing is inserted.
And one thing I have to tall here is, I have a ON-INSERT trigger in block2.
The code in ON-INSERT trigger is
-- :BLOCK2.DATE := TO_DATE(:DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') ;
/* commented since I was populating date by assigning $$DATETIME$$ to the Initial value property of the data item. */
:BLOCK2.SOURCE_CASE := :BLOCK1.SOURCE_CASEID;Forgot to tell you,
Since I was inserting the record from block2(3 columns), to the table which has 4 columns, there is another item in block 2 which has the visible property No.
So the block 2 has 4 columns. And the hidden column will hold the value that is in the item of block1. This is what i'm pushing in the ON-INSERT trigger.
Edited by: Charan on Sep 20, 2011 1:51 PM

Urgent:-Values are not inserted into the custom table

Hi, I am inserting the data from the custom OAF form into a custom table. Only the WHO columns are populated into the table but no field value is populated into the custom table. I have written the following code -
In CO
if (pageContext.getParameter("Continue") != null)
OAApplicationModule am = pageContext.getRootApplicationModule();
OAViewObject CwkInfo = (OAViewObject)am.findViewObject("CWKInfoVO1");
am.invokeMethod("initializevo");
in AM
public void initializevo()
CWKInfoVOImpl testVo = (CWKInfoVOImpl) this.getCWKInfoVO1();
testVo.insertRow(testVo.createRow());
getTransaction().commit();
Urgent Help is required.
Regards,
Ashish

Hi Ashish,
Double check whether you have attached the correct EO based VO attribute to the columns.
In the Controller
Process Request use the following code:-
public void processRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
super.processRequest(pageContext, webBean);
OAApplicationModule am = pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
if (!pageContext.isFormSubmission())
am.invokeMethod("initQuery", null);
ProcessForm Request
public void processFormRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
System.out.println("Inside Process Form Request");
super.processFormRequest(pageContext, webBean);
OAApplicationModule am = pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
if (pageContext.getParameter("submitButton")!=null)
am.invokeMethod("submit")
AM Code
public void initQuery()
OAViewObject vvo = (OAViewObject)getEmployeeEOVO1();//Give you EO based VO Name
if (!vvo.isPreparedForExecution())
vvo.executeQuery();
Row row = vvo.createRow();
vvo.insertRow(row);
row.setNewRowState(Row.STATUS_INITIALIZED);
public void submit()
getTransaction().commit();
Import necessage classes.
Thanks
--Anil

Data is not inserting into table

Hi Team,
I am inserting data into a custom table.
but my records are not inserting into table
//CO File
public void processRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
super.processRequest(pageContext, webBean);
OAApplicationModule am = pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
am.invokeMethod("createEmployee");
// am.invokeMethod("init");
* Procedure to handle form submissions for form elements in
* a region.
* @param pageContext the current OA page context
* @param webBean the web bean corresponding to the region
public void processFormRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
super.processFormRequest(pageContext, webBean);
OAApplicationModule am = pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
if (pageContext.getParameter("Apply") != null)
OAViewObject vo = (OAViewObject)am.findViewObject("TestEmpVO1");
String NAME = (String)vo.getCurrentRow().getAttribute("Name");
Number employeeNumber = (Number)vo.getCurrentRow().getAttribute("Num");
String NUM = String.valueOf(employeeNumber.intValue());
am.invokeMethod("apply");
MessageToken[] tokens = { new MessageToken("EMP_NAME", NAME),
new MessageToken("EMP_NUMBER", NUM) };
OAException confirmMessage = new OAException("AK", "FWK_TBX_T_EMP_CREATE_CONFIRM", tokens,
OAException.CONFIRMATION, null);
pageContext.putDialogMessage(confirmMessage);
else if (pageContext.getParameter("Cancel") != null)
am.invokeMethod("rollbackEmployee");
TransactionUnitHelper.endTransactionUnit(pageContext, "empCreateTxn");
// End CO
//AMImpl
package oracle.apps.fnd.framework.toolbox.labsolutions.server;
import oracle.jbo.Row;
import oracle.jbo.Transaction;
import oracle.jbo.RowSetIterator;
import oracle.jbo.domain.Number;
import oracle.apps.fnd.common.MessageToken;
import oracle.apps.fnd.common.VersionInfo;
import oracle.apps.fnd.framework.server.OAApplicationModuleImpl;
import oracle.apps.fnd.framework.OAException;
import oracle.apps.fnd.framework.OARow;
import oracle.apps.fnd.framework.OAViewObject;
import oracle.apps.fnd.framework.server.OAViewObjectImpl;
// --- File generated by Oracle Business Components for Java.
public class TestEmpAMImpl extends EmployeeAMImpl
* This is the default constructor (do not remove)
public TestEmpAMImpl()
* Container's getter for TestEmpVO1
public TestEmpVOImpl getTestEmpVO1()
return (TestEmpVOImpl)findViewObject("TestEmpVO1");
* Creates a new employee.
public void createEmployee()
OAViewObject vo = (OAViewObject)getTestEmpVO1();
// Per the coding standards, this is the proper way to initialize a
// VO that is used for both inserts and queries. See View Objects
// in Detail in the Developer's Guide for additional information.
if (!vo.isPreparedForExecution())
vo.executeQuery();
Row row = vo.createRow();
vo.insertRow(row);
// Required per OA Framework Model Coding Standard M69
row.setNewRowState(Row.STATUS_INITIALIZED);
} // end createEmployee()
public void apply()
getDBTransaction().commit();
* Sample main for debugging Business Components code using the tester.
public static void main(String[] args)
launchTester("oracle.apps.fnd.framework.toolbox.labsolutions.server", "TestEmpAMLocal");
//End AmImpl
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Ajit

Ajit,
Its always a good idea to close the thread with an explanation. It will help others whenever they are into similar situation.
--Shiv

Record not inserting into the table through Forms 10g

Hi all,
I have created a form in 10g(10.1.2.0.2) based on just one table that has 4 columns(col1, col2, col3, col4).
Here col1, col2 and col3 are VARCHAR2 and col4 is date and all the columns are not null columns(There are no primary and foriegn key constrains, which means duplicates are allowed).
My form contains 2 blocks where block 1 has one text item (col1) and 3 buttons (Delete, Save, Exit).
And block2 is a database block and has col2,col3,col4 which are in tabluar layout frame displaying 10 records.
When the form is opened the cursor has to be in block1.col1 for querrying. Here i enter a value in col1, and then when I click on col2 in the block2, then I put execute_query in new_block_instance of block2, which displays the records.
The block2 properties are not updatable, insertable and query is allowed.
Everything is working good until here. But here in the block2 when I want to insert another record into the table, by navigating all the way down to the last empty record and entering the new values for col2, col3 and col4 And then Ctrl+S will display the message "*FRM-40400: Transaction complete: 1 record applied and saved.*" But actually the record is not inserted into the table.
I also disabled the col4 by setting the Enabled property to No, since while inserting new record the date have to be populated into it and it shouldnt be changed by the user. And im populating the sysdate into the new record by setting Intial Value property to *$$DATE$$*.
And another requirement which I could not work arround here is that, the col3 also should be populated with the username of the user while inserting.
please help me...

Hi Sarah,
I do not want to update the existing record. So I kept Udate Allowed to No in property palette for the items in block2.
Do I have to do this property at block level also?
I'm inserting a new record here.
Edited by: Charan on Sep 19, 2011 8:48 AM

Records are not showing

what is wrong with this code? it is not showing my 7 records.
the output is this [LINK|http://i338.photobucket.com/albums/n440/googleb0y/album1/output01.jpg]
when i use the debugger, intenal table is empty. [LINK|http://i338.photobucket.com/albums/n440/googleb0y/album1/debug01.jpg]
where did i go wrong? thanks for the help.
data: begin of WA,
        MYUID       type ZADDRESSBOOK-USERID,
        MYFNAME     type ZADDRESSBOOK-FNAME,
        MYLNAME     type ZADDRESSBOOK-LNAME,
      end of WA.
data: ITAB like table of WA.
select USERID FNAME LNAME
      from ZADDRESSBOOK
      into corresponding fields of table ITAB.
write: / SY-DBCNT, 'records found'.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
    loop at ITAB into WA.
      write: / WA-MYUID, WA-MYFNAME, WA-MYLNAME.
    endloop.
endif.

Ur problem is with the select statement...
data: begin of WA,
        MYUID       type ZADDRESSBOOK-USERID,
        MYFNAME     type ZADDRESSBOOK-FNAME,
        MYLNAME     type ZADDRESSBOOK-LNAME,
      end of WA.
data: ITAB like table of WA.
select USERID FNAME LNAME
      from ZADDRESSBOOK
      into corresponding fields of table ITAB.
write: / SY-DBCNT, 'records found'.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
    loop at ITAB into WA.
      write: / WA-MYUID, WA-MYFNAME, WA-MYLNAME.
    endloop.
endif.
When u use corresponding fields of addition SAP searches for same field names in table itab but u declare ur table with diff. field names..thats why these records are not entered into the table..as same field names are not found in the table...so to avoid it pl. try.this code:
data: begin of WA,
        MYUID          type ZADDRESSBOOK-USERID,
        MYFNAME     type ZADDRESSBOOK-FNAME,
        MYLNAME     type ZADDRESSBOOK-LNAME,
      end of WA.
data: ITAB like table of WA.
select USERID FNAME LNAME
      from ZADDRESSBOOK
      into table ITAB.
write: / SY-DBCNT, 'records found'.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
    loop at ITAB into WA.
      write: / WA-MYUID, WA-MYFNAME, WA-MYLNAME.
    endloop.
endif.
Regards,
Joy.

Rows are not inserted in the order entered - Forms 4.5 to 9i database

hi
we are using forms 4.5 version with 9i oracle database.
when we save a multi-record block (for eg 5 rows)
the records are not inserted in the database in the
order in which they are entered.
for eg if we enter A,B,C,D,E Records and save
on query the records appearing in the order of C,D,E
A,B like that.
Is there any database parameter or setting which
effects the order of inserting rows in the database(when using forms 4.5).
Pls inform if you have any solution.
Thanks in advance
cks

This is a very common misconception.
You should never concern yourself about the order in which rows are stored in the database. Oracle does not guarantee to return rows in any particular order so you must specify an order by clause when you select the rows.
Without an order by clause, there are various reasons why the order of selected rows could change in different circumstances, and the order in which they are stored should be treated as irrelevant.

Second record not inserting into ztable

Hi All,
I have designed z table with following fields.
1) CONSULTANT
2) MODULE_NAME
3) CR_DATE
4) ISSUE
5) RPT_NAME
6) TCODE
7) REQ_NO
8) DEV_STA
9) QA_STA
10) PRD_STA.
the ztable contains no primaty key as we are storing the duplicates values
I have created One screen with all above fields using module pooled programming. One Input screen is designed containing all above fields. after that when i click on SAVE Button all above fields are getting inserted into ztable. But when i again fill the data the second record is not getting inserted into ztable.
I have written the following code for this :
wa_issue-CONSULTANT = ZISSUE-CONSULTANT.
wa_issue-MODULE_NAME = ZISSUE-MODULE_NAME.
wa_issue-CR_DATE = ZISSUE-CR_DATE.
wa_issue-ISSUE = ZISSUE-ISSUE.
wa_issue-RPT_NAME = ZISSUE-RPT_NAME.
wa_issue-TCODE = ZISSUE-TCODe.
wa_issue-REQ_NO = ZISSUE-REQ_NO.
wa_issue-DEV_STA = ZISSUE-DEV_STA.
wa_issue-QA_STA = ZISSUE-QA_STA.
wa_issue-PRD_STA = ZISSUE-PRD_STA.
insert into zissue values wa_issue .
commit work.

Hi,
hcheck the key fields in the table
Regards,
V.Balaji
Reward if Usefull...

Procedure require in DB:i want insert records in temp table(if that records are not exist in temptable)

i have one "LOGTABLE" having 3000 records, in this table daily 3-4 records will be inserted.this table have 11colums no primary key columns.
i created another temp table as "LOGTABLEMONITOR". (copied from "LOGTABLE" having 3000 records)
i am expecting which are inserting daily 3-4 records in "LOGTABLE" will be inserting temp table "LOGTABLEMONITOR" (if that 3-4 records are not exist in "LOGTABLEMONITOR")

SELECT <columns>
FROM LOGTABLE
EXCEPT
SELECT <columns>
FROM LOGTABLEMONITOR;
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence

Popup not INSERTing into table and not refreshing called page ...

Greetings
Environment: APEX 3.1.1.00.09 on AIX 5.3 in 10gR2
I have read many of the threads concerning my issue and I feel I am getting close to the answer but somehow have combined too many of the suggestions and am tripping over my own code.
Please look at my sample application on apex.oracle.com:
Workspace: galway
User: gwicke
Password: gwicke
Please start with Page3, select any Agency and then click 'Add New Contract'.
There is currently a <strong>BOLD </strong>label 'Add New Builder' that is a link that should open a popup window. Type any name into the field and click 'Create Builder'. This should INSERT the row into the builder table, close the popup, assign the new builder name to the calling page item 'Builder Name' and populate the screen item.
In it's current state, the application will open the popup window, allow entry and close upon clicking the 'Create Builder' button. However the new builder is NOT inserted into the table and the calling page item is not populated.
By looking at the Page Items and Session State I can see the correct values assigned to the 'Pn_BULDER_NAME' items on both the popup page (4) and the calling page (2) but the value does not appear on the screen.
I've read where there's really two parallel universes, no sorry, two versions of the screen items, one in Session State and one that is displayed in the browser and there are steps to take to be sure the one displayed is updated from Session State as I would like in this case.
I've entered Javascript code in the Page4 - header to define the 'passBack2()' function and code in the 'Optional URL Redirect' section of the 'Add Builder' button to hopefully execute the ARP for the INSERT, assign the Page2 items and close the popup. It doesn't quite get all that done.
Any helpp is greatly appreciated. Thanks to Denes for most of the code suggestions I've followed.
-gary

Hi Gary,
I think that there's a very simple solution to this - didn't really spot it last night.
Firstly, yes, you could use a "button" to handle the call for the popup - just make sure that the button is a URL type "button" that is actually an A tag with the call in the URL target setting. Alternatively, you could take you existing A tag and use the same class attribute for one of your buttons as this should make it look like a button.
More importantly, though, I think that we could do it as:
1 - On your page 2 popup call, clear that cache for page 4 (the popup page) - I have already done this in your app by updating the url
2 - On the popup page, allow the user to enter in their desired P4_BUILDER_NAME value (not sure if you want to do something to make this unique?)
3 - Let the user click the Create button on the popup. This will submit the page, which will get your P4_BUILDER_RANK (the pk) value and insert a new record into the table (you could consider creating a sequence and a trigger to handle the creation of a new PK value?).
4 - Assuming the P4_BUILDER_RANK then exists (it wouldn't if there was an error somewhere), then conditionally display a region that had a piece of javascript that submits page 2 and then closes itself - we don't need to pass anything back to page 2 (see below)
5 - As the P4_BUILDER_NAME and P4_BUILDER_RANK exist in the session, when page 2 is being reloaded, (A) the select list would be updated with the new Builder (still not sure why all my entries appeared at the bottom instead of in alpha order??) and (B) both P2_BUILDER_NAME and P2_BUILDER_RANK can have Post Calculation Computations set (NVL(:P4_BUILDER_NAME,:P2_BUILDER_NAME) and NVL(:P4_BUILDER_RANK, :P2_BUILDER_RANK) respectively) - the effect of this is, if there are values stored in the P4 page items, we use them, otherwise we use whatever values were in the P2 page items
6 - Finally, to stop (5) happening in all page 2 loads, you would need to clear the cache for page 4 in as many places as possible - eg, branches to page 2 or buttons on page 2
The reason we can't pass values back to page 2 is that one of the items is a select list. The value we want to select won't appear on the select list until the page has been submitted. So, we can't set the value and submit because the value isn't there. We can't submit and set the value because javascript wouldn't know when the page has been updated (or, at least, you would have to put some independant mechanism in place to identify this, which may become complicated).
So, simply put, as long as we know that if the values are in the session, we can use Post Calculation Computations to set our fields to these values. The only thing to bear in mind is that we need to ensure that these session values only exist when we need them - hence clearing the cache. This principle should work for any type of field - but, as you have no doubt seen, simple text fields can be updated by the popup directly as the field should accept any value we give it.
My only other recommendation would be to completely remove the MRU processes from the page as these are not required (they just confuse the issue) and you could make your PK fetch and record insert into a single process - just to keep things neat and tidy, you understand!
When I finished with your app last night, I did leave it so that javascript would create a new option on the select list and then set the value. But the above methodology seems to be a lot simpler.
Andy

Planned orders are not taking into account the processing time

Hi,
Could you please tell me why planned orders quantities are not based on processing time from the material master.
Materials was set before with 1 day in house production , no matter of lot size.
Based on routings I updated material master with processing time depending on lot size.
What is bottering me now is that planned orders are not taking into account processing time. (e.g. based on my processing time 1000 pce are produced in 3 days, but planned orders show me that 1000 pce are still need in 1 day , but it can not be produced in 1 day ).
what did I miss?
Thanks a lot for any information!

Hello Simona
The in house production time from tab MRP 2 is lot size independent.
However, on tab work scheduling you can define a lot size dependent times.
Please observe that, if you have entered an in house production time, the processing time will not be considered. The F1 help of the field provides the following explanation:
You can define work scheduling times in the material master record in one of two ways:
Either you enter the in-house production time. If required, you can get the system to update this value from the routing.
Or you enter the setup, teardown, processing, and interoperation times. If you maintain these values, the system determines the in-house production time on the basis of lot size.
Therefore, if you want to consider the processing time, you should remove the in house processing time.
BR
Caetano

Created a trigger but new values are not inserting in the backup table

I have created a backup table and writter a trigger on a table such that after update old values and new values are to be inserted into the backup table, but new values are not inserting. I am giving the code please help me
create or replace trigger "SUPPQUOTES_AUDIT"
after update or delete on phsuppquotes for each row
begin
insert into phquotes_audit(cprc_new,suppcode,itemcode,cprc_old,negodt,validdt,userid,TRANDATE) values
(:new.cprc,:old.suppcode,:old.itemcode,:old.cprc,:old.negodt,:old.validdt,:old.userid,SYSDATE);
end;

old values and new
values are to be inserted into the backup table, butwell you have only one insert there, inserting old values with a new id (which is ok if you don't update the id column, but I don't think that :new is available for deleting ops); you should have two inserts:
insert into
phquotes_audit(cprc_new,suppcode,itemcode,cprc_old,negodt,validdt,userid,TRANDATE) values (:old.cprc,:old.suppcode,:old.itemcode,:old.cprc,:old.negodt,:old.validdt,:old.userid,SYSDATE);
if (updating) then
insert into phquotes_audit(cprc_new,suppcode,itemcode,cprc_old,negodt,validdt,userid,TRANDATE) values (:new.cprc,:new.suppcode,:new.itemcode,:new.cprc,:new.negodt,:new.validdt,:new.userid,SYSDATE);
end if;
gojko adzic
http://gojko.net

Selecting Records from 125 million record table to insert into smaller table

Oracle 11g
I have a large table of 125 million records - t3_universe. This table never gets updated or altered once loaded, but holds data that we receive from a lead company.
I need to select records from this large table that fit certain demographic criteria and insert those into a smaller table - T3_Leads - that will be updated with regard to when the lead is mailed and for other relevant information.
My question is what is the best (fastest) approach to select records from this 125 million record table to insert into the smaller table. I have tried a variety of things - views, materialized views, direct insert into smaller table...I think I am probably missing other approaches.
My current attempt has been to create a View using the query that selects the records as shown below. Then use a second query that inserts into T3_Leads from this View V_Market. This is very slow. Can I just use an Insert Into T3_Leads with this query - it did not seem to work with the WITH clause?    My Index on the large table is t3_universe_composite and includes zip_code, address_key, household_key.
CREATE VIEW V_Market as
WITH got_pairs    AS
     SELECT /*+ INDEX_FFS(t3_universe t3_universe_composite) */ l.zip_code, l.zip_plus_4, l.p1_givenname, l.surname, l.address, l.city, l.state, l.household_key, l.hh_type as l_hh_type, l.address_key, l.narrowband_income, l.p1_ms, l.p1_gender, l.p1_exact_age, l.p1_personkey, e.hh_type as filler_data, 1.p1_seq_no, l.p2_seq_no
     ,      ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY l.address_key
                                  ORDER BY      l.hh_verification_date DESC
                  ) AS r_num
     FROM   t3_universe e
     JOIN   t3_universe l ON
            l.address_key = e.address_key
            AND l.zip_code = e.zip_code
          AND   l.p1_gender != e.p1_gender
             AND   l.household_key != e.household_key
             AND l.hh_verification_date >= e.hh_verification_date
SELECT *
FROM got_pairs
where l_hh_type !=1 and l_hh_type !=2 and filler_data != 1 and filler_data != 2 and zip_code in (select * from M_mansfield_02048) and p1_exact_age BETWEEN 25 and 70 and narrowband_income >= '8' and r_num = 1
Then
INSERT INTO T3_leads(zip, zip4, firstname, lastname, address, city, state, household_key, hh_type, address_key, income, relationship_status, gender, age, person_key, filler_data, p1_seq_no, p2_seq_no)
select zip_code, zip_plus_4, p1_givenname, surname, address, city, state, household_key, l_hh_type, address_key, narrowband_income, p1_ms, p1_gender, p1_exact_age, p1_personkey, filler_data, p1_seq_no, p2_seq_no
from V_Market;

I had no trouble creating the view exactly as you posted it. However, be careful here:
and zip_code in (select * from M_mansfield_02048)
You should name the column explicitly rather than select *. (do you really have separate tables for different zip codes?)
About the performance, it's hard to tell because you haven't posted anything we can use, like explain plans or traces but simply encapsulating your query into a view is not likely to make it any faster.
Depending on the size of the subset of rows you're selecting, the /*+ INDEX hint may be doing your more harm than good.

Delta records are not loading from DSO to info cube

My query is about delta loading from DSO to info cube. (Filter used in selection)
Delta records are not loading from DSO to Info cube. I have tried all options available in DTP but no luck.
Selected "Change log" and "Get one request only" and run the DTP, but 0 records got updated in info cube
Selected "Change log" and "Get all new data request by request", but again 0 records got updated
Selected "Change log" and "Only get the delta once", in that case all delta records loaded to info cube as it was in DSO and gave error message "Lock Table Overflow" .
When I run full load using same filter, data is loading from DSO to info cube.
Can anyone please help me on this to get delta records from DSO to info cube?
Thanks,
Shamma

Data is loading in case of full load with the same filter, so I don't think filter is an issue.
When I follow below sequence, I get lock table overflow error;
1. Full load with active table with or without archive
2. Then with the same setting if I run init, the final status remains yellow and when I change the status to green manually, it gives lock table overflow error.
When I chnage the settings of DTP to init run;
1. Select change log and get only one request, and run the init, It is successfully completed with green status
2. But when I run the same DTP for delta records, it does not load any data.
Please help me to resolve this issue.

Records are not inserted into MTL_TXN_REQUEST_HEADERS,MTL_TXN_REQUEST_LINES

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for