Reduce render time with wizard design pattern

I am making a long, complex interactive dynamic form. How do I make the form so that only the page/section the user is working on is visible and renders?

You could create pure virtual class that defines your test step API. Methods for the class would consist of things like setup, teardown, execute to name a few. Your developers could use this base class as the template and API for their tests. The methods regulate the format of the data exchange between your engine and their test. I would also recommend that you use packed libraries so that your test steps are basically plugins. Your test sequence would need to contain the name of the appropriate plugin to use in order to invoke the correct test step. This model is flexible and easy to extend.
We are actually investigating using this same approach for our test system. Our current system uses TestStand and we are going to investigate TestStand 2012 ability to use dynamic dispatch to invoke our test steps. It should be interesting. We use other features of TestStand so it would be nice if we can make this work. In your case a LabVIEW only implementation should be fairly straightforward.
Mark Yedinak
"Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the minutes to hours?"
Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald - Gordon Lightfoot

Similar Messages

  • Reducing Render TIme

    Hi All,
    My render times for a 10 minute clip are getting ridiculous ... about an hour.
    I was thinking, what if i change the sequence settings in some way so as to reduce render time between edits? All i want to do at this stage of the game is get a rough idea of how my edits work.
    Once i'm all done i can just reset the sequence settings to where i want them and do a final render prior to export.
    Any ideas of good, quick, sequence settings to get this process moving along?
    Paul

    Your sequence settings should be set to "lower", not none... might have a problem set to none with field order.
    Sounds like your compositing is causing the render times, and the ONLY fix here is to quit compositing. (not a good idea of course) or get thee to a faster mac... Rendering times in any codec or sequence setting are heavily dependant on CPU speed. The faster the machine, the faster the render. You want a lower quality render for editorial? you can change that in the render settings... just don't forget to re render in high quality in the end of course.
    Jerry

  • Software reuse with Java design patterns

    Anyone have any suggestions on how software can be reused with Java design patterns? Any concrete examples?

    Buy the GoF book. Lot's of examples there.

  • Slow render times with large jpegs - complete system lag

    In a project i'm working on I have two large jpegs with a small zoom scaling effect. Going from 100 to 103 percent.
    I've noticed that both Adobe Media Encoder and Premiere Pro experience a heavy slow down in render time as soon as the jpegs have to be rendered.
    Not only does the render speed almost come to a halt, the complete system lags very heavy, even the mouse cursor won't respond well.
    This happens when i have GPU acceleration enabled and when i do a 2 pass H264 encoding.
    When I have the GPU acceleration disabled the render goes very smooth, and doesn't seem to slow down...
    The jpeg is 4023  x 2677, and 6,97 MB large.
    Scaling the jpeg down to about 1920x1080 in Photoshop and put that one in the timeline made the render go a lot faster.
    I understand that a large picture takes a bit more time to be rendered, but we're talking about a 10minute render whit the large jpeg file and  a 2 minute render with the jpeg resized.
    The total time of the two jpegs in the video is 5 seconds in a 3 minutes video.
    So, that made me think that the render times are exponentially long.
    In the timeline everything runs really smooth.
    Is this considered normal, I can't remember having such big differences in CS5. It's not a major thing, but I wanted to share anyway.
    My system:
    Premiere Pro CC (latest)
    i7 4930K
    32 GB RAM
    2xGTX480
    Footage and project on a Raid0 disk
    Previews/Cache on a Raid0 disk
    System and Premiere on SSD
    Render to a single 7200 rpm drive.

    >wanted to share
    Yes... known issue... I think some of the below is about P-Elements, but the same ideas
    Photo Scaling for Video http://forums.adobe.com/thread/450798
    -HiRes Pictures to DVD http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1187937?tstart=0
    -PPro Crash http://forums.adobe.com/thread/879967

  • Looong render times with motion templates

    I've been a big advocate for FCPX as there are a lot of great features but there are some things that are just killing me, no.1 render time.
    I'm working on some simple presentation edits using motion templates I have built in motion 5 and published to fcpx. The templates all consist of a single dropbox for video with a type field for test messages next to it. These are against a flat white rectangle used to reflect (similar to the coverflow but against a white background) and a subtle camera sweep has been added so it slowly turns from one side to the other by 30 degrees. Each of these is 10 seconds long.
    I chop up my imported movie on the timeline (untouched by grade/fx/retiming) and add the template to each of the chopped clips. I then select each applied template in the timeline and use the video well to select the clip below it for the dropzone. I add my text. That's all good. I now have a timeline approx 3 minutes long consisting of these motion graphics templates.
    Now, if I chose to either render or export a QT with timeline settings, estimated time is 8 - 9 hrs (I have tried both) I left a 3:30 project exporting last night at 11:45. It finished at 9:00AM.
    That is just unacceptable. It is irritating because the functionality of building the sequences in FCPX far outweighs what FCP 7 is capable of but the so-called "renderless" abilities of FCPX
    are making life ****.
    I use Event Manager X to turn off everything I am not using except the individual project. I have reset preferences in Preference Manager to see if that helps. I have purged using terminal. I have my clips on an external firewire 800 HD. I have no other software running. I accept I need a more powerful Mac - I'm using a 2009 3 Ghz Intel Core Duo iMac with 6gig ram using Lion 10.7.2 and FCPX 10.0.2 but 9 hours for a 3:30 clip?
    Any suggestions for where I can cut down on render time are appreciated. The source clip for the video for the dropzones and the final exported presentation movie are HD ProRes.
    Cheers

    The situation you describe does not seem normal. It should not take nearly that long to render and export your 3:30 movie. Considering that your mac is not one of the most recent vintage, and your are editing in full HD, one could expect it to take a bit of time, but nothing like this.
    In the way of troubleshooting, you could try and export just one of these 10 second segments.
    I have no way of knowing for sure, but I guess that it might export in a much more reasonable amount of time.
    I suspect that memory may be running scarce, which, as has been repeatedly mentioned in these fora, is a problem affecting many of us using FCP X under Lion. You mentioned you used "purge" in the Terminal, but in such a long render you might have had to do it repeatedly...

  • Help - Getting slower render times with AE CS6

    Hi everyone
    Wonder if anyone else is getting as described?
    I have a 3m37s project which is predomnantly motion graphics using live shot footage (.MXF files), Illustrator and a few JPGs.
    In CS5 AE I get render times which average around 45mins, so I thought I'd see how quickly CS6 could crank it out by - as you can see I'm getting times which are in excess of 2 almost 3hours!
    The project contains a few 2.5D moves as well as tiny bit of Trapcode 3D Stroke
    I have mentioned on this forum that I'm having the Error 5070 problems with start up and Ray Trace is unavailable but these times seem seriously wrong to me.
    Mac Pro 3,1 (2x 2.8GHZ)
    20GB RAM
    OS 10.7.4
    NVIDIA GeForce GT8800
    NVIDIA Quadro 4000 both on GPU Driver 207.00.00.f06
    CUDA Driver 4.2.10
    All files are on a 2TB drive (7200rpm)
    Rendering to a 1TB drive (7200rpm)
    Corsair SSD 60gb Cache drive
    As an observation when I watch the frames counter ticking over, CS5 seems to steadily work it's way through the render at around less than a frame a second, CS6 seems to crank out 2-6 frames then hold for 30secs before working on another batch. It crawls to a halt near the end.
    Can anyone offer any help or advice?
    So far I'm not having a great time with my CS6 transition
    Thanks
    Rob
    Message was edited by: Bokeh Creative Ltd
    because of a Typo

    Thanks Rick - Yes what confused me was that it only took 45mins in CS5 even with MP 'on'
    Still having no joy with Ray Tracing though, even though I have a Quadro 4000 card, I get the 5070 error on start up. Any ideas?

  • Reduced Render Times i7

    Working a i7 920, 12 gb ram, sATA drives, Win 7 with Premiere Pro 1.5.
    Render time: 19 mins.
    P4 2.66, 1 gb ram, ide, XP Pro with Premiere Pro 1.5
    Render time: 3 hours.
    Pretty cool.
    Probabaly, with CS4 even faster.

    I'm not exactly sure how much functionality
    I will have working with Pro 1.5 in Win 7.
    I took an old program I had and re-rendered it to come up with the the above stated numbers.
    Who knows what will happen when I try to "mess" with the program.
    Thanks for all your help.

  • Slow render times with latest update

    Since updating to Premiere CC 7.1 I am experiencing extremly slow render speed with Magic Bullet Looks and .Filmconvert pro 2. When hitting enter to render it hangs for aout 10 seconds before starting. Then after each shot has been rendered it hangs again before continuing, What used to take around 20 minutes now takes 2 hours 34 minutes.
    Adobe, please can you show me how to roll back to version 7.0.1 as i don't have time to mess about with this.
    OS: Windows 7
    GTX 570 with latest driver (331.65)

    Hi captain,
    Check out the plug-ins manufacturer's web page and see if there are any updates for your plug-ins.
    Thanks,
    Kevin

  • Long render time with premiere pro CS5 lately,  help!

    lately my premiere pro CS5 render extremely slow
    i have a 6GB ram 64bit windows 7
    is it normal to render a 10 minutes quicktime/h264 codec in 5 hours?
    please take a note that this happened recently, so i think my pc spec. should not be the problem
    thanks in advance

    You start off with the wrong sequence settings. To resolve that, right click on a clip in the project panel and select 'New Sequence from Clip". That will give you the correct sequence setting for your source material.
    When exporting, never use QuiRcktime, since it is a 32 bit application, plagued with numerous severe problems, hence the name. Use plain 64 bit H.264 codec for exporting. If you use Maximum Render Quality, your export can take many times longer than without that checked.
    Your memory and presumably the rest of your system (please give details) is not up to this task, especially not when you start with the wrong sequence settings, export with a 32 bit codec and have MRQ turned on.

  • Reduce execution time with selects

    Hi,
    I have to reduce the execution time in a report, most of the consumed time is in the select query.
    I have a table, gt_result:
    DATA: BEGIN OF gwa_result,
          tknum            LIKE vttk-tknum,
          stabf            LIKE vttk-stabf,
          shtyp            LIKE vttk-shtyp,
          route            LIKE vttk-route,
          vsart            LIKE vttk-vsart,
          signi            LIKE vttk-signi,
          dtabf            LIKE vttk-dtabf,
          vbeln            LIKE likp-vbeln,
          /bshm/le_nr_cust LIKE likp-/bshm/le_nr_cust,
          vkorg            LIKE likp-vkorg,
          werks            LIKE likp-werks,
          regio            LIKE kna1-regio,
          land1            LIKE kna1-land1,
          xegld            LIKE t005-xegld,
          intca            LIKE t005-intca,
          bezei            LIKE tvrot-bezei,
          bezei1           LIKE t173t-bezei,
          fecha(10) type c.
    DATA: END OF gwa_result.
    DATA: gt_result LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF gwa_result.
    And the select query is this:
      SELECT ktknum kstabf kshtyp kroute kvsart ksigni
    k~dtabf
             lvbeln l/bshm/le_nr_cust lvkorg lwerks   nregio nland1 oxegld ointca
                 tbezei   ttbezei
      FROM vttk AS k
      INNER JOIN vttp  AS p ON ktknum = ptknum
      INNER JOIN likp  AS l ON pvbeln = lvbeln
      INNER JOIN kna1  AS n ON lkunnr = nkunnr
      INNER JOIN t005  AS o ON nland1 = oland1
      INNER JOIN tvrot AS t ON troute = kroute AND t~spras = sy-langu
      INNER JOIN t173t AS tt ON ttvsart = kvsart AND tt~spras = sy-langu
      INTO TABLE gt_result
      WHERE ktknum IN s_tknum AND ktplst IN s_tplst AND k~route IN s_route AND
         k~erdat BETWEEN s_erdat-low AND s_erdat-high AND
         l~/bshm/le_nr_cust <> ' '    "IS NOT NULL
         AND k~stabf = 'X'
         AND ktknum NOT IN ( SELECT tktknum  FROM vttk AS tk
                             INNER JOIN vttp AS tp ON tktknum = tptknum
                             INNER JOIN likp AS tl ON tpvbeln = tlvbeln
                             WHERE l~/bshm/le_nr_cust IS NULL )
         AND k~tknum NOT IN ( SELECT tknum FROM /bshs/ssm_eship )
         AND ( o~xegld = ' '
               OR ( o~xegld = 'X' AND
                    ( ( n~land1 = 'ES'
                        AND ( nregio = '51' OR nregio = '52'
                              OR nregio =  '35' OR nregio =  '38' ) )
                               OR n~land1 = 'ESC' ) )
                      OR ointca = 'AD' OR ointca = 'GI' ).
    Does somebody know how to reduce the execution time ?.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Try to remove the join. Use seperate selects as shown in example below and for the sake of selection, keep some key fields in your internal table.
    Then once your final table is created, you can copy the table into GT_FINAL which will contain only fields you need.
    EX
    data : begin of it_likp occurs 0,
             vbeln like likp-vbeln,
             /bshm/le_nr_cust like likp-/bshm/le_nr_cust,
             vkorg like likp-vkorg,
             werks like likp-werks,
             kunnr likr likp-kunnr,
           end of it_likp.
    data : begin of it_kna1 occurs 0,
           kunnr like...
           regio....
           land1...
          end  of it_kna1 occurs 0,
    Select tknum stabf shtyp route vsart signi dtabf
    from VTTP
    into table gt_result
    WHERE tknum IN s_tknum AND
          tplst IN s_tplst AND
          route IN s_route AND
          erdat BETWEEN s_erdat-low AND s_erdat-high.
    select vbeln /bshm/le_nr_cust
           vkorg werks kunnr
           from likp
           into table it_likp
           for all entries in gt_result
           where vbeln = gt_result-vbeln.
    select kunnr
           regio
           land1
           from kna1
           into it_kna1
           for all entries in it_likp.
    similarly for other tables.
    Then loop at gt result and read corresponding table and populate entire record :
    loop at gt_result.
    read table it_likp where vbeln = gt_result-vbeln.
    if sy-subrc eq 0.
      move corresponding fields of it_likp into gt_result.
      gt_result-kunnr = it_likp-kunnr.
      modify gt_result.
    endif.
    read table it_kna1 where kunnr = gt_result-vbeln.
    if sy-subrc eq 0.
      gt_result-regio = it-kna1-regio.
      gt_result-land1 = it-kna1-land1.
      modify gt_result.
    endif.
    endloop.

  • How to reduce render time?

    I have created two separate events in FCP X that are both completely done and fully rendered.  I now want to combine them onto one timeline and then send them to Compressor to burn a DVD for a client.  It is frustrating to have to wait for this new 30 minute event/timeline to render as I have not changed a thing.  Is there a better workflow in order to avoid these long renders?

    you should be able to copy, paste one project into the other without re rendering as long as they are already rendered, you can make one project into a compound clip first then copy paste that into the other timeline or paste it in without making it a compound clip. I do it all the time, as long as you don't change anything after you paste it in, then send the newley created  extended project directly to compressor to create your mpg2 files for dvd.

  • Reducing Rendering time with JTable

    Hi,
    Currently I have an application which builds a JTable from a fetched database resultset. The resultset contains a date field, which is shown in the JTable as well. I roughly have 100,000 records which are placed in the JTable.
    Now for the problem. I have a custom renderer which renders each row in a specific font and a black foreground colour. However, when the date field is in the future the row should have a grey foreground colour. My application does this perfectly, however the loading time is extremely long in comparison with not doing this check.
    The reason for this lies at the renderer. After the database has fetched he records, my application checks which records are in the future and builds a list. This list contains the rows that should be coloured grey. Building this list takes a long time though since every row has to be checked. Is there a way to make this more efficient? To sum it up, this is what happends:
    *Database fetches all records
    *Application checks which rows are in the future
    *Application builds a "future"-list, containing the rownumber which row should be coloured grey.
    *The list gets passed to the renderer
    *The renderer checks if the "future"-list contains the rownumber.  (intensive operation, this is where most processing time goes)
    *If the list contains the number the row is coloured grey. Otherwise the row is coloured black.
    Thanks

    First read camicker's column, he's got good and solid knowledge, and I don't want to get into it with him again. Once you get your renderer fixed, what are you going to do about your TableModel. Are you using AbstractTableModel or DefaultTableModel and why. Your project requires some thought about this data storage too.
    Note: You may incorporate into your app SQL and a ResutSet to only select certain rows of data to begin with, instead of retrieving all records all the time. I mean... since you are using a database?
    Edited by: pierrot_2 on Feb 21, 2009 11:35 AM

  • Why such long render times with SD footage?

    I'm putting together a three-minute video for my FSAE racing team. Footage is standard-def video from three different cameras we had on-car. I have the videos set up as a multiclip for about two minutes in the timeline; FCP says the render will take about an hour to complete. No effects, just multiple angles. CPU utilization is at 120%.
    Is there any reason in particular why FCP isn't utilizing more processing power?
    (Mac pro, Octo 2.8ghz, 10gb ram)

    What codec is this said footage?
    Shane

  • Using IOC with Factory Design pattern

    Say I have two different data sources, one XML and another Database.I have 2 DAO's corresponding to the 2 data source and a DAOFactory to get the DAO.
    Now, I want to use IOC from the service layer to get appropriate DAO. Using DAOFactory will break IOC.
    Will it be a good idea to inject DAOFactory into the service layer?
    I somehow don't feel comfortable in doing so, Factories seem to be more or less like utility and injecting utility into the service does not seem a good idea to me.
    Please let me know how to get around this situation.
    Regards,
    Joshua

    JoshuaAntony wrote:
    Say I have two different data sources, one XML and another Database.I have 2 DAO's corresponding to the 2 data source and a DAOFactory to get the DAO.
    Now, I want to use IOC from the service layer to get appropriate DAO. Using DAOFactory will break IOC.
    Will it be a good idea to inject DAOFactory into the service layer?
    I somehow don't feel comfortable in doing so, Factories seem to be more or less like utility and injecting utility into the service does not seem a good idea to me.To me, this sounds like you're getting bogged down in abstract terminology and worrying about vague "rules" rather than considering the problem. Do you even need a DAOFactory? As the other guy said, a DAO interface, implemented however you like, injected where it's needed, is nice and simple, and avoids all those bothersome factories you probably don't need

  • Connecting - JavaFX + Servlets(??) + design patterns

    Hello
    I'm a total noob in JEE world so I'm sorry if I'm asking for sth really basic.
    I would like to connect my JavaFX application with a simplest there is JEE-server. My guess is - Servlets (a good guess?). But before I start, here are some obstructions I need to face. The general goal of this whole project is to test few (around 5) JEE design patterns. It's because of my science project: "The use/usage of JEE design patterns in creating web applications". So what's the JavaFX for? My promotor asked for an application that would be handy for my College. So again what is going to be done :
    - connect the JFX app with JEE server
    - test the whole project with Cobertura, Checkstyle, Apache JMeter, Findbug, Cobertura, PMD/CMd and so on
    - refactor the project with 5 design patterns. I think I'll try to use: DAO, Intercepting Filter, any suggestions what more?
    - test again
    - compair test results. Make conclusion on the thesis.
    As for now I've found JFX class that could be used to communicate:
    http://java.sun.com/javafx/1.2/docs/api/javafx.io.http/javafx.io.http.HttpRequest.html and other from javafx.io.http
    I'm looking for the simplest way because I don't have a lot of time! :(((( So, is there a book, tool or a tutorial explaining how to quickly and simply do the stuff above?
    What I have installed:
    - winXP SP3 (linux and Eclipse still are crappy with JFX)
    - Netbeans 6.7.1 with JavaFX and now I've installed additionally:
         - Java Web Applications
         - Sun Java System Web Server 7.0
         - EJB and EAR
    Anything else I need?

    Why don't using ejb for remote client?
    It can be simpliest, you avoid web tier dev in the server and http on the fx side.
    Any version requieried for the JEE? With the sixth one, few annotations and just concentrate on your job, very nice.

Maybe you are looking for