Referencial integrity
Hello
I can insert a record into parent table even there is no record in child table.
However,if the child row doesnt exist, I cannot update a parent table.
What is the reason for this and what to do to overcome?
idle> select * from p;
X
2
7
15
19
20
idle> select * from c;
X
2
7
19
15
idle> update p set x=21 where x=15;
update p set x=21 where x=15
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02292: integrity constraint (SYS.SYS_C004407) violated - child record found
The Child Record exists when you are updating the parent table p.
Tip:Always Name your constraints
Here is what you should do
SQL> alter table p drop primary key cascade ;
Table altered.
SQL> alter table p add constraint pk_p$x primary key (x) ;
Table altered.
SQL> alter table c add constraint fk_c$x foreign key (x) references p(x) deferrable;
Table altered.
SQL> alter session set constraint = deferred ;
Session altered.
SQL> update p set x=21 where x=15;
1 row updated.
SQL> update c set x=21 where x=15;
1 row updated.
SQL> select * from p ;
X
2
7
19
20
21
SQL> select * from c;
X
2
7
21
19
SQL> alter session set constraint = immediate ;
Session altered.HTH
SS
Similar Messages
-
How to know which table has got referencial integrity constraint
Dear All,
How can i know which table has got referencial integrity constraint on which table ?
Ex : Department id column is a primary key in departments table whereas it is a foreign key in employees table. From where can i find the info regarding the relation between employees and departments table ?
Waiting for your reply.
Regards,
Shyamyou can use dba_constraints or all_constraints to help.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/server.101/b10755/statviews_1037.htm
Example:
select owner, CONSTRAINT_NAME,CONSTRAINT_TYPE,TABLE_NAME from dba_constraints where R_OWNER=':A' and R_CONSTRAINT_NAME=':B'
A = owner of primary key
B = constraint name (primary key name) -
Can any explain me what is purpose of Referencial integration check in the communication structure.
refrential entry check means verifying the consistency of data coming from various sources.
Check the below link for more info:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/3a/14c43bb7137503e10000000a11402f/content.htm
Regards,
Kamaljeet Singh
Message was edited by: Kamaljeet Singh -
Design issue - Historical data - referencial integrity
Hi,
I dont know if this is the right place to post this question, but
I would to like know about the design issues in storing historical data .
I have a historical table about events ( notifications, alarms, etc ).
In historical table would I store fields with foreign key to the master table ( device table ) ?
In this design , how handle then updates ( remove record ) to the master table ?
would I have a trigger to update the historical table too ? Or I mustn' t permit
updates in master table primary Keys ?
And about no store The foreign keys in the historical data ?
What are the disvantages of this model ?
Thank you,
FariaFaria,
The answer depends on why you want historical data.
Is the historical data to be used for auditing or legal purposes?
Are you trying to move historical data for performance reasons?
Is there some other purpose?
If you're doing this for auditing purposes, I don't recommend using foreign keys since you won't easily be able to capture delete activity.
I mostly use Designer for all of our designs and typically will turn on server side journaling for this purpose. Designer will then generate the journaling tables and write the triggers to manage the whole process. You don't even need to be a programmer to figure it out.
Let me know back if this isn't your purpose or you need clarification.
Thanks, George -
Basic questions on data modeling
Hi experts,
I have some basic questions regarding data modeling within MDM. I understand the available table types and the concept of lookup fields. I know that the MDM data modeling concept is different to the relational concept. But having a strong database background my first step was to design a relational data model which I would like to transfer to a MDM repository. Unfortunately I didn't found good information material on this. So here are some questions maybe you can help me:
1) Is it the right approach to model n:m relationships with multivalued lookup fields? E.g. main table Users with lookup field from subtable SapAccounts (a user can have accounts in different SAP systems, that means more than one account).
2) Has a record always be unique in MDM repositories (e.g. should we use Auto ID's in every table or do we have to mark a combination of fields as unique)? Is a composite key of 2 or more fields represented with marking these fields as unique?
3) The concept of relationships in MDM is only based on relationships between single records (not valid for all records in a table)? Is it necessary to define all relationships similar to the relational data model in MDM? Is there something similar to referential integrity in MDM?
4) Is it possible to change the main table to a sub table later on if we realize that it has also to be used as a lookup table for another table (when extending the data model) or do we have to create a new repository from scratch?
Thank you for your answers.
Regards, bdYes you are correct. It is almost difficult to map relational database to mdm one. But again MDM is not 'just' a database. It holds much more 'master' information as compared to any relational db.
1) Is it the right approach to model n:m relationships with multivalued lookup fields? E.g. main table Users with lookup field from subtable SapAccounts (a user can have accounts in different SAP systems, that means more than one account).
Yes Here you need to use MV look up tables or can also try Qualifier tables if it gets more complex
2) Has a record always be unique in MDM repositories (e.g. should we use Auto ID's in every table or do we have to mark a combination of fields as unique)? Is a composite key of 2 or more fields represented with marking these fields as unique?
Concept of uniqueness differs here that you also have something called Display Fields (DF). A combination of DF can also be treated as Unique one. For instance while importing records if you select these DF as a combination, you will eliminate any possible of duplicates based on this combination. Auto Id is one of the ways to have a unique id once record is within MDM. While you use UF or DF to eliminate any possible duplicates at import level
3) The concept of relationships in MDM is only based on relationships between single records (not valid for all records in a table)? Is it necessary to define all relationships similar to the relational data model in MDM? Is there something similar to referential integrity in MDM?
Hmm... good one. Referencial Integrity. What I assume you are talking is that if you have relationships between tables then removing a record will not be possible as it is a foreign key for some record. Here MDM does not allow that. As Relationships within MDM are physical and not conceptual. For instance material can have components. Now if material does not exist then any relationship to components is not worthwile to maintain. Hence relationshsip is eliminated. While in relational model relationships are more conceptual. Hence with MDM usage of lookups and main table you do not need to maintain these kind of relationships on your own.
4) Is it possible to change the main table to a sub table later on if we realize that it has also to be used as a lookup table for another table (when extending the data model) or do we have to create a new repository from scratch?
No. It is not possible to convert main table. There is only one main table and it cannot be changed.
I went for the same option but it did not work. What I suggest is to look up your legacy system one by one and see what fields in general can be classified as Master, Reference, Transactional - You will start getting answers immediately. -
Cascade or delete in database server, why if my EJB do it for me??
Hi,
I am in design phase of a database for my j2EE application. In the database desing i have some relationships entities, that have foreign keys. I have several options about foreign keys in the relationships, cascade deletes, restrict .... all in my database server.
But, when i am reading the referencial integrity of the entity EJBs CMP relationships, the entity beans make the cascade deletes automaticaly for maintain the relationsships.
Need i make my relationships in my database server with cascade delete options or leave it for my application server???
Another one, if i make relationships in my database server, why i need do it in my entity beans???
tanks, sorry for my poor englishHi Markus,
Tanks for your answer, if this tip only for entity beans with CMP???
For example, if i have some entity beans, one with CMP and other with JDO, or for example, an entity beans that use CMP and JDO for access to few tables (i dont know that it is possible or it a good design), how can i design the relationships update/delete cascades in my database server, all entity beans persistence types support his referencial integrity ?? if this if true i think that i forget the relationships updates/deletes cascades in my database server.
At this moment, i dont know what type of persistence i will use in my application server. I dont undertand yet wath approach i must follow, i design my database and after design my entity beans over this database or i must foget my database and beging with entity beans design first .... i have a big problem, i need read a lot of more.
Something for help me???
Very, very thanks -
(this has been posted to the XML list, but I´m using both Oracle DB and BDB XML, so I'd like to hear a different opnion. Sorry if this is repeated.)
Hello,
I'm in the process of designing a relatively large XML DB System and I'm having some doubts regarding the best structure for the main XML document, in order to optimize search as well as organizing the document in such a way that is not relational (as I usually tend to think when designing an XML DB, for background reasons).
Basically, we're trying to create a single XML document, but there's a lot of information spread in other entities and tables. We´re trying to minimize the tables and aggregate as much information as possible in a single XML file, to avoid any "relational" query, but also without getting redundant. To illustrate what I mean, here is an example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doc>
<people>
<person>
<name> Johnny </name>
<address> St. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
<person>
<name> Tom </name>
<address> Mr. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
<person>
<name> Cat </name>
<address> Dr. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
</people>
<vehicle>
<driver>
<!-- redundant information, like above -->
<person>
<name> Johnny </name>
<address> St. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
</driver>
</vehicle>
</doc>As you can see above, we have some redundant information repeated. Also, most importantly, I have no way of having some referencial integrity. Now, in the next example, I have tried adding a reference, using an ID node in the person element, in order to avoid the redundancy and get some integrity:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doc>
<people>
<person id="10">
<name> Johnny </name>
<address> St. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
<person id="11">
<name> Tom </name>
<address> Mr. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
<person id="12">
<name> Cat </name>
<address> Dr. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
</people>
<vehicle>
<driver>
<!-- storing just an ID reference> -->
<person>
<id>10</id>
</person>
</driver>
</vehicle>
</doc>But that's my point: am I thinking "relational" here? Is there any other way to solve this, in a more efficient and secure way?
best regards,
- BrenoHi Breno,
Why not get rid of the list of people altogether, and simply have vehicles with drivers? Then when you really need the list of people, you can just do a query like this:
collection()//personOr why not place a vehicle element inside of a person element, and get rid of the list of vehicles? Of course, it might be that you need to model a system where a vehicle has more than one driver, in which case maybe what you already have is better.
With XML, it's not that the old "relational" way of structuring data is wrong - it's just that there could be a simpler way to do things in certain circumstances - namely exhibiting relationship by containment, rather than by reference.
John -
Hello,
I'm in the process of designing a relatively large XML DB System and I'm having some doubts regarding the best structure for the main XML document, in order to optimize search as well as organizing the document in such a way that is not relational (as I usually tend to think when designing an XML DB, for background reasons).
Basically, we're trying to create a single XML document, but there's a lot of information spread in other entities and tables. We´re trying to minimize the tables and aggregate as much information as possible in a single XML file, to avoid any "relational" query, but also without getting redundant. To illustrate what I mean, here is an example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doc>
<people>
<person>
<name> Johnny </name>
<address> St. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
<person>
<name> Tom </name>
<address> Mr. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
<person>
<name> Cat </name>
<address> Dr. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
</people>
<vehicle>
<driver>
<!-- redundant information, like above -->
<person>
<name> Johnny </name>
<address> St. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
</driver>
</vehicle>
</doc>As you can see above, we have some redundant information repeated. Also, most importantly, I have no way of having some referencial integrity. Now, in the next example, I have tried adding a reference, using an ID node in the person element, in order to avoid the redundancy and get some integrity:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doc>
<people>
<person id="10">
<name> Johnny </name>
<address> St. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
<person id="11">
<name> Tom </name>
<address> Mr. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
<person id="12">
<name> Cat </name>
<address> Dr. Street, 444 </address>
</person>
</people>
<vehicle>
<driver>
<!-- storing just an ID reference> -->
<person>
<id>10</id>
</person>
</driver>
</vehicle>
</doc>But that's my point: am I thinking "relational" here? Is there any other way to solve this, in a more efficient and secure way?
best regards,
- BrenoYou may like to take a look at HyperJAXB that I have used recently for a structure similar to yours. In HyperJAXB, you use JAXB binding with Hibernate on relational databas. So that you can get the results as XML document but you can also leverage relational database structure. And you can control all that without writing any code by adding annotations to XML schema document.
-- Deha Peker -
Hi
In my customer master data, I have a customer group field attached to each customer along with other fields/ attributes of customer. Now i have data going to a cube through a routine in the transformation, which works fine.
Now i see a problem. A particular customer number is not getting updated with the customer group field in Cube. All other customers are getting their data. Only this customer is not getting updated with that mandatory field. Earlier, this customer was not assigned a cust group in R/3. Sometime back, they have corrected that, and even in BI customer master data, i see all the fields filled for that customer.
But its failing to upload into the cube. Any ideas why its failing ? My master data is also activated everyday.
thx
venkatHi Venkat,
Cust Grp is being updated through routine.
If check the routine, also check how may records exists in the customer master for ther particular customer. do you have any compounded objects for the customer master
There is a check box in the transformation for referencial integrity check.
Regards
Ajay -
Hi ,
Recently I was asked in an interview: When we would "IN" clause would be preferred to use over "EXISTS" clause. I had told the interviewer that "EXISTS" will ignore NULL value if the table has any. Wheter was I correct? Please provide valueable inputs.
Regards,
Achyut KS10390 wrote:
Check this Tom's post
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:953229842074
I think that was on a very old version of oracle (8.1.6). Oracle has changed a lot over the time.
Here is a simple example.
I have EMP and DEPT table like this. With relation defined as following
SQL> select table_name, constraint_name, constraint_type, r_constraint_name
2 from user_constraints
3 where table_name in ('EMP', 'DEPT');
TABLE_NAME CONSTRAINT_NAME C R_CONSTRAINT_NAME
DEPT DEPT_PK P
EMP EMP_FK_DEPT_NO R DEPT_PK
EMP EMP_PK PNow a simple query using IN
SQL> select * from emp e where e.deptno in (select d.deptno from dept d);
EMPNO ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL COM DEPTNO
7369 SMITH CLERK 7902 02-APR-81 2975 0 20
7499 ALLEN SALESMAN 7698 20-FEB-81 1600 300 30
7521 WARD SALESMAN 7698 22-FEB-81 1250 500 30
7566 JONES MANAGER 7839 02-APR-81 2975 0 20
7654 MARTIN SALESMAN 7698 28-SEP-81 1250 1400 30
7698 BLAKE MANAGER 7839 01-MAY-81 2850 0 30
7782 CLARK MANAGER 7839 09-JUN-81 2450 0 10
7788 SCOTT ANALYST 7566 19-APR-87 3000 0 20
7839 KING PRESIDENT 17-NOV-81 5000 0 10
7844 TURNER SALESMAN 7698 08-SEP-81 1500 0 30
7876 ADAMS CLERK 7788 23-MAY-87 1100 0 20
11 rows selected.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID f7h123zffyf6y, child number 0
select * from emp e where e.deptno in (select d.deptno from dept d)
Plan hash value: 2872589290
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 2 (100)| |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 11 | 418 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - filter("E"."DEPTNO" IS NOT NULL)
18 rows selected.The amazing thing is that the DEPT table is not scanned at all. I guess the CBO is using the referencial
integrity to determine scanning fo EMP table would be sufficient.
Now using EXISTS
SQL> select * from emp e where exists (select null from dept d where d.deptno = e.deptno);
EMPNO ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL COM DEPTNO
7369 SMITH CLERK 7902 02-APR-81 2975 0 20
7499 ALLEN SALESMAN 7698 20-FEB-81 1600 300 30
7521 WARD SALESMAN 7698 22-FEB-81 1250 500 30
7566 JONES MANAGER 7839 02-APR-81 2975 0 20
7654 MARTIN SALESMAN 7698 28-SEP-81 1250 1400 30
7698 BLAKE MANAGER 7839 01-MAY-81 2850 0 30
7782 CLARK MANAGER 7839 09-JUN-81 2450 0 10
7788 SCOTT ANALYST 7566 19-APR-87 3000 0 20
7839 KING PRESIDENT 17-NOV-81 5000 0 10
7844 TURNER SALESMAN 7698 08-SEP-81 1500 0 30
7876 ADAMS CLERK 7788 23-MAY-87 1100 0 20
11 rows selected.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID 8x38asybd9j0v, child number 0
select * from emp e where exists (select null from dept d where
d.deptno = e.deptno)
Plan hash value: 2610556560
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 3 (100)| |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS SEMI | | 11 | 451 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 11 | 418 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN| DEPT_PK | 4 | 12 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - access("D"."DEPTNO"="E"."DEPTNO")
21 rows selected.Here the DEPT table is scanned. So as already said it all deptnds. And need to tested for every case. -
The FAQ mentions that there are plugins for the execution of business rules. Does a plugin of this type exist for download somewhere or is it "build your own solution"?
iDS 5.0 is shipping with a few plugins (Attribute Uniqueness, Referencial Integrity, 7 bits clean...).
Otherwise, you can build your own solution by writing your own plugin... However, the plugin API is not supported with iDS 5.0 (it is with iDS 5.1).
Regards,
Ludovic. -
2 right joins - how to add another right join to this statement?
Hi all,
I had to upgrade my sql statement and add another column. my previuos sql was:
SELECT TR.ID, TA.Name, TR.idTarget, TR.Controller_Status, TR.previuosYear, TR.deduction, TR.idProduction, SUM(CSV.cur_amount) AS Accumulated, PD.Name AS PName, PD.type_2, CL.ToRange AS growth
FROM agent AS TA, production_name AS PD, calculation AS CL, target AS TR
RIGHT JOIN csv_production AS CSV ON CSV.ID=TR.ID AND CSV.Production_Date BETWEEN '2006-10-01' AND '2006-12-31'
WHERE TA.ID=TR.ID
AND PD.idProduction = TR.idProduction
AND CL.idCalculation = ANY (SELECT MIN(idCalculation) FROM calculation GROUP BY idProduction)
AND TR.idProduction=CL.idProduction
AND TR.startDate= '2006-10-01' AND TR.endDate='2006-12-31'
GROUP BY CSV.IDI had to add this line:
RIGHT JOIN csv_net_production AS CSV_net ON CSV_net.IATA=TR.IATA AND CSV_net.Production_Date BETWEEN '2006-10-01' AND '2006-12-31' my end result looks like this:
SELECT TR.ID, TA.Name, TR.idTarget, TR.Controller_Status, TR.previuosYear, TR.deduction, TR.idProduction, SUM(CSV.cur_amount) AS Accumulated, SUM(CSV_net.cur_amount) AS net_Accumulated, PD.Name AS PName, PD.type_2, CL.ToRange AS growth
FROM agent AS TA, production_name AS PD, calculation AS CL, target AS TR
RIGHT JOIN csv_production AS CSV ON CSV.ID=TR.ID AND CSV.Production_Date BETWEEN '2006-10-01' AND '2006-12-31'
RIGHT JOIN csv_net_production AS CSV_net ON CSV_net.ID=TR.ID AND CSV_net.Production_Date BETWEEN '2006-10-01' AND '2006-12-31'
WHERE TA.ID=TR.ID
AND PD.idProduction = TR.idProduction
AND CL.idCalculation = ANY (SELECT MIN(idCalculation) FROM calculation GROUP BY idProduction)
AND TR.idProduction=CL.idProduction
AND TR.startDate= '2006-10-01' AND TR.endDate='2006-12-31'
GROUP BY CSV.IDBUT!!! the accumulated (Accumulated, net_Accumulated,) is multiplied by 3, which means that I must add another WHERE statement (i think?!)
thanks for any pointershow do u relate csv_production ,csv_net_production ?
the one comparison i viewed is TR.ID against the IDs of these 2 tables
I mean
is there any relationship between these 2 tables?
specifically
is there any referencial integrity or like constraint exists between these 2 tables?
if so u can write a where condition csv_production.ID=csv_net_production.ID -
Error in customer_update FM
Hi,
When i am trying to add a new record using the customer_update FM into KNVP table it says system error. Can some one tell me what the error is for ?
Thanks in advance.Hi Subbu,
Most of these update function modules have a logic of importing and exporting data from and to memory. So unless you did all that this function module is expecting, it will not work, because of issues with referencial integrity and what not.
The interface of the function module is not the only thing that it expects. So please don't use such function modules in your custom code. Use either one of the ones Rob suggested, or find something that is not a update function module.
It looks like you are trying to insert a customer partner into the table. You cannot have a partner that is not in KNA1. The partner record has to be created as a customer first and then only you can use that customer as a partner. Never try to insert records into some tables, even if you are using a standard SAP function module. All these update function modules will mostly do inserts in a sequence and nothing else. So if you are using something in the middle and the sequence is broken then your data will not be in sync.
Srinivas -
Foreign Keys involving two different databases/schemas
Hi -- I'm wondering if it's possible to set a foreign key that involves tables that live in different databases/schemas. And, if it is possible, is it a horrible design idea?
Thanks,
~Christinecav0227, you have asked two different two part questions.
1 - Is it possible to set up FK that span owners and is this good design?
Yes, it is possilbe and there if the data is related then yes it is good design. We like to minimize the number of object owners in our system and use a table naming standard where the first two or three letters of the table name represent a system code: ap, ar, gl for accounts receivable, accounts payable, and general ledger. Other may prefer to have an AP owner, AR owner, and a GL owner.
Ownership has no direct bearing on quality of design. If the tables are related then you should define the FK no matter who the owner is.
2 - Is it possible to define FK to remote (distributed) tables and is the good design? The answer is no. FK cannot reference remote objects. To enforce referencial integrity accross databases via the database, rather than in the application, requires the use of table triggers.
As far as good design that depends on why the data is remote and why the tables need to be linked. There are issues related to availability, recovery, and performance when data is distributed. Having such a relationship could be good design or bad design depending on if all the inter-related factors have been considered.
IMHO -- Mark D Powell -- -
Create Test data using T-SQl script for each row
Hi team,
I am looking for a sql code snippet which read data from below table
UserId username contact
1 Anil 111
2 Sunil 222
and insert data to below table with some test data appending sequence number 1,2,3 for only City and Email. Both are different tables
and does not have any referencial integrity
No of records inserted for user is configurable for example count = 3
Username City Email
Anil city1 email1
Anil city2 email2
Anil city3 email3
Sunil city1 email1
Sunil city2 email2
Sunil city3 email3DECLARE @cnt INT=3
DECLARE @Users TABLE(UserId INT, UserName VARCHAR(99),Contact INT)
INSERT INTO @Users VALUES
(1,'Anil',111),
(2,'Sunil',222)
SELECT UserName,'city'+CAST(num AS varchar(10)) city FROM @Users
CROSS APPLY
SELECT TOP(@cnt) number +1 AS num
FROM master..spt_values
WHERE type = 'P') AS Der
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence
Maybe you are looking for
-
Media Browser does not load iTunes Library
I was on GarageBand today and was trying to drag a song from my iTunes (via Media Browser) and nothing showed under my iTunes (playlists, songs, etc.) and I have over 4000 items on iTunes. I also was trying to upload an attachment on GMail and media
-
Have most recent macbook pro connected to thunderbolt via thunderbolt cable. Occasionally when I close my laptop the thunderbolt display goes black and does not come back on---even in response to keyboard. Help
-
InDesign CS4 Win/Mac UID Allocation
Hello all:<br /><br /> I inherited this code from a programmer who is no longer with the company:<br /><br />URI URIPath;<br />URIUTILS -> IDFileToURI(path, URIPath);<br />// Set the IImportResourceCmdData Interface's data:<br />InterfacePtr<IImpor
-
Register with Shared Services 11.1.1.4 / AIX / WAS
Hello Admins, I'm working on an installation of EPM Interactive reporting. The environment is AIX 6.1 with manual deployment in Websphere Application Server 6.1. Shared services manual deployment was successful and comes up OK. Moving onto the Worksp
-
Developer toolbox, Editable drop down encoding problem
Hi I'm using DW CS3 with Developer toolbox, PHP MySql. Problem is that Editable drop down show national characters wrongly. actually its inserts data in to database with wrong encoding. I use encoding "charset=utf-8", all other forms working fine. On