Regarding join tables

Hi all,
Can you give the difference between inner join and outer join
thanks&regards
venkat

Hi,
Check this..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/cf/21ec77446011d189700000e8322d00/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/f1/713c3b35703079e10000000a114084/frameset.htm

Similar Messages

How can I pass multiple condition in where clause with the join table?

Hi:
I need to collect several inputs at run time, and query the record according to the input.
How can I pass multiple conditions in where clause with the join table?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Regards,
TD

If you are using SQL-Plus or Reports you can use lexical parameters like:
SELECT * FROM emp &condition;
When you run the query it will ask for value of condition and you can enter what every you want. Here is a really fun query:
SELECT &columns FROM &tables &condition;
But if you are using Forms. Then you have to change the condition by SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY.
Best of luck!

MVC: Create a view which populates two (or more) joined tables in a single view table

I am beginner in MVC and I would like to create a view which populates two (or more) joined tables in a single view table as described below.
I have two tables:
1 - Bloggers: - bloggerID (int);
                    - bloggerName (string)
2 - Blogs: - blogID (int);
bloggerID (int);
                - blogTitle (string);
                - blogImage (string)
A blogger can have one or more blogs while one blog must be related to only one blogger.
I would like to have a view table on my webpage as the following:
Blogger Name
Blog Title
Blog Image
Noris Gang
Virus
virus.jpg
Noris Gang
Desktops
desktop.jpg
Gauthier
Books
books.png
John Leon
NNNMHJhjdhj
Nmbj.jpg
I'm using MVC 4 (or at least 3).
Thanks for your help.

Hello,
From your description, it is not very clear that what you mean about the View, if it means the View concept in database as SQL Server, your required view should be as below:
Create view
as
Select Bloggers.bloggerName, Bloggers.blogTitle, Bloggers.blogImage
From Bloggers join Blogs on Bloggers.bloggerID = Blogs. bloggerID
If it means the UI view in MVC concept, I suggest you could ask it on the MVC forum:
http://forums.asp.net/1146.aspx
Regards.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

What are the Pros and Cons while joining tables at DF and Universe level

Hi Experts,
I am new to Data federator designer. I need help on the below.
Could you please let me know the Pros and Cons while joining the source tables in data federator
And While joining the DF target tables in universe designer.
Regards,
Gana

Hi,
1. I have created target tables based on source tables with one to one mapping and then join all target tables in universe.
Ex: Source tables: Infocube text tables, fact tables and 3rd party data base table
Target tables:Target tables are same as source tables
--- Yes this is the way to create target Tables and join them in the universe.These target Tables gives you the flexibility like in future your requirement is to add one more object based on some calculation which is not possible in the universe so that time you can create one more column in the target table and do the calculation. at the same time if you are using source table you can not do anything.
2. Created single target table with all objects of source tables and merged all sources tables data.
Ex: Source tables: Infocube text tables, fact tables and 3rd party data base table
Target table: Single table.
--- This is bit complex structure to merge all tables data in the one target table.in this situation you have to put more efforts and it is more complex.basically this type of target table is useful when you are merging data by multiple source into single or creating one target table based on the union of tables by adding two mapping rules or more and you can not join tables in universe.
Better approach is first 1. create target tables based on the source tables and join them in the universe.
Thanks,
Amit

Joining table in GRC 10 Process Control

Hi,
I am trying to create a new Data Source in GRC 10 Process Control. I need to join tables AGR_1251 (main table) and AGR_USERS. I am selecting AGR_1251 as main table. However, nothing comes up when I try to select AGR_USERS as 'Related Table'. On searching AGR_USERS , the system does not return any tables. Both are transparent tables and hence can be joined. I tried using both 'Reference Tables' as well as 'Dependent Tables' .
Can you also explain the difference between 'Reference Tables' and 'Dependent Tables'.
Regards,

Hi Amarnath,
tables is used to provide the table for the CURR(currency) or QUAN (quantity) fields.
In your case you want to join tables via foreign key(s) and therefore will have to use dependant tables.
The search for table AGR_USERS as dependant table for AGR_1251 will not return anything since the only table
referred as check table (for a foreign key) in AGR_1251 is AGR_DEFINES.
I would suggest to build your query based on defined check tables (see se11) of the needed tables (in this case AGR_DEFINE is the common point of both AGR_USERS & AGR_1251).
Kind regards,
Pascal

Joining tables rom HR master to documents DB?

SAP Gurus, I seek your wisdom
I'm trying to join tables in quickviewer that show the personal information of who created the doc.(particularly the names) in my purchasing doc. reports.
Is there a way to get data element ERNAM to link to USRID? Or some other method. Please help.

Hi David,
When saving documents using ArchiveLink, the actual document is saved in the Archive server and a reference link entry is saved in the link tables within SAP Basis. The link tables used are TOA01, TOA02, TOA03 or TOAHR. When saving the documents, a unique id is generated for each document, before storing the document in the archive system. This unique id is also stored in the link tables as DOCUMENT ID.
Using ArchiveLink, you can store any kind of document like JPG, FAX, DOC, PDF...etc. Each document class would have its own size, for eg., the same file stored as JPG file would be probably of the size 150KB, but the same file when stored as BMP file would probably be of the size 2500 KB.
ArchiveLink supports various kinds of connections to the Archive Server. You can use HTTP or RFC connection to the Archive server. Alternately, you can also store the documents in an R/3 Database repository.
SAP provides SAP CONTENT SERVER which uses HTTP type of connection. Depending on your business requirement, you can determine, what kind of documents you would mostly need to save. Once this has been determined, you can calculate how many documents you are planning to store approximately in a year. This would help you calculate the size of the server that you should be taking.
For searching documents, you can use some transactions like OAAD, OADR..etc. However, please note that ArchiveLink does not support text searches within the stored documents.
Please let me know if you should need any further information on this.
Best Regards,
Sindhu Sreedharan.

How to convert maintenance view 'v_t001k_assign' to inner join tables

Dear friends,
I found I could not select the fields of view 'v_t001k_assign' using SQL, and I found there are some tables joined together as below:
T001     MANDT     =     T001K     MANDT
T001     BUKRS     =     T001K     BUKRS
T001K     MANDT     =     TASSIGN_MM_T001W     MANDT
T001K     BWKEY     =     TASSIGN_MM_T001W     BWKEY
T001W     MANDT     =     TASSIGN_MM_T001W     MANDT
T001W     WERKS     =     TASSIGN_MM_T001W     WERKS
T001W_EXT     MANDT     =     TASSIGN_MM_T001W     MANDT
T001W_EXT     WERKS     =     TASSIGN_MM_T001W     WERKS_EXT
So how to convert this maintenance view 'v_t001k_assign' to inner join tables for SQL selection?
Thanks a lot!
Edited by: Qiwei Yin on May 27, 2009 10:35 AM

Hi,
You should use the 'Search help exit' to select the data for yourself from the database. Go into the search help maintenance screen and press F1 on field 'search help exit'; follow the links. There is actually a pretty good documentation.
Regards, Gerd Rother

Joining tables across databases in OBIEE Physical Layer

I was facing this problem of joining tables across databases in Physical layer of OBIEE admin tool.
I had a requirement to combine two tables from 2 different databases A and B respectively. I had created one database object (OBIEE Object) in the physical layer and I had created two connection pools under that pointing to the required databases. I was able to view the data (right click on the table object --> popup menu option "View Data" ) though I had to go through the "Select connection Pool" window and select the required connection pool. I was able to join the tables and was able to complete the star schema in BMM and bring them up to the presentation layer. Conistency check was also successful. Everything went fine so far.
But when I started building the report, I started getting error whenever I chose the table which was supposed to be queried by using the second connection pool. The error message was something like "table or view does not exist at OCI call OCIStmtExecute". I assume that this was happening because the systm was not able to understand which connection pool to choose (because there were two pools defined under one database object) and by default the server was choosing the first one. If anybody is having a different opinion or definite information about this, kindly update with your reply.
I could resolve this problem after creating a separate database object with a separate connection pool defined under it, which points to the second database. Imported the required table under this database object. (Infact it was reverse. When I re-imported the table, OBIEE Admin tool, by default created its own database object and the connection pool separately for the imported table).
Once this was done then I went ahead as usual by joining the tables across these two different database objects and modelling was already done (ofcourse with a little more tweaking since the mapping had to be redone between BMM and Physical layers). Now I could build the report in the reporting layer without encountering any error.
Appreciate and welcome any further additions/updations/corrections regarding this issue(?).
-MMishra.
Edited by: user13483341 on Nov 29, 2011 8:20 AM
Edited by: user13483341 on Nov 29, 2011 8:20 AM
Edited by: user13483341 on Nov 29, 2011 8:24 AM

Hi Deepak, Thanks for your reply.
Appreciate if you can help me with another thread "possibility of multi-currency in OBIA 7.9.6.2 financial anlytics".
- MMishra.

Is it possible to place a view of joined tables into Shared Memory?

Thanks.

Tom,
The view of joined tables is just a possible selection method. You may select first and store all data in shared Memory. You better define a shared obkect with a read method and a buffer attribute.
The best thing you can do here is just to say what you want to do and why. It is always difficult to give a satifactory answer to an abstract question.
Regards,
Clemens

Pass Value From One Form to Another and Populate Join Table

I have a table “std_controls” and a table “actual_controls”. The standard controls table is updated with the expected business control or process. The actual controls table is updated with the control or business process the company actually
has in place. These two tables may be updated at different times by different individuals. Later I need to be able to map the actual controls to the standard controls. I have done this before using a join query which then matched the primary
keys and populates a new table with the joined keys. What I would like to be able to do is this: Have a form open, “form1” (which is where the standard controls are entered). The user could then click a button which would open another form,
“form2”, that listed all actual controls at that time from which they could choose. The user could then select the actual control on “form2” they wanted to map to the current standard control on “form1”. The user could select the actual control
on “form2” by selecting a check box. The effect of this mapping would populate my join table.
I have seen other posts that describe doing something similar, but I need more help on how to actually set it up. Thanks for your help.

Hi jdmcleod,
According to your description, I don’t understand clearly about your requirement.
But I think you could access “form1”/”form2”’s control in either of “form1” or “form2”, so you could have a button in “form1” or “form2”, then in the click event get these forms control’s value (e.g. checkbox) and update the database.
For example to access other form’s checkbox value:
Dim f As Form
Set f = Forms!OtherFrom
MsgBox f.Controls("Check11").Value
Regards
Starain
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

SAP QUERY(SQ03/02/02) - how to join tables

Hi MM Wizards,
I would like to know how to join tables EINE & A017 through SAP Query?
Thanks,
Kaveri

Hi Kaveri,
A017 is a pooled table. SAP Query does not support joins against Pooled tables. You should stick to transparent tables if you want to use Query.
You can do a direct read of A017, but you will just end up with a glorified SE16 display.
You could have a programmer write some ABAP and place it into the 'extras' section in SQ02 to grab the additional data that you want, but once you have decided to enlist the aid of an ABAPer, it is better just to write a custom Z program from scratch.
Regards,
DB49

SQVI - Join tables using similar fields (but not same)

Hi folks!
I would like to know if there is a way to do a join between two tables thru fields that are similar but not exactly the same. For example, I need to join tables EKKO and CDHDR, where the PO numbers do exist in both the tables (EKKO-EBELN and CDHDR-OBJECTID), but the fields are different. Is it possible to achieve such kind of a join?
Appreciate your help.
Regards,
Anwar.

>
Mohammad Anwar wrote:
though their data type is the same (CHAR).
unfortunately it is not enough... You have to select separately from the two tables and merge the data somehow in the program.

SQVI - Join Table Graphical display

Hello,
In SQVI, when I enter to change the join table, the screen enter into "Classical Table Join Definition".
How I can switch to "Graphical Table Join Definition"??
In SQ02 it is on the setting menu, but I didn't found how to do it in SQVI.
Could you help?
Thanks
BR
Nazim

Hai Nazmin,
In SQVI click the Basis Mode icon in the left top
Now it will show
Layout Mode
and in the right side
Export as : select the Graphics
and execute
Regards,
Mani

One-to-Many implemented with a join Table

Hello,
Is it possible to implement a One-to-Many relationship with a join table, just like
the Reference Implementation does.
Regards,
Jeroen

"Jeroen Ferdinandus" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Is it possible to implement a One-to-Many relationship with a join
table, just like the Reference Implementation does.Not with our CMP, you will have to resort to BMP for that.
Cedric

What is the better way to join table for ASE 12.5?

To join table with T-SQL, there are 2 options:
select * from tab1 a join tab2 b on a.id = b.id where x=y
select * from tab1a, tab2 b where a.id = b.id and x=y
this is only a syntax difference or there is a performance difference? which one is better for performance?

The first query (using the join clause) is the ANSI standard way of writing joins and is usually supported by all mainstream RDBMSs.
The second query is the T-SQL method of writing joins and may have limited re-usability with other RDBMSs.
In most cases which one you use is usually one of preference, ie, which ever one you're comfortable with.
From a technical perspective there are some join constructs that you cannot build with T-SQL joins, but can build with ANSI joins (eg, you may have problems in T-SQL with a table that you want to be both a) an inner table of an outer join and b) part of a equi/inner join).
Soooo, ANSI joins provide you a lot more flexibility in coding as well as portability (between other RDBMSs). But if you're going to work with ASE you'll still need to understand how T-SQL joins work as you'll see quite a lot of T-SQL join-based queries.

Regarding join tables

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for