Regd transaction locks

Hi,
How can I see all the transactions which are locked?
I know the query select * from v$lock, which is showing lot of information which is not understandale.
Thanks,

Here you have some scripts:
rem
rem FUNCTION: Report all DB locks
rem
column osuser format a15 heading 'User'
column session_id heading 'SID'
column mode_held format a20 heading 'Mode|Held'
column mode_requested format a20 heading 'Mode|Requested'
column lock_id1 format a10 heading 'Lock|ID1'
column lock_id2 format a10 heading 'Lock|ID2'
column type heading 'Type|Lock'
set feedback off echo off pages 59 lines 131
start title132 'Report on All Locks'
spool rep_out\&db\locks
select nvl(a.osuser,'SYS') osuser,b.session_id,type,
mode_held,mode_requested,
lock_id1,lock_id2
from sys.v_$session a, sys.dba_locks b
where
a.sid=b.session_id
order by 2
spool off
pause press enter/return to continue
clear columns
set feedback on echo on pages 22 lines 80
set headingsep ='|'
set lines 160
set pagesize 20
ttitle 'Database Locking Conflict Report'
btitle 'Mode Held = indicates the user holding the lock|Mode Request = indicates the user waiting on the later to finish to establish lock||** End of Locking Conflict Report **'
column username      format a10     heading 'User'
column terminal      format a15     heading 'Application|PC'
column object           format a15     heading     'Table'
column sql            format a15     heading 'SQL'
column sid           format 999     heading 'SID'
column lock_type      format a15     heading 'Lock|Type'
column mode_held      format a11     heading 'Mode|Held'
column mode_requested      format a10     heading 'Mode|Request'
column lock_id1      format a8     heading 'Lock ID1'
column lock_id2      format a8     heading 'Lock ID2'
column first_load_time  format a19     heading 'Requested'
break on lock_id1
select a.sid,
       username,
       terminal,
       decode(a.type,'MR', 'Media Recovery',
                  'RT', 'Redo Thread',
               'UN', 'User Name',
               'TX', 'Transaction',
               'TM', 'DML',
               'UL', 'PL/SQL User Lock',
               'DX', 'Distributed Xaction',
                 'CF', 'Control File',
               'IS', 'Instance State',
               'FS', 'File Set',
               'IR', 'Instance Recovery',
               'ST', 'Disk Space Transaction',
               'IR', 'Instance Recovery',
               'ST', 'Disk Space Transaction',
               'TS', 'Temp Segment',
               'IV', 'Library Cache Invalidation',
               'LS', 'Log Start or Switch',
               'RW', 'Row Wait',
               'SQ', 'Sequence Number',
               'TE', 'Extend Table',
               'TT', 'Temp Table', a.type) lock_type,
        decode(a.lmode,0, 'None',           /* Mon Lock equivalent */
   1, 'Null',           /* N */
   2, 'Row-S (SS)',     /* L */
   3, 'Row-X (SX)',     /* R */
   4, 'Share',          /* S */
   5, 'S/Row-X (SSX)',  /* C */
   6, 'Exclusive',      /* X */
   to_char(a.lmode)) mode_held,
   decode(a.request,
   0, 'None',           /* Mon Lock equivalent */
   1, 'Null',           /* N */
   2, 'Row-S (SS)',     /* L */
   3, 'Row-X (SX)',     /* R */
   4, 'Share',          /* S */
   5, 'S/Row-X (SSX)',  /* C */
   6, 'Exclusive',      /* X */
   to_char(a.request)) mode_requested,
   to_char(a.id1) lock_id1, to_char(a.id2) lock_id2,
   c.object object,
   d.sql_text sql,
   e.first_load_time
from v$lock a, v$session, v$access c, v$sqltext d, v$sqlarea e
   where (id1,id2) in
     (select b.id1, b.id2 from v$lock b where b.id1=a.id1 and
     b.id2=a.id2 and b.request>0) and
     a.sid = v$session.sid and
     a.sid = c.sid and
     d.address = v$session.sql_address and
     d.hash_value = v$session.sql_hash_value and
     d.address = e.address
order by a.id1, a.lmode desc
set headingsep ='|'
set lines 160
set pagesize 20
ttitle 'Database Locking Conflict Report'
btitle 'Mode Held = indicates the user holding the lock|Mode Request = indicates the user waiting on the later to finish to establish lock||** End of Locking Conflict Report **'
column username      format a10     heading 'User'
column terminal      format a15     heading 'Application|PC'
column object           format a15     heading     'Table'
column sql            format a15     heading 'SQL'
column sid           format 999     heading 'SID'
column lock_type      format a15     heading 'Lock|Type'
column mode_held      format a11     heading 'Mode|Held'
column mode_requested      format a10     heading 'Mode|Request'
column lock_id1      format a8     heading 'Lock ID1'
column lock_id2      format a8     heading 'Lock ID2'
column first_load_time  format a19     heading 'Requested'
break on lock_id1
select a.sid,
       username,
       terminal,
       decode(a.type,'MR', 'Media Recovery',
                  'RT', 'Redo Thread',
               'UN', 'User Name',
               'TX', 'Transaction',
               'TM', 'DML',
               'UL', 'PL/SQL User Lock',
               'DX', 'Distributed Xaction',
                 'CF', 'Control File',
               'IS', 'Instance State',
               'FS', 'File Set',
               'IR', 'Instance Recovery',
               'ST', 'Disk Space Transaction',
               'IR', 'Instance Recovery',
               'ST', 'Disk Space Transaction',
               'TS', 'Temp Segment',
               'IV', 'Library Cache Invalidation',
               'LS', 'Log Start or Switch',
               'RW', 'Row Wait',
               'SQ', 'Sequence Number',
               'TE', 'Extend Table',
               'TT', 'Temp Table', a.type) lock_type,
        decode(a.lmode,0, 'None',           /* Mon Lock equivalent */
   1, 'Null',           /* N */
   2, 'Row-S (SS)',     /* L */
   3, 'Row-X (SX)',     /* R */
   4, 'Share',          /* S */
   5, 'S/Row-X (SSX)',  /* C */
   6, 'Exclusive',      /* X */
   to_char(a.lmode)) mode_held,
   decode(a.request,
   0, 'None',           /* Mon Lock equivalent */
   1, 'Null',           /* N */
   2, 'Row-S (SS)',     /* L */
   3, 'Row-X (SX)',     /* R */
   4, 'Share',          /* S */
   5, 'S/Row-X (SSX)',  /* C */
   6, 'Exclusive',      /* X */
   to_char(a.request)) mode_requested,
   to_char(a.id1) lock_id1, to_char(a.id2) lock_id2,
   c.object object,
   d.sql_text sql,
   e.first_load_time
from v$lock a, v$session, v$access c, v$sqltext d, v$sqlarea e
   where (id1,id2) in
     (select b.id1, b.id2 from v$lock b where b.id1=a.id1 and
     b.id2=a.id2 and b.request>0) and
     a.sid = v$session.sid and
     a.sid = c.sid and
     d.address = v$session.sql_address and
     d.hash_value = v$session.sql_hash_value and
     d.address = e.address
order by a.id1, a.lmode descCheers,
Francisco Munoz Alvarez
http://www.oraclenz.com

Similar Messages

  • Transaction Locking during multiple Webservice - persistent webs sessions

    Hi All,<br>
    <br>
    Yesterday evening we had a discussion concerning ESA architecture. We want to create (web)services for accessing the SAP business objects (using XI) and use these (web)services via visual composer, webdynpro or custom java development.<br>
    <br>
    It does not seem a big problem to perform creations and reads of transaction, but when we want to change objects, we saw some problems concerning locking/commiting and rollbacks.<br>
    <br>
    From our GUI we would like to be able to go in edit mode and from that moment on, the transaction should be locked. We then want to change certain parameters and commit only when we push the save button.<br>
    <br>
    We can invoke a webservice wich tries to lock the transaction, but at the moment the XI scenario is completed (=the lock is created), the program at SAP side (=proxy in our case) is also finished and the lock is automaticly removed. How can we do locking, when using webservices via XI?<br>
    <br>
    The problem of the rollback and commit we can partially solve by putting more logic in the GUI, but we don't want to do that. How can we do a change of a business object and remember this change without doing a commit on the SAP system.... . Same problem for the rollback.<br>
    <br>
    Is there a away to keep a session "alive" during multiple webservice calls or to simulate it? Every webservice invokation happens in a different context...isn't it?<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <b>Just to make it a bit more clear.</b><br>
    <br>
    Suppose we create 6 service related to the business object bupa (business partner).<br>
    - read<br>
    - change<br>
    - commit<br>
    - rollback<br>
    - lock<br>
    - unlock.<br>
    <br>
    We create a GUI which uses these services.<br>
    <br>
    <b>Step1:</b> we want to see bupa in detail, so the read webservice is called and the retrieved details are shown in the GUI<br>
    <b>Step2:</b> we want to go in edit mode, so the lock webservice is called to lock the bupa. The bupa should stay locked, untill the unlock is called. Here occurs the problem. The webservice lock is called, XI will trigger the proxy on the SAP system. This proxy will lock the bupa. As soon as the proxy-program is completed, the bupa lock will automaticly be removed ... . We want to keep this lock!<br>
    <b>Step3:</b> we change the bupa using the change webservice. Only the user who locked the bupa should be able to change it.<br>
    Problem concerning the locking occurs: standard we don't know who locked the bupa (this is done by the generic RFC user, configured in sm59). Should we pass some kind of GUID towards the proxy and build some additional logic to know which end-user in fact locked it... . Using the userid isn't sufficient, because a user could logon multiple time simultanously.<br>
    <br>
    Another problem is that we want to change the bupa, without having to do a commit yet.De commit should be called only when pushing the save button. When the proxy is ended and we did not do a commit, the changes are lost normally ... .<br>
    <br>
    What we in fact want to do is Simulate the bsp behaviour.<br>
    <b>Step4:</b>We want to perform a save of the things we changed or a reset. This means the commit or rollback webservice is called.<br>
    <b>Step5:</b> We want to unlock the bupa by calling the unlock webservice.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    Please give me your comments.<br>
    <br>
    Kind regards<br>
    Joris<br>
    <br>
    Note: Transaction Locking during multiple Webservice "sessions".
    Message was edited by:
            Joris Verberckmoes

    There are multiple strategies how to resolve this. They require that the last change time is available in the changed object, and also that the client keeps the value of the change time when it read the data.
    1. First one wins
    Immediately before posting the changes, the current change time is read from the server. In case it is different from the client buffer, then the client changes are discarted.
    Example:
    1. Client A reads data
    2. Client B reads data
    3. Client B changes its buffer
    4. Client B checks if server change time has changed (result is no)
    5. Client B writes his changes to the server
    6. Client A changes its buffer
    7. Client A checks if server change time has changed (result is yes)
    8. Client A discarts its changes
    2. Last one wins
    Easy. Client just writes his changes to the server, overwriting any changes that might have occured since it read the data.
    Example:
    1. Client A reads data
    2. Client B reads data
    3. Client B changes its buffer
    4. Client B writes his changes to the server
    5. Client A changes its buffer
    6. Client A writes its changes to the server -> changes from client B are lost
    3. Everybody wins
    Most complicated. In case of concurrent changes, the client is responsible for merging his changes with the changes from other clients and to resolve any conflicts.
    Example:
    1. Client A reads data
    2. Client B reads data
    3. Client B changes its buffer
    4. Client B checks if server change time has changed (result is no)
    5. Client B writes his changes to the server
    6. Client A changes its buffer
    7. Client A checks if server change time has changed (result is yes)
    8. Client A merges its changes with changes from client B
    9. Client A writes his changes to the server
    "Last one wins" is definitely not water-proof. But even with the other strategies, data can potentially get lost in the short timeframe when the change time is checked and the actual update.
    To make it more secure, server support is required. E.g. the client could pass the change time from its read access to the server. The server can then reliably reject the update if the change data has been updated in beetween by another client.

  • CATS IDoc inbound problem - Transaction lock, LR002

    Customer is posting CATS records via interface from externa system to IDoc for CATS processing. Either the create BAPI (BAPI_...) is used or if there is a change to an already existing posting (BAPI_...). For his i have slightly modified the SAP standard existing FM for CATS inbound processing (IDOC_) to handle both scenarios, create and change. I basically examine CATS data from external system and if it is already existing then I call the change BAPI and if not found the I call the create BAPI.
    We have no problem posting with these BAPIs when there postings are imported one by one. But, when several CATS postings arrive at the same second then not all postings are handled correctly. We receive error message "Transaction locked by user XXX" (error message e002(lr)) and XXX is the background communication user. No luck using "Where used" for error 002 in message class LR either. Also tried tracing with trans SE30 but no luck there either.  Data is always different but can be for the same personell number. User is correct and not locked - it is the transaction (like CAT2) thats SAP standard reports as locked. Some postings go through alright but then after a few corrrect posting this problem pops up. Very frustating.
    Code is correct as it seems only to be a "overflow" problem. Config and data is also correct. Customer was also facing the very same error using the same BAPIs called via RFC and not via IDoc.
    Reason to change to IDoc was of course to set the posting as synchronous thus avoiding this "overflow" problem. In standard SAP is IDocs processed in parallell which is fine in many circumstances but not here. Or it might be OK as long as this error don't occur but have found no way so far. Customer is in production and this must be solved. We also tried this in a band new upgraded ECC 6.0 EhP5 system as customer is in the process of upgrading. Same error.
    I have found very few hints when searching through Google, SAPNet, SDN etc. This is one of the very few links I found: [Locking problem with FM EDI_DATA_INCOMING;
    So I checked this in trans WE46 but as customer is running ECC 6.0 EhP3 we have no such option. Then tried trans nOYEAn setting the parameter "Synchronous processing" but I do not understand how this is supposed to work. Problem stills remains. The values are stored in table EDICONFIG and here parameter INBSYNC is used for the synchrounous setting as of my understanding but we only have this for a user called EDIADMIN and that is certainly not our background user. I don't understand how to set this parameter correctly I guess. SAP help doen't give more insight either - at least not for me.
    Does anyone have a suggestion how to solve this problem? Anyone solved this before and willing to share a solution?
    << Moderator message - Please do not promise points >>
    I maybe beed to send this to SAP OSS but trying this option first.
    To me this is puzzling. Find very few references which normally means few have encountered this. Strange. CATS BAPI interfacing must be used by a lot of companies.
    BR, Johan
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Nov 7, 2011 2:36 PM

    Hi Johan,
    These kind of problems arise when there is a very little time gap between two successive postings. So put a 'WAIT UP TO 2 SECONDS' between each of the postings. This will give time for the previous posting to perform the updates even before the next posting hits the same transaction. This will solve your problem.

  • Transaction Lock

    hello
    is any body have any example scenario
    How to make transaction lock on a table ???

    It sounds like you are looking for a standby database (i.e. DataGuard). That would generally require that the standby operating system match the production operating system. Do you have another Solaris box that you could fail over to?
    Unless you want to fail over to a version of the database created during the export process and lose all the transactions made in the production database since then, you cannot use export and import to build a standby. You need to use your RMAN backup and apply the archived logs generated since the backup. But you're not going to be able to recover the RMAN backup on to a Linux box if the backup is from a Solaris server.
    Justin

  • Transaction Lock in Forms (TM,TX) How to get around?

    Hi,
    what is industry practice to avoid blocking locks bringing application processing to a standstill.
    I have few core table in material module e.g. material master, request, receipt, issues, whenever multiple user start using their respective forms such ac material_request, material_receipt, material_issue, Transaction Locks are acquired. and unless and until blocking user commits his transaction nobody else is able to work. how to get around this problem.
    There is lot of tech.material on net which tells me how to find blocking lock and objects, but nobody is giving answer how to avoid this situation.
    what is industry practice to avoid blocking locks bringing application processing to a standstill.
    regards

    Risky Solution !!
    I am facing more problem in to material requisition form, because many user want to request material. they open this form start entry and when they stuck for information they just keep that form open, in background the tables are locked because of change in data-block. now what do i do.
    regards

  • How to release  transaction lock on a table

    Dear
    can you please let me konw how to release a transaction lock on a table.
    thanks
    VIJAY

    I thought of a more traditional method
    http://www.stephstuff.com/esafe/images/ouch2.gif
    Laurent, You've read my mind :) or vice-versa

  • Container Managed Transaction locking Database- RollBack

    Hi,
    I am trying to call a Stateless Session Bean (B) in domain D2 from another stateless session bean (A) in domain 1 within a transaction.
    The <trans-attribute> in both ejb-jar.xmls is "Required".
    Bean B accesses the Database and the method is successful in inserting the record ( not comitted ) , but the database is getting locked due to which the transaction is rolling back.
    Any pointers in this regard is greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Harsha

    Hi,
    I guess that there is a problem with your JMS provider and that the message would not be enqueued if the connection is not closed before the exception is raised. If it is the case then I would recommend you to report this problem to your JMS provider.
    Arnaud

  • Transaction Locking

    hi,
    Quick question. I have a session bean which I am using to access my database. I execute the SQL using prepared statements. In one case for an insert I perform the following:
    1. Insert a records
    2. Read a sequence to get the id of the previous insert
    3. Insert another record in another table with the id of the first as an attribute.
    My question is concerning transactions. During this sequence of events do I have a lock on all this data during all three queries. Or can another user increment the sequence during the execution of these SQL queries? Do I have to set a lock manually?
    Thanks
    Steve

    Hi Steve,
    You can group these operations inside a single transaction to make it ACID. You also need to configure the transaction isolation level of the underlying datasource (or connection) used by your transaction. In any event, your application should not attempt to manage these transaction details.
    -cheng

  • Transaction Locked

    Hi all,
    I want to release one PO, system allow me to release the PO but when i release the PO and tried to save it , transaction gets locked and system is not able to save it.
    What could be the reason that system is not allowing me to save the release.
    When i go to SM12 t code also i can see
    15:23:32 E EKKO 4544xxxxxxx4
    15:23:32 E EKPO 4544xxxxxxx4#####
    What could be the reason system is not allowing me save the release and also locking the transaction.
    Regards,
    SAPUSER

    Hi ,
    Well I guess,
    there must be some workflows whixh must have been fired as soona s the PO is released which is locking the PO or there can be some user-exit also which has locked the PO .
    Please check
    Thnks,
    Sahil

  • Transaction Locking Problem in JDBC with ResultSet : ORA-17090.

    I have a locking concern using JDBC. I select a set of records to determine if they
    need to to be updated by a set of generated results (from else where in the program).
    If the results are not in this cursored set of records selected they are to be INSERTED
    else they (if they are in the select set) they are to be UPDATED.
    I set up a ResultSet using concurrancy parameters so that I can scroll through them for
    each of the program results to check. If I set up the ResultSet with TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE,
    CONCUR_UPDATABLE, I get a possible race condition if I am accessing teh same records
    through some other program such as toad. As such the first record is not checked (if my
    cursor in toad is on this first record) and as such is duplicated.
    If I set up the ResultSet with TYPE_SCROLL_SENSITIVE, CONCUR_READ_ONLY. This fixes this
    concurrancy problem but occassionally I get the following error which is Oracle based and
    not documented:
    java.sql.SQLException: operation not allowed: Unsupported syntax for refreshRow()
    at oracle.jdbc.dbaccess.DBError.throwSqlException(DBError.java:251) at
    oracle.jdbc.driver.SensitiveScrollableResultSet.refreshRow(SensitiveScrollableResultSet.java:171)
    at oracle.jdbc.driver.SensitiveScrollableResultSet.handle_refetch(SensitiveScrollableResultSet.java:239)
    at oracle.jdbc.driver.SensitiveScrollableResultSet.next(SensitiveScrollableResultSet.java:83)
    at sfwmd.hisa.oneflow.TimeSeries.load(TimeSeries.java:2502)
    at sfwmd.hisa.oneflow.OneParameter.main(OneParameter.java:808)
    which translates to an ORA-17090 (operation not allowed)
    {NOTE: I do NOT call ResultSet.refreshRow() anywhere in my program}
    I do not see any methods in ResultSet for record locking, outside of the mentioned parameters
    in the constructor. The database (updates and inserts) changes are all batched and executed
    AFTER this ResultSet is released.
    -James Fox
    [email protected]

    post ur code..

  • Regd : Transaction CK11N

    Hi -
    While running a cost estimate of a product through transaction code CK11N, the system displays a table containing the columns for Components, Value, Quantity etc.  'Where from the data related to Quantity & Value arrived in  the table (i.e. cost estimate) displayed on the screen.
    What is the importance of this transaction ?

    Dear Anubama,
    CK11N is used to calculate the cost estimate with quantity structure.
    Here the quantity struture means a BOMRouting combination in Discrete scenario BOMRate routing
    in a REM scenario and a master recipe in Process Manufacturing.
    For this you have to include the check box with quantity structure in costing 1 view of the mterial master.
    While executing CK11N,you use a costing variant and this costing variant will be having the selection ID
    assigned for BOM as well as routing.
    Check in T Code OKKN for understanding the settings related to this costing variant.
    Once after saving this cost estimate you have to use CK24 to mark and release the cost estimate.
    Instead of this you can use CK40N to do cost estimate as well mark and release.
    Check and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Regd : Transaction MD61

    Hi -
    Whenever i open the MD61 transaction, the created requirements appear in Edit mode. But my requirement is that when i open MD61 transaction everytime, a new screen should be created without displaying the previously created requirements and a new requirement plan number should be created by the system automatically
    Any suggestions for this

    Hi,
    By default it will go to edit mode only. For Ex Say Material number 10001. I want to create Planned independent reqmnt So I will use MD61 for this. Next time if i Want to create another PIR for another material. It will go to first screen. Where we need to change the material number. If once again We want to create the new PIR in MD61 for the same material. Logically it is correct.
    Please maintain required version ( Reqmnt Plan)  for the same.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kundan Kumar

  • Regd: transaction variant

    hi all
             i have used transaction variant for a particular transaction to make a field mandatory. after that i have created a transaction code for that transaction variant also. but i am unable to see any changes to the field ie the field is not made mandatory either in standard transaction nor in custom transaction.kindly find out my error so that i can make that field mandatory thru transaction variant.
    regards
    srikanth.

    Did you create the transacation with type "Transaction with variant"...
    If not create with that type...
    Goto se93
    give your trxname, click create
    on the intial dialog...choose Transaction with variant (radio button)...
    and proceed..

  • How to lock transaction codes in ABAP report

    Hello all,
    I'm now planning to lock several transaction codes as a batch job to prevent end users from using locked tr-cds while processing batch jobs during online service period.
    I found out tr-cd: SM01 to lock tr-cds, but I don't get what I can do with this tr-cd when you want to execute this as a background job.
    I suppose I can make it by using transaction recorder or call transaction.
    But I want to do this in smarter manner (like executing certain report PGM with a variant containing tr-cds to be locked).
    I rather prefer using FM or BAPI to using transaction recorder etc if possible...
    If you know anything on this issue, please please help me..
    Hozy

    Hi,
    Not quite correct - this is the FM that posts a record about the lock/unlock to the audit log (SM01 calls it), but ir doesn't change the transaction lock itself.
    Here is a sample report that does do the trick. You may want to change it to your needs, e.g. allow changing multiple transactions in one run:
    REPORT  ZTXLOCK.
    parameters:
      p_tcode      type tcode obligatory,
      p_mode       type char1 obligatory.   "L=lock, U=unlock
    tables: tstc.
    at selection-screen on p_tcode.
      select single * from tstc where tcode = p_tcode.
      if sy-subrc <> 0.
        message e002(sy) with 'Transaction code not found'.
      endif.
    at selection-screen on p_mode.
      if p_mode na 'LU'.
        message e002(sy) with 'Invalid mode, use L (lock), U (unlock)'.
      endif.
    start-of-selection.
      case p_mode.
        when 'L'.
          perform bit-set(sapmtstc) using tstc-cinfo 6.
        when 'U'.
          perform bit-reset(sapmtstc) using tstc-cinfo 6.
      endcase.
      update tstc.
      if sy-dbcnt = 0.
        message e002(sy) with 'TSTC update failed'.
      endif.
    Regards,
    Mark

  • Disk space transaction  and temp table lock  in oracle

    Hi,
    Today many sessions used to get disk space transaction lock and temp table lock and i am seeing these locks first time in my Production database,
    is there any workaround to avoid this contension.
    Thanks
    Prakash GR

    Post your version (all 3 decimal places).
    Post the SELECT statement and results that have led you to this conclusion.
    Other than the fact that you have seen a number what, precisely, is the issue.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Windows 8 and Flash Player

    I have recently purchased a new laptop that operates Windows 8.  I am a member of an online education site that has streaming video classes.  The site will not let me get past a notice that I need to d'load Adobe Flash Player.  When I check it, Adobe

  • IWork 08 and iWeb 08 crashes!?

    After work for 1 day with the apps. iWork 08 and iWeb 08 crashes. After the application starts and a template is selected or a file is loading ... there is a crash. iWeb 08 chrashes until start up. Have done repair permissions, deinstalled all, deins

  • AS3: addChild from an AS file

    Hello, I have a fla file with a MovieClip named Billy (class: Billy, Base Class: flash.display.MovieClip) linked to Billy.as. I am trying to get .as file to add an instance of the MovieClip Billy onto the stage with no luck. If anybody can help me he

  • Covert the business partner cardtype from lead to customer

    hi i have created on BP as Lead type ,i have created one sales oppertunity for lead BP ,then when i create sales order for that BPartner he should covert automaticaly cardtype from lead to customer.  can we change the card type?,is it possible? regar

  • Change picture frame on summary blog page

    I added a blog to my page. On the entries page I changed pictures and selected for these pictures no frame at the information selection. Now at the summary of the blog I can see these pictures, but only with a frame. How can I change this frame on th