Regular expressions (gnu.regexp) (porting)

i am porting a c++ application to java
the cpp application was using the c version of gnu.regexp as a dll
in java i am using the gnu.regexp package
i tried to compile the regular expressions with the same flags as in the c++ program they are
RE_CHAR_CLASSES
RE_CONTEXT_INDEP_ANCHORS
RE_CONTEXT_INDEP_OPS
RE_DOT_NEWLINE
RE_DOT_NOT_NULL
RE_INTERVALS
RE_NO_BK_BRACES
RE_NO_BK_PARENS
RE_NO_BK_VBAR
RE_NO_EMPTY_RANGES
RE_UNMATCHED_RIGHT_PAREN_ORD
i have two regular expression as shown below
1. (\\<(ab )?abc[:]? [(]?abcdegth abcdef ([:]|([(][A-Z0-9 /-]{10,50} [)])) aabbccd )
2. (\\<SIL)|(\\(REF[:] AIB[-]SIL)
if i compile them using the same flags i get a EXPETED END OF SUB EXPRESSION ERROR
but it works fine in cpp
the regular expression 2 works only if RE_NO_BK_PARENS is set and the reqular expression one compiles successfully only if RE_NO_BK_PARENS is not set can any body give me a alternate solution ( i.e a possible solution where i can compile both )
p.s : i tried to find gnu.regexp fourums but i could not find please help me
thanks a lot in advance

why not using the java.util.regex package of 1.4?but for my application using gnu.regexp is much suited

Similar Messages

Is there a way to be sure that created Regular expression (Class RegExp) is valid?

Is it possible to create wrong Regular expression in ActionScript/Flex which will cause runtime error? Or how to validate RegExp?
I've tried so many weird regexpes in Flash and Flex, it never complained! How do I know If my regexp valid?

"It is VERY reliable. If match() returns null - this means that String doesn't have any parts that match pattern."
Exactly, but is doenst mean that syntax of RegExp is correct since you dont know what gave you null
Apparemtly /foo([/ is wrong expression, and Java compiller complains:
Unclosed character class near index 4 foo([ ^
but in AS3 i can create
var xxd:RegExp = /foo([/;
when I do xxd.exec("") it got null;
and no complains!! How to understand that?
But in same time
var xxd:RegExp = /foo/;
xxd.exec(""), will be null as well!?

Regular expression again

Hi there
i'm using this regular expression:
String regexp = "(\\s+)\\di(\\s+)";
Pattern p = Pattern.compile(regexp,CASE_INSENSITIVE);
Matcher m = p.matcher(inputString);
clean = m.replaceAll(" ");
by which i'd like, given the following inputString:
"a da diapason di da_R_randomChars_DI_DA"
i want to obtain the following:
"diapason da__R_randomChars_DI_DA"
that's to say, to search for all occurrences of di,a,da char sequences that are followed by one or more white space or that follow one or more white space...
but it doesn't work...why?
where am I wrong?
thanks

1) Your capture groups are wrong
2) [] matches any of so da maches
da, a, d, di, i
     String inputString = "a da diapason di da_R_randomChars_DI_DA";
     String regexp = "\\s+(di|a|da)\\s+";
     Pattern p = Pattern.compile(regexp,Pattern.CASE_INSENSITIVE);
     Matcher m = p.matcher(inputString);
     String clean = m.replaceAll("");
     System.out.println( inputString );
     System.out.println( clean );
     System.out.println( "diapason da_R_randomChars_DI_DA" );give you:
$ java Test
a da diapason di da_R_randomChars_DI_DA
a diapason da_R_randomChars_DI_DA
diapason da_R_randomChars_DI_DA
Which is almost there, but your regex matches at lest one space, not one space, or start of line.

Problem in creating a Regular Expression with gnu

Hi All,
iam trying to create a regular expression using gnu package api..
gnu.regex.RE;
i need to validate the browser's(MSIE) userAgent through my regular expression
userAgent is like :First one ==> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)
i wrote an regular expression like this:
Mozilla.*(.*)\\s*(.*)compatible;\\s*MSIE(.*)\\s*(.*)([0-9]\\.[0-9])(.*);\\s*(.*)Windows(.*)\\s*NT(.*)\\s*5.0(.*)
Actaully this is validating my userAgent and returns true, my problem is, it is returning true if userAgent is having more words at the end after Windows NT 5.0 like Second One ==> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0) Testing
i want the regularExpression pattern to validate the First one and return true for it, and has to return false for the Second one..
my code is:
import gnu.regexp.*;
import gnu.regexp.REException;
public class TestRegexp
public static boolean getUserAgentDetails(String userAgent)
     boolean isvalid = false;
     RE regexp = new RE("Mozilla.*(.*)\\s*(.*)compatible;\\s*MSIE(.*)\\s*(.*)([0-9]\\.[0-9])(.*);\\s*(.*)Windows(.*)\\s*NT(.*)\\s*5.0(.*)");
     isvalid = regexp.isMatch(userAgent);
     return isvalid;
public static void main(String a[])
     String userAgent = "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)";
     boolean regoutput = getUserAgentDetails(userAgent);
     System.out.println("***** regoutput is ****** " + regoutput);
}please help me in solving this..
Thanks in Advance..
thanx,
krishna

Ofcourse, i can do comparision with simple string matching..
but problem is the userAgent that i want to support is for all the MSIE versions ranging from 5.0 onwards, so there will the version difference of IE like MSIE 6.0..! or MSIE 5.5 some thing like that..
any ways i will try with StringTokenizer once..!
seems that will do my work..
Thanks,
krishna

Regular expression validates in DB but not with a apex regexp validation?

Hi all,
sorry if I overlooked a similar post:
I have a page with a form and item containing this email address [email protected] that item I've made a validation of type regular expression.
I've got my item in
Validation expression 1 P420_EMAIL and in
Validation expression 2 '^[a-zA-Z0-9\_\.\-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9\_\.\-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,4}$'If I do
select '[email protected]'
from dual
where regexp_like('[email protected]' , '^[a-zA-Z0-9\_\.\-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9\_\.\-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,4}$') on the DB this returns my email address as expected.
If I submit my form with that same email address I get my error message from my validation.
What's the difference I'm missing between the Apex way and the DB way of validating with this regular expression?
Thanks a lot!
Kind regards,
Diana

why not rewrite the validation to the type PL/SQL expression (function returning boolean) and put this in the expression1:
regexp_like(:P420_EMAIL , '^[a-zA-Z0-9\_\.\-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9\_\.\-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,4}$')
then you're absolutely sure you are doing the right validation. If that doesn't work, try displaying the result of the validation on screen to see what goes wrong.

Help on regular expression

hi all
i need to validate telephone number , and i tried to use the following expression :
"[\\d][\\d][\\d]-[\\d][\\d][\\d][\\d]" or
"[0-9][0-9][0-9]-[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]" they did not seem to work. can anyone provide some help on this? thanks in advance.

Hi,
Can anyone provide me the regular expression for the following?
1. String Should contain 7 letters (can include '*') followed by 5 alphanumeric characters i.e.5 numbers/letters
For this one, I've written reg expn = ([a-zA-Z]*[*]*[a-zA-Z]*){7}\\w{5}
But, somehow this is not working...can anyone pleaseeeee explain wots wrong with this one or give me alternate solution???????
2. String should contain 7 numbers or 7 digits consisting of 1 letter & 6 numbers in varying order, no spaces.
For this one, reg expn = (\\d{7})|((\\d*[a-zA-Z]\\d*){7})
But this is also not working...... Please help!!!!!
3. String should contain 9 numbers or 8 alphanumeric characters i.e. 8 numbers/letters or 13 numbers
This one looks really simple, but still (\\d{9})|(\\w{8})|(\\d{13}) is not working.....Please helpppp
I'll appreciate if any Regular Expresion expert can resolve my problem!!! Also, I'm using gnu-regexp-1.0.8.jar as we r not using JDK 1.4!!!! We've to use only this library, no other choice...so, please suggest!!!!!!

Regular expressions URGENT !!!

i am using the gnu.regexp package for regular expression matching can any body tell me how do i get the (regular expression)subexpression index that the string matched to without iterating
detailed problem desc:
package :gnu.regexp
regular expression : lots of regulat expression combined with "|"
method : getall matches
requirment: need to get the (regular expression's)sub expression index that the current string matched from REmatch or some other class without iteration or another call to getall matches
note: if there is no solution can it be done using java.util.regexp or jregex ( if so i need the equivalent of getall matches)
thanks in advace to all java gurus

Why you don't use groups?
In java.util.regex you can access the content of a group with "String group(int index)". Or did I missunderstand the meening of your "subexpression index" ?
Regards,
Finn

The regular expression.

Hello all, I have need to learn the regular expression for teh Oracle database. Can
anyones tell to me where I find the informations - good sites that give the secrets ;)
I have already look but would like some advices. Nóra

Nóra wrote:
Hello all, I have need to learn the regular expression for teh Oracle database. Can
anyones tell to me where I find the informations - good sites that give the secrets ;)
I have already look but would like some advices. NóraHi Nóra,
I have been looking at this recently myself and I have a few
sites bookmarked. Enjoy the intricacies of regexen - with any
luck, you won't even have to learn any PL/SQL ;)
Good introdution
http://www.zytrax.com/tech/web/regex.htm
Simple summary of Oracle's regular expressions
http://www.regular-expressions.info/oracle.html
Not forgetting the Wiki (contains table with vi
equivalents - for those of us who use a real editor ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression
This site should be one of your main ports of call for any Oracle issues.
Good forums also - better software than Oracle themselves.
http://www.orafaq.com/node/2404
Morgan's Library - used to be psoug.org - don't know what happened - anyone?
Daniel posts here from time to time
http://www.morganslibrary.org/reference/regexp.html
And,not forgetting the Oracle docco.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14251/adfns_regexp.htm
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B12037_01/appdev.101/b10795/adfns_re.htm
Also look on OTN for a .pdf for introduction.HTH,
Paul...

What, no regular expressions?

I was porting a CGI to use Oracle as a backend instead of
PostgreSQL. When I couldn't find any regular expression
facilities in Oracle, I reconsidered and ended up waiting for the
next release of PostreSQL.
Still, Oracle was startlingly fast and can do things PostgreSQL
can't (a VIEW based on a UNION ALL, and a column based on a
subselect).
Maybe Sybase has regexps, but I won't find out till I have some
more spare time.
null

JoeD. wrote:
> Greetings all. I'm having a heckofa problem and I was
hoping someone on these
> boards may be able to help. I have 1000s links that I
need to process and I
> dread doing this by hand.
Why don't you simplify your request?
This is what I have: <a
href="xxx.php?blah">text</a>
This is what I want: <a href="xxx.html">text</a>
It's my guess that this would be very easy, but give us
examples of
before and after.
Mick
Many of the links are now bad links?and they are
> 'bad' in a very predictable way as they call contain
'php?title=' ? so I want
> to search for the bad link code and simply strip the
<anchor> tag and leave the
> containing text as is. My guess is that this shouldn't
be as difficult as it
> is, but I could be very wrong here. So, I've done the
following in the
> Find/Replace dialog: Search: Specific Tag Selected Tag:
A With Attribute:
> HREF Here is where I get confused. The 'with attribute'
option has '=, <, >,
> !=' as the optoins. So I tried the equality operator
using both regular
> expressoins (*php\?title\=*) and without regular
expressions(php?title), but no
> matter what I do, none of the links are being found. I'm
very new to regex so
> maybe maybe my code here is bad. I wish there was a
'containing' option that
> with attribute exposed, but there isn't. So: do any of
y'all DW gurus have
> any ideas about this? I'm pulling what little hair I
have left out over this.
> Thanks, Joe
>

Re: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes - Pease don't forget about the regular expression potential

Namburi,
When you said you used the Reg Exp tool, did you use it only as
preconfigured by the iMT migrate application wizard?
Because the default configuration of the regular expression tool will only
target the files in your ND project directories. If you wish to target
classes outside of the normal directory scope, you have to either modify the
"Source Directory" property OR create another instance of the regular
expression tool. See the "Tool" menu in the iMT to create additional tool
instances which can each be configured to target different sets of files
using different sets of rules.
Usually, I utilize 3 different sets of rules files on a given migration:
spider2jato.xml
these are the generic conversion rules (but includes the optimized rules for
ViewBean and Model based code, i.e. these rules do not utilize the
RequestManager since it is not needed for code running inside the ViewBean
or Model classes)
I run these rules against all files.
See the file download section of this forum for periodic updates to these
rules.
nonProjectFileRules.xml
these include rules that add the necessary
RequestManager.getRequestContext(). etc prefixes to many of the common
calls.
I run these rules against user module and any other classes that do not are
not ModuleServlet, ContainerView, or Model classes.
appXRules.xml
these rules include application specific changes that I discover while
working on the project. A common thing here is changing import statements
(since the migration tool moves ND project code into different jato
packaging structure, you sometime need to adjust imports in non-project
classes that previously imported ND project specific packages)
So you see, you are not limited to one set of rules at all. Just be careful
to keep track of your backups (the regexp tool provides several options in
its Expert Properties related to back up strategies).
----- Original Message -----
From: <vnamboori@y...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 6:08 AM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes - Pease don't
forget about the regular expression potential
Thanks Matt, Mike, Todd
This is a great input for our migration. Though we used the existing
Regular Expression Mapping tool, we did not change this to meet our
own needs as mentioned by Mike.
We would certainly incorporate this to ease our migration.
Namburi
--- In iPlanet-JATO@y..., "Todd Fast" <toddwork@c...> wrote:
All--
Great response. By the way, the Regular Expression Tool uses thePerl5 RE
syntax as implemented by Apache OROMatcher. If you're doing lotsof these
sorts of migration changes manually, you should definitely buy theO'Reilly
book "Mastering Regular Expressions" and generate some rules toautomate the
conversion. Although they are definitely confusing at first,regular
expressions are fairly easy to understand with some documentation,and are
superbly effective at tackling this kind of migration task.
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Frisino" <Michael.Frisino@S...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes -Pease don't
forget about the regular expression potential
Also, (and Matt's document may mention this)
Please bear in mind that this statement is not totally correct:
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion for
these
utilities we have to do manually.Remember, the iMT is a SUITE of tools. There is the extractiontool, and
the translation tool, and the regular expression tool, and severalother
smaller tools (like the jar and compilation tools). It is correctto state
that the extraction and translation tools only significantlyconvert the
primary ND project objects (the pages, the data objects, and theproject
classes). The extraction and translation tools do minimumtranslation of the
User Module objects (i.e. they repackage the user module classes inthe new
jato module packages). It is correct that for all other utilityclasses
which are not formally part of the ND project, the extraction and
translation tools do not perform any migration.
However, the regular expression tool can "migrate" any arbitrary
file
(utility classes etc) to the degree that the regular expressionrules
correlate to the code present in the arbitrary file. So first andforemost,
if you have alot of spider code in your non-project classes youshould
consider using the regular expression tool and if warranted adding
additional rules to reduce the amount of manual adjustments thatneed to be
made. I can stress this enough. We can even help you write theregular
expression rules if you simply identify the code pattern you wish to
convert. Just because there is not already a regular expressionrule to
match your need does not mean it can't be written. We have notnearly
exhausted the possibilities.
For example if you say, we need to convert
CSpider.getDataObject("X");
To
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(XModel.class);
Maybe we or somebody else in the list can help write that regularexpression if it has not already been written. For instance in thelast
updated spider2jato.xml file there is already aCSpider.getCommonPage("X")
rule:

<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getPage[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getPage[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[getViewBean($1ViewBean.class]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
Following this example a getDataObject to getModel would look
like this:
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getDataObject[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getDataObject[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[getModel($1Model.class]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
In fact, one migration developer already wrote that rule andsubmitted it
for inclusion in the basic set. I will post another upgrade to thebasic
regular expression rule set, look for a "file uploaded" posting.Also,
please consider contributing any additional generic rules that youhave
written for inclusion in the basic set.
Please not, that in some cases (Utility classes in particular)
the rule
application may be more effective as TWO sequention rules ratherthan one
monolithic rule. Again using the example above, it will convert
CSpider.getDataObject("Foo");
To
getModel(FooModel.class);
Now that is the most effective conversion for that code if that
code is in
a page or data object class file. But if that code is in a Utilityclass you
really want:
>
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(FooModel.class
So to go from
getModel(FooModel.class);
To
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(FooModel.class
You would apply a second rule AND you would ONLY run this rule
against
your utility classes so that you would not otherwise affect yourViewBean
and Model classes which are completely fine with the simplegetModel call.
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[getModel$]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[getModel\(]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
A similer rule can be applied to getSession and other CSpider APIcalls.
For instance here is the rule for converting getSession calls toleverage
the RequestManager.
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[getSession\($\.]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[getSession\.]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[RequestManager.getSession().]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Stevens" <matthew.stevens@e...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:56 PM
Subject: RE: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Namburi,
I will post a document to the group site this evening which has
the
details
on various tactics of migrating these type of utilities.
Essentially,
you
either need to convert these utilities to Models themselves or
keep the
utilities as is and simply use the
RequestManager.getRequestContext.getModelManager().getModel()
to statically access Models.
For CSpSelect.executeImmediate() I have an example of customhelper
method
as a replacement whicch uses JDBC results instead of
CSpDBResult.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: vnamboori@y... [mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=081071113213093190112061186248100208071048">vnamboori@y...</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Hi All,
In the present ND project we have lots of utility classes.
These
classes in diffrent directory. Not part of nd pages.
In these classes we access the dataobjects and do themanipulations.
So we access dataobjects directly like
CSpider.getDataObject("do....");
and then execute it.
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion forthese
utilities we have to do manually.
My question is Can we access the the models in the postmigration
sameway or do we need requestContext?
We have lots of utility classes which are DataObjectintensive. Can
someone suggest a better way to migrate this kind of code.
Thanks
Namburi
[email protected]
[email protected]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected]
[email protected]

Namburi,
When you said you used the Reg Exp tool, did you use it only as
preconfigured by the iMT migrate application wizard?
Because the default configuration of the regular expression tool will only
target the files in your ND project directories. If you wish to target
classes outside of the normal directory scope, you have to either modify the
"Source Directory" property OR create another instance of the regular
expression tool. See the "Tool" menu in the iMT to create additional tool
instances which can each be configured to target different sets of files
using different sets of rules.
Usually, I utilize 3 different sets of rules files on a given migration:
spider2jato.xml
these are the generic conversion rules (but includes the optimized rules for
ViewBean and Model based code, i.e. these rules do not utilize the
RequestManager since it is not needed for code running inside the ViewBean
or Model classes)
I run these rules against all files.
See the file download section of this forum for periodic updates to these
rules.
nonProjectFileRules.xml
these include rules that add the necessary
RequestManager.getRequestContext(). etc prefixes to many of the common
calls.
I run these rules against user module and any other classes that do not are
not ModuleServlet, ContainerView, or Model classes.
appXRules.xml
these rules include application specific changes that I discover while
working on the project. A common thing here is changing import statements
(since the migration tool moves ND project code into different jato
packaging structure, you sometime need to adjust imports in non-project
classes that previously imported ND project specific packages)
So you see, you are not limited to one set of rules at all. Just be careful
to keep track of your backups (the regexp tool provides several options in
its Expert Properties related to back up strategies).
----- Original Message -----
From: <vnamboori@y...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 6:08 AM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes - Pease don't
forget about the regular expression potential
Thanks Matt, Mike, Todd
This is a great input for our migration. Though we used the existing
Regular Expression Mapping tool, we did not change this to meet our
own needs as mentioned by Mike.
We would certainly incorporate this to ease our migration.
Namburi
--- In iPlanet-JATO@y..., "Todd Fast" <toddwork@c...> wrote:
All--
Great response. By the way, the Regular Expression Tool uses thePerl5 RE
syntax as implemented by Apache OROMatcher. If you're doing lotsof these
sorts of migration changes manually, you should definitely buy theO'Reilly
book "Mastering Regular Expressions" and generate some rules toautomate the
conversion. Although they are definitely confusing at first,regular
expressions are fairly easy to understand with some documentation,and are
superbly effective at tackling this kind of migration task.
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Frisino" <Michael.Frisino@S...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes -Pease don't
forget about the regular expression potential
Also, (and Matt's document may mention this)
Please bear in mind that this statement is not totally correct:
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion for
these
utilities we have to do manually.Remember, the iMT is a SUITE of tools. There is the extractiontool, and
the translation tool, and the regular expression tool, and severalother
smaller tools (like the jar and compilation tools). It is correctto state
that the extraction and translation tools only significantlyconvert the
primary ND project objects (the pages, the data objects, and theproject
classes). The extraction and translation tools do minimumtranslation of the
User Module objects (i.e. they repackage the user module classes inthe new
jato module packages). It is correct that for all other utilityclasses
which are not formally part of the ND project, the extraction and
translation tools do not perform any migration.
However, the regular expression tool can "migrate" any arbitrary
file
(utility classes etc) to the degree that the regular expressionrules
correlate to the code present in the arbitrary file. So first andforemost,
if you have alot of spider code in your non-project classes youshould
consider using the regular expression tool and if warranted adding
additional rules to reduce the amount of manual adjustments thatneed to be
made. I can stress this enough. We can even help you write theregular
expression rules if you simply identify the code pattern you wish to
convert. Just because there is not already a regular expressionrule to
match your need does not mean it can't be written. We have notnearly
exhausted the possibilities.
For example if you say, we need to convert
CSpider.getDataObject("X");
To
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(XModel.class);
Maybe we or somebody else in the list can help write that regularexpression if it has not already been written. For instance in thelast
updated spider2jato.xml file there is already aCSpider.getCommonPage("X")
rule:

<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getPage[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getPage[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[getViewBean($1ViewBean.class]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
Following this example a getDataObject to getModel would look
like this:
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getDataObject[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getDataObject[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[getModel($1Model.class]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
In fact, one migration developer already wrote that rule andsubmitted it
for inclusion in the basic set. I will post another upgrade to thebasic
regular expression rule set, look for a "file uploaded" posting.Also,
please consider contributing any additional generic rules that youhave
written for inclusion in the basic set.
Please not, that in some cases (Utility classes in particular)
the rule
application may be more effective as TWO sequention rules ratherthan one
monolithic rule. Again using the example above, it will convert
CSpider.getDataObject("Foo");
To
getModel(FooModel.class);
Now that is the most effective conversion for that code if that
code is in
a page or data object class file. But if that code is in a Utilityclass you
really want:
>
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(FooModel.class
So to go from
getModel(FooModel.class);
To
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(FooModel.class
You would apply a second rule AND you would ONLY run this rule
against
your utility classes so that you would not otherwise affect yourViewBean
and Model classes which are completely fine with the simplegetModel call.
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[getModel$]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[getModel\(]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
A similer rule can be applied to getSession and other CSpider APIcalls.
For instance here is the rule for converting getSession calls toleverage
the RequestManager.
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[getSession\($\.]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[getSession\.]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[RequestManager.getSession().]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Stevens" <matthew.stevens@e...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:56 PM
Subject: RE: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Namburi,
I will post a document to the group site this evening which has
the
details
on various tactics of migrating these type of utilities.
Essentially,
you
either need to convert these utilities to Models themselves or
keep the
utilities as is and simply use the
RequestManager.getRequestContext.getModelManager().getModel()
to statically access Models.
For CSpSelect.executeImmediate() I have an example of customhelper
method
as a replacement whicch uses JDBC results instead of
CSpDBResult.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: vnamboori@y... [mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=081071113213093190112061186248100208071048">vnamboori@y...</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Hi All,
In the present ND project we have lots of utility classes.
These
classes in diffrent directory. Not part of nd pages.
In these classes we access the dataobjects and do themanipulations.
So we access dataobjects directly like
CSpider.getDataObject("do....");
and then execute it.
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion forthese
utilities we have to do manually.
My question is Can we access the the models in the postmigration
sameway or do we need requestContext?
We have lots of utility classes which are DataObjectintensive. Can
someone suggest a better way to migrate this kind of code.
Thanks
Namburi
[email protected]
[email protected]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected]
[email protected]

[SOLVED]ZSH and regular expressions

Hi
I am getting into regular expressions and i have noticed that with my .zshrc file i have some problem. In bash this expression works:
\^\[^#]
but not also in zsh. I have also noted that regular expression works fine with other zshrc configurations found in archwiki (like grml) but i want to have my configuration. And i really can't find what command make a difference
My .zshrc file is pulled from this site https://github.com/slashbeast/things/bl … s/DOTzshrc.
# .zshrc
# Author: Piotr Karbowski <[email protected]>
# License: beerware.
# Basic zsh config.
umask 077
ZDOTDIR=${ZDOTDIR:-${HOME}}
ZSHDDIR="${HOME}/.config/zsh.d"
HISTFILE="${ZDOTDIR}/.zsh_history"
HISTSIZE='10000'
SAVEHIST="${HISTSIZE}"
export EDITOR="/usr/bin/vim"
export TMP="$HOME/tmp"
export TEMP="$TMP"
export TMPDIR="$TMP"
export TMPPREFIX="${TMPDIR}/zsh"
if [ ! -d "${TMP}" ]; then mkdir "${TMP}"; fi
if ! [[ "${PATH}" =~ "^${HOME}/bin" ]]; then
export PATH="${HOME}/bin:${PATH}"
fi
# Not all servers have terminfo for rxvt-256color. :<
if [ "${TERM}" = 'rxvt-256color' ] && ! [ -f '/usr/share/terminfo/r/rxvt-256color' ] && ! [ -f '/lib/terminfo/r/rxvt-256color' ] && ! [ -f "${HOME}/.terminfo/r/rxvt-256color" ]; then
export TERM='rxvt-unicode'
fi
# Colors.
red='\e[0;31m'
RED='\e[1;31m'
green='\e[0;32m'
GREEN='\e[1;32m'
yellow='\e[0;33m'
YELLOW='\e[1;33m'
blue='\e[0;34m'
BLUE='\e[1;34m'
purple='\e[0;35m'
PURPLE='\e[1;35m'
cyan='\e[0;36m'
CYAN='\e[1;36m'
NC='\e[0m'
# Functions
if [ -f '/etc/profile.d/prll.sh' ]; then
. "/etc/profile.d/prll.sh"
fi
run_under_tmux() {
# Run $1 under session or attach if such session already exist.
# $2 is optional path, if no specified, will use $1 from $PATH.
# If you need to pass extra variables, use $2 for it as in example below..
# Example usage:
# torrent() { run_under_tmux 'rtorrent' '/usr/local/rtorrent-git/bin/rtorrent'; }
# mutt() { run_under_tmux 'mutt'; }
# irc() { run_under_tmux 'irssi' "TERM='screen' command irssi"; }
# There is a bug in linux's libevent...
# export EVENT_NOEPOLL=1
command -v tmux >/dev/null 2>&1 || return 1
if [ -z "$1" ]; then return 1; fi
local name="$1"
if [ -n "$2" ]; then
local file_path="$2"
else
local file_path="command ${name}"
fi
if tmux has-session -t "${name}" 2>/dev/null; then
tmux attach -d -t "${name}"
else
tmux new-session -s "${name}" "${file_path}" \; set-option status \; set set-titles-string "${name} (tmux@${HOST})"
fi
t() { run_under_tmux rtorrent; }
irc() { run_under_tmux irssi "TERM='screen' command irssi"; }
over_ssh() {
if [ -n "${SSH_CLIENT}" ]; then
return 0
else
return 1
fi
reload () {
exec "${SHELL}" "$@"
confirm() {
local answer
echo -ne "zsh: sure you want to run '${YELLOW}$@${NC}' [yN]? "
read -q answer
echo
if [[ "${answer}" =~ ^[Yy]$ ]]; then
command "${=1}" "${=@:2}"
else
return 1
fi
confirm_wrapper() {
if [ "$1" = '--root' ]; then
local as_root='true'
shift
fi
local runcommand="$1"; shift
if [ "${as_root}" = 'true' ] && [ "${USER}" != 'root' ]; then
runcommand="sudo ${runcommand}"
fi
confirm "${runcommand}" "$@"
poweroff() { confirm_wrapper --root $0 "$@"; }
reboot() { confirm_wrapper --root $0 "$@"; }
hibernate() { confirm_wrapper --root $0 "$@"; }
detox() {
if [ "$#" -ge 1 ]; then
confirm detox "$@"
else
command detox "$@"
fi
has() {
local string="${1}"
shift
local element=''
for element in "$@"; do
if [ "${string}" = "${element}" ]; then
return 0
fi
done
return 1
begin_with() {
local string="${1}"
shift
local element=''
for element in "$@"; do
if [[ "${string}" =~ "^${element}" ]]; then
return 0
fi
done
return 1
termtitle() {
case "$TERM" in
rxvt*|xterm|nxterm|gnome|screen|screen-*)
local prompt_host="${(%):-%m}"
local prompt_user="${(%):-%n}"
local prompt_char="${(%):-%~}"
case "$1" in
precmd)
printf '\e]0;%s@%s: %s\a' "${prompt_user}" "${prompt_host}" "${prompt_char}"
preexec)
printf '\e]0;%s [%s@%s: %s]\a' "$2" "${prompt_user}" "${prompt_host}" "${prompt_char}"
esac
esac
git_check_if_worktree() {
# This function intend to be only executed in chpwd().
# Check if the current path is in git repo.
# We would want stop this function, on some big git repos it can take some time to cd into.
if [ -n "${skip_zsh_git}" ]; then
git_pwd_is_worktree='false'
return 1
fi
# The : separated list of paths where we will run check for git repo.
# If not set, then we will do it only for /root and /home.
if [ "${UID}" = '0' ]; then
# running 'git' in repo changes owner of git's index files to root, skip prompt git magic if CWD=/home/*
git_check_if_workdir_path="${git_check_if_workdir_path:-/root:/etc}"
else
git_check_if_workdir_path="${git_check_if_workdir_path:-/home}"
git_check_if_workdir_path_exclude="${git_check_if_workdir_path_exclude:-${HOME}/_sshfs}"
fi
if begin_with "${PWD}" ${=git_check_if_workdir_path//:/ }; then
if ! begin_with "${PWD}" ${=git_check_if_workdir_path_exclude//:/ }; then
local git_pwd_is_worktree_match='true'
else
local git_pwd_is_worktree_match='false'
fi
fi
if ! [ "${git_pwd_is_worktree_match}" = 'true' ]; then
git_pwd_is_worktree='false'
return 1
fi
# todo: Prevent checking for /.git or /home/.git, if PWD=/home or PWD=/ maybe...
# damn annoying RBAC messages about Access denied there.
if [ -d '.git' ] || [ "$(git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2> /dev/null)" = 'true' ]; then
git_pwd_is_worktree='true'
git_worktree_is_bare="$(git config core.bare)"
else
unset git_branch git_worktree_is_bare
git_pwd_is_worktree='false'
fi
git_branch() {
git_branch="$(git symbolic-ref HEAD 2>/dev/null)"
git_branch="${git_branch##*/}"
git_branch="${git_branch:-no branch}"
git_dirty() {
if [ "${git_worktree_is_bare}" = 'false' ] && [ -n "$(git status --untracked-files='no' --porcelain)" ]; then
git_dirty='%F{green}*'
else
unset git_dirty
fi
precmd() {
# Set terminal title.
termtitle precmd
if [ "${git_pwd_is_worktree}" = 'true' ]; then
git_branch
git_dirty
git_prompt=" %F{blue}[%F{253}${git_branch}${git_dirty}%F{blue}]"
else
unset git_prompt
fi
preexec() {
# Set terminal title along with current executed command pass as second argument
termtitle preexec "${(V)1}"
chpwd() {
git_check_if_worktree
man() {
if command -v vimmanpager >/dev/null 2>&1; then
PAGER="vimmanpager" command man "$@"
else
command man "$@"
fi
# Are we running under grsecurity's RBAC?
rbac_auth() {
local auth_to_role='admin'
if [ "${USER}" = 'root' ]; then
if ! grep -qE '^RBAC:' "/proc/self/status" && command -v gradm > /dev/null 2>&1; then
echo -e "\n${BLUE}*${NC} ${GREEN}RBAC${NC} Authorize to '${auth_to_role}' RBAC role."
gradm -a "${auth_to_role}"
fi
fi
#rbac_auth
# Check if we started zsh in git worktree, useful with tmux when your new zsh may spawn in source dir.
git_check_if_worktree
if [ "${git_pwd_is_worktree}" = 'true' ]; then
git_branch
git_dirty
git_prompt=" %F{blue}[%F{253}${git_branch}${git_dirty}%F{blue}]"
else
unset git_prompt
fi
# Le features!
# extended globbing, awesome!
setopt extendedGlob
# zmv - a command for renaming files by means of shell patterns.
autoload -U zmv
# zargs, as an alternative to find -exec and xargs.
autoload -U zargs
# Turn on command substitution in the prompt (and parameter expansion and arithmetic expansion).
setopt promptsubst
# Control-x-e to open current line in $EDITOR, awesome when writting functions or editing multiline commands.
autoload -U edit-command-line
zle -N edit-command-line
bindkey '^x^e' edit-command-line
# Include user-specified configs.
if [ ! -d "${ZSHDDIR}" ]; then
mkdir -p "${ZSHDDIR}" && echo "# Put your user-specified config here." > "${ZSHDDIR}/example.zsh"
fi
for zshd in $(ls -A ${HOME}/.config/zsh.d/^*.(z)sh$); do
. "${zshd}"
done
# Completion.
autoload -Uz compinit
compinit
zstyle ':completion:*' matcher-list 'm:{a-z}={A-Z}'
zstyle ':completion:*' completer _expand _complete _ignored _approximate
zstyle ':completion:*' menu select=2
zstyle ':completion:*' select-prompt '%SScrolling active: current selection at %p%s'
zstyle ':completion::complete:*' use-cache 1
zstyle ':completion:*:descriptions' format '%U%F{cyan}%d%f%u'
# If running as root and nice >0, renice to 0.
if [ "$USER" = 'root' ] && [ "$(cut -d ' ' -f 19 /proc/$$/stat)" -gt 0 ]; then
renice -n 0 -p "$$" && echo "# Adjusted nice level for current shell to 0."
fi
# Fancy prompt.
if over_ssh && [ -z "${TMUX}" ]; then
prompt_is_ssh='%F{blue}[%F{red}SSH%F{blue}] '
elif over_ssh; then
prompt_is_ssh='%F{blue}[%F{253}SSH%F{blue}] '
else
unset prompt_is_ssh
fi
case $USER in
root)
PROMPT='%B%F{cyan}%m%k %(?..%F{blue}[%F{253}%?%F{blue}] )${prompt_is_ssh}%B%F{blue}%1~${git_prompt}%F{blue} %# %b%f%k'
PROMPT='%B%F{blue}%n@%m%k %(?..%F{blue}[%F{253}%?%F{blue}] )${prompt_is_ssh}%B%F{cyan}%1~${git_prompt}%F{cyan} %# %b%f%k'
esac
# Ignore lines prefixed with '#'.
setopt interactivecomments
# Ignore duplicate in history.
setopt hist_ignore_dups
# Prevent record in history entry if preceding them with at least one space
setopt hist_ignore_space
# Nobody need flow control anymore. Troublesome feature.
#stty -ixon
setopt noflowcontrol
# Fix for tmux on linux.
case "$(uname -o)" in
'GNU/Linux')
export EVENT_NOEPOLL=1
esac
# Aliases
alias cp='cp -iv'
alias rcp='rsync -v --progress'
alias rmv='rsync -v --progress --remove-source-files'
alias mv='mv -iv'
alias rm='rm -iv'
alias rmdir='rmdir -v'
alias ln='ln -v'
alias chmod="chmod -c"
alias chown="chown -c"
if command -v colordiff > /dev/null 2>&1; then
alias diff="colordiff -Nuar"
else
alias diff="diff -Nuar"
fi
alias grep='grep --colour=auto'
alias egrep='egrep --colour=auto'
alias ls='ls --color=auto --human-readable --group-directories-first --classify'
# Keys.
case $TERM in
rxvt*|xterm*)
bindkey "^[[7~" beginning-of-line #Home key
bindkey "^[[8~" end-of-line #End key
bindkey "^[[3~" delete-char #Del key
bindkey "^[[A" history-beginning-search-backward #Up Arrow
bindkey "^[[B" history-beginning-search-forward #Down Arrow
bindkey "^[Oc" forward-word # control + right arrow
bindkey "^[Od" backward-word # control + left arrow
bindkey "^H" backward-kill-word # control + backspace
bindkey "^[[3^" kill-word # control + delete
linux)
bindkey "^[[1~" beginning-of-line #Home key
bindkey "^[[4~" end-of-line #End key
bindkey "^[[3~" delete-char #Del key
bindkey "^[[A" history-beginning-search-backward
bindkey "^[[B" history-beginning-search-forward
screen|screen-*)
bindkey "^[[1~" beginning-of-line #Home key
bindkey "^[[4~" end-of-line #End key
bindkey "^[[3~" delete-char #Del key
bindkey "^[[A" history-beginning-search-backward #Up Arrow
bindkey "^[[B" history-beginning-search-forward #Down Arrow
bindkey "^[Oc" forward-word # control + right arrow
bindkey "^[Od" backward-word # control + left arrow
bindkey "^H" backward-kill-word # control + backspace
bindkey "^[[3^" kill-word # control + delete
esac
bindkey "^R" history-incremental-pattern-search-backward
bindkey "^S" history-incremental-pattern-search-forward
if [ -f ~/.alert ]; then cat ~/.alert; fi
Thanks for all the help.
Last edited by Shark (2013-05-11 22:32:24)

Raynman wrote:
"This expression doesn't work", "It doesn't work" ...
Could you try being a bit more specific?
Firstly, i am sorry i didn't post the output. I should have know better.
Secondly, chill out.
I have used above regex with grep command. Output from terminal is:
zsh: bad pattern: ^[^#]
In bash it works perfectly.
If i issue "setopt re_match_pcre" i have the same ouput as above.
EDIT: If i issue "unsetopt no_match" it actually works but i have to change the regex from "\^\[^#]" to "\^[^#]" otherwise i get the same output as above. In bash both options work.
Last edited by Shark (2013-05-11 22:07:21)

Introduction to regular expressions ...

I'm well aware that there are already some articles on that topic, some people asked me to share some of my knowledge on this topic. Please take a look at this first part and let me know if you find this useful. If yes, I'm going to continue on writing more parts using more and more complicated expressions - if you have questions or problems that you think could be solved through regular expression, please post them.
Introduction
Oracle has always provided some character/string functions in its PL/SQL command set, such as SUBSTR, REPLACE or TRANSLATE. With 10g, Oracle finally gave us, the users, the developers and of course the DBAs regular expressions. However, regular expressions, due to their sometimes cryptic rules, seem to be overlooked quite often, despite the existence of some very interesing use cases. Beeing one of the advocates of regular expression, I thought I'll give the interested audience an introduction to these new functions in several installments.
Having fun with regular expressions - Part 1
Oracle offers the use of regular expression through several functions: REGEXP_INSTR, REGEXP_SUBSTR, REGEXP_REPLACE and REGEXP_LIKE. The second part of each function already gives away its purpose: INSTR for finding a position inside a string, SUBSTR for extracting a part of a string, REPLACE for replacing parts of a string. REGEXP_LIKE is a special case since it could be compared to the LIKE operator and is therefore usually used in comparisons like IF statements or WHERE clauses.
Regular expressions excel, in my opinion, in search and extraction of strings, using that for finding or replacing certain strings or check for certain formatting criterias. They're not very good at formatting strings itself, except for some special cases I'm going to demonstrate.
If you're not familiar with regular expression, you should take a look at the definition in Oracle's user guide Using Regular Expressions With Oracle Database, and please note that there have been some changes and advancements in 10g2. I'll provide examples, that should work on both versions.
Some of you probably already encountered this problem: checking a number inside a string, because, for whatever reason, a column was defined as VARCHAR2 and not as NUMBER as one would have expected.
Let's check for all rows where column col1 does NOT include an unsigned integer. I'll use this SELECT for demonstrating different values and search patterns:
WITH t AS (SELECT '456' col1
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '123x'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT 'x123'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT 'y'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '+789'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '-789'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '159-'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '-1-'
             FROM dual
SELECT t.col1
FROM t
WHERE NOT REGEXP_LIKE(t.col1, '^[0-9]+$')
;Let's take a look at the 2nd argument of this REGEXP function: '^[0-9]+$'. Translated it would mean: start at the beginning of the string, check if there's one or more characters in the range between '0' and '9' (also called a matching character list) until the end of this string. "^", "[", "]", "+", "$" are all Metacharacters.
To understand regular expressions, you have to "think" in regular expressions. Each regular expression tries to "fit" an available string into its pattern and returns a result beeing successful or not, depending on the function. The "art" of using regular expressions is to construct the right search pattern for a certain task. Using functions like TRANSLATE or REPLACE did already teach you using search patterns, regular expressions are just an extension to this paradigma. Another side note: most of the search patterns are placeholders for single characters, not strings.
I'll take this example a bit further. What would happen if we would remove the "$" in our example? "$" means: (until the) end of a string. Without this, this expression would only search digits from the beginning until it encounters either another character or the end of the string. So this time, '123x' would be removed from the SELECTION since it does fit into the pattern.
Another change: we will keep the "$" but remove the "^". This character has several meanings, but in this case it declares: (start from the) beginning of a string. Without it, the function will search for a part of a string that has only digits until the end of the searched string. 'x123' would now be removed from our selection.
Now there's a question: what happens if I remove both, "^" and "$"? Well, just think about it. We now ask to find any string that contains at least one or more digits, so both '123x' and 'x123' will not show up in the result.
So what if I want to look for signed integer, since "+" is also used for a search expression. Escaping is the name of the game. We'll just use '^\+[0-9]+$' Did you notice the "\" before the first "+"? This is now a search pattern for the plus sign.
Should signed integers include negative numbers as well? Of course they should, and I'll once again use a matching character list. In this list, I don't need to do escaping, although it is possible. The result string would now look like this: '^[+-]?[0-9]+$'. Did you notice the "?"? This is another metacharacter that changes the placeholder for plus and minus to an optional placeholder, which means: if there's a "+" or "-", that's ok, if there's none, that's also ok. Only if there's a different character, then again the search pattern will fail.
Addendum: From this on, I found a mistake in my examples. If you would have tested my old examples with test data that would have included multiple signs strings, like "--", "-+", "++", they would have been filtered by the SELECT statement. I mistakenly used the "*" instead of the "?" operator. The reason why this is a bad idea, can also be found in the user guide: the "*" meta character is defined as 0 to multiple occurrences.
Looking at the values, one could ask the question: what about the integers with a trailing sign? Quite simple, right? Let's just add another '[+-] and the search pattern would look like this: '^[+-]?[0-9]+[+-]?$'.
Wait a minute, what happened to the row with the column value "-1-"?
You probably already guessed it: the new pattern qualifies this one also as a valid string. I could now split this pattern into several conditions combined through a logical OR, but there's something even better: a logical OR inside the regular expression. It's symbol is "|", the pipe sign.
Changing the search pattern again to something like this '^[+-]?[0-9]+$|^[0-9]+[+-]?$' [1] would return now the "-1-" value. Do I have to duplicate the same elements like "^" and "$", what about more complicated, repeating elements in future examples? That's where subexpressions/grouping comes into play. If I want only certain parts of the search pattern using an OR operator, we can put those inside round brackets. '^([+-]?[0-9]+|[0-9]+[+-]?)$' serves the same purpose and allows for further checks without duplicating the whole pattern.
Now looking for integers is nice, but what about decimal numbers? Those may be a bit more complicated, but all I have to do is again to think in (meta) characters. I'll just use an example where the decimal point is represented by ".", which again needs escaping, since it's also the place holder in regular expressions for "any character".
Valid decimals in my example would be ".0", "0.0", "0.", "0" (integer of course) but not ".". If you want, you can test it with the TO_NUMBER function. Finding such an unsigned decimal number could then be formulated like this: from the beginning of a string we will either allow a decimal point plus any number of digits OR at least one digits plus an optional decimal point followed by optional any number of digits. Think about it for a minute, how would you formulate such a search pattern?
Compare your solution to this one:
'^(\.[0-9]+|[0-9]+(\.[0-9]*)?)$'
Addendum: Here I have to use both "?" and "*" to make sure, that I can have 0 to many digits after the decimal point, but only 0 to 1 occurrence of this substrings. Otherwise, strings like "1.9.9.9" would be possible, if I would write it like this:
'^(\.[0-9]+|[0-9]+(\.[0-9]*)*)$'Some of you now might say: Hey, what about signed decimal numbers? You could of course combine all the ideas so far and you will end up with a very long and almost unreadable search pattern, or you start combining several regular expression functions. Think about it: Why put all the search patterns into one function? Why not split those into several steps like "check for a valid decimal" and "check for sign".
I'll just use another SELECT to show what I want to do:
WITH t AS (SELECT '0' col1
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '0.'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '.0'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '0.0'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '-1.0'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '.1-'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '.'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '-1.1-'
             FROM dual
SELECT t.*
FROM t
;From this select, the only rows I need to find are those with the column values "." and "-1.1-". I'll start this with a check for valid signs. Since I want to combine this with the check for valid decimals, I'll first try to extract a substring with valid signs through the REGEXP_SUBSTR function:
NVL(REGEXP_SUBSTR(t.col1, '^([+-]?[^+-]+|[^+-]+[+-]?)$'), ' ')Remember the OR operator and the matching character collections? But several "^"? Some of the meta characters inside a search pattern can have different meanings, depending on their positions and combination with other meta characters. In this case, the pattern translates into: from the beginning of the string search for "+" or "-" followed by at least another character that is not "+" or "-". The second pattern after the "|" OR operator does the same for a sign at the end of the string.
This only checks for a sign but not if there also only digits and a decimal point inside the string. If the search string fails, for example when we have more than one sign like in the "-1.1-", the function returns NULL. NULL and LIKE don't go together very well, so we'll just add NVL with a default value that tells the LIKE to ignore this string, in this case a space.
All we have to do now is to combine the check for the sign and the check for a valid decimal number, but don't forget an option for the signs at the beginning or end of the string, otherwise your second check will fail on the signed decimals. Are you ready?
Does your solution look a bit like this?
WHERE NOT REGEXP_LIKE(NVL(REGEXP_SUBSTR(t.col1,
                           '^([+-]?[^+-]+|[^+-]+[+-]?)$'),
                       '^[+-]?(\.[0-9]+|[0-9]+(\.[0-9]*)?)[+-]?$'
                      )Now the optional sign checks in the REGEXP_LIKE argument can be added to both ends, since the SUBSTR won't allow any string with signs on both ends. Thinking in regular expression again.
Continued in Introduction to regular expressions ... continued.
C.
Fixed some embarrassing typos ... and mistakes.
cd

Excellent write up CD. Very nice indeed. Hopefully you'll be completing parts 2 and 3 some time soon. And with any luck, your article will encourage others to do the same....I know there's a few I'd like to see and a few I'd like to have a go at writing too :-)

Regular Expressions in Oracle

Hello All,
I come from Perl scripting language background. Perl's regular expressions are rock solid, robust and very fast.
Now I am planning to master Regular Expressions in Oracle.
Could someone please point the correct place to start with it like official Oracle documentation on Regular Expressions, any good book on Regex or may be any online link etc.
Cheers,
Parag
Edited by: Parag Kalra on Dec 19, 2009 11:03 AM

Hi, Parag,
Look under [R in the index of the SQL language manual|http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28286/index.htm#R]. All the regular expression functions and operators start with "REGEXP", and there are a couple of entries under "regular expressions".
That applies to the Oracle 11 and 10.2 documentation. Regular expressions were hidden in the Oracle 10.1 SQL Language manual; you had to look up some similar function (like REGR_SYY, itself hidden under S for "SQL Functions", and then step through the pages one at a time.
Sorry, I don't know a good tutorial or introduction.
If you find something hopeful, please post a reference here. I think a lot of people would be interrested.

Regular Expressions and Full-text Requests.

Hi,
i have just read that Berkeley DB XML doesnt support regexp in XQuery (what a pity),
do you know how to look-alike regular expressions in Query?
for example, i'd like to perform a full-text request, all tags that contains text like "Be.+ley" (it would return tags that contains text like "Berkeley" or "Beverley"), how can i do that?
Thx.

Hi,
A performant way to do something like you want is with a query that mixes use of contains() (index optimized) and matches() (not index optimized). Something like this:
collection()//tag[contains(., "Be") and contains(., "ley") and matches(., "Be.+ley")]John

Regular Expressions in CS5.5 - something is wrong

Hello Everybody,
Please correct me, but I think, I found a serious problem with regular Expressions in Indesign CS5.5 (and possibly in other apps from CS5.5).
Let's start with simple example:
var range = "a-a,a,a-a,a";
var regEx = /(a+-a+|a+)(,(a+-a+|a+))*/;
alert( "Match:" +regEx.test(range)+"\nLeftContext: "+RegExp.leftContext+"\nRightContext: "+RegExp.rightContext );
What I expected was true match and the left and the right context should be empty. In Indesign CS3 that is correct BUT NOT in CS5.5.
In CS 5.5 it seems that the only first "a-a" is matched and the rest is return as the rightContext - looks like big change (if not parsing error in RegExp engine).
Please correct me if I am wrong.
The second example - how to freeze ID CS5.5:
var range = "a-a,a,a-a,a";
var regEx = /(a+-a+|a+)(,(a+-a+|a+)){8,}/;
alert( "Match:" +regEx.test(range)+"\nLeftContext: "+RegExp.leftContext+"\nRightContext: "+RegExp.rightContext );
As you can see it differs only with the {8,} part instead of *
Run it in CS5.5 and you will see that the ID hangs (in CS3 of course it runs flawlessly}.
The third example - how to freeze ID 5.5 in one line (I posted it earlier in Photoshop forum because similiar problem was called earlier):
alert((/(n|s)? /gmi).test('s') );
As you can guess - it freezes the CS5.5 (CS3 passes the test).
Please correct me if I am doing something wrong or it's the problem of Adobe.
Best regards,
Daniel Brylak

Hi Daniel,
Thanks for sharing. Really annoying indeed.
Just to complete your diagnosis, what you describe about CS.5 is the same in CS5, while CS4 behaves as CS3.
var range = "aaaaa";
var regEx = /(a+-a+|a+)(,(a+-a+|a+))*/;
alert([
    "Match:" +regEx.test(range),
    "LeftContext: "+RegExp.leftContext.toSource(),        // => CS3/4: EMPTY -- CS5+: EMPTY
    "RightContext: "+RegExp.rightContext.toSource()        // => CS3/4: EMPTY -- CS5+: ",a,a-a,a"
    ].join('\r'));
So there is a serious implementation problem of the RegExp object from ExtendScript CS5.
I don't think it's related to the greedy modes. By default, JS RegExp quantifiers are greedy, and /a*/ still entirely captures "aaaaaa" in CS5+.
By the way, you can make any quantifier non-greedy by adding ? after the quantifier, e.g.: /a*?/, /a+?/, etc.
I guess that Adobe ExtendScript has a generic issue in updating the RegExp.lastIndex property in certain contexts—see http://forums.adobe.com/message/3719879#3719879 —which could explain several bugs such as the Negative Class bug —see http://forums.adobe.com/message/3510078#3510078 — or the problems you are mentioning today.
@+
Marc

Regular expressions (gnu.regexp) (porting)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for