Replace joins with normal query
hi experts ,
can u help me out splving in this issue.
i want to convert this query in to normal query I.e with out usin gany joins .pls help me out.
select a~ebeln
b~ebelp
b~loekz
a~bukrs
a~wkurs
a~lifnr
a~ekorg
a~ekgrp
a~waers
a~bedat
b~txz01
b~menge
b~meins
b~netpr
b~elikz
b~erekz
b~wepos
b~weunb
b~repos
b~webre
b~matkl
c~eindt
from ekko as a
inner join ekpo as b
on aebeln eq bebeln
inner join eket as c
on bebeln eq cebeln
and bebelp eq cebelp
into corresponding fields of table t_ekko_ekpo
where a~bukrs in s_bukrs
and lifnr in s_lifnr
and ekorg in s_ekorg
and ekgrp in s_ekgrp
and a~bedat in s_bedat.
and c~eindt in s_eindt.
Thanks in advance ,
Hi all,
Can someone tell me if it is possible to replace a
call like
<jbo:ShowValue datasource="dsNews"
dataitem="NisStory" /> with
String s = jbo.ShowValue(dsNews,NisStory)? Or if there
is another way to get the output of the tag into a
String?One way to do it would be to wrap the execution of <jbo:ShowValue/> with a body tag that captures its body and writes it to a variable in the pageContext. The usage would be something like:
<mytaglib:capture var="aString">
<jbo:ShowValue/>
</mytaglib:capture>
the capture tag handler would take the body content in the doAfterBody callback and expose it as "aString" in the pageContext attributes.
>
Thanks in advance.
Regards BasBr - J
Similar Messages
-
I have written the below query, our requirement is, Some employees have "Transport Allowance" but not "Project Allowance". For this, I tried to use OUTER JOIN with this query. But this query takes long time and failed. The following query works fine if the employee has both "Transport Allowance" and "Project Allowance" (without outer join) Now, I also need to retrieve the employees who have "Transport Allowance" but not "Project Allowance". How can I retrieve it?
SELECT DISTINCT papf.employee_number
, peev.screen_entry_value Transport_Allowance
,peev1.screen_entry_value Project_Allowance
FROM apps.per_all_people_f papf
,apps.per_all_assignments_f paaf
,apps.pay_element_types_x petf
,apps.pay_element_types_x petf1
,apps.pay_element_types_x petf2
,apps.pay_element_entries_f peef
,apps.pay_element_entries_f peef1
,apps.pay_element_entries_f peef2
,apps.pay_element_entry_values_x peev
,apps.pay_element_entry_values_x peev1
,apps.pay_element_entry_values_x peev2
,apps.pay_input_values_x pivf
,apps.pay_input_values_x pivf1
,apps.pay_input_values_x pivf2
WHERE
papf.person_id = paaf.person_id
AND paaf.assignment_id = peef.assignment_id
AND paaf.assignment_id = peef1.assignment_id
AND paaf.business_group_id = papf.business_group_id
--Transport Allowance
AND peef.element_entry_id = peev.element_entry_id
AND petf.element_Name = 'Transport Allowance'
AND pivf.element_type_id =petf.element_type_id
AND pivf.name = 'Allowance'
AND peev.input_value_id= pivf.input_value_id
--Project Allowance
AND peef1.element_entry_id = peev1.element_entry_id
AND petf1.element_Name = "Project Allowance'
AND pivf1.element_type_id = petf1.element_type_id
AND pivf1.name = 'Allowance'
AND peev1.input_value_id = pivf1.input_value_id
AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN peev.effective_start_date AND peev.effective_end_date)
AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN peev1.effective_start_date AND peev1.effective_end_date)
AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN papf.effective_start_date AND papf.effective_end_date)
ORDER BY papf.employee_number
Thanks in advance.I am using sames tables with alias to retrieve the columns values from the same table.
Here is my query.
SELECT DISTINCT papf.employee_number
, peev.screen_entry_value Transport_Allowance
,peev1.screen_entry_value Project_Allowance
FROM apps.per_all_people_f papf
,apps.per_all_assignments_f paaf
,apps.pay_element_types_x petf
,apps.pay_element_types_x petf1
,apps.pay_element_entries_f peef
,apps.pay_element_entries_f peef1
,apps.pay_element_entry_values_x peev
,apps.pay_element_entry_values_x peev1
,apps.pay_input_values_x pivf
,apps.pay_input_values_x pivf1
WHERE
papf.person_id = paaf.person_id
AND paaf.assignment_id = peef.assignment_id
AND paaf.assignment_id = peef1.assignment_id
AND paaf.business_group_id = papf.business_group_id
--Transport Allowance
AND peef.element_entry_id = peev.element_entry_id
AND petf.element_Name = 'Transport Allowance'
AND pivf.element_type_id =petf.element_type_id
AND pivf.name = 'Allowance'
AND peev.input_value_id= pivf.input_value_id
--Project Allowance
AND peef1.element_entry_id = peev1.element_entry_id
AND petf1.element_Name = "Project Allowance'
AND pivf1.element_type_id = petf1.element_type_id
AND pivf1.name = 'Allowance'
AND peev1.input_value_id = pivf1.input_value_id
AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN peev.effective_start_date AND peev.effective_end_date)
AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN peev1.effective_start_date AND peev1.effective_end_date)
AND (SYSDATE BETWEEN papf.effective_start_date AND papf.effective_end_date)
ORDER BY papf.employee_number
Thanks in advance. -
Joining with sub query not working
Hi
I am new with these complex queries. I am trying to join a sub query to a query as below;
SELECT Events1.InvoiceBatch AS BatchNo, Events1.InvoiceBatchDate AS BatchDate, tblClients.Company, tblClients.ID AS ClientID, COUNT(Events1.ID) AS Invoices,
COUNT(*) - COUNT(Events1.InvoicePrintDate) AS E, Events1.InvoiceBatchFromDate AS BatchFrom, Events1.InvoiceBatchToDate AS BatchTo, (SELECT EventID, SUM(Total) FROM tblStaffBookings AS StaffBookings WHERE StaffBookings.EventID = Events1.ID GROUP BY EventID) AS Total
FROM tblEvents AS Events1 LEFT OUTER JOIN
tblClients ON Events1.ClientID = tblClients.ID
WHERE (Events1.FactoringExportDate IS NULL) OR (Events1.AccountsExportDate IS NULL) OR (Events1.InvoiceSentDate IS NULL)
GROUP BY Events1.InvoiceBatch, Events1.InvoiceBatchDate, tblClients.Company, tblClients.ID, Events1.InvoiceBatchFromDate, Events1.InvoiceBatchToDate
HAVING (Events1.InvoiceBatch = 5212)
ORDER BY tblClients.Company
I am getting these two errors;
Msg 8120, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
Column 'tblEvents.ID' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause.
Msg 116, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
Only one expression can be specified in the select list when the subquery is not introduced with EXISTS.
What am I missing?
Thanks
RegardsSELECT Events1.InvoiceBatch AS BatchNo, Events1.InvoiceBatchDate AS BatchDate, tblClients.Company, tblClients.ID AS ClientID, COUNT(Events1.ID) AS Invoices,
COUNT(*) - COUNT(Events1.InvoicePrintDate) AS E, Events1.InvoiceBatchFromDate AS BatchFrom, Events1.InvoiceBatchToDate AS BatchTo,Total
FROM tblEvents AS Events1 LEFT OUTER JOIN
tblClients ON Events1.ClientID = tblClients.ID
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT EventID, SUM(Total) AS Total FROM tblStaffBookings AS StaffBookings WHERE StaffBookings.EventID = Events1.ID GROUP BY EventID) sb
ON sb.EventID = Events1.ID
WHERE (Events1.FactoringExportDate IS NULL) OR (Events1.AccountsExportDate IS NULL) OR (Events1.InvoiceSentDate IS NULL)
GROUP BY Events1.InvoiceBatch, Events1.InvoiceBatchDate, tblClients.Company, tblClients.ID, Events1.InvoiceBatchFromDate, Events1.InvoiceBatchToDate,Total
HAVING (Events1.InvoiceBatch = 5212)
ORDER BY tblClients.Company
Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
Please Vote This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
Visakh
My Wiki User Page
My MSDN Page
My Personal Blog
My Facebook Page
Says;
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Line 5
The multi-part identifier "Events1.ID" could not be bound.
on
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT EventID, SUM(Total) AS Total FROM tblStaffBookings AS StaffBookings WHERE StaffBookings.EventID = Events1.ID GROUP BY EventID) sb
Regards -
Replace taglib with normal call
Hi all,
Can someone tell me if it is possible to replace a call like
<jbo:ShowValue datasource="dsNews" dataitem="NisStory" /> with
String s = jbo.ShowValue(dsNews,NisStory)? Or if there is another way to get the output of the tag into a String?
Thanks in advance.
Regards BasHi all,
Can someone tell me if it is possible to replace a
call like
<jbo:ShowValue datasource="dsNews"
dataitem="NisStory" /> with
String s = jbo.ShowValue(dsNews,NisStory)? Or if there
is another way to get the output of the tag into a
String?One way to do it would be to wrap the execution of <jbo:ShowValue/> with a body tag that captures its body and writes it to a variable in the pageContext. The usage would be something like:
<mytaglib:capture var="aString">
<jbo:ShowValue/>
</mytaglib:capture>
the capture tag handler would take the body content in the doAfterBody callback and expose it as "aString" in the pageContext attributes.
>
Thanks in advance.
Regards BasBr - J -
Replacing a inner join with for all entries
Hi Team,
In a already developed program I am replacing a inner join with select query follow up with for-all-entris and passing the data to final internal table but in both the case the result should be same then only my replacement will be correct. But my no records in both cases differs. This happening because when i am selecting data from first data base table is 32 lines. then I am doing fo-all-entries moving all the duplicate entries then the no records are four. but in final internal table i am looping the first internal table. So in final internal table the no of records are 32. But in inner join query the records are 16.So please let me know how resolve this issue?
Thanks and REgards
DeepaHi Thomas,
Thanks for ur suggestion.
The solved that in below.
In select query I did not change anything The way I had written the code was correct.
I think many of us know how to write that how to make the performance better in that way.
I made the change when I transfered the to final internal table.
The original Inner join code:
select a~field1 a~field2 a~field3 b~field2 b~field3 b~field4
from dbtab1 as a inner join dbtab2 as b
on a~field1 = b~field1 into it_final where
a~field1 in s_field1. [Field1 in both the table are key field]
Before code:
Sort itab1 by key-fields.
sort itab2 by keyfields.
loop at itab1 into wa1.
move: wa1-field1 to wa_final-field1,
wa1-field2 to wa_final-field2,
wa1-field3 to wa_final-field3.
read table itab2 into wa2 witk key field1 = wa1-field1 binary search.
if sy-subrc = 0.
move : wa2-field2 to wa_final-field4,
wa2-field3 to wa_final-field5,
wa2-field4 to wa_final-field6.
append wa_final to it_final.
endif.
Clear : wa1, wa2, wa_final.
endloop.
In this case if the one key fieild value is not present there in second internal table but its there in first internal table still it will read that row with 2nd internal values having zeroes. Normally what does not happen in inner join case if the key field value will same in both the case ,then that will fetch only those rows.
Changed Code
loop at itab1 into wa1.
read table itab2 into wa2 witk key field1 = wa1-field1 binary search.
if sy-subrc = 0.
move: wa1-field1 to wa_final-field1,
wa1-field2 to wa_final-field2,
wa1-field3 to wa_final-field3.
move : wa2-field2 to wa_final-field4,
wa2-field3 to wa_final-field5,
wa2-field4 to wa_final-field6.
append wa_final to it_final.
endif.
Clear : wa1, wa2, wa_final.
endloop.
In this case the values will read to final internal table if both key field matches.
With Regards
Deepa -
Dear Sir/Madam
I'm a student who is interested in Oracle Database and
I have some problems with JOIN and Sub-query.
I hope so many of you could help me.
if i use JOIN without sub-query, may it be faster or not?
SELECT field1, field2 FROM tableA INNER JOIN tableB
if i use JOIN with sub-query, may it be faster or not?
SELECT field1,field2,field3 FROM tableA INNER JOIN (SELECT field1,field2 FROM tableB)
Thanks in advance!Hi,
fac30d8e-74d3-42aa-b643-e30a3780e00f wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam
I'm a student who is interested in Oracle Database and
I have some problems with JOIN and Sub-query.
I hope so many of you could help me.
if i use JOIN without sub-query, may it be faster or not?
SELECT field1, field2 FROM tableA INNER JOIN tableB
if i use JOIN with sub-query, may it be faster or not?
SELECT field1,field2,field3 FROM tableA INNER JOIN (SELECT field1,field2 FROM tableB)
Thanks in advance!
As the others have said, the execution plan will give you a better idea about which is faster.
If you're trying to see how using (or not using) a sub-query affects performance, make the rest of the queries as similar as possible. For example, include field3 in both queries, or ignore field3 in both queries.
In this particular case, I guess the optimizer would do the same thing either way, but that's just a guess. I can't see your execution plans.
In general, simpler code is faster, and better in other ways, too. In this case
tableB
is simpler than
(SELECT field1, field2 FROM tableB)
Why do you want a sub-query in this example? -
Maximum number of tables that can be outer joined with one table in a query
Hi All,
Iam new to sql, so can you please let me know What is the maximum number of tables that can be outer joined with one table in a query?
Thanks,
Srinisrinu2 wrote:
Iam new to sql, so can you please let me know What is the maximum number of tables that can be outer joined with one table in a query?
There is no limit to the number of tables you can outer join as long as you join them correctly.
SQL> with a as
2 (
3 select 1 id, 2 b_key, 3 c_key from dual union all
4 select 2 id, 1 b_key, 4 c_key from dual union all
5 select 3 id, 3 b_key, 1 c_key from dual union all
6 select 4 id, 4 b_key, 2 c_key from dual
7 ),
8 b as
9 (
10 select 1 id, 1 c_key2 from dual union all
11 select 2 id, 5 c_key2 from dual union all
12 select 3 id, 3 c_key2 from dual union all
13 select 4 id, 2 c_key2 from dual
14 ),
15 c as
16 (
17 select 1 key1, 1 key2, '1-1' dta from dual union all
18 select 1 key1, 2 key2, '1-2' dta from dual union all
19 select 1 key1, 3 key2, '1-3' dta from dual union all
20 select 1 key1, 4 key2, '1-4' dta from dual union all
21 select 2 key1, 1 key2, '2-1' dta from dual union all
22 select 2 key1, 2 key2, '2-2' dta from dual union all
23 select 2 key1, 3 key2, '2-3' dta from dual union all
24 select 2 key1, 4 key2, '2-4' dta from dual union all
25 select 3 key1, 1 key2, '3-1' dta from dual union all
26 select 3 key1, 2 key2, '3-2' dta from dual union all
27 select 3 key1, 3 key2, '3-3' dta from dual union all
28 select 3 key1, 4 key2, '3-4' dta from dual union all
29 select 4 key1, 1 key2, '4-1' dta from dual union all
30 select 4 key1, 2 key2, '4-2' dta from dual union all
31 select 4 key1, 3 key2, '4-3' dta from dual union all
32 select 4 key1, 4 key2, '4-4' dta from dual
33 )
34 select d.a_id, d.b_id, c.key1 as c_key1, c.key2 as c_key3, c.dta
35 from
36 c,
37 (
38 select
39 a.id as a_id, b.id as b_id, a.c_key, b.c_key2
40 from a, b
41 where a.b_key = b.id
42 ) d
43 where d.c_key = c.key1 (+)
44 and d.c_key2 = c.key2 (+);
A_ID B_ID C_KEY1 C_KEY3 DTA
3 3 1 3 1-3
4 4 2 2 2-2
2 1 4 1 4-1
1 2
SQL> -
Outer join with effective date in peoplesoft query
Hi,
I'm trying to join two tables using outer join. Both tables are effective dated:
Dept_Tbl: dept_id, status, effdt
Tips_Tbl: dept_id, tips_id, effdt
Not all records in Dept_Tbl are in Tips_Tbl. I need to get all active depts and their most recent tips_id if they have one.
select a.dept_id, b.tips_id
from dept_tbl a, tips_tbl b
where a.status = 'Active'
and a.effdt =
(select max(a_ed.effdt) from dept_tbl a_ed
where a.dept_id = a_ed.dept_id
and a_ed.effdt <= SYSDATE)
and b.dept_id(+) = a.dept_id
and b.effdt =
(select max(b_ed.effdt) from tips_tbl b_ed
where b.dept_id = b_ed.dept_id
and b.tips_id = b_ed.tips_id
and b_ed.effdt <= SYSDATE)
The query only returns records that are in both tables.
Is there a way for outer join to work with effective dates?
Thanks in advance,
RegHere is an example of one solution. Note the use of NVL on both sides of the equal sign since both sides could be NULL in the case of the outer join
with dept_tbl as (select 1 dept_id, SYSDATE effdt FROM DUAL),
tips_tbl as (select 1 dept_id, NULL effdt FROM DUAL)
select a.effdt
from dept_tbl a,
tips_tbl b
where b.dept_id(+) = a.dept_id
and NVL(b.effdt, SYSDATE) = NVL((select max(b_ed.effdt)
from tips_tbl b_ed
where b.dept_id = b_ed.dept_id
and b_ed.effdt <= SYSDATE), SYSDATE);
EFFDT
5/7/2007 3:25:00 PM -
Hello SDN:
We are on BW 3.5 SP16.
We are currently using a replacement path Query(RP) with variables
to populate a variable in another Query(T).
The problem we are having is with performance.
The entry of variables in replacement path Query(RP) is optional (This is necessary there cannot be required values)
When results from Replacement Path Query are small performance is fine. (e.g. 10 seconds)
When results from Replacement path query are large performance suffers. (e.g. 1+ minutes)
Users are free to leave the replacement path variables empty resulting in a large set of data to be replaced. This is the worst performance case.
We would like to discover a way to conditionally execute the replacement path query. That is if users do not enter values for the replacement Query(RP) variables do not execute the replacement path query(RP).
Does anyone know if this is possible within reason and in customer exit space?
We have reviewed the situation from all angles and the requirement for the replacement path FUNCTIONALITY and the freedom for the user to leave variable values blank remains.
I've been searching and reading SDN and SAP notes for about a week and do not find threads which address this situation.
We are also exploring Customer variable exits to mimic replacement path functionality
(different topic subject="How do I...Mimic Replacement Path with Query using Customer Variable Exits?")
Any help will be appreciated
Many thanks
David SchuhMy appologies-I posted this message with the wrong subject. I will repost it with appropriate subject.
dave schuh -
Can we perform Join operation using SQLCall with Datatabae Query
Hi,
I am working on Toplink SQLCall query. I am performing join operation but, it is giving error.
so please, any can tell me . we can perform join operation using SQLCall with Database Query
Thanking You.You can use joining with SQLCall queries in TopLink, provided your SQL returns all of the required fields.
What is the query you are executing and what error are you getting? -
Can anyone give me examples of replacement path with query?
hi all,
Can anyone give me examples of replacment path with query. if u have any docs pls send it across to my email id [email protected]
thanxs
hariHere is an example:
Lets assume you have a characteristic( Say Project) with about 30 attributes. now your requirement is to display all 30 attributes and about 10 keyfigures and another characteristic and it's attributes...
If Project has about 25K projects in a Year,you will find its very difficult to diasply all the inofmation with one Query.(you may get disconnected from server after executing the query)..
So firstly,create a Query1 only with Project and keyfigures.
then create another Query2 only with Project and its attributes...here create a variable on Projeect with replacementpath and select the Query1.So you will have the Projects only from Query1.
Create Query3 with Project and other chars.create one more variable on Project with replacementpath select Query1 result. So this Query also gets Projects from Query1...
Now Query2 and Query3 get Projects from Query1 always...so you will have same Projects in your all 3 Queries..
Now crate a workbook and insert 3 Queries.make sure you insert Query1 lastly.Since last inserted query will be executed first...
You may use VBA or excel functionality if you want to see whole data in one sheet.
Hope this helps. -
I have a window asking: do you want to replace the existing Normal.dotm? what should i do? I'm on OSX 10.7.5 with Office 365 14.3.2 for mac 2011.
That is not what I said.
Normal.dotm is a template, not a .doc file. It is the template that every new document is based upon, IF you changed any of the template settings (font size or other attributes) then you will be prompted to save the changes.
Did you? (or is this an old Windows Template) -
SQL Server Multiple JOINS with Table Value Function - query never ends
I have a query with 4 joins using a table value function to get the data and when I execute it the query never ends.
Issue Details
- Table value function
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[GetIndicator]
@indicator varchar(50),
@refDate datetime
RETURNS
TABLE
AS
RETURN
SELECT
T1.Id ,T1.ColINT_1, T1.ColNVARCHAR_1 collate DATABASE_DEFAULT as ColNVARCHAR_1 ,T1.ColNVARCHAR_2 ,T1.ColSMALLDATETIME_1, T1.ColDECIMAL_1, T1.ColDECIMAL_1
FROM TABLE2 T2
JOIN TABLE3 T3
ON T2.COLFKT3 = T3.Id
AND T3.ReferenceDate = @RefDate
AND T3.State != 'Deleted'
JOIN TABLE4 T4
ON T2.COLFKT4 = T4.Id AND T4.Name=@indicator
JOIN TABLE1 T1
ON T2.COLFKT1=T1.Id
- Query
DECLARE @RefDate datetime
SET @RefDate = '30 April 2014 23:59:59'
SELECT DISTINCT OTHERTABLE.Id As Id
FROM
GetIndicator('ID#1_0#INDICATOR_X',@RefDate) AS OTHERTABLE
JOIN GetIndicator('ID#1_0#INDICATOR_Y',@RefDate) AS YTABLE
ON OTHERTABLE.SomeId=YTABLE.SomeId
AND OTHERTABLE.DateOfEntry=YTABLE.DateOfEntry
JOIN GetIndicator('ID#1_0#INDICATOR_Z',@RefDate) AS ZTABLE
ON OTHERTABLE.SomeId=ZTABLE.SomeId
AND OTHERTABLE.DateOfEntry=ZTABLE.DateOfEntry
JOIN GetIndicator('ID#1_0#INDICATOR_W',@RefDate) AS WTABLE
ON OTHERTABLE.SomeId=WTABLE.SomeId
AND OTHERTABLE.DateOfEntry=WTABLE.DateOfEntry
JOIN GetIndicator('ID#1_0#INDICATOR_A',@RefDate) AS ATABLE
ON OTHERTABLE.SomeId=ATABLE.SomeId
AND OTHERTABLE.DateOfEntry=ATABLE.DateOfEntry
Other details:
- SQL server version: 2008 R2
- If I execute the table function code outside the query, with the same args, the execution time is less the 1s.
- Each table function call return between 250 and 500 rows.Hi,
Calling function in general is a costly query. And definitely joining with a function 5 times in not an efficient one.
1. You can populate the results for all parameters in a CTE or table variable or temporary table and join (instead of funtion) for different parameters
2. Looks like you want fetch the IDs falling to different indicators for the same @Refdate. You can try something like this
WITH CTE
AS
SELECT
T1.Id ,T1.ColINT_1, T1.ColNVARCHAR_1 collate DATABASE_DEFAULT as ColNVARCHAR_1 ,T1.ColNVARCHAR_2 ,T1.ColSMALLDATETIME_1, T1.ColDECIMAL_1, T1.ColDECIMAL_1, T4.Name
FROM TABLE2 T2
JOIN TABLE3 T3
ON T2.COLFKT3 = T3.Id
AND T3.ReferenceDate = @RefDate
AND T3.State != 'Deleted'
JOIN TABLE4 T4
ON T2.COLFKT4 = T4.Id AND T4.Name=@indicator
JOIN TABLE1 T1
ON T2.COLFKT1=T1.Id
SELECT * FROM CTE WHERE Name = 'ID#1_0#INDICATOR_X' AND Name = 'ID#1_0#INDICATOR_Y' AND Name = 'ID#1_0#INDICATOR_Z' AND Name = 'ID#1_0#INDICATOR_W' AND Name = 'ID#1_0#INDICATOR_A' AND ReferenceDate = @RefDate.
Or you can even simplify more depends on your requirement.
Regards,
Brindha. -
Join with another table in pre-query
Hi,
We have a large data block and we need to order some columns based on street name for example, not id. The base table of db block contains an id_street column, and 'streets' table contains id and name.
Ok, in pre-query trigger of that block, we have a complex logic and we dynamically build the where clause. At the end, we set the order_By clause of the block, to order the rows, for example we need to order by the 'my_date' column asc (it's a date type column), and street desc; but street NAME, not id. We don't want to use a from clause query, because the dynamically where clause logic it's complex.
How can we join the db block table with 'streets' table in pre-query, so when constructing the order by clause to specify something like
set_block_property('ADRESE_NEZONATE', order_by, 'my_date, name desc');where 'name' is the name of the street, from the 'streets' table.
Is it possible in pre-query, somehow? Or, in my case where can I join with that table and use that column in pre-query at setting order by?
Thanks!
Edited by: Roger25 on 26.04.2013 12:31I understand what you say but partially.. please explain in more detail how to do that;
How should look the adrese_nezonate block, then? I have to add a 'name' column and set copy value from item property to 'STREETS.NAME', and database_property No?
Then the post-query trigger how should look like (the order by clause)? The post-query sends the entire query (with where/order by clauses) to the server, but in that "select... where... order by" (built dynamically) there are only columns from that block (adrese_nezonate). I need to join with streets, INSIDE that query.
Thanks. -
Query the new inserted but not committed row join with db
Hi,
I have one vo based on two EOs, one is for update and another is for reference. When inserting a new row, is there any way I can retrieve the data from the reference EM based on the join condition for the new inserted row from the reference EO. If the inserted row is committed, it is not an issue. Before the commit, the join is between the memory and db. I tried to set the VO query mode to
ViewObject.QUERY_MODE_SCAN_ENTITY_ROWS|ViewObject.QUERY_MODE_SCAN_UNPOSTED_ENTITY_ROW, it does not get the column values from the reference EO.
If I use sql, I insert row in one table, then join query this table and another table, within the same transaction, I can get the new row joining with other table rows before committing the trans.
Thx
HuI think you don't need to change the query execution mode
check [url http://blogs.oracle.com/shay/entry/whenvalidateitem_trigger_in_ad]When-Validate-Item trigger in ADF with PPR
Maybe you are looking for
-
I bought a cd and downloaded it to my itunes account. I want to burn one to keep in my car, but dont get that option. how can i burn it from my itunes account?
-
Windows 7 Clean Install Elements 7 Install
I am going to upgrade Windows Vista to Windows 7 with a clean install. I will have a backup of my hard drive. After I do the clean install of Windows 7 and install Elements 7 how do I get Elements 7 back to the way it was in Vista. I am particularly
-
Hi All, After doing enhancements for an extractor in ecc, replicated the datasource in bi. When i try to load its giving, A version different from M version. I am unable to activate the datasource.
-
Why won't Itunes store my music library in my User/Music Folder? If I select my user name as a storage location in Itunes, Itunes creates folders for artist name right in my user folder, instead of in my user/music folder. This gets especially anno
-
Final cut pro crashes on import
Regardless of file type. Final Cut crashes immediately after selecting file to import. It even crashes when trying to import from the iSight camera. It captures video and then once you hit stop it crashes. I have reinstalled under multiple accounts,