Report for Discrepancy report in QM

Hi All,
Whethwer Anybody did report on this Discrepancy report.
This Discrepancy report is between "INSPECTION CHARACTARASTICS and SPECIFICATION CLASSES"
Here by i am using "C1F5_specifications_READ " function module, to read Specification data
RMXT412_GET_INSPECTION_PLANS for getting Inspection Plan data.
Please let me know Report if possible
Madhu

hi
is this te one are you looking for
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_smehp1/helpdata/en/43/2f40b6853e0d23e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_smehp1/helpdata/en/43/2f40b6853e0d23e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm]
jansi

Similar Messages

To know api for discrepancy report.....(in order managment)

hii,
dudes,
i want know concurrent program for discrepancy report in order managment.. for
shipped order.....
.

hiii,
dude
i want to know about concurrent program for discrepancy report.......for shipped order......

Oracle query for getting discrepancy equip codes

I need help in getting a query for discrepancy equip_code
select distinct eq.dept_id,eq.drive_id,equip_code,eq.qc_subtype_id,staff_id
from qc_equipment_used eq, qc_daily qc
where eq.drive_id = qc.drive_id
and trunc(eq.create_time) = '06-aug-2012'
and out_of_service = 'N'
and eq.qc_subtype_id in (1026,1012)
and eq.drive_id = 'DRV2016637'
DEPT_ID|DRIVE_ID|EQUIP_CODE|QC_SUBTYPE_ID|STAFF_ID
95|DRV2016637|HEMORYA121|1012|0011
95|DRV2016637|HEMORYA121|1026|0011
95|DRV2016637|HEMORYA148|1012|0011
I need help in getting a query to show the user that
95|DRV2016637|HEMORYA148|1012|0011
was qc'd in the morning but not in the evening for 1026

You still refuse to read {message:id=9360002} and follow the Forum Etiquette?
How sad for you, since less volunteers will help you.

In-Store Issue - Signatures

To Whom It May Concern:
I've tried searching the website for awhile, but have been unable to locate an email address for customer service contact.
Today, 11/9/14, I accompanied a friend to the Verizon store on the Avenue in White Marsh, MD to upgrade his phone. Dave, the sales representative working with us, was very helpful in understanding the changes with the new tiered plans (we were originally on the unlimited data plan, which we were told we were no longer allowed to keep, so much for loyalty), explaining the phone features, and the Verizon edge. Upon check-out time, Dave's tablet was having issues processing the changes. After a few tries, we were moved to the back of the store at the computers.
Due to the Edge plan, the only payment due today was the purchased phone case. While processing on the computers, a signature box popped up on the credit card payment device for $293.85. This did not make sense for just a case and Dave could not even find that number on his computer screen. He went to get the manager Kenya. She seemed perturbed by the interruption and informed him that the device "always says that" and to "just sign." I said no, we were not signing or authorizing charges that said an amount we weren't paying. She replied asking if we had swiped a credit card, we said no, and then with attitude asked "now how did we think we were going to get charged if we didn't swipe?" I answered that my friend has a card on file to pay his bill and she snapped that the store and the online accounts are not linked. I'm sure that her and Dave cannot see the card number, but considering this is going through MyVerizon, which his card is attached to, that information is connected in some manner. At this point, she declared that she would sign, and leaned over the counter, took the stylus, and signed for him. (Should be between 4:10 pm and 4:30pm if you'd like to verify with the security system footage)
I'm appalled that an employee, especially a member of management, would sign for him. I do not see how that is an acceptable action in the slightest. She was rude and over stepped boundaries. Sure, she didn't sign his exact name, but she also didn't write anything like "Customer Refused" or "Machine Display Incorrect", she made the standard squiggle signature, one I'm sure most everyone has made at some point, so it looks like it could very well be credible. Inaccurate machines are not an excuse - Kenya indicated that this problem had been ongoing for quite some time. Resolve it; either repair or replace the equipment; do not ask customers for their signatures, which indicate an acceptance of liability for any of the terms attached for charges they did not accrue.
I certainly would not sign for something that was incorrect and I most certainly do not find it a conscionable business practice that Verizon managers believe they can sign for a customer.
Best regards,
Brooke

My concern is not that the receipt/transaction is currently incorrect, it is that an employee felt that they could reach over the counter and sign the pad for us. According to her, we were signing an okay to upgrade phones. According to the screen, the signature was authorizing Verizon to charge $293.85. I understand that the store does not personally have access to the credit card, but they do have access to the account that has the credit card linked. She would not skip the step or clear the transaction because "it would just happen again - the machine always says that". If they are asking for signatures, they need to get the screen fixed, not continue with the defect. Not only are they asking for discrepant signatures, but she was rude and wrong in her methods of "correcting the problem". It was clearly not the first time a customer was not okay with the screen.

Camera Raw Color Temperature Issue

Help me verify color temperature issue please.
I shoot with Canon EOS 5D.
I sat white balance mode to K - Manual Kelvin temperature - and set value to 6000K.
So my raw files should have this setting - color temperature 6000K.
Canon ZoomBrowser EX shows me the value - 6000K
Nevertheless I see different reading in Adobe Camera RAW converter (as shot)?
Photoshop CS2 Camera Raw CT=5600K Tint=+3 (! as Shot !)
Why?

Ramon seemed to have the answer in hand, then G Sch above chimed in with some random comment about coordinate systems. Weirdly, Ramon then agreed with G Sch's nonsense and thanked him for it. Suddenly the thread has suffered an ineluctable defenestration.
Is:
- camera maker's control for XXXX Kelvin wrong?
- Adobe's control for XXXX Kelvin wrong?
- the use of the designator "K" in these contexts wrong, as it implies physics reference for the measure while the camera and ACR just do their own thing?
By the logic used in this thread, 1/250sec shutter doesn't have anything to do with a time standard, nor does F4 mean an aperture, it's just a coordinate in a locally defined system, la la la. So why bother to even code it in EXIF? What's the point of providing a control in terms of K if K isn't normalized?
The question was answered at Ramon's first post: ACR doesn't read the 5D white bal metadata. The camera K setting is used for in-camera processing and by Canon utilities. But note that the raw data are white bal agnostic but white bal results are subject to a camera profile which may differ between OEM and ACR, and at which point there is room for discrepancy for interpretation of color. Which one is right? I can't say. It's important to realize the results for a given K setting may differ between OEM and ACR because of this. Contrary to what G Sch writes above, the same K setting ought to give the same results if a "Kelvin" setting is to have real meaning, but the seems to be impracticable if the developers don't agree on the characterization of the gear.

Weird Problem in New MacBook

Just transferred my system from Ibook to MacBook. Used Migration, for files and settings, not applications.
"Space Used" info in Hard Drive states 30G. Total of all folders in Hard Drive listed in Finder states only 20G when they are totaled. Big difference!
Took it it to Genius Bar, no answer after he carefully went thru the system, no duplicate files, HD verifies fine, permissions fine etc.. On my own, I looked thru "Invisible Files", nothing to account for discrepancy. I forced emptied the Trashes, still no answer. Advice was to leave it, as the computer works fine and I will. But it's a puzzle. 10G is a LOT of unaccounted space.
Only thing I can think of: in Ibook I used Shredit a few times to shred empty space in HD. Last time I stopped it in mid-stream. It noted a file was left on root of HD that I could delete or return to. Around the same period. When it transferred to the MacBook I deleted it. In ibook around the same period, I could no longer do a HD Repair in Disk Utility, errors were shown. However, system functioned fine, so it was odd but did not effect anything. I thought this had some bearing on the MacBook space discrepancy. On the other hand, there never was such a discrepancy on the Ibook. So, maybe not.
Only other point of note: it took 3 Migrations to get all my data transferred. With a support tech, I deleted all folders listed as "Old Mac 2", "Old Mac", etc., from the multiple migrations.
Two migrations were mostly 0 size anyway.
Any ideas on this odd situation?

You can get rid of any extra printer drivers in those folders, just make sure you keep the ones for the printer(s) you use.
And yes, the sleep image is supposed to be the same size as your RAM--and you don't want to go deleting that! Also, don't go deleting the swapfiles.
If you have items in the Private>var>log folder, those can be deleted without causing issues.
Hopefully that helps clear things up!
~Lyssa

Ciscoworks 3.2 api

Hi - runnning LMS 3.2 we would like to provide access to redseal software app and users. Not having done this before, what is the best methodology ? is there a specific document also ?
Thanks in advance -

Hi
I guess that depends on what you are trying to achieve. There are many different API's within LMS.
Using CM as an example :
Data Extraction Engine (DEE) is a utility that provides servlet access to User Tracking, Layer 2 topology, and discrepancy data. (Allows you to use Campus Manager discrepancy APIs to retrieve latest discrepancy data from Campus Manager server).
The following are the schemas used for exporting the user tracking data in XML format:
Schema for User Tracking Data
User Tracking Schema for Switch Data
User Tracking Schema for Phone Data
User Tracking Schema for Subnet Data
Schema for Topology Data
Schema for Discrepancy Data
Using Servlet to Export Data from Campus Manager
RME 4.2:
The Baseline template uses java.util.regex engine for regular expressions. For more information, see the regex API guide for Java 1.4.2 from Sun: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/util/regex/Pattern.html
As well as configuration archive APIs among others.
This is a quick and certainly incomplete look at just 2 modules. You best bet would be to engage you account team.
But not knowing your final objectives then the below links may prove helpful to you.
Here is the link to Open Database Schema Support in CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution 3.2
And you may be simply looking for SDK Developers Guide for CiscoWorks Common Services 3.2 Northbound API 1.1

ASR901 y.1731 Latest Data Table Not Populated

Why would SNMP data for a y.1731 test on an ASR901 not be populated in the ipslaEtherJitterLatestStatsEntry table?
All the data in the table is being populated with zeros, even though valid tests are being performed. There is data in the ipslaEtherJitterAggStatsEntry but only getting zeros when polling the latest table.
I have verified that following objects exist per the MIB:
- rttMonCtrlAdminRttType
- rttMonEchoAdminProtocol
Please let me know if you need anything else.

Hi,
Q Table is generated if we have time dependent display attributes for base Info Object where as Y Table is generated if we have at least one attribute defined as time-dependent navigational attribute.
Normally both Q and Y table contain same no.of entries, however in your case the reason could be that SID for some records might not have generated(assuming this could be the reason) hence you are seeing this discrepancy in record count.
Also before you proceed with any action in RSRV, you can check the records which are missing from Y table and analyze the reason for it. In RSRV if there is any is inconsistency we can see reason(error message) for inconsistency which helps us to understand the cause for this inconsistency.
By analyzing this way we can know reason for discrepancy.
Regards,
Venu Gopal

Data Error in the Query/Report after selective data deletion for infocube

Hi Experts,
Please advise what i was missing and what went wrong...
I got a Query (Forecast) on a Multicube...which is based on 2 Infocubes with Aggregates...
As i identified some data discrepency..yesteraday i performed selective data deleation on one of the Infocube
and executed report yesteraday and the results in the query are correct...
When today i executed the same report i am getting different results..
When i compared the results of the report with that of data in cube they are not matching
The report is not displaying the data in cube..for some rows it is displaying the data in the cube but for some rows it is just displaying same as the above row
there is no data loaded into info cube after selective deleation
Do i need to perform request compression and fill the aggregated after selective deleation
Please advise what went wrong

Hi Venkat,
No i haven't done anything on aggregates before or after selective delete
As there is not data load after the selective delete according to SAP Manual we don't need to perform any thing on aggregates...as selective data deletion on cube will delete data from aggregates as well
Please update how to identify error

MB5L Report Discrepacy for Material and Stock Account Currency

I have found in the MB Report Discrepancy for Material and Stock Account Currency. Why is this happening? Why is there a variance between total price in materials and stock account? Anyone please help me. I'm abaper but now been pushed to do logistic. I need help for this issue.

Hi,
Here's some information from help. Variances can occur for the following reasons:
You have entered postings to the stock account manually.
The stock account includes not only stock postings, but also other postings. In this case, you should check the account determination in the Customizing for Valuation and Account Assignment. Make sure that the stock accounts are used solely for the transaction key BSX (stock postings).
Check Account Determination - OMWB
The account assignment for the stock accounts (transaction key BSX) was changed during productive operation; the respective stocks, however, were not deducted from the old account (movement type 562) and posted to the new one (movement type 561).
Cheers !

STOCK REPORT FOR AUDIT

Hi GUYS
I am working for a Garment Industry and the audit is in next month end.
I need your advice in how to catch up with the things related to Stock for Audit.
We have 3-4 locations in System
Like
FABRIC STORE
CUTTING STORE
STICHING STORE
FINISHING STORE
FINISHED GOOD STORE(from there the material gets dispached EXPORT/LOCAL)
I need to maintain the STOCK from Cutting to Finishing , Stock at Sub Contractor, How much dispached and how much left, rejected etc
Please Advice how to do the things.
I know its all related to MB51 MB52, MBLB, ME2L, MC.9, MB5B ETC
But i am Confused from where to start and how to proceed.
I dont even know from which report the auditor will get the details and ask us
SHD i take the Physical report ie Work in progress report in my hand first or shd i take the SAP Reports first
I am looking after the following things
SUB COntracting PO
STO
GRN(Fabric, CUT PART , ACCESSORIES ETC)
Out Bound Dillivery
PI
CI
EI
Work Related to PP Making production orders etc
Need a procedure to maintain the stuff in SAP
Thanks & REGards
Abhishek

Dear Abhishek,
It all depends on how efficiently your company Uses SAP, If company has properly entered all the transactions that take place on a day to day basis in SAP, then there is nothing which can't be answered to the Auditor, its all Integrated and you can see all the stock movements that have happend, If required you can go for a Physical Inventory Count Also so that these is no discrepancy in the system stock and Physical Stock.
Rest for any material if any question comes up then you can readily use MB5B which will give the material movements in a specified period along with Opening and Closing Stock. The basic questions which Auditors Put up is on the movement of Stock and sometimes the reason for the movement, so if everything is maintained properly in SAP you will have no issues in getting any data.

Font Issue with Report Generation Toolkit for Microsoft Office

I have been using this toolkit for only a few days now, but I just have to get this issue off my back. When developing a toolkit it would be a good idea to use the same cluster to represent fonts in ALL places. If you look at "Excel Set Graph Font" vs. "Excel Easy Table" they take two completely different clusters. Why? I don't know, but it is *very* annoying.
How could something like this slip through the cracks? Is there some reason why there is this discrepancy? From my perspective as a software engineer I see no excuse, but maybe someone else can justify this oversight for me. I just hope that I don't find any more issues with the toolkit...
Naveen.

Naveen,
what you said is true when dealing with same kind of objects, but in this circumstance, different cluster defines the font of a differnt object. For example, you may not want the user have as many options with defining the font for the X Y axis title as that for defining the text in the table. This is ture when you want your generated report to have similiar styles.
But this is certainly something we will think about, thanks for your constructive suggestion,
XD Gao
Application Engineer
National Instruments

Inventory Audit Report and Inventory G/L Account discrepancy

Good Day!
Hi Everybody. I had experienced a discrepancy between the Inventory Audit Report and Inventory G/L Account.
Before everything else, our client does not have any PO, GRPO. Only A/P Invoice and A/P Credit Memos so there are no difference being posted.
There were also no transactions posted directly in Inventory G/L Account but from observation, there is a minor difference. This only happened with two transactions in AP Invoice with Negative Quantity.
The AP Invoice is composed of a single item, the unit price is 180.00 x -58 pcs quantity. Total amount is -10,440.00.
G/L Account posting is
Inventory 10,440.00
A/P 10,440.00
In the FIFO layering, the item cost is 200.00 (based on the current stock value) and the current stock quantity before posting is 80 pcs . Since this is a negative quantity A/P Invoice, it seems that the cost of the item when the transaction will be posted is 200 (based on the current stock value) so when I view the Inventory Audit Report amount, it says the inventory cost/posting is -11,600 (200 x -58).
But on actual G/L Account, the posting is -10,440.00 from A/P Invoice, that's why the inventory discrepancy occurs. It seems that SAP B1's Inventory Audit Report confuses the FIFO cost posted versus G/L Account's posted based on the document. Since the document is A/P Invoice, SAP B1 assumes that the transaction will post the amount as the additional inventory cost and posting the inventory cost into Inventory G/L Account. However, since this is a negative document, the system is releasing the items, thus, FIFO kicks in. The Inventory Audit Report catches the amount based on FIFO costing. The problem is that the Inventory Audit Report is more accurate than the Inventory G/L Balance.
Any suggestion to fix this guys?

HI,
i'my afraid you're in the wrong place. This is the Chinese forum. Please go to SAP Business One Application for help.
Best

Crystal Reports 2008 parameter panel discrepancy.

Hi,
I have a report designed using Crystal Reports 2008. The report has a dynamic parameter called Location which is populated from a table. It is a Value - Description pair so it is:
Value = LocID
Descripition = LocationName.
The Show on Viewer(Panel) attribute is set to Editable.
The Prompt with Description Only attribute is set to true.
In the Crystal Reports stand-alone Designer everything works fine. It prompts with the Description. After making a selection, the Parameter Panel shows the selected items(the Description, NOT the value) correctly. This is the desired behavior.
But when the report is viewed in the Crystal Reports Viewer that comes with .NET 2008 the Parameter panel shows the Value, which is LocID and not the description which is LocationName. This is NOT very useful.
I have tried other third party Crystal Reports viewers as well. They all exhbit the same discrepancy.
How can this be resolved?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
- Rajan.

Hi Don,
Thank you for your response. The assemblies and their versions are as follows;
CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine - 12.0.2000.0
CrystalDecisions.Enterprise.Framework - 12.0.1100.0
CrystalDecisions.Shared - 12.0.2000.0
CrystalDecisions.Windows.Forms - 12.0.2000.0
Thanks,
- Rajan.

Discrepancy in report execution duration

Hello,
Everyday we are executing audit reports which tells us report execution time for all our daily scheduled reports. Here we have observed some discrepancy between the time shown in the instance history verses auditing report's data. For example, if XYZ report took 120 seconds to execute, our auditing report shows 110 seconds only (-10 sec difference); however instance status in report history shows 120 sec only.
Here are environment details:
Product: SAP BI 4.0 SP6 Patch 6
Server OS: Windows Server 2008 R2
CMS DB: Oracle 11g R2
Auditing DB: Oracle 11g R2
We would like to know why there is a difference? Please advise!
Regards,
Daya Jha

Issue resolved after doing multiple activity.
- Adding 2 new cluster in PRD environment, After refering Server sizing Guide from SAP
- Adding 4 new Web Intelligence Processing Server in PRD environment
- Assign Static port in all 4 Nodes, Previously it was Dynamic Ports
- Proper spiliting of APS as per SAP APS Sliting KBA (1792286 ,1694041)
- Change Maximum Connection Paremeter in Web Intelligence Processing Server, Because we have more Web Intelligence Business user to view the Web Intelligence reports.By Default SAP provided 50 Connections.
- Change in Tomcat Parameters like
Parameter                Old Value      New Value
XX:MaxPermSize      384 M          512 M
Maximum Memory     2,048           4,096
maxThreads              200              900
Thanks,
Daya

Report for Discrepancy report in QM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for