Responsive images look like triple exposures

I'm using Dreamweaver 6, fluid grid layout.
Whether I insert a single image or use picturefill/matchemedia I have the same problem. Sometimes one or another of my graphics show up looking like a triple exposure. It can happen in ff, ie or chrome, sometimes on startup, sometimes when I've been using them a while. Sometimes I can clear cache and history, reload, and get straightened out, sometimes not.
Is there a secret code beyond the media query so the images arrive right every time?

Aww. Back in the old days when cameras had film and manual frame forwarding, if you forgot to forward the frame your exposure would be on top of the one just taken.
This one I just caught in firefox is a mild example. The error is browser agnostic and it presents differently every time it happens.
the image here is a jpg inserted straight from the image file into the fluid layout grid.

Similar Messages

  • How to convert a image layer to a text layer any idea? a image looks like a text in layers box

    How to convert a image layer to a text layer any idea? a image looks like a text in layers box

    You can't convert an image into a text layer.  What you can do is clip an image to a text layer so that just the image layer shows up where there is text.  Create a text layer, then above it put your image layer.  Hold down the alt/opt key and click between the two layers to clip them.

  • Making an image look like its on a canvas?

    Hi guys,
    I am using Photoshop CS5, I generally find it very good and love the features it gives me, i however am having trouble trying to achieve something but i dont know if it can be done,
    I am going to be selling Canvas Prints and i dont know if theres anyway i can make a jpg image look like its on a canvas or even turn the image to a canvas design, this includes making it look 3d. The reason for doing this is it will save me having to manufacture every single image i have onto a canvas for a photo.
    I hope somebody can help me
    Regards
    Lee

    'Transform' can skew rectangular shapes to have perspective. Here's a loosely related tutorial or two...
    http://www.tutorial9.net/tutorials/photoshop-tutorials/designing-a-software-box/
    http://psd.tutsplus.com/tutorials/tools-tips/create-a-3d-software-box-in-photoshop-using-a ctions/

  • Combining multiple layers into one "final image" then working on each layer's opacity to affect what the final image looks like

    Ideally the "final" image would be displayed.  I'd go over to the layers panel and work on each layer, dialing up and down the opacity and see the effects on the "final" image.  This is in regards to interior real estate.  Normally I combine my images in Photomatix (different exposures) and have that method down.  But what I'd like to be able to do is to, say, strobe different areas of the scene while shooting maybe six images (same exposure), load those six into CS5 (File>Scripts>Load Files Into Stack) then proceed.
    I've looked at a ton of videos on Youtube and searched CS5 Help and just can't find the answer to what exactly what I'm trying to do.  I can choose Edit>Auto-Blend Layers and that does indeed give me a final image (like in Enfuse or Photomatix) but I haven't found a way to then adjust each individual layer to affect that final image.  And I know there's a way, maybe coming at this from a completely different direction.  Thanks.

    Ok I will take the last question first, since that is probably the easiest.end
    A merged file or a flattened file is the same thing as a composite.
    A merged file still has its transparency and data that is outside the canvas area.
    A flattened file is a merged file that is converted to a background layer that does not support transparency or data outside the canvas.
    A composite can be a merged copy of the existing layers if you use the multiple key strokes I mentioned above. Whereas a merged file is a composite of the original layers. So I personally use the term composite to mean a copy as merged and flatten already explain that process, no need to give them an additional term to mean the same thing.
    Generally blend modes work by selecting individual layers before changing the blend mode. However you can group the layers or convert them to a smart object and apply a blend to that group or object.
    Normally you set the blend mode as you work on each layer. But you could set all of them to overlay or reduce the opacity to 30 or 50 percent to see through all the layers, then adjust them later on.
    I am not sure how it works on the mac, but on windows you can select the blend text box then use the up and down arrow keys to change the blend mode to see how it looks.
    I recommend that you go through the free videos on layers, masks, opacity, and layer styles. This will help you dramatically. Also a few books on the subject will help has well.
    (free)
    http://creativesuitepodcast.com/
    http://kelbytv.com/
    http://tv.adobe.com/
    http://www.youtube.com/
    (pay)
    http://kelbyone.com/
    http://Lynda.com

  • How do u make an image look like a bubble?

    After cutting it in a circle, i need it to look like its on the surface of a bubble. I don't mean the Spherize filter. I want the entire cropped image to look curved like a bubble or a water droplet. Please help.

    Assuming you have 3D capability you could try 3D > New Mesh from Layer > Mesh Preset > Sphere. This will wrap your image around an actual 3D sphere. You may need to experiment with cropping or enlarging your background area to get your desired results, and since it's 3D you can rotate it and adjust lighting and material attributes. If you want to alter the shape to, e.g. an egg or a falling drop of water, you could render and flatten your 3D sphere and then use the warp tool to adjust as desired.

  • New Folder Image Looks Like Document Image

    I read somewhere that you could change icons to anything you wanted.  I went ahead and did this and it went perfectly.  I then looked into this further and found that you could change the defult folder image to anything you wanted, so that when you created a new folder it wouldnt be the boring blue.  I followed the instructions and went to the following folder:
    /System/Library/CoreServices/CoreTypes.bundle/Contents/Resources/
    In this folder, I found the icon called GenericFolderIcon.icns.  I replaced that with the same name and restarted the dock using the killall Dock command in terminal, nothing happened and I tried some similar things until I finally removed the actual icon from the Resources folder, brought it to my desktop, found the image I wanted, renamed said image, and put the new image into the Resources folder.  My folders now look like a blank document, as opposed to what I wanted them to look like.  Below I have attached 2 images.  An image of the desired folder and an image of what the folders look like now.  I also tried removing the icon image and restarting to comuter in hopes that the computer would generate a new icon, this did not happen.
         ^Current Folder Image^          ^Desired Folder Image^

    You can't convert an image into a text layer.  What you can do is clip an image to a text layer so that just the image layer shows up where there is text.  Create a text layer, then above it put your image layer.  Hold down the alt/opt key and click between the two layers to clip them.

  • How to make images look like live website for presentation?

    I've created a website mockup in Photoshop and need to present them online to a client. I'm wondering if there's a simple app or technique of how I can "play" the images so they feel like they're scrolling up and down or page to page like a live website? No clicking necessary, but maybe a nice 60 second loop "movie" (?) of the images in the browswer so they get the feel of how things will flow from page to page. Any creative ideas or links of others that have done this? Cheers.

    In the effects panel type "light" in the search box. This will bring up all the lighting effects in Pr. Adjusr/Lighting or Stylize/Strobe might work for you. There are a lot of adjustments you can key in until you find what suits your needs.

  • Bug? Images look different in photoshop

    Hi,
    Am hoping somebody can help me as I must be doing something really stupid here. I'm currently evaluating various workflow products, and really like Lightroom but find that whenever I import an image into LR the tones, particular shadow tones, look way too dark. They look kinda posterised.
    My monitor is color calibrated with a spyder. I am running Windows XP.
    I've attached a link to an image to demonstrate. I took an sRGB JPEG and imported into LR. I then edited a copy in PS (exported as ProPhoto - converted in PS to Adobe 1988 colorspace), another copy is shown exported to Capture NX (also Adobe colorspace).
    http://www.hamiltonconsulting.net/strange%20tones.jpg
    if you look at the shadow tones in the folds of the jacket you can see a minor difference between PS and Capture NX but you can see a clear difference in LR. The shadows are way darker.
    The image opens fine it every other application I have tried, including the free XP viewers. LR is doing something strange to the file but I cant work out what.
    I first noticed the problem occuring in Beta 4.1 and am now getting the same issue in the new Lightroom demo ( I had hoped it was a bug that would have been fixed). I have been installing all sorts of evaluation software of late, so maybe something hasnt been cleaned out of my registry, or something is clashing.
    So far, I've tried lots of different images (all with the same problem). Recreating an image database. Reinstalling LR (countless times).
    Does anyone have any ideas as to what I can try or do I need to reinstall my entire PC

    Yeah dude, that totally makes sense.
    "I notice blocking... that... really is a function of lighting..."
    Is that some sort of new-age yet-unheard-of phenomenon? If so, please elaborate by all means.
    The point is that the image looks like crap displayed in the 'Library' module of LR, but looks fine in any other program. Because no other program is content with sitting around and displaying to you a low quality JPEG preview of your, say, high quality 16-bit uncompressed TIFF image.
    That's why there's no blocking in the image loaded up in Photoshop. Yet it's there in LR because LR doesn't bother to render the image 'on-the-fly' until you step into the 'Develop' module.
    You don't believe me? Then be happy in your ignorance.
    On another note, though, instead of jacking it up to 400% when it's clearly evident at 100%, try calibrating your monitor with a hardware profiler so dark parts of images don't become a muddy mess of blacks. Be forewarned though that it's a double-edged sword: on the one hand, after calibration, you suddenly begin to see details in shadows that you may never before have seen; on the other hand, JPEG artifacts & noise in dark portions of images (inherent to JPEG compression) also become as apparent. Hence, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and figure you just can't see the blocking due to your monitor.
    Finally, on a LR-unrelated note, why don't you come back to these forums when you're ready to write posts free of cheap ignorant insults?

  • Bug? Corrupt Tones / Colours - Image looks different in photoshop

    Hi,
    Am hoping somebody can help me as I must be doing something really stupid here. I'm currently evaluating various workflow products, and really like Lightroom but find that whenever I import an image into LR the tones, particular shadow tones, look way too dark. They look kinda posterised.
    My monitor is color calibrated with a spyder. I am running Windows XP.
    I've attached a link to an image to demonstrate. I took an sRGB JPEG and imported into LR. I then edited a copy in PS (exported as ProPhoto - converted in PS to Adobe 1988 colorspace), another copy is shown exported to Capture NX (also Adobe colorspace).
    http://www.hamiltonconsulting.net/strange%20tones.jpg
    if you look at the shadow tones in the folds of the jacket you can see a minor difference between PS and Capture NX but you can see a clear difference in LR. The shadows are way darker.
    The image opens fine it every other application I have tried, including the free XP viewers. LR is doing something strange to the file but I cant work out what.
    I first noticed the problem occuring in Beta 4.1 and am now getting the same issue in the new Lightroom demo ( I had hoped it was a bug that would have been fixed). I have been installing all sorts of evaluation software of late, so maybe something hasnt been cleaned out of my registry, or something is clashing.
    So far, I've tried lots of different images (all with the same problem). Recreating an image database. Reinstalling LR (countless times).
    Does anyone have any ideas as to what I can try or do I need to reinstall my entire PC :-(

    The image on the left in PS looks the same in Picasa Image
    Viewer (I selected it to be color managed based on the monitor profile), looks the same in Windows Image Viewer, and looks the same in the thumbnail.  The image on the right in LR is how the picture looks when I look at my image in Firefox but in Internet Explorer and in Chrome, the image looks like the image on the left in PS.  The image below shows how the thumbnail looks different from the actual picture when it's double clicked and viewed in Picasa.  The thumbnail (which shows the subjects having green skin) would be how I saw it online while the double clicked version is how I saw it in PS, even though it was sRGB (I checked the image properties to make sure of the color space).
    I have a ATI 5470 GPU on my ASUS 17.3 inch laptop.  Not sure about the drivers.

  • Image looks truncated in viewer and canevas

    Hi there,
    I am begining a new SD project in which I imported a QT sequence that was generated with Mpegstreamclip.
    I chose easy settings mode in FCP.
    In both viwere and canevas, the image does not look "centered".
    As a matter of fact, it is truncated on the right side and when I play the sequence, a vertically moving blueish-greenwish band appears on the right side.
    I have checked that the sequence plays all right in MPEG streamclip.
    By the way, if I import another sequence that was shot with a HD photocamera, 16:9 format, a blueish band also appears on the right side.
    What could be the problem ?
    It is the first time I see that
    Thanks in advance
    Ivan

    The image on the left in PS looks the same in Picasa Image
    Viewer (I selected it to be color managed based on the monitor profile), looks the same in Windows Image Viewer, and looks the same in the thumbnail.  The image on the right in LR is how the picture looks when I look at my image in Firefox but in Internet Explorer and in Chrome, the image looks like the image on the left in PS.  The image below shows how the thumbnail looks different from the actual picture when it's double clicked and viewed in Picasa.  The thumbnail (which shows the subjects having green skin) would be how I saw it online while the double clicked version is how I saw it in PS, even though it was sRGB (I checked the image properties to make sure of the color space).
    I have a ATI 5470 GPU on my ASUS 17.3 inch laptop.  Not sure about the drivers.

  • Why the exported JPG file looks like completely black?

    I've already exported a PDF file by Indesign, but when I exported it to JPG file (by Acrobat), the JPG looks like almost compeletely black. But When I exported it to PNG, or Open this JPG by PS, and save it again, the image looks like normal (no black). This is PDF creating problem ( by indesign) or JPG creating problem (by Acrobat)?

    Can you attach a screenshot?
    *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screenshot
    Use a compressed image type like PNG or JPG to save the screenshot and make sure that you do not exceed the maximum file size (1 MB).
    You can try to search for a theme that looks better for you or maybe a solid persona with a suitable color.
    *Themes: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/themes/
    *Personas for Firefox | Gallery: http://www.getpersonas.com/en-US/gallery/Solid

  • Image looks different in Photoshop and Lightroom

    I started a forum on flickr and I have some issues with my images.  I have  calibrated monitor but my images look off online even though I saved them as sRGB.  Now my image looks one way in PS and then when I finish editing it and save it, I import it into lightroom and it looks different.
    Same image, but it looks different.
    http://www.flickr.com/groups/photoshopsupport/discuss/72157626443796391/#comment7215762645 5942911

    The image on the left in PS looks the same in Picasa Image
    Viewer (I selected it to be color managed based on the monitor profile), looks the same in Windows Image Viewer, and looks the same in the thumbnail.  The image on the right in LR is how the picture looks when I look at my image in Firefox but in Internet Explorer and in Chrome, the image looks like the image on the left in PS.  The image below shows how the thumbnail looks different from the actual picture when it's double clicked and viewed in Picasa.  The thumbnail (which shows the subjects having green skin) would be how I saw it online while the double clicked version is how I saw it in PS, even though it was sRGB (I checked the image properties to make sure of the color space).
    I have a ATI 5470 GPU on my ASUS 17.3 inch laptop.  Not sure about the drivers.

  • My images look "choppy" in coverflow mode.

    Hey everyone,
    I recently noticed that any new designs I save are showing up "choppy" in coverflow mode. They look pixelated and they don't adjust like the other images I have in my folders. It's only happening to new files. i.e. I'll design something in Photoshop or Illustrator, save as jpeg and/or PSD/AI file, open up the folder and the image is ratty. It's so strange cause when I downloaded an image from the internet to do some more investigating, the image turns out great and it looks completely fine when I view in coverflow mode.
    I hope this all made sense. Help! I can't preview my images looking like this anymore!
    Thanks in advance!!

    this could happen if you are saving image files with custom icons. they may look bad in coverflow if they are too small. I don't use photoshop but I know it has an option to save with or without custom icons attached. choose the latter.

  • Photos look like film negatives after color correcting

    I tried following Scott Kelby's instructions for color correcting digital images in PSE 10. I was entering the values he gave for the R,G and Blue channels. I got off track and probably missed a step. Anyway, now when I try any of the auto correction features, my images look like film negatives and not like a regular digital image. How can I re-enable the auto correction features (levels, color correction, etc.) ?

    Make an levels adjustment layer and Alt (option) click on the Auto button in the levels dialog.
    Then in the Auto Color correction Options set the RGB values for
    Shadows RGB 0,0,0
    Midtones RGB 128,128,128
    Highlights RGB 255,255,255
    Then check Save as Defaults

  • HT201210 i updated my 4s yesterday, but my phone will not work at all now, and will not turn off. It has a itunes image on the screen with an arrow undernieth and what looks like the charger lead. i've had it on charge! is there anything else i can do?

    i updated my 4s yesterday, but my phone will not work at all now, and will not turn off. It has a itunes image on the screen with an arrow underneath and what looks like the charger lead. i've had it on charge! is there anything else i can do?

    Cconnect it to your computer with the latest version of iTunes installed.

Maybe you are looking for