Rewrite update query to improve performance - sql attached
Hi ,
The following query(pasted below) is taking 4 hours to compelete, table ef is having 10 crore records, and I have 3 binary indexes defined on ef on columns as_at_date, cc and fid (these are individual indexes), just want to know if there is any better way to write the query?
Many thanks
Rahul
SQL :
update ef emp
set emp.b2r = (
select e.b2r
from ef e
where e.as_at_date = (select max(as_at_date) from ef where b2r is not null)
and e.b2r is not null
and emp.fid = e.fid
and emp.cc = e.cc
where substr(emp.as_at_date,1,6) >= (select substr(max(fk_reporting_date_id),1,6) from f_c_f)
and exists (
select e.b2r
from ef e
where e.as_at_date = (select max(as_at_date) from ef where b2r is not null)
and e.b2r is not null
and emp.fid=e.fid
and emp.cc=e.cc
> which column uniquely identifies every row : UNKNOW to me(really sorry)
This is a very critical piece of information. UNKNOWN is a very wrong answer. You need to know such things before keeping your hands on keyboard.
Any way based on your update statement you can convert it into merge statement like this
merge into ef a
using (
select b2r
, fid
, cc
from (
select b2r
, fid
, cc
, row_number() over
partition by fid
, cc
order by decode(b2r, null, null, as_at_date)
desc nulls last
) rno
from ef
where rno = 1
) b
on (
a.fid = b.fid and
a.cc = b.cc and
ubstr(a.as_at_date,1,6) >= (select substr(max(fk_reporting_date_id),1,6) from f_c_f)
when matched then
update set a.b2r = b.b2r;
Note: The code is untested
This scans your EF table lesser number of time. As you are in 11g you can try using DBMS_PARALLEL_EXECUTE to speed up your SQL.
Similar Messages
-
How to improve performance of attached query
Hi,
How to improve performance of the below query, Please help. also attached explain plan -
SELECT Camp.Id,
rCam.AccountKey,
Camp.Id,
CamBilling.Cpm,
CamBilling.Cpc,
CamBilling.FlatRate,
Camp.CampaignKey,
Camp.AccountKey,
CamBilling.billoncontractedamount,
(SUM(rCam.Impressions) * 0.001 + SUM(rCam.Clickthrus)) AS GR,
rCam.AccountKey as AccountKey
FROM Campaign Camp, rCamSit rCam, CamBilling, Site xSite
WHERE Camp.AccountKey = rCam.AccountKey
AND Camp.AvCampaignKey = rCam.AvCampaignKey
AND Camp.AccountKey = CamBilling.AccountKey
AND Camp.CampaignKey = CamBilling.CampaignKey
AND rCam.AccountKey = xSite.AccountKey
AND rCam.AvSiteKey = xSite.AvSiteKey
AND rCam.RmWhen BETWEEN to_date('01-01-2009', 'DD-MM-YYYY') and
to_date('01-01-2011', 'DD-MM-YYYY')
GROUP By rCam.AccountKey,
Camp.Id,
CamBilling.Cpm,
CamBilling.Cpc,
CamBilling.FlatRate,
Camp.CampaignKey,
Camp.AccountKey,
CamBilling.billoncontractedamount
Explain Plan :-
Description Object_owner Object_name Cost Cardinality Bytes
SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = ALL_ROWS 14 1 13
SORT AGGREGATE 1 13
VIEW GEMINI_REPORTING 14 1 13
HASH GROUP BY 14 1 103
NESTED LOOPS 13 1 103
HASH JOIN 12 1 85
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GEMINI_REPORTING RCAMSIT 2 4 100
NESTED LOOPS 9 5 325
HASH JOIN 7 1 40
SORT UNIQUE 2 1 18
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GEMINI_PRIMARY SITE 2 1 18
INDEX RANGE SCAN GEMINI_PRIMARY SITE_I0 1 1
TABLE ACCESS FULL GEMINI_PRIMARY SITE 3 27 594
INDEX RANGE SCAN GEMINI_REPORTING RCAMSIT_I 1 1 5
TABLE ACCESS FULL GEMINI_PRIMARY CAMPAIGN 3 127 2540
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GEMINI_PRIMARY CAMBILLING 1 1 18
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GEMINI_PRIMARY CAMBILLING_U1 0 1duplicate thread..
How to improve performance of attached query -
Rewrite SQL query to improve performance
Hello,
The below queries are very time consuming.Could you please suggest how to improve performance for these 2 queries:
QUERY1:
SELECT avbeln aposnr aauart avkorg avtweg aspart
avkbur akunnr bmatnr bkwmeng b~vrkme
bnetwr bwerks blgort bvstel babgru berdat b~ernam
cfaksk cktext cvdatu czzbrsch ckvgr1 caugru
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE g_t_sodata
FROM vapma AS a INNER JOIN vbap AS b ON
avbeln = bvbeln AND aposnr = bposnr
INNER JOIN vbak AS c ON avbeln = cvbeln
WHERE a~vkorg IN so_vkorg
AND a~vtweg IN so_vtweg
AND a~vkbur IN so_vkbur
AND a~auart IN so_auart
AND a~vbeln IN so_vbeln
AND b~abgru IN so_abgru
AND c~faksk IN so_faksk
AND ( b~erdat GT g_f_zenkai_date OR
( berdat EQ g_f_zenkai_date AND berzet GE g_f_zenkai_time ) )
AND ( b~erdat LT g_f_kaisi_date OR
( berdat EQ g_f_kaisi_date AND berzet LT g_f_kaisi_time ) ).
QUERY2:
SELECT avbeln aposnr aauart avkorg avtweg aspart
avkbur akunnr bmatnr bkwmeng b~vrkme
b~netwr
bwerks blgort bvstel babgru berdat bernam
cfaksk cktext cvdatu czzbrsch ckvgr1 caugru
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE g_t_sodata
FROM vapma AS a INNER JOIN vbap AS b ON
avbeln = bvbeln AND aposnr = bposnr
INNER JOIN vbak AS c ON avbeln = cvbeln
WHERE a~vkorg IN so_vkorg
AND a~vtweg IN so_vtweg
AND a~vkbur IN so_vkbur
AND a~auart IN so_auart
AND a~vbeln IN so_vbeln
AND b~abgru IN so_abgru
AND c~faksk IN so_faksk.Questions like this a one of the favorites here in this forum.
I guess that the statements are o.k.
The problem is the usage! There are so many Ranges, if they are filled then some index should support it. If no range is filled then it is usually slow, you can not do anything.
You must find out, which are actually used and under which conditions it is slow and when it is o.k.
Ask again, when you can provide the actual cases.
Use SQL trace to check the performance:
SQL trace:
The SQL Trace (ST05) Quick and Easy
I know the probabilty is high, that you will ignore this recommendation and you will points to the
'Use FOR ALL ENTRIES' recommendations' ... but then I can not help you.
Siegfried -
How can we rewrite this query for better performance
Hi All,
The below query is taking more time to run. Any ideas how to improve the performance by rewriting the query using NOT EXITS or any other way...
Help Appreciated.
/* Formatted on 2012/04/25 18:00 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
SELECT vendor_id
FROM po_vendors
WHERE end_date_active IS NULL
AND enabled_flag = 'Y'
and vendor_id NOT IN ( /* Formatted on 2012/04/25 18:25 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
SELECT vendor_id
FROM po_headers_all
WHERE TO_DATE (creation_date) BETWEEN TO_DATE (SYSDATE - 365)
AND TO_DATE (SYSDATE))
ThanksTry this one :
This will help you for partial fetching of data
SELECT /*+ first_rows(50) no_cpu_costing */
vendor_id
FROM po_vendors
WHERE end_date_active IS NULL
AND enabled_flag = 'Y'
AND vendor_id NOT IN (
SELECT vendor_id
FROM po_headers_all
WHERE TO_DATE (creation_date) BETWEEN TO_DATE (SYSDATE - 365)
AND TO_DATE (SYSDATE))
overall your query is also fine, because, the in this query the subquery always contain less data compare to main query. -
Improve performance SQL using better SQL functions
Good afternoon,
I am trying to improve the performance of a SQL query, embedded within a Pro*C environment.
The query is the following:
SELECT ri FROM
TRANSLAT WHERE (:ora9_ogt_prfx LIKE (TRANSLAT.OGT_PRFX||'%')) AND
(:ora9_in_prfx LIKE (TRANSLAT.IN_PRFX||'%')) AND
(LENGTH(:ora9_in_prfx) = ASCII(TRANSLAT.IN_LGTH))
ORDER BY LENGTH(TRANSLAT.OGT_PRFX) DESC,
LENGTH(TRANSLAT.IN_PRFX) DESC
The table format is the following:
SQL> desc translat;
Name Type
IN_LGTH CHAR(1)
IN_PRFX VARCHAR2(24)
NAME VARCHAR2(20)
OGT_PRFX VARCHAR2(24)
OUT_PRFX VARCHAR2(24)
RI NUMBER(18)
SNPUPDT NUMBER
The idea of the query is the following:
Give the information about a tupple with following conditions:
- The field "OGT_PREFIX" starts with ora9_ogt_prfx
- The field "IN_PREFIX" starts with ora9_in_prfx
- Some length variable should be ok
and order them, first following the OGT_PRFX field, and second following the IN_PRFX field.
Following a tkprof analysis, this query is parsed again everytime it is needed,
despite the usage of bind variables (all variables start with a ':' character).
Questions:
- Why is the query parsed again every time?
- Personally I think this is due to the '||' operator. Is there another way of saying that a variable should start with the value of a field in such a way that the '||' operator is not needed (does there exist a logical operator like "Begins_with" so that the conditions becomes "TRANSLAT.IN_PRFX Begins_with :ora9_in_prfx")?
- Within the query, there is always a reference towards the table itself while referencing a field. Would it make any performance difference if "TRANSLAT.OGT_PRFX" is replaced by "OGT_PRFX", "TRANSLAT.IN_PRFX" by "IN_PRFX", ...?
Thanks a lot
Dominique
P.s. if this thread is entered in the wrong discussion forum, please let me know.- Why is the query parsed again every time?Because somewhere in the code the cursor gets closed, so on a subsequent usage you have to open it again and parse again.
- Personally I think this is due to the '||'
operator. Is there another way of saying that a
variable should start with the value of a field in
such a way that the '||' operator is not needed (does
there exist a logical operator like "Begins_with" so
that the conditions becomes "TRANSLAT.IN_PRFX
Begins_with :ora9_in_prfx")?I think that you don't know a reason for the seen behaviour and you are guessing here.
Please post the tkprof output here so we can examine what is the root cause for your performance problem. And by the way, what is the response time and what is acceptable?
- Within the query, there is always a reference
towards the table itself while referencing a field.
Would it make any performance difference if
"TRANSLAT.OGT_PRFX" is replaced by "OGT_PRFX",
"TRANSLAT.IN_PRFX" by "IN_PRFX", ...?No, in fact the use of aliases or even table names is considered a good practice, especially when more tables are involved, and in this case of only one table it doesn't really matter.
Regards,
Rob. -
How to improve performance of the attached query
Hi,
How to improve performance of the below query, Please help. also attached explain plan -
SELECT Camp.Id,
rCam.AccountKey,
Camp.Id,
CamBilling.Cpm,
CamBilling.Cpc,
CamBilling.FlatRate,
Camp.CampaignKey,
Camp.AccountKey,
CamBilling.billoncontractedamount,
(SUM(rCam.Impressions) * 0.001 + SUM(rCam.Clickthrus)) AS GR,
rCam.AccountKey as AccountKey
FROM Campaign Camp, rCamSit rCam, CamBilling, Site xSite
WHERE Camp.AccountKey = rCam.AccountKey
AND Camp.AvCampaignKey = rCam.AvCampaignKey
AND Camp.AccountKey = CamBilling.AccountKey
AND Camp.CampaignKey = CamBilling.CampaignKey
AND rCam.AccountKey = xSite.AccountKey
AND rCam.AvSiteKey = xSite.AvSiteKey
AND rCam.RmWhen BETWEEN to_date('01-01-2009', 'DD-MM-YYYY') and
to_date('01-01-2011', 'DD-MM-YYYY')
GROUP By rCam.AccountKey,
Camp.Id,
CamBilling.Cpm,
CamBilling.Cpc,
CamBilling.FlatRate,
Camp.CampaignKey,
Camp.AccountKey,
CamBilling.billoncontractedamount
Explain Plan :-
Description Object_owner Object_name Cost Cardinality Bytes
SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = ALL_ROWS 14 1 13
SORT AGGREGATE 1 13
VIEW GEMINI_REPORTING 14 1 13
HASH GROUP BY 14 1 103
NESTED LOOPS 13 1 103
HASH JOIN 12 1 85
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GEMINI_REPORTING RCAMSIT 2 4 100
NESTED LOOPS 9 5 325
HASH JOIN 7 1 40
SORT UNIQUE 2 1 18
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GEMINI_PRIMARY SITE 2 1 18
INDEX RANGE SCAN GEMINI_PRIMARY SITE_I0 1 1
TABLE ACCESS FULL GEMINI_PRIMARY SITE 3 27 594
INDEX RANGE SCAN GEMINI_REPORTING RCAMSIT_I 1 1 5
TABLE ACCESS FULL GEMINI_PRIMARY CAMPAIGN 3 127 2540
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GEMINI_PRIMARY CAMBILLING 1 1 18
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GEMINI_PRIMARY CAMBILLING_U1 0 1duplicate thread..
How to improve performance of attached query -
Please help to modifiy this query for better performance
Please help to rewrite this query for better performance. This is taking long time to execute.
Table t_t_bil_bil_cycle_change contains 1200000 rows and table t_acctnumberTab countains 200000 rows.
I have created index on ACCOUNT_ID
Query is shown below
update rbabu.t_t_bil_bil_cycle_change a
set account_number =
( select distinct b.account_number
from rbabu.t_acctnumberTab b
where a.account_id = b.account_id
Table structure is shown below
SQL> DESC t_acctnumberTab;
Name Type Nullable Default Comments
ACCOUNT_ID NUMBER(10)
ACCOUNT_NUMBER VARCHAR2(24)
SQL> DESC t_t_bil_bil_cycle_change;
Name Type Nullable Default Comments
ACCOUNT_ID NUMBER(10)
ACCOUNT_NUMBER VARCHAR2(24) YIshan's solution is good. I would avoid updating rows which already have the right value - it's a waste of time.
You should have a UNIQUE or PRIMARY KEY constraint on t_acctnumberTab.account_id
merge rbabu.t_t_bil_bil_cycle_change a
using
( select distinct account_number, account_id
from rbabu.t_acctnumberTab
) t
on ( a.account_id = b.account_id
and decode(a.account_number, b.account_number, 0, 1) = 1
when matched then
update set a.account_number = b.account_number -
Improving performance while adding groups
Hello,
I've been monitoring my crystal reports from a week or so and the report performance is going for a toss. I would like to narrate this in little detail. I have created 3 groups to select dynamic parameters and each group has a formula for itself. In my parameters I have added one parameter with 7 entities (which is hard coded), now a user can select any 3 entity out of those seven when initiallly refreshing the document, each of the parameter entity is bundeled in a conditional formula (mentioned under formula fields) for each entity. The user may select any entity and may get the respective data for that entity.
For all this i have created 3 groups and same formula is pasted under all the 3 groups. I have then made the formula group to be selected under Group expert. The report works fine and yields me correct data. However, during the grouping of the formula's crystal selects all the database tables from the database field as these tables are mentioned under the group formula. Agreed all fine.
But when I run the report the "Show SQL query" selects all the database tables under Select clause which should not be the case. Due to this even if i have selected an entity which has got only 48 to 50 records, crystal tends to select all the 16,56,053 records from the database fields which is hampering the crystal performance big time. When I run the same query in SQL it retrives the data in just 8 seconds but as crystal selecting all the records gives me data after 90 seconds which is frustrating for the user.
Please suggest me a workaround for this. Please help.
Thank you.Hi,
I suspect the problem isn't necessarily just your grouping but with your Record Selection Formula as well. If you do not see a complete Where clause is because your Record Selection Formula is too complicated for Crystal to translate to SQL.
The same would be said for your grouping. There are two suggestions I can offer:
1) Instead of linking the tables in Crystal, use a SQL Command and generate your query in SQL directly. You can use parameters and at the very least, get a working WHERE clause.
2) Create a Stored Procedure or view that can use the logic you need to retrieve the records.
At the very least you want to be able to streamline the query to improve performance. Grouping may not be possible but my guess it's more with the Selection formula than the grouping.
Good luck,
Brian -
How to improve performance of MediaPlayer?
I tried to use the MediaPlayer with a On2 VP6 flv movie.
Showing a video with a resolution of 1024x768 works.
Showing a video with a resolution of 1280x720 and a average bitrate of 1700 kb/s leads to a delay of the video signal behind the audio signal of a couple of seconds. VLC, Media Player Classic and a couple of other players have no problem with the video. Only the FX MediaPlayer shows a poor performance.
Additionally mouse events in a second stage (the first stage is used for the video) are not processed in 2 of 3 cases. If the MediaPlayer is switched off, the mouse events work reliable.
Does somebody know a solution for this problems?
Cheers
masimduplicate thread..
How to improve performance of attached query -
How to improve performance of Siebel Configurator
Hi All,
We are using Siebel Configurator to model the item structures. We wrote few constraint rules on that. But while launching the configurator it is taking more time to open.
Even without rules also it is behaving in the same manner.
Any inputs on this could be highly appreciated
RAMduplicate thread..
How to improve performance of attached query -
Performance of update query for single column vs multiple column
Hi All,
I could not find any answer for this, does it ever matter in terms of performance updating single column versus multiple column in a single update query.
For eg. table consisting of 15 columns, what would be the difference in performance when one column is update in the single query against another update query where 15 columns are updated.
Please do keep in mind my table columns in actually could be around 150+.
Thanks for any information provided.If updated columns aren´t on where clause , then the only impact of 15 columns will be a increase on redo generation, and a possible chainning row.
So since the redo is one of the things that have a large impact, the answer is yes.
The performance will be slower.
Regards
Helio Dias.
http://heliodias.com
OCE SQL, OCP 9i -
Improving performance of query with View
Hi ,
I'm working on a stored procedure where certain records have to be eleminated , unfortunately tables involved in this exception query are present in a different database which will lead to performance issue. Is there any way in SQL Server to store this query
in a view and store it's execution plan and make it work like sp.While I beleive it's kinda crazy thought but is there any better way to improve performance of query when accessed across databases.
Thanks,
Vishal.Do not try to solve problems that you have not yet confirmed to exist. There is no general reason why a query (regardless of whether it involves a view) that refers to a table in a different database (NB - DATABASE not INSTANCE) will perform poorly.
As a suggestion, write a working query using a duplicate of the table in the current database. Once it is working, then worry about performance. Once that is working as efficiently as it can , change the query to use the "remote" table rather
than the duplicate. Then determine if you have an issue. If you cannot get the level of performance you desire with a local table, then you most likely have a much larger issue to address. In that case, perhaps you need to change your perspective
and approach to accomplishing your goal. -
Improving Performance of Dynamic SQL in Pro*C
I am using Dynamic sql format 3 in pro*C,
i.e prepare sqlstmt from :sql_stmt
declare cursor c1 for sqlstmt
But the query is slow .I am also using
order by with ltrim(rtrim(colname))
& sometimes group by .
can anyone tell how to improve performance
of cursors in dynamic sql,or how can
I use the same in Pl/sql with simultaneous
printing of the rows returned,on a file.
nullManoj,
Typically, the slow performance is due to the SQL statement itself rather than the dynamic SQL execution code in Pro*C.
Check your explain plan to see if the query performs well. I suspect that you will find your problem here. -
We have an update query recently brought to my attention that is running extremely slow on Oracle 11.2.0.1 against a secure file binary XML table using
update /*+ NO_XML_DML_REWRITE */croutreach.action set object_value = :1 where actn_id = :2 .
I am told the majority/near majority of the ~ 16 fields are updated. Also this table has numerous predefined virtual columns with fn based indexes on them.
My first inclination was to recast this using the Oracle updatexml function. I was told, the /*+ NO_XML_DML_REWRITE */ hint would also be necessary here.
update /*+ NO_XML_DML_REWRITE */
<tble_name> a
set a.object_value = updatexml(a.object_value ...).
Last year our dba's were instructed by Oracle Support to use this hint, as the update wasn't updating any records w.o any error msgs.
+1. Hoping to find out if anyone has run across using this hint in some capacity and what was their experience?+
In trying to optimizie this update statement, I'll start from scratch not using the /*+ NO_XML_DML_REWRITE */ hint and will commence with using the updatexml function with setting up an xmlindex.
+2. Hoping to receive some suggestions on creating the proper xmlindex - figuring an unstructured index. If get some good performance with the xmlindex; hoping to retire some of the virtual column usage.+
+3. Any suggestions on living with virtual columns in conjunction with xmlindexes? See the action table definition and associated ivirtual columns and indexes. This table seems over indexed...+
REATE
TABLE "CROUTREACH"."ACTION" OF XMLTYPE
CONSTRAINT "ACTN_ID_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("ACTN_ID") USING INDEX PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS STORAGE(INITIAL 65536 NEXT
1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1
FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE
DEFAULT) TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" ENABLE
XMLTYPE STORE AS SECUREFILE BINARY XML
TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" ENABLE STORAGE IN ROW CHUNK 8192 CACHE READS LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS KEEP_DUPLICATES STORAGE(INITIAL 106496 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT)
ALLOW NONSCHEMA ALLOW ANYSCHEMA VIRTUAL COLUMNS
*"ACTION_DEF_URN"* AS (CAST(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03"; (::)
/action/srvContextPointer/outreachActionDefInfo/@actionDefUrn
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2) AS VARCHAR2(50))),
*"STAT_DT"* AS (SYS_EXTRACT_UTC(CAST(TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(
SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03"; (::)
/action/@status_dt'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2),'SYYYY-MM-DD"T"HH24:MI:SS.FFTZH:TZM') AS TIMESTAMP
WITH
TIME ZONE))),
*"ACT_DEF_ID"* AS (CAST(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03"; (::)
/action/srvContextPointer/outreachActionDefInfo/@actionDefId'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2) AS VARCHAR2(20))),
*"CORRL_ID"* AS (CAST(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03"; (::)
/action/correlationId'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2) AS VARCHAR2(50))),
*"STAT_RSN"* AS (CAST(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03"; (::)
/action/statusReason'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2) AS VARCHAR2(30))),
*"ACT_APPNT_DT"* AS (SYS_EXTRACT_UTC(CAST(TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(
SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03"; (::)
/action/actionAppointment/appointment_dt'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2),'SYYYY-MM-DD"T"HH24:MI:SS.FFTZH:TZM') AS TIMESTAMP
WITH
TIME ZONE))),
*"UPDT_DT"* AS (SYS_EXTRACT_UTC(CAST(TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(
SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03"; (::)
/action/@update_dt'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2),'SYYYY-MM-DD"T"HH24:MI:SS.FFTZH:TZM') AS TIMESTAMP
WITH
TIME ZONE))),
*"CRET_DT"* AS (SYS_EXTRACT_UTC(CAST(TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(
SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03"; (::)
/action/@create_dt'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2),'SYYYY-MM-DD"T"HH24:MI:SS.FFTZH:TZM') AS TIMESTAMP
WITH
TIME ZONE))),
*"ACT_SEQ"* AS (CAST(TO_NUMBER(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03"; (::)
/action/srvContextPointer/outreachActionDefInfo/@sequence'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2)) AS NUMBER(10))),
*"SERVICE_DEF_URN"* AS (CAST(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03";
/action/srvContextPointer/serviceDefUrn'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2) AS VARCHAR2(100))),
*"ASSIGN_TEAM_CD"* AS (CAST(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03"; (::)
/action/assignment/@teamCategoryCode'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2) AS VARCHAR2(50))),
*"ASSIGN_STAFF_ID"* AS (CAST(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03"; (::)
/action/assignment/staffProfileId'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2) AS VARCHAR2(50))),
*"ACTION_TYPE"* AS (CAST(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03"; (::)
declare namespace xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; (::)
local-name-from-QName(QName("http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03",/action/@xsi:type))
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2) AS VARCHAR2(50))),
*"ACTN_ID"* AS (CAST(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03";/action/@id'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2) AS VARCHAR2(50))),
*"STATUS"*AS (CAST(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03";/action/@status'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2) AS VARCHAR2(20))),
*"ACME_MBR_ID"* AS (CAST(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(SYS_XQEXVAL(XMLQUERY(
'declare default element namespace "http://www.cigna.com/acme/domains/actions/2010/03";/action/acmeMemberId'
PASSING BY VALUE SYS_MAKEXML(128,"XMLDATA") RETURNING CONTENT ),0,0,
16777216,0),50,1,2) AS VARCHAR2(50)))
PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 NOCOMPRESS LOGGING STORAGE
INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0
FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" ;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX *"CROUTREACH"."SYS_C0014547"* ON "CROUTREACH"."ACTION"
"SYS_NC_OID$"
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS STORAGE
INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0
FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" ;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX *"CROUTREACH"."SYS_IL0000082156C00003$$"* ON "CROUTREACH".
"ACTION"
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE(INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576
MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST
GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT)
TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" PARALLEL (DEGREE 0 INSTANCES 0) ;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX *"CROUTREACH"."ACTN_ID_PK"* ON "CROUTREACH"."ACTION" (
"ACTN_ID") PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS STORAGE(
INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0
FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT) TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" ;
CREATE
INDEX *"CROUTREACH"."ACTION_STAT_RSN_IDX"* ON "CROUTREACH"."ACTION"
"STAT_RSN"
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS STORAGE
INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE
0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" ;
CREATE
INDEX *"CROUTREACH"."ACTION_UPDT_DT_IDX"* ON "CROUTREACH"."ACTION"
"UPDT_DT"
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS STORAGE
INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE
0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" ;
CREATE
INDEX *"CROUTREACH"."ACTION_CRET_DT_IDX"* ON "CROUTREACH"."ACTION"
"CRET_DT"
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS STORAGE
INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE
0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" ;
CREATE
INDEX *"CROUTREACH"."ACTION_STAT_DT_IDX"* ON "CROUTREACH"."ACTION"
"STAT_DT"
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS STORAGE
INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE
0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" ;
CREATE
INDEX *"CROUTREACH"."ACTION_MBRID_TYP_STAT_IDX"* ON "CROUTREACH"."ACTION"
"ACME_MBR_ID",
"ACTION_TYPE",
"STATUS"
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS STORAGE
INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE
0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" ;
CREATE
INDEX *"CROUTREACH"."ACT_ACTDEF_URN_IDX"* ON "CROUTREACH"."ACTION"
"ACTION_DEF_URN"
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS STORAGE
INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE
0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" ;
CREATE
INDEX *"CROUTREACH"."ACTION_ACT_DEF_ID_STATUS_IDX"* ON "CROUTREACH"."ACTION"
"ACT_DEF_ID",
"STATUS"
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS STORAGE
INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE
0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT
TABLESPACE "ACME_DATA" ;Any suggestions much appreciated.
Regards,
Richard Blanchardodie 63
update /*+ NO_XML_DML_REWRITE */croutreach.action set object_value = :1 where actn_id = :2 .
This update pattern is used in the production environment and is slowing the environment down as more xml content is increased. In a new release build, this update pattern against the action table described earlier, is particularly problematic.
Have some more information on the /*+ NO_XML_DML_REWRITE */ hint. It turns out, last year, updates statements would intermittently fail to correctly update silently failing. An Oracle Service Request was created. Over the span of about 5 mnths, Oracle determined a very low level Oracle kernel bug was the culprit. Oracle As a result of this SR, Oracle SUpport created BUG 11939507 <ORA-08102: index key not found during update on xmltable with a virtual column>. This bug is viewable on metalink. Oracle claims this bug has only been oberved on In the interim to 11.2.0.3, Oracle Support mentioned to use /*+ NO_XML_DML_REWRITE */; thus disabling piecewise update.
Here's preface information on this bug:
Bug 11939507: ORA-08102: INDEX KEY NOT FOUND DURING UPDATE ON XMLTABLE WITH VIRTUAL COLUMN
Bug Attributes
Type B - Defect Fixed in Product Version 12.1
Severity 2 - Severe Loss of Service Product Version 11.2.0.1
Status 80 - Development to Q/A Platform 23 - Oracle Solaris on SPARC (64-bit)
Created 30-Mar-2011 Platform Version 10
Updated 13-Feb-2012 Base Bug -
Database Version 11.2.0.1
Affects Platforms Generic
Product Source Oracle
Hdr: 11939507 11.2.0.1 XDB 11.2.0.1 BINARY PRODID-5 PORTID-23
Abstract: ORA-8102: INDEX KEY NOT FOUND DURING UPDATE ON XMLTABLE WITH VIRTUAL COLUMN*** 03/30/11 12:22 pm ***
BUG TYPE CHOSEN =============== code
Component: XML Database =======================
DETAILED PROBLEM DESCRIPTION ============================
The issue happens intermittently when running a batch program with 50 concurrent sessions that involves high concurrent updates.
DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS =================== reproducible testcase on customer dummy data reproduced by Thomas.
WORKAROUND? =========== No
TECHNICAL IMPACT ================ Customer is experiencing this error which is critical to the application because it causes a home health care provider to possibly lose a couple hours worth of work and have to start from scratch. The condition has only accessed concurrently from about 40 threads
RELATED ISSUES (bugs, forums, RFAs) =================================== Bug 8514561 - ORA-8102 WHEN UPDATING TABLE
HOW OFTEN DOES THE ISSUE REPRODUCE AT CUSTOMER SITE? ==================================================== Intermittent
DOES THE ISSUE REPRODUCE INTERNALLY? ==================================== Intermittent
IS A TESTCASE AVAILABLE? ======================== Yes The good news is, this bug is corrupting a virtual index column.
I'll try test cases using the update pattern; 'update /*+ NO_XML_DML_REWRITE */croutreach.action set object_value = :1 where actn_id = :2 ' - substituting actual values for the bind variables and removing interfering virtual columns. Wil lcompare with and w/o the hint.
This wil address your; "Where does the new values come from? Individual variables?" - and provide sample data.
Presently, this update pattern is used 'blindly' in that when no xml relevent changes are identified, only a couple of the roughly 16 fields are updated - yet the whole document gets updated with this update pattern. When changes occur, the whole document is updated. Will work with updating 1 or 2 fields using updatexml and try the xmlexists function for the predicate.
04/25/12 Update:
odie 63,
Here's a sample xml record from the action securefile binary xml table:
<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8' standalone = 'yes'?><action xsi:type="AssessmentActionType" status_dt="2012-01-18T19:38:21.077Z" status="not applicable" create_dt="2012-01-17T23:10:16.173Z" id="dfdfdfdfdfddfdfdfdfdfdf" xmlns:ns5="http://www.xxxxx.ddd/exception/definition/schema/2010/01" xmlns="http://www.xxxxxx.ddd/mmm/domains/actions/2010/03" xmlns:ns6="http://www.xxxxx.ddd/mmm/domains/utility/outcome/2010/03" xmlns:ns7="http://www.xxxxxx.ddd/mmm/domains/common/2010/03" xmlns:ns2="http://www.xxxxx.ddd/mmm/messages/actions/2010/03" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ns3="http://www.xxxxx.ddd/mmm/domains/workforce/2010/03" xmlns:ns4="http://www.xxxxxx.ddd/mmm/domains/entitlement/2011/11">
<acmeMemberId>abcdefghijklmnop</acmeMemberId>
<advocacyPlanId>qrstuvwxyz</advocacyPlanId>
<srvContextPointer>
<serviceDefUrn>urn:coderunner:Medical:Definition:ServiceService:11111:7</serviceDefUrn>
<outreachActionDefInfo sequence="1" actionDefUrn="urn:xxxxxxxxxx:Medical:Definition:Action:50813:2" actionDefId="xxxxxx">
<srvContextPath>Access Profile~Why did you access the profile?~Reason for access?</srvContextPath>
</outreachActionDefInfo>
</srvContextPointer>
</action>Started out using this update statement against the virtual column a.actn_id. This column is also indexed as a fbi.
UPDATE /*+ NO_XML_DML_REWRITE */ action A
SET A.object_value = updatexml(A.object_value,'/action/@status','triggered','xmlns="http://www.xxxx.vvv/yyy/domains/actions/2010/03"')
where a.actn_id='888a80be-d69f-464d-b3f7-85b6209f918e';
This statment updates fine with and w/o the hint. This hint takes away the piecewise update of the xml document and relies upon the a.actn_id virtual column.
Then removed the reliance on the virtual column using the xmlexists fn.
First did an alter index 'actn_id_pk invisible' to take the virtual column out of consideration by the optimizer.
UPDATE /*+ NO_XML_DML_REWRITE */ action A
SET A.object_value = updatexml(A.object_value,'/action/@status','triggered','xmlns="http://www.xxxx.vvv/yyy/domains/actions/2010/03"')
where xmlexists('$p/action[@id="'888a80be-d69f-464d-b3f7-85b6209f918e'"]' PASSING object_value as "p");
This update runs but doesn't update any columns - with or without the hint.
Also created a basic unstructured xmlindex to remove the full table scan - which worked fine execution plan-wise.
create index action_xmlindex_ix on action (object_value) indextype is xdb.xmlindex;Per the SR on this, the /*+ NO_XML_DML_REWRITE */ disables piecewise update and is a workaround for the bug surrounding virtual column index usage when having many concurrent sessions and updates against a table with millions of xml documents. Getting rid of the virtual column in the predicate removes the need for the workaround hint.
My problem is This update runs but doesn't update any columns. Maybe am missing something or doing a syntax/semantic error ?
Any assistance much appreciated...
Regards,
Rick Blanchard
Edited by: RickBlanchardSRSCigna on Apr 25, 2012 12:52 PM -
Help to rewrite the query --performance issue
Hi ,
Please help to rewrite the query since it's performance is not good.Especially second inline query(CASE statements are therein select caluse ..)is taking more cost.
Database Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0 - 64bi
SELECT *
FROM
(SELECT q.*,
COUNT(*) OVER() AS record_count,
ROWNUM AS row_num
FROM
(SELECT ExName.examiner_code,
examiner_name,
:v_year,
:v_month,
count_fb,
NVL(count_entered_fb, 0) count_entered_fb,
NVL(count_sent_fb, 0) count_sent_fb,
NVL(count_edited_fb, 0) count_edited_fb,
NVL(count_complete_fb, 0) count_complete_fb,
NVL(count_withibcardiff_fb, 0) count_withibcardiff_fb
FROM
(SELECT examiner_code,
COUNT(*) AS count_fb
FROM
(SELECT
examiner_code,
paper_code,
assessment_school
FROM
( SELECT DISTINCT ce.examiner_code,
ce.paper_code,
ce.assessment_school
FROM
(SELECT
DISTINCT assessment_school,
paper_code,
examiner_code
FROM candidate_examiner_allocation cea
WHERE cea.element = 'Moderation of IA'
AND cea.year = :v_year
AND cea.month = :v_month
) ce,
subject_group sg,
subject_component sc
WHERE (:v_padded_examiner_code IS NULL
OR ce.examiner_code = :v_padded_examiner_code)
AND (:v_subject_group IS NULL
OR sg.group_number = :v_subject_group)
AND sg.year = :v_year
AND sg.month = :v_month
AND sc.year = :v_year
AND sc.month = :v_month
AND sc.paper_code = ce.paper_code
AND sc.subject = sg.subject
AND sc.lvl = sg.lvl
AND (:v_subject IS NULL
OR sc.subject = :v_subject)
AND (:v_lvl IS NULL
OR sc.lvl = :v_lvl)
) ea
GROUP BY examiner_code
) ExName,
(SELECT examiner_code,
COUNT(
CASE
WHEN UPPER(wfi.status) = 'ENTERED'
THEN 1
ELSE NULL
END) AS count_entered_fb,
COUNT(
CASE
WHEN UPPER(wfi.status) = 'SENT'
THEN 1
ELSE NULL
END) AS count_sent_fb,
COUNT(
CASE
WHEN UPPER(wfi.status) = 'EDITED'
THEN 1
ELSE NULL
END) AS count_edited_fb,
COUNT(
CASE
WHEN UPPER(wfi.status) = 'COMPLETE'
THEN 1
ELSE NULL
END) AS count_complete_fb,
COUNT(
CASE
WHEN UPPER(wfi.status) = 'WITH IBCARDIFF'
THEN 1
ELSE NULL
END) AS count_withibcardiff_fb
FROM ia_instances ia1,
workflow_instance wfi
WHERE wfi.instance_id = ia1.workflow_instance_id
AND ia1.year = :v_year
AND ia1.month = :v_month
GROUP BY ia1.year,
ia1.month,
examiner_code
) iaF,
(SELECT person_code,
title
|| ' '
|| firstname
|| ' '
|| lastname AS examiner_name
FROM person
WHERE :v_examiner_name IS NULL
OR UPPER(title
|| ' '
|| firstname
|| ' '
|| lastname) LIKE :v_search_examiner_name
) P
WHERE ExName.examiner_code = iaF.examiner_code (+)
AND ExName.examiner_code = p.person_code
ORDER BY ExName.examiner_code
) q
) rc
WHERE row_num >= :v_start_row
AND row_num <= (:v_start_row+(:v_max_row-1));explain plan
line 1: SQLPLUS Command Skipped: set linesize 130
line 2: SQLPLUS Command Skipped: set pagesize 0
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 1581970599
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 276 | | 2187 (6)| 00:00:34 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | | |
|* 2 | VIEW | | 1 | 276 | | 2187 (6)| 00:00:34 |
| 3 | WINDOW BUFFER | | 1 | 250 | | 2187 (6)| 00:00:34 |
| 4 | COUNT | | | | | | |
| 5 | VIEW | | 1 | 250 | | 2187 (6)| 00:00:34 |
| 6 | SORT ORDER BY | | 1 | 119 | | 2187 (6)| 00:00:34 |
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 119 | | 2186 (6)| 00:00:34 |
|* 8 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 1 | 92 | | 2185 (6)| 00:00:34 |
| 9 | VIEW | | 1 | 20 | | 51 (4)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | SORT GROUP BY | | 1 | 7 | | 51 (4)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | VIEW | | 1 | 7 | | 51 (4)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 | SORT UNIQUE | | 1 | 127 | | 51 (4)| 00:00:01 |
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 127 | | 50 (2)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 68 | | 44 (3)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| SUBJECT_COMPONENT | 13 | 520 | | 40 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SUBJECT_COMPONENT_ASSESS_TYPE | 1059 | | | 9 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SUBJECT_GROUP_PK | 41 | 1148 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | CEA_AUTOMATIC_ALLOCATION_STATS | 5 | 295 | | 6 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 | VIEW | | 679 | 48888 | | 2133 (6)| 00:00:33 |
| 20 | SORT GROUP BY | | 679 | 25123 | | 2133 (6)| 00:00:33 |
|* 21 | HASH JOIN | | 52408 | 1893K| 1744K| 2126 (6)| 00:00:33 |
| 22 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | IA_INSTANCES | 52408 | 1125K| | 688 (1)| 00:00:11 |
|* 23 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IND_IA_INSTANCES | 49077 | | | 137 (2)| 00:00:03 |
| 24 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | WORKFLOW_INSTANCE | 1075K| 15M| | 960 (7)| 00:00:15 |
|* 25 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | PERSON | 1 | 27 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 26 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PERSON_PK | 1 | | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - filter(TO_NUMBER(:V_START_ROW)<=TO_NUMBER(:V_START_ROW)+(TO_NUMBER(:V_MAX_ROW)-1))
2 - filter("ROW_NUM">=TO_NUMBER(:V_START_ROW) AND "ROW_NUM"<=TO_NUMBER(:V_START_ROW)+(TO_NUMBER(:V_MAX_ROW)-1))
8 - access("EXNAME"."EXAMINER_CODE"="IAF"."EXAMINER_CODE"(+))
14 - access("SC"."SUBJECT"="SG"."SUBJECT" AND "SC"."LVL"="SG"."LVL")
15 - filter((:V_SUBJECT IS NULL OR "SC"."SUBJECT"=:V_SUBJECT) AND ("SC"."LVL"=:V_LVL OR :V_LVL IS NULL))
16 - access("SC"."YEAR"=TO_NUMBER(:V_YEAR) AND "SC"."MONTH"=:V_MONTH)
17 - access("SG"."YEAR"=TO_NUMBER(:V_YEAR) AND "SG"."MONTH"=:V_MONTH)
filter(:V_SUBJECT_GROUP IS NULL OR "SG"."GROUP_NUMBER"=TO_NUMBER(:V_SUBJECT_GROUP))
18 - access("CEA"."YEAR"=TO_NUMBER(:V_YEAR) AND "CEA"."MONTH"=:V_MONTH AND "SC"."PAPER_CODE"="PAPER_CODE" AND
"CEA"."ELEMENT"='Moderation of IA')
filter("CEA"."ELEMENT"='Moderation of IA' AND (:V_PADDED_EXAMINER_CODE IS NULL OR
"EXAMINER_CODE"=:V_PADDED_EXAMINER_CODE))
21 - access("WFI"."INSTANCE_ID"="IA1"."WORKFLOW_INSTANCE_ID")
23 - access("IA1"."YEAR"=TO_NUMBER(:V_YEAR) AND "IA1"."MONTH"=:V_MONTH)
25 - filter(:V_EXAMINER_NAME IS NULL OR UPPER("TITLE"||' '||"FIRSTNAME"||' '||"LASTNAME") LIKE :V_SEARCH_EXAMINER_NAME)
26 - access("EXNAME"."EXAMINER_CODE"="PERSON_CODE")
53 rows selectedHi,
please find the below rigjt explan paln.
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID 2ct41vyyzqyh7, child number 0
SELECT * FROM (SELECT q.*, COUNT(*) OVER() AS record_count, ROWNUM AS row_num FROM (SELECT
ExName.examiner_code, examiner_name, :v_year, :v_month, count_fb, NVL(count_entered_fb,
0) count_entered_fb, NVL(count_sent_fb, 0) count_sent_fb, NVL(count_edited_fb, 0) count_edited_fb,
NVL(count_complete_fb, 0) count_complete_fb, NVL(count_withibcardiff_fb, 0) count_withibcardiff_fb FROM
(SELECT examiner_code, COUNT(*) AS count_fb FROM (SELECT
examiner_code, paper_code, assessment_school FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT
ce.examiner_code, ce.paper_code, ce.assessment_school FROM (SELECT
DISTINCT assessment_school,
paper_code, examiner
Plan hash value: 651311258
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | | 2785 (100)| |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | | |
|* 2 | VIEW | | 4 | 1104 | | 2785 (7)| 00:00:43 |
| 3 | WINDOW BUFFER | | 4 | 1000 | | 2785 (7)| 00:00:43 |
| 4 | COUNT | | | | | | |
| 5 | VIEW | | 4 | 1000 | | 2785 (7)| 00:00:43 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 4 | 476 | | 2785 (7)| 00:00:43 |
| 7 | MERGE JOIN OUTER | | 4 | 368 | | 2781 (7)| 00:00:43 |
| 8 | VIEW | | 4 | 80 | | 72 (3)| 00:00:02 |
| 9 | SORT GROUP BY | | 4 | 28 | | 72 (3)| 00:00:02 |
| 10 | VIEW | | 4 | 28 | | 72 (3)| 00:00:02 |
| 11 | SORT UNIQUE | | 4 | 508 | | 72 (3)| 00:00:02 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | | 4 | 508 | | 71 (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 13 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 68 | | 44 (3)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| SUBJECT_COMPONENT | 13 | 520 | | 40 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SUBJECT_COMPONENT_ASSESS_TYPE | 1059 | | | 9 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SUBJECT_GROUP_PK | 41 | 1148 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | CEA_AUTOMATIC_ALLOCATION_STATS | 30 | 1770 | | 27 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | SORT JOIN | | 576 | 41472 | | 2709 (7)| 00:00:42 |
| 19 | VIEW | | 576 | 41472 | | 2708 (7)| 00:00:42 |
| 20 | SORT GROUP BY | | 576 | 21312 | | 2708 (7)| 00:00:42 |
|* 21 | HASH JOIN | | 52408 | 1893K| 1744K| 2701 (7)| 00:00:41 |
|* 22 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | IA_INSTANCES | 52408 | 1125K| | 1263 (6)| 00:00:20 |
| 23 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | WORKFLOW_INSTANCE | 1075K| 15M| | 960 (7)| 00:00:15 |
|* 24 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | PERSON | 1 | 27 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 25 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PERSON_PK | 1 | | | 0 (0)| |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - filter(TO_NUMBER(:V_START_ROW)<=TO_NUMBER(:V_START_ROW)+(TO_NUMBER(:V_MAX_ROW)-1))
2 - filter(("ROW_NUM">=TO_NUMBER(:V_START_ROW) AND "ROW_NUM"<=TO_NUMBER(:V_START_ROW)+(TO_NUMBER(:V_MAX_ROW)-1)))
13 - access("SC"."SUBJECT"="SG"."SUBJECT" AND "SC"."LVL"="SG"."LVL")
14 - filter(((:V_SUBJECT IS NULL OR "SC"."SUBJECT"=:V_SUBJECT) AND ("SC"."LVL"=:V_LVL OR :V_LVL IS NULL)))
15 - access("SC"."YEAR"=TO_NUMBER(:V_YEAR) AND "SC"."MONTH"=:V_MONTH)
16 - access("SG"."YEAR"=TO_NUMBER(:V_YEAR) AND "SG"."MONTH"=:V_MONTH)
filter((:V_SUBJECT_GROUP IS NULL OR "SG"."GROUP_NUMBER"=TO_NUMBER(:V_SUBJECT_GROUP)))
17 - access("CEA"."YEAR"=TO_NUMBER(:V_YEAR) AND "CEA"."MONTH"=:V_MONTH AND "SC"."PAPER_CODE"="PAPER_CODE" AND
"CEA"."ELEMENT"='Moderation of IA')
filter(("CEA"."ELEMENT"='Moderation of IA' AND (:V_PADDED_EXAMINER_CODE IS NULL OR
"EXAMINER_CODE"=:V_PADDED_EXAMINER_CODE)))
18 - access("EXNAME"."EXAMINER_CODE"="IAF"."EXAMINER_CODE")
filter("EXNAME"."EXAMINER_CODE"="IAF"."EXAMINER_CODE")
21 - access("WFI"."INSTANCE_ID"="IA1"."WORKFLOW_INSTANCE_ID")
22 - filter(("IA1"."MONTH"=:V_MONTH AND "IA1"."YEAR"=TO_NUMBER(:V_YEAR)))
24 - filter((:V_EXAMINER_NAME IS NULL OR UPPER("TITLE"||' '||"FIRSTNAME"||' '||"LASTNAME") LIKE :V_SEARCH_EXAMINER_NAME))
25 - access("EXNAME"."EXAMINER_CODE"="PERSON_CODE")
66 rows selected
Maybe you are looking for
-
Component is not getting displayed in process scheduler menu
Hi All, I have created a project and created/registered a component in that project. I have also added a page which is having a record definition with a record named L_RUNCNTL having two search fields, to this component and configured L_RUNCNTL as se
-
Scheduled report gets no data but returns success status
I have a large scheduled webi report which normally takes 2 hours to run against SAP BW. Sometimes, the report will complete very quickly (within 30 miunutes) and returns success, but there is no data in the report. Is this a WEBI problem or some so
-
I making a web site with 4.5 . I would like to know how to add a image as a background insted of a color background
-
How do i remove firefox it is not in my add/remove files
I think my system has been attacked,i cannot access pages that i have always accessed,when i go to these pages i am directed to mallicious sites,not the original sites,and i cannot access the real sites,no matter what i do,even if i use IE,i am eithe
-
Hi all, I am a newbie. Does Solaris 8 support sshfs?