RFC destination BW could not be created in the source system R3073

I'm creating a source system for our BW (version 7.0) dev client.I'm linking it to our R/3 4.7 QA client. From RSA1 I select create source system, I enter the system information and in the next screen I'm prompted to log on as system administrator. I'm in QA now and the system automatically crated the RFC connection. I test the connection and it runs ok. I log on to the BW client from QA and it logs on just fine. When I exit the screen I get the following message:
RFC destination BW could not be created in the source system message number R3073
Why is this happening? The connection tests just fine.
I'm using RFCREMOTE user in BW and ALEREMOTE in QA with the same password
Any ideas?
thanks

Hi,
I cannot tell you surely the settings for SCC4 now (I can't connect to my sys).
Nevertheless, create your R3QA RFCDEST manually in your BWDEV with SM59.
Create your BWDEV RFCDEST manually in your BWQA .
Perform test and authorization test within SM59 from both sys.
When creating the source system in BW the system will detect the RFC and ask you if you want to use it; accept an proceed the the rest of the procedure.
hope this helps...
Olivier.

Similar Messages

  • RFC destination BW could not be created in the source system

    Hi,
    Recently I installed  BI 7.0 on Win 2003 and try to create a SAP system in RSA1.
    I try to connect R/3 system (on UNIX) and getting RFC connection error u201CRFC user logon failed. Check the connection.u201D  & u201CRFC destination BW could not be created in the source systemu201D. However, I test the connection and it is working fine.
    Please suggest the solution.
    Regards,
    Rajesh

    Rajesh,
    Answer is very simple. I did get same kind of problem. It is very simple answer depending on your R3 version.
    Use password all capital letters. Don't include any small letter at all. unlock your user id and change password to capital letter. BW doesn't like small and capital letter mix. this bug is fixed in ECC 6.0
    <removed_by_moderator>
    *Do not ask for points
    Read the "Rules of Engagement"
    Regards
    RK
    Edited by: Juan Reyes on May 21, 2009 9:30 AM

  • An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system

    Hello Experts,
    I am trying post goods receipt in EWM system in a simple inbound delivery process. It is not getting posted back in ECC. I have my RFC connection setup properly(I assume since I was able to transfer inbound delivery to EWM in first place).It seems some setting related to Outbound queue in EWM is missing.Can anyone tell me in detail what settings are required?Is it something to do with WE20 transaction?I am not sure what settings should be done there.The error log is as below-
    An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system
    SB3CLNT011
    Message No. B1550
    Diagnosis
    An RFC destination should be specified for the logical system SB3CLNT011.
    This could not be done in this case. SB3CLNT011 is not your local logical system
    and this system is not included in the relevant Customizing tables.
    Procedure
    Check:
    RFC
    destination
    Port
    definitions
    oubound partner profile of
    message type SYNCH for this logical system
    Regards,
    Khushboo

    Hi Oritra and Suraj,
    I have checked remote connection in SM59 for both the logical system.It works fine.I understand this is more of a technical issue,but I don't have A local basis team to help me so reaching out to experts here.Can you guide me what technical settings could be checked for EWM-->ECC connection?When I execute BD82 for SB3CLNT011 it shows me green status with message "No messages have been defined for the selection conditions in the model".
    Although when I do this for EWM logical system SB3CLNT012 it shows me this with all green status-
    System SB3CLNT011 as a partner type already exists
    System SB3CLNT012 as a partner type already exists
    Port A000000018 with RFC destination SB3CLNT011 already exists
    Outbound parameters for message type SHP_IBDLV_CHANGE SHP_IBDLV_CHANGE01 already
    Outbound parameters for message type SHP_IBDLV_SAVE_REPLICA SHP_IBDLV_SAVE_REPLI
    Outbound parameters for message type SYNCH SYNCHRON already exist
    Am I missing something in WE20?
    Regards,
    Khushboo

  • COREid Federation Error: A local user session could not be created for the

    Hi,
    I installed two instances of COREid Federation in my machine. Also installed SiteMinder and LDAP. Source Domain of COREid (8101) uses LDAP as IdMBridge and Destination Domain (9101) uses SiteMinder as IdMBridge. I am trying to access the resource protected by the SiteMinder from the source domain using the URL which is constructed using the pattern given in the PDF:
    http://mymachine.domain.com:8101/shareid/saml/ObSAMLTransferService?DOMAIN=DestinationDomain&method=POST&TARGET=http://mymachine.domain.com:8887/Source/Source.html
    Assertions are generated and I can see the assertion in the Source domain and transferred to the Destination Domain.
    I get the following error in the Destination Domain Shareid Log file:
    ERROR - [http10113-Processor3] - RECEIVER: ERROR: A local user session could not be created for the assertion
    Please help me to solve this issue?
    Note: The Web agent runs on the web server instance 8887.
    SiteMinder is able to protect the resource when accessed.

    Typically that error occurs when the destinations access management system can't find the user based on the SAML attribute. Check to make sure that the attribute that you are matching on matches exactly.

  • PO could not be creating using the Enjoy-BAPI

    Hi expersts.
    I have a problem with BAPI function module BAPI_PO_CREATE1. When program will generate orders for several suppliers for one supplier "PO could not be creating using the Enjoy-BAPI" and "Purchase order item 00010 still contains faulty schedule lines" and
    "Source not included in list despite source list requirement"  messages occur. Order won't be generated.
    When I am generating order only for that supplier, everything is fine. They are generated and no messages are displayed.
    Could anyone help me ?
    Thanks, regards.
    Dan.

    Hi expersts.
    I have a problem with BAPI function module BAPI_PO_CREATE1. When program will generate orders for several suppliers for one supplier "PO could not be creating using the Enjoy-BAPI" and "Purchase order item 00010 still contains faulty schedule lines" and
    "Source not included in list despite source list requirement"  messages occur. Order won't be generated.
    When I am generating order only for that supplier, everything is fine. They are generated and no messages are displayed.
    Could anyone help me ?
    Thanks, regards.
    Dan.

  • SHAREid - A local user session could not be created for the assertion

    Problem: We have a client trying to federate to our environment using POST profile but we are getting the following error, "RECEIVER: ERROR: A local user session could not be created for the assertion".
    I verified that the user exist in the directory and I am able to execute a test successfully as that user.
    Thanks.

    There is a requirement that the client needs to send an attribute called "traveler" in the assertion. We found out that the problem occurs only when client sends a attribute in the assertion. When the assertion does not include the attribute, there is no issue. Not sure why that is the case as we have other clients sending the same attribute in the assertion.
    Here is the AttributeStatement.
    <saml:AttributeStatement xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><saml:Subject><saml:NameIdentifier Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified">XXXXXX</saml:NameIdentifier></saml:Subject><saml:Attribute AttributeName="XXXID" AttributeNamespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/claims"><saml:AttributeValue>XXXXX</saml:AttributeValue></saml:Attribute></saml:AttributeStatement>
    It does not have <saml:SubjectConfirmation> and <ConfirmationMethod> element. Can that be a problem?
    Thanks,
    Vinay
    Edited by: user504421 on Jul 9, 2009 2:17 PM

  • ORA-20100: AppDomain could not be created for the specified security level

    We recently updated our development environment to Visual Studio 2010. We have previously deployed (with success) .Net stored procedures from Visual Studio 2005 to our Oracle 10gR2 database. I am currently trying to configure a local instance (called local) of Oracle 10gR2 database to test deployment of .Net stored procedures to Oracle 10gR2 via Visual studio 2010 and ODT version 11.2.0.1.2. I have built the demo from the ode developer guide and gotten as far as deploying it but executing the stored procedures from VS 2010 or SQL*Plus produces the following error...
    ORA-20100: AppDomain could not be created for the specified security level
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_CLR", line 152
    ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.GETDEPTNO", line 7
    Here is what I have done.
    (Server)
    1. Installed oracle 10gR2 with ODE.Net
    2. Installed Oracle 10gR2 patch set 22
    3. Installed ODE upgrade from Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET with Oracle 10g Release 2 ODAC 10.2.0.2.21
    (Client)
    4. Installed Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET with Oracle 10g Release 2 ODAC 10.2.0.2.21 (In new client home).
    5. Installed patch set 22 on 10g client home.
    6. Installed Oracle 11g Release 2 ODAC 11.2.0.1.2 with Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio(in new 11g client home, only for VS 2010)
    I have made some minor changes (GAC) etc. per the following threads...
    ODE.NET 11.1.0.7.20 on 10g Database?!
    Re: Error: System.TypeInitializationException
    The database appears to be fully functional via TOAD - SQL plus etc. I can't find much on this error but it appears Oracle needs some permissions to launch an ASP.Net application that it does not have. Any help would be GREATLY appreciated, don't hesitate to ask for additional details.

    The KB article is almost what we have apart from theitalic underlined
    part
    Consider the following scenario:
    You use a domain administrator account to log on to a computer that is running Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2.
    You use the Active Directory Users and Computers Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in to connect to a domain controller.
    You open the Properties dialog box of a user account.
    The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
    You set the Remote Desktop Services Home Folderattribute to the shared folder path.
    NoteThis attribute is located on the
    Remote Desktop Services Profiletab.
    You click Apply or OK.
    In this scenario, you receive the following error message:
    The home folder could not be created because: The network name cannot be found.
    Note If you click Apply or OK again, no error message is returned. However, the setting is not saved.
    I think the important bit is
    The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
    We manually create the shares on our NAS and then just want to enter the path in the profile tab, I suppose the question is how to we stop it trying to create the shares ?

  • "The home folder could not be created because the network name cannot be found" error in AD users and computers

    Our home folders are stored on a non-windows NAS device and with Windows XP and 2003 we've always got the above error when creating or modifying users home folders, even when the shares were al ready created and being used.
    However this was never really a big issue as the error that popped up was really for information and finshed with a "we've modified the user properties anyway, please create the share manually" type message.
    Unfortunately now we are moving to windows 7 and 2008R2, this last part of the the message is missing and it won't accept the correct value. 
    This issue may be in the way that the NAS device shares the folder, as only the username that matches the folder name can access the share.  This behaviour can't be modified.
    Is there a way to get Windows 7/2008R2 AD users and computers to behave the same way that Windows XP/2003 does , i.e. don't try and create the share just set the value in the user properties  ?
    The AD is still at 2003 level and we can still use Windows XP/2003 clients to make the changes but this is a bit of a limitation.

    The KB article is almost what we have apart from theitalic underlined
    part
    Consider the following scenario:
    You use a domain administrator account to log on to a computer that is running Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2.
    You use the Active Directory Users and Computers Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in to connect to a domain controller.
    You open the Properties dialog box of a user account.
    The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
    You set the Remote Desktop Services Home Folderattribute to the shared folder path.
    NoteThis attribute is located on the
    Remote Desktop Services Profiletab.
    You click Apply or OK.
    In this scenario, you receive the following error message:
    The home folder could not be created because: The network name cannot be found.
    Note If you click Apply or OK again, no error message is returned. However, the setting is not saved.
    I think the important bit is
    The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
    We manually create the shares on our NAS and then just want to enter the path in the profile tab, I suppose the question is how to we stop it trying to create the shares ?

  • The process could not be created because the maximum number of asynchronous responses (5) has already been reached, and it will be dropped.

    Hi
    he process could not be created because the maximum number of asynchronous responses (5) has already been reached, and it will be dropped.
    Command executed:    "C:\WINDOWS\system32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe" -command "&G:\SCOM\SCOMModule\Notification\SMS.ps1 -scomalertid:'{c5a013e7-5408-468a-9b04-febab33cc56d}' -alertname:'Common Primary Database TableSpace
    Threshold Alert' -alertdesc:'TableSpace TEMP FreeSizePercent:0.4375\n' -alertstate:'Closed' -alerttime:'7/26/2014 1:55:19 PM' -Priority:'1' -Severity:'2'"
    Working Directory:    g:\SCOM\SCOMModule\Notification
    One or more workflows were affected by this.  
    Workflow name: Subscription852fbf70_40eb_450c_874d_46b631ca1352
    Instance name: Alert Notification Subscription Server
    Instance ID: {E07E3FAB-53BC-BC14-1634-5A6E949F9230}
    Management group:******
    Please help me
    Thanks

    Hi,
    the RMS is "Root Management Server". When you install first management server it becomes RMS. The RMS is relevant in SCOM 2007x management group. You can identify which server is RMS in administration console under management server view. Look for instance
    with "yes" value in "Is RMS" column.
    If you have SCOM 2012x version management group create sugested registry entrys on all management servers (MS) which executes command channel.
    This will surely solve your
    problem.
    Regards,
    Ivan

  • The sent mailbox could not be created on the mail server.

    Complete message says:
    The sent mailbox could not be created on the mail server.  The local "Sent Messages (mail)" mailbox was created instead.  Mail has changed your account's Mailbox Behaviors preferences to use the local "Sent Messages (mail)" mailbox.
    I am using a gmail account with my own domain.  Any ideas how to fix it?

    Menu: Mailbox -> User This Mailbox For
    First, select folders of your IMAP account, and map them to different common folders.

  • Error "codepage could not be determined for the receiver-system"

    Hi,
    we use the idoc-adapter to send message from mySAP ERP to PI.
    All worked fine.
    So, this morning I have changed the datatype of the messageId from "char" to "int" in mySAP ERP in the customizing menue (install param). So, no message received in SAP PI.
    When I start transction "we05" in mySAPERP" I get the following error:
    "codepage could not be determined for the receiver-system" status 02.
    I have changed the datatyp to "char" but the same probleme
    Can anybody help me please?
    Regards
    Stefan

    This error shouldn't occur unless there is some modification at the OS level codepages.
    Please check the entried in the RFC destination for connecting to the XI system. Unicode settings.
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • What is the best way to copy aperture library on to external hard drive? I am getting a message that say's "There was an error opening the database. The library could not be opened because the file system of the library's volume is unsupported".

    What is the best way to copy aperture library on to external hard drive? I am getting a message that say's "There was an error opening the database. The library could not be opened because the file system of the library's volume is unsupported". What does that mean? I am trying to drag libraries (with metadata) to external HD...wondering what the best way to do that is?

    Kirby Krieger wrote:
    Hi Shane.  Not much in the way of thoughts - - but fwiw:
    How is the drive attached?
    Can you open large files on the drive with other programs?
    Are you running any drive compression or acceleration programs (some drives arrive with these installed)?
    Can you reformat the drive and try again?
    Hi Kirby,
    I attached the UltraMax Plus with a USB cable. The UltraMax powers the cable so power is not an issue. I can open other files. Also, there is 500GB of files on the drive so I cannot re-format it. Although, I noted I could import the entire Aperture Library. However, I do not want to create a duplicate on my machine because that would be defeating the purpose of the external drive.
    Thanks,
    Shane

  • "ABC could not be saved, because the source file could not be read" error when downloading

    Almost every time I download a file, the download gets to the end and then I get this error "<filename> could not be saved, because the source file could not be read", and then the download fails.
    I checked my addons and they are not the problem. This doesn't happen when I try another Firefox profile. I tried several solutions offered in "http://kb.mozillazine.org/Unable_to_save_or_download_files" but they didn't help. It's not my antivirus.
    I hate to start another profile because I have my current one just the way I like it.
    Please help!

    You can check the file attributes of all the files in the Firefox Profile Folder to make sure that you have write permission.
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
    Create a new profile as a test to check if your current profile is causing the problems.
    See Basic Troubleshooting: Make a new profile:
    *https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Basic+Troubleshooting#w_8-make-a-new-profile
    If that new profile works then you can transfer some files from the old profile to that new profile (be careful not to copy corrupted files)
    See:
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_Firefox

  • In trying to update I received this message: Firefox 3.6.3(2).dmg.part could not be saved, because the source file could not be read.

    In trying to download an update I first received: "There were problems checking for, downloading, or installing this update. Firefox could not be updated because: No data was received (please try again)" It also gave a link to download manually. When I tried from the Firefox website I got: /Users/(deleted for privacy)/Desktop/Firefox 3.6.3(2).dmg.part could not be saved, because the source file could not be read.
    Try again later, or contact the server administrator. I tried this 3 times.
    == This happened ==
    Not sure how often
    == Mon around 11 am, central time, May 17, 2010

    I have tried downloading the file several times and get the same message: "No data received." I have no other system problems, I navigate well to other sites, but I'm unable to download this upgrade. Any suggestions?

  • IPhoto9: "library could not be opened because the file system of the library's volume is unsupported."

    Can please anyone help me with this issue.
    After upgrading from iPhoto8 to iPhoto9 my library won't open anymore. I have stored all my pictures on a NAS (Buffalo Link Station Duo). It all worked fine but since upgrading to iPhoto9 I do have the following problem:
    When opening iPhoto I receive a message that the library needs to be updated. I assume that iPhoto should just do this sort of automatically in order to upgrade to iPhoto9.However, next message I receive then is
    "The library could not be opened because the file system of the library's volume is unsupported."
    Apple support so far does not seem to be able to solve my issue. Anyone else having had the same issue and having a solution to this?
    Thanks a lot for your help.

    There is no solution.
    IPhoto needs to have the Library sitting on disk formatted Mac OS Extended (Journaled). Users with the Library sitting on disks otherwise formatted regularly report issues including, but not limited to, importing, saving edits and sharing the photos.While you have been lucky to date, many folks with a library on a NAS found that it worked for a while and then the problems started.
    Workaround: Put the Library on a Disk Image formatted Mac OS Extended (Journaled) and store that on the NAS. But the real solution is to use a properly formatted disk for the Library.
    Regards
    TD

Maybe you are looking for