Roaming wireless users... suggest devices

Hi all,
I want to design a wireless soho network with the following parameters.
I need 3 Access Points, one of them have to be ADSL modem/router.
The users want to roam between access points seamlessly.
The wireless devices will be connected on wires.
There are only a few users on the wireless (3-4).
[AP]------[DSL Router with wireless]------[AP]
What devides, products could you suggest?
I think I need WDS service for the roaming users, could I do this without WDS?
regards,
Gabor

with a PSK, the roam is fast enough that the users won't notice it.
The concern with EAP, is if each AP has to do the full 802.1x handshake, the client will notice the roam.  So, you configure WDS so that only one AP is doing the full authenticaiton, and you just get a 4-way handshake with the clients.  The same idea works with the WLC, only the WLC does the authenticaiton.
HTH,
Steve

Similar Messages

  • If anchor WLC fails, roaming wireless users get "stuck"

    I did a test in our lab where I roamed from an AP on WLC A to an AP on WLC B. My client kept its same IP address and connectivity remained. I'm running WLC 4.0.219, so the traffic at this point was not symetrical, but the connectivity was up. WLC A was the Anchor WLC.
    Then, I failed WLC A. My wireless client still had its original IP address from WLC, so I lost all connectivity. WLC B did not try to anything so that my client would get a new IP address (from WLC B) and regain connectivity.
    The only way I could get my client to work again was to go to WLC B and "Remove" the client. It looks like this forced the client to re-authenticate and get a new IP address.
    Is this the only way to get a client back on the network in this type of failure scenario?

    Did both WLC's have dynamic interfaces on the same subnet or did each WLC have interfaces on different subnets. I have tried this failure before with no issues, as long as the WLC have interfaces on the same subnet for the users.

  • Best way to set up wireless for roaming RDP user to prevent disconnects

    I am trying to resolve a wireless issue for a busy medical office I work at; it is an 11,000 sf building with many exam rooms and offices, and 20-30 wireless users. We tried placing three WAP4410N devices around the building on different channels with a shared SSID, so that users would have connectivity anywhere in the building. The medical assistants and doctors connect to their EMR software using laptops connected via RDP and we seem to have an issue with connections dropping briefly when they move throughout the building. The disruption is enough that their RDP connections often become unresponsive and they have to take time to disconnect and reconnect again. The other issue is that the laptops would jump to a stronger signal when, for instance, a nurse walked to the front of the building to get a patient and came close to a different WAP, but then when they came back to the exam area, the device would hang onto that signal as it grew very weak instead of jumping back to the closer WAP.
    We've also had issues with the a couple of the devices becoming completely unresponsive but I am hoping the firmware update will fix that. Is there a way to make this work properly with this model of router? How many devices should we need for full coverage?  If they just aren't up to this task, what should we be looking at to replace them? From what I have been able to research, what we are looking for is 'seamless roaming' and these devices don't support that. But I was told by a support tech that even the Aironet WAPs will have a few dropped packets going between APs so I would hate to upgrade yet again and still have the problem remain.
    Thanks,
    Chris

    Hi, My name is Eric Moyers. I am a Network Support Engineer in the Cisco Small Business Support Center. Thank you for using the Cisco Community Post Forums.
    The issue your describing is normal for WAP4410N's.
    Since there is not a wireless controller used with those WAPs, there is no way to control the roaming so that it is seamless. Without the controller, wireless signals actually have to drop before they can move from one signal to another.
    The only solution to get seamless roaming is to include a wireless controller into your network. The small business APs in our current inventory do not support.
    Aironets with a wireless controller is your best solution. Would just need to see what Cisco has that works within your budget.
    Thanks
    Eric Moyers    .:|:.:|:.
    Cisco Small Business US STAC Advanced Support Engineer
    CCNA, CCNA-Wireless
    866-606-1866 ext 601027
    Mon - Fri 09:00 - 18:00 (UTC - 05:00)
    *Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

  • Home Sharing not working between wireless PC's / devices and ethernet wired PC's on the same router.

    Home Sharing is not working between wireless PC's / devices and ethernet wired PC's on the same router.  I installed a new Verizon FIOS ActionTec  MI424WR GigE wireless / ethernet router, replacing the original FIOS router.  With the old router Home Sharing worked fine across and among all iOS and Windows wired and wireless devices.  With the new router Home Sharing works between and among the Wired PC's but not between the wired PC's and the Wireless connected PC's or iOS devices.  Home Sharing also works between and among the wireless connected PC's and iOS decices but not between them and the wired PC's.
    Only the router was changed.  No changes were made to any of the devices except all were updated with the latest version of iTunes 10.7.0.21 and the iSO devices were updated to iOS vrsion 6.01.  Three PC's are wired and all are running Windows 7.  There also is a Windows Home Server connected to the router by ethernet port.  It does not run iTunes but does provide WebDAV services to my iOS devices.  This works fine.  Two PC's are wireless, one running Windows 7 and one running Windows 8.  All of the PC's are connected to the same (new) router via it's ethernet ports and it's wireless access point.  Two of the wired PC's are connected via a high-speed  ethernet hup that is connected to the router (Home Sharing works fine between the two PC's on the hub and the PC on the router).  All wired and wireless devices on the router are visible and members of the router's Home/Office virtual network.
    All of the PC's are visible in the Windows network and all shared files are accessable from all PC's, both wired and wireless.
    Obviously the router seems to be the issue, something between the ethernet and the wireless access point components.  I checked the settings and found nothing that would prevent Home Sharing between the wired and wireless devices.  There is no setting that isolates the wireless network.  I have done the following:
    Read the router user manual and checked all the settings
    Rebooted the router and tested.
    Turned off the router's firewall and tested.
    Home Sharing is turned on all the devices and all use the same Apple ID.
    Restarted iTunes and tested.
    Verified iTunes is "Allowed" in each PC's firewall.
    Again, I can Home Share between the two wireless PC's but not between either of the wireless PC's and any of the wired PC's.  I can Home Share between my iPads and iPhones and either of the two wireless PC's but not with any of the wired PC's.  I can Home Share between any of the wired PC's but not between any wired PC and a wireless PC or iOS device.
    I hope someone may have had a similar problem and has a fix suggestion.  I'm stumped!  I have a;so contacked ActionTec and awaiting an answer.

    Solution from ActionTec is:
    Log into your router.
    Click the Advanced icon
    Cclick Yes
    Click on the IGMP Proxy
    Select Disable
    Click Apply

  • Wireless users are loosing the internet connection....

    Dear All, My wireless users are loosing the internet(http and https) connection many times per day. I just check the ports configuration in the switch, but The problem persist. The device is a Cisco Aironet 1130 AG. Someone have some idea???
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

    Dear All, My wireless users are loosing the internet(http and https) connection many times per day. I just check the ports configuration in the switch, but The problem persist. The device is a Cisco Aironet 1130 AG.
    You are barking the wrong tree.
    Can you please elaborate further?
    I need to determine whether the clients are loosing WIRELESS connection or loosing WAN connection.  Two different things, two different directions to choose from.  
    The easiest way to determine is this:
    Presume you have 10 clients and half the clients are associated to one WAP and the other to the other WAP.  Your description states that all 10 clients would loose internet connectivity.  Is this correct?  If this is so, then we start with your switch and your WAPs.  How are the WAPs powered?  PoE or power injector?  Can you console into the WAPs?  Can you post the output to the commands "sh version" and "sh logs"?  How about the switch?  Can you console into the switch?  Can you post the output to the commands "sh version" and "sh logs"?

  • EA6400: Problems for wireless users

    There are two router EA6400 (firmware version: 1.1.40.160989). Routers are configured in bridge mode. Routers are used for wireless devices/users. Wireless users have many problems with the quality of the connection and very high ping. Wired users don't have any problems with the quality of the connection and ping.
    What's the problem?
    Ping from user
    Spoiler (Highlight to read)
    user@pc:~$ ping yandex.ru
    PING yandex.ru (93.158.134.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=6.66 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=1110 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=112 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=338 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=463 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=10 ttl=56 time=449 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=12 ttl=56 time=390 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=13 ttl=56 time=515 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=14 ttl=56 time=744 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=17 ttl=56 time=17.5 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=19 ttl=56 time=139 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=21 ttl=56 time=388 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=22 ttl=56 time=1440 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=23 ttl=56 time=433 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=24 ttl=56 time=1580 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=25 ttl=56 time=574 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=31 ttl=56 time=783 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=35 ttl=56 time=954 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=36 ttl=56 time=5.31 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=37 ttl=56 time=1110 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=38 ttl=56 time=103 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=39 ttl=56 time=225 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=40 ttl=56 time=761 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=41 ttl=56 time=157 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=43 ttl=56 time=10.0 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=44 ttl=56 time=1241 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=45 ttl=56 time=241 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=47 ttl=56 time=1020 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=48 ttl=56 time=946 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=49 ttl=56 time=5.29 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=51 ttl=56 time=1122 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=52 ttl=56 time=122 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=54 ttl=56 time=275 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=55 ttl=56 time=500 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=56 ttl=56 time=427 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=57 ttl=56 time=554 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=60 ttl=56 time=730 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=61 ttl=56 time=1062 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=62 ttl=56 time=66.3 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=63 ttl=56 time=390 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=64 ttl=56 time=526 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=73 ttl=56 time=944 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=77 ttl=56 time=123 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=81 ttl=56 time=325 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=89 ttl=56 time=626 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=92 ttl=56 time=701 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=94 ttl=56 time=852 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=102 ttl=56 time=1043 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=103 ttl=56 time=43.3 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=104 ttl=56 time=150 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=110 ttl=56 time=828 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=114 ttl=56 time=9.44 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=115 ttl=56 time=1154 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=116 ttl=56 time=155 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=119 ttl=56 time=435 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=127 ttl=56 time=734 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=134 ttl=56 time=81.6 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=135 ttl=56 time=100 ms
    64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=137 ttl=56 time=559 ms
    ^C
    --- yandex.ru ping statistics ---
    141 packets transmitted, 59 received, 58% packet loss, time 140168ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.290/524.123/1580.880/407.470 ms, pipe 2
    user@pc:~$
    user@pc:~$ ping yandex.ruPING yandex.ru (93.158.134.11) 56(84) bytes of data.64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=6.66 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=1110 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=112 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=338 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=463 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=10 ttl=56 time=449 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=12 ttl=56 time=390 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=13 ttl=56 time=515 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=14 ttl=56 time=744 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=17 ttl=56 time=17.5 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=19 ttl=56 time=139 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=21 ttl=56 time=388 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=22 ttl=56 time=1440 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=23 ttl=56 time=433 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=24 ttl=56 time=1580 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=25 ttl=56 time=574 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=31 ttl=56 time=783 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=35 ttl=56 time=954 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=36 ttl=56 time=5.31 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=37 ttl=56 time=1110 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=38 ttl=56 time=103 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=39 ttl=56 time=225 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=40 ttl=56 time=761 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=41 ttl=56 time=157 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=43 ttl=56 time=10.0 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=44 ttl=56 time=1241 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=45 ttl=56 time=241 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=47 ttl=56 time=1020 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=48 ttl=56 time=946 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=49 ttl=56 time=5.29 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=51 ttl=56 time=1122 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=52 ttl=56 time=122 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=54 ttl=56 time=275 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=55 ttl=56 time=500 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=56 ttl=56 time=427 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=57 ttl=56 time=554 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=60 ttl=56 time=730 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=61 ttl=56 time=1062 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=62 ttl=56 time=66.3 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=63 ttl=56 time=390 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=64 ttl=56 time=526 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=73 ttl=56 time=944 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=77 ttl=56 time=123 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=81 ttl=56 time=325 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=89 ttl=56 time=626 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=92 ttl=56 time=701 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=94 ttl=56 time=852 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=102 ttl=56 time=1043 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=103 ttl=56 time=43.3 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=104 ttl=56 time=150 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=110 ttl=56 time=828 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=114 ttl=56 time=9.44 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=115 ttl=56 time=1154 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=116 ttl=56 time=155 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=119 ttl=56 time=435 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=127 ttl=56 time=734 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=134 ttl=56 time=81.6 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=135 ttl=56 time=100 ms64 bytes from yandex.ru (93.158.134.11): icmp_seq=137 ttl=56 time=559 ms^C--- yandex.ru ping statistics ---141 packets transmitted, 59 received, 58% packet loss, time 140168msrtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.290/524.123/1580.880/407.470 ms, pipe 2user@pc:~$
    Traceroute from user

    geekychix wrote:
    What is the wireless channel set for your router? Flash the firmware of your router, reset and reconfigure it. Try playing around with channels 1,3,6 or 9. Security mode should be set to WPA2 Personal. Let me know how it goes.
    Forgot to say that I only use 2GHz wireless network. A fifth channel to another 12th channel. Channels I specifically chose not to overlap with neighboring networks. I've already tried to reset the settings on the defaul and reconfigure the router again. I only use WPA2 PSK-CCMP. Have any ideas?
    Lun wrote:
    EA6400 works really good for me with the current firmware.  On 2.4ghz, channel 9 is solid and at 5.0ghz, channel 157 is strong too.  Try that.
    Forgot to say that I only use 2GHz wireless network. A fifth channel to another 12th channel. Channels I specifically chose not to overlap with neighboring networks.
    Saffronfs7 wrote:
    Your WiFi network is possibly prone to wireless interference which causes high latency and slow/intermittent connection. Adjust the wireless settings on your EA6400 routers. Use Non-overlapping Channels like 1 or 6 or 11. Use a WiFi scanner to check which Channels are crowded and which ones are not. Although 5GHz network uses non-overlapping Channels I recommend using Channel 161.
    I advance it all already made. Have any ideas?
    Lun wrote:
    Everyone in my area are using channel 1, 6, and 11 on 2.4ghz.  Channel 9 work best for me.
    Channels I specifically chose not to overlap with neighboring networks. Have any ideas?

  • Getting Wireless Users onto LAN

    Hello All,
    We currently purchased 2 AP's and a 2106 WLC and I am having some trouble getting the wireless users to communicate to the network on the other side of the WLC. Here is a very simple diagram on how this is all connected.
    3750X L3 Switch --> 2106 WLC --> AP
    LAN Network - 10.10.0.0/16           Wireless Users Network - 10.100.21.0/24
    So with a laptop, I can get a DHCP reservation from the WLC to the 10.100.21.0/24 network. From there though, I cannot ping anything in the 10.10.0.0/16 network. I know that I am talking across two different networks so by default they shouldnt be able to communicate, but I feel like I am missing a setting on the WLC that will allow the two networks to communicate.
    Management Interface:
    IP Address: 10.10.20.100
    Netmask: 255.255.0.0
    Gateway: 10.10.0.1
    DHCP Info: 10.10.20.100
    Here is the config for my test interface (which may be the problem):
    IP Address: 10.100.21.2
    Netmask: 255.255.255.0
    Gateway: 10.100.21.1
    DHCP Info: 10.10.20.100
    Thanks in advance for taking a look.

    Hello George,
    Thanks for the reply. I believe I have routes that allow both these networks to talk, currently we are redesigning our network so bear with me as the setup is a little goofy.
    The way our devices are connected in terms of the wireless configuration:
    Internet <-> ASA <-> 3750 switch <-> WLC <-> AP <-> Laptop
                                          |
                                      My PC    
    So, currently our default gateway for our LAN (10.10.0.1) is the inside interface of the ASA (like i said, working on changing this). On the ASA I also have a static route configured so any traffic destined for 10.100.21.0/24 send to 10.10.20.2 which is our 3750 Switch.
    On the 3750 switch I set a default gateway for our wireless network of 10.100.21.1. I also configured the trunk from the post above so there is a trunk between the 3750 and the WLC allowing the LAN VLAN and Wireless VLAN to send data across it.
    On our WLC I have this configured:
    Management Interface:
    IP Address: 10.10.20.100
    Netmask: 255.255.0.0
    Gateway: 10.10.0.1
    DHCP Info: 10.10.20.100
    Here is the config for my test interface (which may be the problem):
    IP Address: 10.100.21.2
    Netmask: 255.255.255.0
    Gateway: 10.100.21.1
    DHCP Info: 10.10.20.100
    From my LAN I can ping 10.100.21.1
    Our host on the wireless can get an IP, but when it attempts to ping anything (even its gateway) i get no replies.
    Going back to your question of if we have routes for both networks to talk, I believe we do, unless I am missing something.
    Thanks again for your reply and taking the time to look at this.

  • WLC 4404 Wireless users getting disabled

    Currently Being Moderated
    Wireless users getting disabled
    Hi,
    I have WLC 4404 with 7.0.116.0 version. I was getting following messages for particular APs
    *Dec 20 14:11:13.875: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset
    *Dec 20 14:11:13.908: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Dec 20 14:11:29.383: %LWAPP-5-RLDP: RLDP stopped on slot 0.
    *Dec 20 14:11:29.674: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
    *Dec 20 14:11:29.678: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset
    *Dec 20 14:11:29.700: %LWAPP-5-RLDP: RLDP started on slot 0.
    *Dec 20 14:11:29.707: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Dec 20 14:11:29.752: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
    *Dec 20 14:11:29.757: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset
    *Dec 20 14:11:29.790: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Dec 20 14:11:45.396: %LWAPP-5-RLDP: RLDP stopped on slot 0. *Dec 20 14:11:13.875: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset
    After seeing one of the cisco forum, I have disabled RLDP for that particular APs
    so above messages are rectified.
    But right now we are not able to identify Rogue IP and it is not contained.
    So please give any suggetion so that i can rectify the above messages as well as i can identify the rogue IP.
    Thanks & Regards
    Gaurav Pandya

    Hi Scott,
    You are right i am not able to detect rogue APs because i disabled the RLDP. but when i enable the RLDP for that particular AP. i got the following messages with interface go up and down
    *Dec 20 14:11:13.875: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset
    *Dec 20 14:11:13.908: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Dec 20 14:11:29.383: %LWAPP-5-RLDP: RLDP stopped on slot 0.
    *Dec 20 14:11:29.674: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
    *Dec 20 14:11:29.678: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset
    *Dec 20 14:11:29.700: %LWAPP-5-RLDP: RLDP started on slot 0.
    So please suggest me the mid way so that i can enable the RLDP (Detect the rogue APs) with out interface going up and down frequently.
    Regards
    Gaurav

  • 3850 command to show wireless user dACL

    Hi,
    I am using 3850 and 5760 with converged access mode.
    There is also ISE to provide dACL for wireless user.
    In 3850, I can issue "show access-list" to see the dACL from ISE.
    But I can't be sure which ACL apply to which user when there are more than one dACL.
    I have tried command like "show wireless client mac-address MAC detail" but didn't see anything related.
    I can only achieve that by checking logs on ISE.
    Is there any command I can do for this purpose?
    3850 and 5760 version : 3.3.0
    ISE version : 1.2
    Thanks!!!

    Hi Mason,
    I know that for switch IOS the command "show authentication session interface INTERFACE" shows the dACL that is applied to this port. I think the new command for the IOSXE devices is "show access-session mac H.H.H detail" is the corresponding one which should show the dACL that was applied to that MAC-address.
    Please see if that works for you.
    Best regards,
    Patrick Meyer

  • Manage Wireless Users

    Not sure if this in in the right place, but I work in a school, and up until now we have been using open directory and network homes to manage users. As we have been getting laptops for kids with special needs, we have been increasing our number of wireless users. I understand that network home folders work for wireless, but I found it is quite slow. I havn't messed around too much with mobile accounts, but I am currently looking at that for my mac laptops. My question is, is there anyway with Tiger server that I can make users autheniticate before they are allowed on the network? I don't need to manage the PC laptops (or the mac laptops for that matter) I just need to authenticate them so that not everybody has access.
    Thanks

    Various WiFi devices can use IEEE 802.1x or RADIUS authentication as part of (dis)allowing a user access to a wireless network, and Mac OS X Server can field and can respond to those access requests via Open DIrectory.
    Check your particular WiFi router(s) for details and options and features.
    The Apple WiFi devices I've worked with have options here.
    If your devices do not offer authentication support, either consider an upgrade or check to see if they offer Access Point (AP) features or some other authentication mechanism, and report back here.
    Tossing large wads of (disk) data around can be rather bandwidth-intensive, and that usually means upgrades to 802.11n 5 GHz dual-slot, or more WiFi sites and faster back-haul links from those, or distributing the files outwards into the targets or into local caches. The approach toward resolving bandwidth issues usually starts with calculating how much bandwidth you're using and that you expect to need, and working through your configuration to identify bottlenecks (eg: 100 Mb LAN segments, overloaded NICs) and removing or augmenting those connections. Toward identifying and removing the bottlenecks. Or toward lowering loads. Or spreading and smoothing out the peak load. Or a combination of these.

  • No of wireless users

    Hi,
    We have purchased cisco linksys WRT54G device.
    We are interested to know how many wireless users can connect to this device. (like these many g users, b users, a users)
    Regards
    skrao

    hey man:
    i tried to get the same information on a different device with no luck. i think the CONSERVATIVE rule of thumb is twenty five users per AP on corporate grade hardware. Given the fact that you can get third party firmware for the device, i would think you can handle that with the right firmware.
    an alternative would be to spend 5K on a wlc2006 and a few access points. I have eighty users on a three ap network with no complaints.
    please don't forget to rate the post.

  • Cisco NAC: Issue for the Wireless Users being assigned "Un-Authenticated Role" to stop accessing the Network !!!

    Hi,
    I am looking for a solution to deal with the wireless NAC users being authenticating (Web Login Only) from a particular AD group. The mapped users gets into a particular role and access VLAN but un-mapped users get the default role which is "Un-Authentication Role" but also gets the same Access VLAN. So, the un-wanted users gets also the same access which is undesired.
    I tried with one solution which is, i put those users into a role named as "Deny_Role" and Enable a Timer of 1 minute (least Time) on it, which seems working but i can see that user is disconnecting (session timeout) after 3 or 5 minutes. I want to limit this but again, i do not find this as an appropriate solution.
    We could deal with wired users easily, bounce the port and get them again in "Unauthenticated Role" and VLAN will be "Un-Auth VLAN" with no network access or rediect them into a particular role with a specific VLAN. But, this is not valid in case of "Wireless Users".
    So, I am looking for a solution to deal with the wireless users in this situation...
    Please advise or give an idea.
    BR,
    Mubasher Sultan

    Hi,
    Any idea or suggestion...
    BR,
    Mubasher Sultan

  • How do i manage multiple users and devices with one apple id without everything showing up on every device?

    how do i manage multiple users and devices with one apple id without everything showing up on every device?

    How to use multiple iPhone, iPad, or iPod devices with one computer

  • Reauthencation of Wireless User does not get prompt

    Hi Sir,
    I set up a Radius server(Cisco ACS) to authenticate wireless users via 802.1x. The EAP protocol deployed is Microsoft PEAP as most of the clients OS is XP. The users might be sharing the same laptops. When a user select the wireless network to connect to, he was prompted a window for him to enter the Username, Password and Domain field. After successful authentication, he was able to access the network resources.
    However, the user is not prompted the Username, Password and Domain after he has done so the first time. I understand that XP cached the user credentials in the registry. But my customer would like the window prompt to appear when the following scenario happens to reauthenticate
    a) Session timeout (Notice options in Group profile in ACS but didnt seem to work). What is this session timeout in ACS?
    b) Idle timeout to reauthenticate the current wireless user as the user might leave his workspace for a short period of time and someone might have use his credential to access the network illegitimately
    c) When he shuts down the PC and the laptop is passed to another user but the previous user credential is used rather than the second user credentioal is used.
    How can I disable the automatic cached user credentials? Is there a way to prompt the user after a period of time for him to enter Username, Password and Domain field again? Is the option available in the XP client? I search through the AP configuration options but found none.
    Please advise. Thank you
    Delon

    Try this link
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk59/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094671.shtml#cswin

  • Can iTunes from 2 different computer use the same library?  (from wireless data storage device)

    I purchased a wireless data storage device.  My iTunes content will be moved there and I'm planning on moving my wife's iTunes data to the wireless device.  Can both our iTunes share the same library?

    One Apple ID can be shared for store purchases. On the iPhone go to Settings>Store and put in the ID. Then all the songs purchased with that ID can be downloaded from the iTunes store on the phone.
    I hope that is what you were asking?

Maybe you are looking for

  • If I have an iPad 1 with no camera, and I want to change it for an ipad 3 is true that if I give my ipad I get the cheapest ipad 3

    if I have an iPad 1 with no camera, and I want to change it for an ipad 3 is true that if I give my ipad I get the cheapest ipad 3

  • How can I install FCP7 on Moutain Lion

    I'm trying to install FCP 7 on my new laptop.  This an upgrade version of FCP 7, and a new MacBook Pro.  It let's me install DVD Studio Pro, Soundtrack Pro and Motion, but not the other apps in the suite, especially the main one FCP.

  • [Solved]conky-lua

    I was trying to install conky-lua when I got this error, and I don't know how to proceed from here. Please help. Last edited by Laplace_ (2009-12-29 05:15:15)

  • Not able to edit song info

    I cannot edit any song info (summary, sorting, info, options, artwork). Also, everytime I open my account I notice that the option to authorize my account is open even though that has already been done. I am storing my iTunes songs on an external har

  • Acrobat Reader MDT Install String

    I have configured a transform file for Acrobat Reader and want to update to the 10.1.4 patch. I am trying to install Acrobat Reader using this command via MDT: msiexec /i AcroRead.msi PATCH=AdbeRdrUpd1014.msp TRANSFORMS=AcroRead.mst /qb It works fine