Row wise warehouse code using FMS

Hi Experts,
How to get warehouse code in row wise W.r.t Document Series name using format search?
Client requirement is no default warehouse code for an item as it exists in all warehouse. When user changes series in Marketing document corresponding ware house should appear for that item
Example: if series name is BLR/SPR the BLR warehouse come .
Regards
KMJ

Hi,
1.Create UDF in ware house setup window
2. Assign each warehouse with default series code
3. Run below query and save it query manager
SELECT T0.[WhsCode] FROM OWHS T0 WHERE T0.[U_LinkWH] = $[ORDR.series]
4. Assign above FMS in warehouse filed of marketing documents
Note: First test in demoDB.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Similar Messages

Does Row Wise Initialised block effects the performance of OBIEE 10.1.3.2.0

Hi,
I am trying to implement the security in my application using row wise initialisation block. Could any one help me with below mentioned doubts:
1) Does it effect the performance of the OBIEE server.
2) Cons with row wise initialisation block used for implementing security which uses Oracle customise function in it. this initialisation block is been created for implementing 2 level security.
Thanks
Savita

Savita,
Answers to your questions are as follows:
*1) Does it effect the performance of the OBIEE server.*
No. This is part of the Oracle BI Repository modeling process for Oracle BI 10g.
*2) Cons with row wise initialisation block used for implementing security which uses Oracle customise function in it. this initialisation block is been created for implementing 2 level security.*
There really aren't any cons. To get the security you are seeking row-wise security in Oracle BI 10g is the route you must take. In addition, this process is used widely in Oracle BI 10g for numbers of consecutive users and total users/groups in an LDAP or security group table ranging from hundreds to tens of thousands with nothing but success. So, don't worry about implementing this as your implementation will be sound by configuring row-wise security.

G/L Account is missing [Good Receipt-rows-Warehouse Code]

G/L Account is missing [Good Receipt-rows-Warehouse Code] '702' message 131-46
Hi everyone,
I know this is a simple question with a simple answer. However i have run through all the basics and still get the same error. Worst of all i had posted to the warehouse using the same function about 3secs before receiving this error and everything posted fine.
Any ideas?
Candida

Thanks for the reply, Candida.
Please verify the parent or component item quantities. The quantities may have gone to Negative. Hence, kindly ensure that an account is defined in the Negative Inventory Adjustment Account (Define Warehouse, Define Item Group, Item Level of Item Master Data, where appropriate).
I hope this solves the issue.
Regards,
Lorna

Prompt using SQL Results with row-wise session variable comparison

I have a prompt on Department and I only want the departments to show that have been authorized via a session variable for that user. The session variable can return can return multiple values and is set as row-wise. The session variable is returning results and have been used successfully in an application filter.
I'm trying to put the correct SQL statement and this syntax doesn't work:
SELECT "Department"."Department Code"
FROM "UBC Financials - YTD Table"
WHERE "Department"."Department Code" = '@{DEPT_LIMITS}'
Can someone give me an example that does work?
Thanks,

Try something like WHERE "Department"."Department Code" = VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION."DEPT_LIMITS")
or else filter on department and then hit on add then Session variable
~ http://cool-bi.com

Update report row wise using row buttons and success message

Hi Jari,
Thanks for your reply but i wan't success message in success message region of page and not as popup or alert message.
for report it is classic report but two columns are text field.
Thanks
Manish
Hi,
On Demand process you can use HTP.P to output success message after you code.
Create also exception handler that output error using same HTP.P.
When you call Ajax in JavaScript
var ajaxResult=ajaxRequest.get();
Result you output are in variable ajaxResult.
You can use e.g. alert
alert(ajaxResult);
Refresh report depend lot of what report you have.
There is lot of posts relating interactive report and classic in this forum.
It might be good to create sample what you already have done to apex.oracle.com.
Also creating new post might be good idea as this is answered.
Regards,
Jari

866038 wrote:
Errors come from trying things that don't work.
For example, instead of =, using IN VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION.GROUP) or @{session.GROUP} or lots of other things.
The question is this:
how can I filter a column in Answers using the GROUP session variable which had been initialized in a row-wise initialization block?
I can find no way to do it. Mostly it returns no rows.Hi,
we had a similar requirement, where we have an external name that has project number values. We used row wise initialization to capture all the projects that a user belongs to. Then, we applied the filters at the RPD level, instead of doing it at the report level. From you requirement I see that you are trying to filter the groups based on user login. When a user logs in, he will see the information about the groups that he only belongs to. Correct me if I am wrong here.
Assuming I am right about your requirement, providing the filter that you need apply in RPD.
On all the fact tables are joined to the Package Virtual Group dimension, apply the below filter.
case when 1=1 then (Dim)"."Package Virtual Group" END = VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION."GROUP");
The reason for use of case statement here is, it converts the logical sql to IN Clause, helping us acheive the exact query that we would want.
Please Award points if this helps.
Thanks,
-Amith.

Inventory account is not defined [Goods Receipt PO - Rows - Warehouse Code

Hai All,
When I copied from PO to GR PO the below said error accord. G/L are set by Item level.
General Setting > Inventory Tab > Set G/L Accounts as : *by item level*
Error:
Inventory account is not defined [Goods Receipt PO - Rows - Warehouse Code][line: 1] , [Message 173-77]
Please provide me a solution.
Regards
Sudarshan

hiii Sudarshan
       if you have set g/l a/c by item then go to
administration-setup-inventory (stock management)-warehouse-(your particular warehouse) -accounting
                assign g/l account ,
                                   hope this helps you
                                                  Good Luck
                                                                 RIYAZ

Use Session Variable with row-wise initialization

Hello,
I use an initialization block in order to load some translations in my repository (version is 11.1.1.6.BP1) :
SQL :
SELECT CODE_KEY, STRING_VALUE FROM "TABLES" WHERE LANGUAGE_KEY= 'VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION.USERLOCALE)'
Values :
CN_INCOMING, Incoming, en
CN_OUTGOING, Outgoing, en
CN_INCOMING, Réception, fr
CN_OUTGOING, Emission, fr
etc ...
I checked the row-wise intialization.
The query is correct and returns the right values (I check in the log file ..).
So far, So good.
But when I want to use session variables in a column expression (in repository) like :
CASE WHEN "column"="xx" THEN VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION."CN_INCOMING") ELSE VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION."CN_OUTGOING") END
I got the error: [nQSError: 23006] The session variable, NQ_SESSION.CN_OUTGOING, has no value definition.
If I used the same formula directly in Answers it's working correctly.
Do I have to necessarily do this in answers or is there a way to do this in the repository.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Benjamin

Yes I already tested this point, when I don't use a row wise initialization it's working, but I don't want to create one variable for each translations that I need to use in column formula if you know what I mean.
I don't understand why we can't use this kind of variable in this context ..but if I have to create the column in my analysis, I will do that, but it's not really user friendly
Anyway thanks for your time.

Using row-wise multi-value GROUP system session variable in report filter

The title says it all except I am using 10g OBIEE.
What I want to do is filter on the dynamic system session variable GROUP created in a row-wise initialization block.
The GROUP vriable is being set up correctly and it shows the user dynamically put into the correct groups in Answers.
(Using the admin tool and looking at the user session, only the initial authentication block variables show up.)
But if I want to filter using the value of GROUP it doesn't work.
The obvious way is to choose the filter icon, then choose Add -> Variable -> Session, enter GROUP, and then display results.
It comes back with no rows.
Any idea how to do this? I've tried lots of things but none of them work either producing no rows or an error.
This is the kind of Answers SQL this report is resulting in, which makes sense to me, but produces no rows.
SELECT "Package Virtual Group (Dim)"."Package Virtual Group" saw_0, "Contact (Fact)"."Contacts All Count" saw_1 FROM "Case/Transaction/ABC" WHERE "Package Virtual Group (Dim)"."Package Virtual Group" = VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION."GROUP") ORDER BY saw_0

866038 wrote:
Errors come from trying things that don't work.
For example, instead of =, using IN VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION.GROUP) or @{session.GROUP} or lots of other things.
The question is this:
how can I filter a column in Answers using the GROUP session variable which had been initialized in a row-wise initialization block?
I can find no way to do it. Mostly it returns no rows.Hi,
we had a similar requirement, where we have an external name that has project number values. We used row wise initialization to capture all the projects that a user belongs to. Then, we applied the filters at the RPD level, instead of doing it at the report level. From you requirement I see that you are trying to filter the groups based on user login. When a user logs in, he will see the information about the groups that he only belongs to. Correct me if I am wrong here.
Assuming I am right about your requirement, providing the filter that you need apply in RPD.
On all the fact tables are joined to the Package Virtual Group dimension, apply the below filter.
case when 1=1 then (Dim)"."Package Virtual Group" END = VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION."GROUP");
The reason for use of case statement here is, it converts the logical sql to IN Clause, helping us acheive the exact query that we would want.
Please Award points if this helps.
Thanks,
-Amith.

Row-wise Initialization: Use caching

We have the 'Use Caching' check box available for row-wise initialized system variables. Although I do understand how this is useful as it shortens the login time for users who have logged in before by initializing the session variable from the cache instead of firing the query on the database everytime, I need to understand how this cache mechanism works especially when the overall server caching is disabled.
I have faced a situation where the session variable was initialized from the cache although the server caching was disabled. Is there any way to purge this cache or set a refresh frequency? As of now I had to uncheck the 'Use Caching' check box to fetch the refreshed results in the session variable. But I believe this is undesirable in the long term.
Thanks,
Gaurav

Had thought so. But then it means that you can use row-wise initialization with caching, only when the underlying data is never going to change. Restarting the BI server is not a viable option to clear the cache in systems which require 100% availability.
But any ways, thanks for the input Dhar.
Thanks,
Gaurav

Write the sql query to find largest value in row wise without using   great

write the sql query to find largest value in row wise without using
greatest fuction?

Another not so good way, considering you want greatest of 4 fields from a single record:
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 with t as (Select 100 col1,200 col2,300 col3,400 col4 from dual
2 union select 500,600,700,800 from dual
3 union select 900,1000,1100,1200 from dual
4 union select 1300,1400,1500,1600 from dual
5 union select 1700,1800,1900,2000 from dual
6 union select 2100,2200,2300,2400 from dual
7 union select 2800,2700,2600,2500 from dual
8 union select 2900,3000,3100,3200 from dual)
9 SELECT (CASE WHEN col1 > col2 THEN col1 ELSE col2 END) Max_value
10 FROM
11 (SELECT (CASE WHEN col1_col2 > col2_col3 THEN col1_col2 ELSE col2_col3 END) col1,
12         (CASE WHEN col2_col3 > col3_col4 THEN col2_col3 ELSE col3_col4 END) col2,
13         (CASE WHEN col3_col4 > col4_col1 THEN col3_col4 ELSE col4_col1 END) col3
14 FROM
15 (SELECT (CASE WHEN col1 > col2 THEN col1 ELSE col2 END) col1_col2,
16         (CASE WHEN col2 > col3 THEN col2 ELSE col3 END) col2_col3,
17         (CASE WHEN col3 > col4 THEN col3 ELSE col4 END) col3_col4,
18         (CASE WHEN col4 > col1 THEN col4 ELSE col1 END) col4_col1
19* FROM t))
SQL> /
MAX_VALUE
       400
       800
      1200
      1600
      2000
      2400
      2800
      3200
8 rows selected.
SQL> Edited by: AP on Sep 21, 2010 6:29 AM

Use row wise session variable in IN CLAUSE

Hi,
I' have a question. Suppose I have a row wise session variable named Users setted in an initialization block with following SQL query:
SELECT 'NAMES', names from NAMES_TABLE where GROUP='Administrators'
Suppose it returns value list 'JOHN, MARIE'.
Can I set another row wise session variable named COUNTRY in initialization block with following SQL query:
SELECT 'COUNTRY', country from COUNTRY_TABLE where names IN (VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION.Users))?
so that COUNTRY variable returns for example list 'CANADA','OHIO'?
or OBIEE returns error?
If it's not possible can you give me a solution?
Thanks

Hi,
I've resolved, but now I have another problem.
I have a row-wise session variable called COMPANY_FILTER
In Dashboard Prompt "Show" Section I have following query:
SELECT Country."Company Description" from Prototype where Country."ID" = VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION.COMPANY_FILTER).
When COMPANY_FILTER has at least one value it works fine. But COMPANY_FILTER can be even empty.
In the latter case query fails.
Now, when COMPANY_FILTER is null I must execute following query:
SELECT Country."Company Description" from Prototype
otherwise when it is filled i must execute following query:
SELECT Country."Company Description" from Prototype where Country."ID" = VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION.COMPANY_FILTER).
I have tried with CASE WHEN, but i don't know the exact syntax. Can you suggest me a correct query for my goals?
Thanks

Row wise Initialization - Huge LOV

We use External table for Authentication & uses row wise Initialization. It is working perfectly fine, but the issue is the list of values (output) from row wise initialization is pretty large (the output SQL will be at least 30 pages). This is alarming the management and mainly the DBA's and atleast once in a week we are experiencing issues with these SQL's. And in near future, the SQL will be extending drastically as the company has acquired another 2 companies and once the integration is completed, the LOV's from row wise initialization will easily go upto 90 to 100 pages. Let me explain you what I did... We have around 10 Init blocks used for Authentication, but I am mainly concerned about 2 (cf_visibility & sc_visibility) as these are used in Security/Group/Permissions/Report Filters. Each report will for sure have these filters attached. Here cf_visibility Init SQL is (SELECT DISTINCT 'cf_list', CHILD_COMPANY_ID FROM COMPANY_VISIBILITY CV, CLIENT_FACILITY CF WHERE CV.ANCESTOR_COMPANY_ID=(SELECT SUBSTR(':USER', 0, (INSTR(':USER', '.')) - 1) FROM DUAL) AND CV.CHILD_COMPANY_ID=CF.CLIENT_FACILITY_ID AND CV.DW_DELETE_DATE IS NULL UNION SELECT DISTINCT 'cf_list', 0 FROM DUAL) and
sc_visibility Init SQL is (SELECT DISTINCT 'sc_list', CHILD_COMPANY_ID FROM COMPANY_VISIBILITY CV,SERVICE_CENTER SC WHERE CV.ANCESTOR_COMPANY_ID= (SELECT SUBSTR(':USER', 0, (INSTR(':USER', '.')) - 1) FROM DUAL) AND CV.CHILD_COMPANY_ID=SC.SERVICE_CENTER_ID AND CV.DW_DELETE_DATE IS NULL
UNION SELECT DISTINCT 'sc_list', 0 FROM DUAL)
and both are row wise initialization blocks. The filter used for all the Groups is [(DEP.Jobs."Client Facility ID" = VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION."cf_list")) AND (DEP.Jobs."Service Center ID" = VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION."sc_list"))]. This output LOV for this filter is huge as I said earlier.
My main goal here is to reduce the size of the SQL to 1 page, I am planning to do that by replacing the LOV list by SQL (Kind of sub query). I started experimenting with only cf_visibility for now. I replaced the existing SQL with (select 'cf_list',
'SELECT DISTINCT CHILD_COMPANY_ID FROM COMPANY_VISIBILITY CV, CLIENT_FACILITY CF WHERE CV.ANCESTOR_COMPANY_ID=(SELECT SUBSTR('':USER'', 0, (INSTR('':USER'', ''.'')) - 1) FROM DUAL) AND CV.CHILD_COMPANY_ID=CF.CLIENT_FACILITY_ID AND CV.DW_DELETE_DATE IS NULL UNION SELECT DISTINCT 0 FROM DUAL'
from dual)
this returns only 1 row, with 1column as cf_list and the next column with the ('SELECT DISTINCT CHILD_COMPANY_ID FROM COMPANY_VISIBILITY CV, CLIENT_FACILITY CF WHERE CV.ANCESTOR_COMPANY_ID=(SELECT SUBSTR('':USER'', 0, (INSTR('':USER'', ''.'')) - 1) FROM DUAL) AND CV.CHILD_COMPANY_ID=CF.CLIENT_FACILITY_ID AND CV.DW_DELETE_DATE IS NULL UNION SELECT DISTINCT 0 FROM DUAL') Note: USER will be replaced with actual User Name.
But when I run a report in Answers, it throws me an error [nQSError: 17001] Oracle Error code: 1722, message: ORA-01722: invalid number at OCI call OCIStmtExecute. I understand the error as it is clearly mentioned, but my question is "Is there any way not to get that huge list in the SQL"
Let me show you the SQL generated along with the error. As this is a Report filter I am only attaching the where clause of the Query. (where ( T38857.CLIENT_FACILITY_ID in ('SELECT DISTINCT ''cf_list'', CHILD_COMPANY_ID FROM COMPANY_VISIBILITY CV, CLIENT_FACILITY CF WHERE CV.ANCESTOR_COMPANY_ID=(SELECT SUBSTR(''5700.abcde'', 0, (INSTR(''5700.abcde'', ''.'')) - 1) FROM DUAL) AND CV.CHILD_COMPANY_ID=CF.CLIENT_FACILITY_ID AND CV.DW_DELETE_DATE IS NULL UNION SELECT DISTINCT ''cf_list'', 0 FROM DUAL') ).
So I also thought if I use REPLACE function and replace 'Single Quote' before and after the SQL statement with 'Space', it may work. So I edited one of the Group's report filter ((DEP.Jobs."Client Facility ID" = Replace('VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION."cf_list")', ''', ' ') but it is throwing an error in the expression builder itself.
Now I ran out of ideas and seeking any help/guidance from you folks.
I know this is a very lengthy post as I tried to explain the situation as clearly as possible. I hope someone can assist me in resolving this. Thanks for your Time...
-Dinee

can't you make a custom table in the DWH? or use a VPD? Maybe a parameterised database view? What I mean is try to push your logic to the database.
regards
John
http://obiee101.blogspot.com

Finding variable data value using fms

hi experts
i want find variable field value by using fms.pls help me
exact scenerio is
i want fetch the value tax amount of respective tax code from the Define tax Amount distribution form.
eg.if suppose i tax code BED+VAT then i want get what is the calculated value of excise ,cess and and vat .i get the row tax amount.whwn i click tax amount filed i get tax amount distribution form from this form i want that particular valu
what is exactsql for this

Hi Sachin,
No need to go FMS. Open any transcation screen. For eg., Open Sales Order, goto Form Setting -> Table Format. Please check the field column like "Tax Only".
Then open any SO, check it out this Link, u will get the full information and tax break etc...
Thanks
SAGAR

Row wise total in editable ALV

hello all,
            I am workin on editable alv, the user need to enter the values in the editable fields and in the last column(non-editable) i need to populate the total row wise,as soon as user enters a value and goes to next editable cell or on entering a vale and press enter.how to accomplish this task...
with regards,
sandeep akella.
Edited by: sandeep akella on Aug 20, 2009 1:58 PM

You need to Implement the OnCellAction event.follow these steps;
1. Goto WDDOMODIFYVIEW and place the following code
IF first_time IS INITIAL.
    DATA lo_cmp_usage TYPE REF TO if_wd_component_usage.
    lo_cmp_usage =   wd_this->wd_cpuse_usg_alv( ).
    IF lo_cmp_usage->has_active_component( ) IS INITIAL.
      lo_cmp_usage->create_component( ).
    ENDIF.
    DATA lo_interfacecontroller TYPE REF TO iwci_salv_wd_table .
    lo_interfacecontroller =   wd_this->wd_cpifc_usg_alv( ).
    DATA lo_value TYPE REF TO cl_salv_wd_config_table.
    lo_value = lo_interfacecontroller->get_model(
    CALL METHOD lo_value->if_salv_wd_table_settings~set_cell_action_event_enabled
     EXPORTING
        value = abap_true.
ENDIF.
2. Implement the onCellAction event as follows;
    Goto Methods tab, create a new method. Method Type- Event Handler , Event - ON_CELL_ACTION
3. Now in this method retrive the contents of the row and calculate the value as follows.
DATA: l_element TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_element.
DATA:ls_stru TYPE wd_this->element_cn_alv.
DATA: l_node TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_node.
l_node = wd_context->get_child_node( 'CN_ALV' ).
l_element = l_node->get_element( r_param->index ).
l_element->get_static_attributes( IMPORTING static_attributes = ls_stru ).
ls_stru-last_col = ls_stru-col1+ls_stru-col2....+ ls_stru-col5. " add all the cells data
l_element->set_static_attributes( exporting static_attributes = ls_stru ).

Omit the final SUM row in a report using breaks

We have a report using breaking whereby it is broken for current day, week to date and month to date. We want to use the column SUM feature so that we have a count of all records for the day, week to date and month to date.
This works fine, however we also get a final sum row on the bottom of the report which is a sum of the month, week and day count. This is meaningless as the month includes the week which in turn includes the day - all it gives is a useless large number! :)
Is there a way to stop this final column being displayed?
Thanks in advance

I have managed to remove the last row in a table using the following code:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#JK_TEST .t7standard tr:last").remove();
</script>However, the report uses a bottom border implemented using a <TR> so I actually need to remove the second to last row. I have tried to work out how to do this but am still trying!!! Any suggestions?
EDIT::
DONE IT!!! :D:D :D
Cheers for the help!
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#JK_TEST .t7standard tr:last").prev($('<TR>')).remove();
</script>Cheers!
Edited by: /dev/null on Mar 24, 2009 4:49 PM

Row wise warehouse code using FMS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for